Crikey what another superb documentary from Chris. The BBC made a great 3 part series a number of years ago. The actor who played Guy Fawkes is the same actor who played Jon Snowe in Game of Thrones. When he was doing research on his role as Guy Fawkes it turns our he was actually a descendant of him! I remember years ago when doing a historic tour of London's famous sites our tour guide who obviously had no political or religious allegiance said of Guy Fawkes "He was probably the only honest person to ever have set foot in parliament". The laughter from his audience rang out so loudly amongst the historic environment. Even as I post this I am laughing.
Sir, as an American I enjoy your videos very much. I remember reading about this when I was a young man in high school way back in about 1965, or 1966 in a world history class that I took. I have always been interested in history. I think that your videos are most informative and very interesting. Thank you so very much for your videos and the time and effort that you take to present them.
@@TheHistoryChap Sir, I truly enjoy your videos. There is a man here in America that calls himself THE HISTORY GUY. I find that you both present the most interesting videos of history. I've always enjoyed history from an early age. I'm 72 now and find that history in all of its forms is very important to be preserved and passed down to the younger generations of our planet. I look forward to your new (and past )videos. Children in today's world need to be taught history in ALL its forms. This old YANK thanks you .
Amazing detail about this event in our history. Perhaps a tale about Westminster Palace itself. I find it fascinating that it was also a place of commerce which allowed this to take place. Amazing story well told.
Thanks Chris, another brilliant story, and one that I knew very little of. My decision not to take history in high school has left me madly catching up. And your videos are brilliant for that, cheers
Fantastic!...I just love the history of England which you explain so elegantly well. I am looking forward to your next enthusiastic presentation on the past.
Guy Fawkes was christened in the church which is next to York Minster, there are blue plaques in the city commemorating this & where he lived. Thanks Chris, as always you hit the nail on the head! Your enthusiasm keeps us enthralled in the stories from history, another must watch video 👍
He was educated at St Peter's, York - which does not celebrate Bonfire Night because, as a former headmaster used to put it, he didn't want to commemorate failure.
Thank you, I enjoyed your story very much. You might consider the story of the two stokers who managed to destroy the Houses of Parliament where Fawkes failed. Take care.
It's interesting that today in the UK on any Sunday there are more Catholics in church than Protestants. Many of these are Polish but I think you downplay the extent of Catholic sentiment at the time. Were they ready to take up arms? No but the number of English Catholics today speaks to their numbers in the 17th century. A great video as usual.
i think you will find that the catholic numbers swelled in the 18th century when the irish came over...you can get a better idea of catholic numbers from the schools in any given area. i live in north manchester and went secondary school(78-83) and there was one catholic high school and 4 C of E /state schools serving the same area and when they built my estate theres one catholic primary and 2 C of E/state schools. hope that helps,plus the facts are most of us who went/go to state schools,rarely,if at all outside weddings and funerals, step foot in a church. imo
@@philvanderlaan5942 Really? They just wanted to replace the bigoted morons in power, with a similar bunch wearing a different football shirt. Bloody Mary executed more people than the Spanish Inquisition. One lot were as bad as the other.
A point about that priest-hole. A lot of old buildings (16th century and earlier) in Britain have secret hiding spots which exist due to Henry VIII and his persecution of the monasteries. A few more exist from the 18th century during the Civil War (one of many but it's the one we give a The to). The purpose is in the name, these were compartments, rooms or tunnels for persecuted clergy and later royalists to hide in and evade capture. The really lucky royalists during The Civil War had the use of castles, many of which are tragically spited. Corfe Castle in Dorset is a wonderous example of a royalist castle spited by the Parliamentarians, it was destroyed by gunpowder and the enormous chunks of masonry settled upon the hill give a stark and bone-chilling snapshot as to the immense power of such a simple mixture of 4 parts Carbon (charcoal), 2 parts Sulphur and 1 part Saltpetre mixed in wooden casks with wooden balls to help the mixture. No metal was used as this might lead to sparks and the very sudden disappearance of the entire building and occupants therein.
Thank you for another fascinating episode in history. Family legend has it that we are descended from Christopher Wright, so it is great to hear the story with the detail and background it deserves.
One of most interesting thing that I have learned from my work with St. Eustacius and St. Thomas with respect to the American Colonial revolution in 1775 is the difficulty of getting gunpowder. I had no idea of how difficult it was to make or get the stuff, even with the British blockade. AND, shipping the gunpowder over water in merchant sail craft, hundreds of tons at a time! Imagine being a captain or any sailor on that boat. No smoking, I’d hope. A great video.
Thank you Sir for producing another brilliant video. Guy Fawkes and his fellow conspirators for all their elaborate planning. Did not have a chance of success even if they manage blow up parliament and king. And as usual Sir you answered all possibilities. Kudos and bravo. Well done indeed.
@@TheHistoryChap "Thank you for taking the time to comment." I see you posting this to a lot of replies and very often it comes across as sarcastic, asif you are telling the poster to f-off with their smart-ass remarks. Once the heart is disconneced the person passes out within seconds and since there is no bloodflow at all anymore they are also dead a few seconds later. But think about it fora few seconds; you don't just cut out a heart, you first have to open the ribcage and the trauma of that alone will kill most people. In fact, cutting of the genitals would cause an amount of bleeding that would probably end most people. Anyway, the whole point of this punishment was to keep the victim alive as long as possible so they most definately did not start with the thing that kills them. Stop thanking people for comments you don't like, either just ignore them or issue a correction in a pinned post and save us all a lot of frustration.
When first conceived your entrails were meant to be burnt before your living eyes. The theory at that time was that this would prevent you entering into heaven.
Ok, you said it right at the end. I thought you might miss it. That was a great rendition of the Gunpowder Plot and I didn't expect anything less. Thanks for the great History. was looking for some extras and you didn't disappoint. Thanks again Chris.
Great video, Chris. I guess this shows the dangers of following a charismatic idealist. One the one hand, they were very brave men. On the other hand, they were prepared to murder women and children. Terrorists or freedom fighters? Depends on your personal view. And let us not forget that a Catholic monarch would have inevitably led to repression and execution of Protestants. SO....They certainly weren't fighting for religious tolerance, but the obverse side of the repression they themselves had been suffering under. My verdict? Guilty as charged. Terrorists.
