In Genesis the land appeared out of the water in the third day. Water may signify death as in the flood and also if we look the type of baptism. I believe the land is a type of Christ but don't have the time to explain it. So, Genesis 1, third day: resurrection. (Water may also signify life, as God is the fountain of life).
Thanks Dr. Brown. Tovia Singer always does this. Sets up a Christian strawman and knocks it over with half truths. He knows that he isnt genuinly representing the Christian view. Before i came to faith, when i was trying to find the truth, i ruled out other religions and was down to christianity/Judaism, is it truth or false. I was reading scripture, listening to Dr. Brown and others, and Singer and others. Singer's arguements and appearance of confidence were very persuasive until i learned for myself through the scriptures and Dr. Brown. Once i learned a bit, it was obvious that he wasnt being honest. I dont mean to attack him, i still like listening to him sometimes, but i have to wonder if he has a seed of doubt. And i am so thankful for Dr. Browns teaching, knowledge, and pure search for the truth which i share. And the fact that Singer will not debate Brown is very telling. If he knows that he represents the truth, and is confident in that, why would you not debate the most successful opponent. Which is the attitude that Dr. Brown hold because he is confident that he is representing the truth.
Jesus himself said to His disciples on the road to Emmaus: “O foolish ones, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken! Was it not necessary that the Christ should suffer these things and enter into his glory?” (Luk 24:25-26) According to Jesus, the prophets had made it clear that he should suffer and be risen. This becomes clearer as we read on. “These are my words that I spoke to you while I was still with you, that everything written about me in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms must be fulfilled.” Then he opened their minds to understand the Scriptures, and said to them, “Thus it is written, that the Christ should suffer and on the third day rise from the dead, (Luk 24:44-46). Everything in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms must be fulfilled Jesus says. These are the scriptures he speaks about in the next verse. He then opens their minds to understand these very scriptures. He says "Thus scripture is written, Christ should suffer and on the third day rise from the dead." In other words, thus the Old Testament writes "Christ should suffer and on the third day rise from the dead." So Christ claims that the Old Testament reveals his suffering and glory. Christ says that the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms proclaim Christ should suffer and on the third day rise from the dead. Thus when we read the Old Testament and don't see Christ we are missing the point.
John 7:16 *Jesus answered them, and said, My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me.* _(Jesus' doctrine is God's doctrine. God's doctrine is recorded in the Old Testament.)_
This is one of the reasons it is so important for Christians to know Jesus was in the tomb three days and three nights, according to Scriptures. Jesus died on a Wednesday and resurrected Saturday afternoon right before the sisters went to the Tomb
So since the good Dr didn’t give us a passage that says, “The messiah will be raised from death on the 3rd day.” I’m asking those of you in the comment section to please post these specific scriptures. Not scripture that proves God uses 3 day periods of time to prove things. This of course should be obvious and very different from the video we all just watched. Remember, the verse says “died according to the scriptures and was raised on the 3rd day according to the scriptures.” BOTH happened according to the scriptures. Thank you in advance.
Regarding the comment that it took a long time to write the gospels down, I have read a book by a professor named David Alan black called "Why four Gospels". In this book Dr. Black tells us that the Jerusalem Church commissioned Matthew the Apostle to write the Gospel in the first 10 years of the church. This written account was then used by all of the Apostles as they took the message from Jerusalem outward into the world. So the church did have a written account of the life of Jesus in fairly quick order. What do you think of this?
BTW Hosea 6:1-2 is about Israel as a nation, but there are numerous parallels between Jesus the anointed one and Israel (prince of God), so it is Messianic in that light.
Matthew 23:8 But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren. Matthew 23:9 And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven. Matthew 23:10 Neither be ye called masters: for one is your Master, even Christ.
Also interesting is in 1 Sam 2 Where Samuel is speaking of God going into Sheol and raising people up from the dead we see that the flesh hook that the priests used to grab the meat from the sacrifice, that they would then be allowed to eat, had three hooks on it. We know that Jesus is the sacrifice and we are told that we need to eat His flesh becasue He is the resurrection and we see Jesus speaking of the time when those in Hell (Sheol) would hear His voice and be raised to two types of resurrection (John 5:29). It appears that just as the priests had three prongs on their hook to grab the meat to eat from the sacrifice, so the Jews in Hell had three days with Jesus' teaching to determine what resurrection they would have. This appears to be why Jesus was three days in Hell.
Jesus fulfilled the feast of firstfruits (Lev 23:11), something that Paul clearly states (1 Cor 15:23). But this shows that Jesus would have been raised on the 3rd day: Jesus died on Nissan 14 and that year the feast of firstfruits fell on Nissan 16, exactly when Jesus rose from the dead
@@waffles2waffles Thank you for your response. Regarding the Gospels not telling us when Jesus rose from the dead: A. Even if they didn't, the collective conscience of the faithful within the Christian congregation, the pillar and foundation of the truth (1 Tim 3:15), has always declared that Jesus rose on the 3rd day (eg see 1 Cor15:4; Nicene/Constantinople creed). B. Other parts of the New Testament say that Jesus rose on the 3rd day (eg Acts 10:40; 1 Cor 15:4). C. The Gospels do say that Jesus would be and was raised on the 3rd day. Please see Matthew 16:21; 17:23; 20:19; 27:63 Mark 8:31; 9:31; 10:34 Luke 9:22; 18:33; 24:7,46 John 2:20,21 The resurrection on the 3rd day also coheres well with the Jews and Romans sealing the tomb and setting guards on the 2nd day after Jesus' death, which presupposes that Jesus' body was still there, and the women discovering the tomb empty on the 3rd day after His death. Regarding nothing in Leviticus 23:11 to do with Jesus rising from the dead 3 days later, it depends on how one reads the passage. Paul does make the connection in 1 Cor 15:23. God's revelation, both natural and special, is rich in symbolism, something I believe is understood by both Jews and Christians. Early Christians did make this connection (eg Sacrifice of lambs, including the Passover lamb (Ex 12:46 etc) and the sacrifice of Jesus (eg John 19:36; 1:29,35). Isaiah also foresaw this (eg Isaiah 53:7,10). Regarding Jesus dying on Nissan 15 and not 14, according to the synoptic Gospels, there are different responses which resolve the apparent disagreement with John's gospel. One of them is that Israelites in the North, including Galilee, used to count day from morning to morning, whereas those in the South, including Jerusalem, from evening until the next evening. Therefore, Nissan 14 started for Jesus and His disciples while it was still Nisan 13 for those in the south, and could therefore eat the Passover that evening. The next morning, when He was crucified, it would have indeed been Nisan 15 for the Galileans but still Nisan 14 for those in the South. Therefore, Jesus did die on Nisan 14, according to the traditional Hebrew way of counting the day. I believe that Josephus and the Mishna would confirm this time difference between Northern and Southern Israel at the time of Jesus. God bless
@@waffles2waffles Thank you for your quick response! I am sorry I cannot be as fast as you. Yes, of course. Christianity is a faith. We receive by faith the apostolic teaching as passed down from generation to generation, although we cannot have direct sense experience of every single statement. But it is not a blind faith. There is plenty of evidence from nature, history, experience, the extraordinary level of holiness and supernatural feats of many individuals who abide to this teaching (e.g. check out the lives of recent saints such as St Porphyrios; St Paisios the Athonite; St Nectarios of Aegina (see the movie The Man of God, by Ylena Popovic, about the life of St Nectarios) and many others) etc. to support the truth of the Christian faith. Even if Peter and Paul were not eyewitnesses of Christ rising from the dead at the moment of His resurrection, Christ Himself told His disciples and others, on a number of occasions, before and after His death and resurrection that He would rise from the dead on the third day. The angels at the tomb also said it. Please see the verses quoted in my previous response. As you may already know, certainty is not a necessary condition for knowing something to be true. It seems to me that you question how we know that Jesus did not rise on the 2nd day. In fact, as His body must have been in the tomb on the second day when His tomb was sealed, His resurrection must have taken place sometime between Saturday morning and Sunday. Now, although there was no human eyewitness of Jesus’ resurrection at the time it happened, there is no hint in Scripture or the teaching of Church through the centuries that it happened on the second day, and all witness we receive, including Jesus’ words, is that it happened on the third day. Why the guards were set up on day 2 and not immediately? Perhaps the Sanhedrin did not think about doing this early enough and acted with some delay. But here we also see the honesty of the gospel writers, who would have every motive to write that the tomb was sealed and guarded immediately, in order to avoid the accusation that the disciples stole the body while the tomb was not guarded. Yet, they do report this detail. However, it is reasonable to assume that there was still a body in the tomb on the second day when it was sealed and guards were first set there. Regarding the way Jews counted the day in different regions at Jesus' time, have you looked into this issue? Even if this was incorrect, as I mentioned, there are a number of plausible explanations that harmonise the synoptic gospels’ and John’s gospel account of the timing of the Passover meal. For example, watch ‘Wasn’t Passover on the 15? What were they eating at the Last Supper on the 14th?’ ua-cam.com/video/6SllXtK1p-4/v-deo.html See what you think. Best wishes
