@@ameralhamvi5680 I'm guessing the trick there is many of those misses are actually the same exact mistake? I and an opponent left mate in 1-2 hanging on each other for a long time, running me 15 blunders with my win. I won't mention it happened during a daily game to save face.
This is why when you analyze you should only care about the moves you could've found yourself but missed. For example: if the engine tells me I missed a mate in 12, I don't care, because I don't think it is reasonable to expect me to find it. But if I missed a 4 move tactic that wins a piece, I practice more tactics. If I missed a win in the endgame, I practice endgames.
@@sangwiny4440 Yo I’m trying to gain an advantage, capturing pieces and looking for easy 2 move checkmates, the computer really be out here telling me “Oh, you captured a piece, but you missed a 23 move checkmate! How dare you, a 1000 rated player, and not a grandmaster, miss a 23 move checkmate! Aha what a loser.”
@@gabe7630 I missed M12 but confirm queen and rook for knight and a bishop and computer be like "even though you won queen and rook but your opponent can now check mate you in 5 moves" I was like : bruh if your enemy eats your queen and rook you will not be that Clam to find M5
@@randomname596 True, I beat Stockfish highest level with 2. Ke2; would still have crushed SF with it even if I didn't have 7 queens in the starting position.
Dude that teal double exclamation point symbol gave ME a fucking dopamine hit and I havent played chess in eight years. I cant imagine what it must feel like to get it on your OWN move.
AcKhUaLlY The computer is too smart for its own good, it sees moves that are completely unreasonable to spot for the average player. But yes, Levy's gf is indeed brilliant!
Might be useful to know he’s reading the lines wrong- the best line is under the ‘best move’ suggestion, the other lines are second, third, fourth best alternatives
Hikaru may claim you'll never be GM but goddammit if you aren't a grand teacher. The way you explain things, enunciate clearly, vocalise thoughts and feelings... You're just a fantastic teacher, Levy. Mad props and hat off to you, sir.
he said that levy will never be a gm unless he sacrifices everything he has and put all his time into chess which he thinks is not worth it as levy has already achieved a lot in his career@@finnmacmanus5723
@@mateocosta1770 I had the exact same situation for some reason often moving kings out of check is usually what gets brilliant moves for some reason some glitch i think
Sir, I'm back into chess after almost 30 years away from the game. Your videos, Queen's Gambit, and the amazing ability to do computer analysis of moves are the trifecta for why the game has become so fun for me, again. So, THANK YOU.
Engine: NOOO! Nc3 is the best move! YOU SHOULD'VE PLAYED KNIGHT TO C3! Me, struggling: Okay, I'll move Nc3 next turn, then! Engine: NOOOOOO! Nc3 IS A BLUNDER!!!! YOU'LL BE MATED IN SEVENTEEN!!! >:( Me, who can only see up to 2 moves: bruh
Engine in a nutshell: Trades=blunder Move to set up a good trap=mistake Taking a free piece=missed mate in 10 Playing a move that doesn't risk your piece but doesn't really help=best move
I’m an 800 player who put the game down a few years ago and has just started getting back in. I really enjoy your content and your energy, it’s pretty clear you love what you do. Keep being amazing :))
For chess improvement, I would recommend hanging pawns. His channel allowed me to go from 1600 to 2000 in two weeks. He has playlists on openings, middlegame ideas, and an awesome playlist on endgames.
@@faizanhussaini9658 What did you do for that kind of improvement over just 2 weeks? I have seen some of his videos, they are quite descriptive and detailed.
Levy, I love the way you explain to all levels. I am a 1200-1300 in 20min or 15+10 (I cannot play faster). There are many teachers in the web and even when I prefer spanish speaking teachers as my first language is Spanish, I always come back to see your videos, so instructive! Thank you for sharing your videos!
Currently on a 13 game win streak with three things: the London, Kings Indian, and DANGER LEVELS. So great to see you channel more than double in subs in just a few months :)
As a 1200, what I'm learning from this for my slow games is to evaluate if a capture needs to happen immediately or if I can take my time. Also, to evaluate how active my pieces are vs my opponent's pieces. Also also, some engine moves are just never going to occur to anyone naturally rotfl
Thanks Levi. I do a quick computer analysis of most of my games and I have always discounted many of the inaccuracies, mistakes and even some of what is called blunders by the computer. It's reassuring to see you doing the same.
