Sidenote. I would LOVE a Dan McClellan tshirt or sweater/hoodie with "Nah, I'm good" on it. Or is there already those and I'm blind? I love Dans videos! 👍😎
That would require an entirely different society to receive such a message. There's truth our society isn't ready for, conceptually or otherwise. God willing, we'll be just as embarrassed about it as we are about slavery when it's revealed.
@@Hingusbingus4 Maybe you're ready, but probably not. The message will be heard when we've got the ears to hear it, is what I've come to understand. There were so many dimensions of human morality that we just aren't ready as a people to comprehend, let alone put into practice. Humanity is always changing, moving hopefully towards the good; but God can only speak to us in the language we understand. We're not even doing on a civilizational level the things we already know to be right, so I'm not hopeful we'll get that message any time soon either. Regardless, in the meantime we should try putting into practice the things that are clearly known to be moral, and see if we can't become the type of civilization capable of accepting more than we've already been given.
So a woman was the first to see and talk to Satan, the first to see and talk to god, and the first to see and talk to the resurrected Jesus. That’s interesting.
@@johnburn8031 That kinda depends on your conception of the whole Adam/Eve dichotomy. Modern interpretations have it as Adam and Eve being wholly separate beings. But there have been interpretations going way back of Adam and Eve being a single entity which was then split by Bible god. Dan has talked previously about how the word being used there is not "rib" but "side", meaning effectively the other side of the body. So in a sense, yes. But also in a sense no, as Eve was there too.
@@rainbowkrampusI mean the point of that event is that the woman came from the man, there is some kind of wordplay with the hebrew words here and I believe there is a passage that explicitly mentions something along the lines of "for women came from men, and not the other way around", with the context attempting to justify a male superiority. So I don't buy this "they were a single entity thing". A part of Adam became Eve through YHWH's intervention. Not only that, she was created with the specific intention of being a companion to Adam (in one of the creation accounts, of course) This is my opinion.
@@johnburn8031 Genesis never specifically says that Adam saw God. Adam is the first to speak to God when he said, "I heard you in the garden..." I have always considered the commandment in Genesis 2:16 to be face to face, but if you want to be pedantic about it, the book doesn't say that. I really don't think the group of pre-Yahwist Shaman's putting this together on their way to the Levant from Mesopotamia were all that concerned or even sophisticated enough to realize that these differences exist; but you know, we need some reason to kill each other.
I'm not certain about Hagar; although who knows how deep the curators were willing to go. Your other two examples are certainly deliberate; however. Chaos creating the chaos of woman who presents the order of man is a reoccurring theme.
Despite all the financial struggles I and my family faced, everything is finally falling into place! $45,700 weekly gain and riches I'll will always praise the Lord!!!!!
How can one start, most time people don't know where to start when it comes to crypto. But it would be great if you can provide proper guidance on steps to follow please....
Same,I met Kate Elizabeth Becherer last for the first time at the conference in Manchester, after then my family change for the best, God bless Kate Elizabeth Becherer
Don't sell your Bitcoin or Altcoins because is not a smart move. You should take some quality of what you hold and get an expert to educate you on day trading...
I have such a delight pleasure, that you Dan told about your own book through this vid. Spreadung the real knowledge about the scripture is very good to do!
I said the same thing it's suspect and satanic it shows he cares more about views and money than representing the kingdom of god I actually stopped following his channel after this because the devil put it in his mind to promote hellboy while laughing right In his and his followers faces ..he will make excuses why is does it but to god there is no excuse corinthians 10:21..You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons. You cannot partake of the table of the Lord and the table of demons..... Philippians 4:8.. Finally, brothers, whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is just, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is commendable, if there is any excellence, if there is anything worthy of praise, think about these things.
I thought Adam and Eve would be the first. The God was literally looking for them after the eating incident. Presumably, the great God must have found them. The garden can’t be that big 😊
Gen 22.11-12. With the binding of Isaac, the 'angel' countermands what God told Abraham directly, and says "you didn't withold your son from Me". It would seem to make more sense if this was God talking originally
Greetings, this message is sent in love. Plenty of people have seen God in the scriptures. How close? Not too close, no descriptions of his face, but definitely detailed descriptions. your friend
I can think of at least three ways to define "first." First in order of scholarly estimated date of authorship, first left-to-right in traditional ordering of a given canon's sequence of books, or first in terms of a univocally presupposed ordering of the historical events. However, even the first definition presupposes a canon.