Although I have known the basics of the story for many years it was interesting to hear the full context for one of the most famous 'incidents ' in our rich history
I can remember being taught this as a thirteen year old at school. Then I was bored. I wish my History teacher had had some of your breathless enthusiasm in his delivery style as I would have remembered more of the details!
Great channel 👍 I love telling history stories to my class and I check my facts with you and get new stuff. I visited Brecon Museum after watching your Zulu content. Thanks HC! Might do Gunpowder Plot in assembly… but perhaps not in so much detail of course 👍
I know some might poo poo what I'm going to say, but you're welcome to debunk me with evidence. I read somewhere on the web (sorry, I can't remember where), though I would love to have bookmarked the page) that The Gunpowder Plot was a False Flag and the 'plotters' were accidentally discovered. I wonder, what was their intended outcome? A switch in royal ruler (religion), Government only rule, Rule of anarchy (reserch the 'old' meaning of 'anarchy', not the modern meaning). It would be very interesting to actually discover the true reason behind the gunpowder plot...
Hi Chris, thanks for another wonderful history lesson. The BBC should employ you to present some of their history programs. You present your UA-cam content so well. Why have you not been poached yet?
I used to go out penny for the guy when I was a kid, we found that if we set up outside a tube/ subway station we would earn more money that way as more footfall.
I think “penny for the Guy” probably died out in the late 1970’s, early 1980’s. I remember doing it as a young child circa 1978 but since that time I’ve never seen it. Interestingly, a rather harrowing ad campaign in the 1980’s , that warned of the dangers of fireworks, may have somewhat contributed to the decline in the practise of people setting off fireworks in their gardens on Nov 5th. But that’s just my own speculation. In addition, the law regarding the use of fireworks on special occasions is often not understood. Many people in the UK actually believe that it’s illegal to set off fireworks on your own property. That’s actually not the case. Anyway. It’s a much loved tradition that I remember with fondness.
@@robinlee28 we did it outside Farringdon station and made a fortune in pennies back in 67/68/69 then carried on when we moved outside Turnpike Lane Tube station. That’s where the money was Tube stations especially on a Friday when people got paid. I agree with what you said I stopped doing it about mid 70’s had other money making ways like working on the milk rounds and paper delivery rounds.
5th November in Australia when l was a kid was called cracker night,the name given to fireworks,crackers were set off and bonfires lit once the fire brigade turned up at our local paddock as our bonfires got abit out of control,no cracker night now as sale of fireworks banned
I heard of this celebration event during the research on different cultures, it is weird for foregners to see anglo people celebrating a dead terroist who tried blow parliment. It could of been English 1600s's 9/11 before USA if it does happen but i have notice that historical events has brought itself back.
Three more conclusions, Chris: the anti-Catholic legislation later had a knock-on effect on others - mostly Quakers - who refused to take the oaths (sorted largely by Affirmation at the end of the c.17th); worth noting also that fear of creeping Catholicism was a factor in suspicions of Charles I (and his wife!) which would influence the civil wars (and came to fruition with the Glorious Revolution 1688); and finally- Nov. 5th was fhe ONLY holiday for a period in England under the interregnum (including Christmas, I beleive). Quite a tally! (You will excuse me, but as we historians rarely admit " it's actually my period..." 😉).
The photograph of the Royal Palace in Madrid is really superb, with the white walls reflecting the red light of the beatiful sunset over the mountains. But... That is the Royal Palace the Bourbons built in the 18th century over the ruins of the old palace of the Habsburgs, itself made modifying the old 9th century Moslem castle (in Spanish "alcazar", from the Arabic "al Qasr", from the Latin "castrum") the Caliph of al Andalus (Spain and Portugal) ordered to built over the Manzanares river to protect his subjects from the Northern Christian raiders. So now we only can dream of how the old fortress-palace was. Anyway, by 1605 the Spanish king was Philip III, who had handed over the government of his many kingdoms to his favourite, the duke of Lerma, the epitome of political corruption in Spain. By 1601 the duke had moved the king's court from Madrid to Valladolid, then a bigger town 100 miles North beyond the mountains. All the aristocrats, the government officials and every person making business or working for the Crown had to move after the court. And there, in Valladolid, the duke of Lerma had previously bought palaces and houses that all of them, even the king, had to buy whatever the price. So... What about Madrid? Madrid then wasn't such a big city as it is today, and suddenly became empty of people. But don't worry, because about 1603 the good duke of Lerma arrived to save such a difficult situation. He devised a private, in fact personal, investment plan on real state, buying every house, barn, shop, garden, orchard and little piece of land whose owner was eager, desperate to sell at any price because the demand have vanished 2 years ago and there was no prospect of new business. Even too cheap was better than nothing. And the duke helped those poor real state owners. Time passed, Fawkes went in and out of History (and life, poor Guy). And... Suddenly, in 1606 the duke of Lerma realised that those sunsets at Madrid were truly incomparable and in fact much needed, so he ordered that the court moved back to Madrid. Of course the same noble courtiers, civil and military officials, company owners and workers, etc. had to buy or rent again the same houses, barns, shops, gardens, orchards... to their new owner, the crafty duke of Lerma. (I truly meant he was the epitome of corruption, and this was not the worst thing he did to the Spanish people). Sadly, that magnificent photo of the current Royal Palace does not depict the dwelling of His Royal Majesty Philip III of Castile (and II of Portugal and Aragon and even V of Navarre) at Valladolid in 1605. It was a humbler palace, although not so ancient as the old "alcazar". And even sadder is that the red glare in the palace is not as red as the face of everyone knowing that the mischievous duke of Lerma was not punished or even removed from the government until 15 years later.
Kia Ora Chris. With reference to the attack on Coventry, November 14th, 1940. I was taken to Coventry Cathedral as a child with my Mum and Dad on the way to Scotland for a holiday. To be honest, at the age of 8, living in Oxford, it didn't really mean that much. But now, as a near 60-year-old, it means a lot more. I have two questions for you Sir. Why did Hitler not have any "heavy" bombers to speak of? And why was Oxford not bombed? With reference to the Cowley works? Thank you for some great Videos.
Russ, thanks for your kind words about the video. Not sure why Oxford wasn't bombed seeing as the Cowley Works were there. They did target cultural cities such as Norwich, Canterbury & Exeter.
