Wizard of Oz and The Oz Books: Everything You Didn't Know | SYFY WIRE

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 186

  • @AdamYJ
    @AdamYJ 6 років тому +154

    "And the second book is where things get weird." Yeah, because the first one was so normal. We're just used to the stuff in the first book because of the movie.

  • @meloniwinter226
    @meloniwinter226 7 років тому +145

    There's a LOT more plot points that are different between the book and the movie for Wizard of Oz other than fighting the spider. Legit 90% of the book is left out.

    • @AtlanticGiantPumpkin
      @AtlanticGiantPumpkin 6 років тому +13

      Meloni Winter The Kalidah, the mouse army, the china dolls, the south witch, those weird Boulder things, and most importantly, Dorothy saving her own ass and none of it is a dream. I'm still pretty about so much of the book being cut to this day. Victor Fleming also directed Gone With the Wind, which is FOUR HOURS LONG!!!! So why he cut so much of the original book is beyond me.

    • @CoopyKat
      @CoopyKat 5 років тому +22

      This is SO true Meloni, there is TONS more in the book, "Chinaland" - a land full of people made of china, the mice that saved the day in the poppy field (not snow)...the tiger/bear creatures...the river incident.......SO much more than what was in the movie. But the movie would have to be in 6 parts to get everything from the book!

    • @amandachwa211
      @amandachwa211 4 роки тому +14

      Also the mountain of hammerheads, the huge hole across the yellow brick road, the witch of the north (who is a different character than Glinda), the witch using wolves, bees and crows to attack Dorothy before resorting to the winged monkeys, the winged monkeys being controlled by the golden cap, etc. etc. etc.

    • @musicbox193
      @musicbox193 4 роки тому +4

      @@CoopyKat From what I understand it is almost as if the book needed to be itself separated books. There is too much happening between each climax.

    • @ryansballparkjourney
      @ryansballparkjourney 3 роки тому +4

      I’m on the mend after a surgery yesterday and figured I’d listen to some books as I relax. Wonderful Wizard of Oz was an option and yeah, I’m like WTF?

  • @h193013
    @h193013 6 років тому +149

    Maybe Netflix could turn the books into a TV show like they did with A Series of Unfortunate Events

    • @joshimations894
      @joshimations894 3 роки тому +6

      YEEEESSSSS PLEASE THAT WOULD BE SOOOOO GOOD

    • @LatinaWednesday
      @LatinaWednesday 2 роки тому +5

      Every season could be a different book!

    • @Shamanscircle1
      @Shamanscircle1 2 роки тому +5

      I'm not sure that Netflix would be the best people to do that.

    • @h193013
      @h193013 2 роки тому +2

      @@Shamanscircle1 If not Netflix then who?

    • @PracticalBibleStudies
      @PracticalBibleStudies 2 роки тому +2

      @@h193013 Jon Favro, the guy who did The Mandalorian.

  • @AngeloThomas
    @AngeloThomas 7 років тому +139

    The author's name is L. Frank Baum, not "Frank L. Baum."

    • @whyiamafs
      @whyiamafs 7 років тому +7

      True! [the L stands for Lyman]

    • @melissacooper4482
      @melissacooper4482 5 років тому +9

      Baum didn't like being called Lyman. His friends and family called him by his middle name Frank.

    • @edwardlecore141
      @edwardlecore141 3 роки тому +1

      I constantly make that mistake.

    • @ethanomcbride
      @ethanomcbride 3 роки тому +1

      😂

  • @whyiamafs
    @whyiamafs 6 років тому +40

    You forgot 'Little Wizard Stories of Oz' - it's a collection of short stories, but it's by L. Frank Baum, I don't know why it's never considered part of the canon...

    • @amandachwa211
      @amandachwa211 4 роки тому +9

      There's also Sea Fairies and Sky Island, which do not mention Oz but relate how Trot and Cap'n Bill know about faries and why they know Button Bright prior to Scarecrow of Oz. The children wrote to Baum and told Baum to bring Trot and Cap'n Bill to Oz because of these two books.

    • @jonathanmarkoff4469
      @jonathanmarkoff4469 Рік тому +2

      @@amandachwa211 And the tales of Burzee, Merryland, Ix, Mo, and Noland, which were folded into the Ozziverse.