That makes more sense. I thought someone was claiming to know who first said they saw God in the real world, and I thought we were going to get references to some Cro Magnon cave paintings! 😆
When do you believe this Malak editing was done? Do we have evidence of passages written with and without the Angel term, or was this believed editing before any of our current known copies?
I first discovered the original story of Hagar throughout the conferences of professor Thomas Römer in College de France. It's fascinating and passionate. Scholars also discovered that Hagar is also the ancestor of Hagarites a proto-arabic tribe in the Levant. In fact The Bible tells stories of peoples and nations through fictional characters who represent them. These are called foundation stories. Consequently, the Bible explains how the proto-Arab tribes were the first to worship the god Yahweh.
What textual criticism commentary would you recommend. I was looking in Amazon it gave me a large selection to choose from… is Amy Anderson’s any better than F.C. Conybeare because of 100 years of research between these scholars that rendered the latter one obsolete? Please illuminate us on which scholars work best represents the academic consensus…
I feel like your videos when you stand on your own are much stronger than when you respond to others on like TikTok. (Probably cuz it’s very hard to deal with TikTok “scholars”)
Someone please explain what he meant when he said; “Nothing in the text indicates that what you’re arguing is that nothing prevents me from reading this into any prophecy where they add the explicit rhetorical flourish that this is irrevocable.” How would the text say what his argument about the text is? Or what did he mean instead of that when he said it? Also, what is “this” when saying, “…prevents from reading this into…” & “…that this is irrevocable…”? Is the 1st “this” meant to be “motivations”?
Wait a minute. Is there a period after “nothing in the text indicates that”? Then, it makes “more sense”; though I still don’t know what “this” is. Maybe the 2nd “this” is “the dogma”?
The Bible says that they walked and talked with God, but they never explicitly claim to have seen God. We assume that is a part of walking and talking with Him, but that's not the Bible telling us so.
Gen 1-11 is myth and etiology or etiological. So besides the fact that the text does not explicitely say so in the same way as the occurences Dan refers to, it is outside the purvue of after the fall and expulsion from the garden. Also later in Gen 5, Enoch walked with God and God took him. So these examples do not really match what Dan is pointing to.
Dan specified that he was referring to the first person in the Bible who claims to have seen God, not the first person the bible claims to have seen God. A subtle, but important difference that leads to the answer he gives.
Hi dan can you pls assist with clarify Jeremiah 22:30 as Jehoiachin is set not to have his descendant rulling from the house of David but in Mathew 1 vs 11 he turns out to be Jesus grand father or is Jesus the mesiah concert crushed at all or is truly liars
Why would Yahweh need angels 👼 as servants? Couldn't he do anything he needs to do far more efficiently and effectively than having servants do it for him? Seems like a very lazy deity to me. 🤷🏻♂️
If looking upon him would destroy a mortal, then sending angels makes sense. Preserve their lives. Even if that's not literally the case, it could still be taken as a metaphor for appropriateness. Some things would be inappropriate for God to do, so he sends angels to do those things instead, or to prepare the way so he can do those things without impropriety.
Lol ask all ancient peoples from the ancient near east or south west asia. They had all these concepts in their texts and inscriptions. They perceived deities to be like royal houses or courts with servants and levels or tiers. The Hebrew Bible follows these concepts and modifies some details here and there and there is development throughout the texts as they circulated before the final canonical forms.
@@BradyPostma Quick question why would looking upon him destroy a mortal? If God is omnipotent couldn't he just say "Naw, it's OK, I'm gonna decide that humans CAN look upon me and live"? Also how do you even apply "appropriate" to an all-powerful God. It amazes me how the answers to so many questions regarding the omnipotent God are to say "Well of course he can't do that, he's got limits ya know!"
So my question is: were there always angels in this pantheon or were they a borrowed entity used to address the desire to have Bible god melt your face? Like, we know of other angel like beings from nearby cultures. Were ancient Israelites borrowing those the whole time or are all of these angels post hoc creations derived from instances of Bible god and possibly other gods interacting with people?