Regarding the number of Catholics in England in the early 1600's - (Four months after the video was posted I'm afraid.) Does anyone contend that there were FAR more than this video indicated? Admittedly, a lot of my "history" comes from movies, but it's not as bad as it sounds. I'll see some period piece, think it looks interesting, then will do a bit of research to see if they got anything right in the movie. So in "Lady Jane" I recall a lot of people were asking "What about Mary?" when Jane was proclaimed Queen. Just a little copy and paste from the Wikipedia article (yes, you don't need to tell me about using Wikipedia as a source) I find that Mary fled to East Anglia where "Many ahderents to the Catholic faith" lived. Shortly thereafter, Northumberland's support collapsed (why?), and Mary "rode triumphantly into London ... on a wave of popular support." So, my impression was that a lot of the poor (which constituted a majority) were Catholic, while the "Protestant" movement was primarily influential people wanting more of the influence that came with redistribution of Catholic property. Or, did people just typically not care about religion but knew Mary should have inherited the throne and didn't trust the kingmakers?
At 09:29 I was examining the family tree. At the top you mention Sir Richard Throckmorton. This was actually Sir Robert Throckmorton. All of the top row of conspirators appear in my extended family tree too. I also have Thomas Percy from the bottom row, and though I've yet to fit them in, I have the Tyrrwhitt family so will also claim Robert Keyes and Ambrose Rockwood if I can fit them in. All personal links to history, which is why I love genealogy.
The pope declared war on England when Henry the 8th left the catholic church and created the church of England. The pope told all catholic countries to invade England and force them back to being catholic. Spain was the only country to try. Guy Fawks was actualy Portuguese.
It seem's the gunpowder plot was probably a hare-brained 'conspiracy' that metamorphorsed into a false flag operation,with the king's approval. That might account for why ten days elapsed before the plot was exposed in an apparently melodramatic manner. It might be that the 'persecution' of catholics was intended to instill greater solidarity between the Scottish & English protestant subjects of king James,if so,with the benefit of hindsight it appears to have been effective.
I have heard most of your stories before but you have a wonderful way of telling them. Brings new life to history and I much appreciate your hard work and talents
Very interesting video just a shame most of yours are all so short, I watched this one as its more than 30 minutes most under that I aviod, I like to settle down & watch a documentary not have to chose another every 10/15 minutes😢
Very good description and i like your narration style. In regards to the plot. Though i dont agree with the method i have to admit it was a pretty daring plan. Time to go and get some fireworks. Have a great bonfire night everyone
Interesting that Lord Darnley was indeed blown up, but in his case survived & escaped as far as the adjoining orchard where he was caught up with and strangled… The Earl of Bothwell seems to have been a lovely man!
Now there’s a subject worthy of exploration! I once visited Stirling Castle and there remains a beautiful French-style window in the castle overlooking a garden. The guide related a story of Mr Bothwell having pushed somebody (I forget who) through the aforesaid window who, considerably worse for wear landed in the garden. When Bothwell was asked by guards what next, he suggested a further trip for the unfortunate, over the castle wall & down the cliff. A loveable chap indeed! Mind you, Darnley (thinking of Ricci’s murder) didn’t seem all that much better. Thanks for your channel - it goes without saying how greatly I enjoy it. Particularly the deft way that you explore seemingly well-known events & show them in a whole new light. More power to you!
Syphilitic Darnley ! See the " rough wooin' culture o' the times! Prior marital rape was a common solution! Perhaps better than Henry the 8th 's preference for axe jobs !
A terminology topic. The last part the Anglican Church creed is: “I believe in the Holy Spirit, the holy catholic Church, the communion of saints, the forgiveness of sins, the resurrection of the body, and the life everlasting. Amen.” This meaning of catholic as in universal. If written with a capital C as Catholic refers to Roman Catholic. When spoken, have often thought when first used, it should be as Roman Catholic to avoid confusion. Should frequent use of catholic be better always phased as Roman Catholic?
As for the question "Should frequent use of catholic be better always phased as Roman Catholic?" - In my opinion it is not necessary, despite as you imply a lot of "Protestant" denominations (I'm using that term in the broadest possible sense) use the word catholic in the creed, and as Adam pointed out there are numerous rites in "Catholicism" which are not "Roman" Catholic. Given the number of people in the English speaking world today who are basically clueless when it comes to religion - it's generally understood "Catholic" refers to the Roman Catholic Church. Anyone referring to any of the other rites will generally specify to which non Roman Catholic church they refer. Any Protestants using the word catholic (meaning universal) in the Nicean Creed and knowing they're not Roman Catholic should already know what that word with the little "c" means.
He was king of England. He was seperately also king of Scotland. The plot was by Englishmen to get rid of their king. They didn't give a hoot about what was happening in Scotland.
Sir, the story of Gunpowder plot presented by you, is the best and most informative. Gunpowder plot is somewhat my 'hobby horse' and I have to say that no sufficient detail of the event was missing. I was lucky enough to spend overnight at Coombe Abbey, where I found out about Princess Elizabeth who had been living there from 1603 till 1608. So, once again, thank you so much - you are extremely knowledgeable person.
How did catesby know about the letter? Who tipped him off about the tip off?! Btw I’m pathetically pedantic and faceless so I’m going to point out there’s 17 years between the armada and gunpowder plot
It is a refreshing change to hear somebody clearly stating that the King was the target, and that this was for religious reasons. It gets rather tedious to continually have to listen to the notion that Guy Fawkes is somehow a symbol of anti-corruption, and that his sole aim was to bring justice to duplicitous politicians. I live in the N Yorkshire town of Knaresborough. 1 mile away is the village of Scotton. In Scotton you can drink at the pub,..."The Guy Fawkes". Although it is claimed that Fawkes was born in Stonegate, York, the people of Scotton KNOW that Fawkes was from Scotton. This is backed up by the fact that the local school, King James' School (1616), was founded on the orders of King James, because he wanted to ensure that the parish did not produce another Guy Fawkes. Difficult to know the real truth of any of this,.....(you try telling a Yorkshireman that he is wrong about anything). Any thoughts on this Mr Green? Oh, and as to terrorist or freedom-fighter.......although it is a title reserved for those of a different faith, religious fanatics who leave their own lands to fight a religious war in another country are Jihadi. Not entirely the correct label for Fawkes, but the closest to the spirit of it all in my humble opinion.
