Best 10 grand piano VST comparison

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 лип 2024
  • 🎹🎶 Please, like and subscribe to support the channel!
    Comparison of the virtual piano plugins by playing F. Chopin - Etude 5:
    0:00 Embertone - Walker 1955 Concert D
    2:04 Imperfect samples - Steinway Walnut Grand
    4:04 8DIO - 1990 Studio Grand
    6:02 C. Bechstein - Digital Grand
    8:01 Garritan - CFX Concert Grand
    9:59 Soniccouture - Hammersmith Pro
    11:58 Impact Soundworks - Pearl Concert Grand
    13:56 VI Labs - Ravencroft 275
    15:54 Wavesfactory - Mercury
    17:57 Spectrasonics - Keyscape
    ------------------------------------------------------
    Please, donate to support the channel and video creation :)
    paypal.me/leotimofeev?country...
    www.buymeacoffee.com/tim.studio

КОМЕНТАРІ • 54

  • @ritchxmusic
    @ritchxmusic 5 місяців тому +2

    GREAT listen through thanks for making that. First two stood out to me, completely. Loved them!

  • @hosseinjavidiniroomand
    @hosseinjavidiniroomand 2 роки тому +2

    Nice and beautiful. Because inspiring and useful for me as a professional composer. Many thanks🙏🌹❤

  • @DlmlZ
    @DlmlZ 2 роки тому +13

    Great comparison! Thanks a lot for sharing. Well I am a piano maker by profession! And if it comes to classical music Steinway is and probably always will be the leading instrument, while I see Bechstein following straight close to that path. Bechstein has a bit more of transparency. Both instruments are very rich in harmonics. Yamaha is great for Jazz and modern Pop music but it never convinced me, when it comes to classical music.
    So here is my favourite list.
    1. Walker 1955
    2. C. Bechstein
    3. Soniccouture Steinway Model D
    4. Imperfect samples - Steinway Walnut Grand
    5. Garritan CFX Yamaha
    6. 8DIO - 1990 Studio Grand Yamaha C7
    7. Wavesfactory - Mercury
    8. VI Labs - Ravencroft 275
    9. Spectrasonics Keyscape
    10. Impact Soundworks- Pearl Concert Grand
    However, great video and much fun to watch! Love it! Cheers DimiZ

  • @JoseVGavila
    @JoseVGavila 2 роки тому +3

    Nice work, your 5th subscriber here!

  • @ptalley316
    @ptalley316 Рік тому +3

    Wow!! Love the Steinway:)

  • @GiorgioDeAngelisPiano
    @GiorgioDeAngelisPiano 2 роки тому +2

    Interesting review congrats

  • @DeAnimeAPartitura
    @DeAnimeAPartitura Рік тому +2

    I love your video!! i was looking for something like this since I have the IS Pearl vst and I wanted to upgrade to another better vst. I have to say that the Pearl version you used to make this video was v2.0 and developers fixed a pedal issue in that version, but messed up everything else, like harmonics, resonance and quality in general. That's why I stayed on v1.0, because I value harmonics and resonance over the other features. I think the harmonics is the piano sound's heart (that's just my opinion) and I find the Stainway Walnut Grand a nice next step from a Pearl Grand Concert. Nice video!

    • @tim.studiorecords120
      @tim.studiorecords120  Рік тому

      Thanks for your comment! Yes the harmonics definitely define the character of the instrument. For me Pearl grand fits more as a pop piano. After trying many plugins, I'd put Garritan CFX, NI Noire and VI Ravenscroft above all in playability for classics. Of course, with the proper settings :) VSL pianos are top in sound, but they arent that optimized in memory usage.

  • @leoartplay
    @leoartplay 2 роки тому +9

    It is difficult to compare unequal things. That's why, among the samples of Yamaha pianos: 8DIO the reverb makes some of the sound disappear; Garritan: excellent sound, with a lot of body and presence in the lows, mids and highs; IS Pearl: also an excellent sample, with a lot of sharpness in all the tracks; Spectrasonics: good, but I found the stereo a little over the top. My biggest surprise is with Bechstein, which I didn't know about. Excellent sample.

    • @tim.studiorecords120
      @tim.studiorecords120  2 роки тому

      That's right. There are several factors which should be taken into account, like playability.. The "Default" instrument sounds aren't always good especially for playing classic, so in this comparison I added some reverbs or other tweaks. Might also do with default sounds some time.

  • @richardsalay3777
    @richardsalay3777 4 місяці тому +1

    Wow I am so surprised!..Anyway thnx for this video!:)..In my studio EMBERTONE and BECHSTEIN sounds most natural in mids..they are full of sound and dynamic like a real piano..and for this style of music are these two the best for me!..

  • @cristianrodriguez5112
    @cristianrodriguez5112 2 роки тому +8

    The Walker !!!!!!