I had a game a couple days ago where the engine said I made a mistake by stopping the mate that was comming the next move, like it didnt notice mate in 1 was hanging, i still cant believe it.
I've been watching your videos and doing my best to follow your advice in my games for about 3 weeks now. I got my first brilliant move today. You've well and truly earned a sub!
This is honestly really reliving. I always felt like a bad player for getting random blunders that I didn't understand. I guess you just gotta make your own judgments after a game to grow how you want.
1:22 “and now d6 and the computer at this point i will say this “you need to not rely so heavily on the computer because the computer doesn’t fully understand openings”” not only that when i analysed my game a did a “brilliant” move it went down so much and once it said hanging a queen was excellent
This is levy’s most instructive video and the most important video for beginners transitioning to intermediate players. He is single handedly the main reason I am enjoying chess so much and am excited to learn more. Entertaining and informative beyond compare. Keep being awesome, Levy 👍🏻
Signs that you’re bad and don’t know it: 1- you don’t analyze your games 2- you only analyze the games you WIN 3- when the engine says that you blundered many times you think that its ONLY because engines “ see crazy lines that noone understands “ and thinks that your game style is more “ psychological “
Sometimes no. 3 happens. Happened to me yesterday, being down a lot of material I got lucky and my opponent could have saved the game playing an impossible combination
I like to copy the PGN into ChessX (with StockFish) and change the analysis settings to Search Depth 6 with 20-30 lines depending on computer performance. I think this is closer to helping analyze what a good human would do - I can probably visualize a 6 move exchange with some effort, but the default time based settings go much deeper than I can in game. I'd be curious what you think about this as a way to mitigate the goofy parts of analysis! (mid-level player ~1500ish btw, if that affects your answer) Great video @GothamChess! One of my favorites from your great content! Love the passion about how silly computer analysis can be.
I appreciate your videos Levi, you explain things very well, it’s easy to follow. Some Masters just rip off lines so fast, it’s impossible to follow. Thanks for all your hard work.
Not gonna lie, I saw this video and I was like...does Levy think we are noobs, and then I had the moment of ohhhh wait...ohhh I am a noob when I was clicking through lol
The way you speak, the way you teach, the way you express with gestures are the reasons that I'm daily coming back to your channel. You are a great teacher of the CHESS.
The funny thing is I’ll have 95 score games with multiple blunders and missed wins by virtue of the fact that I made only the easy, natural moves in an endgame that lasted an eternity.
@@AfterthoughtTV that's not true lol, if your opponent messes up it isn't hard. I'm 1300 and I've had >99 accuracy if my opponent blunders early. Of course, as you get higher, your opponent is better, but so are you- if you know opening theory and your opponent blunders the knight, as razorlike's opponent did, then it is by no means impossible to get 99.5 accuracy without using any computer at all.
@@AfterthoughtTV thats not how it works, if the opponent makes a ton of blunders then 99 percent accuracy isnt cheating, but if the opponent played at an 80 percent accuracy then its likely cheating
Thank you, Levy for a nice video. I was very hopeful at the beginning when you said that this video would help me analyze opening, midgame and endgame phases. Instead the video was mostly about uncovering the engine's thought process. That is also good to realize and your video helped me see things differently, but this video was not a structured tutorial on how to analyze my games. Well sure, there were things to take away from each game: first game -- develop pieces, second game -- do not leave your pieces as a target, third game -- know the opening, anticipate pawn brakes. But still, this is analysis of the games. This did not teach us to analyze our games. This was you analyzing games. Nonetheless love what you do, great content.
I just finished the analysis of a game I lost online. It was my first. real analysis, with written notes and so on. It took me like 3 hours, but for the first time I feel I really learned something from a lost match: I made the same error 3 times. Thanks for this video that inspired me and also gave reeeeally helpful hints and tips about the topic. I promised myself I'll always analyze every game I play!
