What is the S-300? A Detailed Look
Вставка
- Опубліковано 27 вер 2018
- 2 Month Free Skillshare Offer - skillshare.eqcm.net/c/1304411/...
I started a merch store. Get cool products & help support the channel!
teespring.com/stores/covertcabal
For business inquiries/sponsorships - gregr1251@gmail.com
If you'd like to help support me continue to create videos, you can do so here...
Patreon (Monthly) - / covertcabal
PayPayl (One Time Donations) - www.paypal.me/covertcabal
Discord - / discord
Amazon Prime 30 Free Trial - amzn.to/2AiNfvJ
Microphone I use = amzn.to/2zYFz1D
Video Editor = amzn.to/2JLqX5o
Military Aircraft Models = amzn.to/2A3NPxu
Military Strategy Book = amzn.to/2AaqwST
----------------------------------
Credits:
Footage:
Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation
creativecommons.org/licenses/...
The NATO Channel
Department of Defense (US)
"The appearance of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) visual information does not imply or constitute DoD endorsement."
KCNA - North Korea State Media
Music:
BTS Prolog - Kevin MacLeod - incompetech.com
Mounted Clam Shell and Flap Lid Radars
Author: ShinePahntom
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en
Mounted Clam Shell Radar
Author: ShinePahntom
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en
S-200 Missile System
Author: George Chernilevsky
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en
S-300V Image #1
Author: Vitaly V Kuzmin
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.en
S-300V Image #2
Author: Vitaly V Kuzmin
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.en
S-300V Image #3
Author: Vitaly V Kuzmin
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.en
Includes paid promotion " Buy two S300 and get a free bottle opener"
Ukraine would sign up for that.
And a triple vodka 😎😉🤭😂🤣
This what saving Ukraine
@@remix-yy1hs all S-300 deployed in Ukraine is already destroyed by Russia
@@Brewliciouscafe really. Because I saw Ukraine footage of s300 still in service on 14/12/2022
5:43 the truck looks like it's smiling lol
I think it was recently serviced :)
It is laughing.
Yes please make video about radar jammers and ECM
and some more on the s300 and s400 and there radar
@@fastmover45 is S500 a thing ?
hope this helps en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S-500_missile_system
Chris Rivas, It's in development, but yes, it's a thing.
Someone Here Russia supplied Syria with an S-300 air defence system and jamming satellite navigation, on-board radars and communication systems of combat aircraft that attack targets in Syria and in the regions over the waters of the Mediterranean Sea bordering with Syria.👏👏👏👏
This is a very good program for non technical people and is a well balanced overview; much appreciated!
Radar jammer video will be cool.
www.defensionem.com/russian-electronic-warfare-systems/
classified...
Ronald Swanson Russia supplied Syria with an S-300 air defence system and jamming satellite navigation, on-board radars and communication systems of combat aircraft that attack targets in Syria and in the regions over the waters of the Mediterranean Sea bordering with Syria.👏👏👏👏
Ronald Swanson Only haters don't admit others have better Air defense systems..😄😄😄
Ronald Swanson m.gulfnews.com/amp/news/mena/syria/israelis-find-navigation-jamming-scarier-than-s-300-missiles-1.2283138
Of course UA-cam Recommends me this
Video after the Shipment of S-300 Missile
Systems from Slovakia. 🤭
Yes, because Slovakia has seen them not working, and doesn't want them anymore....probably so they can buy Patriots like the rest of the world....hahahahahaaaa!
As a lot of people already mentioned, your videos are awesome. I would love a detailed video on how radar works, different kinds of radars and so on.
ua-cam.com/video/Hw5IaS6-Fzw/v-deo.html
@@sveggvegg6716 Thanks bro, 4 years later you've got my back :)
An extremely well done video considering how short it was. Anyone who's seen the S-300's convoluted family tree knows how hard it would be to cover all the major variants.
Your channel is amazing, all perfect,
But can you discuss one of the following topics too and make it as series or full video;
1. Distribution and usage of weapons used in Syria Civil War (rebel, syria army, isis, etc)
2. Tactics used by isis or rebel militants
3. Russia presence in Syria and its air defense system
4. Development of jamming technology
5. China or Japan navy power
6. The situation and development in South China Sea , and china military defense in that territory
japans navy probably could destroy china
ItsLegitBoi IDk for how long until those hypersonic missiles makes a graveyard on the ocean floor with all navy vessels except subs
#6 has been my Favorite topic and I'd love to see that video lol
It's a proxy war, not a "civil war"...
