I might have needed to watch this video for a class, but this was so interesting it held my attention the entire time This is the kind of educational content I could watch just for fun!
@@andanssas I would be interested. Which video is it? Do you have it in the YT history? There are some AMAs or interviews, some are 3+ hours long. It is not really actionable information ;) If it takes you too long to find, don't bother ;)
You did learn about natural selection in high school, right? I’m actually very interested in evolutionary biology, & this video is pretty nostalgic to me
Lighting up the mood (and the main subject), lots of additional details were added in his recent #mindscape88 interview with Sean Carroll. New information is not incompatible with one's beliefs, so you might keep your mind open ;)
Dr Shubin had made a monumental discovery...he's contributed a great deal toward a full understanding of the origins of tetrapods, among other forms. Thank you! Great video!
This was a highly educational video! I've been looking for ages on how a dig site is actually found and excavated and I finally have the info that I've been looking for!
I love this guy Neil ..... I read his book when it first came out: He can certainly stand behind anything he says! Happy to see how much he enjoyed "the process" of finding Tik, albeit - it wasn’t always so easy.
Beautiful! The mutant legged fish coming onto land is a symbol of ventures into new (geographic and psychological) territories. And when the legged fish crossed the border from water to land, it didn't even get a visa first. ;-)
I'm only in middle school and I'm watching this for science class, but it's a type of video that I would just watch for fun because *the study of animals and adaption of creatures if friggin AMAZING.*
I can so much relate to Neil Shubin and Tiktaalik. Not the least because I'm living near a paleontological site that made history as well, the Neander valley (in German: Neandertal) where the first Neanderthals were found. What is still more amazing and barely anyone knows (apart from some local geologists): The limerocks in the Neander valley formed during the time when Tiktaalik lived, around 380 million years ago in the Middle Devonian. So the coral fossils that I have in my book shelf are exactly of that age. Everytime I have them in my hands I think of Neil Shubin and Tiktaalik.
I am so glad to be living in a time when we have a handle on the development of species; we can make sense of present day diversity and trace back that development to its origins. It was 40 years ago when I first read Darwin's origin of species (on a Philosophy course, lol). It took time and the help of others to synthesize its contents and develop my understanding. I am enormously grateful for the work of scientists (Darwin himself and those that followed up his work). I am not sure I have the patience for such work, but I do love the results. I feel that that people such as these have rescued us from the magical 'explanations' with which were stuck with for so long.
This is why having a good science education is crucial in the modern world. I’m glad that evolution is taught where I live, & that I learned it through the internet growing up.
We find living things organized into groups that are themselves organized into groups. Every significant way that a lungfishes body is similar to a humans body, a frogs body is similar to ours in all those same ways but also in several more ways. And every significant way that a frogs body is similar to ours, a platypuses body is similar to ours in all those same ways, but then also in several more ways. And in every significant way a platypuses body is similar to ours, an opossums body is similar in all the same ways but also in several more ways. And I’m most significant ways an opossums body is similar to ours, a lions body is similar to ours in all those same ways but also in several more ways. And every significant way a lions body is similar to ours, a lemurs body is similar to ours in all those same ways but also in several more ways. And in every significant way a lemurs body is similar to ours, a baboons body is similar in all those same ways but also in a few other ways as well. And in every significant way that a baboons body is similar to ours, a gibbons body is similar to ours in all the same ways but several more ways as well. And in most significant ways a gibbons body is similar to ours, a bonobos body is similar in all those same ways but then also similar in a few other significant ways as well.
No...all tetrapods are descendants of fish. DESCENDANTS are not exactly like their ancestors. What he's showing is where the one bone, two bones, many bones, digits pattern for limbs came from. 0
Pretty much...Tetrapod evolution's pretty much been the story of "Pimp My Fish". Technically you can go further back than just tetrapodal vertebrates..But "Pimp my Eukaryote Cell" doesn't roll so trippingly off the tongue,and gives too many possible options ;)
Jeanette York the usage in day-to-day categories is different from in cladistics - day-to-day a rabbit isn't a fish, but evolutionarily a rabbits are a sub-sub-sub-....-sub-group of a particular type of fish and is therefore a fish.