8:05 Thanks for that. I thought something was wrong with me when the moves that put me into game-winning positions were being analyzed as blunders, but it’s some much-needed perspective.
This makes me feel better ,today i played my first brilliant move and after i saw the analysis i was shocked ,i had 3 innacuracies,0 mistakes,0 blunders,0 missed wins and 1 brilliant move ,it felt so good that i did a screenshot ,i was so proud
the moves at the bottom are the worst moves (that are not mistakes, or blunders) @5:50 the computer is not recommending that rc1 is the best it but bc5 and the continuation for the best moves are the little ones ones underneath it.
23:05 What about the move bishop to b4? Bishop can be taken by rook but then loses rook to queen; if white threatens bishop with pawn, trade rook at e1; if they move their rook queen to a5 to remove fork but still protect the bishop; if they move pawn to c5, still queen to a5 protecting the bishop and also threatening a queen trade if they allow the rook to be taken
yeah it seriously looked like he was using an engine and just not selecting the best move unless the alternative was weak xD. but if he is 2300, we have to trust.
@@christor2907 thats either the best game of his life,or he used engine..I m 2250 on chess.com,never played a flawless game like this.i always have like an inaccuracy (short games dont count ofc,its easy to play flawless if the game ends in 9 moves)
@@RayVitoles I'm only a 950 and played last night against a 900 who got a 99.0 with 0 inaccuracies/mistakes/blunders. I was actually proud the game lasted 38 moves, and that I only had 3 inaccuracies and 1 mistake; 61 percent is great for me.
@@basebob05 its not about the accuracy..Getting 99.0%+ accuracy is not impossible by any means.Its about the absence ofinaccuracies/mistakes/blunders.Even top players will miss sth
Day 1 of telling levy that he's a great teacher
Day 1 of liking ur comment
The best
@@mishaalfareez5751 day 1 of viewing your comment
Hard agree there
Day 1 of seeing copied comment
Me: plays the best game of my life, wins in 25 moves. outplays opponent constantly
Engine: 9 mistakes, 7 blunders, 2 missed wins
And then you wake up 😂
18 out of those 25 moves are considered bad according to the engine 😅
agreed, *2 missed wins*
I play 90+ no mistake when im in a good form
@@tormentor6737 Both of them tbh
White: mates in 3 instead of 2
Engine: *You're never gonna finnancially recover from this.*
Underrated
Middlerated
Highrated
yesrated
@@theye29 unrated
Alternate title: Why you shouldn’t trust the 3000 rated cyborg telling you you’re trash
_The eval baaar looks like a metronome... 🎵_
I had a "good" game once which turned out to have had 12 missed wins fore and like 11 for my opponent. I felt baad
Lmfao
@@ameralhamvi5680 I'm guessing the trick there is many of those misses are actually the same exact mistake? I and an opponent left mate in 1-2 hanging on each other for a long time, running me 15 blunders with my win. I won't mention it happened during a daily game to save face.
Hell yeah. Cpu Bro tells me I'm trash win or lose.
This man speaks so clearly that the automatic closed captions are perfect
One time I spent like fifteen minutes trying to figure out on Google what "tufi and ketos" meant
Yo that’s so true like other people say stuff and it’s so different from what they actually said
Because it's not automated captions, a human did them
@@LeroyW70 no the OP is talking about the auto generated captions, not the other ones
Engine is like
Hanging a queen: blunder
Losing a pawn in 3 moves: blunder
Getting in a bad position after 10 moves: lol such a mistake you’re so bad
This is why when you analyze you should only care about the moves you could've found yourself but missed.
For example: if the engine tells me I missed a mate in 12, I don't care, because I don't think it is reasonable to expect me to find it.
But if I missed a 4 move tactic that wins a piece, I practice more tactics.
If I missed a win in the endgame, I practice endgames.
lol losing a pawn is a mistake or an inaccuracy. losing a full piece is considered blunder
@@randomguyontheinternet801 Depends. Losing a pawn in an endgame is often a huge blunder.
@@beri4138 In most cases it is a mistake
Post game analysis be like:
Mistakes: 0
Blunders: 0
Missed wins: 563
Don’t you love it when missed wins are like 10 moves deep?
