@@BBOCS_When talking to an abdul: Q. How many qurans? A. One quran Q. Is hafs quran a quran? A. Yes Q. Is warsh quran a quran? A. Yes Q. Is doori quran a quran? A. Yes Q. How many qurans? A. One quran Q. Are all qurans around the world same? A. Yes Q. Do the Sana manuscript and Birmingham manuscript have variants? A. Yes Q. Are qurans preserved word for word, letter for letter? A. Yes Q. In sura 37.12, one quran says "you", another "I"? A. They are different accents Q. How many ahrufs did muhamad recite? A. 7 Q. How many ahrufs did uthman destroy? A. 6 Q. How many ahrufs today? A. 7 Q. How many qiraats did muhamad recite? A. None Q. How many qiraats today? A. 10, 15, 20, 50 Q. Is Bible preserved? A. No Q. Is muhamad prophesied in the Bible? A. Yes Q. Did muhamad marry a child? A. No Q. How old was aisha? A. 6
@@BBOCS_contradictions are perfectly preserved: one quran says "you", another says "I". Dawah script: "they are different accents" 🤣🤣🤣 Hafs says "you (muhummud) wonder", while hamza, al kesai and khalaf versions say "I (allah) wonder". Which is the correct quran? This is the text of sura 37.12 in the hafs quran: بَلْ عَجِبْتَ وَيَسْخَرُونَ: “ But YOU are amazed, and they mock” hamza, al kesai and khalaf: بَلْ عَجِبْتُ وَيَسْخَرُونَ: “But I am amazed, and they mock” The difference between the two sentences is the speaker’s perspective. The first sentence uses “عَجِبْتَ” (you are amazed), indicating that the speaker is addressing someone else. The second sentence uses “عَجِبْتُ” (I am amazed), indicating that the speaker is referring to themselves.
@@BBOCS_Here's how abduls do taqi-yya and shift the goalposts: 1. Abduls claim all qurans around the world are perfectly preserved and are exactly the same word for word, letter for letter. 2. When we show them different qurans with different words they cunningly shift the goalposts claiming that the qurans may have different words but the differences are only due to different accents or different dialects. 3. When we then point out that the differences are not due to different accents or different dialects but that there are different words with different meaning altogether, they shift the goalposts again alleging that it's the context that is preserved because the different qurans complement each other. 4. When we again point out that certain verses in different qurans contradict each other, they make another excuse claiming all the different qurans are actually different qira'ats and were authorized by muhummud and so are preserved. 5. When we then ask them for proof from their qurans or hadiths where muhummud or allah authorized 10, 15 or 50 qira'ats, abduls start fuming and get triggered crying that we are Islamophobes and are lying 🤦 6. So notice how they shift their goalposts multiple times: "Perfectly preserved word for word" to "different words but different accents or dialects" to "context is the same" to "all qira'ats authorized by muhummud"!
They all have the same weird thinking. They never admit to being wrong with Christians but among themselves they know they’re wrong and telling them lies. Can’t trust them to be honest. Sad.
When talking to an abdul: Q. How many qurans? A. One quran Q. Is hafs quran a quran? A. Yes Q. Is warsh quran a quran? A. Yes Q. Is doori quran a quran? A. Yes Q. How many qurans? A. One quran Q. Are all qurans around the world same? A. Yes Q. Do the Sana manuscript and Birmingham manuscript have variants? A. Yes Q. Are qurans preserved word for word, letter for letter? A. Yes Q. In sura 37.12, one quran says "you", another "I"? A. They are different accents Q. How many ahrufs did muhamad recite? A. 7 Q. How many ahrufs did uthman destroy? A. 6 Q. How many ahrufs today? A. 7 Q. How many qiraats did muhamad recite? A. None Q. How many qiraats today? A. 10, 15, 20, 50 Q. Is Bible preserved? A. No Q. Is muhamad prophesied in the Bible? A. Yes Q. Did muhamad marry a child? A. No Q. How old was aisha? A. 6
They are making new context everytime they try to defend the Qur'an thus in essence they are refuting their ancient scholars and in the process corrupting the words of Allah.