    • @ColonelFredPuntridge
      @ColonelFredPuntridge Рік тому +5

      Have you read the "Little Wizard Stories"? If you read them, you'll see why they're not considered part of the canon.

  • @thomasboehnlein5205
    @thomasboehnlein5205 7 років тому +159

    Just need Netflix to make an anime that is a straight forward adaptation of the book series.

    • @h193013
      @h193013 7 років тому +8

      Thomas Boehnlein There was one, if was four seasons and each season was a different book

    • @hardluck8732
      @hardluck8732 6 років тому

      what was it called?

    • @h193013
      @h193013 6 років тому

      Hard Luck I think it was just called The Wonderful Wizard of Oz

    • @misterdent9413
      @misterdent9413 6 років тому +6

      h193013 It was an anime actually, although that is the American title. It was 52 episodes in total, if I recall correctly... but it skipped from Ozma of Oz to The Emerald City of Oz, and made numerous changes along the way.

    • @UltimateFathoms
      @UltimateFathoms 5 років тому +1

      I think that would be awesome. The books are so imaginative and interesting

  • @howiecricket52
    @howiecricket52 2 роки тому +11

    Lyman (L) Frank Baum (Not Frank L Baum), Glinda The Good Witch Of The SOUTH (Not North) is found in a book chapter "Away To The South" AFTER they melt the Wicked Witch Of The West, the book has Kalidahs, part tiger/part bear, which I figure is why in the movie they chant Lions & Tigers & Bears Oh My!

  • @amandachwa211
    @amandachwa211 4 роки тому +14

    In Book 7, it is not a "couple" that get turned into marble. It is the boy's uncle and also the wife of the magician who made the powder of life. The boy then goes on the quest while the magician starts making the powder of life again, just in case he fails on his quest, as the powder takes many years to make.

  • @kskess
    @kskess 3 роки тому +17

    Thank you for this summary. I read several of those books as a child and was so emersed in them. I got to know that Oz was divided into four sectors surrounding the emerald city, and Oz was surrounded by a deadly desert. Munchkin land was blue, Winnie land was yellow (?), and the others I can't recall and have to Google lol.

  • @meloniwinter226
    @meloniwinter226 7 років тому +49

    There are actually 40 books that are canon, it's just that only the first 14 were written by L. Frank Baum. There's also multiple short stories related to the universe and it's characters.

    • @crazypotterhead4705
      @crazypotterhead4705 3 роки тому +6

      It really depends on who you ask. Some think own Baum’s are canon, others think Baum’s and Thompson’s are canon, and some thing all 40 are canon.

  • @tibs7777
    @tibs7777 7 років тому +56

    I want a series!! Do it SyFy!!!

    • @tibs7777
      @tibs7777 7 років тому +9

      You can intermingle the plots to get characters in earlier and include the other books about Trot and Capn Bill!! I'd help script it!!

    • @whyiamafs
      @whyiamafs 7 років тому +4

      Same Here/Me Too!! I want in on this!
      [THANK YOU for acknowledging these books EXIST!! #OzFandomUnite!!!]

    • @paulanthonyhoeflich8988
      @paulanthonyhoeflich8988 6 років тому +1

      Yesssss !!!!!

    • @paxhumana2015
      @paxhumana2015 3 роки тому +1

      @@tibs7777 , some of the people that made the Wild Arms JRPG series also made a JRPG of The Wizard of Oz.

  • @mrcydonia
    @mrcydonia 3 роки тому +20

    I've heard that Tik-Tok was basically the first robot, i.e. mechanical man, in literature.

    • @jonathanmarkoff4469
      @jonathanmarkoff4469 Рік тому

      Talos was the first robot in literature, in the ancient Greek stories. I'm sure there precedents of Tik-Tok in Victorian literature too.

    • @ColonelFredPuntridge
      @ColonelFredPuntridge Рік тому +5

      @@jonathanmarkoff4469 But Tik-Tok was the first purely mechanical humanoid robot whose components included no living tissue who was capable of reasoning and of/ ordinary, conversational speech.

    • @johnnehrich9601
      @johnnehrich9601 6 місяців тому

      I love the constant references to living things that aren't really living - Tik-Tok does everything but live. The scarecrow and tin woodsman are not "meat animals" so they don't eat or sleep, nor do they need to.

  • @caseyjohnson695
    @caseyjohnson695 5 років тому +15

    Good sign: the first thing the video tells us is incorrect. L. Frank Baum.