None because that leads to a political shitfest that we don’t need to see. IMO, it is best to stay away from that and just focus on the tech
Nice video. One thing that I would add: S-300/400/550 are integrated with other air defence systems such as buk and pantsir generating a layered defence. Overwhelming is probably the best thing to do, but the question is can the aircraft (that would be dropping those smaller missiles) get close enough without getting shot down. S-300 has a range of up to 250 kms and s-400 up to 380.
I'd say that Russian military is well aware of overwhelming strategy and most likely have a counter strategy ready.
Also, S-300 saw a very limited action in Syria and was effective there.I hope that there will not be a need to any more action.
God did not hear your words. Seems they're being put into heavy action
@@xX0rt4Xx And there still a Threat
it depends. the patriot missiles shot many allies jet down before. one of the allies shot the patriot missiles before it was able to launch its missiles at it. i guess it depend on environment. also, these system is mainly to put a no fly zone in certain area. SAM is effective if its not being target. any air defense has its weakness and can be overwhlem.
Watch a Cabal, instant sub, this is the best military channel on youtube, no misinformation, no robotic voice.
Excellent video, probably the best I've seen regarding the S300 family - accurate and efficient information here, well done.
Problem with s300 and s400 for attackers is because they are mobile and they are just a piece of large air defense group. To get to s300 and s400 you fist must pass trough many many more systems that can shoot you down. So yes, West did train against s300 from 80', but didnt train against all components in which s300 function.
@@user-js2dr9gv1u Wouldn't that spark a nuclear war and literally put us in the fallout/Metro Universe?
@@user-js2dr9gv1u
_Ignoring the fact that Russia have the largest inventory of inter-continental ballistic missiles loaded with nuclear warhead in the world_
Mike is yet another product of our country's ridiculous ego. No actual understanding of the factors involved in war, and more than willing to trumpet his pride in such. I too want to believe our country is still the best, but in the last few decades we've been losing more than we've been winning and it's really time for a change in mentality.
@@user-js2dr9gv1u The very moment when you find out that S-300/400 and all older missiles like S-200 can be on duty with charged nuclear charges. Ida, they have the function of hitting ground coordinates) and you can shoot down a ballistic, cruise missile, a bomber, a fighter ... UFO, if necessary))
Lol what are you talking about. You don´t have to get through layers and layers of other air defense systems because the S300 is the HIMAD (long range) system. It´s protected by other, shorter range systems (SHORAD) and some VSHORAD systems. Of course you´re not gonna get close enough for any of them to be a threat. They only pose a problem because they can shoot down some of your weapons fired at the S300, but they def won´t shoot you down :) Besides all you really need to do is hit the radar(s) of the S300 or S400 site and you´ve crippled it enough to get through and carry on with your mission - attacking the air defenses is never a mission in itself. It only clears the way to what you really want to hit and what that air defense site was supposed to protect in the first place.
it's not just s-300. Russians deploy a network of integrated SAMs, long and short range s-300 is guarded by tors, panzyrs, buks. and on top of that are jamming gadgets. if buk m2 misses, then tor takes over,. If tor misses, panyzr takes over and so on. small diameter bomb can't get through.
Small diameter bombs can get through, you simply can't just send a couple and expect good results.
Oh, if a large scale conflict would happen, I believe both sides would suffer a degree of loss. SAMs are implemeted in scale and comoplexity according to given situation. I believe that Russians implementing SAMs of such scale that Israelis will have a big problem to do what they want.
@@moon512ify Brate nek si im reko!!!
Yup, you are technically correct. The West thought that they can get over with the S-300 and yet, they still feared it so much...... I think the West and their allies are simply pathetic liars and fear their own defense systems are failing!
Small diameter bombs can absolutely be stopped. Syrian Pantsir S1 wreaked the hell out of israeli small diameter bombs much more often than not
I really love these more detailed videos, i definitely feel a video like the one discussing nuclear strategy could benefit from these very fleshed out videos.