In the early 1920s in Egypt, High School Students were getting wrong answers to their Religious exams They showed the teachers in their Qurans they had the correct answers and were given an incorrect answer Now Muslims are trying to say oooh oooh it's the different recitations How can you have different recitations and get different answers on an exam
@@danielanthony8373 And what causes intellectual dishonesty? The Spirit of deceit which they get from their father the devil, that serpent of old who was a liar from the beginning. RIAI
This is ABSOLUTE PROOF OF WHAT THE BIBLE SAYS. " BECAUSE THEY DID NOT LOVE THE TRUTH, GOD WILL GIVE THEM OVER TO A POWERFUL DELUSION. THESE CHANNELS ARE GETTING TO THE POINT THAT WE MIGHT AS WELL FORGET ABOUT GIVING MUSLIMS THE GOSPEL, BUT ACTUALLY USE THESE VIDEOS TO SHOW ATHIESTS THAT THE BIBLE SAYS THIS WILL HAPPEN, AND WE NOW SEE WITHOUT OUR OWN EYES THE PROPHECY BEING FULFILLED. ITS MINDBLOWING TO KNOW THAT WE ARE IN SUCH TIMES
So as usual, the Muslim is going to claim there's two ways Mohammad recited the verse? With zero evidence to back it up? There's another problem? If Mohammad recited two versions of a verse? It must mean Allah revealed two versions to him? Why? What's the point? You also can't have two "perfect" versions of the same verse? One has to be inferior? Muslims always resort to "it could mean this"? "Maybe it means this"? "This verse is rejected"? "Scholars make mistakes... sometimes"? ""It's hypothetical"? "Six year old girls in Mohammad's time were like 18 year olds today"? "It's abrogated"? "It's weak"? "It was written by an enemy of Mohammad"? "Jews did it "? And, "a goat ate it"? How is this plethora of excuses and nonsense, needed to explain a supposedly perfect message from God?
In an extremely authentic Hadith, it clearly teaches that a naked Moses chased a STONE that ran away with his clothes!!! Are you serious? On that alone, Islam is false.
At 10 min the abdool just can't stop babbling to try and distract and confuse. He knows he lost badly and can't argue his case from the texts, so he uses the standard dawa method of shouting and diverting.
If there are 2 choices which are mutually exclusive, then saying 1 is correct, it automatically means the other is incorrect. Saying that is not the case when the guy also states he's not capable of passing judgement, is ludicrous. We're watching islam evolving as another one of their assertions (preservation) is shown to be false.
In diplomatic language usage rather than saying something is wrong is specifically referrs to the alternative and say it is correct and this necessarily implies that the Diplomat is referring to the correct version rather than the erroneous version
Am not a Muslim but I must say in conversation as human beings the Muslim Person has spoken well and apologised and stayed respectful, I give him that respectfully. And I will leave it as that, conversation is conversation and he is talking to 3 people at the same time and it is more difficult, and the male and lady did not say sorry or keep it calm when it’s their turn to apologise. Once again as human beings communicating either way respect must be there and continue with conversation. This is just a humble human thought to my mind.
Hello all. Follower of Jesus the Christ here. I see both points, but during the coconut butter lotion saga, i agree with the bro Kadeem that both comments are correct. The majority and minority are both correct and Kadeems point that the context is important, is true as well. However, the foundation and doctrine of what he follows is incorrect. His point is correct but his doctrine is not.
The first thing said in the video was how Muslims claim that 'there is only one Quran with no variants,' and that 'every Quran is the same as it was with Muhammad, letter for letter, word for word.' However, the existence of different Quran versions that discuss the same verse but with a word missing shows how that claim is false. That was the point. That’s why they were pressing on 'which was said, this or that,' because you can’t have both when you claim your book has been preserved letter for letter, word for word.
Let me misrepresent the position as being only of pronunciation ... no let me speak... stop interrupting me... let me continue with this misrepresentation ! You're not letting me speak. I still have more of this non-issue to expound on... An issue that I'm not an expert in, and others must have answered this already... Islamic non-discussion!