@@henryroth5896 How dare you miss this checkmate in 12, you donkey!
@@sangwiny4440 Yo I’m trying to gain an advantage, capturing pieces and looking for easy 2 move checkmates, the computer really be out here telling me “Oh, you captured a piece, but you missed a 23 move checkmate! How dare you, a 1000 rated player, and not a grandmaster, miss a 23 move checkmate! Aha what a loser.”
i've gotten "missed win: M32" after what I thought was brilliant because it guaranteed the opponent loses their queen. i was pretty tilted
@@gabe7630 I missed M12 but confirm queen and rook for knight and a bishop and computer be like "even though you won queen and rook but your opponent can now check mate you in 5 moves" I was like : bruh if your enemy eats your queen and rook you will not be that Clam to find M5
"Where did you leave your opening knowledge?"
Roughly when I made my 2nd move.
2. Ke2 🕳
@@randomname596 what are you talking about that’s obviously the top engine line
@@randomname596 True, I beat Stockfish highest level with 2. Ke2; would still have crushed SF with it even if I didn't have 7 queens in the starting position.
Same
@@Anon_581 Wait what 7 queens! lol
"Just because a 3000 rated cyborg say you made a mistake, doesn't mean you made a mistake"
Thanks Levy, that's a good emotional boost for beginner.
He spittin fax tho
XD amazing
*3200
I laughed so hard at that line.
@@justiceforjoey2750 still in the 3000's which still makes it correct
How to analyze your game
Me an 400 rated player:I trade blunders sir
You trade blunders I trade my stooped ness
Lol 😂
😂😂😂
In elo 400 if u don’t blunder, u usually win
Game Analysis: "Accuracy: 14%"
Me: "Levy says computers are stupid so it's not my fault."
No replies in two years? I’ll change that
@@SportsShortsA lol
im here now to
What I learned:
Computer is stupid
Levy's GF is brilliant
Dude that teal double exclamation point symbol gave ME a fucking dopamine hit and I havent played chess in eight years. I cant imagine what it must feel like to get it on your OWN move.
@@americantoastman7296 ikr, ive only gotten a single brilliant and it was like my 3rd game of chess ever and it was some random rook move
@@americantoastman7296 I got my first one during a 3|2 blitz game 2 weeks ago and I got so excited I posted it all over my social media lmao.
AcKhUaLlY
The computer is too smart for its own good, it sees moves that are completely unreasonable to spot for the average player.
But yes, Levy's gf is indeed brilliant!
"Brilliant" she's 1044...
Alternative Title: Levy roasts engines
And wholesomely praises gf
Might be useful to know he’s reading the lines wrong- the best line is under the ‘best move’ suggestion, the other lines are second, third, fourth best alternatives
Levy yells at Stockfish for bullying his gf
One day I'm going to remember pieces move backwards and then gonna smash Magnum Carlos
Lmfaooo
Lool it's so hard for me to realise I should go back in some positions, idk why tho 😂
"Magnum Carlos" HHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHHAHAHAAAHAHAHH
:)) or you can continue your way and master it.
Legit laughed out loud
Hikaru may claim you'll never be GM but goddammit if you aren't a grand teacher. The way you explain things, enunciate clearly, vocalise thoughts and feelings... You're just a fantastic teacher, Levy. Mad props and hat off to you, sir.
Did Hikaru say that?
@@finnmacmanus5723 yes. You can find the video relatively easily by searching for Hikaru on why levy won't be a gm
he said that levy will never be a gm unless he sacrifices everything he has and put all his time into chess which he thinks is not worth it as levy has already achieved a lot in his career@@finnmacmanus5723
@@finnmacmanus5723 yeah
Me: trades bishop for queen
Engine: pathetic.
