Keep in mind that Belkin is part of Foxconn now, so it's not the same company as it once was. Interestingly, the Satechi has the same, not so good imho, type of slide on international plug adapter as the 140 W Aukey I recently got. Even though they slide on, the little square between the US pins is the only thing that holds the plugs in place once sliden on and the overall design uses a lot less plastic in the construction, which makes them feel flimsy and not attached properly.
haha, yeah, the Belkin is not bad, it feels like it had older modes of operation but I look at that as a positive. I have USB A to C cables and C to C so I could make use of the Belkin charger as a daily driver, charging 4 devices.
Power efficiency rules! Will save you money on the long term! DOE level 6 should be mandatory by now for all types of power adapters. So the Belkin is the best in this test.
Wish I saw this video before I bought the Satechi 108W wall charger. They claim the top port goes to 100W, but my testings agree with yours that it's more like a 90-18 split. It completely cannot deal with my laptop which needs a bit over 90W power at times, making it useless for me. I had to purchase Anker 717 for my laptop instead.
The value chart could use some better numbers though so maybe moving the size, volume, into that chart will help. I wouldn't compare to number of ports or type of ports, that's too far from useful. I had asked what people want when I introduced that chart and got crickets. So, maybe 5 columns with one being volume, in cubic centimeters, and one being watts/liter? Remove ports.
@@AllThingsOnePlace I personally feel all data is useful data, just what is it useful for is the question. We're moving into a USB C world, but that doesn't mean that we'll be leaving USB A behind anytime soon, so I feel at least the types supported still matters. Sorry if I didn't respond to the chart question, I've only recently been consistently watching your stuff. Cubic centimeters is fine for volume, but I recommend making it Watts/Cubic Centimeter just to make it consistent. Or milliliters and Watts/milliliters.
I think manufacturers continue to include a thin layer of plastic packaging on devices like this because they're worried an end customer will return the device if it arrives slightly scuffed, which it might if it ends up rubbing and rattling against the cardboard tray (slightly abrasive) and/or the rest of the packaging during its long shipping journey. Personally, I think that's a dumb reason and the slightest hint of rubbing on a plastic device that will immediately get scuffed way worse the first time you try to use it is completely irrelevant, but the marketing and packaging people at companies like this are absolutely obsessed with the out of box "experience"...
Yep, 100% with you. The larger Satechi packaging, which I didn't show, came in a plastic tray, exactly molded to the shape, so it really didn't have any excuse to wrap in more plastic. It has a plastic cover over that too so it really can't move. But yet, that one was fully wrapped in plastic. I had one of these arrive with a cardboard box and no packing at all, just loose in the box with a piece of paper, not a mark on it.
Hi friend Kudos for these great and science based reviews One question: I wonder how these chargers will perform if used here in the middle east on 220 Volt? What is your advice? Thx
Yeah, I do test on both voltages sometimes. The DC side will be identical. In general there is a tradeoff on the AC side. The idle power will be worse on 220 but the efficiency can be higher (not always). In general the power quality gets worse. I usually see about the same real watts into the device but apparent power will be higher if the device does not have a PFC built in, essentially this means a little more real cost to the user.
I feel like I see the figure-8 style power cables frequently, not as often as the 3-prong ones you put into power supplies but almost as often. Is that a standard of some sort or could it become standard for power that needs to go above the USB-C 240W current max? It seems much nicer than barrel jacks.
I like hearing these more opinionated conclusions like "terrible...". It honestly really is more helpful sometimes to hear what's bad - not just what's so so or okay or "could be better'.
mmmhmm thanks and I agree, but I do need to find a way to soften the blow somewhat. I got a lot of negative feedback on my last video and I ended up replacing it with the "be kind" version which is certainly worse.
I’m beginning to think the designers of USB power supplies don’t really care about either supplying power effectively or making good use of the USB standard.