Contradictions are perfectly preserved: one quran says "you", another says "I". Dawah script: "they are different accents" 🤣🤣🤣 Hafs says "you (muhummud) wonder", while hamza, al kesai and khalaf versions say "I (allah) wonder". Which is the correct quran? This is the text of sura 37.12 in the hafs quran: بَلْ عَجِبْتَ وَيَسْخَرُونَ: “ But YOU are amazed, and they mock” hamza, al kesai and khalaf: بَلْ عَجِبْتُ وَيَسْخَرُونَ: “But I am amazed, and they mock” The difference between the two sentences is the speaker’s perspective. The first sentence uses “عَجِبْتَ” (you are amazed), indicating that the speaker is addressing someone else. The second sentence uses “عَجِبْتُ” (I am amazed), indicating that the speaker is referring to themselves.
There is leaked video on YT with Muslim scholars acknowledging their doubts about quranic preservation. Friendly Ex Muslim played it recently on his channel
Ah come on... You still talk about the preservation of the Quran... Of course it is .. if you really know how it is preserved you cant make these silly claims..just ask the right muslim
folks do your own due diligence. read the Bible and quran. bible Jeremiah 8 8 ' scribes falsified the Bible ' quran ' this quran a final revelation from god preserved for eternity ' ps kudos to belal Muhammad winning u f c title in Manchester uk last nite. we are the replacements
Jai and the girl has a bad timing in conversation...when 3 vs. 1 you need very concentrate and respectfull to go point by point, thy also interupt Godlogic, pls. more selfcontrol.
@@JohannesIII-XVI The muslim guy is dishonest because he knows that Brubaker's book since 2020 has exposed the different Qurans. Also Dr Shadi Nasser, arabic studies lecturer at Harvard university has been interviewed in a lot of channels, like Mythvision, and he says there are 700 Qurans and not one is the same. So, how can a book like that be the final Word for the whole world , with flying carpets like Sinbad and Alibaba stories???
So the correct way of reading..means .. Only what's correct for that scholar..or ppl.. So scholars and ppl can have whatever reading they want.. Fine.. But that still leaves the fact the readings are different and mean different things to the point scholars and ppl have to choose which to follow.. Which means there isn't one Quarn but multiple It's just this Muslim affirms them all even though they're different to the point you have to choose which one is correct for you.. Corruption.
Christians were acting like muslims on this one. Rude, interrupting, and then judging & muting him whenever he interrupted. Brothers, we should have a degree of humility in these debates...especially knowing that we carry the truth and, therefore, are in the winning position. The debate shouldn't be mutual. We should be teaching while they debate.
@elitecompany1878 The Pharisees sought to stone Christ to DEATH...multiple times. He remained Christ-like. I have an idea. How bout we NOT try to rationalize and justify OUR ungodly behavior DESPITE whatever wrong outsiders do/say to us? Christians love to say "None of us are perfect" to cover up the fact that none of us are even TRYING to be.
when he is asked why scholar didnt say that but I am just a layman....otherwise he keeps tap dancing around. Get out clause for muslims - scholars know best or if all fails allah/satan knows best lol.
Kadeem, in what world would the following two statements both be correct at the same time?. rasool allah is pious. rasool allah is an evil pdf-ile. Using your argument, both sentences can be correct and non-contradictory. Don't be offended if someone comes and knocks on your door and tells you the second sentence. According to your twisted logic, that person is "implying" mohamed is pious. RIAI
Abdool, if there are two choices and I say this one is correct then by implication, I'm saying the other one is wrong. If both choices were correct why would I say this one was correct? I would say there were both correct. What is so difficult to understand about this?!!! Explicit, implicit, inductive, deductive, analogy, allusion...go and study these terms buddy before you make a fool if yourself next time. RIAI A kid would be able to understand this.
Abdool, what don't you understand about what Avery said? Do you need context to distinguish a statement from a question? Abdool, which school did you go to? Have you no knowledge of the structure of a question sentence? Are you for real buddy? 🤣🤣🤣🤣 What the hell are you doing being on UA-cam?!!!!!! RIAI
God bless you! 🙏
@@JaiAndDoC Thank you for what you both do! God bless you too!
@@JaiAndDoC i really enjoy you two.. Jai and DoC with Godlogic. He has impressed me from the age of 19 and now hevis 29? God bless the three of you.