  • @thedailyremedy968
    @thedailyremedy968 Рік тому +2

    Garritan number one from me with this piece of music.

  • @robinfrenzy
    @robinfrenzy 9 місяців тому +1

    For me it's really a matter of preference. None of them are objectively bad, they all sound different. The main difference I notice is the spacial aspect or how close to me they feel, with the Walker 1955 sounding very close and intimate (like if my head was under the lid) and the Sounnicouture Steinway D being very distant. The CFX and Ravenscroft have more of a concert hall sound, and the IS Steinway sounds more like a studio recording, but the bass resonates a bit like the lid isn't fully open.
    I personnally like the CFX the most, but because I'm used to Yamahas. The Bechstein sounded good too, a bit brighter.

  • @DiamondTrack
    @DiamondTrack Рік тому +1

    Thats one of the best comparisons available! I really like the CFX, Embertone Walker and the Imperfect Samples Walnut quite a bit. Pearl is also maybe interesting for Pop productions. Which Pianos do you like the best and which is the best to play? Btw. do you like the Kawai VPC-1? I waited really long for a successor to buy my first Piano controller but a VPC-2 never seems to appear sadly :D So maybe i'm also getting the already quite old but nice VPC-1 one day. :)

  • @robertgrzelewski
    @robertgrzelewski 3 місяці тому

    First of all, I love seeing your plugin comparisons, thank you. Your speed curve setting for Keyscape what i can see in the video is for the standard curve in Vpc1? I'm asking because I have this plug-in and there's always something that doesn't seem right to me. I will try to copy your setting :)

  • @bdotstanley
    @bdotstanley Рік тому +4

    The Embertone one sounds the best to me. Though that comes with a cost as the library is nearly the size of the entire Keyscape suite lol

  • @helisoma
    @helisoma Рік тому +3

    i have the original Garritan 10ft Steinway Concert Grand emulation...from 2010...they searched the world for the best room acoustics and ended up in a bank building in NYC used a crane to lift the piano that was specifically hand picked by Steinway & Sons up seven stories then spent a full week recording with i think 21 microphones a pro pianist hitting the keys with different velocities etc...the amount of effort that went into it (the whole process took 8 years) is incredible. It's naturally my personal favorite. I think some of these emulations use fine pianos but where they fall short is room acoustics/sound design.

    • @tim.studiorecords120
      @tim.studiorecords120  Рік тому

      Hi, yes every sampled virtual piano is limited by the room acoustics. I think for classic music, Garritan CFX and VSL piano libraries are currently best.

  • @DJKLProductions
    @DJKLProductions 6 місяців тому +2

    I think a few important and really good piano libraries are missing here in my opinion: VSL's and Pianoteq's grand pianos!

  • @Sooul._
    @Sooul._ 9 місяців тому +1

    I think I should try the East West Quantum Leap Pianos 👑

  • @mdkgr
    @mdkgr Рік тому +1

    I bought a Roland FP-30X to finally learn the piano at 28 (not trying to produce music etc.). In your opinion, which is the best plugin to take the Roland’s sound to the next level? Just started learning about all the available plugins, but I heard about Garritan CFX, Keyscape’s C7, Ravenscroft 275, Pianoteq (to mention a few), are great. What’s your opinion?
    Also, trying to load Garritan CFX on a Roland FP-30X connected to a desktop PC but I can feel the latency affecting my playing. I can around 2 ms latency but it still feels “slow”. Don’t know if my brain is making this up. How do you load the plugin (VST, Standalone)? How can someone “eliminate” latency, to replicate the feel of a real piano?
    What is the most responsive (lowest latency) plugin in your experience? Maybe Pianoteq?
    Currently using Reaper as my choice of DAW (tried Ableton too), I’ve set the Sample Rate to the maximum of 384 kHz that my Chord Mojo DAC supports, which lowered the latency instantly, and now I’m experimenting with the Buffer size, around 128-256 samples, keeping in mind how my system responds, so as to avoid cracks and pops. I’ve also got a Ryzen 3600 system, which handles all this pretty fine I’d say. Still feels kinda slow.

    • @tim.studiorecords120
      @tim.studiorecords120  Рік тому +1

      Hi! Garritan CFX, Keyscape C7, Ravenscroft 275, Pianoteq are all good. It depends on your sound tastes and feeling during the play. I personally like Garritan CFX and Ravenscroft plugins in terms of sound and playability. Also, Production grand sounds very good. VSL piano libraries are believed to be one of the best sampled libraries, but they are "heavy" on memory and also cost.

    • @tim.studiorecords120
      @tim.studiorecords120  Рік тому +1

      To reduce the latency, you should use a proper audio driver like ASIO (for windows). Also, you can try using an external audio interface.

