It FINALLY happened! 📷 Canon third-party lenses are coming
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 вер 2024
- Sigma and Tamron have announced third-party lenses for Canon RF mount. Here is everything you need to know!
✨ The Best Entry Level Cameras: geni.us/Beginn...
🎨 The Best Lightroom Presets: bit.ly/3TDLKMx
🎧 2 Months of FREE Music: bit.ly/3GshKNA
✨ Make Money with Your Photos ➡️ bit.ly/PhotoLi...
✨ Best Entry Level Camera: geni.us/Beginn...
📷 Top Secret Presets: geni.us/DIV2
📷 MY GEAR and Lenses
My Favorite Camera: geni.us/t93yc
My Favorite Lens: geni.us/RF15-35mm
Beast Prime Lens: geni.us/RF50f1-2
Budget Prime Lens: geni.us/RF50
Best Beginner Lens: geni.us/RF3518
Best Zoom Lens: geni.us/RF70-2...
This Lens does Everything: geni.us/RF2470
My Drone: geni.us/0NF33v
Capture Smooth Footage: geni.us/DL9f8G
My favorite Vlog Microphone: geni.us/SwPS
My favorite memory cards: geni.us/b2r4ya
My Lights: geni.us/osStP
Everything Else: gugliotta.one/...
📷 My Camera Bag:
My Camera Bag: geni.us/Shimoda
Save 10% at checkout with code: "Gugliotta10"
🎵 My MUSIC and Sound Effects
Artlist 2 months FREE on an annual plan: bit.ly/3GshKNA
Musicbed (1 Month Free): geni.us/AOL10
Epidemic 30-day FREE Trial: geni.us/AGSFX
*Please note, I may earn a commission on some of the links above.
📸 INSTAGRAM: / gugliotta.one
♪ TIKTOK: / blameanthony
🌐 WEBSITE: gugliotta.one
📧 LET'S CONNECT:
gugliotta.one/...
[Timecodes]
Thoughts? Feelings on third-party lenses? What lenses do you want to see first?
Sigma 30mm F1.4
Also a buget zoom lens
about time but full frame where you at? lol
Sigma 18-35 f1.8
i sold my canon r7 last year for the same reason. 😢 i love my r7 for its small and really can do it all body. from sports to videos 🎉
Kinda sucks the lineup is all RF-S so far. The system desperately needed it, but it’s worrying that there’s a potential we’ll ONLY get rf-s lenses.
Stop being hyperbolic and be patient.
I think theyre pushing out the APSC lenses first because those are more of their budget line cameras. Where as the full frame are their "Pro" cameras and they assume that those customers can afford first party glass. (Im a sony sigma shooter btw and I'm hoping you guys get your FF 3rd party glass soon.)
Calm down, you can still use EF L lens💀FFers are so noisy at everything, just wait out, you are not the only important one here.
@@justinburley8659been literally 6 years they’ve been getting away with it stop cutting them slack
@@undifinder6643good argument but if you don’t already own them changing brand ain’t a bad choice either, truth is they don’t have 1k range lenses for all the rp/r/r8/r6 ii users
R10 plus the Tamron 17-70 2.8 would be my ultimate combo.
Yoo we same, just need wait
Why R10 and not R7? I mean sure it costs more but you did say "ultimate".
@@schm147 I purchased the R7 when if first came out and returned it after only a day or two. The R7 is an awkward size. Take the grip, for instance. They made it larger to accommodate the LP-E6 battery, but it's too thick. I shot with the 7D Mk I and 80d before going mirrorless. Both of those used the LP-E6 battery, but somehow managed to be more comfortable. Also, it's quite large for an APS-C camera, almost like a DSL-R. If I want something that big, I can use either of my previously mentioned DSLRS. In addition, I didn't like the the joystick/dial combo. It was a nice try at something different, like the touch bar on the original R, but in reality i don't think it was very functional. Finally, the kit I returned was the one with the 18-150 lens and that thing was tiny in comparison to the rest of the camera. Just an awkward set up.
The R10, on the other hand, fits my medium sized hands very well and it has a traditionally mounted joystick which to me was much easier to use. Except for the lack of weather sealing, the R10 feels more like a true successor to my 7D than the R7. My full frame cameras are the RP and R8 which are similarly sized, so the transition to the R10 would be more natural. Finally, I have three LP-17 batteries already, so they can be used in the R10.
Now that the body only price of the R10 has dropped to $1000 USD, I don't see a better APS-C value at that price point.
