Another great video, but I think that you should compare systems that bet on the exact same numbers, but use different betting methods, and of course, use the same numbers for each system. Comparing two totally different systems that bet on different numbers cannot be compared and then have one called a winner. Some of the slowest systems that take extended periods to make money, are some of the best systems out there, so 15 minutes is too short of a time period to make a logical decision on whether to play a system or not. I just want people to understand this. Thanks again for this video.
So I took this a step further on a single zero table and split the bet on the 0 with a 20-23 Split. (small loss) So the only numbers that can hurt you are 21,22 and 24. You have to be pretty unlucky to hit these numbers in succession. I also only play small, 6-4, and .50 .50 base bets. So far, making $15-$25 in about 20 minutes is pretty common. I do this 4-6 times a day and make $100. That's an extra $3000 per month, comparable to a $50,000/year taxable income. Pretty nice.
So you put 6 on 1-18 and then 4 on last dozen. You then put .50 on 0 and the .50 on 20-23 split? That would leave 19, 21, 22, 24 open I believe? Is that correct?
All roulette "systems" are just number-covering concepts. This is a 24-number game. However, you create that is open to personal taste. It will get you though eventually. Hit and run is always the way to play and level up on a loss. I prefer Baccarat over roulette, but there is quick money to be made here. @@Playstation19999
Accolades to you. Improving presentation and minimizing verbal mistakes. Good energy. Adding strategies competing against strategies is good. Proud to be a member of your club. Cheers :)
Please make some proper every day price ranges. Not many people have $2000 to waste at a casino. I'm lucky if i have $100 to spend. We need those low roller systems
No offense, but if you only have $100 to spend at a casino, you may be better off playing the slots and taking your chances there, UNLESS they have $1 minimum Roulette tables. If you want to guarantee winning at the Roulette tables, you need to come with a large bankroll.
Yeah gotta agree with these guys and truly not meaning any offense. If you only have 100 you really don’t need to be at a casino at all. Please save your money and don’t make donations to a casino
Thank you for sharing the system and repping it well. Happy with how it performed. You were up over $300 at one point. It was great seeing how many times 0/00 helped out.
That large increase and spin hoping for 4 wins in a row is very ptsd provoking. I like this system for a quick in and out. Might be prudent to take a Wilson type approach and play one time per hour or per day.😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
This is actually a good system but it would be GREAT system if you eliminate betting on the 0/00. You're sacrificing winning $10 more per spin just to bet the 0/00 and how often is that going to hit? Also, if you leave off the 0/00 bet and you get a loss you can either keep the bet the same and you would need 5 winning spins to recover OR you can triple martingale (which is what he was essentially doing in the video) and you would only need 2 spins that are wins and you'd be back in profit and even win an extra $20 from those 2 spins. Now if you get 2 losses in a row and went up to the $300/$200 betting levels then you would need 3 winning spins in a row to get back to even. Which is very doable. For the low roller people - Again, leave out betting the 0/00 and bet in increments of 3/2. For every $3 you bet on the 1-18 bet $2 on the 3rd 12. Increase to fit your buy-in. Simple as that! Hope this helps!
I agree you don’t need the zeros they are just another number/s we can’t cover them all the only difference is they are green and most people obsess over them.
High coverage systems imho are best for 4-8 tries and out. I am not a fan personally, high bets low payout, hard to recover from losses with out crazy increase.
Hi RM, I like this system, I agree with the other subscribers I don't have 2 or 3K to play with, but here's my take on it, and I may be wrong, you could play 1 dollar unit on the roulette machines, or try $5 denomination to build your bank up, just a thought, let me know what you think, you are covering over 87% of the board, and you have 6 donuts, I also think this is a great comp system as well.
TRM I would like to see a little more interaction from you and the subscribers on the reason why you won’t test these systems with the same numbers or any other issues not just “thank you for your honest feedback” to a select few comments it would be nice to know your thoughts on a lot of issues discussed here.
With so many wins it seems it would be better to increase the bets for 3 wins in a row and start over again at minimum …And just leave the bets at minimum after every loss…..
I combined this with subscriber never loses , after a loss I just go $20 on 2nd half and 2nd dozen with $4 on zeros. Made back the loss with 3 spins, and didn’t have to go up any .
Hi David I love what you do here but can you slow down at the start and show the board with the bets ,I cannot get it straight to confusing for me I guess its because Im older.but keep up the good work
Not a big fan of these full coverage systems Removing the green cover will double the profit of every spin hence shortening the time needed to reach a set profit goal. Also if you're gong to increase the bet upon losing spins to such large amounts in the hope of winning 3 in a row you might as well just triple martingale and x your fingers, once again to shorten the time spent betting these types of systems because they will bite in the long run
Fair point. Maybe instead of 3 in a row recovery, make up the loss in 2 spins. No profit included, just whatever bet was lost. But only go 3 levels deep. If you lose 1/2 recovery spins, need 2 extra to recover that bet then continue. Still prone to failure at some point, but at least not wasting much time.. just get in, get out with small profit.