He‘s really out there flexing his GF‘s brilliant moves on us FeelsBadMan
True. I never got a brilliant move on chess.com till date😅
i never had a "brilliant" move by the engine, i didnt even know it existed :( FeelsBadMan
I had it once when I moved my king to the side because the queen was checking it. There were only two squares available. Lmao
@@mateocosta1770 bruh
@@mateocosta1770 I had the exact same situation for some reason often moving kings out of check is usually what gets brilliant moves for some reason some glitch i think
How to analyze your chess games: have levy explain it for you
I never knew Fabiano Caruana becomes so humble and funny when he grows beard
Well now u know
Feels so gud when I actually understand context jokes 😏😏
Gotham will be putting this on Twitter later
Lmfao
He also becomes more confident with his speech
Sir, I'm back into chess after almost 30 years away from the game. Your videos, Queen's Gambit, and the amazing ability to do computer analysis of moves are the trifecta for why the game has become so fun for me, again. So, THANK YOU.
Engine: NOOO! Nc3 is the best move! YOU SHOULD'VE PLAYED KNIGHT TO C3!
Me, struggling: Okay, I'll move Nc3 next turn, then!
Engine: NOOOOOO! Nc3 IS A BLUNDER!!!! YOU'LL BE MATED IN SEVENTEEN!!! >:(
Me, who can only see up to 2 moves: bruh
Haha! That's exactly how it feels.
Yes
Relatable
You eventually develop a feel for the right moves, even if you can only see a few moves a head. You also start to notice pawn structure more.
Title : 10 mins of Levi roasting the Computer for trying to correct his girlfriend.
yes.
@@yesyouareright9800 yes, you are right
@@dancewithgoli7817 dance with goli
@@thePersonoyt Solokill
@@ziwuri Ziwuri13
Engine in a nutshell:
Trades=blunder
Move to set up a good trap=mistake
Taking a free piece=missed mate in 10
Playing a move that doesn't risk your piece but doesn't really help=best move
Exactly.
Yeah lol i once had a missed win because i missed a 5-move double bishop sacrifice to win the queen
it looks like you're not a high elo player
@@vantiendungnguyen9443 it looks like you are not humble
Yes yes, the engine is the problem:)
I’m an 800 player who put the game down a few years ago and has just started getting back in. I really enjoy your content and your energy, it’s pretty clear you love what you do. Keep being amazing :))
Analysing endgames with the engine:
Blunder: you missed checkmate in 28 moves and only gained a rook advantage.
GothamChess is becoming the go-to UA-cam channel all about chess improvement, games, events, and fun!
For chess improvement, I would recommend hanging pawns. His channel allowed me to go from 1600 to 2000 in two weeks. He has playlists on openings, middlegame ideas, and an awesome playlist on endgames.
best fun chess channel is from Eric Rosen, now argue
@@vodam6970 can't argue with that. Man is a legend
@@faizanhussaini9658 What did you do for that kind of improvement over just 2 weeks? I have seen some of his videos, they are quite descriptive and detailed.
Yes. You should be 2000 rated in comment elo
"What did white do wrong? Well uh they didn't go for the vienna gambit"
Your username is the perfect response to your comment
She's his gf I guess he had to
is that a ww2 reference?
@@muhammadaryawicaksono4232 no it's literally a quote from the video. Levi thinks everything every move that's not the vienna gambit is a wrong move
Loool
Title should be "why my gf's moves are better than engine"
omg such a good title.
This was a very helpful video. Encouraging in ways I wasn't expecting, and therefore all the more impactful. Gonna get analyzing.
Computer: lol, your girlfriend is so bad!
Levy: So you have chosen death!
me every game: Looks like that game slipped through your fingers
The game was decided because of one fault
“Chess is a strategic game”
IM Levy Rozman: 28:23
lel
Levy, I love the way you explain to all levels. I am a 1200-1300 in 20min or 15+10 (I cannot play faster). There are many teachers in the web and even when I prefer spanish speaking teachers as my first language is Spanish, I always come back to see your videos, so instructive! Thank you for sharing your videos!
26:03 Love that reaction. That is definitely a top tier GM or hyper-advanced AI level play.
10:56 lol I'm dying 😂😂😂. That smirk, he was just afraid that his GF is gonna be upset.
Levy: Make sure you don't make the same mistake two times or three times
Me: Plays 1.a3 every game as white
Nice move
Always start from top left. 2.b3 , 3.c3. That’s what “book move” means right?