Like wow…. 1. 23:11 does not speak of first fruits at all. The עמר is not a fruit, it’s a measure, as in exodus 16:18, where “they measured it by an OMER”. And ראשית קצירכם is the initial reaping of grain, namely, barley. No fruits here. 2. If he died on the 14th of Nissan, and rose on the 16th, that’s not three days and three nights, yet, this clearly contradicts Mathew 12:40, “For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of a huge fish, so the Son of Man will be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.” Yeah, it doesn’t work 😉 3. This is the most important point. Rabbi Tovia was absolutely right in criticizing Paul’s citation, while Dr Brown was either being inept or deceptive. Let’s pay close attention to what Paul actually says : “… that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that HE was buried, that HE was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures,,” He is none other the CHRIST that was just mentioned, thus we are clearly speaking of the Messiah. No, there no SCRIPTURES in which CHRIST, the Messiah, is to be buried and rise on the third day. He clearly cherry-picked the idea of a general “resurrection” being mentioned throughout the SCRIPTURES, yet, Paul speaks of the CHRIST, the Messiah, and that, one, he died for sin according to the SCRIPTURES, and, two, he was buried and rose on the third day. Thus, Paul is clearly referring to the totality of the matter, namely, CHRIST being BURIED and subsequently RISING, these three components are not separated by Paul, so what gives Brown the right to either ignorantly or deceptively insert an understanding not conveyed by Paul!? Let’s give Sr Brown the opportunity to find even one verse regarding Christ, Messiah, being buried and subsequently rising. (Hint: there are none) All he has proven is that correction and healing can and does occur on the third day. True, “…A cord of three strands is not quickly broken.” (Ecclesiastes 4:12), yet, that’s utterly irrelevant to Paul’s claim, as mentioned above. 👆 The challenge remains, and Paul’s words remain rootless.
@@tolisgalantis4896 Like wow…. 1. 23:11 does not speak of first fruits at all. The עמר is not a fruit, it’s a measure, as in exodus 16:18, where “they measured it by an OMER”. And ראשית קצירכם is the initial reaping of grain, namely, barley. No fruits here. 2. If he died on the 14th of Nissan, and rose on the 16th, that’s not three days and three nights, yet, this clearly contradicts Mathew 12:40, “For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of a huge fish, so the Son of Man will be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.” Yeah, it doesn’t work 😉 3. This is the most important point. Rabbi Tovia was absolutely right in criticizing Paul’s citation, while Dr Brown was either being inept or deceptive. Let’s pay close attention to what Paul actually says : “… that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that HE was buried, that HE was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures,,” He is none other the CHRIST that was just mentioned, thus we are clearly speaking of the Messiah. No, there no SCRIPTURES in which CHRIST, the Messiah, is to be buried and rise on the third day. He clearly cherry-picked the idea of a general “resurrection” being mentioned throughout the SCRIPTURES, yet, Paul speaks of the CHRIST, the Messiah, and that, one, he died for sin according to the SCRIPTURES, and, two, he was buried and rose on the third day. Thus, Paul is clearly referring to the totality of the matter, namely, CHRIST being BURIED and subsequently RISING, these three components are not separated by Paul, so what gives Brown the right to either ignorantly or deceptively insert an understanding not conveyed by Paul!? Let’s give Sr Brown the opportunity to find even one verse regarding Christ, Messiah, being buried and subsequently rising. (Hint: there are none) All he has proven is that correction and healing can and does occur on the third day. True, “…A cord of three strands is not quickly broken.” (Ecclesiastes 4:12), yet, that’s utterly irrelevant to Paul’s claim, as mentioned above. 👆 The challenge remains, and Paul’s words remain rootless.
Corinthians 15:3 “That Christ DIED for our sins according to the SCRIPTURE” Tovia said it was the crucifixion chapter. It’s literally right there it is BOTH the death (I believe that was crucifixion that Tovia mentioned) and then goes on to resurrection. So Tovia didn’t make an error any more than you made an error. It’s BOTH death and Resurrection.
Crucifixion...lol it's Firstfruits. in Leviticus 23:10-11, was to be done "on the day after the Sabbath." This means that it was not necessarily tied to a specific day of the week like Sunday, but rather to the Sabbath. In the Jewish calendar, the Sabbath is observed from Friday evening to Saturday evening. So, the offering of the firstfruits would take place on the day after the Sabbath, which would be a Sunday a.k.a. Lag B'Omer during the feast of unleavened bread
_Speaking of the use of double standards... Paul makes use of a double standard. And Paul is a hypocrite by the very definition of the word:_ 1 Corinthians 9:20 And unto the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain the Jews; to them that are under the law, as under the law, that I might gain them that are under the law; 1 Corinthians 9:21 To them that are without law, as without law, (being not without law to God, but under the law to Christ,) that I might gain them that are without law. _In 1 Corinthians __9:20__ He writes that became as under the law. Then in the next verse He writes that he became without law. This is purely a hypocritical teaching._ Definition of hypocrite 1: a person who puts on a false appearance of virtue or religion 2: a person who acts in contradiction to his or her stated beliefs or feelings _He claims to have “became” … “as under the law” and then “as without law” which puts on a false appearance and acts in contradiction to his stated beliefs or feelings._
@@KeepingWatch95 Please show me exactly how it was that when Paul went into a gentile community how he was a hypocrite. Did he abandon anything that was necessary in his religious beliefs as you state. If you can give me a example from Acts. He even says in the short taken out of context passages you have referenced that he was "not without law to God, but under the law to Christ". Was also Moses a hypocrite? He was Jehovah's man on earth, the man through whom Jehovah sent His law to His people but he had not circumcised his son and in Exodus 4:24 Jehovah would have killed Moses but his wife circumcised the boy. Moses knew what Jehovah had commanded Abraham but did not obey it concerning his own son. Would also consider this a example of hypocrisy?
@@tech1302 _There is much evidence against against Paul. Howbeit it seems many people make reference to the book of Acts for the justification of their believe in Paul._ _However these individuals should study Jesus' words (Jesus' sayings, teachings and instruction) closer._ _Acts records a quote from the voice of a stranger and Paul claims it is Jesus' voice._ _However Jesus taught about his sheep hearing his voice:_ John 10:27 *My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me:* John 10:4 And *when he putteth forth his own sheep, he goeth before them, and the sheep follow him: for they know his voice.* John 10:5 *And a stranger will they not follow, but will flee from him: for they know not the voice of strangers.* _Furthermore notice what Jesus says about his doctrine:_ John 7:16 *Jesus answered them, and said, My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me.* _(Jesus' doctrine is God's doctrine. God's doctrine is recorded in the Old Testament.)_ _But take notice in the “book of Acts” Paul claims that Jesus' first introduction of himself to Paul is by the use of a strange phrase not found within God's doctrine:_ Acts 26:14 *[...] Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks.* _The “book of Acts” records Paul's account that claims Jesus introduced himself to Paul by quoting a phrase which is attributed to a Greek false idol._ _(The fictional voice of a fictional Idol Dionysus who fictionally said this phrase in fictional Greek play about 406 BC.)_ *_"...it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks"_*_ is a strange saying coming from a strange Greek idol, from a strange play, which makes it the voice of a stranger._ _The “book of Acts” records Paul's testimony which is based on hearing the voice of a stranger in (Acts __26:14__)_ John 10:27 *My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me:* John 10:4 And when he putteth forth his own sheep, he goeth before them, and the sheep follow him: for they know his voice. John 10:5 And *a stranger will they not follow, but will flee from him: for they know not the voice of strangers.*
@@KeepingWatch95 So when Jesus told Paul he was persecuted him it was a strange false statement? Paul slaughtering Christians was not persecution? You say Paul was false but please prove this from scripture. Paul was approved of by the other apostles. The early church father's quoted Pauls writings as scripture.