@tqsuited that's a good philosophy, but as in all things, it's also a matter of personal choice... Myself, if i were to play this system ,I would sit in on the 3rd spin as the result would put me within reach of the profit goal, or close to it anyway, and quickly... This kind of coverage system, even without the green cover, will produce winning spin streaks of 3 or 6 or even 9 in a row more often than not and that alone for me justifies the gamble. If I lose it , we'll I have many more roulette strategies and a number of other table games to fall back on and recover a few hundred bucks... But like I said, that's just my personal approach Good luck to you 👌
Ben Franklin says, "A penny saved is a penny earned!". reduce that 0/00 bet to $5 and reap that bonus every 7 spins. even at $5, the 0/00 bet, if hit, yields a bonus payout.
Great advice. I would either not play the 0/00 at all, or, either play it as a separate bet, that way I always make money and recover all money lost on previous bets.
@@kentuckwhite6701 Out of curiosity the other week based on another person's comment, I played the zero $5 and was totally fascinated with the results. Took $120 and then paid $175. So was up $55. The next set of spins took $40 and paid $175 so was up a further $135. The third set of spins took $125 so again was up $50. So all up came out on top by $240. Now I understand why I like to have the zero covered in any of the bet placements I make, if possible. Because to me the zero/s come up far more frequently than people otherwise think. And if playing the system shown in this video, if in profit, I would walk once the zero hit as I would be up a fair bit of moley.
@@desleycasey7412 Exactly. I know the 0/00 at a casino did not come up for over 120 spins once, and that's two numbers. I know this because the table shows spins of the last 12 outcomes, and the zeros did not come up for several spins before that, so I started betting and my progression goes up to 98 spins, then I stopped betting on the zeros and the 00 finally came up about 7 spins later, but I was playing the zeros as a second strategy, so I made enough money on the other strategies to cover all the losses I put on the zeros.
@@desleycasey7412 first i have to say I'm SORRY to all following this thread! i tried to take a shortcut with the math and ended up dropping the ball. here is the real math.... $5 on 0/00 split = $2.50 on 0 and 2.50 on 00. either 0 win = ($2.50 x $35 =) $87.50. minus loses of $2.50 and $60 and $40 (2.50+60+40=$102.50) = a minus $15. the only way a $5 bet on 0s is a plus return would be on a single 0 table. kentuckwhite6701 has another option (separate bet) that makes more sense (& cents). i'll try not to be so lazy in the future.
@@markshepherd6962 This is a good system to play with your wife. You take 1-18 section and the 3rd 12 section. Your wife plays the 18-36 section and the 1st 12 section. You both can win or at least one of you will get a win which cancels out the others loss. The times you both win is where you will make your money, which is more than the loses.
Further to the last comment, Casinos know all. That is why you find the limit often quite high on the outside. Very few people can carry $25,000 bankrolls. And those that do, are not all that interested in making a hundred dollars or so a day.
Pitting systems againt each other is futility and counter productive. The idea is simple, learn to recognize a system that will help you to win consistently with smart play and set goals then add it to your arsenal.
Only 2 methods actually work to make money on Roulette: Method 1. Become a croupier. Method 2. Charge money teaching BS ways to beat the house. Any other "system" is going to lose in the long run. Period. Casinos were built on these BS systems. Play with what you can afford to lose, because you will, and have fun.
I’ve tried a few of your styles at the dealer-less table which is the roulette table in the middle and six seats around it, so automated and it says bet not allowed. Any systems that it will allow or any advice other than going to a real table? I like the automated table. Thanks
I play it like this i put 3 increments on 1 thr 18 and i put 2 incraments on the third 12 /Dozen this way what ever end it hits on i have it covered plus 1 incrament is always profit. This way the only #s not covered are 19 thru 24 and zeros.
3:30 that would have worked out for me because whenever i see 3 spins in a row on the same colloum or dozen i bet against it while covering 0/00/2 , there was 3 spins in a row on the bottom 1-4-7-10- etc.
All this is is $5 each on 32 numbers and hope one of the other 6 doesn't hit. Doesn't matter what numbers you choose you are betting $160 to get back $180. So if you want to play 0 00 you can since the "corners" and "3rds" don't have any significance other than making placing the bets easier.
On paper, it wouldn’t take long to run the numbers through many more systems at a time, but even then - if you run again with different numbers, the last winning strategy is not guaranteed to win again.
Hello everyone. I found a way to bet where there is a 99 % chance to never lose even in 1 million rolls and it is legal. All you need is 10k start money. In 5 minutes I made 580. At the end of 15. I had 2.5k. next to zero chance to not leave with money. It does exist and if I showed it to people. Casinos would remove roulette.