Great Question. Dr. Shubin is holding a cast/reproduction in the video. This is very helpful for teaching purposes. The original type specimen would be much too fragile.
If they want to know why or what motivated the Tiktaalik behaviors, cross compare that to a Snakehead fish or any number of such fish that can and do crawl out of the water, use their fins like feet, care for their young and what causes them to go on land in the first place. Mysteries over and its simple. Its also not the only"fish with those features. Take how everyone was making claims about coelacanth fish as the ancestor of all land animals. Everyone claimed they were extinct millions of years ago and now we see there are two species of them that still exist and they do not walk on land. Look at whales that are said not to have started in the water but on land and that is only claimed because whales still exist. The reality is things have been moving to and from the land and water since life began. worms were among the first species and they were and are found in all bodies of water, a rare species in ice called ice worms and in the soil. We have insects in water and on land as well that are said to have evolved from worms and another line evolved into fish, etc. They ignore the fact that kind of evolution in the water was occurring on the land as well and the have no clear evidence because worms don't fossilize well due to soft tissues Yet they dont acknowledge land insects could have evolved on the land from land based worms? And worms evolved from what, and those evolved from what? Germs. And germs are found everywhere as well even in deep rock, still alive and doing all their little microbial stuff. SO tracing all life to one source is trying to force a linear structure into a "tree" and ignoring its many roots, but also ignoring the fact life does not fork out and follow a tree pattern. Its chaotic, and is more like a tangled web with no single point and having many innumerable cross points back and forth at different times for all sorts of diverse and known as well as unknown reasons. Even if we look just at the related human ancestors and cousin species, there have been many changes, cross sectioning, extinctions, and so forth of so called evolution and devolution.
How do you explain the Cambrian period then when many groups of animals suddenly appeared full formed out of nowhere? There was no transitioning from anything that had gone before. So it is not true to say that evolution accounts for how animals evolved in small incremental changes and steps since there are no transitional fossils before various groups of animals appeared already fully formed.
really simple actually Ro. Precambrian fossils do exist, they are just MUCH rarer because mineralized tissue (the part of animals that fossilizes well) did not really exist in the animals of that period. The Cambrian explosion is not animals "appearing", it is just them evolving from animals which did not fossilize well and thus are very rare in the fossil record. Hence the lack of transitional forms.
I still strongly believe the natures target animal was a bird not the four legged creature. The animal design of heart & lungs coordination with rib cage expansion and pulling in air with every stroke during all stages of flight does not match to any other movement so perfectly plus the the control of flight through end of wing digits and perching on branches n hunting animals and bringing to mouth to bite is not as perfect elsewhere as in bird life. We gets feet spasm by trying to grab something in fear or pleasure also resemble birds. I think we’re wrongly trying to prove the evolution backward or by matching the pictures we found instead of looking at the bigger picture of reading the mind of the creator. “It” might have wanted the bird and not the fish, frog or monkey! Think about it! Mhmd!
Frogger 81 Carbon dating is unreliable for things that are old. Radiometric dating is the big umbrella, and that disproves it if you use certain elements. Radiometric dating isn't the only thing you can use, though. I have a question: If all of the animals were created at the same time/day, then why do we find that the layers of the earth separate the fossils between time?
Satan is a lie created by uneducated, superstitious Pagans with an agenda. First, they scare you, and keep you in fear. Then they offer you a safety net and protection. If you follow their rules, and tithe faithfully, they'll keep that bad ol' Devil away. If you give them more, you're even holier and get better protection. It's all about money. Your money to them to keep the fear at a low level. If you stray and don't give them enough money, well then Lucifer starts nipping at your toes again.
Why would would god or satan put so much effort into creating this “lie” when most people will never notice? Also we can apply our knowledge of evolutionary biology to other fields, such as creating new medicine & determining how closely related particular species are. But you can’t do that with creationism, its always “evolution is just a theory” & about proving an entire field of science false
If I'm God's chosen, why create me after 4.5 Billion years? Why create me about 500 Million years after multicell life began? If we need God to create us, who created God? And what gave God the knowledge of physics? And if God doesn't need other thing to create him, then the same can be said of us. And if we had two mouths and only one ear...where's the problem there?