As you would probably say, don't use a match to check the petrol. Me, being from the other side of the pond, am really glad you put this out? Still not sure if he was just the scapegoat, because all the others were dealt with, so I'm still kinda confused as to why just Guy Fawkes only is rememered.
Who were they fighting for ? Quite simply, religious zealotry. Another example of the tens of thousands of times that religion has resulted in the innumerable deaths, misery and and suffering of innocent people. Religion is fine ; fanatasism is not.
It's all too easy to view history without considering what went before. From the days of Wycliffe through to Tyndale. There was frightful persecution of Christians who simply believed the Bible and rejected Roman Catholic claims to supremacy over everything related to belief. Your history is normally very good but the absence of information about the Roman Catholic behaviour with the Dominican Inquisition, including their 'crusade' against the Waldensians and Albigenses. An overview of Catholic power in the Middle Ages is needed. England actually did not suffer as much as the Europeans did under Catholic oppression. The English had enough of Catholic power and decided they did not want a Catholic monarch ever again. This whole saga had a massive role in the development Englands great democracy. Too many modern, evolution-believing historians downplay the role that religion v. Biblical Christianity played in England. Too much is placed on Henry VIII and his games. Esp. passions for the Bible in England.
if they had managed to set it off then wouldn't there have been burning firewood coming down all over the place along with any human remains? a shocking thought
I’m American and my people were early English Colonists to America. I understand about the Catholic versus Protestant thing . The Stewart’s were terrible Monarchs in my opinion . And the later Monarchs were also just as bad. I’m pretty sure the last good Monarch was Alfred the Great
I disagree... Elizabeth I, Charles II, Victoria , George VI ,and Elizabeth II ,were quite good monarchs who helped their people and their kingdom through difficult times . From another American of British ancestry 🇬🇧
Actually , I think Henry V was a great English King. He had some issues but he was a brave King in Battle. Anyone who could survive getting an arrow stuck in your face gets my respect
Crikey what another superb documentary from Chris. The BBC made a great 3 part series a number of years ago. The actor who played Guy Fawkes is the same actor who played Jon Snowe in Game of Thrones. When he was doing research on his role as Guy Fawkes it turns our he was actually a descendant of him! I remember years ago when doing a historic tour of London's famous sites our tour guide who obviously had no political or religious allegiance said of Guy Fawkes "He was probably the only honest person to ever have set foot in parliament". The laughter from his audience rang out so loudly amongst the historic environment. Even as I post this I am laughing.
You've got me laughing too!
I remember that 3 parter :)
Very good 👍
Sir, as an American I enjoy your videos very much. I remember reading about this when I was a young man in high school way back in about 1965, or 1966 in a world history class that I took. I have always been interested in history. I think that your videos are most informative and very interesting. Thank you so very much for your videos and the time and effort that you take to present them.
I'm glad you are enjoying them.
@@TheHistoryChap Sir, I truly enjoy your videos. There is a man here in America that calls himself THE HISTORY GUY. I find that you both present the most interesting videos of history.
I've always enjoyed history from an early age. I'm 72 now and find that history in all of its forms is very important to be preserved and passed down to the younger generations of our planet. I look forward to your new (and past )videos.
Children in today's world need to be taught history in ALL its forms.
This old YANK thanks you .
Appreciate this very informative video.
Glad you enjoyed it.
Amazing detail about this event in our history. Perhaps a tale about Westminster Palace itself. I find it fascinating that it was also a place of commerce which allowed this to take place. Amazing story well told.
My pleasure. Thanks for watching.
Excellent presentation sir 👍
Many thanks
Thanks Chris, another brilliant story, and one that I knew very little of. My decision not to take history in high school has left me madly catching up. And your videos are brilliant for that, cheers
Thanks for your continued support.
Class.Brilliant presentation of a complicated monarchy.
Thank you. If you enjoy my work then please sign up for my newsletter at www.thehistorychap.com
I mourn the loss of the only man to enter parliament with good intention. Excellent vid, thank you.
Thanks for commenting
Honest intentions, a clear agenda and the means to carry it out.
Deleting comments again
Cromwell did in 1653 and closed it down!
Fantastic!...I just love the history of England which you explain so elegantly well.
I am looking forward to your next enthusiastic presentation on the past.
Glad you enjoyed. Plenty more to come.
Guy Fawkes was christened in the church which is next to York Minster, there are blue plaques in the city commemorating this & where he lived. Thanks Chris, as always you hit the nail on the head! Your enthusiasm keeps us enthralled in the stories from history, another must watch video 👍
He was born in the cottage that is now attached to the pub named after him, close by too.
He was educated at St Peter's, York - which does not celebrate Bonfire Night because, as a former headmaster used to put it, he didn't want to commemorate failure.
Thanks for your support.
So the English history is not only ..Empire's, Afternoon tea and Cakes, is quiet bloodying.
Your videos are excellent...
Excellent narration, to the point, extremely educational !!
Many thanks.
Informative and fascinating. Thanks!
My pleasure. Thanks for watching.
Thanks for another excellent presentation Chris! I always look forward to seeing your history lessons
My pleasure.
WELL DONE CHRIS!YOUR VIDEOS BRIGHTEN MY WEEK,LET ALONE MY DAY!
Margaret, thats very kind, thank you.
Thank you, I enjoyed your story very much. You might consider the story of the two stokers who managed to destroy the Houses of Parliament where Fawkes failed. Take care.
Amazibng that they achieved it without gunpowder. Stupidity reigns!
Very interesting. Thank you for teaching me something new
My pleasure.
It's interesting that today in the UK on any Sunday there are more Catholics in church than Protestants. Many of these are Polish but I think you downplay the extent of Catholic sentiment at the time. Were they ready to take up arms? No but the number of English Catholics today speaks to their numbers in the 17th century.
A great video as usual.
Mark, Thanks for taking the time to comment.
i think you will find that the catholic numbers swelled in the 18th century when the irish came over...you can get a better idea of catholic numbers from the schools in any given area. i live in north manchester and went secondary school(78-83) and there was one catholic high school and 4 C of E /state schools serving the same area and when they built my estate theres one catholic primary and 2 C of E/state schools. hope that helps,plus the facts are most of us who went/go to state schools,rarely,if at all outside weddings and funerals, step foot in a church. imo
Are they freedom fighters or terrorists? Oh boy is that a loaded question.
Up to you to decide.
He nearly killed ALL the politicians, he was without doubt a HERO.