I been doing $1 unit on second and third 12s with one $1 on middle row ... So basically you get $0.00 back quiet often ( on 28 of the numbers ). But losing on 0,1,3,4,6,7,9,10,12 ( 9 ) when is hits middle row on 14,17,20,23,26,29,32,35 you double your bet. Everytime you get a loss just 2x and once you get your hit on that row go back to $1 units... Is this an illegal type of play?
I tried to do Romanowski at my local az casino on the live spin video set up and it wouldn't allow the bet... tried a couple different ways. But interesting
I played this using 6 on the dozens and 2 on the corners. Covers 32 numbers out of 38 and still lost 6 in a row from the get go. 48 dollars in the hole., trying to dig out of that with 48 2 dollar wins, gave up after a hour and a half at minus 20. No way with 80.00 bets winning 10 each time
Still 6 whacks, you can reduce it to 2!! (SINGLE 0 WHEEL) I play this but you can reduce to your bankroll: $50,- on 0 (+$50), $900,- on 1/18 (+$50,-), $600,- on 25/39 (+$50,-), $100,- on 20/21 (+$50,-) and $100,- on 22/23 (+$50,-). (+$50,- = profit).
@@Jimothy97 i call it "Hit & Run" and do 4 spins a day!! If you get whacked, it's not your day so stop playing. I have also a systeem called "Hit & Run Fast" for a total bet of $1600,- (5 whacks, 1 Hit is $200,-). $200,- a day is a nice income.
@@lonewolf7803 if you'r that unlucky........RUN!!!!! LOL, don't be greedy and grab some little cash whenever you can. I stop at $200,- a day. No need to be rich, Just a happy life
You did not do Romanovski justice. If your gonna use a recovery bet for one you should use the recovery bet for the other, had you done that, Romanovski would have dominated this competition for sure. I enjoy watching the competition videos but as others have commented, you have to compare apples to apples to make it a fare and realistic competition. You may have squeezed in an extra spin after the time was up on that second system. LOL
bankroll way to big---people hasn't got 400 dollars in savings right now---i have the money i live in vegas but lets get that bankroll down and still make good money ok
Risking $160 to only win $20 is not a good idea. Romanovsky is not a good system! Those 6 numbers that you don't have covered will bite you every time!
Are online casinos rigged? I am hearing all players are algorithmically profiled by their betting style. The algorithm is then translated to only allow for the lower amount of the player’s bets to win Stated simply, all players are algorithmically profiled by their betting style. The algorithm is then translated to only allow for the lower amount of the player’s bets to win. Just wondering is this true? Thanks for all you do.
You should test all of these "genious" systems in a real wheel with 0.10 cent bets... No hate, but real bets and tables are a complety different animal...
Yes this Roulette simulator he uses is so not in the real world. The results are not in line with actual casinos I've played many sessions on there its just not the same.
@@jerrygerard5458 i ve played many many (and lose much money) sessions on online casinos. Studying thousand of spins and realized that a certain event or sequence didnt happen in days... Started playing and boom!!! Lose all my bankroll in 20 minutes...they target us, it is impossible to win....its disgusting
What if you lose 3 in a row? So the bet 420 1 to 18, 280 on the 3rd column and 40 on the 0/00 right? And need to win 5 time to get back to base? Can you please explain more clearly and if you could ca. You write ot down on the descriptions. Thank you
I think the way it works is if you get one win after a loss you have 2 to make up so 5 in a row. If you lose 2 back to back then 6 in a row. Correct if wrong...
@@jefflippert231 I have played something similar in the past on a practice table. Not only did the same number hit twice in a row , two of the other numbers came in and I lossed 4 in a row that completely wiped out the bank roll. I will never use these systems on a live wheel.
Aren’t the odds still never really more than the… (1 in 6 for one loss) (1 in 12 for two straight losses) (1 in 18 for three straight losses) (1 in 24 for four straight losses) (1 in 30 for five straight losses) Etc…etc…????? If they are…I don’t like those odds. The house is always set up to win. There have been cases where the wheels have a slight enough flaw in the design, that favors some numbers over others, but that takes hours and hours of tracking.
Your channel would be much more effective if: 1) You kept a running double, 2) you did not go so fast in the explanation, 3) do way with the comparison and focus on one system in a single video, and 4) explain the outcome of each spin - I have to
It's not a bad system, but the issue is always those "recovery" bets. Just increase your bet by x units, win x in a row and boom recovered the loss. In this case, 3 recovery bets at +2 units. Then you lose 1 of those spins, and you need to recover the recovery bet. Then hope you don't lose ANOTHER bet while still in recovery mode. That's what inevitable will happen at some point. I don't know if you can take a reasonable stop loss either, by the time you've lost 2-3 recovery spins you're probably down a good chunk, if not most of your bankroll. But it could be fun, and fairly efficient session.. if you just want to aim for 5-10 units of profit, but risk losing your roll if "unlucky" during recovery spins.
