Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024 - PERFORMANCE Test & What To EXPECT - All The Details
Вставка
- Опубліковано 13 жов 2024
- A test of Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024 in the Tech Alpha build. This is not intended to be a benchmark performance test, instead the focus was to offer insight into how MSFS2024 runs during the test build.
PC Specs
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
RTX 4090
96gb RAM
Thumbnail screenshots by
BasedRaccoon
ukaka5656
P1zzarelli
Music by Epidemic Sound
Wow, the immediate LOD improvement is crazy.
Yeah, that's thanks to the multithreading in 2024
What is LDO?
@@arride4590 "level of detail" specifically how the level of details of models change depending on distance.
I have a pretty mid range PC. RTX 2080, 8core 9th gen Intel processor. And 32Gb DDR3. 2024 works better than 2020 when it comes to cpu usage and utilizes up to 100 percent of my GPU when on the ground. This is a great sign for performance since the “limited by main thread” doesn’t exist anymore. I ran the same settings on 2024 as I did on 2020, 2024 runs just as well! In other words. If your PC can run 2020 then you can run 2024!
if thats mid then my pc is a potato
I have lower specs but 2020 ran much better around 50-60 fps no dlss or fg. On 2024 i got around 20-30 fps. All in ultra preset.@@basicthunder
@@basicthunderit is mid tier, rx480 is basically the bare minimum for modern gaming on 1080.
1440 and up rtx 3060ti is the minimum.
@@basicthunder That is mid tier, might've been top of the line over half a decade ago but not anymore.
2:18 Regarding RAM. 4K Ultra with nothing else open in the background, I peaked at 25GB overall system RAM usage. It was generally between 14GB and 20GB depending on the environment.
The cars driving on top of the bridge @1:40 haha! Looks great so far and I'm sure there are all sorts of little things like this that they're working on for the Beta
The new lighting and seasons are pretty amazing how much better it makes this look. Also, swinging out of Portland and just going to another place on earth with no loading time? WHAT!?!? Pretty amazing stuff, what a time to be alive.
Microsoft need to make world Sim, Adding Train sim, Farm sim, Truck Sim, Flight Sim, Make it real, be cool as your flying Around, you look down and See someone Working on a Farm, Looking down and seeing Trucks driving around the streets and roads all across the world, same as trains crossing the landscapes and cities of the world. "WORLD SIMULATIONS"
Why are you using frame Gen? Horrible oversight as it misconstrues every aspect of performance
Performance test should not be run with frame generation ON.
I love the vids from ObsidianAnt so much but I have to agree I was very confused ab this choice lol
Also, a word to VR pilots, Frame Gen will do nothing for you.
Yup, as soon as I saw frame gen was on I stopped watching
Then he must use the developer mode, its shows fps with no FG...
his cpu and ram speed sure has issues filling that gpu to 100%, he could have saved a few bucks buying a 4080 or even a 4070ti super. ram speed sure has a huge impact @4k. almost 10 fps gain from 5600 going to 6400 and 2 fps going from 6400 to 7200.
I've seen many videos out there but none of them shows locations with the nice ground cover (tall grass, rocks and diversification) we saw in the trailers. Is that feature deliberately disabled in alpha?
From what I've understood, yes it was disabled, at least for most of the world. Same goes for photogrammetry in most places.
I was super impressed with the performance of the alpha test on my Ryzen 9/4070 laptop. The sim runs better than 2020, with more details and graphical features. I was running at high and getting great frame rates. The dlss implementation is much better than 2020 with no blurry glass cockpits.
The extra detail in the coastline where i live was massive compared to 2020. very good definition to cliffs. I did notice some farm buildings still looking like business properties, and missing churches, but this may not be the launch dataset.
Anyway, all round impressed with the test version.
You enable "Dynamic Setting" its like AutoFPS and drop TLOD and OLOD to maximize framerate if you dont cap a target. There is some interplay between monitor refresh rate and dynamic settings and target frame rate.
This new camera mode is impressively fast. Makes you feel like Superman exploring the planet.
Congrats on the 4090. I remember years ago on elite dangerous videos you had a 980gt(?) i think was. Always wanted to donate so you could upgrade!!!
