Navigating Home: How WWII Pilots Found Their Way Back to the Carriers

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 лип 2024
  • Hello aviation fans
    I would like to introduce you to the principles of the YZ-RB system, which helped American pilots find their way back to their home aircraft carrier. As always, I used 3D visuals to explain. I hope you will enjoy the video. I wish you an enjoyable viewing experience and would appreciate your comments and subscriptions
    All models and animations done in Blender 3.0 / Autodesk Maya
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 423

  • @BP-1988
    @BP-1988 24 дні тому +347

    My father was an SBD pilot and flew missions from the USS Hornet (CV8) and the USS Lexington (CV16) during WWII. The YZ-RB system served him well on his scouting patrols, raids on Japanese installations as well as during the battles of Midway, Santa Cruz and the Philippine Sea which got him back to his carrier. The only time he got "lost" and had to ditch off the shores of a remote island was when the USS Wasp was sunk in September of 1942. His carrier, the USS Hornet, was alerted when the Wasp was torpedoed. They asked for their pilots to volunteer to fly their planes to Navy's base at Espiritu Santo to make room for Wasp's planes to land. He and the other volunteers were given faulty coordinates. (No YZ-RB was available to guide them to Espiritu Santo.) He and his gunner spent two week on the remote island with a French planter and his family before being rescued by a PBY.

    • @x-planed
      @x-planed  24 дні тому +56

      Now that’s a story. Thanks for sharing

    • @williamcanfield2889
      @williamcanfield2889 24 дні тому +39

      My father also flew the SBD with VS-67 and spent time on Esperitu Santo as well. His squadron deployed in mid43 from CA and returned in late 44 in order train on the F6F in prep for the invasion of the home islands. He said that a night landing on a carrier was terrifying! He came home to my Mom but never flew again. Earning his Navy Wings of Gold (which I still have) was one of the most important things he ever did.

    • @BP-1988
      @BP-1988 24 дні тому +3

      @@williamcanfield2889 What carrier(s) was he on?

    • @williamcanfield2889
      @williamcanfield2889 24 дні тому

      He was carrier qualified but his squadron, VS-67 was always land-based, initially at NAS Nandi (Suva, Fiji in 43) and then island hopping north up the Solomon Islands chain. They initially flew the OS2U (Kingfisher) and then the SBD-5 in anti submarine and anti troop transport interdictions as the Japs were trying to maintain their presence in the Solomons.

    • @duartesimoes508
      @duartesimoes508 22 дні тому +7

      I bet they became sick of bananas for the rest of their lifes! 😄

  • @frankanderson4176
    @frankanderson4176 24 дні тому +156

    Many have wondered how pilots found their way back without the enemy knowing, too. Great video.

    • @kingfisher7960
      @kingfisher7960 21 день тому +1

      Its not as hard as this video makes it seem. They had an area the ship was expected to be in and once in range they could find it pretty easily with radios.

    • @stijnvandamme76
      @stijnvandamme76 19 днів тому +6

      IT does not explain why the japs could not use a radio direction finder to find the source of the transmissions.
      It only explains how the USN planes did not rely on RDF antennas not why the japs did not try to use RDF.

    • @ryanm4013
      @ryanm4013 17 днів тому

      @@stijnvandamme76The Japs were NOT known for their wartime innovation. That would have required a lot of time testing and funds to implement that they didn’t have as the war went on.

    • @marcdevries9027
      @marcdevries9027 17 днів тому +3

      @@kingfisher7960 The easy method with radios is extremely dangerous. This video unfortunately does not explain why the Navy developed this system. (which suggest the person making the video does not know).
      You do not want to broadcast your position to prevent enemies from determining where you are. So a continuous signal for which you can detect the source of the transmission is out of the question. It might not just lead your own planes back to your carrier, but also enemy planes. And broadcast your position to submarines etc.
      This system was made so that your own planes can determine roughly where you are, but the enemy cannot. The signal is too short to determine the source of the transmission. The enemy would hear it, but not know what the signal meant and thus not be able to determine the source. Even if they figured out how it worked, you could easily change the characters, so they would be pointed the wrong way.