Agree with you. However, in this type of situation, one is actually hoping the zero hits because that's where the money will be rather than in the other bet placements.
So on second system you're risking 110 to win just 10? And hope u get 11 straight wins just to cover your initial risk. That's a payout of 1:11. Even craps on the don't pass will give u a better payout of 1:2 on the 4 and 10.
The progression used on the Romanofsky system was too passive. Spent more time catching up than advancing in profit. Other progressions you’ve shown would be appropriate. Thank you for all you do.
Were’s the video were the woman got kicked out of the casino playing the third column and split betting the numbers in the third column. I can’t find it 😡😀 thanks
I would rather bet on a horse race with my preferred selection having won it's two previous races. My selection also must have the highest speed form in the line up on racing day. With this method, my winning strike rate is 82%. Casino games are for mugs. It is based on nothing more than lady luck.
@keithhogan2336 I checked out your #s on Jack Ace's roulette bet analyser. Placing $5 on zero and $30 on 1-18 and $20 on 3rd dozen. Total Bet $55. Wins: $125 on zero. And $5 on 1-18 and 3rd dozen. If you get a few wins in a row, this will add up. If you hit the zero - even better as it is the actual jackpot # so to speak. Then I suggest, one walks away (after hitting the zero and still in profit) and either have a break, go to another table or actually go home. Small wins do add up over time as the saying goes. Or at least change to another strategy for a few other spins and see how one goes.
Why do you say you need to double twice when you could just say quadruple your bet? I think its because double twice doesn't sound as scary or dangerous as quadruple your bet, but in reality they are the same thing.
Because a lot of us don't have access to a single zero wheel. If a system does well on a double zero wheel then it should only do better on a single zero wheel....
Do a live stream with one of your systems and lets see how different live play is compared to a software reality.
Another great video, but I think that you should compare systems that bet on the exact same numbers, but use different betting methods, and of course, use the same numbers for each system. Comparing two totally different systems that bet on different numbers cannot be compared and then have one called a winner. Some of the slowest systems that take extended periods to make money, are some of the best systems out there, so 15 minutes is too short of a time period to make a logical decision on whether to play a system or not. I just want people to understand this. Thanks again for this video.
Preach
So I took this a step further on a single zero table and split the bet on the 0 with a 20-23 Split. (small loss) So the only numbers that can hurt you are 21,22 and 24. You have to be pretty unlucky to hit these numbers in succession. I also only play small, 6-4, and .50 .50 base bets. So far, making $15-$25 in about 20 minutes is pretty common. I do this 4-6 times a day and make $100. That's an extra $3000 per month, comparable to a $50,000/year taxable income. Pretty nice.
So you put 6 on 1-18 and then 4 on last dozen. You then put .50 on 0 and the .50 on 20-23 split? That would leave 19, 21, 22, 24 open I believe? Is that correct?
What web site do you use for playing?
I do something similar and took 59.5 in 37 minutes
not bad w/ some tweaking for psychology
You guys still playing this ?
All roulette "systems" are just number-covering concepts. This is a 24-number game. However, you create that is open to personal taste. It will get you though eventually. Hit and run is always the way to play and level up on a loss. I prefer Baccarat over roulette, but there is quick money to be made here. @@Playstation19999
Accolades to you. Improving presentation and minimizing verbal mistakes. Good energy.
Adding strategies competing against strategies is good. Proud to be a member of your club. Cheers :)
Thank you so much that means a lot
Please make some proper every day price ranges. Not many people have $2000 to waste at a casino. I'm lucky if i have $100 to spend. We need those low roller systems
I agree but what I usually do is just take the recommended bankroll and divide it by 10 if possible but I play on line with very minimal bets.
No offense, but if you only have $100 to spend at a casino, you may be better off playing the slots and taking your chances there, UNLESS they have $1 minimum Roulette tables. If you want to guarantee winning at the Roulette tables, you need to come with a large bankroll.
Unless the table minimum is 1$, don't bother playing roulette with 100$. You don't have enough bullets to recover losses.
@@kentuckwhite6701 untrue
Yeah gotta agree with these guys and truly not meaning any offense. If you only have 100 you really don’t need to be at a casino at all. Please save your money and don’t make donations to a casino
Love this system, thanks Paul and Roulette Master!
If you were to lose three times in a row at five hundred plus dollars , you would go broke
Thank you for sharing the system and repping it well. Happy with how it performed. You were up over $300 at one point. It was great seeing how many times 0/00 helped out.