Nice! A lot better with the ad at the end. I even watched it and clicked on the link! 2 Month free is a nice deal. Thx!
8:37 The strategy for the small Diameter Bomb (SDB), would only work against the original first gen S-300 missiles, however the only S-300 missiles available right now out range by almost double the SDB's capability.
Nope
I love how everyone seems like a genius here
This kind of technical video are very very interresting. Thanks for your work. Good continuation, cheers from France
Great job. Love all the details.
it will be interesting to see how the Israeli air force performs against the S-300
Tinfoil Hoodie hide behind russian planes ;)
Captain Ivan Drago: They die
Probebly they have already an electronic warfare against this assessment. Seem that they taken the time to learn the system..
There are ways to defeat the SA-10. The later versions are harder to defeat, but it is still possible.
And if you mean let the slower, less maneuverable, and less capable Russian planes fly ahead and absorb all the SA-10 missiles, then you're correct Johnny. That's all they're really good for.
It can't see stealth!
You came across Janes edition of 1991? You have quite a comprehensive research capability.
Very thorough and informative. Thanks
I'm not interested one bit in missile technologies but I found this video very fascinating from beginning to end. Good work.
Can't wait for you to cover the S500 Prometheus when it is produced.
One new s500 does not really do anything. The thing they probably wouldn't be able to produce them in any substantial numbers under sanctions. Their domestic electronics is lagging behind for decades and their production capabilities are degrading for decades as well. Therefore, even if they have outstanding s500 (information about its real capabilities we don't have available) they actually have almost nothing. Same with T-14 Armata and Su-57 without new engines etc. Nice things on paper, but there are only handful of them IRL - turning out too little difference to see the difference.
When it's produced lol it's Russia they will make a couple for propaganda
The video is good and informative. The only problem is that the tracking range of the s300 is 250-300km which neutralizes any ew platform or suppression systems the west has. If that is considered the west will be in big trouble. Also, the s300 may be protected by other highly mobile and capable Sam systems like the pantsir, tor, buk, Osa etc. Take into consideration that the launchers can be very far from the radar, which means that there is a high probability that western launch platforms may be easily ambushed. It will be very risky to underestimate this system.
if i am right its the pantsyrs and tunguskas that are meant to protect the S300s/S400s at close range.
You are right. Pantsir's (and BuK, Tunguska, Osa, etc) are short ranged systems (well, the BuK is medium range, but you get my meaning) designed to protect critical infrastructure, like airports, power stations, factories, and so on.. and of course, critical military infrastructure like headquarters, and assets like planes, etc. The S-300 system is going to be well defended by these, im sure.
I only hope that whatever Syrian troops man them.. that they are well trained, and that they take their job seriously.
Osa is not capable systems.
@elizbar archvadze
They are part of the Syrian air defense equipment, and its better than nothing :)
But yes, Syria should put its main focus on the Pantsir and BuK systems.
nicholas austin the US can take them down easily tho kid :)
Great production value keep up the good work 👍
Brilliant analysis. Keep it up!
AAAw i hoped u will say more about the IFF system it uses. It was supposedly one of important reasoning of Russia when it decided to give this system to Syria after losing that scout plane
It's iff is not same for the Syrians (the s200 i mean)
In fact it's probably the only thing that they don't ship with the system to customers (i think)
I heard different. It supposedly has the orginal IFF but as i heard it will be offline most of the time and only used if needed for a short time as not to get the Israel too much data on it
Ma somali bad ahayd?
S-300/400 is mobile,so any mission that included taking those systems out would be very risky.By just maybe having S-300 that US bought from Croatia that had it from Ukraine means nothing.4 updated versions do mean a lot,so training on outdated and not used by Russia S-300 means absolute zero in actual combat engagement.Any mission against Russian AA systems would be thwarted by even greater radar stations,yes there are radars that also warn S-300/400 systems of incoming danger,also whats not mentioned here is that S systems are defended by fully mobile small to mid range AA systems like Tor-M3,Pantzir-M2 and Buk-M3.So S system is never alone and never standing target.
The Russians with subpar Airforce took out 18 S300 batteries with ease
Stingers did more damage to the Russian airforce than 18 S300 batteries
@@Milvus_In_Excelsis
dream on,Russia took SS fasist ukraine in 3 days,fuck off!