GAME LOSING BLUNDER
@@mjtpli mega brain pog
@@yoruichixx6951 the evaluation would prob go to -0.7 or somethn honestly.
Currently on a 13 game win streak with three things: the London, Kings Indian, and DANGER LEVELS. So great to see you channel more than double in subs in just a few months :)
Love the way you explained it using analysis, something everyone can and should do!
that was kinda the point of this video
As a 1200, what I'm learning from this for my slow games is to evaluate if a capture needs to happen immediately or if I can take my time. Also, to evaluate how active my pieces are vs my opponent's pieces. Also also, some engine moves are just never going to occur to anyone naturally rotfl
27:00
lol, I've never castled with no pawns on front
Perfect timing, this video comes right after I just finished a game where I blundered mate in 2 🤣 (without realising)
same here, mate in 3 ahahah still won, but in a much more complicated way than I should have lol
I missed mate in 1 .....and won after 15 moves
Saddd 😅😅😅
Ameture, I blundered mate in 1... 6 times in a row
I missed mate in 16 😭🤣
I find that part of getting better at chess is finding the answers to "wait, why does the 3000 rated cyborg thinks this is a good move?!"
Thanks Levi. I do a quick computer analysis of most of my games and I have always discounted many of the inaccuracies, mistakes and even some of what is called blunders by the computer. It's reassuring to see you doing the same.
I had a game a couple days ago where the engine said I made a mistake by stopping the mate that was comming the next move, like it didnt notice mate in 1 was hanging, i still cant believe it.
@@kevinjohnson4288 I'm sure you could just look at the lines the computer gives in that position.
I've been watching your videos and doing my best to follow your advice in my games for about 3 weeks now. I got my first brilliant move today. You've well and truly earned a sub!
This is honestly really reliving. I always felt like a bad player for getting random blunders that I didn't understand. I guess you just gotta make your own judgments after a game to grow how you want.
first time im seeing someone achieving the double exclamation mark move.
I've done it once but I never knew why it was so good
@@suryanarayan2032 that's called accidentally brilliant
Alternate Title: Lucy's Immortal game analyzed
When u're so early that Levi Potter Rozman haven't pinned a comment yet
his last name is potter???
@@valzanb yes
Levy Potter Rozman just pinned your comment!
- Notification Bell
@@parabolaaaaa4919 i thought its was “Rozman”
*Levy*
the explanation for game 2 was phenomenal. especially the summary recap at the end - that really nails in the lessons and make them stick
You're a good speaker and your hand gestures and eye contact are amazing. In general, an amazing teacher.
Levy trying to break all the youtube algorithms after uploading so much content on daily basis. Please don’t exhaust yourself senpai.
Levy is KILLING IT with the frequent uploads!
Agreed 👍
I love some games that both me and my opponent havent seen 1 move, and we both get 10 blunders each
1:22 “and now d6 and the computer at this point i will say this “you need to not rely so heavily on the computer because the computer doesn’t fully understand openings”” not only that when i analysed my game a did a “brilliant” move it went down so much and once it said hanging a queen was excellent
14:18
my reactions when i see my game analysis:
lmfao
Bros got the warden pfp
Kaissa's blessings also play a big part in improving at chess. Don't forget that, Levy.
Ttile: "How to Analyze Your Chess Games"
Content: "Here are a bunch of reasons that it is hard to analyze chess games."
so ture
I agere
my thoughts exatcly
I didn't even know it was possible to get a "Brilliant!"
You are everywhere, General
Its weird. It justs means one move is way better than all others. It can be an extremely easy one to find.
A move is brilliant if it takes the high ground
@@reubenconner1679 or if it gives you Roshan
I have once when i moved my king to closer my pawn in endgame
This is levy’s most instructive video and the most important video for beginners transitioning to intermediate players. He is single handedly the main reason I am enjoying chess so much and am excited to learn more. Entertaining and informative beyond compare. Keep being awesome, Levy 👍🏻
This was an amazing way to look at games and understand the different ideas behind each move. I'm a 1400 player and it was very useful for me.