    • @00kt86
      @00kt86 17 днів тому

      @@marcdevries9027 That's what I was thinking also.

  • @gearhead366
    @gearhead366 24 дні тому +132

    The Japanese pilots wondered how the American pilots got back to their carriers. How did the Japanese get back to theirs?

    • @jchan3358
      @jchan3358 24 дні тому +21

      I was going to ask the same thing

    • @jiyushugi1085
      @jiyushugi1085 23 дні тому +17

      Many of them didn't.... After the PH attack, a line of dye markers were dropped on the ocean surface at the post-attack gathering spot indicating the compass heading the pilots were supposed to follow to their carriers.

    • @mikaleppakoski5113
      @mikaleppakoski5113 23 дні тому +21

      They didn't. Their carriers were sank

    • @119jle
      @119jle 22 дні тому +9

      Kamakazi didn’t care

    • @anthonycavalliotis8736
      @anthonycavalliotis8736 21 день тому +2

      ​@@119jleThat's Cold Man.

  • @ellieprice3396
    @ellieprice3396 19 днів тому +30

    My brother-in-law was a radio operator on the USS Hancock from early 1944 until the end of the war. The Hancock was hit many times by Kamikazes, especially during the battle for Okinawa. After the worst battles many fighters were low on fuel and needed to find the carrier and land at night. The situation was so desperate the Hancock turned its full landing lights on, (strictly forbidden in wartime) to help them land. Many didn't make it and ditched in the ocean. If a damaged fighter couldn't be moved off the deck it was pushed overboard to allow room for others to land. Desperate times require desperate measures.

    • @philgiglio7922
      @philgiglio7922 18 днів тому +2

      The aircrews were forever grateful for the admiral who made that decision.

  • @Dzordzikk
    @Dzordzikk 24 дні тому +73

    I was read many WWII books but this info is a totally new for me. Thx.

    • @mothmagic1
      @mothmagic1 24 дні тому +6

      Me too, it's something no books mention.

    • @johnfox2483
      @johnfox2483 13 днів тому

      It's quite normal - system was probably highly classified - even 50 years after a war :-)

  • @chuckguy5815
    @chuckguy5815 10 днів тому +8

    I have always wondered how pilots found their way back over the ocean. Very clever and simple to follow. Thank you for this great video.

  • @ReptileRescue
    @ReptileRescue 24 дні тому +51

    Well, that is clever, however, being a former US Army communications specialist, I know that you wouldn't have needed to break the Navy's simple random Morse code shuffling system to determine the direction of the carrier. That's the weakness of continual transmitting on a single frequency. One need only have a direction finding receiver and a signal to tune in to... You would have needed a lot more than changing the code daily in order to keep the carriers safe. If one sweep of the transmitter took 30 seconds, and the radius were divided into 12 sectors, then a DF receiver would only have the signal for 2.5 seconds every 30 seconds. But loitering for just a couple of minutes would give you enough information to get an azimuth on the carrier. And...a smart enemy having multiple planes in the air at different points on the compass would get different azimuth bearings on the same signal, thus TRIANGULATING your carrier with great precision. So, I'm sure there was a lot more to this system than explained, and you'd probably in fact want to randomize the frequency as well, and they probably even shut it off entirely if enemy planes were expected within 200 miles radius. This isn't what I would call a secure system, though they didn't have the ability to frequency hop or digital encryption at the time.

    • @raywhitehead730
      @raywhitehead730 24 дні тому +4

      You are correct.

    • @trooperdgb9722
      @trooperdgb9722 22 дні тому +3

      Each of those aircraft would have to be fitted with RDF gear..... was that at all common in the IJN in WW2?

    • @ReptileRescue
      @ReptileRescue 21 день тому

      @@trooperdgb9722 Jesus Christ, you're dumb.

    • @ReptileRescue
      @ReptileRescue 21 день тому

      ​ @trooperdgb9722 Jesus that's dumb 🙄

    • @ReptileRescue
      @ReptileRescue 21 день тому +5

      Radio direction finders were common technology before the war even started. 🙄That's what the LOOP antennas are on aircraft of the time, which included just about EVERY amphibious recon and patrol plane and bomber.