If they can re- release the telephoto full frame EF lenses to Rf that wound be a dream
Canon needs midrange prime telephoto lenses urgently i was seriously considering moving to nikon for their PF options. and Now Sony has a Sigma 500 f5.6 as well. This should come to Canon ASAP
Convenient that the Viltrox is being blocked.
That’s great news. Currently I’m using EF-S lenses with a R7 camera and have to use a converter. So having a variety of native lenses as an option is great news. I have a Sigma 600mm lens that doesn’t autofocus which is a pain.
Make sense to start with APSC
Most people own cheaper APSC
Canon RF glass is expensive, even the lower end. To target amateurs to give tge a better priced option also make sense.
RF APSC lacks good glass. Tamron and Sigma will pickup Canon's slack
Yeah and canon can only to so many new lenses every year , this way they can continue to push out the bread and butter rf lenses themself while they make their rfs users happy with third party makers pushing out rf-s lenses . They went from zero rf-s lenses to all the lenses I need when I buy one as a every day camera (my ff are just to big so I only use them for planned shoots )
As i shoot full frame on my "first camera" the R6, I wanted to see full frame lenses released rather than APSC lenses
I was thinking about buying an RF 50 1.2, and now I might just wait. I will definitely choose an Art over a red ring one
I went for RF 50 f/1.2 last week. Whoops.
I'd like to see the whole Sigma i-series FF prime collection getting an RF mount, at least. And, of course, the top-end Art lenses are very much welcome too. I don't care about the APS-C at all. I think that it was a mistake to bring it to RF system in the first place. The EF-M was perfectly fine for those who needed it.
I just want the 35-150mm 2-2.8 already
you unboxing random stuff in a third party lens video is kinda weird and distracting..
At the moment I am looking for 24-70 f.28 with native RF mount and I would like to see something like 150-600 or event better 200-600 with not very dark aperture but more budget friendly than canon native lenses. Currently have only 50 mm 1.8 probably will stick to it until market will saturate with 3rd party lenses.
Man...I've waited since buying an EOS R in 2021 for third-pary lenses. I saved enough money since and got the 15-35 2.8, and now Canon decides to allow third party 😂 still happy with my purchase, defintely an upgrade from the 50 1.8!
Bought an r10 literally yesterday. Awesome news!
Hi Tony, how's it going? I love your videos, thank you so much for them. They have helped me a bunch when I first began my photography journey back in Feb this year. I am still learning all the terminologies and what SS/AP/ISO to use in different settings being , for instance, landscape or street photography or portrait photos, etc. I am currently using an old Canon 550 D with my new Sigma lens 24-70mm f2.8 and I love it. However, I am thinking of upgrading and ideally would like to better features like wifi and sensors as well a better feel of the camera. Can you recommend any for me that are Canon. Initially, I would like to do some videography in the late future when I am more comfortable with photography. Please and thank you. Essentially, my budget would be within the $700 (£650) range as I live in the UK.
To stay with R5 and Canon RF and EF Canon/Sigma/Tamron lenses or move to a Sony A7 iv to start a E-mont lens collection? THAT is the question.
I am not sure Canon is going to let go of the full frame RF mount anytime soon. They supposedly announced several RF f/1.4 primes that will cost 2K or more. Quality Tamron RF options and Sigma Art RF primes, zooms and Sport lenses can't arrive fast enough.
Most of us in "the middle" don't want to sell a kidney to pay for RF lenses.
Nice Amaran unboxing! How many times did you practice the octa setup before you got a good take? I love the channel!
I'm most likely going to make the switch to Sony..can't be waiting forever for Canon to stop playing games..plus the AF on Sony is just next level anyways
Im very new to this world of video, and photography. At least when it comes to real cameras. I understand if i would buy a ef lens, abd a adopter. If the lens is 16-35mm for a full frame. It would be like a 25-55mm on my R50. Would that be the same thing with these lens?
Sigma needs to bring 35 50 85 fullframe all at 1.4f. The native 50mm 85 1.8 from Canon is absolute trash …. And canon only has f1.2 options and no 1.4
Nikon finally let Tamron in and that left Canon as the last holdout 😂
Can I use these lenses on my R8 ?
Yes but they will put the camera into crop mode
@@ronjenkins4257 ok thanks. I think I will buy the R10 or R50 as a companion to my R8.
I too have an R8 and am thinking the same.
Erm what the sigma?
Canon and Nikon banning third parting lenses has been a huge selling point for Sony.
Yeah except Nikon realized their mistake early on and now they're the 2nd mount to receive the legendary Tamron 35-150. Canon, on the other hand, expected people to simp for the R5 despite their terrible lens selection.
Thanks for being my Canon guy. Not a lot of them online. haha
Wonder why!