That large increase and spin hoping for 4 wins in a row is very ptsd provoking. I like this system for a quick in and out. Might be prudent to take a Wilson type approach and play one time per hour or per day.😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
What’s a Wilson type approach?
i play a variation of the 2nd system where i play 1-18 plus 2/0/00 and coulloums 19-20-21 22-23-24 with a split on the street,
This is actually a good system but it would be GREAT system if you eliminate betting on the 0/00. You're sacrificing winning $10 more per spin just to bet the 0/00 and how often is that going to hit? Also, if you leave off the 0/00 bet and you get a loss you can either keep the bet the same and you would need 5 winning spins to recover OR you can triple martingale (which is what he was essentially doing in the video) and you would only need 2 spins that are wins and you'd be back in profit and even win an extra $20 from those 2 spins. Now if you get 2 losses in a row and went up to the $300/$200 betting levels then you would need 3 winning spins in a row to get back to even. Which is very doable.
For the low roller people - Again, leave out betting the 0/00 and bet in increments of 3/2. For every $3 you bet on the 1-18 bet $2 on the 3rd 12. Increase to fit your buy-in. Simple as that! Hope this helps!
Agree but as a low bankroll player, I don't mind the grind. I like the bet on the zeros
I agree you don’t need the zeros they are just another number/s we can’t cover them all the only difference is they are green and most people obsess over them.
High coverage systems imho are best for 4-8 tries and out. I am not a fan personally, high bets low payout, hard to recover from losses with out crazy increase.
Thank you for your great feedback
Hi RM, I like this system, I agree with the other subscribers I don't have 2 or 3K to play with, but here's my take on it, and I may be wrong, you could play 1 dollar unit on the roulette machines, or try $5 denomination to build your bank up, just a thought, let me know what you think, you are covering over 87% of the board, and you have 6 donuts, I also think this is a great comp system as well.
Awesome thank you for sharing how you play
The. *CASH OUT WHEN YOU ARE AHEAD*....
covers every *system*
TRM I would like to see a little more interaction from you and the subscribers on the reason why you won’t test these systems with the same numbers or any other issues not just “thank you for your honest feedback” to a select few comments it would be nice to know your thoughts on a lot of issues discussed here.
.......HE COMPLETELY IGNORE COMMENTS asking him to kindly ''''GO LIVE'''............I dont know why.....
Hi there , thanks for this video!
Just one question in case you loose the $640 bet, what to do?
Thanks
You walk away
With so many wins it seems it would be better to increase the bets for 3 wins in a row and start over again at minimum …And just leave the bets at minimum after every loss…..
I combined this with subscriber never loses , after a loss I just go $20 on 2nd half and 2nd dozen with $4 on zeros. Made back the loss with 3 spins, and didn’t have to go up any .
I do something similar and took $59.5 in 37 minutes
not bad w/ some tweaking for psychology
👊🏾😎👍🏼
Hi David I love what you do here but can you slow down at the start and show the board with the bets ,I cannot get it straight to confusing for me I guess its because Im older.but keep up the good work
i would love to see you test them in a live online casino ;)
I prefer lower starting bet. Using the 2 up $25, $75, $125, $175, $225, $275. And two spins to recover.
Great feedback
Not a big fan of these full coverage systems
Removing the green cover will double the profit of every spin hence shortening the time needed to reach a set profit goal.
Also if you're gong to increase the bet upon losing spins to such large amounts in the hope of winning 3 in a row you might as well just triple martingale and x your fingers, once again to shorten the time spent betting these types of systems because they will bite in the long run
Exactly !!!
Fair point. Maybe instead of 3 in a row recovery, make up the loss in 2 spins. No profit included, just whatever bet was lost. But only go 3 levels deep. If you lose 1/2 recovery spins, need 2 extra to recover that bet then continue. Still prone to failure at some point, but at least not wasting much time.. just get in, get out with small profit.
@tqsuited that's a good philosophy, but as in all things, it's also a matter of personal choice...
Myself, if i were to play this system ,I would sit in on the 3rd spin as the result would put me within reach of the profit goal, or close to it anyway, and quickly...
This kind of coverage system, even without the green cover, will produce winning spin streaks of 3 or 6 or even 9 in a row more often than not and that alone for me justifies the gamble.
If I lose it , we'll I have many more roulette strategies and a number of other table games to fall back on and recover a few hundred bucks...
But like I said, that's just my personal approach
Good luck to you 👌
Ben Franklin says, "A penny saved is a penny earned!". reduce that 0/00 bet to $5 and reap that bonus every 7 spins. even at $5, the 0/00 bet, if hit, yields a bonus payout.
Great advice. I would either not play the 0/00 at all, or, either play it as a separate bet, that way I always make money and recover all money lost on previous bets.
Yes, $5 on zero would give a win: $75. However, if you have to double the bet then up the zero to $10 to get the win.
@@kentuckwhite6701 Out of curiosity the other week based on another person's comment, I played the zero $5 and was totally fascinated with the results. Took $120 and then paid $175. So was up $55. The next set of spins took $40 and paid $175 so was up a further $135. The third set of spins took $125 so again was up $50. So all up came out on top by $240.