  • @paulstuart4776
    @paulstuart4776 24 дні тому +41

    My dad flew a TBF Avenger during the war and survived three crashes. I loved hearing him talk of his experiences. I don’t recall if he told me about the navigation, so thank you for posting!

    • @x-planed
      @x-planed  24 дні тому +1

      You’re welcome. I’d love to hear Your dad’s stories too

    • @charlie1571
      @charlie1571 24 дні тому +3

      My dad was a turret gunner on a Avenger and he would not say much about his experiences in the war. You should be proud your father was a pilot. The best generation by far.

    • @paulstuart4776
      @paulstuart4776 24 дні тому +1

      @@charlie1571. Yes. They were the best!

    • @duartesimoes508
      @duartesimoes508 23 дні тому +1

      ​@@charlie1571there will be never be a better one. And the Avenger was a great aircraft, far better than the Helldiver that everyone loathed.

    • @charlie1571
      @charlie1571 23 дні тому +2

      @@duartesimoes508 How true. My father used to say that the Helldiver wasn't worth a sh** and he knew from former pilots of the aircraft. I might add that my father was assigned on escort (jeep carriers) from the Atlantic theater to the Pacific I miss him dearly.

  • @wayneantoniazzi2706
    @wayneantoniazzi2706 22 дні тому +12

    So THAT'S how they did it! I'd assumed it was some kind of aerial direction finding system but had no idea of the particulars.
    I'll tell you something I learned a long time ago, NEVER underestimate the sophistication of our forbears, I guarantee they'll surprise you every time!
    Thanks for posting!

    • @philgiglio7922
      @philgiglio7922 18 днів тому +2

      Agree, have said for yers if our ancestors had been dummies...we wouldn't be here.

    • @wayneantoniazzi2706
      @wayneantoniazzi2706 18 днів тому

      @@philgiglio7922 You said it!

  • @alaingloster4405
    @alaingloster4405 24 дні тому +79

    I preferred the British wristwatch system. They had a single narrow beam sweep at 1 rpm, pilots synchronized their watch to the beacon, so if you heard the beacon, you just looked at your watch and you knew the carrier was in the opposite direction to the seconds hand, ie if you heard the beep when the second hand pointed to 3, you knew you were East of the carrier

    • @kiwisteve6598
      @kiwisteve6598 24 дні тому +26

      That’s very elegant. Synchronising the second hand must have been a top pre flight priority.

    • @duartesimoes508
      @duartesimoes508 24 дні тому +29

      Now imagine if your watch stopped. 😰

    • @user-ik8nm2rr2e
      @user-ik8nm2rr2e 24 дні тому

      Why did the Admiralty insist on a second crewman/navigator in all their carrier aircraft designs?

    • @mothmagic1
      @mothmagic1 24 дні тому +9

      Personally i think the Anerican system is better. Battle damage may have killed your watch or even taken it off your wrist.

    • @MC-uy7el
      @MC-uy7el 24 дні тому +15

      @@mothmagic1Unfortunately the American radio receiver may get battle damaged as well🤷🏻‍♂️

  • @karhukivi
    @karhukivi 25 днів тому +29

    The forerunner to VORs which give bearings in degrees using two radio signals with a phase shift between them.

    • @pascalcoole2725
      @pascalcoole2725 24 дні тому +1

      This one basicly was verry cleverly encrypted

    • @fazole
      @fazole 20 днів тому +1

      It's a more advance version of the airmail A/N range used in the 1930s.

    • @karhukivi
      @karhukivi 20 днів тому

      @@fazole Yes, and that is still used in a very much modified way in the ILS and glideslope signals, but as two frequencies, not two Morse letters.

  • @hifinsword
    @hifinsword 25 днів тому +42

    I have wondered how they did it way back then, having used INS myself. After hours it may drift but never so much that it would leave you lost. Thanks for posting this. Today I learned something new.

