That’s a great question. For a long time, the general rule of thumb was that only eukaryotes had histone proteins. There were a small number of archaea and bacteria with some “histone-like proteins” that were only somewhat similar. But recently, more evidence for histones in prokaryotes has been coming out, like this paper published about 9 months after I posted this video: academic.oup.com/bioinformatics/article/35/14/2349/5232221
Hours of frustration with my textbook content and UA-cam videos and at last I found this video which has helped a lot, thanks.
I’m glad! Good luck studying.
🎉
Thank you so much for this! This was extremely simplified and streamlined!
I’m glad it is what you needed. ✅
Thank you. This was so easy to understand !!!
Thanks for watching :)
This is so helpful
Pretty good 💖 really I appreciate it.
Your explanations and voice is much more clear👏👏
Thank you 💐
Great summary!
thank you so much. this is so helpful. fighting ❤️ from Mongolia
Fighting
I wish it also on a pdf form because of course requirements in the study of microbiology students.
Dont Archeae have histones, and theyre prokaryotic?
That’s a great question. For a long time, the general rule of thumb was that only eukaryotes had histone proteins. There were a small number of archaea and bacteria with some “histone-like proteins” that were only somewhat similar. But recently, more evidence for histones in prokaryotes has been coming out, like this paper published about 9 months after I posted this video: academic.oup.com/bioinformatics/article/35/14/2349/5232221
@@BiologyProfessor thanks so much! Really interesting!