Signs that you’re bad and don’t know it:
1- you don’t analyze your games
2- you only analyze the games you WIN
3- when the engine says that you blundered many times you think that its ONLY because engines “ see crazy lines that noone understands “ and thinks that your game style is more “ psychological “
Sometimes no. 3 happens. Happened to me yesterday, being down a lot of material I got lucky and my opponent could have saved the game playing an impossible combination
So, yeah, it happens
4. You only play 3 min blitz and wonder why you aren’t getting better
I guess I am not a bad player then 🙂🙂🙂🙂😐😐😐😑
Except I am just 600
@@kappablanca5192 lmao
I like to copy the PGN into ChessX (with StockFish) and change the analysis settings to Search Depth 6 with 20-30 lines depending on computer performance. I think this is closer to helping analyze what a good human would do - I can probably visualize a 6 move exchange with some effort, but the default time based settings go much deeper than I can in game. I'd be curious what you think about this as a way to mitigate the goofy parts of analysis! (mid-level player ~1500ish btw, if that affects your answer)
Great video @GothamChess! One of my favorites from your great content! Love the passion about how silly computer analysis can be.
when a 1044 rated player makes a brilliant move
Ikr I'm a 1200+ rated player and I don't think I have ever made a brilliant move
I'm ~1600 and I've only done it once
1950 and only twice lmao, I think it's based on whether the computer could find it in a certain amount of time or not!
I’m a 600 and have done it twice 😭
@@ritikjain6956 Why 😭? That's impressive
if levy streamed game 3, his chat would be full of people saying razorlike is a cheater
castling into wide open space was crazy I'd never think of doing that
20:30 i saw the d4 move, and saw it for the right reasons. I literally yelled in happiness. Also great, great video, thanks
"He's forked" That describes my position in every chess match haha
Getting a Brilliant on a Move is such a legendary moment if you ever get it.
Someone should make Levy Bot that would explain engine analysis
This was so helpful! I’ve often wondered about the engine’s recommendations, and now I understand why.
I appreciate your videos Levi, you explain things very well, it’s easy to follow. Some Masters just rip off lines so fast, it’s impossible to follow. Thanks for all your hard work.
2:28 that is why computer says it is a 'good' move levy xD
This honestly makes me feel more confident in myself, thanks Levy :)
Not gonna lie, I saw this video and I was like...does Levy think we are noobs, and then I had the moment of ohhhh wait...ohhh I am a noob when I was clicking through lol
As a begging player, every time I search a 'How To', Gotham already has it covered. Thank you!
The way you speak, the way you teach, the way you express with gestures are the reasons that I'm daily coming back to your channel. You are a great teacher of the CHESS.
Should have titled it "Engine Roast"instead , love the vids levy
The funny thing is I’ll have 95 score games with multiple blunders and missed wins by virtue of the fact that I made only the easy, natural moves in an endgame that lasted an eternity.
i don't even play chess but I'm watching this.. what am i doing with my life
You should start chess then!
This helps so much. these are the kind of videos where you actually learn.
Love it. Keep up vids like this
Unlike arrogat and toxic gm nakamura
The very first time I got a brilliant move cap was a few months back and I was really happy with that game.
That thumbnail is visually pleasing
The last time I was this early Levy wasn’t an IM
Why does everyone spell it wrong
@@Le_g3nd Idk
@@Le_g3nd probably attack on titan
bruh Razorlike got banned for cheating lol
Even Levy himself can't play that good lol, obvious cheater
It felt really cynical, but when I saw that accuracy I thought 'What if he is a cheater?'. Kinda sad really!
Sorry but nobody plays 99.5 accuracy... pretty obvious cheater
@@AfterthoughtTV that's not true lol, if your opponent messes up it isn't hard. I'm 1300 and I've had >99 accuracy if my opponent blunders early. Of course, as you get higher, your opponent is better, but so are you- if you know opening theory and your opponent blunders the knight, as razorlike's opponent did, then it is by no means impossible to get 99.5 accuracy without using any computer at all.