@@BBOCS_When talking to an abdul:
Q. How many qurans?
A. One quran
Q. Is hafs quran a quran?
A. Yes
Q. Is warsh quran a quran?
A. Yes
Q. Is doori quran a quran?
A. Yes
Q. How many qurans?
A. One quran
Q. Are all qurans around the world same?
A. Yes
Q. Do the Sana manuscript and Birmingham manuscript have variants?
A. Yes
Q. Are qurans preserved word for word, letter for letter?
A. Yes
Q. In sura 37.12, one quran says "you", another "I"?
A. They are different accents
Q. How many ahrufs did muhamad recite?
A. 7
Q. How many ahrufs did uthman destroy?
A. 6
Q. How many ahrufs today?
A. 7
Q. How many qiraats did muhamad recite?
A. None
Q. How many qiraats today?
A. 10, 15, 20, 50
Q. Is Bible preserved?
A. No
Q. Is muhamad prophesied in the Bible?
A. Yes
Q. Did muhamad marry a child?
A. No
Q. How old was aisha?
A. 6
@@BBOCS_contradictions are perfectly preserved:
one quran says "you", another says "I".
Dawah script: "they are different accents" 🤣🤣🤣
Hafs says "you (muhummud) wonder", while hamza, al kesai and khalaf versions say "I (allah) wonder". Which is the correct quran?
This is the text of sura 37.12 in the
hafs quran:
بَلْ عَجِبْتَ وَيَسْخَرُونَ: “
But YOU are amazed, and they mock”
hamza, al kesai and khalaf:
بَلْ عَجِبْتُ وَيَسْخَرُونَ:
“But I am amazed, and they mock”
The difference between the two sentences is the speaker’s perspective. The first sentence uses “عَجِبْتَ” (you are amazed), indicating that the speaker is addressing someone else. The second sentence uses “عَجِبْتُ” (I am amazed), indicating that the speaker is referring to themselves.
@@BBOCS_Here's how abduls do taqi-yya and shift the goalposts:
1. Abduls claim all qurans around the world are perfectly preserved and are exactly the same word for word, letter for letter.
2. When we show them different qurans with different words they cunningly shift the goalposts claiming that the qurans may have different words but the differences are only due to different accents or different dialects.
3. When we then point out that the differences are not due to different accents or different dialects but that there are different words with different meaning altogether, they shift the goalposts again alleging that it's the context that is preserved because the different qurans complement each other.
4. When we again point out that certain verses in different qurans contradict each other, they make another excuse claiming all the different qurans are actually different qira'ats and were authorized by muhummud and so are preserved.
5. When we then ask them for proof from their qurans or hadiths where muhummud or allah authorized 10, 15 or 50 qira'ats, abduls start fuming and get triggered crying that we are Islamophobes and are lying 🤦
6. So notice how they shift their goalposts multiple times:
"Perfectly preserved word for word" to "different words but different accents or dialects" to "context is the same" to "all qira'ats authorized by muhummud"!
The Muslim shuffle is real.
DoC is spot on. A self proclaimed layman correcting ancient scholars is crazy.
He says he's going to use logic and then proceed to use mental gymnastics to try and justify two statements that are polar opposites.
They all have the same weird thinking. They never admit to being wrong with Christians but among themselves they know they’re wrong and telling them lies. Can’t trust them to be honest. Sad.
This is why an ex Muslim becomes the best Christian’s. Jai does plenty of work to show the truth to the misguided. ✝️🙏🏽✝️🙏🏽
When talking to an abdul:
Q. How many qurans?
A. One quran
Q. Is hafs quran a quran?
A. Yes
Q. Is warsh quran a quran?
A. Yes
Q. Is doori quran a quran?
A. Yes
Q. How many qurans?
A. One quran
Q. Are all qurans around the world same?
A. Yes
Q. Do the Sana manuscript and Birmingham manuscript have variants?
A. Yes
Q. Are qurans preserved word for word, letter for letter?
A. Yes
Q. In sura 37.12, one quran says "you", another "I"?
A. They are different accents
Q. How many ahrufs did muhamad recite?
A. 7
Q. How many ahrufs did uthman destroy?
A. 6
Q. How many ahrufs today?
A. 7
Q. How many qiraats did muhamad recite?
A. None
Q. How many qiraats today?
A. 10, 15, 20, 50
Q. Is Bible preserved?
A. No
Q. Is muhamad prophesied in the Bible?
A. Yes
Q. Did muhamad marry a child?
A. No
Q. How old was aisha?
A. 6
✝️RUTH always prevails💫🙏🏽💫🙏🏽
They are making new context everytime they try to defend the Qur'an thus in essence they are refuting their ancient scholars and in the process corrupting the words of Allah.