Excellent video! Too bad I found it after purchasing larger Satechi 108W brick, that I have now returned. Not only I confirmed your measurements of poor idle power consumption and efficiency, I also found it produces ugly more than 100mV ripple in audible 4kHz range, that is complete showstopper - causing coil whines in connected devices that were otherwise completely quiet with other charger. This is not the first Satechi product that looks find on the first glance, but it is completely technical disaster. I am not sure how it is even possible that you can still such poorly engineered products these days. I will try out the Belkin one as I am looking for something that can power MiSTer and USB-C screen without resetting the power.
Yeah, I'm not sure why Satechi releases great products and complete fails. They're all marketed the same so it is very confusing to know what you are going to get. Interesting on the ripple side and making noise in devices. I have experienced that with other equipment but not USB adapters yet, surprisingly. Noise from the adapter is somewhat common.
Thanks so much for this :) was superrr waiting. So I guess the satechi wall charger is a no-go😢. But hmmmm… still craving for a compact travel-friendly sized adapter that offers 100+W; sized like 65W adapter but spits out 100W😂. Do you think there would ever be a model like this?😮
Great review, I currently have 2 Satechis 108 watts chargers. Should I stop using them? Regardless of the power idle consumption I’m more worried of any posible harm to one of my devices (Nintendo Switch, iPhone, iPad…) What do you think?
ah yeah, I was going to say the brick one is fine. The small one kind of sucks performance wise. It does still work fine it's just not efficient. In terms of it operating and being safe, it checks those boxes, it will just cost more a little amount more money to operate per year.
can you please suggest a multi port 100w+ desktop charger? My satechi 100w charger bought in June stopped charging my MBP and only charges my phones slowly. I wish I found your videos before buying that. thanks
Hmm, there are tons of options. For 100 watt desktop I use the gan3 baseus and the 165 watt satechi. Even though I don’t need the extra watts it keeps the charger operating cooler with lots of devices plugged in.
Thank you for the video! I bought the Belkin to give enough power to my Asus Rog Ally, while using a usb c dock, which is specified to send power up to 100 watts to the connected device. Normally it needs 65 Watts, so i thought, the Belkin can deliver 96 watts, the Usb Hub will need some power and give the rest to the Rog Ally. But the Belkin is not giving 65 Watts to the Rog Ally, even when its connected directly to the device. Do you have a tip for me, am i doing it wrong? I used the 96W / 65W Usb C Port to try this!
I also tested it on my Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra and compared it to its original 45W Charger with the App "Ampere", and it only delivered 2000 ma, while the Samsung Charger delivered about 4850 ma...
I understand on the Samsung why this doesn't work. The S8 is using the programmable power supply mode, the Belkin lacks that. So, it is stuck in a slower charging mode. It isn't just current that matters for the charging though, so if it takes advantage of PD and is using the charger at 2A and 20V then it is probably charging at about the same speed but I doubt it is, it's probably 5V or 9V and 2A. For the USB C dock, there are so many options out there, knowing what you are using and whether it will be compatible is a question, and what protocol the Rog Ally uses for charging as well. Generally, 65W devices are going to be in the normal PD category with a 20V-3.25A output which should be in range of the Belkin with no issues. In looking up the ROG Ally, "Fast Charging Technology is tested while the device is powered off" small caveat there in the fine print, also note no definition of what fast charging is. Also for the specified charger they give specs but they don't give a protocol, "TYPE-C, 65W AC Adapter, Output: 20V DC, 3.25A, 65W, Input: 100~240V AC 50/60Hz universal" so chances are this is a proprietary protocol not compatible with USB Power Delivery. So, yes, like the Steam Deck, the Switch, and most Lenovo, Dell and HP laptops, products continue to be produced with a physical connector that is shared but charging compatibility that is not. The USB spec is free and open too. They may be forced to use the connector but not the protocol. So, the Belkin is not compatible with those devices.
@@AllThingsOnePlacePerhaps this Powerbank can reveal the protocol, the Asus Rog Ally needs? I use a INIU Fast Charge Powerbank for the Asus Rog Ally, and this one is giving the "right" 65W to it.Model Name is: BI-B63, Out1=5V=3A 9V=3A 12V=3A 15V=3A 20V=3.25A 65W(max) - does this tell you, what kind of protocoll the Asus Rog Ally is expecting?? Would be nice to hear your thoughts about it!