“S-300/400 is mobile,so any mission that included taking those systems out would be very risky”
Well this comment hasn’t aged well...
Ukraine’s meagre airforce of Cold War era aircraft has proven capable of knocking out S-300s without loss when armed with the right weapons. It really doesn’t matter all that much if it’s ‘mobile’ - A truck can’t outrun an anti-radiation missiles....
Even Azerbaijan (hardly a name that springs to mind when you think of the world’s great military players) has been able to reduce Armenia’s S-300s into piles of smouldering metal from the air with apparent ease.
In fact if anything, the general consensus regarding the S-300/400’s performance now seems to be mainly bemusement at how it hasn’t lived up to its massively over-hyped reputation at all.
@@shanetonkin2850
You haven't got a clue.Where is proof other than nazis say that any Russian S-300 system was defeated?I saw almost all systems of nazis destroyed with pics and footage(Telegram sources).S-300 is from Soviet era too.Also Nagorno Kharabah wasn't covered by S-300 system.S-300 is in Armenian mainland.Apparent ease?Azeri lost 50% of airforce,lol,wtf are you on about?They resolved to using drones in last weeks of war.Send hundreds of drones to knock out system not designed to hit drones,lol.Stupidities in your comment.
@@shanetonkin2850A truck can't outrun a radiation missile but a tor m1 SHORAD can shoot it down😮
Very, very informative and all done under 12 minutes. I take my hat off to you sir. Your video has also sparked some really interesting comments from others. Great work and I can't wait for your next video...Oh and I just subbed - Cheers!
Thanks for making this video.
The S-300 is very complex structure. Even though I lean towards American built models. The S-300 shouldn’t be looked down upon. It will be a fair match to its opponents.
Ukrainian Capitalist haha American hardware is a joke now. I'm a proud American but corruption has screwed us. F35, Naval ships they scraped after having to do some of the naval test while still tied to the dock. We r gonna get our asses whooped if we don't get hypersonic quick. Our navy is sitting ducks.
Ronald Swanson the f 35 is the future of warfare, with network abilities, really good radar, stealth, etc. It has amazing ability to see before seen and to work as part of a group, constantly sharing information from ground radar, fighter radar, awacs, ship radar, etc.
You really need to read Janes Defense. The US would win. By a lot. As in.....shit wouldn't even be funny kinda win.
datboi knows best hahahahahaha oh sorry HAHAHAHA. I live in Colorado I see Lockheed posting programmers positions. Always hacked. You know a F35 air pilot by his cough. I have family in the air force and know quite a bit. Also lived off of KGB Rd in Alaska directly across from airbase. They are a joke and a waist. Stealth is out dated tech now anyway. So if your fighting a real Air Force china Russia they will loose in a dog fight or just drop out of the sky from hacking
Paul Van ripper won against the us using only iranian assests in an exercise until the us changed the scope of it to allow us to win. The military is full of dumbness, trust that. Anyone who has been in would agree
I keep hearing in the video that the range is 150km or 200km... for S-300 with U classification and above, the range is 300km and change... from some sources on Russian military forums, people who are familiar with the technical details say that there is an additional *upper reserve margin* of ~10%... so that means that in general (nominal), the range is 300km but maxes out at 300 + (300*10%) = 330km... and for S-400 its 400km...not sure about the *upper reserve margin*... but in general, Russian military tech always has a bit extra capability than is generally advertised or known... its a funny thing...since with US tech, what you get is always less than what is advertised... Soo if you only apply a back of the envelope calculation/comparison...then comparing US vs Russian military tech would work the following way... Russian tech capability = What is advertised + (10-15%) ... and with US tech its always = What is advertised - (10-20%)... So yea, reliability and capability wise, Russian tech is a LOT more suitable for REAL WAR conditions...
PS: S-300, S-400... Range is NOT the only thing that is important... You also have to remember that these systems are designed to deal with Ballistic missiles as well as Anti-Satellite or NEAR SPACE (thats the term used by Russian military to refer to altitudes of between 100-200km, there are nuances to the type of warhead being used) warfare conditions. From Russian military forums, the general rule of thumb for S-300U and better, the Altitude is 100km (NOMINAL) + 10%...
I would also add that when dealing with Russian military tech, you have to think very very technically as its all about MATH... and with US tech its all about HYPE and Advertising...
