Delivering on the Future of Submarine Warfare

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 лип 2024
  • Please join the Center for Strategic and International Studies and the United States Naval Institute (USNI) for a Maritime Security Dialogue featuring a discussion with Rear Admiral Charles Richard and Rear Admiral Michael Jabaley.
    A Discussion with:
    Rear Admiral Charles A. Richard, USN
    Director, Undersea Warfare Division (N97)
    Rear Admiral Michael E. Jabaley, USN
    Program Executive Officer for Submarines
    Moderated by:
    Dr. Kathleen Hicks
    Senior Vice President; Henry A. Kissinger Chair; and
    Director; International Security Program, CSIS
    The Maritime Security Dialogue brings together CSIS and USNI, two of the nation's most respected non-partisan institutions. The series is intended to highlight the particular challenges facing the Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard, from national level maritime policy to naval concept development and program design. Given budgetary challenges, technological opportunities, and ongoing strategic adjustments, the nature and employment of U.S. maritime forces are likely to undergo significant change over the next ten to fifteen years. The Maritime Security Dialogue provides an unmatched forum for discussion of these issues with the nation's maritime leaders.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 41

  • @popey129
    @popey129 6 років тому +7

    Glad to see such intelligent leaders in the navy.

  • @jamesjabaley9993
    @jamesjabaley9993 4 роки тому +1

    Deep gratitude for making our country safe for now and for years to come. Thanks so much for the candid discussion.

  • @bchristian79
    @bchristian79 7 років тому +3

    i am excited to hear about the replacement of the steam propulsion to electronic. I'm surprised how openly the Navy speaks about it.

  • @ducaleadan39
    @ducaleadan39 Рік тому

    Thanks

  • @vegass04
    @vegass04 7 років тому +3

    Submarines are our enduring advantage that we hold over our adversaries, dare I say enemies. And these new investments are just gonna widen that gap. I say invest even more in submarines, take the money from aircraft carrier and build SSN(X) in 2030, invest heavily in next generation strike capability (replacement for Tomahawk and next gen anti ship missile) which should be at least supersonic if not hypersonic. Go guys go...

  • @generalsirc2615
    @generalsirc2615 5 років тому

    great video! I am very glad to see the navy seems to be on the ball when it comes to SSBNs. in my opinion the SSBN is probably the most important weapon the USA has! and I am very very happy to see that we are moving to electric motors that will help to reduce a subs noise.

    • @RedRider1600
      @RedRider1600 3 роки тому

      Electric Boats is the name of a ship builder.
      It's a General Dynamics company.

  • @anthonyburke5656
    @anthonyburke5656 2 роки тому

    No one who can think, would credit survival of the Cold War to anything but Ballistic Submarines as a deterrent. Totally agree to not have that deterrent is to gamble without real prospect of winning.

  • @ducaleadan39
    @ducaleadan39 Рік тому

    When Ever you Zre Talking Try To Avoid Probaganda You Creat. When Ever We Can Reach To Agree Something You May Creat Conflict . Talks Conflict, Discussion , Conflict next Other Discussion Resulted Conflict All This Progress Is Yours . You Don't Need Progress Forward And You Don't Need To Shotdown . No Other Three Parts Can In Between.

  • @juanalvarez2142
    @juanalvarez2142 5 років тому +1

    Due to the fact that we do evolve from the biggest creature in life it self. So what I'm doing is absorbing anxiety from all human life and covering into positive energy. And thinking peaceful pure love my self love no danger. Source of self confidence it takes me about two minutes to put it in prospective

  • @voglerlake
    @voglerlake 6 років тому +1

    Thank you, great talk.
    Can the Ohio fleet be handed over, as each are decommissioned, to a group like the NSF for use as research platforms?
    This could help keep retired submariners employed, keep the boat works supply chain running, and the boats can revolutionize many aspects of global biogeochemical research.
    With this change in mission, the launch tubes can be used as biofuel storage tanks and the reactors can be replaced with a diesels. The subs would be more limited yet would be good enough for research.
    I believe saving the Ohio fleet, by converting them to research vessels, is a once in a generation opportunity for the marine sciences and would keep these great boats and submariners working; working for science.
    Possibly, the Ohio reactors can be used in the new boats. If so, that could take a big bite out of the new boat cost.
    Please do everything that can be done to max out the use of the Ohio fleet; science needs them.
    While I'm at it, I would also like the retired USS JFK used for science as well. Scraping of our old carriers should be stopped. Those carriers can be support vessels for the science sub fleet and space launch pads.