Typically, the results will be a little different on 230v/50hz. In general the trend unit to unit would stay the same but usually a little less efficient at low power levels and more efficient at high power levels. I occasionally measure and show both in videos. I think the 165 watt satechi I show both.
@@AllThingsOnePlace Thanks. The Belkin seems to be a quite balanced product from your awesome review. Belkin is having sale at Hong Kong and I’m able to grab one here at around 51 usd which makes it really really attractive to me.
@@mk_787 Actually, I made a mistake on that 140W adapter, I have the voltme and haven't tested it yet. So, there will be another 140W video with that one and more.
@@AllThingsOnePlace That's great to hear. I compared the Voltme to those other chargers based on pictures. One major difference I noticed is that the gaps between the ports on Voltme are perfectly equal (distance between C1 & C2 = distance between C2 & Type A), which indicates that it has a different PCB design compared to the Shargeek. The Shargeek and it's comparables all have their second Type C port not perfectly aligned in the middle of the top Type C port and the bottom Type A port (distance between C1 & C2 > distance between C2 & Type A). That's why I find the Voltme interesting and placed an order for it. It's arriving today and I hope I'm not making a bad purchase. I'll make sure to watch your review of it. The Anker 140W single port looked promising but it has tons of negative Amazon reviews complaining about it's reliability (lots of DOA, lots of RMA after a few days/few times of regular use/few months, etc.). I almost bought the Anker to pair it with my 737 power bank until I saw those Amazon reviews.
@@DSSRR I don't see any reason why connecting through a power strip should be a problem. The obvious things apply, like a safety listed model, don't daisy chain them, etc.
Is the Belkin compatible with Samsung's super fast charging 2.0? Also would like to know if the Belkin BoostCharge pro PPS 65w works with Samsung's SFC 2.0.
This 108W Belkin is not compatible. It will still charge, but at lower speed, 10 or 15 watts probably. The PPS charger hopefully will work but they don't say anything on the entire product page about what it actually supplies, also absolutely no technical specifications are provided at all, not even a user manual (which we know is just a lot of paper and no specs also). They put everything on the product label, just put a picture of the label on the web site... So, no idea. Also, looks like it is out of stock.
To be honest, I am not really impressed with any of these 3. I think they all have their issues, because each one misses the mark in one area or the other. I think that Basseus are still the winners in the power adapter USB charger realm. Its really sad seeing big name brands falling short, yet no name brands from China like Basseus, outclasses them all. Honestly, I think we need to stop having high expectations from brands like Anker and Belkin. A name means nothing, if the product isn't there to back it up.
Baseus is very impressive performance wise. I wonder if the Evatronic copy will do as well. I expect it to be exactly the same. It seems like each has a category they are good at. Anker rules 120-150 watts. Satechi is king at 165 watts. Baseus rules 100 watts. Belkin is great at low wattage, 30. UGREEN is on top at 20 watts. Everything I've looked at above 165 hasn't been great, ha. I do understand what Belkin did with this product, labelled the ports clearly, and identified how each works right on the product, as well as thought about how they work. Not more ports for the sake of more ports.
@@AllThingsOnePlace The problem with Baseus is that they don't offer plugs other than US or EU. I need a decent 100w gan charger that has a UK plug and I can't find any :(
@@DrCmoments Apparently Baseus was founded in 2011, and I assume that they are well known in China. But reality is, they came out of nowhere and just showed up in the US market not that long ago. They are not a known brand here. And even though they market their products to the US now, if you asked any American if they know the Baseus brand, most would say no.
So glad i found this channel, great work! Hello from Australia!
Hello! Thanks for watching!