In the early 1920s in Egypt, High School Students were getting wrong answers to their Religious exams
They showed the teachers in their Qurans they had the correct answers and were given an incorrect answer
Now Muslims are trying to say oooh oooh it's the different recitations
How can you have different recitations and get different answers on an exam
Islam is Filled with Lost Souls !
Where Nonsensical is the Norm ! Haha 🤭
Yes, and none of them question anything. It's almost like they don't want to hear what is true.
Islam entering every home , right?
@@mnoorbhai wrong. without lies Islam dies😁
@@Avenged7Xs Without manipulations fabrications distortion extractions interpolations Chritianity is crumbling like a square table with three legs .
@@Avenged7Xs you’ll wrong islam is the truth and you’ll admit it if not in this world you will on the day of judgement.
Sahih Muslim 146: Islam will crawel back,just as a snake crawels back into its hole.
That's wild. They can't even catch it.
Jai and his wife is a dynamic duo by the grace of Jesus Christ
DOC you are my hero
Very dishonest, this guy.
Causing corruption in the land! 😂
This is the definition of intellectual dishonesty
Following the Father of Lies! Satanic cult.
@@danielanthony8373 And what causes intellectual dishonesty?
The Spirit of deceit which they get from their father the devil, that serpent of old who was a liar from the beginning.
RIAI
Straight out of the gate :'I'm not qualified to comment on this, but I will anyway'
Two different statements: one of them affirms knowledge, the other one expresses doubt. It's not complicated.
This is ABSOLUTE PROOF OF WHAT THE BIBLE SAYS. " BECAUSE THEY DID NOT LOVE THE TRUTH, GOD WILL GIVE THEM OVER TO A POWERFUL DELUSION. THESE CHANNELS ARE GETTING TO THE POINT THAT WE MIGHT AS WELL FORGET ABOUT GIVING MUSLIMS THE GOSPEL, BUT ACTUALLY USE THESE VIDEOS TO SHOW ATHIESTS THAT THE BIBLE SAYS THIS WILL HAPPEN, AND WE NOW SEE WITHOUT OUR OWN EYES THE PROPHECY BEING FULFILLED. ITS MINDBLOWING TO KNOW THAT WE ARE IN SUCH TIMES
This Muslim is just constantly reframing rather than dealing With the frame. This is a deception technique.
Above his pay grade? Brother is on minimum wage. Needs to level up. 🙏🏽
😂😂😂😂😂
@@josephkawhena1746 minumum wage? Dude is paying off a debt
The islamacope is real!
Kadeem contradicts the law of contradiction
Kadeem IS a contradiction.
RIAI
AMEN 🙏🙏🙏🙏
So as usual, the Muslim is going to claim there's two ways Mohammad recited the verse? With zero evidence to back it up?
There's another problem? If Mohammad recited two versions of a verse? It must mean Allah revealed two versions to him? Why? What's the point? You also can't have two "perfect" versions of the same verse? One has to be inferior?
Muslims always resort to "it could mean this"? "Maybe it means this"? "This verse is rejected"? "Scholars make mistakes... sometimes"? ""It's hypothetical"? "Six year old girls in Mohammad's time were like 18 year olds today"? "It's abrogated"? "It's weak"? "It was written by an enemy of Mohammad"? "Jews did it "? And, "a goat ate it"?
How is this plethora of excuses and nonsense, needed to explain a supposedly perfect message from God?
In an extremely authentic Hadith, it clearly teaches that a naked Moses chased a STONE that ran away with his clothes!!! Are you serious? On that alone, Islam is false.
MUSLIM; "I've come on to debate, but obviously I can't debate you on this. I had no idea we were debating the Quran when the topic is "THE QURAN."
Bruh tried to sound so knowledgable. Again, olympic-level mental gymnastics at it's best.
At 10 min the abdool just can't stop babbling to try and distract and confuse. He knows he lost badly and can't argue his case from the texts, so he uses the standard dawa method of shouting and diverting.