That is a very bold statement you make there. It is true that the Russians have the upper hand regarding the SAM systems but it is hard to quantify by how much. Russia surely will not advertise any flaws.
Only a direct contact between American and Russian military would show who would perform better.
@@tuqe you need to stop watching and reading shit like CNN, MSNBC, NYT, Washington post, Daily Mail, BBC and the rest of the liberal propaganda outlets... if Russia was performing poorly then the West would not be sending all of its equipment to Ukraine... also, whats the point of using S300 by Russia in Ukraine if Ukraine has no airforce???
Excellent presentation - well made!
One of best description I read or saw... Thanks
F35 flew right past s300 & s400
@@M42135 🙄Mongrel propaganda
Bro gimme the powder you snort cos it's damn good shiit
" I will arm your enemies to the teeth" Vladimir Putin
It doesn’t sound like Vladimir Putin rhetoric.
@@BoboTheSunniestPalDog It very much does
that's silly. compare the military budgets. Listen to the actual interviews. Or provide a source.
@@jointspecialoperationscomm4838 what's the source??? Anyone with any sense knows that Russia, like most of the rest of the world are focusing on defensive strategies and everyone's understandably concerned about the US war machine..
It would be good if you mention references if you claim that Putin actually said it.
You forgot main advantage of system. It takes 5min to switch from battle mode to travel mode. This makes it relocates quickly. Also it never works alone. Its has supporting SAMs to deal with small targets.
Pretty freakin' terrifying! Thanks for the great video!
S300 Defended by Tor
1 week on and, all still quiet on the Syrian front.
Not anymore
Very, very good channel...Objective and serious. Subscribed...
Brilliantly made video, very interesting too.
What Yemen needs to do is ask for donations so that It can buy a Russian S-400 anti-aircraft system. Lets get started.
Hello friend.
Love you man!
Cool channel, I found this place because I was hoping to learn how S-300 system works. Great job.
hello
Hello
Hello
Can you do a video on Iron Dome?
Why? Its only got a 60% chance of interception
Kevin: i would not understimate anybody as we are just opinion staters on youtube. Im trying to source some Non-GMO popcorn and stock up so i can have some fun watching the best warriors fight and win/loose. Then will will continue to share some opinions .. I just cant stand some of the propaganda filth that comes out of the US tho.
@@Astemhat it never was overcomed dumbass if it was there would be dead people it has 90% chance and they not fire if target hitting open area
@@Kevin-yh8ol 90% chance and it was proven in 2014
I really like the video. Keep-up the good work.
I'd like to see a video on the AESA radar, EPIL, & more Naval stuff in general. Your videos are hugely interesting and simple to understand.
covert cabal Hi please make some videos on India too your analysis are better than others.
Send in a pair of F22s and some growlers. Boy oh boy, that'll be fun.
Su 35 already take a picture of F 22 in Syria and tail it without to much struggle and send it out Syrian sky ..but F 18 not around.. may be hiding somewhere..
Theatre nuclear weapons in Syria when? Really want another Cuban missile crisis if I’m honest with you, wouldn’t be pissed at all if Israel got nuked. Just saying.
ScarletDespair Behold the arrogant ignorance of the typical westerner. The world came to near total nuclear exchange over Cuba and Egypt. Your dismissive view of the third world proves just how lacking you are in historical and geopolitical awareness.
Hahahaha Russian Wil shoot it down F-35 Wil b on ground
Give Up He Cant...same Reason wont dismantle is chemical and biological weapons, i think they claim its to expensive....and yet giving 900 Million in AID to Israel...guess they dont need to borrow from IMF if US give them a blank cheque
Great video!!
Thank you Thank you Thank you. I have been looking for a quick and ready explanation of how the systems work, here it is!! Brilliant!! So, what is the difference between the TEL's? Some have control rooms fitted behind the cab, some have nothing more than a spare wheel there??
Please use the terms set by the builder and not the NATO names, it gets confusing. We all know what u are talking about using original names.
Reading comments below I remember how we in Germany realised that Americans are known as well brainwashed patriots who are blind to reality and live in their media-induced dreamworld.