In Genesis the land appeared out of the water in the third day. Water may signify death as in the flood and also if we look the type of baptism. I believe the land is a type of Christ but don't have the time to explain it. So, Genesis 1, third day: resurrection.
This verse is one of THE most powerful evidence for the reliability of the new testament because this verse quotes a tradition that dates back literally to the first years after the death and resurrection of Christ
Would you read the verses in hebrew? Which M.T. is authoritative? Ben Asher or Ben Naftali? Which english bible do you use? How about Septuagint? As there are many so called "jew" and "christian" in indonesia "confuse" of the M.T. and Versions. Love from indonesia.
If the writings of Paul were called Scriptures by Peter, could there be authoritative writings post crucifixion and resurrection that Paul is referring to in 1Cor 12?
1 corinthians 15 is one of the best proof of early christianity. The tradition that paul was quoting can be reasonably dated to within 2-4 years after the events of the resurrection
We know that the gospel of Mark was written very early. There’s many lines of evidence. I wouldn’t be surprised if they began writing immediately after Christs ascension.
He did come back quickly, he appeared again in physical form. Then again when he sent the Spirit back on the day of Pentecost. The Jews don't accept that either, which if they did it would open their eyes. Many Jews today are just like they were 2000 years ago. Steeped in tradition and customs and looking for a messiah that fits their flawed interpretation of what he should be.
@@a-aron6724 What a dumb ass answer. John writes in revelation that Jesus will come quickly. Paul never met the risen Jesus, but wrote he’d come quickly. You’re the ONLY person that believes in a 3rd coming of Jesus. 🤣🤣🤣
Shalom dr.Brown. I have noticed Singer's deception, not just with the NT, but also with the Tanak, things that he leave out. Like the Deceiver. Even I, with a Fishman's brain can see this; but u are right, let's give him the benefit of the doubt. He has to do, what he has to do
Ok. But where does it say that Messiah will be raised on the third day ? I repeat, we talk about Messiah, not the fact that the number three apears frequently in the hebrew bible.
He commited a taxicab fallacy, coined by Schopenhauer: "You cannot dismiss this principle enunciated in premise 1 like a hack when you have arrived at your desired destination. That would be arbitrary. You cannot say that everything has an explanation of its existence and then suddenly exempt the universe from this demand. That would be simply arbitrary." How desingenious
Pattern also includes texts, so yes. Yeshua dying for our sins and resurrecting is indicated both in Isaiah 53 (where "arm of YHWH", being a title for the angel of YHWH, indicates that the Messiah is YHWH himself) and in Daniel 9 and Daniel 7 where the Messiah dies a criminal's execution death but is ascending into heaven later (and there in Daniel 7, both the cloud riding and the fact that the "one like a son of man" shares in the uniquely divine pelach of the Ancient of Days indicates that the Messiah is YHWH himself). This dying for sins and the resurrection after three days is then also patterned. Notably, for example, Yeshua used Jonah as an example of the 3 day resurrection. I've also seen it said that "he will not see decay" was fulfilled by the 3 day resurrection since the ancient Jews believed that the body doesn't decay until after the 3rd day. (Likewise, there aren't any decayed remains present on the Shroud of Turin either.)
@@blanktrigger8863 Thanks for your answer. I believe patterns are different than explicit prophesies. If Paul is using the same terminology for both three days and suffering (back to back), shouldn't it be consistent?
@@iamnnbu I already mentioned the actual verses that support the pattern: ergo, that the messiah would not see decay gets you three days as well as Isaiah 53 and Daniel 9 and 7 gets you resurrection after an indefinite time period (that indefinite time period is made definite by "will not see decay").
@@blanktrigger8863 Thank you, but your entire approach seems very ambiguous and unconvincing. Each proof on its own accord can be dismissed quite easily. Can you textually explain your best proof? Thanks
@@iamnnbu Except haven't "quite easily" dismissed anything, so that's just a baseless claim atm. The burden of rebuttal is now on you. You have no basis union which to demand anything from me atm.
John 21 18Verily, verily, I say unto thee, When thou wast young, thou girdedst thyself, and walkedst whither thou wouldest: but when thou shalt be old, thou shalt stretch forth thy hands, and another shall gird thee, and carry thee whither thou wouldest not. 19This spake he, signifying by what death he should glorify God. And when he had spoken this, he saith unto him, Follow me.
I am sure that many of my brothers and sisters would already know this, in English we are told that Yoccanan the immerser ( John the Baptist ) saw the sign of a dove, ( Hebrew word Yonahs or Jonah, after the mikvah of Ye-hua ( baptism of Je-us ) after declaring that He was the Lamb of G-d, I that would take away the sin of the world. So vome of the people including John could understand. 🕎🌍🌏🌎✝️
@J Mireles He rejects Christianity and the New Testament and is a Jew. So there is nothing to be dishonest about. It’s like a Christian speaking on islam and the Koran, many Muslims would say the same in that case.
WE have early copies of the New Testament of the Targums and Hebrew Gospels of the Ebionites . The Gospel of Luke which it supposed to be the earliest copy of the Gospel around dated 40AD, according to Bible scholars, Luke used early copies of the the "sayings" of the Messiah called "Q source" koine Greek copies which it was compiled by Luke who put it together to correlate it as a biographical style narrative. So, it didn't take that long to write down what the Hebrew messiah did and said.
1 Corinthians 15 1-4 is the only gospel that saves you today ,the good news (gospel), Paul is our apostle, all glory to our heavenly Father and our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ
I don't think you answered the problem brother. I am seeing things like, "excellent video" in the comments section but what scriptures are Paul talking about being fulfilled from the Hebrew/Old Testament Bible is supposed to be the point of the video. The reference has to be prophesy from before Jesus in The Old Testament, not parables He Himself spoke is the issue.
I like how the Septuagint says it better “in the third day we shall rise and live before Him”. the Lord our God; For He has grasped and will heal us; He will smite and plug the wound with lint. 2After two days He will heal us. In the third day we shall rise And live before Him.
There is no such thing as yehoshua, @@falkenauge4.0ace8. You're worshipping a false deity and need to repent. Put your trust & faith in Jesus for salvation. You're not guaranteed tomorrow.
Thanks Dr. Brown But none of those that you're reading really refers to the Messiah being raised on the Third day. Nor the Messiah is supposed to die Thank you
If you'll pardon a comment years late (YT only just now showed this in my feed), the third day part isn't necessarily what Paul is saying is according to the Scriptures but the resurrection (Isaiah 53). Or he might mean sign of Jonah (which wasn't a prophecy, but that still might count as "according to" -- note that doesn't say explicitly "predicted by" -- means "accords with; fits with").