@@AllThingsOnePlace going to purchase the Bellkin when I wake up! Perfect for my home office no, no more charger brick
Keep in mind that Belkin is part of Foxconn now, so it's not the same company as it once was. Interestingly, the Satechi has the same, not so good imho, type of slide on international plug adapter as the 140 W Aukey I recently got. Even though they slide on, the little square between the US pins is the only thing that holds the plugs in place once sliden on and the overall design uses a lot less plastic in the construction, which makes them feel flimsy and not attached properly.
Yep, I actually tried the slide on plug things... and it didn't fit, forgot to mention that.
@@AllThingsOnePlace ouch! That's terrible, they do at least fit on mine, just not as well as you'd expect them to.
omg uploaded 1 day ago, thank god I'm in the market for the belkin, lets see how this video plays out!
haha, yeah, the Belkin is not bad, it feels like it had older modes of operation but I look at that as a positive. I have USB A to C cables and C to C so I could make use of the Belkin charger as a daily driver, charging 4 devices.
Power efficiency rules! Will save you money on the long term! DOE level 6 should be mandatory by now for all types of power adapters. So the Belkin is the best in this test.
Yeah, it depends on how many devices you have too.
I was about to buy Satechi 108W USB C PD Desktop Charger, and I watched your video, and I decided to not buy. Thank you!
Yeah, those were not great.
Wish I saw this video before I bought the Satechi 108W wall charger. They claim the top port goes to 100W, but my testings agree with yours that it's more like a 90-18 split. It completely cannot deal with my laptop which needs a bit over 90W power at times, making it useless for me. I had to purchase Anker 717 for my laptop instead.
Yeah, it's like they put out models just to have more models but a lot of them aren't very good.
Thanks for the comprehensive review. Is Belkin still a good choice?
Yeah, it is.
I got the Belkin power adaptor already, and it's okay overall.
Any plans to include in the review the comparison of the wall adapters physical sizes to their wattage and number/type of ports ?
The value chart could use some better numbers though so maybe moving the size, volume, into that chart will help. I wouldn't compare to number of ports or type of ports, that's too far from useful. I had asked what people want when I introduced that chart and got crickets. So, maybe 5 columns with one being volume, in cubic centimeters, and one being watts/liter? Remove ports.
@@AllThingsOnePlace I personally feel all data is useful data, just what is it useful for is the question. We're moving into a USB C world, but that doesn't mean that we'll be leaving USB A behind anytime soon, so I feel at least the types supported still matters.
Sorry if I didn't respond to the chart question, I've only recently been consistently watching your stuff.
Cubic centimeters is fine for volume, but I recommend making it Watts/Cubic Centimeter just to make it consistent. Or milliliters and Watts/milliliters.
I think manufacturers continue to include a thin layer of plastic packaging on devices like this because they're worried an end customer will return the device if it arrives slightly scuffed, which it might if it ends up rubbing and rattling against the cardboard tray (slightly abrasive) and/or the rest of the packaging during its long shipping journey.
Personally, I think that's a dumb reason and the slightest hint of rubbing on a plastic device that will immediately get scuffed way worse the first time you try to use it is completely irrelevant, but the marketing and packaging people at companies like this are absolutely obsessed with the out of box "experience"...
Yep, 100% with you. The larger Satechi packaging, which I didn't show, came in a plastic tray, exactly molded to the shape, so it really didn't have any excuse to wrap in more plastic. It has a plastic cover over that too so it really can't move. But yet, that one was fully wrapped in plastic. I had one of these arrive with a cardboard box and no packing at all, just loose in the box with a piece of paper, not a mark on it.
Hi friend
Kudos for these great and science based reviews
One question:
I wonder how these chargers will perform if used here in the middle east on 220 Volt?
What is your advice?
Thx
Yeah, I do test on both voltages sometimes. The DC side will be identical. In general there is a tradeoff on the AC side. The idle power will be worse on 220 but the efficiency can be higher (not always). In general the power quality gets worse. I usually see about the same real watts into the device but apparent power will be higher if the device does not have a PFC built in, essentially this means a little more real cost to the user.
