Why Do Modern Militaries Still Need Artillery

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 159

  • @Military-TV
    @Military-TV  2 роки тому +5

    US$195,000 What can a Black Hornet drone do? ua-cam.com/video/9IkaP6XMNZw/v-deo.html

    • @carkawalakhatulistiwa
      @carkawalakhatulistiwa Рік тому

      God of war is artillery. By stalin

    • @sarahoberling4436
      @sarahoberling4436 Рік тому

      So convient for their war mongering to bring out the technology of missiles and nuclear fusion/fission weaponry. AM I THE ONLY ONE HERE THAT KNOWS THAT NUCLEAR POWER IS NOT REALITY OTHER THAN HEATING WATER INTO STEAM. FEAR KEEPING US THIBKING WE NEED THEM FOR OUR PROTECTION. I ASSURE YOU IT IS ALIE. EVEN THE SIGIL OF LUCIFER SHOWS ONE WHO FEARS GOD ABLE TO DRAW THE COMPARISON OF THE SIGIL TO THE HELIOCENTRIC MODEL....UNLESS U BELIEVE THE SUN IS 63MILLION MILES AWAY

  • @thuggeegaming659
    @thuggeegaming659 2 роки тому +177

    Artillery is the most cost effective way of delivering massive firepower to a target. Even when air supremacy has been achieved, artillery is clearly the cheaper option compared to bombing. Also it can provide fire support when you need it indefinitely, while aircraft can only loiter in an area for a limited time before it has to refuel/rearm. With that said, the Ukraine war has become an artillery war because of highly effective anti-air capability on both sides has precluded any possibility of saturation bombing without the attacker suffering massive casualties.

    • @achatcueilleur5746
      @achatcueilleur5746 2 роки тому

      Artillery assholes can inflict damage to civilian buildings only when there is no armed civilians to kill artillery personnel. Artillery can kill unarmed civilians only. Artillery can't kill matching counter artillery.

    • @reboundrides8132
      @reboundrides8132 2 роки тому +2

      Russia failing to establish air supremacy or even superiority is what led to them being slaughtered. They should have gone in similar to the US vs. Iraq in 1991.

    • @justarandomguy3969
      @justarandomguy3969 2 роки тому +4

      @@reboundrides8132 russia went in pretty heavy with the aircrafts, but so many got shot down by simple javelins and similiar that russia stopped. losing an aircraft worth 65-85 million dollars by a javelin costing 250 000 for the launcher and 180 000 per missile doesnt make sense. a lot of their aircrafts are also not operational or under very bad condition like missing gps, on top of this they have more aircrafts than pilots since training pilots are expensive

    • @herptek
      @herptek 2 роки тому +3

      If there is one thing the Ukrainian war has proved it is the efficacy of artillery. With the advent of mass use of drones in recent conflicts one could have guessed that it would be relegated into a secondary role in the battlefield but that didn't turn out to be the case this time, quite the opposite.

    • @nashemachiri9293
      @nashemachiri9293 Рік тому

      This was a good thread 👍

  • @The88Cheat
    @The88Cheat 10 місяців тому +27

    I think people forget that artillery fire isn’t random. They are quite accurate weapons. I mean, we’ve only been at it for a couple hundred years. You tend to get good at things.

  • @alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi3723
    @alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi3723 2 роки тому +71

    Because guided missiles are expensive and can be outsmarted but you can't do shit to outsmart big bullets!

    • @achatcueilleur5746
      @achatcueilleur5746 2 роки тому

      Artillery assholes can inflict damage to civilian buildings only when there is no armed civilians to kill artillery personnel. Artillery can kill unarmed civilians only. Artillery can't kill matching counter artillery.

    • @ObamanableSnowman
      @ObamanableSnowman Рік тому +2

      Well man kinda true but less about out outsmarted. Cruise missles are way harder to stop especially fast and low flying ones. Artillary is behind the most modern missles but way cheaper and faster to produce for bulk effect even under economic constraint and sanctions on parts like electronics.

    • @alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi3723
      @alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi3723 Рік тому

      @@ObamanableSnowman until you get the Montana class with rail gun

    • @gezalesko3813
      @gezalesko3813 10 місяців тому +1

      these bullets are so dumb there is no way to make them change their mind..

    • @Evan_Bell
      @Evan_Bell 3 місяці тому

      C-RAM.

  • @youregenericjoeboibcyes
    @youregenericjoeboibcyes Рік тому +23

    for people who dont to wait 7minutes artillery is a big beast able to demolish shit from a distance

  • @bobcosmic
    @bobcosmic 2 роки тому +19

    War is a Racket by Maj Gen Smedley Butler !