  • @melissacooper4482
    @melissacooper4482 5 років тому +13

    The search for Princess Ozma was changed in the movie. Instead of Mombi performing a gender change spell to turn Tip into Ozma Mombi enchants Ozma into a mirror. Dorothy simply reaches her hand into the mirror and pulls Ozma out.

    • @jonathanmarkoff4469
      @jonathanmarkoff4469 Рік тому

      Most movies and tv shows with Ozma leave out her transgender angle.

  • @jamesflanagan7693
    @jamesflanagan7693 3 роки тому +12

    No surprises? No major changes? Lol! I haven't even read the book but I know from various OZ documentaries that the shoes were silver, the witches weren't sisters, the tin man had chopped his own limbs off one at a time, there were mice and an army of wolves that the tin man slaughtered with his axe. Lots of difference!

  • @austinrenteria
    @austinrenteria 5 років тому +24

    I definitely got to read these books now.

  • @StickBodGoth
    @StickBodGoth 5 років тому +45

    *If I had a dollar, every time I heard OZ.*
    *I would be the riches person in OZ*

  • @ZsaZsaUmbra
    @ZsaZsaUmbra 4 роки тому +11

    There are so many errors in this video.

  • @egojames007
    @egojames007 3 роки тому +11

    I was in Love with the books from the Wizard of Oz. I read them all. I knew each Oz Character like you were talking about an old family member. I am going to re-read them again. I miss my love of Oz. I think from 1968-1973 were my intense Oz Book reading years. I remember wanting to read the other OZ books from the other authors, and the city of Signal Hill, CA had them in the public library. I went and read the books, and I loved the way the other authors took OZ. I was really, really into Oz. All the characters she names and talks about, I knew them well. All of them. I had to comment.

    • @rebekahedmunds7542
      @rebekahedmunds7542 3 роки тому +2

      Have you ever checked out The Audiobook Collection? They are all there, the 14 at least

  • @susanstorm7910
    @susanstorm7910 2 роки тому +3

    Would looooove to see Locasta / Tatypoo in more iterations bc her protection kiss made me cry bc it’s sweet asf

  • @sin-t
    @sin-t Рік тому +4

    Fun Fact: in the first book of Oz the Scarecrow snaps the necks of the crows. I had no reason to say this, just wanted to traumatize some people

    • @TJS-Real-
      @TJS-Real- Рік тому +2

      Jokes on you I’ve read the book

    • @13Kr4zYAzN13
      @13Kr4zYAzN13 10 місяців тому

      Lies of P seems to be pointing to Wizard of Oz as a potential sequel material, so I'm on board for this 👍

  • @cjbird7121
    @cjbird7121 Рік тому +2

    Difference in the first book is that the flying monkeys weren’t evil. They were under a spell of the wicked witch and had to do her bidding.
    No word of the creepy army of evil little girls with their stabby knitting needles

    • @jonathanmarkoff4469
      @jonathanmarkoff4469 Рік тому

      I loved Jinjur's army, and wrote a story where they get a comeuppance much more deserved than what Baum wrote.

  • @rcruz4510
    @rcruz4510 3 роки тому +2

    Please get the titles correct: "Rinkitink IN Oz"and "The LOST Princess of Oz". Also, "Tik Tok of Oz" took its plot from a failed musical play that Baum produced in hopes of creating another "Wizard of Oz" musical, "The Scarecrow of Oz" took its plot from a movie Baum produced that was not successful and "Rinkitink IN Oz" was originally a non-Oz book by Baum but, needing money, he changed the ending and made it an "Oz" book for financial reasons.

  • @TheNotverysocial
    @TheNotverysocial 4 роки тому +8

    I read the original 1900 novel well before I even knew the film existed. Mum exposed me to it at a young age, and have never liked the film as much as most people as a result. I never read the sequels.
    No major changes to the plot? The entire journey south the see Glinda after Dorothy missed the balloon chasing after Toto, as the good witches of the north and south were separate entities, and she only met the former at the beginning, the latter near the end Isn't a major shift? And the skills and knowledge of the north witch weren't on par with Glinda's, so she couldn't help Dot the way Glinda could have had she met her first.

  • @leoinsf
    @leoinsf 4 роки тому +3

    Thank you for giving us a quick overview of the Oz books. Is it possible to get a more expanded overview sometime? I love the Oz series but refuse to start to read the whole series.