I feel like I see the figure-8 style power cables frequently, not as often as the 3-prong ones you put into power supplies but almost as often. Is that a standard of some sort or could it become standard for power that needs to go above the USB-C 240W current max? It seems much nicer than barrel jacks.
Yeah, the figure-8 style is a standard, it is an IEC C7 plug. These can easily handle hundreds of watts on the AC side.
I like hearing these more opinionated conclusions like "terrible...". It honestly really is more helpful sometimes to hear what's bad - not just what's so so or okay or "could be better'.
mmmhmm thanks and I agree, but I do need to find a way to soften the blow somewhat. I got a lot of negative feedback on my last video and I ended up replacing it with the "be kind" version which is certainly worse.
I’m beginning to think the designers of USB power supplies don’t really care about either supplying power effectively or making good use of the USB standard.
These do follow the rules for PD 3.1. The power sharing is all up to the manufacturer though.
Thanks for doing this review, the port placement really is atrocious. So much space, but they decided to clump all the ports at the top.
Yeah, I wasn't a big fan of the 108W Satechi design choice there.
Great work! Really helpful as always 😀
Thanks for watching! Yeah, 108 watts is weird.
Excellent video! Too bad I found it after purchasing larger Satechi 108W brick, that I have now returned. Not only I confirmed your measurements of poor idle power consumption and efficiency, I also found it produces ugly more than 100mV ripple in audible 4kHz range, that is complete showstopper - causing coil whines in connected devices that were otherwise completely quiet with other charger. This is not the first Satechi product that looks find on the first glance, but it is completely technical disaster. I am not sure how it is even possible that you can still such poorly engineered products these days. I will try out the Belkin one as I am looking for something that can power MiSTer and USB-C screen without resetting the power.
Yeah, I'm not sure why Satechi releases great products and complete fails. They're all marketed the same so it is very confusing to know what you are going to get. Interesting on the ripple side and making noise in devices. I have experienced that with other equipment but not USB adapters yet, surprisingly. Noise from the adapter is somewhat common.
Love this channel
Thanks!
Thanks so much for this :) was superrr waiting. So I guess the satechi wall charger is a no-go😢. But hmmmm… still craving for a compact travel-friendly sized adapter that offers 100+W; sized like 65W adapter but spits out 100W😂. Do you think there would ever be a model like this?😮
The 120W anker is about on par.
@@AllThingsOnePlaceis that the Anker 737?
@@GusI727 Yes.
You can try TechnoAmp brand chargers for throttle benchmark❤
Replied on other thread.
Great review, I currently have 2 Satechis 108 watts chargers. Should I stop using them? Regardless of the power idle consumption I’m more worried of any posible harm to one of my devices (Nintendo Switch, iPhone, iPad…)
What do you think?
Sorry I’m referring to the 3 port 108w charger, the smaller one
ah yeah, I was going to say the brick one is fine. The small one kind of sucks performance wise. It does still work fine it's just not efficient. In terms of it operating and being safe, it checks those boxes, it will just cost more a little amount more money to operate per year.
Nice Video
Thanks!
How large is that 108W Wall adapter (the one without PFC) compared to the Anker 120W adapter?
The anker is just a bit smaller, almost the same size.
can you please suggest a multi port 100w+ desktop charger? My satechi 100w charger bought in June stopped charging my MBP and only charges my phones slowly. I wish I found your videos before buying that. thanks
Hmm, there are tons of options. For 100 watt desktop I use the gan3 baseus and the 165 watt satechi. Even though I don’t need the extra watts it keeps the charger operating cooler with lots of devices plugged in.
How about 200W Gan chargers please
haha, I've done a couple of them. But yeah, there's more out now, a lot more.
Can you review the IKEA ASKSTORM charger?
Let me know if I didn't but I thought I covered it in another video, ua-cam.com/video/yuprdfPyEUs/v-deo.html It probably needs to be labeled better.
Can you review the old zendure superport s4🤔🤔🤔
It is on the list, but I haven't yet. I want to look at more of their products at some point.