If there are 2 choices which are mutually exclusive, then saying 1 is correct, it automatically means the other is incorrect.
Saying that is not the case when the guy also states he's not capable of passing judgement, is ludicrous.
We're watching islam evolving as another one of their assertions (preservation) is shown to be false.
Making authoritative statements...
While using
The I'm just a layman defense
That's a bold strategy cotton
Scholars !?....... BLAHAHAHHAHahahahahhahahahahhahaaaa !!!!!..... "Scholars !!!!".......HAHHAHAHHahahhahhaaaa....
Im sure all Muslims who don’t know arabic, who would tell other debaters they don’t know arabic, would still act with someone who knows arabic
God bless Doc abundantly
In diplomatic language usage rather than saying something is wrong is specifically referrs to the alternative and say it is correct and this necessarily implies that the Diplomat is referring to the correct version rather than the erroneous version
"This is above my paygrade"
"Then why did you come, man?"
LOL
He is intentionally pretending as though he doesn’t understand the difference between making a statement and asking a question. 🤷🏿♂️
Am not a Muslim but I must say in conversation as human beings the Muslim Person has spoken well and apologised and stayed respectful, I give him that respectfully. And I will leave it as that, conversation is conversation and he is talking to 3 people at the same time and it is more difficult, and the male and lady did not say sorry or keep it calm when it’s their turn to apologise.
Once again as human beings communicating either way respect must be there and continue with conversation.
This is just a humble human thought to my mind.
Hello all. Follower of Jesus the Christ here.
I see both points, but during the coconut butter lotion saga, i agree with the bro Kadeem that both comments are correct. The majority and minority are both correct and Kadeems point that the context is important, is true as well. However, the foundation and doctrine of what he follows is incorrect. His point is correct but his doctrine is not.
The first thing said in the video was how Muslims claim that 'there is only one Quran with no variants,' and that 'every Quran is the same as it was with Muhammad, letter for letter, word for word.'
However, the existence of different Quran versions that discuss the same verse but with a word missing shows how that claim is false. That was the point. That’s why they were pressing on 'which was said, this or that,' because you can’t have both when you claim your book has been preserved letter for letter, word for word.
Sam would say “stop tap dancing.”
The beautiful Lady is very smart, would love to shake her hand 🖐️🥀🥀🥀
When youneed to prove yourself with insincerity youre desperate.
You diffend Quran with ignorance.
The question is where could I find a cocobutter lotion? 😂
Islam is based on this one simple fact - Of all the people in the world, the god of Islam chose a PDF file to speak for him.
Let me misrepresent the position as being only of pronunciation ... no let me speak... stop interrupting me... let me continue with this misrepresentation ! You're not letting me speak. I still have more of this non-issue to expound on... An issue that I'm not an expert in, and others must have answered this already...
Islamic non-discussion!
Contradictions are perfectly preserved:
one quran says "you", another says "I".
Dawah script: "they are different accents" 🤣🤣🤣
Hafs says "you (muhummud) wonder", while hamza, al kesai and khalaf versions say "I (allah) wonder". Which is the correct quran?
This is the text of sura 37.12 in the
hafs quran:
بَلْ عَجِبْتَ وَيَسْخَرُونَ: “
But YOU are amazed, and they mock”
hamza, al kesai and khalaf:
بَلْ عَجِبْتُ وَيَسْخَرُونَ:
“But I am amazed, and they mock”
The difference between the two sentences is the speaker’s perspective. The first sentence uses “عَجِبْتَ” (you are amazed), indicating that the speaker is addressing someone else. The second sentence uses “عَجِبْتُ” (I am amazed), indicating that the speaker is referring to themselves.
Say goodbye!
There is leaked video on YT with Muslim scholars acknowledging their doubts about quranic preservation. Friendly Ex Muslim played it recently on his channel
When you read the quran, keep logical aside. 😂😂😂😂😂
Kareem you are saying the same like Yssir Qadhi.... THEY ARE ALL CORRECT QURANS...😊😊😊
Poor Kadeem
Ah come on... You still talk about the preservation of the Quran... Of course it is .. if you really know how it is preserved you cant make these silly claims..just ask the right muslim
Shouldn’t throw stones if you live in a glass house
they have to lie there's no other way
Muhammad rasulullah inner brain mistakes
This is craze
Muslims sorry for your souls.please repent and follow the very true GOD.
folks do your own due diligence. read the Bible and quran. bible Jeremiah 8 8 ' scribes falsified the Bible ' quran ' this quran a final revelation from god preserved for eternity ' ps kudos to belal Muhammad winning u f c title in Manchester uk last nite. we are the replacements
SGHUT UP TALKING OVER EACH OTHER
Jai and the girl has a bad timing in conversation...when 3 vs. 1 you need very concentrate and respectfull to go point by point, thy also interupt Godlogic, pls. more selfcontrol.