  • @joecascone2189
    @joecascone2189 4 роки тому +5

    Nice to dedicate a post to these books, but if one is going to do an assessment on the series, one could be expected to at least get the titles right (not to mention the name of the author!). Correct titles would include "Dorothy and the Wizard IN Oz" (not "of Oz"), ditto "Rinkitink IN Oz" and "The LOST Princess of Oz!" Not much to expect, really. (Also, the lead female character in "The Tin Woodman of Oz" is "Nimmee-Amee", not "Nimme-Anne.")

  • @PanosKaplanis1
    @PanosKaplanis1 3 роки тому +3

    Prequel alternate OZ books written by the cousin from L.Frank Baum may be more interesting even than the original, because they focus on the witches rival and present us unknown witches that don't exist in Baum stories.

    • @astralwizard85
      @astralwizard85 2 роки тому

      I can't find any references online to this . Do you know the cousin's name?

    • @PanosKaplanis1
      @PanosKaplanis1 2 роки тому +1

      Τarl Telford

  • @OrchestrationOnline
    @OrchestrationOnline 3 роки тому +2

    Thanks for not making this into a glitzy puff piece with a commercial-radio sounding announcer, because Baum would have hated that. What would he have loved? A child reader talking about his books. But this narrator's fine.

  • @bethbartlett5692
    @bethbartlett5692 4 роки тому +5

    It wasn't "the Shoes" - *"its the Thoughts that took her to her desire", Quantum Physics, "Universal Law of Attraction"*
    Precision Focal Point
    Few get this ...

    • @artdanks4846
      @artdanks4846 2 роки тому

      Few get it because it's as much fantasy and fairy tale as thinking the shoes did it.

    • @bethbartlett5692
      @bethbartlett5692 2 роки тому

      @@artdanks4846
      "It is Quantum Physics Science, not Philosophy"
      - Albert Einstein
      (Argue the point with a Genius and Physicist, "I rest my facts on the Resources", those of Peer Reviewed, Journal Published, Science.)
      ...checkmate 😁😉

  • @mykeeoz84
    @mykeeoz84 4 роки тому +11

    411: The official Oz canon is 40 books. Not just the first 14.

  • @danotazmedia
    @danotazmedia 5 років тому +6

    I think we are the books should be adapted into like some sort of mini series with the multiple seasons for each book

    • @stakkzz
      @stakkzz 5 років тому +1

      I've been wanting to make a story and adaptation to these books but space themed let me know if your interested in throwing out some ideas for them because this is a good idea

  • @jamesa.fitzpatrick1566
    @jamesa.fitzpatrick1566 2 роки тому +3

    Less than a minute in and there are so many factual errors! Frank L. Baum? Most people think only his books are canon? Who researches this stuff??

  • @browngreen933
    @browngreen933 2 роки тому +2

    Incredible they all haven't been turned into movies. Instead Hollywood just turns out stupid remakes.

  • @cherylcampbell9369
    @cherylcampbell9369 5 років тому +4

    The flying thing is the Gump.

  • @lifeinconfidence
    @lifeinconfidence 3 роки тому +2

    Nice, all the books presented by Dorothy in person.

  • @ghostface_tardis
    @ghostface_tardis 3 роки тому +2

    Hope the new reboot recreates these books

  • @Dr.MantisTobogganMD
    @Dr.MantisTobogganMD 5 років тому +5

    I just believe this is all an acid trip of some teenager from the 30s.

  • @johnnehrich9601
    @johnnehrich9601 6 місяців тому

    All the books, at least all the ones written by Baum, had their copyright expire, so they are in the public domain. Easy to find them on-line, complete with the original drawings (which were a totally important component of the stories).

  • @dragonlex4
    @dragonlex4 2 роки тому +1

    There was a stop motion Russian movie on Tip's story but it had Dorothy in it and her supposed grandpa.

  • @richardranke3158
    @richardranke3158 3 місяці тому

    When I was in 3rd grade I read an abridged Ozma of Oz and loved it. I found out later how many Oz books there were...and read more.:-)

  • @77blaidddrwg
    @77blaidddrwg 2 роки тому +2

    She forgot to mention Jinjur in book 2 insighting a gender war in emerald city and made all the men do the chores and housework.

