Thanks for making this video! I really love how the 85 renders. I have the 58 but it is definitely a specialty lens and isn't as versatile as I wish it would be
Really good video. As much as I was trying to evaluate with all things taken into consideration, the darkness of the 105mm shots made it hard to favor it. I do love the larger bokeh, but I have to agree with other poster who said the 105mm shots looked flat. Between the 85 & 58... I really liked them both, and went back & forth on the 2 lenses. Perhaps a cool next video would be comparing all the photos after you've PP'd them & get them looking their best? Cheers on the great video!
Yeah thats a good idea, I usually just compare the RAWs, and show the edited pics during the video. Yeah? I dont know why the 105 1.4E shots look darker, all was the same auto ISO, aperture wide open, settings? AWB too, metering was matrix for all lenses as well, kinda weird. I even updated the Nikon Df to the latest firmware and latest distortion data for August 2016.
I liked all the 85 shots more. Might be the better exposure. I rented the 105 1.4 and it was sharp (shockingly sharp!) but I also noticed some underexposure - I think it has poor light transmission due to so many elements. Looking to upgrade my 105 F2 DC. Think I will keep it around but add the 85mm.
The video is instructive but this is reason why you don’t shoot video in AF on a camera. The camera for video one should manually focus, is more artistic and fancier.
Guam Photography Hi aren't you noticing that the subject is distorted(wide) on 105 compared to the 85 where the model "shay" on 85mm looks more slimmer I don't know why but it's what I noticed, did any one notice the same.
Really nice video.I personally prefer the 85mm as length...If i go for more than 100mm i'll go to 135mm or 200mm...Now for outdoor shooting the speedlight produce like 0 light...Around 75w i think is the output,if you use a strobe over 500w than it doesn matter what lens you use,even a 50mm 1.8g could be awesome !
mate, despite the compression and sharpness, the 105 f1.4 produced flat images. the 85 did much better. you could look at the 105 f2 dc. i am confident you will like the results it produces.
I used to have the 180mm 2.8 , loved that lens as well, I tried out the 105 F2, and 135 F2, awhile back , need to get my hands on one again to try out :) I do want to get away from the AF-D nikons, too much CA at times and slight haze, but then again if you always post process your images like I do, it shouldn't matter, thanks for the comment :)
The compression and the "flatness" are the same thing. That's exactly what some people love about shooting 105mm at f/1.4. If you don't like it, you can stop down, or use a wider focal length.
Of course the 3d pop increases as you go to a wider lens. There's even more 3d pop with a 20mm or a 15mm fisheye, and everything looks flatter and flatter as you go more telephoto. That's the nature of optics.
Lol I am STILL undecided which lens....85, 105 or 135. Oh and whether she is a model or not she is gorgeous. Like to see more of her if you can manage it.
9:13 Could it really be motion blur? It says 1/1250s! Also, at 9:45 you say the 105 and 58 are shooting darker than the 85. Well, the 85 is 1/1250s and the 105 and 58 are 1/1600s. Other settings remain the same.
85mm give the more natural look, skin tone, color and face is better looking than on 105mm (give much wider face - and compression is too high)... My choice will be 85mm :) ....
I would choose the Nikon D750, just for the battery life, and they way it feels in my hands, I really don't like the SONY A7 series, battery life was very terrible for me :(
I have the Sigma ART 135mm f/1.8, fantastic bokeh, my only lens that is not a Nikon (and I have many lenses) because Nikon does not offer a good 135mm.
Great video but I think you should have shot with the same settings for every set, I noticed with the 105 you consistently shot at a higher shutter speed resulting in a darker image which it look more flat than it should be in comparison to the 85mm. If you run into this on accident however Lightroom has a feature to match the exposure between a selected set of frames, comes in super hand when I'm doing engagement shoots and sometimes accidentally adjust the shutter and end up with a couple darker/brighter images.