Now I understand why I like to have the zero covered in any of the bet placements I make, if possible. Because to me the zero/s come up far more frequently than people otherwise think.
And if playing the system shown in this video, if in profit, I would walk once the zero hit as I would be up a fair bit of moley.
@@desleycasey7412 Exactly. I know the 0/00 at a casino did not come up for over 120 spins once, and that's two numbers. I know this because the table shows spins of the last 12 outcomes, and the zeros did not come up for several spins before that, so I started betting and my progression goes up to 98 spins, then I stopped betting on the zeros and the 00 finally came up about 7 spins later, but I was playing the zeros as a second strategy, so I made enough money on the other strategies to cover all the losses I put on the zeros.
@@desleycasey7412 first i have to say I'm SORRY to all following this thread! i tried to take a shortcut with the math and ended up dropping the ball. here is the real math.... $5 on 0/00 split = $2.50 on 0 and 2.50 on 00. either 0 win = ($2.50 x $35 =) $87.50. minus loses of $2.50 and $60 and $40 (2.50+60+40=$102.50) = a minus $15. the only way a $5 bet on 0s is a plus return would be on a single 0 table. kentuckwhite6701 has another option (separate bet) that makes more sense (& cents). i'll try not to be so lazy in the future.
This is a great system to play with a partner. You play the 1-18 and 3rd and your partner plays 1st twelve and 19-36. It works great.
I'm new to this, could you elaborate please?
@@markshepherd6962 This is a good system to play with your wife. You take 1-18 section and the 3rd 12 section. Your wife plays the 18-36 section and the 1st 12 section. You both can win or at least one of you will get a win which cancels out the others loss. The times you both win is where you will make your money, which is more than the loses.
@@geradcoder2918 but both will lose when a # in the 2nd dozen comes out
@@danng6819nope. Only 1 would lose
@@danng6819how? You have 12-18 and she has 19-24 covered.
Further to the last comment, Casinos know all. That is why you find the limit often quite high on the outside. Very few people can carry $25,000 bankrolls. And those that do, are not all that interested in making a hundred dollars or so a day.
Pitting systems againt each other is futility and counter productive.
The idea is simple, learn to recognize a system that will help you to win consistently with smart play and set goals then add it to your arsenal.
Thanks to everyone who contributed, and to TRM for making roulette fun. However, the great coverage systems are definitely not my favourite.
Only 2 methods actually work to make money on Roulette:
Method 1. Become a croupier.
Method 2. Charge money teaching BS ways to beat the house.
Any other "system" is going to lose in the long run. Period. Casinos were built on these BS systems. Play with what you can afford to lose, because you will, and have fun.
If the casinos had a much higher minimum bet like $50,000 the house could probably be beat with a 1 million dollar bank roll.
Looks good
Thanks!!
I’ve tried a few of your styles at the dealer-less table which is the roulette table in the middle and six seats around it, so automated and it says bet not allowed. Any systems that it will allow or any advice other than going to a real table? I like the automated table. Thanks
Great, thank you for sharing
Your not playing the minimum bet for the outside bets
This is also known as the James Bond system. Good safe system, but you have to play for a while to win decent amounts.
James Bond is 1 unit on zero 5 units on line 13/18 and 14 units on 19-36 total $20
I play it like this i put 3 increments on 1 thr 18 and i put 2 incraments on the third 12 /Dozen this way what ever end it hits on i have it covered plus 1 incrament is always profit. This way the only #s not covered are 19 thru 24 and zeros.
3:30 that would have worked out for me because whenever i see 3 spins in a row on the same colloum or dozen i bet against it while covering 0/00/2 , there was 3 spins in a row on the bottom 1-4-7-10- etc.
Thank you for sharing
All this is is $5 each on 32 numbers and hope one of the other 6 doesn't hit. Doesn't matter what numbers you choose you are betting $160 to get back $180. So if you want to play 0 00 you can since the "corners" and "3rds" don't have any significance other than making placing the bets easier.
The romanovsky as you played is quite risky. Your goal is to set profit targets and reset with very small winnings, of $2 or $1 or $5
I still say if you are going to compare systems against each other, it must be with the same numbers.
On paper, it wouldn’t take long to run the numbers through many more systems at a time, but even then - if you run again with different numbers, the last winning strategy is not guaranteed to win again.
@@WotsisFace nothing is guaranteed
Hello everyone. I found a way to bet where there is a 99 % chance to never lose even in 1 million rolls and it is legal. All you need is 10k start money. In 5 minutes I made 580. At the end of 15. I had 2.5k. next to zero chance to not leave with money. It does exist and if I showed it to people. Casinos would remove roulette.
Now what casinos can do to limit the bet is force table limits to be small. So like 500 max bet limit.