I found that the performance was soo much better than MSFS2020. I'm running i7 13700KF, RTX 4070 & 32Gb 5200mt p/s ram, the performance and quality was so much better. Out of the box, the sim set itself to ultra on everything and gave me a consistent 60fps!
Main thread performance doesn't seem to be much of an issue from what I experienced from the Tech alpha. I'd be very interested in how the devs would be handing the performance of upcoming Intel Arrow Lake though, considering all but the flagship processor will lack hyperthreading as Intel believe the chips would be fast enough to process requests and increase power efficiency.
While I match or surpass all the recommended specs, I'm still planning on one month of GamePass purely to test out performance, streaming data and so on. Official specs are usually off but it does appear to be much better than I expected.
For me, the loading times for a single flight never seemed overly long. The initial load, from starting MSFS2020 to the main menu, that's another story. How has that been with the 2024 alpha?
I have a faster system than featured so I'm happy you're getting around 80fps at 4k, Play 1440p ultra wide so I expect maybe slightly better performance.
Also I hope that it's possible to save that streamed data to an selectable sizable cache so downloading isn't constant, I have a 2gbps FTTP connection but still, being able to save data already used would be an boon.
Did they raise the height limit? I saw when you were flying around with the free camera, you went higher then I remember you could
"ISPs with data caps hate this 1 simple trick!" ... or... love? Can charge for?
Has the Alpha test ended? I was able to load up the sim yesterday but today it's no longer loading - it's stuck on the loading screen video. I went to xbox insider hub and its not there. Can you confirm?
wow great analysis on everything from wi fi bandwidth to cpu core usage my alpha looked like crap long times to load in and blurry textures up to last minute in areas I blame crappy hotel internet
I'd be curious to see what the comparison between 2020 and 2024 is in performance
Is multi monitor support there in MSFS 2024 - like a 3 monitor setup in 2020 ?
I would love to zoom in like that anywhere in the world, but to play a survival type game.
11:37 The intro to the movie The Shining, vibes.
VRAM usage seems to be significant higher than MSFS 2020, that's bad news for those with 12GB cards and lower.
Not for 1080 or 1440p high, this video is 4k ultra
Like with alpha 2020 they show off whats possible and then reduce at launch.
Can you do Alaska or Northern Canada? In FS2020, photogrammetry there was shit, even near big cities like Anchorage, making any bushflight there kinda not worth it. Even Asobo's own Alaska bushflights went over regions that looked like FS2004
Tech alpha ended today 😅
I am really curious how fligh simulator 2024 will be run on xbox and how details will be downgraded against pc version
It definitely runs much much better than 2020 on my 5800x3d with 32gb RAM and 5800XT. You can tell 2024 actually uses all cores. Very little stutters, and overall frame rates higher and much more consistent, and this is in ultra settings at 2k ultra wide. And the alpha feels much more refined than the 2020 beta did by a long shot. It should be a much better product when officially released unlike 2020. It's the first time in 30 years of using MSFS where the new version of MSFS has actually ran significantly better than the old one.
Seems very heavy on the GPU 😮. Wonder how the 5080 or 5090 will perform.
are we going to be able to walk around on consoles?
Curious how this will be in VR my 3080 is great performance in VR in 2020
men I can't wait for this 🙂
Would love to know the FPS with a 4080 Super and a Ryzen 7800X3D. Probably no where near your FPS with the 4090..
If they don't make a carnival cruise liner that can fly, that is a 100% missed opportunity lol.
I can't comprehend how everything except 9 GB of data is streamed from the web.
Thats probably why ideal settings are 64 gb of ram lol.
running a 5800x3d and a 3080... i need a new pc... the faster your are flying at low altitute the more necessary is it to dont have any microstutters or missing frames... its very notacable
What's going on with all the ships??
Your GPU has more memory than my whole system including the GPU lol
So much traffic on the river Seine. Better get these bridges open
5:05 that cruise liner -> lol
07:09 that cruise liners -> Hold my beer!
It runs with a 4090 frame generation and dlss. Okay
dlss+quality at least in 1920x1080 is crap.
TAA is the way to go.
And the rig for this test, 99 per cent people don´t have it.