I think you would also lose your patience with a liar that is not arab!
@@murielpucoe9213 ...its just a learning and selfdisciplin factor, has nothing to do with race or religion.
@@JohannesIII-XVI The muslim guy is dishonest because he knows that Brubaker's book since 2020 has exposed the different Qurans. Also Dr Shadi Nasser, arabic studies lecturer at Harvard university has been interviewed in a lot of channels, like Mythvision, and he says there are 700 Qurans and not one is the same. So, how can a book like that be the final Word for the whole world , with flying carpets like Sinbad and Alibaba stories???
SHUT UP AND STOP INTERFERING KADEEM ROSE!!!!!!!!!
To be honest thought thye were rude to the muslim and laughing and mocking. I feel for him trying to speak but i pray he comes to the lord
They're not being rude.. they're laughing because he doesn't know what he's talking about.. Dude was trying to lie about Arabic to Arabs 😂
So the correct way of reading..means ..
Only what's correct for that scholar..or ppl..
So scholars and ppl can have whatever reading they want..
Fine..
But that still leaves the fact the readings are different and mean different things to the point scholars and ppl have to choose which to follow..
Which means there isn't one Quarn but multiple
It's just this Muslim affirms them all even though they're different to the point you have to choose which one is correct for you..
Corruption.
Rrrr
Christians were acting like muslims on this one. Rude, interrupting, and then judging & muting him whenever he interrupted.
Brothers, we should have a degree of humility in these debates...especially knowing that we carry the truth and, therefore, are in the winning position. The debate shouldn't be mutual. We should be teaching while they debate.
@@dararebreed dude was not being honest. He was interrupting more than anyone
@elitecompany1878 The Pharisees sought to stone Christ to DEATH...multiple times.
He remained Christ-like.
I have an idea. How bout we NOT try to rationalize and justify OUR ungodly behavior DESPITE whatever wrong outsiders do/say to us?
Christians love to say "None of us are perfect" to cover up the fact that none of us are even TRYING to be.
They should. This guy is saying absolutely nothing just waffles like all muslims do. Trying to tell Arabs what it says in Arabic and being dishonest
Islam is c
gurand is preserved. period. you can say whatever you want
Doesn't prove it comes from God period. You can say whatever you want
Error can also be preserved. My maths book has no error and is also perfectly preserved. Is it from god also?
By he Way the Quran is not preserved 😂😂😂 Uthman burned the Qurans and demanded a rewrite 😅
when he is asked why scholar didnt say that but I am just a layman....otherwise he keeps tap dancing around. Get out clause for muslims - scholars know best or if all fails allah/satan knows best lol.
Brain damaged 😢
Kareem is idiotical
Kadeem, in what world would the following two statements both be correct at the same time?.
rasool allah is pious.
rasool allah is an evil pdf-ile.
Using your argument, both sentences can be correct and non-contradictory.
Don't be offended if someone comes and knocks on your door and tells you the second sentence.
According to your twisted logic, that person is "implying" mohamed is pious.
RIAI
Abdool, if there are two choices and I say this one is correct then by implication, I'm saying the other one is wrong.
If both choices were correct why would I say this one was correct? I would say there were both correct.
What is so difficult to understand about this?!!!
Explicit, implicit, inductive, deductive, analogy, allusion...go and study these terms buddy before you make a fool if yourself next time.
RIAI
A kid would be able to understand this.
Abdool, what don't you understand about what Avery said?
Do you need context to distinguish a statement from a question?
Abdool, which school did you go to?
Have you no knowledge of the structure of a question sentence?
Are you for real buddy? 🤣🤣🤣🤣
What the hell are you doing being on UA-cam?!!!!!!
RIAI