This is something of a conflation. The bible depends on source documents that make up part of the body of work, but is not beholden to them. The bible is not just compilation, it's a single work telling a single story. The source documents have been edited accordingly to reflect the larger story being told. This is the duty of the community who transmits the bible, and thus the stories. If there was some long-lost source where Hagar sees God and not an angel, we simply don't have it in the bible. In that case, Hagar's not the first person to see God in the bible which is the finished product of the community charged with keeping the holy bible.
@@TheZinmo Islam is true because it complies with the faith of the prophets. All the prophets of God taught *PURE MONOTHEISM* no prophet taught monotheism through theories of Polytheism.
GLORY!!!'m favoured, $140K every 3weeks! And I am retired i can now give back to the locals in my community and also support God's work and the church. God bless America 🇺🇸 ❤️
I raised 75k and Kate Elizabeth Becherer is to be thanked. I got myself my dream car 🚗 just last weekend, My journey with her started after my best friend came back from New York and saw me suffering in dept then told me about her and how to change my life through her.Kate Elizabeth Becherer is the kind of person one needs in his or her life! I got a home, a good wife, and a beautiful daughter. Note: this is not a promotion but me trying to make a point that no matter what happens, always have faith and keep living!
Hagar was also the second person to be lead singer of Van Halen
And that Hagar was also cast out.
And the title character of a comic strip about viking raiders. I hear he was horrible at that.
god was playing lead guitar
And God's brother was on bass.
@@johnkesler8553 yes because we all know that Van Halen is David Lee Roth 😊
Sidenote. I would LOVE a Dan McClellan tshirt or sweater/hoodie with "Nah, I'm good" on it. Or is there already those and I'm blind? I love Dans videos! 👍😎
Imagine if God went "Poof, you are no longer a slave" instead of telling her to not be disobedient to her owners.
That would require God to be a moral being
That would require an entirely different society to receive such a message. There's truth our society isn't ready for, conceptually or otherwise. God willing, we'll be just as embarrassed about it as we are about slavery when it's revealed.
@@micah3209 you're not ready lol. I'm more than ready but ik that message isn't coming
@@Hingusbingus4 Maybe you're ready, but probably not. The message will be heard when we've got the ears to hear it, is what I've come to understand. There were so many dimensions of human morality that we just aren't ready as a people to comprehend, let alone put into practice. Humanity is always changing, moving hopefully towards the good; but God can only speak to us in the language we understand. We're not even doing on a civilizational level the things we already know to be right, so I'm not hopeful we'll get that message any time soon either. Regardless, in the meantime we should try putting into practice the things that are clearly known to be moral, and see if we can't become the type of civilization capable of accepting more than we've already been given.
@micah3209 And that message would be what exactly? Give us a clue, O Mighty Future-guesser
So a woman was the first to see and talk to Satan, the first to see and talk to god, and the first to see and talk to the resurrected Jesus.
That’s interesting.
Whilst I wish that was the case, wouldn't Adam have been the first person to see and talk to God?
@@johnburn8031 That kinda depends on your conception of the whole Adam/Eve dichotomy.
Modern interpretations have it as Adam and Eve being wholly separate beings. But there have been interpretations going way back of Adam and Eve being a single entity which was then split by Bible god. Dan has talked previously about how the word being used there is not "rib" but "side", meaning effectively the other side of the body.
So in a sense, yes. But also in a sense no, as Eve was there too.
@@rainbowkrampusI mean the point of that event is that the woman came from the man, there is some kind of wordplay with the hebrew words here and I believe there is a passage that explicitly mentions something along the lines of "for women came from men, and not the other way around", with the context attempting to justify a male superiority.
So I don't buy this "they were a single entity thing". A part of Adam became Eve through YHWH's intervention. Not only that, she was created with the specific intention of being a companion to Adam (in one of the creation accounts, of course)
This is my opinion.
@@johnburn8031 Genesis never specifically says that Adam saw God. Adam is the first to speak to God when he said, "I heard you in the garden..." I have always considered the commandment in Genesis 2:16 to be face to face, but if you want to be pedantic about it, the book doesn't say that.
I really don't think the group of pre-Yahwist Shaman's putting this together on their way to the Levant from Mesopotamia were all that concerned or even sophisticated enough to realize that these differences exist; but you know, we need some reason to kill each other.
I'm not certain about Hagar; although who knows how deep the curators were willing to go.
Your other two examples are certainly deliberate; however. Chaos creating the chaos of woman who presents the order of man is a reoccurring theme.