    • @duartesimoes508
      @duartesimoes508 23 дні тому +4

      I once had a very interesting chat with a former TAP Air Portugal Navigator, which actually took place in the very nose of a Boeing 707, in the Air Force Museum. (It was the former President Mobutu aircraft; its nose and cockpit were fully restored, the rest was scrapped as there was no room nor money for more)
      He told me that they crossed the Atlantic based on the INS and the system did deviate a bit, but that wasn't a real issue as when approaching the American East Coast they had plenty of time to pick an NDB or VOR and correct the course very much in time. 😀
      Nowadays we have the laser operated IRS, which no longer uses gyroscopes, lines up much faster and basically does not deviates, I was told. Both are fully autonomous and impossible to jam.

    • @hifinsword
      @hifinsword 23 дні тому +1

      @@duartesimoes508 I retired a couple of decades ago. I'm sure systems are MUCH better than when I flew.

  • @user-po3ev7is5w
    @user-po3ev7is5w 24 дні тому +15

    Amazingly simple and brilliant given the tech of the day.

  • @Inkling777
    @Inkling777 24 дні тому +30

    A WWII P-38 pilot stationed in Italy told me how he found his way back to his home airfield. He would transmit on a specific frequency giving the regularly change code for his field. Directional finders would locate his position and give him the heading to return to his base. Neither the location of his plane or the field was revealed in the transmission.

    • @fazole
      @fazole 20 днів тому +2

      Unless the base used a remote repeater, wouldn't transmitting to the pilot also reveal the base location to direction finding?

  • @Tempest32nd
    @Tempest32nd 25 днів тому +20

    Amazing video. Awesome information given.

    • @x-planed
      @x-planed  25 днів тому +2

      Thanks Mate. Hope U subscribed😉

  • @cramersclassics
    @cramersclassics 17 днів тому +1

    Fantastic. I have always wondered how they found their way home. As a pilot who easily get lost, I fin their skills amazing!

  • @garyowen9044
    @garyowen9044 24 дні тому +4

    This is fascinating! Thank you, I had always wondered how pilots found their way back to a moving airfield.

    • @x-planed
      @x-planed  24 дні тому +1

      Thanks Mate. Appreciate it. Hope U subscribed😉

  • @mahoneg
    @mahoneg 24 дні тому +7

    very cool - Simplicity at work.

  • @tonyshield5368
    @tonyshield5368 25 днів тому +6

    Great factual video, liked it a lot and answered the question I've had for a couple of years. Japanese and British please.

  • @josephthompson4363
    @josephthompson4363 24 дні тому +7

    Brilliant!

  • @thewatcher5271
    @thewatcher5271 24 дні тому +7

    I've Read A-lot About Naval Aviation During World War Two, But Did Not Know About This. Thank You.

    • @x-planed
      @x-planed  24 дні тому

      Thanks for Your comment🙏

  • @billotto602
    @billotto602 24 дні тому

    In all my reading about the PTO, Navy parts, I've never heard about this system. Incredible. I've always wondered how they did it. Thank-you !

  • @hankb1604
    @hankb1604 24 дні тому +19

    Simple and effective.....usually the best option.

  • @tazman572
    @tazman572 25 днів тому +10

    Very interesting. I never read that before.

    • @x-planed
      @x-planed  25 днів тому +2

      Thanks Mate. Hope U subscribed😉

  • @richardmeo2503
    @richardmeo2503 24 дні тому +5

    Did a lot of reading and research for my WW II Book; FATAL FLAWS BOOK 1 1914-1945. Never came across this info before. Thanks.

  • @tin-man5687
    @tin-man5687 11 днів тому +1

    Just learned something new and fascinating. Never thought about it prior to this vid. Absolutely simple, yet brilliant, solution. Mega-cool. 😎

  • @tootired76
    @tootired76 24 дні тому +1

    Thanks for answering a burning question I had!!

  • @FirehawkSHD
    @FirehawkSHD 24 дні тому +1

    Looking forward to this since last vids because im very curious about this topic. Hope you find another good yet obscure topics!

  • @jbrown7403
    @jbrown7403 19 днів тому

    Great story and thanks for posting! I’ve always wondered how carrier pilots found their way home! Now I know! 👍

  • @ElbertMarks
    @ElbertMarks 19 днів тому

    Excellent! Looks like the fore runner of the VOR which gives a signal every single degree.

