Integration 4 • Reverse Chain Rule pt. 1 • P2 Ex11D • 🎲

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 44

  • @tayubh_1033
    @tayubh_1033 2 роки тому +52

    what a legend you are mr bicen, will forever be known as the maths lifesaver

  • @xubarney1326
    @xubarney1326 Рік тому +5

    Three years later, I'm watching this on the same date lol.

  • @hannahwright410
    @hannahwright410 2 роки тому +17

    watching this the morning of my a level exam haha

  • @rev0cs
    @rev0cs 8 місяців тому +7

    so basically to be good at the reverse chain rule you have to be VERY good at differentiation lol

    • @BicenMaths
      @BicenMaths  8 місяців тому +12

      Absolutely! Differentiation is the key to integration - I recommend asking yourself “what differentiates to this function” instead of “integrate this function”. Originally integration was called anti differentiation!

  • @christopheramazigo4691
    @christopheramazigo4691 Місяць тому +1

    what happened to the cosx when we intergarted the cosx^2sin

    • @BicenMaths
      @BicenMaths  Місяць тому

      It has ‘gone’ because when you differentiate what we wrote as the answer, you get the extra cosx coming back again because of the chain rule! The fact it was there in the thing we were integrating to begin with was helpful, because it came from the result of differentiation using the chain rule! Hope that helps!

    • @christopheramazigo4691
      @christopheramazigo4691 Місяць тому

      @@BicenMaths thank you i now understand from this and watching a latter video that the reverse chain rule is only applied when the outer function looks like it could have been created from differientiaitng the inner function
      Thank you your the best maths teacher ever
      I hope you get knighted someday

  • @ellaaman
    @ellaaman 2 роки тому +2

    why did we not raise the power of the 'consider e^x2+1' by one? 16:48mins thank you!

    • @BicenMaths
      @BicenMaths  2 роки тому +5

      Because when you integrate e^x it integrates to e^x - in other words, the power remains the same. You only increase the power by one for polynomial terms, and this is an exponential!

  • @user-kv2qv9bd4f
    @user-kv2qv9bd4f 2 роки тому +6

    Mr Bicen, as I am self-studying I don’t have access to the topic tests that are generally done in schools.
    Do you have any suggestions on how I can perhaps devise a topic test for myself to test my understanding of the A2 content I have covered so far?

    • @BicenMaths
      @BicenMaths  2 роки тому +10

      I would offer you these options:
      1) access my exam questions file in the Bicen Maths Google Drive here, and select some from the already categorised topics that have a reasonable number of marks. Try them in exam conditions drive.google.com/drive/folders/1uUbx_lRLLE9O4WnI8TS77dUOJw_DjljV
      2) use the mixed exercises from the textbook and randomly select a set number of questions to do in timed conditions
      3) perhaps better than the mixed exercises, use the review exercises from the textbook, as they are past exam questions and tell you how many marks they are worth - then you can calculate the amount of time you’d have by multiplying the marks by 1.2 to get the number of minutes you’d have in the exam!
      Hope that helps!

    • @user-kv2qv9bd4f
      @user-kv2qv9bd4f 2 роки тому +1

      Thank you, this is very helpful 😊.

    • @jace8734
      @jace8734 Рік тому

      If you still need them i can email you some materials from my school you can use as topic tests

  • @shamela1683
    @shamela1683 7 місяців тому

    Hello sir, at 14:07 what would you consider then if denominator was the derivative of numerator?

    • @BicenMaths
      @BicenMaths  7 місяців тому

      Wouldn't work with reverse chain rule - only works if numerator is derivative of denominator!

  • @ehehrrhr
    @ehehrrhr Рік тому

    hi sir, on the very first slide in this powerpoint on the first question how come in our answer there was no x at the front like there was in the integral given?

    • @BicenMaths
      @BicenMaths  Рік тому

      If there was an x, when you would differentiate it, you'd need the product rule, so it wouldn't return to the integral in the question. The extra x appears from the chain rule when differentiating the expression we get as the answer!

    • @ehehrrhr
      @ehehrrhr Рік тому

      @@BicenMaths so the integral sign is almost like saying dy/dx = whatever is in the integral then finding the y equation that differentiates back to the integral

    • @BicenMaths
      @BicenMaths  Рік тому

      @@ehehrrhr That's exactly it! I tell my students how integration used to be called anti-differentiation. And that's how you should think of it, it'll really help with your understanding!

  • @nandoboiii5215
    @nandoboiii5215 3 місяці тому

    Seb I was doing this and 11.3 recently in class (we use the same slides that u used) and I'm really finding it tough

    • @nandoboiii5215
      @nandoboiii5215 3 місяці тому

      nvm I'm getting reverse chain rule now, 11.3 and 9.6 still tough

    • @BicenMaths
      @BicenMaths  3 місяці тому

      They're hard! Let me know if you have any questions, happy to help!

  • @farhanashfaque5295
    @farhanashfaque5295 Рік тому

    Hi sir really quick question how would you know when to use reverse chain rule or when you can just standard formula method in order to integrate thanks

    • @BicenMaths
      @BicenMaths  Рік тому +2

      Actually not that simple a question! But I answer it in detail here ua-cam.com/video/L6UkjiDVmWk/v-deo.html

  • @pankaja7974
    @pankaja7974 2 роки тому +1

    At 10:05 you can call it the derivatand ?

    • @BicenMaths
      @BicenMaths  2 роки тому

      I’ve not heard this used before, so I wouldn’t use it personally!

    • @pankaja7974
      @pankaja7974 2 роки тому

      @@BicenMaths i know. With your dedication to maths, you have earned the privilege to coin a word for that 👍

  • @MaryTaiwo-k4q
    @MaryTaiwo-k4q 8 місяців тому

    What is the best way to learn how to 'consider'

    • @BicenMaths
      @BicenMaths  8 місяців тому

      Spend time getting really good at differentiation - the chain rule, particularly! Try and know what all functions differentiate to - that'll help you think about what has been differentiated to give you the thing we want to integrate

  • @ness8007
    @ness8007 2 роки тому +1

    sir, why did the bracket rise to the power of 4 at 3:13

    • @BicenMaths
      @BicenMaths  2 роки тому +1

      Because we’re trying to integrate something to the power of 3, and this usually goes to something to the power of 4, right? So it’s the same idea for the reverse chain rule here. Hope that helps.

    • @ness8007
      @ness8007 2 роки тому

      @@BicenMaths thankss sir, I've learned a lot from your helpful videos

  • @rkchitra
    @rkchitra 8 місяців тому

    Hi sir at 7:19 why do we consider it to be sin^3 x

    • @BicenMaths
      @BicenMaths  8 місяців тому

      Because we know that (sinx)^3 would go to 3(sinx)^2 cosx using the chain rule, which looks pretty similar to what we are trying to integrate! You have to really be good at the chain rule to spot these things!

  • @kuba2466
    @kuba2466 Рік тому

    great video seb

  • @mlfacts7973
    @mlfacts7973 3 роки тому +1

    very helpful , thanks

  • @mrmini4567
    @mrmini4567 Рік тому +1

    Life saver...

  • @jkn2080
    @jkn2080 Рік тому

    U ARE SAVING MA LIFE

  • @wakib7066
    @wakib7066 Рік тому

    bicen too good