Right on. 105 DC is the best lens in Nikon's line up. Additional sharpness is not that important in a lens. It about the quality of rendition. The new 105 is a turd lens
This is taken from DP Reivew: "The 58mm focal length may look like an odd choice, but it's deliberately evocative of a legendary Nikon lens - the manual focus Noct-Nikkor 58mm f/1.2 from the late 1970s. Indeed Nikon's marketing material draws a parallel between them, saying the new 58mm's 'design concept' pays homage to the old 'Noct'. Stripped of its marketing-speak, this translates to a lens design which goes to extremes to minimize peripheral aberrations such as coma at large apertures, while also paying specific attention to the rendition of out-of-focus regions of the frame, or 'bokeh'." www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikon-58mm-f1-4g
The 105 F2 DC is a better portrait lens than any of those. It's not quite as sharp, but guess what? Extreme sharpness is undesirable in a portrait lens. Unless you like looking at skin pores, makeup edges, pimples, etc...women in particular hate to see all that stuff.
Yes thats true, we have gotten away from understanding that for a portrait lens, sharpness isn't that critical, but some do want to see a 3D pop, from a super sharp subject with a blurry background. I too don't care so much if the lens isn't as sharp, since I'm mostly a portrait shooter.
I'm indecisive. I have a 135mm 18 that is sharp, but I thought the 105mm 1.4 may be more convenient and I love a sharp lenses. My old 85 1.8 isn't as sharp anymore so I've been thinking about the 85mm 1.4. I tend to use the 85 and 35 the whole wedding. My sharp 135 is so long so, I barely use it, but I still wanna keep it because it's sharp. I'm thinking I'd use the 105 more because it isn't as far and it sounds like I could trust it during a ceremony.
Some people call the Nikon 105mm 1.4E a baby 200 f/2, since the bokeh is just so nice!! If your hardly using the 135 1.8 and its too long for you, I would get the Nikon 105 1.4E one of my favorite lenses, its very sharp!
@@GuamPhotography It's not a baby 200 F/2. It's not even in the same ballpark. It's the Ferrari of images. The 105 is a slightly longer 85mm. I shoot with a 35mm/85mm 1.4G, and a 200 F/2. Only three lenses you need. Better off with a used 200 F/2 than a 105mm 1.4.
The video was full of amateurish focus hunting, making it almost impossible to watch. Why don't you folks set the video in manual(fixed) focusing, since most of the time you we were in fixed position. The review is otherwise good!
You’re fulla crap saying it was almost impossible to watch the video. Comments like this and the people that make them are so toxic to the comment section.
I recently rented the 58/1.4 and 105/1.4E and comparing them to my 85/1.4g I came to the exact same conclusion as you. (The 58/1.4 producing interesting images, but it needed a +18 AF tuning which really put me off). Great review!
Awesome job guys, but, it is AMAZING how much the GX8 looses focus while you do your video. Next time you should definitely not rely on it's auto-focus and just use manual focus. Thanks!
Hopefully you are not just friends with model guys but 105 has just so shallow dof so not sure it really matters its 1.4. Some of the comments below said maybe 105 2 DC performs maybe even better you have to test it out not only the question of price but overall worth it or not
can I have a comparison with the 85 and the 105 at the closest focus (head shot) in order to compare compression/distortion of the face cause I do a lot head shot and I want to know if the 105mm would be better than my 85mm. thank you in advance!
Das Nikon 105 mm 1.4C ist an einer D3x der Hammer zeichnen mit Licht.... das Nikon 85 mm 1.4G ist an einer Nikon D6 besser als das 105 mm 1 4G das 58 ist an allen Kameras Top! Würde das 85 1.4G und das 105 mm 1.4E den Nikon 58 mm 1 4G vorziehen alle drei sind Optiken auf höchsten Niveau.
Hi @GuamPhotography would like to know how does this lens stops down as my copy stops down like f1.4 then f1.7...f2.0...f2.4...f2.8.. is it like this on your copy too as mine copy doesn't stops at 1.6 & 1.8 ?? it's a bit wiered.