  • @hvnterblack
    @hvnterblack 24 дні тому +12

    It was often that planes landed on any allied carrier. Today it is reason for laughter, but in 1940s finding any friend ship when you running low on fuel was important.

    • @wayneantoniazzi2706
      @wayneantoniazzi2706 22 дні тому +2

      Forgive me if I get the names wrong but during the battle of Midway, towards the end actually, when Yorktown's pilots were informed they had to land on other carriers as Yorktown was critically damaged the following exchange took place on (I think) Enterprise between the Landing Signals Officer (LSO) and one of his assistants:
      "How many have we landed?"
      "I don't know, we've already taken on more than we launched!"
      "HOLY CHRIST! Have somebody check those airplanes for meatballs!" 🤣
      The had no idea Yorktowns airplanes were advised to divert!

    • @hvnterblack
      @hvnterblack 22 дні тому +1

      @@wayneantoniazzi2706 I never heard about that. Nice :)

    • @wayneantoniazzi2706
      @wayneantoniazzi2706 22 дні тому +1

      @@hvnterblack Thanks! I read it in a book published in 1967 called "The G.I. War" by Ralph G. Martin. One of the best books on WW2 I've ever read and told from the viewpoints of the guys who fought it. Split in two parts, the war in Europe and the war in the Pacific it's an incredible read. It also carries into the immediate post-war era as well. All didn't get back to normal as quickly as you might suppose.
      If you ever see a copy for sale grab it! You won't be sorry!

    • @hvnterblack
      @hvnterblack 22 дні тому +1

      @@wayneantoniazzi2706 And you brought source, book read years ago. Ummm, mad respect.

    • @wayneantoniazzi2706
      @wayneantoniazzi2706 22 дні тому +1

      @@hvnterblack Thanks! I've got a copy and trust me, it's not going anywhere!

  • @teacherinthailan6441
    @teacherinthailan6441 20 днів тому

    Wow! I always wondered about this. thank you so much.

  • @g-pawmikey5508
    @g-pawmikey5508 23 дні тому

    Simple but BRILLIANT..

  • @MISTERLeSkid
    @MISTERLeSkid 24 дні тому +1

    Learn something new every day.

  • @flightforensics4523
    @flightforensics4523 24 дні тому

    ALWAYS WONDERED! EXCELLENT!

  • @richardoleson7934
    @richardoleson7934 21 день тому

    I have always wondered about this exact thing. Now I know and for that I thank you.

  • @bertg.6056
    @bertg.6056 15 днів тому +1

    An outstanding presentation, thanks.

  • @gregmead2967
    @gregmead2967 24 дні тому +2

    Thanks for that very clear explanation.

    • @x-planed
      @x-planed  24 дні тому +1

      You’re welcome😉

  • @mjproebstle
    @mjproebstle 24 дні тому

    Top video, did not know this. Cheers!

  • @boggy8557
    @boggy8557 7 днів тому

    Awesome video! Thank you

  • @stejer211
    @stejer211 24 дні тому +1

    Great video and not too long, subscribed and binging!

  • @timsmith2525
    @timsmith2525 24 дні тому

    Amazing!

  • @pauloakwood9208
    @pauloakwood9208 24 дні тому +2

    I learned something new. Thank you.

    • @x-planed
      @x-planed  24 дні тому

      You’re welcome. Hope U subscribed😉

  • @marcelnowakowski945
    @marcelnowakowski945 19 днів тому

    Excellent!

  • @bob456fk6
    @bob456fk6 24 дні тому +3

    I read about one case where the ship's commander had the search lights turned on to direct a flight back to the ship, despite the protocol to leave the lights off.

    • @skylaneav8r902
      @skylaneav8r902 23 дні тому

      @@duartesimoes508You are correct.
      My CFI’s father was a TBM aviator on that operation. He was one of the fortunate ones who made it back to his ship. IIRC Halsey made the call to light the carriers.
      I had asked him about navigating back to the carrier years ago as I was curious about it as well. He said they used a beacon “like an NDB” and they “had a localizer they would turn off and on for a few seconds long enough to get a fix, and hopefully keep the Japanese from homing on the signal.”
      He was up in age when I asked about it, so details may have gotten a little fuzzy by then.