@@logicianbones hello there mate When you come across anything in the scriptures "Bible" Specially from the Greek text aka " New Testament " Which even Jesus himself quotes from "AS IT IS WRITTEN" or "ACCORDING TO THE SCRIPTURES" It means, It's SPECIFICALLY quotation from the "Hebrew text" aka Old testament Your reference with Jonah has nothing to do with that If anyone with a qoute or want's to refer to Jonah or anyone in particular they with say exactly that is about Jonah. Isaiah 53 has nothing to do with Messiah doesn't even mention anything about Messiah. Isaiah 53 is referring to the suffering SERVANT of God Read the book CONTEXT so you'll understand who the servant or servants of God that Isaiah is referring to. Hint: it has something to do with Jacob As to the phantom text that Paul and Luke are referring to the Messiah is to die and the third day to rise Pardon to say But Is none biblical none scriptural It could be referring to Simon of Perea which was famous in the time of where Jesus grew up Wherein they made up this story for their hero Sinon of Perea He died in the hands for the Romans and on the thurd day he will rise That story was decades before Jesus lived and died Not Simon the apostles Pardon the long msg Alright Peace y'all
Ha. He argues against Tovia's point of "why would they write gospels if Jesus was coming back any day" - by saying Jesus himself gave parables and told his disciple to go out to the world. Classic circular reasoning. The gospel authors are writing this later, putting these words in Jesus mouth BECAUSE he didn't come back. he was dead. It's made up. It's written years later because he wasn't coming back. Even Paul thought Jesus would return in his day. And he calls Tovia dishonest? Laughable.
50 years to release an official story is common place especially concerning strange public events; Roswell, NM event happens in 1947 and the official report is released in 1997.
Mr Brown. What are the scriptures that say CHRIST will die and be buried and then raised. Not Jonah will be released from the fish. None of these people died. It just proves that day three was important like 40 days and night, like Sabbath the seventh day. Were important. Where does it say that CHRIST will die and be buried in scripture. But thanks for the German scholars report.
Let’s pay close attention to what Paul actually says : “… that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that HE was buried, that HE was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures,,” He is none other the CHRIST that was just mentioned, thus we are clearly speaking of the Messiah. No, there no SCRIPTURES in which CHRIST, the Messiah, is to be buried and rise on the third day. You clearly cherry-picked the idea of a general “resurrection” being mentioned throughout the SCRIPTURES, yet, Paul speaks of the CHRIST, the Messiah, and that, one, he died for sins according to the SCRIPTURES, and, two, he was buried and rose on the third day. Thus, Paul is clearly referring to the totality of the matter, namely, CHRIST being BURIED and subsequently RISING, these three components are not separated by Paul, so what gives you the right to either ignorantly or deceptively insert an understanding not conveyed by Paul!? Please, Dr Brown, find even one verse regarding the Christ, Messiah, being buried and subsequently rising. All you have proven is that correction and healing can and does occur on the third day. True, “…A cord of three strands is not quickly broken.” (Ecclesiastes 4:12), yet, that’s utterly irrelevant to Paul’s claim, as mentioned above. 👆 The challenge remains, and Paul’s words remain rootless.
Was Paul talking about the Old Testament? I don't think so, he was talking about the four gospels, the New Testament. It was in written form contrary to modern scholarship that teaches they were written after Paul's writings. If the root of scholarship is incorrect then the truth would be lost until the problems are addressed.
Why are you depicting Orthodox Jews as demonic? Rabbi is just teaching how he understands the Bible, he doesn't only teach about Christian topics. You don't have to like him, but focusing on him is so silly because you aren't answering the points. You are saying Jesus was raised in 3 days, so any 3rd day reference must be a reference to him, but that isn't proving that there is a verse about the Messiah being resurrected spontaneously after 3 days. It says lots of amazing things about the Messiah but this isn't one of these
Genesis 1:11-13 (KJV 1900): 11 And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so. 12 And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good. 13 And the evening and the morning were the third day. Typology: Christ the seed of God laid in the earth for three days and on the third day arose . And began to bear fruits , and multiply, the souls of men being redeemed and came to life, and the church, and the fulfillment of all scriptures. Even 2000 years later, this seed that has sprung from the grave is still producing and the devil can’t stop it. So yes, from the very beginning we have a typology of Christ in Génesis being raised from the dead.
peoples on his channel have been believing all his lies since years. he is their god. thoses kind of people are gone be very difficult to bring to god.
There are many segments of days that are important in scripture. Just Google the "biblical significance of __ day/s" and you will get a plethora of options. These answers are not convincing at all. Christians love using ambiguous proofs from ambiguous concepts. It already started with Paul. The entire notion of Jesus is based off of ambiguous proofs.
More Mr Brown spinnery just as Paul (the spouter of lies) dealt mostly in spinnery. "Third day" was a favorite way of conveying a time passage and is frequently used in the old testament but nowhere is it applied directly as a prophecy for the messiah or "a messiah". In fact, in the way that Mr. Brown conveys this, it appears he is talking about a man god, something plucked out of pagan Rome and Greece. Mr. Brown is a Christian trying to syncretize the god of the Jews (with NO offspring - no son) with the god of the Christians (who comes in three parts - as adopted in the fourth century by Christianity - and with a son.) It would be of great benefit if Mr. Brown would accept that these are two distinctly opposite religions and let go of trying to be a Jew and a Christian at the same time. It can't be done.
So good. Thank you Dr. Brown!
@@kingdavideaglehawk9437 he usee human philosophy, nit the scriptures..
Thanks for taking me here Mike 👍🏻
In Genesis the land appeared out of the water in the third day. Water may signify death as in the flood and also if we look the type of baptism. I believe the land is a type of Christ but don't have the time to explain it. So, Genesis 1, third day: resurrection. (Water may also signify life, as God is the fountain of life).
The Wing!
Hey Mike. I like to watch your videos. I see that we both have good taste.
Thanks Dr. Brown. Tovia Singer always does this. Sets up a Christian strawman and knocks it over with half truths. He knows that he isnt genuinly representing the Christian view. Before i came to faith, when i was trying to find the truth, i ruled out other religions and was down to christianity/Judaism, is it truth or false. I was reading scripture, listening to Dr. Brown and others, and Singer and others. Singer's arguements and appearance of confidence were very persuasive until i learned for myself through the scriptures and Dr. Brown. Once i learned a bit, it was obvious that he wasnt being honest. I dont mean to attack him, i still like listening to him sometimes, but i have to wonder if he has a seed of doubt. And i am so thankful for Dr. Browns teaching, knowledge, and pure search for the truth which i share. And the fact that Singer will not debate Brown is very telling. If he knows that he represents the truth, and is confident in that, why would you not debate the most successful opponent. Which is the attitude that Dr. Brown hold because he is confident that he is representing the truth.
They had a debate u can watch it on UA-cam. They had that at least 5 years ago.
Tovias irritates me, imma just pray for the man. I’m sorry 🙏🏼
Yes, Tobias has a despicable and dishonest attitude about him. Prayer would be the only proper thing to do.
Jesus himself said to His disciples on the road to Emmaus:
“O foolish ones, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken! Was it not necessary that the Christ should suffer these things and enter into his glory?”
(Luk 24:25-26)
According to Jesus, the prophets had made it clear that he should suffer and be risen.
This becomes clearer as we read on.
“These are my words that I spoke to you while I was still with you, that everything written about me in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms must be fulfilled.” Then he opened their minds to understand the Scriptures, and said to them, “Thus it is written, that the Christ should suffer and on the third day rise from the dead, (Luk 24:44-46).
Everything in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms must be fulfilled Jesus says. These are the scriptures he speaks about in the next verse. He then opens their minds to understand these very scriptures.
He says "Thus scripture is written, Christ should suffer and on the third day rise from the dead." In other words, thus the Old Testament writes "Christ should suffer and on the third day rise from the dead."
So Christ claims that the Old Testament reveals his suffering and glory. Christ says that the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms proclaim Christ should suffer and on the third day rise from the dead. Thus when we read the Old Testament and don't see Christ we are missing the point.
John 7:16 *Jesus answered them, and said, My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me.*
_(Jesus' doctrine is God's doctrine. God's doctrine is recorded in the Old Testament.)_
Thank you very much Dr.Brown. God Bless you. This video made me very happy.