The apologist: buy my book and read it!
The scholar: read my book, download it free!
❤❤❤❤❤❤ thanks Dan!!!
Despite all the financial struggles I and my family faced, everything is finally falling into place! $45,700 weekly gain and riches I'll will always praise the Lord!!!!!
How can one start, most time people don't know where to start when it comes to crypto. But it would be great if you can provide proper guidance on steps to follow please....
It doesn't matter if you are a current holder or a newbie, you can capitalise on the fluctuation of Bitcoin by trading with good signal / strategy..
It's essential for you to have a good mentor to keep you accountable. I'm guided by a widely known crypto consultant...
Same,I met Kate Elizabeth Becherer last for the first time at the conference in Manchester, after then my family change for the best, God bless Kate Elizabeth Becherer
Don't sell your Bitcoin or Altcoins because is not a smart move. You should take some quality of what you hold and get an expert to educate you on day trading...
I have such a delight pleasure, that you Dan told about your own book through this vid. Spreadung the real knowledge about the scripture is very good to do!
Who is the shortest person in the Bible? Knee-high-miah (Nehemiah)
I'll get my coat...
Peter slept on his watch, so probably much shorter.
I like that you're talking about seeing yahweh while wearing Hellboy
I said the same thing it's suspect and satanic it shows he cares more about views and money than representing the kingdom of god I actually stopped following his channel after this because the devil put it in his mind to promote hellboy while laughing right In his and his followers faces ..he will make excuses why is does it but to god there is no excuse corinthians 10:21..You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons. You cannot partake of the table of the Lord and the table of demons..... Philippians 4:8..
Finally, brothers, whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is just, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is commendable, if there is any excellence, if there is anything worthy of praise, think about these things.
I thought Adam and Eve would be the first. The God was literally looking for them after the eating incident. Presumably, the great God must have found them. The garden can’t be that big 😊
I guess it depends on if the narrative says/implies they say God vs if the narrative has them saying they saw God.
To understand ancient ignorant superstitious people feeble imaginery illusions,you also need to be brainwashed into feeble imaginery illusions.
Gen 22.11-12. With the binding of Isaac, the 'angel' countermands what God told Abraham directly, and says "you didn't withold your son from Me".
It would seem to make more sense if this was God talking originally
Greetings, this message is sent in love. Plenty of people have seen God in the scriptures. How close? Not too close, no descriptions of his face, but definitely detailed descriptions. your friend
I can think of at least three ways to define "first." First in order of scholarly estimated date of authorship, first left-to-right in traditional ordering of a given canon's sequence of books, or first in terms of a univocally presupposed ordering of the historical events. However, even the first definition presupposes a canon.
Enoch walked with God, Adam and Eve talked with God, Cain talked with God,
Thanks Dan!
Sargon saw Annu long before these stories. The Hebrew God is simply an evolution of Ancient Sumerian Gods.
Just seeing God aged Charlton Heston years. Don't believe me? Look at him when he comes down from Mt. Sinai...
That makes more sense. I thought someone was claiming to know who first said they saw God in the real world, and I thought we were going to get references to some Cro Magnon cave paintings! 😆
I saw god once. I was tripping acid ballz at the time though, so I wouldn't put too much stock into the claim.
Just as valid. Did she tell you anything?
@@oltedders no, i got a fright and grounded myself.
@@tussk.
Bummer!
This guy is the worst Scholar I have ever heard.
So the first time God actually appears
they are acting as a slave-catcher ?
Hmmmm.....
What about Steven’s claim that God appeared to Abraham in Mesopotamia, before he was in Harlan?
When do you believe this Malak editing was done? Do we have evidence of passages written with and without the Angel term, or was this believed editing before any of our current known copies?
I know samaritan torah is quite consistent with Angel term， always have
I first discovered the original story of Hagar throughout the conferences of professor Thomas Römer in College de France. It's fascinating and passionate.
Scholars also discovered that Hagar is also the ancestor of Hagarites a proto-arabic tribe in the Levant.
In fact The Bible tells stories of peoples and nations through fictional characters who represent them. These are called foundation stories.
Consequently, the Bible explains how the proto-Arab tribes were the first to worship the god Yahweh.