Can you review Satechi 66W USB-C 3-Port GaN Wall Charger (ST-3C66WCM)?
Thanks for the suggestion. I think I have that one but it hasn’t made a video yet.
Thank you for the video! I bought the Belkin to give enough power to my Asus Rog Ally, while using a usb c dock, which is specified to send power up to 100 watts to the connected device. Normally it needs 65 Watts, so i thought, the Belkin can deliver 96 watts, the Usb Hub will need some power and give the rest to the Rog Ally. But the Belkin is not giving 65 Watts to the Rog Ally, even when its connected directly to the device. Do you have a tip for me, am i doing it wrong? I used the 96W / 65W Usb C Port to try this!
I also tested it on my Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra and compared it to its original 45W Charger with the App "Ampere", and it only delivered 2000 ma, while the Samsung Charger delivered about 4850 ma...
So is it true, that the rog ally and the galaxy tablet are not compatible with the belkin, and you can do nothing about it?
I understand on the Samsung why this doesn't work. The S8 is using the programmable power supply mode, the Belkin lacks that. So, it is stuck in a slower charging mode. It isn't just current that matters for the charging though, so if it takes advantage of PD and is using the charger at 2A and 20V then it is probably charging at about the same speed but I doubt it is, it's probably 5V or 9V and 2A.
For the USB C dock, there are so many options out there, knowing what you are using and whether it will be compatible is a question, and what protocol the Rog Ally uses for charging as well. Generally, 65W devices are going to be in the normal PD category with a 20V-3.25A output which should be in range of the Belkin with no issues. In looking up the ROG Ally, "Fast Charging Technology is tested while the device is powered off" small caveat there in the fine print, also note no definition of what fast charging is. Also for the specified charger they give specs but they don't give a protocol, "TYPE-C, 65W AC Adapter, Output: 20V DC, 3.25A, 65W, Input: 100~240V AC 50/60Hz universal" so chances are this is a proprietary protocol not compatible with USB Power Delivery.
So, yes, like the Steam Deck, the Switch, and most Lenovo, Dell and HP laptops, products continue to be produced with a physical connector that is shared but charging compatibility that is not. The USB spec is free and open too. They may be forced to use the connector but not the protocol.
So, the Belkin is not compatible with those devices.
@@AllThingsOnePlace thank you for you4 kindness and time!
@@AllThingsOnePlacePerhaps this Powerbank can reveal the protocol, the Asus Rog Ally needs? I use a INIU Fast Charge Powerbank for the Asus Rog Ally, and this one is giving the "right" 65W to it.Model Name is: BI-B63, Out1=5V=3A 9V=3A 12V=3A 15V=3A 20V=3.25A 65W(max) - does this tell you, what kind of protocoll the Asus Rog Ally is expecting?? Would be nice to hear your thoughts about it!
Liked for your attitude let’s fucking go
Thanks!
Thank God I got myself a belkin type 🙏🏿
Yep. Good pick.
I have the Satechi 108 watt adapter, very disappointed to see this. ASUS laptop always complain about it anyway, going to switch.
Yeah, these adapters are good if you take out of context but there's much better options on the market.
are the results of these test applicable to different countries' voltages?
Typically, the results will be a little different on 230v/50hz. In general the trend unit to unit would stay the same but usually a little less efficient at low power levels and more efficient at high power levels. I occasionally measure and show both in videos. I think the 165 watt satechi I show both.
the biggest problem seems to be findig good enough cables
I have a site for that... and four videos. I need to get an update out for that actually. But yes, I agree.
@@AllThingsOnePlace a site? can I get it? I'm gonna see if I can find the videos thanks again
Belkin seems to be overpriced but generally not total garbage, basically a safe bet.
Yeah, they charge a bit more for the brand for sure but it does seem quality.
is there any info on the temperature after long time use?
I didn't gather the data on these, the Belkin, I ran for the longest and it wasn't one of those, this hurts to touch kind of things.
@@AllThingsOnePlace Thanks. The Belkin seems to be a quite balanced product from your awesome review.