Basically, it comes down to a pattern. From the start, for those that believe the creation of the universe came about by natural means have set their pattern. Their pattern to believe in the impossible. They set their pattern for no matter how illogical and unscientific it is, they'll still accept it. We all do stupid things. Hopefully, we admit them and learn from them. It's not a matter of who's smarter; it's a matter of who loves truth more. For those that don't love truth, you can find reasons to believe anything; you'll find excuses for what you want to believe. For others though, like myself, I don't care what I want to believe. I care about what I should believe and why. It's easier said than done, but in the end well worth it. I just don't want to remain stupid.
Shubin is so enthusiastic, and it is contagious.
Yes,God bless him.
I might have needed to watch this video for a class, but this was so interesting it held my attention the entire time
This is the kind of educational content I could watch just for fun!
If you are going to present this subject, hear his recent #mindscape interview with Sean Carroll, lots of additional details there!
@@andanssas I would be interested. Which video is it? Do you have it in the YT history? There are some AMAs or interviews, some are 3+ hours long. It is not really actionable information ;) If it takes you too long to find, don't bother ;)
Where was the "educational content"? You do realize that "Evolution hasn't been observed while it's happening", don't you?
You did learn about natural selection in high school, right?
I’m actually very interested in evolutionary biology, & this video is pretty nostalgic to me
...and this is why I love science. Thank you. This is vital information for us all.
Jim Wills awww. so sad. i pity you. open your eyes. quit being brainwashed. god isn’t real.
Lighting up the mood (and the main subject), lots of additional details were added in his recent #mindscape88 interview with Sean Carroll. New information is not incompatible with one's beliefs, so you might keep your mind open ;)
Dr Shubin had made a monumental discovery...he's contributed a great deal toward a full understanding of the origins of tetrapods, among other forms. Thank you! Great video!
the enthusiasm is infectious.
How fortunate that the find was led by such a personable and likeable guy! So full of joy of the world and all it's treasures.
Wow, I'm slowly understanding. Dr Shubin HiT the JACKPOT of Paleontology.
Thank you - what a privilege it is to live in a time when science is so accessible. Fabulous video from a brilliant scientist
This was a highly educational video! I've been looking for ages on how a dig site is actually found and excavated and I finally have the info that I've been looking for!
"Evolution hasn't been observed while it's happening".
That means it fails the scientific method.
Just the VERY BEST. Neil Shubin shows us all why Bio is so awesome!!
I love this guy Neil ..... I read his book when it first came out: He can certainly stand behind anything he says! Happy to see how much he enjoyed "the process" of finding Tik, albeit - it wasn’t always so easy.
he says we stand upright but the irony is we are all sitting down.
hahaha 😂😂😂
thank You for that. It woke my brain up after 6 hours of studying.
#finalsweek
Yes, and barely even sitting up!
ahahah
This is why you get bullied.
@Alejandro Carreon don't think that's a valid insult but ok..
Beautiful! The mutant legged fish coming onto land is a symbol of ventures into new (geographic and psychological) territories. And when the legged fish crossed the border from water to land, it didn't even get a visa first. ;-)
I'm only in middle school and I'm watching this for science class, but it's a type of video that I would just watch for fun because *the study of animals and adaption of creatures if friggin AMAZING.*
Who else is watching this for homework in quarantine??
Watching for fun. You probably graduated by now. Congrats friend.
4 years after the VID
Tiktaalik sure looks like a happy go-lucky li'l water critter. Kind of like a mata mata with that big grin.
Dr. Shubin went out on a “limb” and it paid off!
Tetrapod humor 😅
I can so much relate to Neil Shubin and Tiktaalik. Not the least because I'm living near a paleontological site that made history as well, the Neander valley (in German: Neandertal) where the first Neanderthals were found.