Great video, Dan! You have any literature tied to this problem, particularly in the differences between textual traditions? Thanks.
lol nvm as soon as I unpaused the video you showed your book
It’s covered also in ‘The Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible’.
*Yahweh honors slavery* 😡
Genesis 16:8 “Hagar, slave of Sarai…”
Hagar can't drive 55, which provides more data that they had a god encounter.
Acid.
What textual criticism commentary would you recommend. I was looking in Amazon it gave me a large selection to choose from… is Amy Anderson’s any better than F.C. Conybeare because of 100 years of research between these scholars that rendered the latter one obsolete? Please illuminate us on which scholars work best represents the academic consensus…
Interesting.
Not Adam or Eve? Didn't God walk through the Garden?
Hagar
Given Abe's supposed age I'm pretty sure Hagar was his nurse.
Sigh....okay. there's no way to show the editor added malakh.
I feel like your videos when you stand on your own are much stronger than when you respond to others on like TikTok. (Probably cuz it’s very hard to deal with TikTok “scholars”)
What's going on with this Kate Elizabeth Becherer christian crypto spam in the comments? Fascinating...
Have you ever talked about the mark of the beast ?
The Christian cult?
Try looking it up, i know he has.
Good point, but Adam, Eve and Cain chatted with God regularly.
But there are no Hebrew manuscripts that can show the original version where the word was added right?
He talks about this in maklelan1711 Why do angles say "do not fear"
t shirts are clever
Hagar was Horrible!
Someone please explain what he meant when he said; “Nothing in the text indicates that what you’re arguing is that nothing prevents me from reading this into any prophecy where they add the explicit rhetorical flourish that this is irrevocable.”
How would the text say what his argument about the text is? Or what did he mean instead of that when he said it?
Also, what is “this” when saying, “…prevents from reading this into…” & “…that this is irrevocable…”? Is the 1st “this” meant to be “motivations”?
Wait a minute. Is there a period after “nothing in the text indicates that”? Then, it makes “more sense”; though I still don’t know what “this” is. Maybe the 2nd “this” is “the dogma”?
I thought no one can see god
That was a later theological concept.
Technically, all Hellboy are Mignola Hellboy.
Uh Dan? Adam and Eve?
The Bible says that they walked and talked with God, but they never explicitly claim to have seen God. We assume that is a part of walking and talking with Him, but that's not the Bible telling us so.
Gen 1-11 is myth and etiology or etiological. So besides the fact that the text does not explicitely say so in the same way as the occurences Dan refers to, it is outside the purvue of after the fall and expulsion from the garden. Also later in Gen 5, Enoch walked with God and God took him. So these examples do not really match what Dan is pointing to.
Dan specified that he was referring to the first person in the Bible who claims to have seen God, not the first person the bible claims to have seen God. A subtle, but important difference that leads to the answer he gives.
@@AMcAFaves That, too. True.
Hi dan can you pls assist with clarify Jeremiah 22:30 as Jehoiachin is set not to have his descendant rulling from the house of David but in Mathew 1 vs 11 he turns out to be Jesus grand father or is Jesus the mesiah concert crushed at all or is truly liars
??? But in Genesis 3, God is walking in the Garden and talking to Adam and Eve. Surely, they see God then...?
But they didn't claim to see/have seen him
Adam was the first person to see and talk with God.
Hager was also horrible……according to Andy Capp
Always drinking and carousing. But with a nagging wife, who could blame him/her?
Hagar doesn’t have a nagging wife. Helga is a home boss. The Wizard of Id has a nagging wife. Don’t get Helga mixed up with Blanche.
Technically, Adam was the first person to see God, he walked with God in the Garden.
Since crypto&stocks worldwide, it is sure to be available world-wide!!!!
I thought it was Adam. But i am not a scholar.
Adam may have been first to see god, but he made no claim to seeing god.
Stone age stoner
Hagar was an allegory, and so was Abraham and Sarah. The Bible is a collection of allegories
Not all of it. There is also historical content in the bible.
...how do you know?
It's allegorical or symbolic when you want it to be and literal when you want it to be 🤷🏻♂️
@@Nickesponja Galatians 4:21-26.
@@exploremore2438 it’s all allegories 100%
No one? because no one has seen god at any time
@-gearsgarage- I think that's why he was careful to phrase it as "first person to *claim* to see God".
a) he said CLAIM to see god.
b) Exodus 24: 9-10
Unfortunately psychiatric records don't go back that far.