    • @jonathanmarkoff4469
      @jonathanmarkoff4469 Рік тому +1

      Jinjur is an extreme badass. Her comeuppance was disappointingly anticlimactic, so I wrote a story recently where she gets the ending she deserves.

  • @jacobbean4003
    @jacobbean4003 5 років тому +6

    Nimmie Amee. Not Anne

  • @elphiegleason3899
    @elphiegleason3899 5 місяців тому

    Can’t wait to see how and if Wicked some aspects of Baum’s canon into the movie

  • @judahosborne8868
    @judahosborne8868 4 роки тому +1

    I can't wait to get the full collection of this series!

  • @228westend
    @228westend Рік тому

    i feel like the ones after L.Frank Baum died were some of the most absurd OZ books (i love all of them)

  • @aaronapolsky8554
    @aaronapolsky8554 4 роки тому +1

    the movie return to oz both traumatized me and was very insightful to further book events

  • @joecascone2189
    @joecascone2189 4 роки тому +8

    An incredibly flawed and uninformed assessment of the books... particularly the first one. Wow!

  • @disneystories8642
    @disneystories8642 5 років тому +2

    Do four books for each of the first three seasons and do two books for the last season with 20 episodes each season all have a run time of 25-30 minutes

  • @HoboRoadrunner
    @HoboRoadrunner 5 років тому +6

    1. You got the Arthur's name wrong
    2. There's over 150 wizard of Oz books and all are considered canon

    • @crushedscouter9522
      @crushedscouter9522 2 роки тому

      Both of these are incorrect lol. Dooshbag

    • @charlesarnold1953
      @charlesarnold1953 Рік тому +1

      The 1st 40 are officially considered the canon.The International Wizard of Oz Club has published other Oz books written by authors in the canon of 40.And Sherwood Smith has written 3 Oz books in the last decade that the Baum Trust has added to the canon.

  • @PanosKaplanis1
    @PanosKaplanis1 3 роки тому +1

    I think that many of the books should be turn into movies. But it is difficult, I think. That has many demands and means much work.

  • @ColonelFredPuntridge
    @ColonelFredPuntridge Рік тому

    Rinkitink IN Oz, dear. He's not _"of_ Oz". Then again, he's not _in_ Oz much either - almost the entire book takes place outside the land of Oz. But the title of the book is RINKITINK _IN_ OZ.
    This book also contains more nods to Wagner: surely the inspiration for the dialogue in which Bilbil the goat begs Rinkitink to stop singing stupid little songs (Bilbil is very irritable and very outspoken about his master's singing) is inspired by the scene at the end of Act 2 of _DIE MEISTERSINGER VON NÜRNBERG_ in which Beckmesser begs Hans Sachs to stop singing working-songs so that he (Beckmesser) can sing a serenade to the love-interest.

  • @SeasonedDame
    @SeasonedDame 3 роки тому +1

    I Love the Return to Oz! My favorite movie

  • @jyosongurung5583
    @jyosongurung5583 Рік тому

    Santa and a poor boy in a bubble is in one of them.😂

  • @PeterKimTX
    @PeterKimTX 3 роки тому +1

    Where can one find a complete collection at a reasonable price? Not interested in a first edition; only a complete collection from the same print run*

    • @artdanks4846
      @artdanks4846 2 роки тому

      If you don't mind an electronic version, Kindle has the complete collection of Baum's 14 books in ONE Kindle book for only 99 cents!!

  • @gionnijohnson408
    @gionnijohnson408 Рік тому +1

    I like the books a lot more better and they ARE better than the movie because in the books we get to see more characters, creatures, and world building and we also get to explore the places and lands and more character growth and more adventures.

  • @timmy-the-ute2725
    @timmy-the-ute2725 11 місяців тому

    What is cannon and what is not is a bit difficult. But after the 14 Baum books there are 26 other books mostly written by Ruth Plumly Thompson for a total of 40 recongnized cannon books. Books after that are not generally considered not cannon but often because cannon was no longer important. Mainly because there is little as far as copyright to regulate it. The main characters of the early books are totally open to the public domain. It is kind of just fan fiction now.

  • @fleasname
    @fleasname 3 роки тому

    I loved return to oz, I think it still holds up.