My three portraits lenses with my two Nikon D4 and the Nikon F5. Shoot the most the 105mm than the 85mm and rarely the 135mm. Nikon AF 85mm f/1.4D IF Nikon AF DC 105mm f/2D Nikon AF DC 135mm f/2D
I have AF fine set to +20 on all my 3 D750's, and with that I can not be sure about focus accuracy, BUT still I am getting more accurate shots then 85mm provided. My 85mm was checked in factory, and it was good, friends 85mm also do lots of inaccurate shots. But if we are comparing them, 135mm gives softer image in a good way, I really enjoy feel of image , specially with portraits in good light (shade, chromatic aberration is terrible). of course, it's not that sharp as 85mm @f2. And if I compare it against 70-200 VR2 2.8, at close distance 135mm gives more magnification, compression, 70-200 have focal breathing problem. And 135mm have nicer bokeh, nicer colors, but softer look. 85mm, 70-200mm I am using for anything, landscapes, portraits, night, day .. but 135mm for me is strictly for portraits, and if model have some skin problem or wrinkles this is THE tool to use. :) But probably I should get it to warranty check, AF fine tune+20 isn't normal and I get out of focus shots quite a lot. In the end I would say it's extra lens. surly you can live without it. I dont know how long I will live without 85mm f1.4, but this time Sigma Art, if it is any good.
Thanks a lot for your response. I think I have to rent a 135mm f/2 DC lens and see for myself because some people rave about it as THE ultimate portrait lens in Nikon world while some say it is too soft, chromatic aberration is bad, focus is difficult. I understand that this is a difficult lens to use but I hope those who have mastered it are praising it to the sky. If it is truly the king of portrait lenses then I think I should work hard to learn to use it. Shall start with a rented lens... Thank you again.
the bokeh on the 105 is better, but i liked the face of the model better from the 85. it seems, judjing from your pictures, that the 105 makes the models face look more round, where the 85 makes the face a bit enlongated. i dont know how the models face looks in real life though, to make a better judjement. definately i like the 85.
I have the CV 58 1.4 Nokton, great lens! I just wanted to compare the newer AF Nikon lenses, since most have them and wonder how it compares to the newer 105 1.4E
Theoria Apophasis Sadly since this shoot I haven't had time to play around with the 105 1.4E more, I have a wedding to shoot in a couple of weeks, and probably one more portrait session before that, I need to play around with it some more, to see how I really feel about it and if this lens is for me, I do love shallow DOF and super blurry backgrounds, I do miss the Zeiss 135 1.8, rumor has it they are making a new E or A mount version of the lens.
Nice subject💯 it impossible to take a bad photo of her.
Dude seriously all the models you've had on your videos and the one who isn't a model is the finest 😍
Hahahah
What really catches my eye was the smoothness of the bokeh from the 58mmm f/1.4. Excellent review, thanks.
You are very welcome!
Best lens test on UA-cam. The direct comparisons are great and allow us to look what qualities are important for our own needs. Thank you!
Thanks for making this video! I really love how the 85 renders. I have the 58 but it is definitely a specialty lens and isn't as versatile as I wish it would be
Your very welcome! Yes I agree :)
Absolutely gorgeous model and both of you guys did a great job with each lens awesome video thanks
Your welcome!
Absolutely amazing video and your model is an amazing gorgeous Lady wow she hot
Your very welcome!! :)
Great side by side comparisons here. Nicely done.
Love my 105 for portrait/street
Really good video.
As much as I was trying to evaluate with all things taken into consideration, the darkness of the 105mm shots made it hard to favor it. I do love the larger bokeh, but I have to agree with other poster who said the 105mm shots looked flat.
Between the 85 & 58... I really liked them both, and went back & forth on the 2 lenses.
Perhaps a cool next video would be comparing all the photos after you've PP'd them & get them looking their best?
Cheers on the great video!