1 Corinthians 1:23 but we preach about a crucified Christ, a stumbling block to Jews and foolishness to Gentiles.
Excellent ! Thank you Michael and thank you Father God for having very knowledgeable people in your Church.
Thank you for this video and your faithful studying and ministry, Dr. Brown!
Amen
Thank you so much. I will be buying your expository literature. Glory be to God through our Lord Jesus Christ.
This is one of the reasons it is so important for Christians to know Jesus was in the tomb three days and three nights, according to Scriptures.
Jesus died on a Wednesday and resurrected Saturday afternoon right before the sisters went to the Tomb
this is the content i need, thanks mike
Fascinating stuff Dr. Brown. Never heard this information about the significance of the third day in the Old Testament. Thank you for sharing.
Wow. Singer up to his old tricks again! This guy is so lost and confused!
Great course! I watched all the videos on UA-cam & as a Jewish believer in Yeshua it so blessed me!
So since the good Dr didn’t give us a passage that says, “The messiah will be raised from death on the 3rd day.” I’m asking those of you in the comment section to please post these specific scriptures. Not scripture that proves God uses 3 day periods of time to prove things. This of course should be obvious and very different from the video we all just watched. Remember, the verse says “died according to the scriptures and was raised on the 3rd day according to the scriptures.” BOTH happened according to the scriptures.
Thank you in advance.
Regarding the comment that it took a long time to write the gospels down, I have read a book by a professor named David Alan black called "Why four Gospels". In this book Dr. Black tells us that the Jerusalem Church commissioned Matthew the Apostle to write the Gospel in the first 10 years of the church. This written account was then used by all of the Apostles as they took the message from Jerusalem outward into the world. So the church did have a written account of the life of Jesus in fairly quick order. What do you think of this?
Thanks for your info , will check this out
Thank you for this. I go back and forth between you and Singer, which is really helpful.
Does the term " MiDrash" ring a bell? Paul was not talking "Parshat". Thank you Dr. Brown you are spot on
Another excellent video, thanks Dr. Brown.
💪🏾.
Do people really think all this scripture is just coincidence?
Let’s keep rabbi’s like Tovia Singer in prayer 🙏.
BTW Hosea 6:1-2 is about Israel as a nation, but there are numerous parallels between Jesus the anointed one and Israel (prince of God), so it is Messianic in that light.
Matthew 23:8 But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren.
Matthew 23:9 And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.
Matthew 23:10 Neither be ye called masters: for one is your Master, even Christ.
Tovia Singer has resorted to even going to Christian music videos and trying to attack the Christian faith.
Thanks Dr. Brown!
It is amazing that some people hear Rabbi Zinger and actually 'leave the faith'. The guy is a pathological liar.
Also interesting is in 1 Sam 2 Where Samuel is speaking of God going into Sheol and raising people up from the dead we see that the flesh hook that the priests used to grab the meat from the sacrifice, that they would then be allowed to eat, had three hooks on it. We know that Jesus is the sacrifice and we are told that we need to eat His flesh becasue He is the resurrection and we see Jesus speaking of the time when those in Hell (Sheol) would hear His voice and be raised to two types of resurrection (John 5:29). It appears that just as the priests had three prongs on their hook to grab the meat to eat from the sacrifice, so the Jews in Hell had three days with Jesus' teaching to determine what resurrection they would have. This appears to be why Jesus was three days in Hell.
Also, the knives in the temple had one long, smooth blade, signifying Jesus would die once, smoothly, never to come back.
Been waiting for these videos!!! Thanks Dr Brown!
Jesus fulfilled the feast of firstfruits (Lev 23:11), something that Paul clearly states (1 Cor 15:23). But this shows that Jesus would have been raised on the 3rd day: Jesus died on Nissan 14 and that year the feast of firstfruits fell on Nissan 16, exactly when Jesus rose from the dead
@@waffles2waffles Thank you for your response.
Regarding the Gospels not telling us when Jesus rose from the dead:
A. Even if they didn't, the collective conscience of the faithful within the Christian congregation, the pillar and foundation of the truth (1 Tim 3:15), has always declared that Jesus rose on the 3rd day (eg see 1 Cor15:4; Nicene/Constantinople creed).
B. Other parts of the New Testament say that Jesus rose on the 3rd day (eg Acts 10:40; 1 Cor 15:4).
C. The Gospels do say that Jesus would be and was raised on the 3rd day. Please see
Matthew 16:21; 17:23; 20:19; 27:63
Mark 8:31; 9:31; 10:34
Luke 9:22; 18:33; 24:7,46
John 2:20,21
The resurrection on the 3rd day also coheres well with the Jews and Romans sealing the tomb and setting guards on the 2nd day after Jesus' death, which presupposes that Jesus' body was still there, and the women discovering the tomb empty on the 3rd day after His death.
Regarding nothing in Leviticus 23:11 to do with Jesus rising from the dead 3 days later, it depends on how one reads the passage. Paul does make the connection in 1 Cor 15:23. God's revelation, both natural and special, is rich in symbolism, something I believe is understood by both Jews and Christians. Early Christians did make this connection (eg Sacrifice of lambs, including the Passover lamb (Ex 12:46 etc) and the sacrifice of Jesus (eg John 19:36; 1:29,35). Isaiah also foresaw this (eg Isaiah 53:7,10).
Regarding Jesus dying on Nissan 15 and not 14, according to the synoptic Gospels, there are different responses which resolve the apparent disagreement with John's gospel. One of them is that Israelites in the North, including Galilee, used to count day from morning to morning, whereas those in the South, including Jerusalem, from evening until the next evening. Therefore, Nissan 14 started for Jesus and His disciples while it was still Nisan 13 for those in the south, and could therefore eat the Passover that evening. The next morning, when He was crucified, it would have indeed been Nisan 15 for the Galileans but still Nisan 14 for those in the South. Therefore, Jesus did die on Nisan 14, according to the traditional Hebrew way of counting the day. I believe that Josephus and the Mishna would confirm this time difference between Northern and Southern Israel at the time of Jesus.
God bless
@@waffles2waffles Thank you for your quick response! I am sorry I cannot be as fast as you.
Yes, of course. Christianity is a faith. We receive by faith the apostolic teaching as passed down from generation to generation, although we cannot have direct sense experience of every single statement. But it is not a blind faith. There is plenty of evidence from nature, history, experience, the extraordinary level of holiness and supernatural feats of many individuals who abide to this teaching (e.g. check out the lives of recent saints such as St Porphyrios; St Paisios the Athonite; St Nectarios of Aegina (see the movie The Man of God, by Ylena Popovic, about the life of St Nectarios) and many others) etc. to support the truth of the Christian faith.
Even if Peter and Paul were not eyewitnesses of Christ rising from the dead at the moment of His resurrection, Christ Himself told His disciples and others, on a number of occasions, before and after His death and resurrection that He would rise from the dead on the third day. The angels at the tomb also said it. Please see the verses quoted in my previous response.
As you may already know, certainty is not a necessary condition for knowing something to be true.
It seems to me that you question how we know that Jesus did not rise on the 2nd day. In fact, as His body must have been in the tomb on the second day when His tomb was sealed, His resurrection must have taken place sometime between Saturday morning and Sunday. Now, although there was no human eyewitness of Jesus’ resurrection at the time it happened, there is no hint in Scripture or the teaching of Church through the centuries that it happened on the second day, and all witness we receive, including Jesus’ words, is that it happened on the third day.
Why the guards were set up on day 2 and not immediately? Perhaps the Sanhedrin did not think about doing this early enough and acted with some delay. But here we also see the honesty of the gospel writers, who would have every motive to write that the tomb was sealed and guarded immediately, in order to avoid the accusation that the disciples stole the body while the tomb was not guarded. Yet, they do report this detail. However, it is reasonable to assume that there was still a body in the tomb on the second day when it was sealed and guards were first set there.