  • @bethgott9768
    @bethgott9768 5 місяців тому

    Best ..Joyce swims in a tube surround

  • @davidlevesque6532
    @davidlevesque6532 6 років тому +1

    Since most are familiar with Dot Gale, I'd say next movie should be book #14.

  • @thisismaribethe
    @thisismaribethe 4 роки тому

    Excellent summary!!!

  • @MooTelevision
    @MooTelevision Рік тому

    Ozma of Oz is my absolute favorite book.

  • @stakkzz
    @stakkzz 5 років тому +2

    I want to make a comic that stays true to the events of the book with some slight modern adapttions or a wizard of oz that is based in spaced.. any ideas, concepts, whatever are welcomed

    • @billwenham
      @billwenham 4 роки тому +1

      There already was an award-winning faithful comic adaptation that covered the first five books.

  • @richardranke7878
    @richardranke7878 6 років тому +2

    Tik Tok might be considered the first literary robot.

  • @mazoku112
    @mazoku112 6 місяців тому

    Return to Oz is the most accurate in tone

  • @dillygdrums256
    @dillygdrums256 3 роки тому

    I might have to read these now

  • @jonathanmarkoff4469
    @jonathanmarkoff4469 Рік тому

    Since all of Baum's writing is in the public domain, anyone is free to publish their own stories about the characters and settings.

  • @theflyingninja1
    @theflyingninja1 3 роки тому +1

    There's no info here that can't be gleaned from just reading the books.

    • @crushedscouter9522
      @crushedscouter9522 2 роки тому

      This is one of the dumbest, dooshiest comments I’ve ever read.

  • @youngsplitterr
    @youngsplitterr 4 роки тому +1

    Wonder if this video will talk about the theories that people have about the first book being about various social and political issues from the time when the book was written.

    • @youngsplitterr
      @youngsplitterr 4 роки тому

      2:05 AGAIN, “Return to Oz” was never scary to me as a child. Thrilling, ethereal and suspenseful yes, but not “traumatizing” at all.

  • @lb5047
    @lb5047 3 роки тому +1

    I've never seen return to us but I've read the book it's a really good book and you should read it you know it's the same story just I guess not a straw I don't know but probably not as traumatizing as the movie unless they're equal

  • @ezcleghorn4025
    @ezcleghorn4025 2 місяці тому

    I need to know some thing I just really need to know one thing. Someone please reply to this, and if I don’t reply, it’s because for some reason blind people talking technology will not allow me to reply to comments. In the book that I mentioned above where Dorothy comes to America, it says that Glenda put Oz into a parallel universe. The only thing that I truly want to know is, in the 14 original books is Oz still technically as fantastic as it is on earth that is to say if you flew far enough or were picked up by a tornado you would end up there? That parallel universe thing is the weirdest thing of everything I just heard. Someone please tell me.

  • @ANGEL_BOB_YT
    @ANGEL_BOB_YT Рік тому

    You're right, the meaning of "Oz" in The Wizard of Oz is a bit of a mystery. There are several theories, but none of them are definitive.
    Ounces: One theory is that "Oz" is an abbreviation for ounces, which is a unit of measurement for gold and silver. In the Land of Oz, gold and silver are often used as currency, so it would make sense for the name of the land to be related to these metals.
    Ozma: Another theory is that "Oz" is a reference to Ozma, the rightful ruler of the Land of Oz. Ozma is a young girl who is also a powerful sorceress. She is often referred to as "the girl in the emerald city," and her name is an anagram of "Oz."
    Oscar Zoroaster: The Wizard of Oz's real name is Oscar Zoroaster Phadrig Isaac Norman Henkle Emmanuel Ambrose Diggs. His initials spell out "OZPINHEAD," so it's possible that he chose to shorten his name to "Oz" as a way of avoiding the nickname "Pinhead."
    It's also possible that the name "Oz" has no specific meaning at all. L. Frank Baum, the author of The Wonderful Wizard of Oz, may have simply chosen the name because it sounded good.
    Ultimately, the meaning of "Oz" in The Wizard of Oz is up to the reader's interpretation. It could be a reference to ounces, Ozma, Oscar Zoroaster, or something else entirely. The beauty of the story is that it is open to multiple interpretations.

  • @briandaleske5139
    @briandaleske5139 2 місяці тому

    I think some network, should think about making a (R)rated (WIZARD OF OZ) show, that’s based on the original (Wizard Of Oz) books stories.
    In addition I think that, either the HBO channel, or the PARAMOUNT+ network, or maybe the PEACOCK network
    One of these networks, should showcase, the (WIZARD OF OZ) show series on it.