For decades we believed to same dreams but a reunion with East Germany, when we inherited Russian weapons it becomes very clear that thanks to American dream we are far behind Russians. For example, our pilots who take over MiG-29 were in for a shock realising how much more capable are than F-16. That led to major USAF embarrassment because on every joint exercised our pilots in MiG-29 were very, very clear winners. It went so far that our MiG pilots challenged the US Top Gun pilots in the official competition which was every time rejected by the USA High Command. Interesting that whole story has been published in Wikipedia for many years until2014 when it was completely deleted. It was the USA which forced out government to sell 23 aircraft to useless and incapable Polish Airforce for, 1$ a piece, officially as a help to poor Poland. After that, our pilots stopped nagging Americans for competition and Americans all of a sudden was very keen to compete with our pilots in Tornados which we bought instead.
That much about American objectivity and honesty. It is nice to be a patriot but not a severely brainwashed because it can lead to a disastrous adventure. Think about in how many wars were the US involved and objectively in how many they won hands down taking in account their power? What, not a single one against any nation with more than 2 million population? What a shame for a superpower. or shall we say superpaperpower?
I liked your comment, but do you have a good source for the top gun pilots not wanting to face mig-29s? I would like to read more about this it sounds very interesting.
Alcorr me too
All that seething typical eurobitterness.....
ScarletDespair sure about that ??
iraq.. Vietnam.. Afghanistan.. Somalia... !!!
u do know that the mig-29 is the f-15 counter and not the f-16? both the f-15 and mig-29 are air superiority fighters while the f-16 is a multi purpose fighter with both attack and air fighting capabilities. sure the mig-29 is a better dogfighter... thats what it knows how to do. you are compering tomatoes and oranges.
Thanks for putting ads in the end of the video, doesn't destroy the cool intro :D
Nice video. Good quality.
The S300 is truly highly capable but what if the enemy shoots many cheap rockets towards them and after the S300 battery is empty, they could destroy them easily. Or am I missing something?
Your exactly correct......but how you'll launch cheap rockets or missiles from jets??......S300 radar covers whole of Israel......it can track Israeli jets from the moment they takeoff......and Russia could launch jets to intercept them
Magomed Arsaev let's talk about that strategy later after you able to detect all ghillied up s-300 hiding in the jungle, let's not forget pantzir battalion guarding the perimeter and let's not forget you never see the pantzir until they have a lock on your plane
Cheap rockets typically aren't accurate enough
S-300 are always backed by short-range antiair systems.
How do f35 knows there is sam beneath them? You never ever know their position until they have lock on you, unless russian traitor revealed their position to be attacked
You mentioned a raft of counter measures against the S300, but failed to mention that the S300 has counter measures for these. For this video to be taken seriously, you cannot just list off offensive counter measures, but also defensive counter measures and to discuss an attack on an isolated S300 system rather than a more realistic integrated air defense scenario is pure propaganda.
The missiles have homing capability to lock onto jammers, an aircraft transmitting a jamming signal is in fact acting like a homing beacon beckoning its own demise.
These systems also use multiple radars operating in different frequency bands - all have to be jammed concurrently, including ones that are not collocated, but integrated into the air defense system seriously complicating the task of effectively jamming.The S300 system automatically detects anti radiation missiles and deploys active decoys to draw the missiles off target.
GPS will be jammed so those glide bombs from 100km will be very inaccurate.
Finally, S300 is not deployed stand alone....it is a long range system intended to take out launch platforms (fighters and bombers), there will be multiple short range Pansir systems to deal with cruise missiles, drones and other such weapons.
Don't forget that there will also be aircraft defending the sites. While attacking aircraft are fighting the SAM system, they will also have to be fighting defending aircraft. The attacking aircraft will find it hard to concentrate on the S300.
Enemy Aircraft will also face jamming, both of their search and target radars as well as their communications.
Any one piece of an air defense system can be overwhelmed, jammed, spoofed, as can a system that has not been properly integrated or is incomplete, that is the current problem that Syrian air defenses are facing. The S300 deployments will fill some of the those gaps; much of the equipment Russia provided is to improve integration. Syria will be better defended, but Syria still has insufficient resources for really robust air defense.
Great video
Good interesting video.
Thanks for sharing
soon Israel is going to attack IRAN and Persians got the S300 so will see How capable it is in action.