Regarding the way Jews counted the day in different regions at Jesus' time, have you looked into this issue? Even if this was incorrect, as I mentioned, there are a number of plausible explanations that harmonise the synoptic gospels’ and John’s gospel account of the timing of the Passover meal. For example, watch ‘Wasn’t Passover on the 15? What were they eating at the Last Supper on the 14th?’ ua-cam.com/video/6SllXtK1p-4/v-deo.html See what you think.
Best wishes
Like wow….
1. 23:11 does not speak of first fruits at all. The עמר is not a fruit, it’s a measure, as in exodus 16:18, where “they measured it by an OMER”.
And ראשית קצירכם is the initial reaping of grain, namely, barley.
No fruits here.
2. If he died on the 14th of Nissan, and rose on the 16th, that’s not three days and three nights, yet, this clearly contradicts Mathew 12:40, “For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of a huge fish, so the Son of Man will be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.”
Yeah, it doesn’t work 😉
3. This is the most important point.
Rabbi Tovia was absolutely right in criticizing Paul’s citation, while Dr Brown was either being inept or deceptive.
Let’s pay close attention to what Paul actually says :
“… that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that HE was buried, that HE was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures,,”
He is none other the CHRIST that was just mentioned, thus we are clearly speaking of the Messiah.
No, there no SCRIPTURES in which CHRIST, the Messiah, is to be buried and rise on the third day.
He clearly cherry-picked the idea of a general “resurrection” being mentioned throughout the SCRIPTURES, yet, Paul speaks of the CHRIST, the Messiah, and that, one, he died for sin according to the SCRIPTURES, and, two, he was buried and rose on the third day.
Thus, Paul is clearly referring to the totality of the matter, namely, CHRIST being BURIED and subsequently RISING, these three components are not separated by Paul, so what gives Brown the right to either ignorantly or deceptively insert an understanding not conveyed by Paul!?
Let’s give Sr Brown the opportunity to find even one verse regarding Christ, Messiah, being buried and subsequently rising. (Hint: there are none)
All he has proven is that correction and healing can and does occur on the third day. True, “…A cord of three strands is not quickly broken.” (Ecclesiastes 4:12), yet, that’s utterly irrelevant to Paul’s claim, as mentioned above. 👆
The challenge remains, and Paul’s words remain rootless.
@@tolisgalantis4896 Like wow….
1. 23:11 does not speak of first fruits at all. The עמר is not a fruit, it’s a measure, as in exodus 16:18, where “they measured it by an OMER”.
And ראשית קצירכם is the initial reaping of grain, namely, barley.
No fruits here.
2. If he died on the 14th of Nissan, and rose on the 16th, that’s not three days and three nights, yet, this clearly contradicts Mathew 12:40, “For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of a huge fish, so the Son of Man will be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.”
Yeah, it doesn’t work 😉
3. This is the most important point.
Rabbi Tovia was absolutely right in criticizing Paul’s citation, while Dr Brown was either being inept or deceptive.
Let’s pay close attention to what Paul actually says :
“… that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that HE was buried, that HE was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures,,”
He is none other the CHRIST that was just mentioned, thus we are clearly speaking of the Messiah.
No, there no SCRIPTURES in which CHRIST, the Messiah, is to be buried and rise on the third day.
He clearly cherry-picked the idea of a general “resurrection” being mentioned throughout the SCRIPTURES, yet, Paul speaks of the CHRIST, the Messiah, and that, one, he died for sin according to the SCRIPTURES, and, two, he was buried and rose on the third day.
Thus, Paul is clearly referring to the totality of the matter, namely, CHRIST being BURIED and subsequently RISING, these three components are not separated by Paul, so what gives Brown the right to either ignorantly or deceptively insert an understanding not conveyed by Paul!?
Let’s give Sr Brown the opportunity to find even one verse regarding Christ, Messiah, being buried and subsequently rising. (Hint: there are none)
All he has proven is that correction and healing can and does occur on the third day. True, “…A cord of three strands is not quickly broken.” (Ecclesiastes 4:12), yet, that’s utterly irrelevant to Paul’s claim, as mentioned above. 👆
The challenge remains, and Paul’s words remain rootless.
More videos..to refute Rabbi Tovia..I hope you also address Rabbi Scrobac.
Very insightful.
God Bless you Dr. Brown for all your insight. You have been given such a wonderful Gift of teaching Truth in Christ.
Peace
Just the sign of the prophet Jonah as stated by Yeshua on its own is a slam dunk let alone ALL the other scriptures you cite! Thank you
Thank you Dr.Brown. Keep Going 💯
Nice set and hair cut, Dr. Brown.
Appreciate!
Corinthians 15:3 “That Christ DIED for our sins according to the SCRIPTURE”
Tovia said it was the crucifixion chapter. It’s literally right there it is BOTH the death (I believe that was crucifixion that Tovia mentioned) and then goes on to resurrection.
So Tovia didn’t make an error any more than you made an error.
It’s BOTH death and Resurrection.
4:09 i feel you dr brown
Deep insight, Dr B. BH
@6:15 you said the messiah died on the third day.
We're all human, 😂
@@pdxnikki1 But we're all not teachers.
Crucifixion...lol it's
Firstfruits.
in Leviticus 23:10-11, was to be done "on the day after the Sabbath." This means that it was not necessarily tied to a specific day of the week like Sunday, but rather to the Sabbath. In the Jewish calendar, the Sabbath is observed from Friday evening to Saturday evening. So, the offering of the firstfruits would take place on the day after the Sabbath, which would be a Sunday a.k.a. Lag B'Omer during the feast of unleavened bread
Most people when they want to attack something and don't have good arguments have to be dishonest and use double standards
_Speaking of the use of double standards... Paul makes use of a double standard. And Paul is a hypocrite by the very definition of the word:_
1 Corinthians 9:20 And unto the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain the Jews; to them that are under the law, as under the law, that I might gain them that are under the law;
1 Corinthians 9:21 To them that are without law, as without law, (being not without law to God, but under the law to Christ,) that I might gain them that are without law.
_In 1 Corinthians __9:20__ He writes that became as under the law. Then in the next verse He writes that he became without law. This is purely a hypocritical teaching._
Definition of hypocrite
1: a person who puts on a false appearance of virtue or religion
2: a person who acts in contradiction to his or her stated beliefs or feelings
_He claims to have “became” … “as under the law” and then “as without law” which puts on a false appearance and acts in contradiction to his stated beliefs or feelings._
@@KeepingWatch95 Please show me exactly how it was that when Paul went into a gentile community how he was a hypocrite. Did he abandon anything that was necessary in his religious beliefs as you state. If you can give me a example from Acts. He even says in the short taken out of context passages you have referenced that he was "not without law to God, but under the law to Christ".
Was also Moses a hypocrite?
He was Jehovah's man on earth, the man through whom Jehovah sent His law to His people but he had not circumcised his son and in Exodus 4:24 Jehovah would have killed Moses but his wife circumcised the boy. Moses knew what Jehovah had commanded Abraham but did not obey it concerning his own son. Would also consider this a example of hypocrisy?
@@tech1302 _There is much evidence against against Paul. Howbeit it seems many people make reference to the book of Acts for the justification of their believe in Paul._
_However these individuals should study Jesus' words (Jesus' sayings, teachings and instruction) closer._
_Acts records a quote from the voice of a stranger and Paul claims it is Jesus' voice._
_However Jesus taught about his sheep hearing his voice:_
John 10:27 *My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me:*
John 10:4 And *when he putteth forth his own sheep, he goeth before them, and the sheep follow him: for they know his voice.* John 10:5 *And a stranger will they not follow, but will flee from him: for they know not the voice of strangers.*
_Furthermore notice what Jesus says about his doctrine:_
John 7:16 *Jesus answered them, and said, My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me.*
_(Jesus' doctrine is God's doctrine. God's doctrine is recorded in the Old Testament.)_
_But take notice in the “book of Acts” Paul claims that Jesus' first introduction of himself to Paul is by the use of a strange phrase not found within God's doctrine:_
Acts 26:14 *[...] Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks.*
_The “book of Acts” records Paul's account that claims Jesus introduced himself to Paul by quoting a phrase which is attributed to a Greek false idol._
_(The fictional voice of a fictional Idol Dionysus who fictionally said this phrase in fictional Greek play about 406 BC.)_
*_"...it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks"_*_ is a strange saying coming from a strange Greek idol, from a strange play, which makes it the voice of a stranger._
_The “book of Acts” records Paul's testimony which is based on hearing the voice of a stranger in (Acts __26:14__)_
John 10:27 *My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me:*
John 10:4 And when he putteth forth his own sheep, he goeth before them, and the sheep follow him: for they know his voice. John 10:5 And *a stranger will they not follow, but will flee from him: for they know not the voice of strangers.*
@@KeepingWatch95 So when Jesus told Paul he was persecuted him it was a strange false statement? Paul slaughtering Christians was not persecution?