Short answer, Yes
@@philvanderlaan5942 Really? They just wanted to replace the bigoted morons in power, with a similar bunch wearing a different football shirt. Bloody Mary executed more people than the Spanish Inquisition. One lot were as bad as the other.
TERRORISTS IN EVERY WAY!
A point about that priest-hole. A lot of old buildings (16th century and earlier) in Britain have secret hiding spots which exist due to Henry VIII and his persecution of the monasteries. A few more exist from the 18th century during the Civil War (one of many but it's the one we give a The to). The purpose is in the name, these were compartments, rooms or tunnels for persecuted clergy and later royalists to hide in and evade capture. The really lucky royalists during The Civil War had the use of castles, many of which are tragically spited. Corfe Castle in Dorset is a wonderous example of a royalist castle spited by the Parliamentarians, it was destroyed by gunpowder and the enormous chunks of masonry settled upon the hill give a stark and bone-chilling snapshot as to the immense power of such a simple mixture of 4 parts Carbon (charcoal), 2 parts Sulphur and 1 part Saltpetre mixed in wooden casks with wooden balls to help the mixture. No metal was used as this might lead to sparks and the very sudden disappearance of the entire building and occupants therein.
Thanks for sharing your knowledge
Could this be the origin of the phrase: Balls Up ? ; )
I now know way more about this event than I did before, so many thanks for your detailed video. Glad I found your channel. 😃
Glad you enjoyed it.
I always look forward to your uploads. I love history and you always add an element of fun and keep it interesting. Long may it continue!!
Thanks for your support.
Guy Fawkes :- the last person to enter parliament with honourable intentions
Thank you for taking the time to comment.
😂🤣 soooooo true
Thank you for another fascinating episode in history.
Family legend has it that we are descended from Christopher Wright, so it is great to hear the story with the detail and background it deserves.
Interesting family tree. Thanks for sharing.
One of most interesting thing that I have learned from my work with St. Eustacius and St. Thomas with respect to the American Colonial revolution in 1775 is the difficulty of getting gunpowder. I had no idea of how difficult it was to make or get the stuff, even with the British blockade. AND, shipping the gunpowder over water in merchant sail craft, hundreds of tons at a time! Imagine being a captain or any sailor on that boat. No smoking, I’d hope. A great video.
Thanks for sharing your insights.
Just a darn shame they didn't pull it off...... Come back Mr. Fawkes and having had a bit of a practice..... This time , success I pray ......
Thanks for taking the time to comment
Disemboweled before the heart was cut out, & made to watch the intestines burnt.
Pleasant!
Great video Chris, really entertaining and interesting. We could do with some politicians with some heart at the moment!!! Stay well.
Thanks for your continued support.
Thank you Sir for producing another brilliant video. Guy Fawkes and his fellow conspirators for all their elaborate planning. Did not have a chance of success even if they manage blow up parliament and king. And as usual Sir you answered all possibilities. Kudos and bravo. Well done indeed.
:)
Disimboweled after heart cut out? I don’t think they noticed that as they’d be dead
Thank you for taking the time to comment.
@@TheHistoryChap "Thank you for taking the time to comment."
I see you posting this to a lot of replies and very often it comes across as sarcastic, asif you are telling the poster to f-off with their smart-ass remarks.
Once the heart is disconneced the person passes out within seconds and since there is no bloodflow at all anymore they are also dead a few seconds later.
But think about it fora few seconds; you don't just cut out a heart, you first have to open the ribcage and the trauma of that alone will kill most people.
In fact, cutting of the genitals would cause an amount of bleeding that would probably end most people.
Anyway, the whole point of this punishment was to keep the victim alive as long as possible so they most definately did not start with the thing that kills them.
Stop thanking people for comments you don't like, either just ignore them or issue a correction in a pinned post and save us all a lot of frustration.
@@vinny142 No you would not be dead
When first conceived your entrails were meant to be burnt before your living eyes. The theory at that time was that this would prevent you entering into heaven.
Wow! I've watched this video now 3 times. It gets better each time. Thrilling to watch. I'm off to see another video from your channel. Thank you!
Catholic patriots and martyrs, in my eyes. Desperate times call for desperate measures
One persons hero is another person's villain. All about perspectives isn't it?
@@TheHistoryChap Undoubtedly. That’s part of what makes history so fascinating. Thank you for making these great videos.
Violence and killing of innocent people can never be judged as moral.
@@leonidaslantz5249 that depends entirely on your definition of “innocent”. Let’s agree to disagree.
We need them now.
Thanks for taking the time to comment
Entertainment educational video which I found enjoyable thanks for the history lesson.
Glad you enjoyed it, thanks for watching.
Ok, you said it right at the end. I thought you might miss it. That was a great rendition of the Gunpowder Plot and I didn't expect anything less. Thanks for the great History. was looking for some extras and you didn't disappoint. Thanks again Chris.
Tim, thanks for those kind words.
Great video, Chris. I guess this shows the dangers of following a charismatic idealist. One the one hand, they were very brave men. On the other hand, they were prepared to murder women and children. Terrorists or freedom fighters? Depends on your personal view. And let us not forget that a Catholic monarch would have inevitably led to repression and execution of Protestants. SO....They certainly weren't fighting for religious tolerance, but the obverse side of the repression they themselves had been suffering under. My verdict? Guilty as charged. Terrorists.
Thanks for taking the time to comment.
I bet that (if) explosion would not lift the floor an inch nowadays. The big fat arses would absorb it.
Thank you and great video.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts
Although I have known the basics of the story for many years it was interesting to hear the full context for one of the most famous 'incidents ' in our rich history
Glad you enjoyed it.
I can remember being taught this as a thirteen year old at school. Then I was bored. I wish my History teacher had had some of your breathless enthusiasm in his delivery style as I would have remembered more of the details!
Very kind of you.
Real cool, thanks big dog.
My pleasure. Thanks for watching.
Great channel 👍 I love telling history stories to my class and I check my facts with you and get new stuff. I visited Brecon Museum after watching your Zulu content.
Thanks HC!
Might do Gunpowder Plot in assembly… but perhaps not in so much detail of course 👍
But I bet they'd love the Hang, Drawing & Quartering bit !!!
Thanks for your support.
Oh yes!
An interesting contrast with Decent into Darkness' approach.
Thank you
🤣😀🤡 come back Guy Fawkes -- all is forgiven 👍😂😜
Ha ha. I thought someone might say that!