The jews did alot of muddling because alot of the old testement points to jesus
Glad you said, "claimed to see god". Sky daddy is just something we created to explain things before we developed science.
Sky daddy was never real.
Dude! Its clear, you are no scholar of the Bible.
Why would Yahweh need angels 👼 as servants?
Couldn't he do anything he needs to do far more efficiently and effectively than having servants do it for him?
Seems like a very lazy deity to me. 🤷🏻♂️
If looking upon him would destroy a mortal, then sending angels makes sense. Preserve their lives.
Even if that's not literally the case, it could still be taken as a metaphor for appropriateness. Some things would be inappropriate for God to do, so he sends angels to do those things instead, or to prepare the way so he can do those things without impropriety.
Organizations and Hierarchial structure nothing bad about that.
Lol ask all ancient peoples from the ancient near east or south west asia. They had all these concepts in their texts and inscriptions. They perceived deities to be like royal houses or courts with servants and levels or tiers. The Hebrew Bible follows these concepts and modifies some details here and there and there is development throughout the texts as they circulated before the final canonical forms.
@@BradyPostma Quick question why would looking upon him destroy a mortal? If God is omnipotent couldn't he just say "Naw, it's OK, I'm gonna decide that humans CAN look upon me and live"? Also how do you even apply "appropriate" to an all-powerful God.
It amazes me how the answers to so many questions regarding the omnipotent God are to say "Well of course he can't do that, he's got limits ya know!"
@@NymazMaybe God is just really really shy.
So my question is: were there always angels in this pantheon or were they a borrowed entity used to address the desire to have Bible god melt your face?
Like, we know of other angel like beings from nearby cultures. Were ancient Israelites borrowing those the whole time or are all of these angels post hoc creations derived from instances of Bible god and possibly other gods interacting with people?
@@rainbowkrampus I mean the Serpent in Genesis Tradition seems to match with depictions of Seraphs from pre-exilic Israel.
first
Here's a virtual cookie 🍪 and a virtual glass of milk 🍶 😁😉
@monwear1 Or just the first to claim that you're first. In the spirit of scepticism we'll need further proof.
@@sierrabianca ironically, I can vouch that they were indeed the first comment.
@@johnburn8031 Appreciate it but eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable ;)
This is something of a conflation. The bible depends on source documents that make up part of the body of work, but is not beholden to them. The bible is not just compilation, it's a single work telling a single story. The source documents have been edited accordingly to reflect the larger story being told. This is the duty of the community who transmits the bible, and thus the stories. If there was some long-lost source where Hagar sees God and not an angel, we simply don't have it in the bible. In that case, Hagar's not the first person to see God in the bible which is the finished product of the community charged with keeping the holy bible.
Hagar the mother of Prophet Ismail?
Yes, that Hagar. So Islam is true?!
Lol. Ismael was blessed but hes not the One.
@@Jaymastia Ismael is not the one? The Bible said the ignored cornerstone will become the main stone. Who is this person?
@@TheZinmo Islam is true because it complies with the faith of the prophets. All the prophets of God taught *PURE MONOTHEISM* no prophet taught monotheism through theories of Polytheism.
@@sinan_islam That's Jesus Christ, and Ismael wasn't rejected.
GLORY!!!'m favoured, $140K every 3weeks! And I am retired i can now give back to the locals in my community and also support God's work and the church. God bless America 🇺🇸 ❤️
I'm inspired.
Please spill some sugar about the biweekly stuff you mentioned
I raised 75k and Kate Elizabeth Becherer is to be thanked. I got myself my dream car 🚗 just last weekend, My journey with her started after my best friend came back from New York and saw me suffering in dept then told me about her and how to change my life through her.Kate Elizabeth Becherer is the kind of person one needs in his or her life! I got a home, a good wife, and a beautiful daughter. Note: this is not a promotion but me trying to make a point that no matter what happens, always have faith and keep living!
This is a definition of God's unending provisions for his people. God remains faithful to his words. 🙏 I received this for my household
Wow 😱 I know her too
Miss Kate Elizabeth Becherer is a remarkable individual who has brought immense positivity and inspiration into my life.
I started with a miserly $1500. The results have been mind blowing I must say TBH
No one has seen god, not even adam, and 3ve.