LMAO Israel attack Iran, Go back to your water down Kool Aid- ------->Bibi Netcocksucker has spent 30 Years trying to get the US to attack Iran, 30 years...every year to him Iran is 3 Years Or less from having a Nuke and he has constantly been feeding that BS to Congress and as long as the US stayed in The JCPOA he couldnt Feed that BS, soon after the US does leave the JCPOA he's back at it...Its a Common Fact Jews dont Fight very well On the ground ( unless their targets are knife wielding Palestine and kids)...Sneak attacks by any means necessary is their motto.
It wont be 6 millions this time if they dare to attack Iran. It will be more than 6 millions lol.
How are you half jewish? theres no such thing and I dont say that to offend you, because Judaism isnt a race no matter how your people try to rewrite history. If anything, you're half European and the other I dont know since you didnt say. And the day the illegal state Israel attack Iran it will be their last day on this earth. You shouldnt hate to say it unless you support that scum gov or Zionism.
@@robertvuitton Being Jew is not about religion.
But theres no such thing as a Jewish race, so it is about religion. If anything the real Jewish were not the same as those now in the illegal state of Israel which are Europeans.
not first
Well done video and greatly enjoying hearing the voice over explaining the Su-300 system. It is much better hearing a real voice over an auto voice and the explanation felt like it was all or mostly facts and none to few opinion placed inside the video.
And I also like the way they're launched
Lets not forget an F35 demolished the latest SA22 Greyhound aka Pantsir? in Syria..
Citation required.
@@AdamAdamHDL ua-cam.com/video/Jwp8TTFgk_g/v-deo.html
@@evonrn2000
Showing it to be an F-35! The loss of the pantsir isn't latest news.
It's also worth noting the pantsir's crew were having a picnic at the time, as can be seen in the video. One dimwit even walked back to the vehicle to get his lunch box.
@milutinke97
It seems unlikely it had exhausted it's missiles.. If it had I would think either the crew would have totally abandoned it instead of loitering near by or it would be on route to resupply.
Using up your missiles means you're in a fight, imagine a tank crew loitering by their tank twiddling their thumbs after using all their rounds... Seems unlikely yea?
@@AdamAdamHDL in a War zone...very professional! That's exactly how they're killed..."run out of ammo..and wham!!!!" Or just overwhelm them with incoming projectiles from all angles...which Cruise missiles do very well
This channel JUST TALK ABOUT A SINGLE S 300 system and put many kind of weapon to destroyed it..Just want to say.. S 300 come with WHOLE PACKAGE defense, jamming and offensive capabilities,just name it,Russian got..Did you think Russian create a weapon for defensive or offensive without NOT know enemy weapon capability..and you brags about your F 18 Growler, Russian just send old aircraft Su 24 Fencer specialy for jamming and what happened,ask US Donald Cook crew and some US comm crew in Syria..
Oh boy...you just discovered America for him! Off course it comes with a whole package of systems that defend the S-300 itself...It Is a known fact! And if you'd follow the videos of this channel you would know that too,because it has been discussed already in one of the videos...So no playing the wise-guy here...
@@dimaignatiev6370
It not playing or pretending..when you make assessment some weapons system and against another some system and high light that US system can destroyed everything ..you show bias on your assessment..why they don't show what Russian got for counter US air force and navy weapon to negates beside S 300 system.. and for info,many time i see his videos..i know it bias or not
@@dimaignatiev6370
And by the way..he NOT EVEN SEE a true weapons system in whole world let alone RUSSIAN system..he just click Mr Google use some fancy word and some rumors to get attention..well he and you got one.
I didn't know russia had it's own 50 cent army of propagandists like china
The Russians said the Donald cook thing- Never Happen and I believe them before MSN or CNN, as to what happen to that Commercial flight in Ukraine, I blame the people who Put that Plane in a situation to get shot down, same reason the Russians blame Israel and not the Syrians,
the s300 doesn't work alone, it has always panstyr s1 or tor m1 to protect from HARM missils or tomahawk
for small bombs, there is TOR and PANTSIR systems, that are short to medium range to protect S300/400
S300 🤡💩
You do realize some nato countries use the s300.
What's it look like?