    • @ellieprice3396
      @ellieprice3396 19 днів тому

      USS Hancock did that.

  • @wwill2516
    @wwill2516 14 днів тому

    Very nice, I enjoyed always wondered about that

  • @Borsia
    @Borsia 22 дні тому

    I've always wondered about this thanks😊

  • @288theabe
    @288theabe 19 днів тому

    I've always wondered about that! Very cool video!

  • @45cab
    @45cab 17 днів тому

    Awesome knowledge

  • @AnthonyBlaize-lb2ez
    @AnthonyBlaize-lb2ez 24 дні тому +3

    That was very good. Makes you think of the Navajo Indians of ww2. Out smart the enemy love it😊😊

  • @lght5548
    @lght5548 24 дні тому

    Brilliant 👍

  • @KeithCooper-Albuquerque
    @KeithCooper-Albuquerque 9 днів тому

    Very interesting video! Thanks!

  • @MrPropanePete
    @MrPropanePete 19 днів тому

    Great video.

  • @richardblair919
    @richardblair919 18 днів тому

    Really interesting, thank you.

  • @johncheresna
    @johncheresna 24 дні тому

    Thanks, I have always wanted to know that. Seriously!

  • @robertanvilrm
    @robertanvilrm 25 днів тому +1

    thanks for that

  • @herberar
    @herberar 24 дні тому +1

    Very interesting!!! Thank for sharing!!!!

  • @paulskopic5844
    @paulskopic5844 20 днів тому

    Very clever because it was so simple.

  • @charlie1571
    @charlie1571 24 дні тому +4

    My father was a turret gunner on a Grumman TBF. One night on their way back to the carrier a F6F night fighter approached them and asked for a call sign. The pilot would not answer and my dad said answer him or we will be shot down. After the 3rd request from the fighter the pilot responded and the fighter took a hard left and disappeared. My father said that was the most scared situation he was ever in.

    • @x-planed
      @x-planed  24 дні тому

      I love such stories. Your father must have been a brave man

    • @duartesimoes508
      @duartesimoes508 23 дні тому +1

      And the Bozo in the Hellcat couldn't recognise an Avenger?! Maybe he was just having fun scaring him.

    • @charlie1571
      @charlie1571 23 дні тому +1

      @@duartesimoes508 Could be but my dad said it was at a moonless night. I guess we will never know and at the time (Okinawa) everybody with the Kakamazies was on edge.

    • @duartesimoes508
      @duartesimoes508 23 дні тому

      This I agree! 😬

  • @GAFflyer
    @GAFflyer 23 дні тому

    I was always wondering how they did it. Thanks for this great explanation!

  • @lenclayton3962
    @lenclayton3962 5 днів тому

    I imagine that one of the ingredients missing from the YZ-RB system was the lack of an indication of the range of the aircraft from its carrier. Given the extreme range over which the US Navy operated, this would have been the bigger problem, and is testament to the extraordinary courage of the crews involved.
    British pilot ex- RAF

  • @gredw6733
    @gredw6733 19 днів тому

    Wow, thank you. I did not know this.

  • @ezrabrooks12
    @ezrabrooks12 3 дні тому

    Excellent Video/Info.

  • @utar88utar
    @utar88utar 9 днів тому

    didnt know that. thank you!

  • @AdamBechtol
    @AdamBechtol 4 дні тому

    Nice, thx.

  • @brucermarino
    @brucermarino 24 дні тому +2

    Thank you from a new subscriber! Two questions: 1. Did not the British have a similar system based on timed intervals and synchronization between the plane and carrier before take off? 2. How was enemy direction finding / RDF thwarted? Thanks again!

  • @robertaccorsini4663
    @robertaccorsini4663 24 дні тому +1

    Very good. I always wondered how they got back.

  • @828enigma6
    @828enigma6 17 днів тому

    Very clever.