What is still more amazing and barely anyone knows (apart from some local geologists): The limerocks in the Neander valley formed during the time when Tiktaalik lived, around 380 million years ago in the Middle Devonian. So the coral fossils that I have in my book shelf are exactly of that age. Everytime I have them in my hands I think of Neil Shubin and Tiktaalik.
Love programs like this.
The next man I marry must be as enthusiastic as this guy:))
funny
I am so glad to be living in a time when we have a handle on the development of species; we can make sense of present day diversity and trace back that development to its origins. It was 40 years ago when I first read Darwin's origin of species (on a Philosophy course, lol). It took time and the help of others to synthesize its contents and develop my understanding. I am enormously grateful for the work of scientists (Darwin himself and those that followed up his work). I am not sure I have the patience for such work, but I do love the results.
I feel that that people such as these have rescued us from the magical 'explanations' with which were stuck with for so long.
Everything on earth originated when Jesus spoke it into existence roughly 6,000 years ago.
@@earlysda that’s a load of bs and you know it lol
Interesting and well presented with a pleasant and knowledgeable narrator
Outstanding video. Thanks. Almost fell out of my chair when I saw the bear protection. Hahaha. Everybody is so PC anymore. Good job.
You don't mess around when it comes to bears.
Hardly anyone is that PC. You may be infuenced by media that gives a false perception of most peoples mentalities (aka politically ideological)
This is why having a good science education is crucial in the modern world.
I’m glad that evolution is taught where I live, & that I learned it through the internet growing up.
Professor Shubin, You are a great scientist 👌👌
of course he is, better than the Rahbar million times!
great video, I learned alot by watching it, many things that I didnt even have an idea about! niiiiceee
🙂🙂🙃🙂
thank you
imagine- there are spectacular fossils of all sorts all over the earth that we will never find..
I'm watching these for fun actually
Great content on this channel!
Glad you enjoy it!
Great video!
Watched all of it
WOW to the knowledgde and video skills!!!!
Glad you liked it!
the sassy lil walk of the animated tetrapod
Neil Shubin! MA MAN NEIL!
We find living things organized into groups that are themselves organized into groups. Every significant way that a lungfishes body is similar to a humans body, a frogs body is similar to ours in all those same ways but also in several more ways. And every significant way that a frogs body is similar to ours, a platypuses body is similar to ours in all those same ways, but then also in several more ways. And in every significant way a platypuses body is similar to ours, an opossums body is similar in all the same ways but also in several more ways. And I’m most significant ways an opossums body is similar to ours, a lions body is similar to ours in all those same ways but also in several more ways. And every significant way a lions body is similar to ours, a lemurs body is similar to ours in all those same ways but also in several more ways. And in every significant way a lemurs body is similar to ours, a baboons body is similar in all those same ways but also in a few other ways as well. And in every significant way that a baboons body is similar to ours, a gibbons body is similar to ours in all the same ways but several more ways as well. And in most significant ways a gibbons body is similar to ours, a bonobos body is similar in all those same ways but then also similar in a few other significant ways as well.
brilliant video keep it up!
Very interesting stuff
Glad you think so!
Birds are dinosaurs
3:51 that is called 'The Principal of Faunal Succession'.
Grandkids will see this later today.
I am here from school lol
Those looking for updates, lots of additional details were added in his recent #mindscape88 interview with Sean Carroll. Cheers!
The most insane thing is that when everyone called darwin crazy the proof was waiting to be discovered in the ground.
건국대 수의예과 1학년 동물학 수강자 여러분 모두 화이팅하세요~!
awesome
Kenn Borek Air, the "Mighty Worker" of high latitude flying services!
👏 amazing
so, we are all fish....my dog is a fish, myself is a fish, my chickens in the backyard are fish....dang lol
No...all tetrapods are descendants of fish. DESCENDANTS are not exactly like their ancestors. What he's showing is where the one bone, two bones, many bones, digits pattern for limbs came from. 0
Pretty much...Tetrapod evolution's pretty much been the story of "Pimp My Fish". Technically you can go further back than just tetrapodal vertebrates..But "Pimp my Eukaryote Cell" doesn't roll so trippingly off the tongue,and gives too many possible options ;)
Nancy Cousintine - I'm going to start calling it Darwin's Theory of Pimp My Fish
Jeanette York the usage in day-to-day categories is different from in cladistics - day-to-day a rabbit isn't a fish, but evolutionarily a rabbits are a sub-sub-sub-....-sub-group of a particular type of fish and is therefore a fish.