Obsolete, rusted and poor quality and junk and this is all just faked. But you know how Russians loved their faked videos
SAM sites are often layered defense system with multiple, overlapping coverage. A country like Syria will have limited number of these most sophisticated weapons whilst the countries that manufacture them will deploy them in numbers. The point of air defense systems is that while they are more expensive than the bombs that destroy them, the planes they down are more expensive than the SAM's. So its worth investing in them and in the long term they will be economically and strategically more viable. The down side to them is that they are defensive weapons and all they do is sit around waiting to be attacked while air power can be deployed in offensive operations away from the regions with these SAM sites. While Russian investment in SAM sites are waiting to be wrecked, American investment in air power is making profit in support of US forces engaged around the globe. The down side to this strategy is that you will have to be constantly at war for it to be sustainable, as evident with the United States.
Very good video 👍🏻
Thanks for this informative video; It's definitely more effective than Ambien..
The SAAB JAS 39 Gripen E was developed specifically to have an ECM suite that's ahead of the tripple digit systems.
The west still has the electronic advantage in that the West has GaN technology which let's things like jammers and radars have much more output or use much less power.
Big joke buddy
Well done.
Good work
Pretty detailed video, you forgot to mention that using radar jamming also gives away your position and modern SAM systems like the S-300P/V/F have home on jam targeting...
What many here are forgetting is the this system is hooked up also the the S-400, the S-400 will pick up a target before the S-300, but the S-300 will know it's coming before it's radars pick it up and be ready for it.
I like how clean these launchers are... Tires are so clean...
Google just recommend your videos to me and damn they got that right. I love your content! Instant sub, I love cold war Soviet shit especially. Keep up the excellent content!
Another great video. Keep up the good work. Can we get a video on the new Russian Krasukha 4 soon?
A highly interesting video for me, as I am a scale model builder and I own the following systems: S-300PMU, S-300V 9A82 and 9A83 TELARs and the S-400 as 51P6A TEL variant. (Besides of that I have following missile systems systems: SA-6, Buk M1, Tor M2 and BAL-E as TEL and Club-K variants). Thanks for the information!
What about pilot techniques for defeating the missile? Notching and dropping chaf - or does that only work on older systems?
The best video maker you are awesome
Extremely bad ass system!
Like others have said: the S-300 system is not and never will be deployed solo (at least by Russian forces).
One of the major cornerstones of Russian/Soviet defensive doctrine was layered defenses (defense-in-depth) using various systems that all operate at different ranges. If you want to talk about long-range antiaircraft systems, Russia has probably spent more time and effort and money on perfecting that field than anyone else. The same goes for some aspects of submarine warfare, but I digress.
Going back to the Cold War, I'll bet that one contributing factor lay in their difficulties with combat aviation. Pilots are expensive to train, and Soviet pilots would have been going up against crack NATO pilots (and the NATO training budgets). It is far cheaper to train a dozen enlisted men to operate a missile system than it is to train a fighter pilot, a missile system is a hell of a lot harder to locate than a fighter jet ('shoot and scoot' is a royal bitch to track), and that missile system can track/engage multiple targets without risking itself. Throw in layered defenses, with five or six different missile systems tracking any individual target, and the net result is a nearly impossible labyrinth of radar and missiles to evade.
People seem to forget that Russians are often very good at chess, with the lateral thinking skills required for it. If you need a solution for a problem, but want it to seem really complex to everyone else while actually being really simple, that's what Russia has long excelled at.
Hey! It’s been used in combat now lol.
S300/400 always protected with Pantsir BUK-M and Karusha-4 EW system surveillance radars along with Control System like ACACIA take for example India and Algeria they already operate large number of all those systems.
Power is rotation, every dog has it's day and what ever goes round comes around.
Так ну и что думаешь в итоге, хорошие? Можно брать или лучше посмотреть другую модель?
Excellent
@Covert Cabal Can you do a video of bomber warfare? Back in WW2, bombers were just bigger aircraft that carried larger amounts of bombs than fighters. Now however, I see bombers being rarely used and fighters seem to take their place most of the time. An examination of this will be nice keep up the good work!
What about missle/drone GPS jammers? A video on the topic would be appreciated.
I know that was an ICBM, but this still makes me want to watch Spies Like Us.
May please do a video on the tracking of aircraft carriers
So skill share take what is freely available and puts a price tag to it?