Yeah thats a good idea, I usually just compare the RAWs, and show the edited pics during the video. Yeah? I dont know why the 105 1.4E shots look darker, all was the same auto ISO, aperture wide open, settings? AWB too, metering was matrix for all lenses as well, kinda weird. I even updated the Nikon Df to the latest firmware and latest distortion data for August 2016.
I noticed the shutter speed was faster on the 105 shots which cold explain the darker exposures.
Good catch
I liked all the 85 shots more. Might be the better exposure. I rented the 105 1.4 and it was sharp (shockingly sharp!) but I also noticed some underexposure - I think it has poor light transmission due to so many elements. Looking to upgrade my 105 F2 DC. Think I will keep it around but add the 85mm.
85mm is such a classic portrait length, cant go wrong :)
The video is instructive but this is reason why you don’t shoot video in AF on a camera. The camera for video one should manually focus, is more artistic and fancier.
Just love the compressed backgrounds and Bokeh quality from the 105. Damn that lens is special.
yes it is! :D
Guam Photography Hi aren't you noticing that the subject is distorted(wide) on 105 compared to the 85 where the model "shay" on 85mm looks more slimmer I don't know why but it's what I noticed, did any one notice the same.
Haven't really noticed it?? you maybe right...
Really nice video.I personally prefer the 85mm as length...If i go for more than 100mm i'll go to 135mm or 200mm...Now for outdoor shooting the speedlight produce like 0 light...Around 75w i think is the output,if you use a strobe over 500w than it doesn matter what lens you use,even a 50mm 1.8g could be awesome !
If you have the 85, you don't need the 105 it seems
Yup your right :)
mate, despite the compression and sharpness, the 105 f1.4 produced flat images. the 85 did much better. you could look at the 105 f2 dc. i am confident you will like the results it produces.
I used to have the 180mm 2.8 , loved that lens as well, I tried out the 105 F2, and 135 F2, awhile back , need to get my hands on one again to try out :) I do want to get away from the AF-D nikons, too much CA at times and slight haze, but then again if you always post process your images like I do, it shouldn't matter, thanks for the comment :)
*****
trust me, the 105dc will impress. the tokina 100mm macro isnt too shabby either.
The compression and the "flatness" are the same thing. That's exactly what some people love about shooting 105mm at f/1.4. If you don't like it, you can stop down, or use a wider focal length.
Opie Frim not the same thing at all pop comes from less lens elements always
Thanks for the detailed comparison!
Biggie music a bit loud.
The 3d pop is far better with 58 followed by the 85, 105 has sharp edged bokeh and the model is rendered flat.
Thanks for the comment! I need to use this lens more, but I know the 58mm will take it for 3D pop
Of course the 3d pop increases as you go to a wider lens. There's even more 3d pop with a 20mm or a 15mm fisheye, and everything looks flatter and flatter as you go more telephoto. That's the nature of optics.
Lol I am STILL undecided which lens....85, 105 or 135. Oh and whether she is a model or not she is gorgeous. Like to see more of her if you can manage it.
Yes I can, we still keep in contact :) maybe in 2019!
I would choose the classic 85 1.4 :) but if you shoot mostly outdoors then the 135 1.8 is great!
9:13 Could it really be motion blur? It says 1/1250s! Also, at 9:45 you say the 105 and 58 are shooting darker than the 85. Well, the 85 is 1/1250s and the 105 and 58 are 1/1600s. Other settings remain the same.
Could be the auto exposure each camera is trying to do, but thanks for your comment sir!
Hey man ! I just got my new old stock never used film F6 and needed to know what primes are the sharpest!
Both the 85mm and 105mm 1.4 is very sharp :)
Great review... What do you think of your Nikon Df? I know it's been out now for a while. How would you compare it to other cameras?
Jeebus, she is gorgeous. That being said, I am sold on the 105. I rented it and it spoiled me. Saving my pennies...And I agree...she is a model.
Still keep in contact with Shay, I should ask her to model for the channel again!
@@GuamPhotography yes sir you should.
Woot! Proud owner of the Nikon 105 1.4ED. Just in time for spring!