@@liamburke1436 just because you can’t afford Canon doesn’t mean we can’t 🤡
@@liamburke1436 Sony has more fans
@@liamburke1436because Sony is based.
only APS-C lenses are allowed. Canon lets third-party manufacturers do the work that they themselves don't want to do
So it's all just fake and no real opening for third party manufacturers
Sigma themselves have pretty much just said wait a little longer, were gonna get full frame but it will probably be after the release the apsc lenses
@@tylerharding9403 yes, Sigma ART or sports lenses are probably not allowed either. Canon must either still be very afraid of competition, or they are simply greedy for money
What, do you think they would just whip out everything single lens for you, they literally just announce the mount this early morning, let them cook the AF while pulling in more casuals who can afford budget RF-S line. Stop malding.
As an r7 user, I see the apsc lenses as an absolute win! I do sympathize with the full frame users wishing to see sigma do rf glass for full frame
I would love to have the 150-600mm or 60-600mm Sigma in a native RF mount. The EF version is probably the best sub $1000 wildlife/birding lens available.
150-600 totally win!
I have the Canon R6m2 with the Sigm a150-600 C (with adapter of course) and I like it. But would love to get a new Sigma 150-600 RF.
IT will be great if Tamron comes with 17-70mm F2.8 first. It has Image stabilization although it is not parfocal.
So disappointing for us that have the R6M2 :( we need RF Full Frame 3rd party...............
Hey Anthony
I would be happy about a 200-600mm or maybe 200-800mm which is also affordable...
A macro would also be just right for me, preferably 100-135mm.
A high quality 85mm and 50mm from the ART series would be brilliant. Maybe a 15-35mm or a decent 35mm. then I would
be perfectly happy :D The APSC lenses are rather uninteresting for me
======
Edit:
Sh!t i forgot a 24-70mm 😅then we can cancle the 15-35mm and 35mm :D
I want an RF Sigma Art 35mm prime lens!!
As a Canon R50 user I am stoked about this!
Like finally. Congrats for Canon users! The palette has opened up. from a Sony, Lumix and Fuji user.
Just picked up my R7, can’t wait! Does anyone have an official release date?
I love that this channel doesn’t seem brand biased in the sense that you would jump ship at the tiniest inconvenience like the announcement of Canon closing their mount to third party glass when they did. Most ppl can’t afford to up and switch systems. I invested in Canon and I don’t plan to switch to Sony. I was interested in checking out Fuji but with this sigma announcement I might finally buy the R50 as my B camera 😭. I was continuing to use my M50 with its great selection of lenses!! Just thanks again for being open and honest to all view points and for lack of better words, not snobbish 😅
Blud has infinite boxes 😂
I shoot with an R5, with an R as a backup. I'll be wanting to buy another main camera towards the end of the year so the R5 will become my backup. If FF lenses from third parties become available for the RF mount then I'll be looking at the R5 MkII. If those lenses aren't available then I'll seriously be considering a switch to Sony. I love Canon cameras and have been a Canon shooter for decades, but the lens situation is just really annoying.
It's about time. I would love to see a 24-105mm from Sigma or Tamron for the RF mount.
Im this close to switching to sony.
Aps-c only? ARE U FKN KIDDING ME?
Do it
@@MiguelBorgesphotography all I do is your mommy
Too late, jumped ship years ago 🤣
What do you use now, if you don't mind me asking? I'm considering jumping ship as well. Got a M6 EF-M mount a few years ago which is a great little camera, compact/ lightweight w accessible usable manual controls.
Only thing I don't like is it needs a 360° flip out screen, full 4K video, and of course Canon abandoned this system & lens mount & D/C the only compact external flash that is actually usable w the camera.
It's a shame cause it really is a great camera especially for people who have smaller hands or arthritis. I'm one of those people who likes fully functional, high end features, quality on a small, compact, lightweight package since I carry my camera in my regular day carry bag w a fast prime attached & 18-150 zoom. My focus is on handheld, low light work so fast glass & low light functionality are paramount.
I understand there may be some tradeoffs but I've been waiting for decades for the mirrorless camera to appear & come into its own with quality options offered.
Many of the Sonys & Fugi's were too large & lacked the flip out screen, so ended up going with the C M6. Thank goodness for Sigma because the options from Canon were so limited & the quality was not up to par.
Anyway, what kind of Canon did you ditch & what did you move on to?
Canon realized they don’t have the bandwidth to fill out their APSC lineup so they decided some money is better than no money and licensed the mount to third party manufacturers for APSC only.
FF won’t be coming anytime soon and all this is is canon continuing to be greedy. Plus it gets people off their backs for a little while.