I know some might poo poo what I'm going to say, but you're welcome to debunk me with evidence.
I read somewhere on the web (sorry, I can't remember where), though I would love to have bookmarked the page) that The Gunpowder Plot was a False Flag and the 'plotters' were accidentally discovered.
I wonder, what was their intended outcome? A switch in royal ruler (religion), Government only rule, Rule of anarchy (reserch the 'old' meaning of 'anarchy', not the modern meaning).
It would be very interesting to actually discover the true reason behind the gunpowder plot...
Far better than all the other dreary so called documentaries in the main stream media, keep em coming mate
That's very kind of you.
Anglo-Egyptian War of 1882 next week.
Could do with him nowadays. Could you imagine.....
Don't go there....
Hi Chris, thanks for another wonderful history lesson. The BBC should employ you to present some of their history programs. You present your UA-cam content so well. Why have you not been poached yet?
It would be fun to be poached by the BBC. Until then, I will just keep doing what I love here on UA-cam.
As an American, I highly doubt, if anyone asks me , but if anyone does ask ‘ A penny for the Guy ? ‘ I will insist that it be used irresponsibly .
I used to go out penny for the guy when I was a kid, we found that if we set up outside a tube/ subway station we would earn more money that way as more footfall.
Thanks for taking the time to comment.
That traditional seems to have died very quickly.
I think “penny for the Guy” probably died out in the late 1970’s, early 1980’s. I remember doing it as a young child circa 1978 but since that time I’ve never seen it. Interestingly, a rather harrowing ad campaign in the 1980’s , that warned of the dangers of fireworks, may have somewhat contributed to the decline in the practise of people setting off fireworks in their gardens on Nov 5th. But that’s just my own speculation. In addition, the law regarding the use of fireworks on special occasions is often not understood. Many people in the UK actually believe that it’s illegal to set off fireworks on your own property. That’s actually not the case. Anyway. It’s a much loved tradition that I remember with fondness.
@@robinlee28 we did it outside Farringdon station and made a fortune in pennies back in 67/68/69 then carried on when we moved outside Turnpike Lane Tube station. That’s where the money was Tube stations especially on a Friday when people got paid. I agree with what you said I stopped doing it about mid 70’s had other money making ways like working on the milk rounds and paper delivery rounds.
5th November in Australia when l was a kid was called cracker night,the name given to fireworks,crackers were set off and bonfires lit once the fire brigade turned up at our local paddock as our bonfires got abit out of control,no cracker night now as sale of fireworks banned
Thanks for sharing.
Some people just can't keep their mouth shut .
Thank you for taking the time to comment.
I am a descendant of james this is insane
Thanks for sharing.
I heard of this celebration event during the research on different cultures, it is weird for foregners to see anglo people celebrating a dead terroist who tried blow parliment.
It could of been English 1600s's 9/11 before USA if it does happen but i have notice that historical events has brought itself back.
Thanks for taking the time to comment
Thankyou for yet another informative history lesson.
I look forward to each and every one of your presentations.
That's very kind of you, thanks.
Three more conclusions, Chris: the anti-Catholic legislation later had a knock-on effect on others - mostly Quakers - who refused to take the oaths (sorted largely by Affirmation at the end of the c.17th); worth noting also that fear of creeping Catholicism was a factor in suspicions of Charles I (and his wife!) which would influence the civil wars (and came to fruition with the Glorious Revolution 1688); and finally- Nov. 5th was fhe ONLY holiday for a period in England under the interregnum (including Christmas, I beleive). Quite a tally! (You will excuse me, but as we historians rarely admit " it's actually my period..." 😉).
Thanks for sharing and adding to the discussion
The photograph of the Royal Palace in Madrid is really superb, with the white walls reflecting the red light of the beatiful sunset over the mountains. But...
That is the Royal Palace the Bourbons built in the 18th century over the ruins of the old palace of the Habsburgs, itself made modifying the old 9th century Moslem castle (in Spanish "alcazar", from the Arabic "al Qasr", from the Latin "castrum") the Caliph of al Andalus (Spain and Portugal) ordered to built over the Manzanares river to protect his subjects from the Northern Christian raiders. So now we only can dream of how the old fortress-palace was.
Anyway, by 1605 the Spanish king was Philip III, who had handed over the government of his many kingdoms to his favourite, the duke of Lerma, the epitome of political corruption in Spain.
By 1601 the duke had moved the king's court from Madrid to Valladolid, then a bigger town 100 miles North beyond the mountains. All the aristocrats, the government officials and every person making business or working for the Crown had to move after the court. And there, in Valladolid, the duke of Lerma had previously bought palaces and houses that all of them, even the king, had to buy whatever the price.
So... What about Madrid?
Madrid then wasn't such a big city as it is today, and suddenly became empty of people. But don't worry, because about 1603 the good duke of Lerma arrived to save such a difficult situation. He devised a private, in fact personal, investment plan on real state, buying every house, barn, shop, garden, orchard and little piece of land whose owner was eager, desperate to sell at any price because the demand have vanished 2 years ago and there was no prospect of new business. Even too cheap was better than nothing. And the duke helped those poor real state owners.
Time passed, Fawkes went in and out of History (and life, poor Guy). And...
Suddenly, in 1606 the duke of Lerma realised that those sunsets at Madrid were truly incomparable and in fact much needed, so he ordered that the court moved back to Madrid. Of course the same noble courtiers, civil and military officials, company owners and workers, etc. had to buy or rent again the same houses, barns, shops, gardens, orchards... to their new owner, the crafty duke of Lerma. (I truly meant he was the epitome of corruption, and this was not the worst thing he did to the Spanish people).
Sadly, that magnificent photo of the current Royal Palace does not depict the dwelling of His Royal Majesty Philip III of Castile (and II of Portugal and Aragon and even V of Navarre) at Valladolid in 1605. It was a humbler palace, although not so ancient as the old "alcazar". And even sadder is that the red glare in the palace is not as red as the face of everyone knowing that the mischievous duke of Lerma was not punished or even removed from the government until 15 years later.
Thank you for taking the time to share your knowledge in your in depth post.