You say Paul was false but please prove this from scripture.
Paul was approved of by the other apostles. The early church father's quoted Pauls writings as scripture.
@@KeepingWatch95 On a side note I am going to take a guess and say you are Unitarian. Please let me know if I am wrong.
Wow. Awesome
Will full ignorance leads to blindness and eventually you wind-up with the hardening of your heart.
(Romans 1:18;32)
In Genesis the land appeared out of the water in the third day. Water may signify death as in the flood and also if we look the type of baptism. I believe the land is a type of Christ but don't have the time to explain it. So, Genesis 1, third day: resurrection.
This verse is one of THE most powerful evidence for the reliability of the new testament because this verse quotes a tradition that dates back literally to the first years after the death and resurrection of Christ
Would you read the verses in hebrew?
Which M.T. is authoritative? Ben Asher or Ben Naftali?
Which english bible do you use?
How about Septuagint?
As there are many so called "jew" and "christian" in indonesia "confuse" of the M.T. and Versions.
Love from indonesia.
If the writings of Paul were called Scriptures by Peter, could there be authoritative writings post crucifixion and resurrection that Paul is referring to in 1Cor 12?
1 corinthians 15 is one of the best proof of early christianity. The tradition that paul was quoting can be reasonably dated to within 2-4 years after the events of the resurrection
I saw that in exodus 19 as well and noticed the pattern
We know that the gospel of Mark was written very early.
There’s many lines of evidence. I wouldn’t be surprised if they began writing immediately after Christs ascension.
100% defending our faith at it's best.
Superb analysis of an issue which I had never properly taken on board before. Thank you Dr Brown.
He has said this twice already. I have seen him make the same agurment in a debate with a christian preacher. I believe the debate was in Texas.
Your are talking nonsense, from which scripture did paul qoutes from particular?
The rabbi has not found the yeshua or the father yet lets pray for him
He could have just quoted a book we no longer have. Tanakh mentions many books which cannot be found anymore
Book of Solomon,Enoch,Yasher etc.
Paul thought he was coming back soon too. Same with John. Even quoted him saying he’s coming quickly.
He did come back quickly, he appeared again in physical form. Then again when he sent the Spirit back on the day of Pentecost. The Jews don't accept that either, which if they did it would open their eyes. Many Jews today are just like they were 2000 years ago. Steeped in tradition and customs and looking for a messiah that fits their flawed interpretation of what he should be.
@@a-aron6724 What a dumb ass answer. John writes in revelation that Jesus will come quickly. Paul never met the risen Jesus, but wrote he’d come quickly.
You’re the ONLY person that believes in a 3rd coming of Jesus. 🤣🤣🤣
Shalom dr.Brown. I have noticed Singer's deception, not just with the NT, but also with the Tanak, things that he leave out. Like the Deceiver. Even I, with a Fishman's brain can see this; but u are right, let's give him the benefit of the doubt. He has to do, what he has to do
Peter was a fisherman too.
Ok. But where does it say that Messiah will be raised on the third day ? I repeat, we talk about Messiah, not the fact that the number three apears frequently in the hebrew bible.
He commited a taxicab fallacy, coined by Schopenhauer: "You cannot dismiss this principle enunciated in premise 1 like a hack when you have arrived at your desired destination. That would be arbitrary. You cannot say that everything has an explanation of its existence and then suddenly exempt the universe from this demand. That would be simply arbitrary." How desingenious
So when Paul says "The Messiah died for our sins according to scriptures" was that referring to a pattern as well?
Pattern also includes texts, so yes. Yeshua dying for our sins and resurrecting is indicated both in Isaiah 53 (where "arm of YHWH", being a title for the angel of YHWH, indicates that the Messiah is YHWH himself) and in Daniel 9 and Daniel 7 where the Messiah dies a criminal's execution death but is ascending into heaven later (and there in Daniel 7, both the cloud riding and the fact that the "one like a son of man" shares in the uniquely divine pelach of the Ancient of Days indicates that the Messiah is YHWH himself). This dying for sins and the resurrection after three days is then also patterned.
Notably, for example, Yeshua used Jonah as an example of the 3 day resurrection. I've also seen it said that "he will not see decay" was fulfilled by the 3 day resurrection since the ancient Jews believed that the body doesn't decay until after the 3rd day. (Likewise, there aren't any decayed remains present on the Shroud of Turin either.)
@@blanktrigger8863 Thanks for your answer. I believe patterns are different than explicit prophesies. If Paul is using the same terminology for both three days and suffering (back to back), shouldn't it be consistent?
@@iamnnbu I already mentioned the actual verses that support the pattern: ergo, that the messiah would not see decay gets you three days as well as Isaiah 53 and Daniel 9 and 7 gets you resurrection after an indefinite time period (that indefinite time period is made definite by "will not see decay").
@@blanktrigger8863 Thank you, but your entire approach seems very ambiguous and unconvincing. Each proof on its own accord can be dismissed quite easily. Can you textually explain your best proof? Thanks
@@iamnnbu Except haven't "quite easily" dismissed anything, so that's just a baseless claim atm. The burden of rebuttal is now on you. You have no basis union which to demand anything from me atm.
Peter's death or John's death as an "old man"?
Would have to be John.
Peter.
John 21
18Verily, verily, I say unto thee, When thou wast young, thou girdedst thyself, and walkedst whither thou wouldest: but when thou shalt be old, thou shalt stretch forth thy hands, and another shall gird thee, and carry thee whither thou wouldest not. 19This spake he, signifying by what death he should glorify God. And when he had spoken this, he saith unto him, Follow me.
Peter...Jesus warned Peter his death by crucifixion as an old man.
@@yakovmatityahu Indeed, John 21:18-19
I am sure that many of my brothers and sisters would already know this, in English we are told that Yoccanan the immerser ( John the Baptist ) saw the sign of a dove, ( Hebrew word Yonahs or Jonah, after the mikvah of Ye-hua ( baptism of Je-us ) after declaring that He was the Lamb of G-d, I that would take away the sin of the world. So vome of the people including John could understand. 🕎🌍🌏🌎✝️
6:15 - Messiah rose on the third day**
This Rabbi Singer is clearly not being intellectually honest.
@J Mireles He rejects Christianity and the New Testament and is a Jew. So there is nothing to be dishonest about. It’s like a Christian speaking on islam and the Koran, many Muslims would say the same in that case.
Time to finish this week’s work in 3 days.
WE have early copies of the New Testament of the Targums and Hebrew Gospels of the Ebionites . The Gospel of Luke which it supposed to be the earliest copy of the Gospel around dated 40AD, according to Bible scholars, Luke used early copies of the the "sayings" of the Messiah called "Q source" koine Greek copies which it was compiled by Luke who put it together to correlate it as a biographical style narrative. So, it didn't take that long to write down what the Hebrew messiah did and said.
Tovia doesn’t mention these because it’s very misleading.
1 Corinthians 15 1-4 is the only gospel that saves you today ,the good news (gospel), Paul is our apostle, all glory to our heavenly Father and our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ
I don't think you answered the problem brother. I am seeing things like, "excellent video" in the comments section but what scriptures are Paul talking about being fulfilled from the Hebrew/Old Testament Bible is supposed to be the point of the video. The reference has to be prophesy from before Jesus in The Old Testament, not parables He Himself spoke is the issue.