    • @davidgarrett4327
      @davidgarrett4327 6 місяців тому

      Lmao, i am LITERALLY in your situation, the only difference being age

  • @DihelsonMendonca
    @DihelsonMendonca 2 місяці тому +1

    💥 The Grandeur put all these on the pocket. While it is not here, Keyscape is the most realistic. 🎉❤

  • @yuranovch5
    @yuranovch5 5 місяців тому

    Second is the best from all of these

  • @alexandervolkov89291
    @alexandervolkov89291 4 місяці тому +1

    I can tell you that Garritan CFX is the only VSTi that can truly sound like a real piano. A friend of mine secretly recorded Chopin and Liszt with it and nobody could imagine that it was not an acoustic recording.

    • @heisenbergwalter3363
      @heisenbergwalter3363 3 місяці тому

      if the only criterion is realism, the steinway walnut is at least as good as garritan. But Garritan is much more playable. Anyway, they are all samples pianos, so what we hear is the sound of a real piano, you can trick people with all of them. So the criterion to evaluate them, is more playability.

    • @alexandervolkov89291
      @alexandervolkov89291 3 місяці тому +1

      @@heisenbergwalter3363 Garritan is the only sample library that can trick melomaniacs AND sound engineers. A friend of mine recorded a complete classical album with it and nobody ever thought it was not a real grand piano. No other VST is capable of doing that, also not VSL Fazioli, Steinway Walnut library is no compare at all.
      Walnut sounds over saturated, pedalling is unnatural and as with all Kontakt piano libraries, legato is unnatural as well. As a sound engineer I wished I could help Garritan to go to the other level and record legendary piano's like Chopin's own Pleyel grand piano or Horowitz's CD95 Steinway.

  • @TheNetzspannung
    @TheNetzspannung Рік тому

    Very interesting comparison, thank you. Did you use a single MIDI file for each plugin or play each one individually? Sorry for the noob question...

    • @hier3094
      @hier3094 Рік тому +1

      I think it's a single midi file

  • @anatol1204
    @anatol1204 6 місяців тому

    Nice..What keyboard you use ?

    • @tim.studiorecords120
      @tim.studiorecords120  6 місяців тому

      I use Kawai VPC1.

    • @anatol1204
      @anatol1204 6 місяців тому

      @@tim.studiorecords120 hmm.. right I found an MP 11 SE light used in the price of the VPC (new) and I don t know if it's worth it.What do you think ?

    • @tim.studiorecords120
      @tim.studiorecords120  6 місяців тому

      @@anatol1204 I have not tried that model, but it seems to be a nice level up from VPC1 (updated piano action plus digital piano function)

    • @anatol1204
      @anatol1204 6 місяців тому

      @@tim.studiorecords120 thanks for the answer..👍

  • @Tarkus_H
    @Tarkus_H Рік тому +1

    My personal favorite is Native Instruments' The Maverick.

  • @simbaking6338
    @simbaking6338 5 місяців тому +1

    No Pianoteq??

  • @mawot_music
    @mawot_music 10 місяців тому +1

    walker

  • @anatol1204
    @anatol1204 6 місяців тому

    I don t like Garitan it has strange mids but good playability

    • @kristoradion
      @kristoradion 3 місяці тому +1

      So true, it sounds like toy, but why people praise it 😮

  • @monster-tr7qh
    @monster-tr7qh 2 роки тому +7

    #1 Walker 1955 Concert D 0:08
    #2 Keyscape 18:00
    #3 C. Bechstein - Digital Grand 6:04
    For me.

  • @DomzTunes
    @DomzTunes Рік тому +4

    1. 0:00 Embertone - Walker 1955 Concert D
    2. 8:01 Garritan - CFX Concert Grand
    3. 17:57 Spectrasonics - Keyscape
    Honorable mention: 6:02 C. Bechstein - Digital Grand (This actually sounds amazing!)

    • @jskim2510
      @jskim2510 Рік тому +1

      Cfx did really sound good. i was just minding my own business and listening to this video, and the two sounds that got me was CFx and pearl sound

  • @Azfurita
    @Azfurita 10 місяців тому +2

    Imperfect samples - Steinway Walnut Grand its the best , Wavesfactory - Mercury the worst by far

  • @siddharthasingh8004
    @siddharthasingh8004 Рік тому +19

    keyscape is the worst by far

    • @justinw72ify
      @justinw72ify 6 місяців тому +3

      That is no where near the best setting in keyscape they should have used the bright setting

    • @x-dsemusica.a8750
      @x-dsemusica.a8750 6 місяців тому +1

      Tune your ears, The harmony and melody is The most clarity

    • @mind_money_morphology
      @mind_money_morphology 6 місяців тому +2

      Keyscape is great by far…
      - It has the most dynamic range
      - Great clarity
      - Best depth by far
      - Tape compression but not baked in so it’s optional (tape noise is pleasant to the ear)
      - brilliant consistency