  • @Vendell_23
    @Vendell_23 2 роки тому +16

    how about discussing the return of the light tanks next

    • @billwhoever2830
      @billwhoever2830 2 роки тому +1

      this didnt happen yet and is just what some imagine will happen
      all new mbts for big world powers are super heavy, this includes the t14 which is much heavier than the t90, all the leopard2, leclerc and abrams upgrades
      most light tanks being introdused are aimed in smaller militaries
      untill a large military like the US starts buying lightweight tanks (less than half of what an abrams is) all the light tank thing is just speculation

    • @Vendell_23
      @Vendell_23 2 роки тому +2

      @@billwhoever2830 the US recently procured their light tank called griffin II mpf meanwhile china and Russia already have it and soon India will procure their own light tank to counter china light tanks in the himalayas. South korea and Indonesia also have it and they are big military

  • @quanghuynguyenang8455
    @quanghuynguyenang8455 Рік тому +11

    Satellite is what make artilleries from "shoot to scare" to "shoot to kill" weapons

  • @meejinhuang
    @meejinhuang 2 роки тому +8

    It still gets the job done. It's a poor man's air strike.

  • @TioKeats
    @TioKeats 3 місяці тому +1

    Is there a reason the audio engineer and editor amplified your deep inhales before reading a line of the script?

  • @kurtmcdonald03416
    @kurtmcdonald03416 2 роки тому +6

    Because it's the best and cheapest weapon to pound structures to Oblivion as well as people and gurnt infantry

  • @drbendover7467
    @drbendover7467 2 роки тому +5

    You can only express your military power with artillery if your got lots of nukes, this is not a guess:)

  • @extraditori6604
    @extraditori6604 2 роки тому +12

    Артиллерия все ещё актуальна и сохраняет свою важность. Боги войны

  • @Glitchmouse2
    @Glitchmouse2 2 місяці тому +1

    I hope not these things’ explosion looks destructive as hell.

  • @afaha2214
    @afaha2214 3 місяці тому +1

    why I always get artillery cannons first in Civ 5

  • @christopherpotter114
    @christopherpotter114 Рік тому +4

    Wow, this is exactly what I was looking for!

  • @CarlosAlejandro.-ke6gr
    @CarlosAlejandro.-ke6gr Рік тому +3

    Cheap and you can hammer the hell out of the enemy with it with low effort, cost

  • @jeffwobrak5205
    @jeffwobrak5205 Рік тому +2

    Field Artillery - your low-cost option for those pesky neighbors.

  • @goodbonne452
    @goodbonne452 2 роки тому +21

    Artillery bombardment is given Russia superiority

    • @KondorDCS
      @KondorDCS 2 роки тому +2

      Aerial bombardment has given the US superiority.

    • @nikitatrusov4028
      @nikitatrusov4028 2 роки тому +10

      @@KondorDCS like in Vietnam, lol, army of military criminals and civilian killers

    • @diegomoreno7760
      @diegomoreno7760 2 роки тому

      @@nikitatrusov4028 or ucrania the rusian army of military criminals killing raping or stealing of ucranians citicients

    • @I_Stack_Metal
      @I_Stack_Metal 2 роки тому

      @@nikitatrusov4028 😆 lol ok.Chechnya and Bucha. Rapists and torture.

    •  2 роки тому +3

      ​@@nikitatrusov4028 Like in Checknya, Dagestan, Ingushetia and Syria where the orcs killed hundreds of thousands of civilans

  • @brianellinger6622
    @brianellinger6622 10 місяців тому +1

    what do you consider "modern"
    because most of dat we aint allowed to know about,....

  • @RR-us2kp
    @RR-us2kp Рік тому +2

    Artillery is king. And always will be king

  • @Niberspace
    @Niberspace 5 місяців тому +1

    That breathing is so annoying to listen to, fix your recording settings please

  • @adcaptandumvulgus4252
    @adcaptandumvulgus4252 2 місяці тому

    Not until there's something that can reliably track & counter its apogee, probably right

  • @JorjMusk
    @JorjMusk Рік тому +1

    To Cannon all men are equal Napoleon

  • @JonathanRodriguez-si2ng
    @JonathanRodriguez-si2ng 7 місяців тому +1

    Is it me or did have prenounced breathing

  • @meadervanwyk4722
    @meadervanwyk4722 5 днів тому

    Infantry don't move without artillery fire

  • @ROTNReaper
    @ROTNReaper Рік тому +1

    I made it to 1:28 before I had to pause this, leave a comment t and leave. That breathing in the mic is sending me elsewhere

  • @ernestenujuba6875
    @ernestenujuba6875 7 місяців тому

    God fights on the side with the best artillery.
    Napoleon Bonaparte

  • @markflanagan9187
    @markflanagan9187 2 роки тому +3

    I dont know why, but it sounds like your attached to a breathing machine

  • @KondorDCS
    @KondorDCS 2 роки тому +5

    When energy shields become a thing, then arty will face dethroning.

    • @JoaoSoares-rs6ec
      @JoaoSoares-rs6ec 2 роки тому +10

      Don't bet on it

    • @VunderGuy
      @VunderGuy 2 роки тому +3

      Couldn't that be said about infantry and Calvary too?