I like how the Septuagint says it better “in the third day we shall rise and live before Him”.
the Lord our God; For He has grasped and will heal us; He will smite and plug the wound with lint. 2After two days He will heal us. In the third day we shall rise And live before Him.
It's ironic that at 6:15 Dr Brown makes the same slip he jumped all over the other guy for; mixing up dying and rising.
He gave him the benefit of the doubt and said it was probably just a slip up and could happen to anyone. What more should he have said?
@@garyleemusic nothing, it's still ironic
Ravi singer is mocking, not teaching
He's a deceiver
Does he not know that leading people away from the truth will take him straight to hell?
He believes he's helping others to come to the truth of Judaism.
@@IndianaJoe0321 The real Judaism is to accept his messiah yehoshua.
There is no such thing as yehoshua, @@falkenauge4.0ace8. You're worshipping a false deity and need to repent. Put your trust & faith in Jesus for salvation. You're not guaranteed tomorrow.
@@IndianaJoe0321 my salvation is in Jesus the son of god. Yeshua/ yehoshua is the Hebrew Name of Jesus.
Could not be better explained. Greetings from Germany
Thanks Dr. Brown
But none of those that you're reading really
refers to the Messiah being raised on the
Third day. Nor the Messiah is supposed to die
Thank you
If you'll pardon a comment years late (YT only just now showed this in my feed), the third day part isn't necessarily what Paul is saying is according to the Scriptures but the resurrection (Isaiah 53). Or he might mean sign of Jonah (which wasn't a prophecy, but that still might count as "according to" -- note that doesn't say explicitly "predicted by" -- means "accords with; fits with").
@@logicianbones hello there mate
When you come across anything in the scriptures
"Bible"
Specially from the Greek text aka
" New Testament "
Which even Jesus himself quotes from
"AS IT IS WRITTEN" or
"ACCORDING TO THE SCRIPTURES"
It means,
It's SPECIFICALLY
quotation from the
"Hebrew text" aka Old testament
Your reference with Jonah has nothing to do with that
If anyone with a qoute or want's to refer to Jonah or anyone in particular they with say exactly that is about Jonah.
Isaiah 53 has nothing to do with Messiah
doesn't even mention anything about Messiah.
Isaiah 53 is referring to the suffering SERVANT of God
Read the book CONTEXT so you'll understand
who the servant or servants of God
that Isaiah is referring to.
Hint: it has something to do with Jacob
As to the phantom text that Paul and Luke are
referring to the Messiah is to die and the third day to rise
Pardon to say
But Is none biblical none scriptural
It could be referring to Simon of Perea
which was famous in the time of where Jesus grew up
Wherein they made up this story for their hero
Sinon of Perea
He died in the hands for the Romans
and on the thurd day he will rise
That story was decades before Jesus lived and died
Not Simon the apostles
Pardon the long msg
Alright
Peace y'all
Ha. He argues against Tovia's point of "why would they write gospels if Jesus was coming back any day" - by saying Jesus himself gave parables and told his disciple to go out to the world. Classic circular reasoning. The gospel authors are writing this later, putting these words in Jesus mouth BECAUSE he didn't come back. he was dead. It's made up. It's written years later because he wasn't coming back. Even Paul thought Jesus would return in his day. And he calls Tovia dishonest? Laughable.
50 years to release an official story is common place especially concerning strange public events; Roswell, NM event happens in 1947 and the official report is released in 1997.
Mr Brown. What are the scriptures that say CHRIST will die and be buried and then raised.
Not Jonah will be released from the fish. None of these people died.
It just proves that day three was important like 40 days and night, like Sabbath the seventh day. Were important.
Where does it say that CHRIST will die and be buried in scripture.
But thanks for the German scholars report.
Let’s pay close attention to what Paul actually says :
“… that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that HE was buried, that HE was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures,,”
He is none other the CHRIST that was just mentioned, thus we are clearly speaking of the Messiah.
No, there no SCRIPTURES in which CHRIST, the Messiah, is to be buried and rise on the third day.
You clearly cherry-picked the idea of a general “resurrection” being mentioned throughout the SCRIPTURES, yet, Paul speaks of the CHRIST, the Messiah, and that, one, he died for sins according to the SCRIPTURES, and, two, he was buried and rose on the third day.
Thus, Paul is clearly referring to the totality of the matter, namely, CHRIST being BURIED and subsequently RISING, these three components are not separated by Paul, so what gives you the right to either ignorantly or deceptively insert an understanding not conveyed by Paul!?
Please, Dr Brown, find even one verse regarding the Christ, Messiah, being buried and subsequently rising.
All you have proven is that correction and healing can and does occur on the third day. True, “…A cord of three strands is not quickly broken.” (Ecclesiastes 4:12), yet, that’s utterly irrelevant to Paul’s claim, as mentioned above. 👆
The challenge remains, and Paul’s words remain rootless.
Was Paul talking about the Old Testament? I don't think so, he was talking about the four gospels, the New Testament. It was in written form contrary to modern scholarship that teaches they were written after Paul's writings. If the root of scholarship is incorrect then the truth would be lost until the problems are addressed.
Rise the third day. Being dead and resurrected.
Not sickness. Not multiple people.
Missed the mark completely.
I don't think He was buried. He placed in a tomb.
Singer being deceitful? How can it be?! :)
Isaac came back from the dead on third day 😂.
I feel sorry for Singer.
Why are you depicting Orthodox Jews as demonic? Rabbi is just teaching how he understands the Bible, he doesn't only teach about Christian topics. You don't have to like him, but focusing on him is so silly because you aren't answering the points. You are saying Jesus was raised in 3 days, so any 3rd day reference must be a reference to him, but that isn't proving that there is a verse about the Messiah being resurrected spontaneously after 3 days. It says lots of amazing things about the Messiah but this isn't one of these
Genesis 1:11-13 (KJV 1900): 11 And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so.
12 And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
13 And the evening and the morning were the third day.
Typology: Christ the seed of God laid in the earth for three days and on the third day arose .
And began to bear fruits , and multiply, the souls of men being redeemed and came to life, and the church, and the fulfillment of all scriptures. Even 2000 years later, this seed that has sprung from the grave is still producing and the devil can’t stop it. So yes, from the very beginning we have a typology of Christ in Génesis being raised from the dead.
the rabbi's call him (Singer) a blasphemer because he uses New Testament (Brit Chadashah).
Great response. Rabbi Singer has lost his credibility.
peoples on his channel have been believing all his lies since years. he is their god. thoses kind of people are gone be very difficult to bring to god.
Your pettiness at the beginning shows how unconvincing you know your explanations are.
Go cry somewhere ur saviour tovia got decimated
You are using theology and not facing the fact
There are many segments of days that are important in scripture. Just Google the "biblical significance of __ day/s" and you will get a plethora of options. These answers are not convincing at all. Christians love using ambiguous proofs from ambiguous concepts. It already started with Paul. The entire notion of Jesus is based off of ambiguous proofs.
Are you denying the historicity of Jesus as a real person?
@@Silence-and-Violence No, just his role as the Messiah (or even the bigger claim as him being God)
More Mr Brown spinnery just as Paul (the spouter of lies) dealt mostly in spinnery. "Third day" was a favorite way of conveying a time passage and is frequently used in the old testament but nowhere is it applied directly as a prophecy for the messiah or "a messiah". In fact, in the way that Mr. Brown conveys this, it appears he is talking about a man god, something plucked out of pagan Rome and Greece.
Mr. Brown is a Christian trying to syncretize the god of the Jews (with NO offspring - no son) with the god of the Christians (who comes in three parts - as adopted in the fourth century by Christianity - and with a son.)
It would be of great benefit if Mr. Brown would accept that these are two distinctly opposite religions and let go of trying to be a Jew and a Christian at the same time. It can't be done.
I'll be praying for you.
Thank you Dr.Brown!