  • @dondash8921
    @dondash8921 16 днів тому

    Good video, it was interesting.

  • @txdino6063
    @txdino6063 23 дні тому

    Never thought of it. Good to know.

  • @grindcorejoe6661
    @grindcorejoe6661 24 дні тому +1

    Very interesting!

    • @x-planed
      @x-planed  24 дні тому +1

      Thank. Appreciate it🙏

  • @c.morees9698
    @c.morees9698 24 дні тому

    Great adventures, that time!🏝

  • @omegalphadelta726
    @omegalphadelta726 25 днів тому +1

    New vid? HELL YEAH !

  • @user-wz2qe2pv6r
    @user-wz2qe2pv6r 25 днів тому +1

    Id wondered for years how they got back, and at night. Thanks for the info, really intreresting.

  • @haroldbeck4351
    @haroldbeck4351 24 дні тому +3

    I've always wondered about this, so glad to find this video. But two questions:
    - How did Japanese naval aviators find their carriers?
    - Wasn't there a risk that the Japanese could use radio direction finding equipment to get a bearing on the carrier emitting the YZ-RB signal?

    • @x-planed
      @x-planed  24 дні тому +1

      I’ll cover that in next video. Stay tuned 😉

    • @RustySax1949
      @RustySax1949 21 день тому

      @@x-planed - As the son of a USAAC veteran, and a student of WWII history, I'm curious to know where you found this information, as it's fascinating!

  • @alfrede.newman6626
    @alfrede.newman6626 20 днів тому

    That is clever 👍😎

  • @russellbertrand3242
    @russellbertrand3242 24 дні тому +4

    thanks v much - often wondered how

  • @bobcfi1306
    @bobcfi1306 24 дні тому +1

    Very interesting

    • @x-planed
      @x-planed  24 дні тому

      Thank You. Hope U subscribed😉

  • @billvan3319
    @billvan3319 25 днів тому +1

    too cool

    • @x-planed
      @x-planed  25 днів тому

      Thanks Mate. Hope U subscribed😉

  • @marinrealestatephotography
    @marinrealestatephotography 24 дні тому

    Good video! Nice and short. Glad you didn't waste ten minutes at the start talking about what they did before the system.

    • @scottcooper4391
      @scottcooper4391 22 дні тому

      They used "Dead Reckoning" - so called because if you reckoned wrong - you were dead....

  • @RM-xl1ed
    @RM-xl1ed 17 днів тому

    That's actually really smart.

  • @landinggear5726
    @landinggear5726 24 дні тому +1

    The planes often flew beyond radio signal range on their missions, so pilots had to be really good at dead reckoning as well.

  • @edenstyle7
    @edenstyle7 23 дні тому +1

    Great video. I often wondered how they did this.

    • @x-planed
      @x-planed  23 дні тому

      Thanks. Hope U subscribed😉

  • @jtuttle11
    @jtuttle11 24 дні тому

    That, to an old 'Carrier Sailor' was Very interesting.

  • @kiyoshiotda442
    @kiyoshiotda442 19 днів тому

    Thank you. This was very information. I think the animation with the aircraft on the 30 degree slices of the compass was a bid misleading because the nose of the aircraft is pointed to the ship when it purportedly receives the signal. In fact, when the aircraft received the signal, the aircraft was likely pointed in some random direction; after receiving the signal, the pilot would then know which direction to point the aircraft in.

  • @raywhitehead730
    @raywhitehead730 24 дні тому +3

    I have, as Navy pilot, navigated, at sea, without the aid of any radar, either by the ship, land or onboard electrical aid of any kind. I used an all aluminum (no battery) air navigation computer called the Mb- 2 and the Mb-4. Yes , I am old.

    • @x-planed
      @x-planed  24 дні тому

      What is Mb-2 and Mb-4? I’m a commercial pilot myself and never heard of it. Could U elaborate pls?