@@1984potionlover "Pimp My Prokaryote" has a ring to it though.
How could an animal get more complex than tetrapodal vertebrates?
Jason who ?
it's 5 year already, but why is he holding that Tiktaalik like that?
Great Question. Dr. Shubin is holding a cast/reproduction in the video. This is very helpful for teaching purposes. The original type specimen would be much too fragile.
Anyone else have to watch this for class?
Isn't it Andrias davidianus?
IS THAT A SHOTGUN!!!!!!!!!! 7:45
Bear country!
@@biointeractive oh
Mossberg 500 or Remington 870
dr is strapped
& we in to space..wow!
All life land animals come from fish
No, 4 limbed vertebrates come from fish, all invertebrates come from their watery ancestors
If these people knew about metamorphosis or if they got to see a platypus... I think their heads would explode. ...
Yay!
Re piola el video
So we come from a sort of salamander
Snakes and whales are tetrapods :)
Sir this type fish my hous
The first colonisers.
were all related to a fish lmao
It looks like a Gar Fish
👍👍
If they want to know why or what motivated the Tiktaalik behaviors, cross compare that to a Snakehead fish or any number of such fish that can and do crawl out of the water, use their fins like feet, care for their young and what causes them to go on land in the first place. Mysteries over and its simple. Its also not the only"fish with those features. Take how everyone was making claims about coelacanth fish as the ancestor of all land animals. Everyone claimed they were extinct millions of years ago and now we see there are two species of them that still exist and they do not walk on land. Look at whales that are said not to have started in the water but on land and that is only claimed because whales still exist. The reality is things have been moving to and from the land and water since life began. worms were among the first species and they were and are found in all bodies of water, a rare species in ice called ice worms and in the soil. We have insects in water and on land as well that are said to have evolved from worms and another line evolved into fish, etc. They ignore the fact that kind of evolution in the water was occurring on the land as well and the have no clear evidence because worms don't fossilize well due to soft tissues Yet they dont acknowledge land insects could have evolved on the land from land based worms? And worms evolved from what, and those evolved from what? Germs. And germs are found everywhere as well even in deep rock, still alive and doing all their little microbial stuff. SO tracing all life to one source is trying to force a linear structure into a "tree" and ignoring its many roots, but also ignoring the fact life does not fork out and follow a tree pattern. Its chaotic, and is more like a tangled web with no single point and having many innumerable cross points back and forth at different times for all sorts of diverse and known as well as unknown reasons. Even if we look just at the related human ancestors and cousin species, there have been many changes, cross sectioning, extinctions, and so forth of so called evolution and devolution.
Ok, but where are the transitional fossils?
You mean, like Tiktaalik?...
0:57 MORE LIKE “HE BALDLY PREDICTED” AHAHAHA
Denise Thasder well done...
So much effort when you just have to pick up an old book and find out whatever is necessary to know.. ;)
reminds me of a crocodile
show
I love his desire and enthusiasm. However, he just discovered another animal.
i mean yea.
its another animal.
just happens to be that this animal is possible candidate for being ancestor of all four limbed animals
Hello world!
Online classes?
Who's here from science class
Not funny. Also didn’t laugh
😡 Each SPECIES of animal . . . ! Correct vocabulary is essential in scientific presentations, as elsewhere. Deduct ten marks for carelessness.
who is here for science class?
sHouToUt tO miDdLe sChOol kIdS wAtcHiNg tHiS
I like fish sticks.
Can we please depict Darwin as a more attractive person!? I can't stand to look at the character you guys created. :P
"The origin of four-legged animals"
They were popped into existence by a genius.