85mm give the more natural look, skin tone, color and face is better looking than on 105mm (give much wider face - and compression is too high)...
My choice will be 85mm :) ....
Same here :)
Would you choose the Nikon D750 or the Sony A7ii? I'm an Amateur photographer who prefers shooting more nightly portraits. Thank you.
I would choose the Nikon D750, just for the battery life, and they way it feels in my hands, I really don't like the SONY A7 series, battery life was very terrible for me :(
I really appreciate the reply, I've recently been leaning towards Nikon based on the lens prices.
Motion blur at 1/1000 of a second? Thanks for the comparison!
Good review. The 85 may need to be calibrated - seems consistently off. The 85 should be just as sharp as 105
I think you're right, maybe the 85 1.4G did need calibration.
Shay is absolutely stunning!
I have the Sigma ART 135mm f/1.8, fantastic bokeh, my only lens that is not a Nikon (and I have many lenses) because Nikon does not offer a good 135mm.
Great video but I think you should have shot with the same settings for every set, I noticed with the 105 you consistently shot at a higher shutter speed resulting in a darker image which it look more flat than it should be in comparison to the 85mm. If you run into this on accident however Lightroom has a feature to match the exposure between a selected set of frames, comes in super hand when I'm doing engagement shoots and sometimes accidentally adjust the shutter and end up with a couple darker/brighter images.
Thanks for the tip!! :)
Which photo software u used on this video? Btw nice review & keep it up.
The best lens 105mm F2DC isn't in the mix.. It would wipe the floor with all of them.
Right on. 105 DC is the best lens in Nikon's line up. Additional sharpness is not that important in a lens. It about the quality of rendition. The new 105 is a turd lens
What is the specialty of 58mm?
This is taken from DP Reivew: "The 58mm focal length may look like an odd choice, but it's deliberately evocative of a legendary Nikon lens - the manual focus Noct-Nikkor 58mm f/1.2 from the late 1970s. Indeed Nikon's marketing material draws a parallel between them, saying the new 58mm's 'design concept' pays homage to the old 'Noct'. Stripped of its marketing-speak, this translates to a lens design which goes to extremes to minimize peripheral aberrations such as coma at large apertures, while also paying specific attention to the rendition of out-of-focus regions of the frame, or 'bokeh'."
www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikon-58mm-f1-4g
Portrait lens for a DX body. It has an 87mm field of view on DX.
Focus-recompose at f1.4. Good luck with that!
First time ever I'm on the lens video not into lenses. Wonder why ...
Shay is so goddamn pretty!!! WIsh she could model for me to take some photos
Good review! Keep up the good work.
Thank You!
The 105 being darker would be an issue for me.
Модель милашка добрая. Фигура шикарная, объективы как и модель мечта любого фотографа
By the way maybe she isn't a model but she could be. So gorgeous
Yes I think she can be as well!
85 14.g has warmer skin tones.
The white balance sliders exist, and you can make the skin tones whatever you want them to be. Thanks.
Great video, thank you
Your very welcome! :)
Why does 105mm shoots darker than the 85mm? Seems like 85mm is the bang for the buck with some editing
Im not too sure, but 85 1.4 is a great focal length, even indoors, 105 may be a bit too long.
very hot model
Way to Go Brad Berger / Berger-Bros. Camera. ...From New York, to Guam, and back to New York! www.berger-bros.com
Long Island's premier Nikon Dealer!
FULL SIZE RAW ?????
Yes I was looking at the full size RAW photos.
The 105 F2 DC is a better portrait lens than any of those. It's not quite as sharp, but guess what? Extreme sharpness is undesirable in a portrait lens. Unless you like looking at skin pores, makeup edges, pimples, etc...women in particular hate to see all that stuff.
Yes thats true, we have gotten away from understanding that for a portrait lens, sharpness isn't that critical, but some do want to see a 3D pop, from a super sharp subject with a blurry background. I too don't care so much if the lens isn't as sharp, since I'm mostly a portrait shooter.