I been doing $1 unit on second and third 12s with one $1 on middle row ... So basically you get $0.00 back quiet often ( on 28 of the numbers ). But losing on 0,1,3,4,6,7,9,10,12 ( 9 ) when is hits middle row on 14,17,20,23,26,29,32,35 you double your bet. Everytime you get a loss just 2x and once you get your hit on that row go back to $1 units... Is this an illegal type of play?
I tried to do Romanowski at my local az casino on the live spin video set up and it wouldn't allow the bet... tried a couple different ways. But interesting
Start: 16:30.
I played this using 6 on the dozens and 2 on the corners. Covers 32 numbers out of 38 and still lost 6 in a row from the get go. 48 dollars in the hole., trying to dig out of that with 48 2 dollar wins, gave up after a hour and a half at minus 20. No way with 80.00 bets winning 10 each time
The nearest live roulette wheel to me is $15 min. What would be the progression bet be
Still 6 whacks, you can reduce it to 2!! (SINGLE 0 WHEEL)
I play this but you can reduce to your bankroll:
$50,- on 0 (+$50), $900,- on 1/18 (+$50,-), $600,- on 25/39 (+$50,-), $100,- on 20/21 (+$50,-) and $100,- on 22/23 (+$50,-).
(+$50,- = profit).
I set this up on the app just to check your math. You're right but wouldn't you know...19 on the second spin!! Lol, I have sh!t luck
What next after a whack?
@@Jimothy97 i call it "Hit & Run" and do 4 spins a day!! If you get whacked, it's not your day so stop playing.
I have also a systeem called "Hit & Run Fast" for a total bet of $1600,- (5 whacks, 1 Hit is $200,-). $200,- a day is a nice income.
@@lonewolf7803 if you'r that unlucky........RUN!!!!! LOL, don't be greedy and grab some little cash whenever you can.
I stop at $200,- a day. No need to be rich, Just a happy life
@@Jimothy97 Yep, I tested it too and guess what.. 24 on the 3rd spin. fml
You did not do Romanovski justice. If your gonna use a recovery bet for one you should use the recovery bet for the other, had you done that, Romanovski would have dominated this competition for sure. I enjoy watching the competition videos but as others have commented, you have to compare apples to apples to make it a fare and realistic competition.
You may have squeezed in an extra spin after the time was up on that second system. LOL
Interesting new version :)
Great work,,,any way you can figure out the chance of ruin on these systems
looks like a great system.
Thanks
bankroll way to big---people hasn't got 400 dollars in savings right now---i have the money i live in vegas but lets get that bankroll down and still make good money ok
The Matches are very good.
Yeah, betting 520 to win 70 bucks is not a good recovery imo. I would be better off putting 50 bucks on 10 streets and winning 100 betting 500.
The last system has a lot of potential guys.
Risking $160 to only win $20 is not a good idea. Romanovsky is not a good system! Those 6 numbers that you don't have covered will bite you every time!
Do you have a better idea?
Are online casinos rigged? I am hearing all players are algorithmically profiled by their betting style. The algorithm is then translated to only allow for the lower amount of the player’s bets to win Stated simply, all players are algorithmically profiled by their betting style. The algorithm is then translated to only allow for the lower amount of the player’s bets to win. Just wondering is this true? Thanks for all you do.
Yes I found this to be the case I fins a way around it by only looking for small wins early on in a system
Yes, when I mdae 27000 playing dozens, in sessions and when I cashed out some of it, I lost my bank roll twice
You should test all of these "genious" systems in a real wheel with 0.10 cent bets...
No hate, but real bets and tables are a complety different animal...
yep within two spins you hit the nos not covered
Yes this Roulette simulator he uses is so not in the real world. The results are not in line with actual casinos I've played many sessions on there its just not the same.
@@jerrygerard5458 i ve played many many (and lose much money) sessions on online casinos. Studying thousand of spins and realized that a certain event or sequence didnt happen in days...
Started playing and boom!!! Lose all my bankroll in 20 minutes...they target us, it is impossible to win....its disgusting
What is the name of that roulette app that you use on the PC? I've been trying to find that app but I cannot find it what is it called?
Roulette Roy’le
Would it be more of an advantage playing European roulette with those systems?
Thanks, Jake and yes. What is your favorite system?
What if you lose 3 in a row? So the bet 420 1 to 18, 280 on the 3rd column and 40 on the 0/00 right? And need to win 5 time to get back to base? Can you please explain more clearly and if you could ca. You write ot down on the descriptions. Thank you
I think the way it works is if you get one win after a loss you have 2 to make up so 5 in a row. If you lose 2 back to back then 6 in a row. Correct if wrong...
@@termn8er123 got it. Thank you 😊
@@jefflippert231 I have played something similar in the past on a practice table. Not only did the same number hit twice in a row , two of the other numbers came in and I lossed 4 in a row that completely wiped out the bank roll. I will never use these systems on a live wheel.
does anyone know how to submit a strategy?