Kia Ora Chris. With reference to the attack on Coventry, November 14th, 1940. I was taken to Coventry Cathedral as a child with my Mum and Dad on the way to Scotland for a holiday. To be honest, at the age of 8, living in Oxford, it didn't really mean that much. But now, as a near 60-year-old, it means a lot more. I have two questions for you Sir. Why did Hitler not have any "heavy" bombers to speak of? And why was Oxford not bombed? With reference to the Cowley works? Thank you for some great Videos.
Russ, thanks for your kind words about the video.
Not sure why Oxford wasn't bombed seeing as the Cowley Works were there.
They did target cultural cities such as Norwich, Canterbury & Exeter.
Yet another brilliant and informative video thank you
Thank you.
Regarding the number of Catholics in England in the early 1600's - (Four months after the video was posted I'm afraid.) Does anyone contend that there were FAR more than this video indicated?
Admittedly, a lot of my "history" comes from movies, but it's not as bad as it sounds. I'll see some period piece, think it looks interesting, then will do a bit of research to see if they got anything right in the movie.
So in "Lady Jane" I recall a lot of people were asking "What about Mary?" when Jane was proclaimed Queen. Just a little copy and paste from the Wikipedia article (yes, you don't need to tell me about using Wikipedia as a source) I find that Mary fled to East Anglia where "Many ahderents to the Catholic faith" lived. Shortly thereafter, Northumberland's support collapsed (why?), and Mary "rode triumphantly into London ... on a wave of popular support." So, my impression was that a lot of the poor (which constituted a majority) were Catholic, while the "Protestant" movement was primarily influential people wanting more of the influence that came with redistribution of Catholic property. Or, did people just typically not care about religion but knew Mary should have inherited the throne and didn't trust the kingmakers?
Thanks for taking the time to comment
At 09:29 I was examining the family tree. At the top you mention Sir Richard Throckmorton. This was actually Sir Robert Throckmorton. All of the top row of conspirators appear in my extended family tree too. I also have Thomas Percy from the bottom row, and though I've yet to fit them in, I have the Tyrrwhitt family so will also claim Robert Keyes and Ambrose Rockwood if I can fit them in. All personal links to history, which is why I love genealogy.
Thanks for watching my video & for sharing your very interesting family history..
The pope declared war on England when Henry the 8th left the catholic church and created the church of England.
The pope told all catholic countries to invade England and force them back to being catholic.
Spain was the only country to try.
Guy Fawks was actualy Portuguese.
What on earth are you talking about?
It seem's the gunpowder plot was probably a hare-brained 'conspiracy' that metamorphorsed into a false flag operation,with the king's approval. That might account for why ten days elapsed before the plot was exposed in an apparently melodramatic manner.
It might be that the 'persecution' of catholics was intended to instill greater solidarity between the Scottish & English protestant subjects of king James,if so,with the benefit of hindsight it appears to have been effective.
Thanks for contributing your ideas.
TESCO'S ASDAS,AND SAINBURY'S..LOVE THIS TIME OF THE YEAR THEY SALE FIREWORKS FOR ALL NOVEMBER MONTH.
I ...GO ABROAD FOR SOME TRANQUILLITY
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. Enjoy your travels.
James the 1st of Great Britain, not England.
No he was James VI of Scotland and James I of England. No Great Britain for another 100 years.
I have heard most of your stories before but you have a wonderful way of telling them. Brings new life to history and I much appreciate your hard work and talents
I’m glad you enjoy them. Many thanks.
Very interesting video just a shame most of yours are all so short, I watched this one as its more than 30 minutes most under that I aviod, I like to settle down & watch a documentary not have to chose another every 10/15 minutes😢
Thanks for watching and for your feedback. Unfortunately, most people seem to watch less than 10 minutes of my videos
Very good description and i like your narration style.
In regards to the plot. Though i dont agree with the method i have to admit it was a pretty daring plan.
Time to go and get some fireworks. Have a great bonfire night everyone
Thanks for watching and for taking the time to write your comment
Interesting that Lord Darnley was indeed blown up, but in his case survived & escaped as far as the adjoining orchard where he was caught up with and strangled… The Earl of Bothwell seems to have been a lovely man!
Yes, what a loveable chap...no wonder Mary Queen of Scots fell for him!
Now there’s a subject worthy of exploration! I once visited Stirling Castle and there remains a beautiful French-style window in the castle overlooking a garden. The guide related a story of Mr Bothwell having pushed somebody (I forget who) through the aforesaid window who, considerably worse for wear landed in the garden. When Bothwell was asked by guards what next, he suggested a further trip for the unfortunate, over the castle wall & down the cliff. A loveable chap indeed! Mind you, Darnley (thinking of Ricci’s murder) didn’t seem all that much better. Thanks for your channel - it goes without saying how greatly I enjoy it. Particularly the deft way that you explore seemingly well-known events & show them in a whole new light. More power to you!
Syphilitic Darnley !
See the " rough wooin' culture o' the times!
Prior marital rape was a common solution!
Perhaps better than Henry the 8th 's preference for axe jobs !
James 1st was a Scot and he took over England as King of Scotland as James 6th of Scotland
James 6th of Scotland took over England in 1603 the plot was 1605 when James 6th and 1st was already King.
Thank you
A terminology topic.
The last part the Anglican Church creed is:
“I believe in the Holy Spirit, the holy catholic Church, the communion of saints, the forgiveness of sins, the resurrection of the body, and the life everlasting. Amen.”
This meaning of catholic as in universal.
If written with a capital C as Catholic refers to Roman Catholic.
When spoken, have often thought when first used, it should be as Roman Catholic to avoid confusion.
Should frequent use of catholic be better always phased as Roman Catholic?
Thank you for taking the time to comment
As for the question "Should frequent use of catholic be better always phased as Roman Catholic?" - In my opinion it is not necessary, despite as you imply a lot of "Protestant" denominations (I'm using that term in the broadest possible sense) use the word catholic in the creed, and as Adam pointed out there are numerous rites in "Catholicism" which are not "Roman" Catholic. Given the number of people in the English speaking world today who are basically clueless when it comes to religion - it's generally understood "Catholic" refers to the Roman Catholic Church. Anyone referring to any of the other rites will generally specify to which non Roman Catholic church they refer. Any Protestants using the word catholic (meaning universal) in the Nicean Creed and knowing they're not Roman Catholic should already know what that word with the little "c" means.
"King of England". Pandering to American viewers perhaps?
He was king of England. He was seperately also king of Scotland. The plot was by Englishmen to get rid of their king. They didn't give a hoot about what was happening in Scotland.