Yep. The sharper it is, the more time you'll spend in post-processing softening skin, etc.
I'm indecisive. I have a 135mm 18 that is sharp, but I thought the 105mm 1.4 may be more convenient and I love a sharp lenses. My old 85 1.8 isn't as sharp anymore so I've been thinking about the 85mm 1.4. I tend to use the 85 and 35 the whole wedding. My sharp 135 is so long so, I barely use it, but I still wanna keep it because it's sharp. I'm thinking I'd use the 105 more because it isn't as far and it sounds like I could trust it during a ceremony.
Some people call the Nikon 105mm 1.4E a baby 200 f/2, since the bokeh is just so nice!! If your hardly using the 135 1.8 and its too long for you, I would get the Nikon 105 1.4E one of my favorite lenses, its very sharp!
@@GuamPhotography It's not a baby 200 F/2. It's not even in the same ballpark. It's the Ferrari of images. The 105 is a slightly longer 85mm. I shoot with a 35mm/85mm 1.4G, and a 200 F/2. Only three lenses you need. Better off with a used 200 F/2 than a 105mm 1.4.
i have 58 nd 85 but i tend to use 58 more because of versatility, i wish i could combine 35 + 58 1.4 zoom and another body with 85.
I love the 58 1.4G :)
same to me, i have 58 and 35, 58 picture feel like leica
The video was full of amateurish focus hunting, making it almost impossible to watch.
Why don't you folks set the video in manual(fixed) focusing, since most of the time you we were in fixed position.
The review is otherwise good!
You’re fulla crap saying it was almost impossible to watch the video. Comments like this and the people that make them are so toxic to the comment section.
Nice review! I have made a comparison video with the Laowa 105mm F2 STF, which you may find interesting ;)
Okay, thank you! Will check it out soon!
I recently rented the 58/1.4 and 105/1.4E and comparing them to my 85/1.4g I came to the exact same conclusion as you. (The 58/1.4 producing interesting images, but it needed a +18 AF tuning which really put me off). Great review!
Thanks!!
She is beautiful
Great tests and Shay is stunning
Great job
He is more intersted in commenting whether she is a model or not
Какое же у него сливочное боке у 105 и дикая резкость в кадре
Awesome job guys, but, it is AMAZING how much the GX8 looses focus while you do your video. Next time you should definitely not rely on it's auto-focus and just use manual focus. Thanks!
Yes , in our latest video (5D Mark IV), we just used Manual focus most of the time :)
She is sooooo besutiful
Hopefully you are not just friends with model guys but 105 has just so shallow dof so not sure it really matters its 1.4. Some of the comments below said maybe 105 2 DC performs maybe even better you have to test it out not only the question of price but overall worth it or not
can I have a comparison with the 85 and the 105 at the closest focus (head shot) in order to compare compression/distortion of the face cause I do a lot head shot and I want to know if the 105mm would be better than my 85mm.
thank you in advance!
Super photography
Das Nikon 105 mm 1.4C ist an einer D3x der Hammer zeichnen mit Licht.... das Nikon 85 mm 1.4G ist an einer Nikon D6 besser als das 105 mm 1 4G das 58 ist an allen Kameras Top! Würde das 85 1.4G und das 105 mm 1.4E den Nikon 58 mm 1 4G vorziehen alle drei sind Optiken auf höchsten Niveau.
Hi @GuamPhotography would like to know how does this lens stops down as my copy stops down like f1.4 then f1.7...f2.0...f2.4...f2.8.. is it like this on your copy too as mine copy doesn't stops at 1.6 & 1.8 ?? it's a bit wiered.
Oh that is weird??! im sorry I sold the lens already :( I cant test it
even though, auto focusing was not good!, but you made me sure how to choose right a lens somewhere!.....thanks!...
Haha you're welcome!
My three portraits lenses with my two Nikon D4 and the Nikon F5. Shoot the most the 105mm than the 85mm and rarely the 135mm.