Canon sucks and I’m sick of it. This is coming from a canon owner who has an r6 mark 2 and an r7
Canon already makes the best lens, and it's also the best value lens, for Canon mirrorless cameras, with the RF 200-800, for the fantastic price of only $1900. What is Sigma going to do that is any better than that ??? ....I guess I should say > for my purposes :)
Honestly, I kind of trip on all you typical wide shooting guys, that you can't find a good lens offering already ? Talk about splitting hairs. Try finding a good 1280mm combo. You have only 1 choice.
Im waiting tamron RF 35-150mm
Would love to see the whole Sigma Art Series with RF mount
Nice video! I found your analysis really interesting. Hope is a good thing but such expensive investments should never be based on hope of what might happen in the future. Canon does not mind screwing customers over while being top seller. It is simple math: 🤑
APS-C income without 3rd party lenses < with 3rd party lenses (To buy canon APS-C cameras, people need lenses and not the garbage canon sells for APS-C)
FF income without 3rd party lenses > with 3rd party lenses (This will change while loosing customers to seemingly more honest brands. Then they will reconsider...)
I shoot with my r7 witch took me along time to afford and even longer time to afford the 24-70mm 2.8l lens I have with it. With no other lenses I'm willing to buy in my budget the 24-70mm takes care of most my shooting needs. Iv been wanting a fast wider angle lens so that 11 20mm 2.8 is a God send for me. I'll be able to get a fast wide angle lense finally without having to sacrifice quailty canons budget 10 to 20mm I think it is is like 400hundref but it feels really cheap and it's variable aperture. These fast wide angle apsc lenses are amazing for me. I'm not planning on going up to full frame anytime soon the r7 is extremely capable it takes hits in autofocus with it jumping focus alot. But for the price and what you get I think it's the best bang for your buck. And lowlights capabilities are decent good enough. And for me to Juno to a camera that has the same amount of features for the price I'd need to go r5 or r6m2 and thats just to much money for me to drop right now especially since I shoot photography for fun not for money witch a large amount of ppl do
I predicted this would happen at some point in time in 2022. I was WAY off 😅
A few years late, but hey... it's finally happening! 😉
I wish Sigma would release RF lens similar to their EF 18-35 F1.8 art lens so that I can use it on my R7 without having to use an adapter like what I'm doing now with their EF-S lens
Canon, stop manipulating. Nobody believes that you will let to produce FF lenses ever by Sigma or Tamron.
My first camera was a t3i 11 years ago, and I stuck with canon through the 5div, about 6 months ago I wanted to switch to mirroless, and Canon's lens prices and lack of 3rd party options worried me, so I switched to Fujifilm. So this comes out a bit too late for me, they should have done this years ago.
a bit too late , have an r7 but was so annoyed by the lens situation(have ef lenses from my old camera with adapter ,so much choice and thought it would be the same) that i switched fully to sony emount system and my r7 is only sitting here, not much people i can sell where i live ,most are sony or nikon because of the lens choices.
300k+ subs, you must be doing something right, but to me your pacing was a bit chaotic. Made me feel anxious
oh and even worse for canon honestly , the sigma lenses send their ca data to the camera ,really? on my sony a7riii , my tamrons viltrox sigmas and whatever do that too , that shouldn't be considered a great bonus but obviously a total normal feature.
Sigma lovers are such whiners. I hear them all complaining that there are no Sigma lenses for Canon mirrorless cameras. If they want to shot Sigma lenses then buy a Sony or Nikon.
good point of competioion.
now canon chasing sony, and for that. they have to change sth.
third party lens are first
we can expect more about other if they feel desperate XD
in most of your videos you talked just about r5, r6, r7, and r50, but I never hared you talking about r8
The rumor I heard is that Canon is opening up for 3rd party lenses that don't directly compete with their own lenses. So a 24-70 f/2.8 is probably not on the table. But Canon's reluctance to invest in the R&D for those higher quality RF-s lenses checks out to let Sigma and Tamron fill that gap. Maybe we'll see Canon allow Sigma to fill the mid-range f/1.4 prime niche that is currently missing that used to be there for the EF mount. The 35mm and 50mm f/1.4 art would be a nice addition.
I’m in a predicament where I want to get rid of my r7 it’s great but I need a third party lens and canon although a good camera for beginners it is horrible in terms of $
sigma Art 50mm f1.2
Tamron sp 35mm f1.2
Sigma Art 85mm f1.2
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I dont like the colours of the lumix your skin looks kinda off and the auto focus... well...
Another reason is that many people sold their R cameras from Canon, and switched to brands who have more options in terms of glass. Looking forward to the 10-18mm and 18-50mm.
