Fujifilm USA Binoculars “101”: Roof vs. Porro

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 січ 2016
  • Thom Calabro, director of marketing and product development with Fujifilm’s Optical Devices Division, introduces Part Two of our "Binoculars 101" video series.
    If you watched Part One of our video series, you know that Fujifilm produces a full line of binoculars boasting high optical performance and reliability for a vast range of applications. To help you further determine what kind of binoculars fit your needs, today we’re going to talk about the two main types of binoculars: Roof Prism and Porro Prism.
    Part One: The Basics • Fujifilm USA Binocular...
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 10

  • @spacecatboy2962
    @spacecatboy2962 7 років тому +9

    FINALLY A GOOD EXPLINATION OF THE DIFFERENCE

    • @fujinonbinoculars1772
      @fujinonbinoculars1772  7 років тому

      Glad you thought so!

    • @spacecatboy2962
      @spacecatboy2962 7 років тому

      FujinonBinoculars
      i got frustrated watching these yahoos on here explain porro and roof and all they could say is that one was slimmer and more compact than the other......but i wanted to know which one gives the best quality picture, so after seeing this i think porro is the way to go in the lower cost models

  • @sahmadi1000
    @sahmadi1000 6 років тому +2

    Such a beautiful presentation comming from someone who is doing optics for a living. Thank you for explaining these two technologies so well. Now i am beginning to see why some binoculars cost $20 and others cost $1000. Thanks

  • @alvinfreeman8838
    @alvinfreeman8838 Рік тому

    Very good information.

  • @catnipyfy
    @catnipyfy 6 років тому +1

    Yes indeed - a really helpful video - thanks very much

  • @milospopovic6978
    @milospopovic6978 4 роки тому +2

    So,which one is better ?

    • @kombasanpracka
      @kombasanpracka 4 роки тому +5

      Mid range Porro gives you the same image quality as a higher range (more expensive) roof binocular.
      On the other hand porro is bulkier and heavier.
      Therefore roof binoculars are a better choice for tourists, hikers who prefere lower weight and low light performance is not the priority.
      Porro is better for hunters who do need a good low light performance and don't mind a little more weight to carry.
      However porro binoculars are really sensitive to drops and hits as their prisms can misalign pretty easily - than you'll end up with double vision.

  • @CompetentSalesUSA
    @CompetentSalesUSA 7 років тому

    Poro prism binoculars are much more durable and rugged than the roof prism binoculars. I disagree with you.

    • @DGFishRfine1
      @DGFishRfine1 3 роки тому

      They can be. Certainly, it is much easier to build a tough porro than a tough roof prism binocular. However, there are phenomenally durable roof prism binoculars. Good examples would be Fraser's M25s. You can literally run over those with a truck and they'll work fine-gyroscope and all. They do, however, cost $4000.
      Fujinon's stabiscope is still a porro. I'm pretty sure you could also run those over with a truck.
      I own very tough roofs and very tough porros. These days, it really does just come down to how they're put together.