  • @anthonyburke5656
    @anthonyburke5656 2 роки тому

    No discussion of remote piloted vehicles underwater, after all they were pioneered by Naval development, as far as I know the wire guided torpedo was a Norwegian development circa 1940

  • @mr.peter.l.k
    @mr.peter.l.k 3 роки тому

    I listened Carefuly and you focused on constant Problems solution but Development goes from different perspective and that why you all can't see wider view like for an example Elon Musk , so basically you all will stock with maintaining solving Problems only...

  • @juanalvarez2142
    @juanalvarez2142 5 років тому

    I feel completely sane

  • @anthonyburke5656
    @anthonyburke5656 2 роки тому

    Why has the GIUK line been abandoned?

  • @juanalvarez2142
    @juanalvarez2142 5 років тому

    I believe any aquatic submarines etc is or useless due for 1 main reason I would never put any of my brothers and especially sisters in danger as you know what the waters hold.

  • @Ser_Arthur_Dayne
    @Ser_Arthur_Dayne 6 років тому +1

    Wait wait wait.... what you mean, they don't have Romulan Cloaking Devices??? I think we need to have a house meeting, ya'll....

  • @juanalvarez2142
    @juanalvarez2142 5 років тому

    I believe I have said this more than one time if you expect seriousness I absolutely expect no Drugs what so ever.

  • @eleonoraformatoneeszczepan8807
    @eleonoraformatoneeszczepan8807 2 роки тому

    ... Lockheed Martin and Huntington Ingalls Industry ...

  • @vegass04
    @vegass04 7 років тому +1

    Again not one word from the moderators, speakers or public about diesel-electric submarine, or to better say it - the lack of. I think that would be a great advantage to our shrinking fleet..

    • @tradestone100
      @tradestone100 6 років тому

      vegass04 dispite been too stealth, conv sub are very slow and have a little range. Brasil is moving from conventional subs to nuclear tactical subs

    • @runswithbears3517
      @runswithbears3517 6 років тому

      Diesel-electric submarines are more defensively focused, because of their lower speeds and range. Not the sort of boat you'd want as a nation that has lots of interests across the world's oceans. With that said, technology is moving forward very quickly and there's no telling what diesel-electric/air independent submarines can do in the future.

  • @ducaleadan39
    @ducaleadan39 Рік тому

    GO And Agree One Side And Inform Me Or Share With The Last Decision You Reach Lastly

  • @juanalvarez2142
    @juanalvarez2142 5 років тому

    It is a very difficult task to maintain the creatures at ease remeber creatures do not rationalize at all for example what I do is to wrap my total patience as well as pray to myself as some of us know that if Godzilla wakes up then we will well I'll leave it at that. So what I do spiritually is pulled the spirit from all creatures and spiritually tying them in many of all various suns as you know.

  • @anthonyburke5656
    @anthonyburke5656 2 роки тому

    Only took 60+ years to re learn lessons on propulsion the British learnt in respect of Diesel/Electric boats.

  • @juanalvarez2142
    @juanalvarez2142 5 років тому

    If you saw the two magnets right so that was something I was doing for example so that I may see an example but my confidence is in comparison to Air therefore no threat at all.
    If I may say I'm noticing some studering and if I may be quite honest. I suffered from breathing palpitations when I was younger I somehow built self confidence with myself and positive thinking. That is when Tumeric will help. The main issue is the medication for example ask Parsons or any of the scientist about the amount of rat poison raid etc etc I love you

  • @anthonyburke5656
    @anthonyburke5656 2 роки тому

    Sleeper UUV?

  • @ducaleadan39
    @ducaleadan39 Рік тому

    Every Time Be Know You Free And Independent Peaple or There Is No Force . Be Know My Self Is,On Responsibility Which is There Is No Using Nuclear, And I Told More Time Saying Don't Fear my Side , Knowing That You Sre Not Good Peaple . If You Believe That I Told You A False , While I Repeated More Times without Finance. I Don't Know What To Do Ho To Believe There Is No Nuclear usage. Second Topic You Have Talked I Will Talk To You When I Get A Chance . Every Step I Took You Translating Nuclear Program Concerns That Is Abusing My Self Trough Decision You Reach Always. Peace Avoid ConflictIs First Priority In Humanbeing, .

  • @ducaleadan39
    @ducaleadan39 Рік тому

    Now I'm Not Alone So I Can't Talk To You And I Can't Write A Long Massage To Reply You Different Ideas. I Will Talk To You When A Get I Chance.

  • @txm100
    @txm100 3 роки тому +1

    Goverment slides are still the worst.

    • @christophmahler
      @christophmahler 3 роки тому

      "Be the Best"
      Delivering a retaliatory nuclear second strike won't do, anymore - gotta launch _first_ ...