    • @JoaoSoares-rs6ec
      @JoaoSoares-rs6ec 2 роки тому +3

      @@VunderGuy they have been saying that for years, they said that wen bronze replaced stone, wen iron replaced bronze wen steel replaced iron, wen gunpowder first appeared as weapons, guess what we still use blades in war, they said that wen gunships first appeared tanks were history, the main spearhead in modern armies is still the tank, it will always be there

    • @Blue_Shamu_Gaming
      @Blue_Shamu_Gaming 2 роки тому +2

      Laser artillery lmao

    • @JoaoSoares-rs6ec
      @JoaoSoares-rs6ec 2 роки тому +1

      @@Blue_Shamu_Gaming that would be stupid, no way a laser could ever beat a conventional gun, to start conventional guns can do indirect fire, something impossible for a laser.

  • @m7ray
    @m7ray 26 днів тому

    Still? "Still" lol. Artillery has been inflicting huge losses on the battlefield since at least the 18th century and still does. And in most cases, this is the main loss. Why should that go back in time? I can understand if the word "still" would be used in relation to horses, but to artillery? Artillery is the god of war.

  • @Th3Nigma
    @Th3Nigma 2 роки тому +1

    I hate when sentences start with "Why" like a question, but have no question mark. Why don't you punctuate.

    • @aurorapaisley7453
      @aurorapaisley7453 2 роки тому +3

      Well, well, well. How the turns have tabled.

    • @EricTheActor805
      @EricTheActor805 Рік тому +1

      I hate when people end sentences with a period. Why don't you use question marks after asking a question?

    • @cristhianramirez6939
      @cristhianramirez6939 11 місяців тому +1

      Why dont you?

  • @quanghuynguyenang8455
    @quanghuynguyenang8455 6 місяців тому

    I still prefer Jet Bomber than Artillery

  • @ShaktiChaturvedi
    @ShaktiChaturvedi 4 місяці тому

    Easy, Artillery is the lord of war.

  • @JorjMusk
    @JorjMusk Рік тому

    God favours the army with superior artillery Napoleon

  • @Lucinda666
    @Lucinda666 Рік тому

    Yo Rocket vehicles are best instead artillery.

  • @bartfart3847
    @bartfart3847 5 місяців тому

    get a better microphone, learn how to take a breath before talking OR get a professional broadcaster to present your videos.
    The loud inhaling sound before you say anything is very annoying and distracting from the good content.

  • @wisdombriefly1324
    @wisdombriefly1324 2 роки тому +2

    Why can’t countries just have a hockey match? Who ever wins keeps the land

    • @simonmartin_ch
      @simonmartin_ch Рік тому +1

      How would that work? Its not like the countries fight over some unclaimed patch of land. Would you be willing to accept a hockey game where you could loose your own country to Russia?

    • @jaysonyoungman8772
      @jaysonyoungman8772 Рік тому +1

      Let's say North Korea wanted to annex your neighborhood, would be satisfied with being forced to revoke your former citizenship if they won a hockey game over it

    • @soilcredibility
      @soilcredibility Рік тому

      Because nobody cares about ice hockey?

    • @wmg5939
      @wmg5939 Рік тому

      @@simonmartin_ch well you could also loose that in a war

    • @simonmartin_ch
      @simonmartin_ch Рік тому

      @@wmg5939 That is true. But why would you accept such a hockey match in the first place? All risk - to maybe keep your land... Let's say a burglar enters your house, you welcome him with a weapon of choice - why don't you resolve this over a game of chess? Because it is an unsolicited attack with one-sided motivations with all your valuables at stake. In a war, the attacker wants something - but they don't offer anything in return if they lose a hypothetical game.

  • @DollarJonny
    @DollarJonny 2 роки тому +1

    + продолжайте , очень интересно !

  • @TheSilverChains
    @TheSilverChains 2 роки тому

    Bring the Rain.

  • @nizardzul4002
    @nizardzul4002 Рік тому

    finally, a video that looks like support the russia military equipment😂

  • @hlulanichavalala6737
    @hlulanichavalala6737 8 місяців тому

    Crazy

  • @David_Phoenix23
    @David_Phoenix23 Рік тому

    Artillery is stupid and OP and should be banned

  • @Dynioglowy1986
    @Dynioglowy1986 4 місяці тому

    You breathing before each sentence is f annoying!

  • @tc47101
    @tc47101 2 роки тому +2

    😮😮😮😊👍👍👍

  • @sumansingha4882
    @sumansingha4882 5 місяців тому

    😮😮😮😮😮😮

  • @vorrdegard2176
    @vorrdegard2176 2 роки тому

    Nah it's just a rock thrower 2100AD

  • @MrJakson112
    @MrJakson112 17 днів тому

    what a bunch of lazy AI slop