Sigma and tamron gonna have so much of my money. 😂. I always waiting for rfs lens.
i want a cheaper 700 200 f4 because it is EXPENSIVE
My Canon R100 wants a Sigma third party lens attached to it.
I cross my fingers 🫰🏼they don’t cost as RF lens! 😲🤔😉🤣
So canon want to boost sales for APS-c? It wouldn't surprise me if Canon would limit third party only to cropped cameras, since their EF-M mount failed, they are changing strategy.
It didn't fail, they abandoned it sadly. Was a great little system.
Questions about aps-c lenses. I have an R10. Will an APSc lense at 50mm give me true 50mm focal length on a crop sensor? I hope my question makes sense... still learning lol
No
2024.08.09.... stilll no zooms... canon is a dreamer...
A 15 - 24MM F2.8 IS WITH NO FOCUS BREATHUNG. FF FOR R6 AND R5
If Sigma releases the RF28-70 F1.4 or smth similar that would be crazy
lmao thats never gonna happen
Clickbait. Apsc lenses only. Anticompetitive.
We need new Zeiss lenses for the RF mount with autofocus!
Sigma rf 60-600mm would be epic
Question, not about lenses, but about circular polarizers. How often do you use them for photos? I like the feel of your shots on Instagram and in your vids. ... And I was thinking about buying a polarizer one for trips this summer. Thanks! Love your work!
Was thinking the same thing!
why are you unboxing so many boxes every video? hahaha
R50 owner here, excited for more lenses.
I think the canon rf apc-s camera are dead Canon Canon notice that …
The Sigma 14mm f1.4 for the astro shooters out there!
Sigma’s 105mm f/1.4 Art !!!!!!
Makes me consider a switch to the C70 😆
Would love to see FULL frame RF lenes by Sigma or Tamron
Give me a sigma RF 150-600mm baby
UHMM WHAT A SIGMA... UHMM WHAT SIGMA 🗣🗣
Sigma's 18-35 and 50-100 f1.8 in RF-S woild be killer. I have Canon's RF-S 10-18 f4.5-6.3, and it's fairly nice and small. But I wonder if its worth trading in for Sigma's with that constant f2.8. Plus, is Sigma gonna make an RF USB dock?
Canon R10 shooter here‼️
So when is the date
What about the R100? I have one
I currently use an R7 with a Canon 17-55 2.8 with an adapter for R mount, what are the differences between sigma 18-50 2.8 these lenses? Is it worth the change? The weight difference is very noticeable, but is the quality worth it?
Will be interested to hear your take on the S5IIX. The S5II has been my primary camera, but I also recently found a bargain on a used R5 and 100-500 lens for wildlife photography since Lumix and L-Mount still have nothing equivalent available. I find that JPEGs on the R5 are SO much better than those from the S5II (using custom Picture Styles via the Canon Picture Style Editor software vs. Lumix's Real Time LUTs). The Lumix RAW files are amazing for editing, but a lot of times for personal photography I don't want to spend all that time in post. But I digress...
The lens selection for RF mount is... Oof. Like how is there STILL no mid-range 50mm weather-sealed prime??? It's mind-boggling that you can only get a $200 50mm F1.8 that's not worth a single penny more (no IS, no weather sealing, external focusing, no lens hood, unreliable autofocus, scritchy scratchy feel, etc.), or you have to spend literally over 10 times that much money to get a giant F1.2. The used ones aren't much cheaper either and I simply refuse. I think at least having the Sigma 85mm F1.4 and 50mm F1.2 Art lenses available for RF mount would be enough for me to switch over to Canon fully, even if there are others on my wishlist.
Crop, crop sensor cameras.
I wish the 60-600
erm what the sigma
Jokes on you I already have third party RF glass, the one and only SAMYANG 85MM!!!!!
fullframe when
What about FF ?😭😭
I’m assuming there will be limitations like with Sony on things like FPS for photos and maybe there are other things also…but you get a “deal”.
I understand them coming out with the RF S first but I hope the lenses for full frame are not far behind. I have the Canon R6m2 with the Sigma 150-600 C (with adapter of course) and I like it, as I shoot wildlife mostly. But the adapter makes the buffer smaller and the iso is not as good as with a Canon RF lens, so I think my camera with a Sigma RF 150-600 will do even better. Hope they bring it out soon. But, like I said: very happy with the current combo.
I am waiting for the Sigma RF 135 Art f/1.8 and a Sigma RF 200 f/1.8 Art lens to com out.
I dont know how many people "first" camera was APSC mine was full frame the R6, so I wanted to see Full Frame Lenses Released Rather than apsc lenses