Nikon AF 85mm f/1.4D IF
Nikon AF DC 105mm f/2D
Nikon AF DC 135mm f/2D
I never shot with the 135mm f/2 I think I should!!
Some time ago I sold my 85mm 1.4G ( didnt enjoy softness @f1.4 and misfocusing so often), and bought Nikkor 135mm f2DC.
How is your experience with the 135mm f/2 DC? Are the photos gorgeous and better than the 85mm f/1.4? There are mixed opinions about it.
I have AF fine set to +20 on all my 3 D750's, and with that I can not be sure about focus accuracy, BUT still I am getting more accurate shots then 85mm provided. My 85mm was checked in factory, and it was good, friends 85mm also do lots of inaccurate shots.
But if we are comparing them, 135mm gives softer image in a good way, I really enjoy feel of image , specially with portraits in good light (shade, chromatic aberration is terrible). of course, it's not that sharp as 85mm @f2.
And if I compare it against 70-200 VR2 2.8, at close distance 135mm gives more magnification, compression, 70-200 have focal breathing problem. And 135mm have nicer bokeh, nicer colors, but softer look.
85mm, 70-200mm I am using for anything, landscapes, portraits, night, day .. but 135mm for me is strictly for portraits, and if model have some skin problem or wrinkles this is THE tool to use. :)
But probably I should get it to warranty check, AF fine tune+20 isn't normal and I get out of focus shots quite a lot.
In the end I would say it's extra lens. surly you can live without it. I dont know how long I will live without 85mm f1.4, but this time Sigma Art, if it is any good.
Thanks a lot for your response. I think I have to rent a 135mm f/2 DC lens and see for myself because some people rave about it as THE ultimate portrait lens in Nikon world while some say it is too soft, chromatic aberration is bad, focus is difficult. I understand that this is a difficult lens to use but I hope those who have mastered it are praising it to the sky. If it is truly the king of portrait lenses then I think I should work hard to learn to use it. Shall start with a rented lens... Thank you again.
You stated your a natural light guy. Hmmm! Her face wasn't lit at all. In my opinion. Nice video tho.
Love that sweet girl!
the bokeh on the 105 is better, but i liked the face of the model better from the 85. it seems, judjing from your pictures, that the 105 makes the models face look more round, where the 85 makes the face a bit enlongated. i dont know how the models face looks in real life though, to make a better judjement. definately i like the 85.
I would chose the 85 over the 105 1.4, its just a classic portrait length on Full Frame (35mm).
Bokeh balls on the 105 are cat's eye. Undesirable. Round is what you want.
great model
I agree... Shay certainly is a model!
God I love sexy Nikon Glass
Terrible review.
youre using the WRONG 58mm, the nikkor 58mm is JUNK
Use the Voigtlander 58mm 1.4 Nokton.
I have the CV 58 1.4 Nokton, great lens! I just wanted to compare the newer AF Nikon lenses, since most have them and wonder how it compares to the newer 105 1.4E
hugs man………so how you feeling now? any statement is valid, which one you love more 'now' ? :)
Theoria Apophasis Sadly since this shoot I haven't had time to play around with the 105 1.4E more, I have a wedding to shoot in a couple of weeks, and probably one more portrait session before that, I need to play around with it some more, to see how I really feel about it and if this lens is for me, I do love shallow DOF and super blurry backgrounds, I do miss the Zeiss 135 1.8, rumor has it they are making a new E or A mount version of the lens.
Shay is so fine! 😂 but seriously tho, the 105 is dreamy but the 85 seems to be a better buy
Yes I would agree :)
likeee
humm.. Swirly bokeh on a 2000$+ lens??? It's a nop
Some great lenses have swirley bokeh in certain circumstances. It has nothing to do with price.
I think its pretty.
Shay isn't a model? Could of fooled me!
All full frame lens You have to be a Pro. tp owm them.
Boekeh of 105 is dizzy swirl, and cateye it's the weakest of all 3 of them.
only intelligent comment in this entire review.