@@TheHistoryChap thanks for the clarification,
@The History Chap >>> 👍👍
Gosh you are binge watching my videos.
Sir, the story of Gunpowder plot presented by you, is the best and most informative. Gunpowder plot is somewhat my 'hobby horse' and I have to say that no sufficient detail of the event was missing. I was lucky enough to spend overnight at Coombe Abbey, where I found out about Princess Elizabeth who had been living there from 1603 till 1608. So, once again, thank you so much - you are extremely knowledgeable person.
Thanks for watching my video, glad you enjoyed it.
You can house a family of 4 in just one of the hats they wore back then.
Laughing.
How did catesby know about the letter? Who tipped him off about the tip off?!
Btw I’m pathetically pedantic and faceless so I’m going to point out there’s 17 years between the armada and gunpowder plot
He was tipped off by another servant in Monteagle’s household. Don’t forget that Monteagle’s serrated we’re Catholic.
Gunpowder, Treason and Plot.
Indeed!
It is a refreshing change to hear somebody clearly stating that the King was the target, and that this was for religious reasons. It gets rather tedious to continually have to listen to the notion that Guy Fawkes is somehow a symbol of anti-corruption, and that his sole aim was to bring justice to duplicitous politicians.
I live in the N Yorkshire town of Knaresborough. 1 mile away is the village of Scotton. In Scotton you can drink at the pub,..."The Guy Fawkes". Although it is claimed that Fawkes was born in Stonegate, York, the people of Scotton KNOW that Fawkes was from Scotton. This is backed up by the fact that the local school, King James' School (1616), was founded on the orders of King James, because he wanted to ensure that the parish did not produce another Guy Fawkes.
Difficult to know the real truth of any of this,.....(you try telling a Yorkshireman that he is wrong about anything).
Any thoughts on this Mr Green?
Oh, and as to terrorist or freedom-fighter.......although it is a title reserved for those of a different faith, religious fanatics who leave their own lands to fight a religious war in another country are Jihadi. Not entirely the correct label for Fawkes, but the closest to the spirit of it all in my humble opinion.
Thanks for adding that really interesting post. I have heard both locations but I haven't done enough research to confirm one over the other.
It would have saved the Tories a lot of trouble.
Thanks for taking the time to comment.
He's remembered because they made a poem about him
Thank you for taking the time to comment.
As you would probably say, don't use a match to check the petrol. Me, being from the other side of the pond, am really glad you put this out? Still not sure if he was just the scapegoat, because all the others were dealt with, so I'm still kinda confused as to why just Guy Fawkes only is rememered.
I agree that it is strange that only his name is remembered.
Another super presentation. Have u ever been to lewes for their multiple fireworks and bonfires very interesting....thanX again
Unfortunately not
Who were they fighting for ? Quite simply, religious zealotry. Another example of the tens of thousands of times that religion has resulted in the innumerable deaths, misery and and suffering of innocent people. Religion is fine ; fanatasism is not.
Thank you for taking the time to comment.
That last line was funny! Lol😂
Thanks for watching my video
Fawkes must have been the originator of the phrase..."Go Big or Go Home!"
:)
He had a great idea where’s he living ?
Thank you for taking the time to comment
I've always wondered who the Guy was.
Thanks for posting this.
My pleasure. Thanks for watching.
James 1 was the King of England was he??
He was indeed. Just to confuse things he was also King James VI of Scotland
@@TheHistoryChap I was pulling your leg. James was king of the whole UK of the era.😁
Chap. Another great video. These laws remind me of the penal laws in Ireland after the williamite wars.
Thanks. Unfortunately, history does repeat itself.
It's all too easy to view history without considering what went before. From the days of Wycliffe through to Tyndale. There was frightful persecution of Christians who simply believed the Bible and rejected Roman Catholic claims to supremacy over everything related to belief. Your history is normally very good but the absence of information about the Roman Catholic behaviour with the Dominican Inquisition, including their 'crusade' against the Waldensians and Albigenses. An overview of Catholic power in the Middle Ages is needed. England actually did not suffer as much as the Europeans did under Catholic oppression. The English had enough of Catholic power and decided they did not want a Catholic monarch ever again. This whole saga had a massive role in the development Englands great democracy. Too many modern, evolution-believing historians downplay the role that religion v. Biblical Christianity played in England. Too much is placed on Henry VIII and his games. Esp. passions for the Bible in England.
Thank you for taking the time to comment.
Another greàt video, I really enjoyed this as always
My pleasure
Fascinating!
Thanks for watching.
Amazing video as always sir. I love how they used to dress.
Glad you enjoyed.
Was that in James that they coined the Bible translation of the King James Bible after
Yes it was.
Ignoramus maximus!
Yay
Thanks for taking the time to comment.
THANKS ! THE HISTORY CHAP . GREAT STORY . FROM U.K. (2022).
Glad you enjoyed.
This is all a great example of why Royalty and Religion should both be banned for the sake of Humanity !
Only your royalty and your religion
Thanks for taking the time to comment.
"Just in case you survive having your heart cut out..."
:)
if they had managed to set it off then wouldn't there have been burning firewood coming down all over the place along with any human remains?
a shocking thought
That is a shocking thought.
Literarly "disoving the Parliament"....
I think I'm right in saying, until only recently a Catholic could not be King or Queen.
Still can't.
@@TheHistoryChap Good. FTP
Still cannot be !
Remember remember....a great English tradition. How long before thats taken away from us?
Hopefully a long, long time.
Excellent, thank you.
You are welcome!
I’m American and my people were early English Colonists to America. I understand about the Catholic versus Protestant thing . The Stewart’s were terrible Monarchs in my opinion . And the later Monarchs were also just as bad. I’m pretty sure the last good Monarch was Alfred the Great
Maybe that is why he is called "The Great"?
I like Henry I as well,....simply because he promoted the Tally Stick system.
I disagree... Elizabeth I, Charles II, Victoria , George VI ,and Elizabeth II ,were quite good monarchs who helped their people and their kingdom through difficult times . From another American of British ancestry 🇬🇧
Actually , I think Henry V was a great English King. He had some issues but he was a brave King in Battle. Anyone who could survive getting an arrow stuck in your face gets my respect
@@fabiosplendido9536 Now that is funny. But Cavemen had Tally Sticks way before the Stewarts