@@AfterthoughtTV thats not how it works, if the opponent makes a ton of blunders then 99 percent accuracy isnt cheating, but if the opponent played at an 80 percent accuracy then its likely cheating
Thank you, Levy for a nice video. I was very hopeful at the beginning when you said that this video would help me analyze opening, midgame and endgame phases. Instead the video was mostly about uncovering the engine's thought process. That is also good to realize and your video helped me see things differently, but this video was not a structured tutorial on how to analyze my games. Well sure, there were things to take away from each game: first game -- develop pieces, second game -- do not leave your pieces as a target, third game -- know the opening, anticipate pawn brakes.
But still, this is analysis of the games. This did not teach us to analyze our games. This was you analyzing games.
Nonetheless love what you do, great content.
I agree, maybe the title should've been different
I just finished the analysis of a game I lost online. It was my first. real analysis, with written notes and so on.
It took me like 3 hours, but for the first time I feel I really learned something from a lost match: I made the same error 3 times.
Thanks for this video that inspired me and also gave reeeeally helpful hints and tips about the topic.
I promised myself I'll always analyze every game I play!
After watching this I played a game with 93.5% accuracy
Nice!
after watching I played 100% accuracy and spit on who I played.
joke don't sue me
Day 6: Of requesting Levy to cover opposite coloured bishop endgames.
I'd much rather do 2 bishops vs king and bishop and knight vs king cuz opposite coloured bishop endings will nearly always end in a draw
king and knight vs king mating patterns!
U can't mate with just a knight and king
It's impossible
@@lw9492 yea I was joking but thx lol
Razor like was cheating in that game lmao. His account is closed for fair play
yup, just noticed that xD he cheated on a ton of games too
I wanted him to be legit, because then we would've had another magnus on our hands.. seems it's not gonna happen
8:05 Thanks for that. I thought something was wrong with me when the moves that put me into game-winning positions were being analyzed as blunders, but it’s some much-needed perspective.
This makes me feel better ,today i played my first brilliant move and after i saw the analysis i was shocked ,i had 3 innacuracies,0 mistakes,0 blunders,0 missed wins and 1 brilliant move ,it felt so good that i did a screenshot ,i was so proud
I Mean Brilliant Moves Not That Hard
I actually never got the "legendary double !! Briliant move" :))))
I got it ones in a crazy Grand Prix attack, sacrificing a ton of material to checkmate, it was really nice
I got it once when I was under attack and found a move with the queen that defended a few things at once
For 1000 rated players, that was a very well-played game
"hopefully not THREE times"
Me on my 10th repetition: :'D
dude, honestly same
?
the moves at the bottom are the worst moves (that are not mistakes, or blunders) @5:50 the computer is not recommending that rc1 is the best it but bc5 and the continuation for the best moves are the little ones ones underneath it.
23:05 What about the move bishop to b4? Bishop can be taken by rook but then loses rook to queen; if white threatens bishop with pawn, trade rook at e1; if they move their rook queen to a5 to remove fork but still protect the bishop; if they move pawn to c5, still queen to a5 protecting the bishop and also threatening a queen trade if they allow the rook to be taken
yay now i can act like im a master and tell my friends they “blunder” and offer them to take back but actually make them blunder so gg.
I learned a lot. Might pick up chess
It's a great game, I recommend it.
Razorlike played half their pieces on their board and did like an absolute savage
yeah it seriously looked like he was using an engine and just not selecting the best move unless the alternative was weak xD. but if he is 2300, we have to trust.
@@christor2907 thats either the best game of his life,or he used engine..I m 2250 on chess.com,never played a flawless game like this.i always have like an inaccuracy (short games dont count ofc,its easy to play flawless if the game ends in 9 moves)
@@RayVitoles I'm only a 950 and played last night against a 900 who got a 99.0 with 0 inaccuracies/mistakes/blunders. I was actually proud the game lasted 38 moves, and that I only had 3 inaccuracies and 1 mistake; 61 percent is great for me.
@@basebob05 its not about the accuracy..Getting 99.0%+ accuracy is not impossible by any means.Its about the absence ofinaccuracies/mistakes/blunders.Even top players will miss sth
@@RayVitoles they got banned for cheating
Best video on game analysis that I have ever watched. Great vid.
At 28:19 you dont wanna do a queen trade because you can straight up trap the black queen with pawn to b5. Queen has nowhere to run