Any testing in VR?
I hope this game gets FSR 3.1 frame gen support.
Imagine turning this into a first person shooter - for lols :)
Thanks for the video
Why dont they just sync the game with live traffick cams too so you can see real cars and pedestrians
100mbit/s maybe for what is to come in the next few years.
There is little chance I can play this on a 4mb connection :(
Multiplayer has to rebuild
This simulator looks BONKORS 🎉🎉🎉🎉
Please don't censor this post, as it's imperative that your viewers know this FACT about Meta VR devices:
A cautionary tale for current and prospective Meta Quest VR headset owners (for sim'ing or gaming):
I'm on day 8 of Meta holding my Quest headsets hostage. I've been using Oculus/Quest devices from the day they started making them (10 years ago?), and I have not been required to give my date of birth to Meta in all this time. But they recently demanded my DOB under threat of disabling my Quests, and they made good on that threat 8 days ago. Meta can metaphorically brick your headsets, any time they want, and for any reason they want, and you will have no defense against it.
Conclusion: Think carefully before you BUY anything from Meta; The thing you BUY will not be yours.
why dont you want to give your dob? sounds silly to me. otherwise not a fan of anything meta at all
You are aware that US law regarding social media forces companies to ask you your birthday in order to determine if you're a minor or not, right? The Quest has social aspects built in and this must follow these rules. Also, you ever consider just *using a fake birthday* like pretty much everyone else?
@@wout123100 You've missed the point. Meta can literally steal your devices from you, FOR ANY REASON they want. Re-read what I wrote.
I actually created an account with Twitter (another societal poison social media site), specifically to start spreading the word about Meta VR devices, and I was fine giving my DOB to them, because it was required at the time of sign-up. But I signed up for both FB and Meta accounts years ago, exclusively for Oculus and Quest device usage, and no DOB was required. But now DOB is mandatory, and they've disabled my headsets because I'm objecting to it.
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
whats up with the big yachts / ships at 7:11 lol
Am I the only one who thinks that the cities look absolutely horrible right now?
No. Its horrible.
ran great at ultra settings on my old i5 10600 rtx 3090 48gb ram. gpu 75% cpu 58%
this is different game :)
My WiFi is 133mbps so I should be ok for the game
All those ships in Paris, that's in Seine. I know, its a terrible joke, be nice lol!
5:06 lol
VR is the only details that matter
Agree. How is the VR for msfs 2024 so far?
@@arride4590 have ask Asobo cos even though I had tech demo access it wasn’t supported. To ask Asobo you have have to ask content creators like OA….
👍
Run's as expected on a rig which is about as powerful as they come....cool.....
looks 1% better than mfs2020 tbh not impressed
Fortunately, you're not obligated to buy it.
But you will.
@@imacmill LOL
The game will be released on November 19th and on October 14th what we still have is an alpha?! Deja vu.
I'm underwhelmed. Not Microsofts fault. I just was expecting more. Drone simulator.
It's hardly the finished version, don't be such a Debby downer.
what were you expecting? I mean anything more is just unrealistic expectation. You can't have the same leap forward like last time, or else you simulate the real entire world in 3 iterations
We do not care. 👍
@@burgadahz17 I bet that you will care when you realise the absolute dog shit they are marketing as steak.
It's called "slewing" and msfs has had that since forever ago, like the 90s
You're at the 0,5% potential users with that specs... Not the real sample tbh
He literally said that he knows not everyone will have his specs, and will do a full comparison on lower machines on full release. What did you want him to do - throttle his PC?
Then find another video.... He's not going to build a bunch of mid pc's to satisfy every single person that whines.... You can compare it to your hardware, make your judgement, and move on. For me, he's not far off of my PC (4080 super and 64gb of ram instead of 96gb, but I have a 7800X3D), so it's nice to see what his can do.
Or you know, just complain because every video on UA-cam isn't perfectly tailored to you... We're on a video about graphics testing for a simulation that isn't even out yet. I can guarantee you that this isn't your "0.5% of potential users" and this is relevant to more viewers than you think.
everyone is saying the game runs better than 2020, the only demanding part of the game is the RAM usage. so you can compare with it until you get the chance to test it.