    • @raywhitehead730
      @raywhitehead730 24 дні тому +1

      Go to Google type in "MB-4 Dead Reckoning Air Navigation Computer" tens of thousands, maybe more, were made. Some before America went to war. And production continued till at least the 1980's. Several versions were made. I retired a long time ago. Fun fact. I am the first person to have navigated on a combat mission using the GPS system, long before it interred military service and that was before it was approved for Civilian use. Only two satellites were up. And then there was Navstar, that's another story.

    • @raywhitehead730
      @raywhitehead730 24 дні тому +1

      Also, look up Rodger L. Easton and the NS1 and NS2 satellites . The NS2 was the first satlite to carry a true GPS, that would have been in about 1977.

    • @raywhitehead730
      @raywhitehead730 24 дні тому

      Go to Google. Type in MB-4 Dead Reckoning Air Navigation Computer. Thousands were made. I believe the first one used was in 1938. But they were used by the US military through the war and even until the 80's. Several versions were made. At one time they were common in Civilian use. Fun fact: I am the first Aviator to use the GPS system to navigate on a combat mission. That was Before it entered (approved) military service. And years before it was first used for civilian use. Only two GPS satellites were up.

    • @scottcooper4391
      @scottcooper4391 22 дні тому

      @@raywhitehead730 - Oh - was that what we called "SatNav" ?

  • @randyc5650
    @randyc5650 24 дні тому +4

    Couldn't the Japanese have triangulated the carrier location with two separated ships?

    • @holgernarrog962
      @holgernarrog962 23 дні тому +2

      Yes of course...I would guess that they sent the signal in critical situations (bad weather, carrier group changed course) only.

  • @jeffshriber6120
    @jeffshriber6120 24 дні тому +1

    I never knew that and always wondered.

  • @ric247
    @ric247 9 днів тому

    Very interesting description of the radio guidance system of the time. I just noticed a small error in your diagram of the sectorisation of the degrees on the rosette. It should read "240°" and not 230°. This system was replaced by the DME (or radio compass).

  • @markrowland1366
    @markrowland1366 7 днів тому

    The British had a system that could find the direction of enemy transmissions in several seconds. Less than it takes to establish contact with U boat command. It was called Huf Duf.

  • @fsoiberg
    @fsoiberg 24 дні тому

    I always wondered how they did that.. Thanks

  • @JZsBFF
    @JZsBFF 24 дні тому

    Thanks for sharing. That was very interesting.
    It also raises the question: how did they get home BEFORE the advent of the YZ_RB?

  • @mikelindsay6980
    @mikelindsay6980 8 днів тому

    The system you desccribe looks very like a more general nav aid of the late 1950s, called the Voice Rotating Beacon, (VRB) which eventually gave way to the familiar Visual Omni range, which in turn seems to be being replaced b GPS.

  • @parrotraiser6541
    @parrotraiser6541 22 дні тому

    I'd never considered the issue before, but this was a nice clear explanation of it and the solution.
    BTW, it would be called "Hay rake", not "hirack".

    • @ellieprice3396
      @ellieprice3396 19 днів тому

      (:-))) "Hirack" is the way the English would pronounce "Hay Rack"

  • @gordonturner3554
    @gordonturner3554 18 днів тому

    Sounds like the fore runner of ADF that I used for IFR training. Yes I’m old.

  • @tracklizard4018
    @tracklizard4018 24 дні тому +2

    X-planed with another goated video I'm sure.

    • @x-planed
      @x-planed  24 дні тому +1

      Wow thank You Mate. Appreciate it🙏

  • @lelandrogers1078
    @lelandrogers1078 8 днів тому

    I have often wondered how they did it. Thanks for the video. Makes me wonder, however, how the Japanese pilots did it.

  • @pascalcoole2725
    @pascalcoole2725 24 дні тому

    Where can I find more technical info Like used frequency, equipment, antenna's ect ?

  • @EdSmith724
    @EdSmith724 22 дні тому

    Awesome video! I’d always wondered this. BTW how did the Japanese planes navigate back?

  • @greg-warsaw4708
    @greg-warsaw4708 13 днів тому

    This is good stuff - concise and informative. One question that arises in the end is how Japanese pilots handled the same difficulty? Japanese major ace navy fighter pilot Saburo Sakai lived until 2000 and I suppose has left some memoirs or books.