Belkin is having sale at Hong Kong and I’m able to grab one here at around 51 usd which makes it really really attractive to me.
Could you test the VOLTME REVO 140W?
That one is the same adapter as a bunch of the others I’ve tested so no test on that one.
@@AllThingsOnePlace 🙏 thank you for the 140w chargers episode. It's a great video
@@mk_787 Actually, I made a mistake on that 140W adapter, I have the voltme and haven't tested it yet. So, there will be another 140W video with that one and more.
@@AllThingsOnePlace That's great to hear. I compared the Voltme to those other chargers based on pictures. One major difference I noticed is that the gaps between the ports on Voltme are perfectly equal (distance between C1 & C2 = distance between C2 & Type A), which indicates that it has a different PCB design compared to the Shargeek. The Shargeek and it's comparables all have their second Type C port not perfectly aligned in the middle of the top Type C port and the bottom Type A port (distance between C1 & C2 > distance between C2 & Type A). That's why I find the Voltme interesting and placed an order for it. It's arriving today and I hope I'm not making a bad purchase. I'll make sure to watch your review of it. The Anker 140W single port looked promising but it has tons of negative Amazon reviews complaining about it's reliability (lots of DOA, lots of RMA after a few days/few times of regular use/few months, etc.). I almost bought the Anker to pair it with my 737 power bank until I saw those Amazon reviews.
Can i use tape and mount the belkin 108w under my desk?
I don’t see why not.
@@AllThingsOnePlace would it be safe to connect it to a power strip?
@@DSSRR I don't see any reason why connecting through a power strip should be a problem. The obvious things apply, like a safety listed model, don't daisy chain them, etc.
@@AllThingsOnePlace Ok thanks, also would it matter which side i mount it under my desk?
@@DSSRR That's a good question. I am not sure if one side would get hotter than the other.
Is the Belkin compatible with Samsung's super fast charging 2.0? Also would like to know if the Belkin BoostCharge pro PPS 65w works with Samsung's SFC 2.0.
This 108W Belkin is not compatible. It will still charge, but at lower speed, 10 or 15 watts probably. The PPS charger hopefully will work but they don't say anything on the entire product page about what it actually supplies, also absolutely no technical specifications are provided at all, not even a user manual (which we know is just a lot of paper and no specs also). They put everything on the product label, just put a picture of the label on the web site... So, no idea. Also, looks like it is out of stock.
@@AllThingsOnePlace thanks! Appreciate the work that you do.
Can you review essager 33w gan charger plzz
I will try to get that in at some point.
To be honest, I am not really impressed with any of these 3. I think they all have their issues, because each one misses the mark in one area or the other. I think that Basseus are still the winners in the power adapter USB charger realm. Its really sad seeing big name brands falling short, yet no name brands from China like Basseus, outclasses them all. Honestly, I think we need to stop having high expectations from brands like Anker and Belkin. A name means nothing, if the product isn't there to back it up.
Baseus is very impressive performance wise. I wonder if the Evatronic copy will do as well. I expect it to be exactly the same. It seems like each has a category they are good at. Anker rules 120-150 watts. Satechi is king at 165 watts. Baseus rules 100 watts. Belkin is great at low wattage, 30. UGREEN is on top at 20 watts. Everything I've looked at above 165 hasn't been great, ha.
I do understand what Belkin did with this product, labelled the ports clearly, and identified how each works right on the product, as well as thought about how they work. Not more ports for the sake of more ports.
@@AllThingsOnePlace The problem with Baseus is that they don't offer plugs other than US or EU. I need a decent 100w gan charger that has a UK plug and I can't find any :(
Baseus is NOT a no-name brand.
@@DrCmoments Apparently Baseus was founded in 2011, and I assume that they are well known in China. But reality is, they came out of nowhere and just showed up in the US market not that long ago. They are not a known brand here. And even though they market their products to the US now, if you asked any American if they know the Baseus brand, most would say no.
@@tek2313There's one now - CCGAN100UK Baseus :)