How do you explain the Cambrian period then when many groups of animals suddenly appeared full formed out of nowhere? There was no transitioning from anything that had gone before. So it is not true to say that evolution accounts for how animals evolved in small incremental changes and steps since there are no transitional fossils before various groups of animals appeared already fully formed.
The Cambrian animals evolved from Precambrian animals . What you see during the Cambrian is the evolution of hard body parts
@@JimofTheLionKings Speaking of "propaganda" how's that book of fables you worship, the bible?
really simple actually Ro. Precambrian fossils do exist, they are just MUCH rarer because mineralized tissue (the part of animals that fossilizes well) did not really exist in the animals of that period.
The Cambrian explosion is not animals "appearing", it is just them evolving from animals which did not fossilize well and thus are very rare in the fossil record. Hence the lack of transitional forms.
I still strongly believe the natures target animal was a bird not the four legged creature. The animal design of heart & lungs coordination with rib cage expansion and pulling in air with every stroke during all stages of flight does not match to any other movement so perfectly plus the the control of flight through end of wing digits and perching on branches n hunting animals and bringing to mouth to bite is not as perfect elsewhere as in bird life. We gets feet spasm by trying to grab something in fear or pleasure also resemble birds. I think we’re wrongly trying to prove the evolution backward or by matching the pictures we found instead of looking at the bigger picture of reading the mind of the creator. “It” might have wanted the bird and not the fish, frog or monkey! Think about it! Mhmd!
Your lies do not refute Evolution.
Evolution is a lie created by Satan" is a lie created by creationists. Oops, I forgot to put the opening quotation mark.
answersingenesis.org/geology/carbon-14/doesnt-carbon-14-dating-disprove-the-bible/
Frogger 81 Carbon dating is unreliable for things that are old. Radiometric dating is the big umbrella, and that disproves it if you use certain elements. Radiometric dating isn't the only thing you can use, though. I have a question: If all of the animals were created at the same time/day, then why do we find that the layers of the earth separate the fossils between time?
Satan is a lie created by uneducated, superstitious Pagans with an agenda. First, they scare you, and keep you in fear. Then they offer you a safety net and protection. If you follow their rules, and tithe faithfully, they'll keep that bad ol' Devil away. If you give them more, you're even holier and get better protection. It's all about money. Your money to them to keep the fear at a low level. If you stray and don't give them enough money, well then Lucifer starts nipping at your toes again.
Why would would god or satan put so much effort into creating this “lie” when most people will never notice?
Also we can apply our knowledge of evolutionary biology to other fields, such as creating new medicine & determining how closely related particular species are.
But you can’t do that with creationism, its always “evolution is just a theory” & about proving an entire field of science false
Jesus Christ is the only way to heaven ✝️
Ok… I’m not sure why that would justify denying a cornerstone of modern biology & genetics tho…
You can still believe in god & accept evolution tho
who wants the answers for 8th grade science lol
Ken Ham has different explanation
Yeah they're different all right.
Good that we don´t have two mouths…and only one ear… WHYYYY do you not see the Designer behind the design??
We have a practical form because natural selection necessitates one
If I'm God's chosen, why create me after 4.5 Billion years? Why create me about 500 Million years after multicell life began?
If we need God to create us, who created God? And what gave God the knowledge of physics? And if God doesn't need other thing to create him, then the same can be said of us.
And if we had two mouths and only one ear...where's the problem there?
Lack of evidence supporting their existence.
H
Basically, it comes down to a pattern. From the start, for those that believe the creation of the universe came about by natural means have set their pattern. Their pattern to believe in the impossible. They set their pattern for no matter how illogical and unscientific it is, they'll still accept it. We all do stupid things. Hopefully, we admit them and learn from them. It's not a matter of who's smarter; it's a matter of who loves truth more. For those that don't love truth, you can find reasons to believe anything; you'll find excuses for what you want to believe. For others though, like myself, I don't care what I want to believe. I care about what I should believe and why. It's easier said than done, but in the end well worth it. I just don't want to remain stupid.
How is a natural explanation impossible?
I would also like to know how a natural explanation is impossible? Everything else we have ever observed has turned out to have a natural explanation.