Aren’t the odds still never really more than the…
(1 in 6 for one loss)
(1 in 12 for two straight losses)
(1 in 18 for three straight losses)
(1 in 24 for four straight losses)
(1 in 30 for five straight losses)
Etc…etc…?????
If they are…I don’t like those odds. The house is always set up to win.
There have been cases where the wheels have a slight enough flaw in the design, that favors some numbers over others, but that takes hours and hours of tracking.
Your channel would be much more effective if: 1) You kept a running double, 2) you did not go so fast in the explanation, 3) do way with the comparison and focus on one system in a single video, and 4) explain the outcome of each spin - I have to
Eessentially the same systems with different money methods.
Use the one on the second system on both.
It's not a bad system, but the issue is always those "recovery" bets. Just increase your bet by x units, win x in a row and boom recovered the loss. In this case, 3 recovery bets at +2 units. Then you lose 1 of those spins, and you need to recover the recovery bet. Then hope you don't lose ANOTHER bet while still in recovery mode. That's what inevitable will happen at some point. I don't know if you can take a reasonable stop loss either, by the time you've lost 2-3 recovery spins you're probably down a good chunk, if not most of your bankroll. But it could be fun, and fairly efficient session.. if you just want to aim for 5-10 units of profit, but risk losing your roll if "unlucky" during recovery spins.
Agree with you. However, in this type of situation, one is actually hoping the zero hits because that's where the money will be rather than in the other bet placements.
What online game is tht you playing
Roulette Royale simulator
Restart: At 21:00 ( on original 110 total bet).
This system is a DUD
Which one?
@@dalkhal BOTH
So on second system you're risking 110 to win just 10? And hope u get 11 straight wins just to cover your initial risk.
That's a payout of 1:11. Even craps on the don't pass will give u a better payout of 1:2 on the 4 and 10.
The best system is to watch what numbers I play and avoid them😂
what simulator do you use
Casino Royale Roulette
Roulette Roy’le
The progression used on the Romanofsky system was too passive. Spent more time catching up than advancing in profit.
Other progressions you’ve shown would be appropriate. Thank you for all you do.
Martingale seems to work great with Roman,
3 wins then reset
You need 10 wins to recover 1 . Dangerous.
Great feedback
Were’s the video were the woman got kicked out of the casino playing the third column and split betting the numbers in the third column. I can’t find it 😡😀 thanks
It’s called kicked out of the casino
Do real casino action please..that I would believe😊
betting $640 for a chance to win $80, not smart
I would rather bet on a horse race with my preferred selection having won it's two previous races. My selection also must have the highest speed form in the line up on racing day. With this method, my winning strike rate is 82%. Casino games are for mugs. It is based on nothing more than lady luck.
Tried this system yesterday. First 3 spins hit 1, 0, then 00! 😂 gotta be rigged!! 🤦♂️
I like this one n I think I'd quit after winning 300$ or more, it's too much of a yoyo effect for me lol...
What is this roulette software?
Roulette Royale
i usually incorporate 2/0/00 into my systems,
How do you do that?
on an american wheel you just place your chip on where the 2 meets the zeros @@nalamapiano
Couldn't you also do 30 on 1-18 and 20 on 3rd dozen...why risk so much to win 10 bucks
Great feedback
@keithhogan2336 I checked out your #s on Jack Ace's roulette bet analyser. Placing $5 on zero and $30 on 1-18 and $20 on 3rd dozen. Total Bet $55. Wins: $125 on zero. And $5 on 1-18 and 3rd dozen.
If you get a few wins in a row, this will add up. If you hit the zero - even better as it is the actual jackpot # so to speak.
Then I suggest, one walks away (after hitting the zero and still in profit) and either have a break, go to another table or actually go home.
Small wins do add up over time as the saying goes. Or at least change to another strategy for a few other spins and see how one goes.
Why do you say you need to double twice when you could just say quadruple your bet? I think its because double twice doesn't sound as scary or dangerous as quadruple your bet, but in reality they are the same thing.
Almost all casinos in Florida wont allow covering this many numbers
really why jew
$110 bet to win $10, that's ridiculous
Thank you for your honest feedback!
This system sucks. Down -$730 after only 20 spins on the simulator. Zero recovery capability. Far too much being wagered for so little return.
Why are you playing on a double zero table 🤦
Because a lot of us don't have access to a single zero wheel. If a system does well on a double zero wheel then it should only do better on a single zero wheel....
@@williamhoudersheldt7076 fair enough
First
way to comlicated your going way to fast for old peopile slow down can never get your original bet thanks for what you do but slow down
horrible system, too much money at risk and very difficult to recover the losses.
How to lose your money on deluded stupid systems that dont work
lump of lard, use real money if u hv the goolies!
Romanofski system sucks!
what s the name of that roulette?
Roulette Royale
TY.
280723/