  • @RobbieBlue
    @RobbieBlue Рік тому

    The classic is the best version theatrically speaking

  • @WTSD850
    @WTSD850 Рік тому

    fun fact marvel actually adapted th first 6 books into number of miniseries for each book

  • @desertrose0601
    @desertrose0601 5 років тому +2

    Actually that’s not true. The Baum family has authorized a few dozen more as canon Oz books as well. Do your research please before spouting your made-up opinions.

    • @crushedscouter9522
      @crushedscouter9522 2 роки тому

      Lol not made up at all. Many many people only consider the original 14 canon. Do your research before being a doosh

  • @cedricburkhart3738
    @cedricburkhart3738 3 роки тому

    Well I never saw it but I know the books.

  • @lazlow8788
    @lazlow8788 4 роки тому +1

    I read all the oz books Baum wrote before his death and to be honest they just got weirder and strangers and I mostly forgot what the stories were about. Personally I think he should have just stopped after the sixth book. The rest weren't as good.

    • @jonathanmarkoff4469
      @jonathanmarkoff4469 Рік тому

      But he gave a sandbox full of toys for other authors to play with.

  • @jennifercalkins9223
    @jennifercalkins9223 7 років тому

    let me know about maga squirel vs. Dino chipmonk. telling you I haven't heard about that one yet.

  • @geanmendes3888
    @geanmendes3888 3 роки тому

    I like more the first, and the second and the third book because have a talking yellow chicken and a magic princess named ozma
    Is very magical after I read the seven and the eight book of the patchwork girl and the tik-tok.

  • @karlstengel2648
    @karlstengel2648 3 роки тому +1

    L. Frank Baum, not Frank L. Baum

  • @williamdogan1149
    @williamdogan1149 5 місяців тому

    Dorothy's silver shoes fall off in the desest on her way bsck to Kansas!

  • @17-MASY
    @17-MASY 4 роки тому +1

    00:50 is that a JoJo reference

  • @bethgott9768
    @bethgott9768 5 місяців тому

    I love..so the name starts with P?

  • @jamiesaunders3441
    @jamiesaunders3441 4 роки тому

    Everything you didn't know? Check this out: "The Secret Of Oz" by Ben Still. He explains the hidden meanings. Very interesting!

  • @RocoWolf
    @RocoWolf 7 років тому +1

    Did No one watch Emerald City (TV show)??

    • @GleeChan
      @GleeChan 5 років тому +3

      Probably not... which is why it's not on TV anymore.

    • @jonathanmarkoff4469
      @jonathanmarkoff4469 Рік тому

      @@GleeChan Such a beautiful show with great performances and settings, but a dreadfully dull script.

  • @sshadyh
    @sshadyh Рік тому

    did she seriously just say Frank L Baum?

  • @Bighuge12
    @Bighuge12 10 місяців тому

    L frank baum you have images on screen that say it

  • @tootiefruity1197
    @tootiefruity1197 3 роки тому

    She’s wrong, I have no idea what the Wizard of Oz is about.I Haven’t seen the book or movie.

  • @sadribrown4219
    @sadribrown4219 3 роки тому

    I heard it was about the government, the gold standard and we the people expecting the government to help us when we really need to help ourselves.

  • @cornellmelton1171
    @cornellmelton1171 5 років тому

    Well I heard about the dark originals.

  • @KimsLantern
    @KimsLantern Рік тому

    I don’t know if this series could be adaptable- it seems too flippin’ weird. Lol.

  • @patrickswayze7532
    @patrickswayze7532 5 років тому

    Which book has the cowardly lion?

    • @amandachwa211
      @amandachwa211 4 роки тому

      He's in the first book as part of Dorothy's party. In book 3, he and the Hungry Tiger pull Ozma's chariot, but do not assist with changing people back from being ornaments (they wait outside, I think). In the other books he's usually seen pulling the chariot with Hungry Tiger. In Tik Tok of Oz (book 8) he has an argument with Hank the mule, who ways Betsy Bobbin is the sweetest girl ever, and the sawhorse, who says Ozma is the best. The Lion declares Dorothy to be the sweetest of the girls, but then all 3 girls show up and tell them to knock it off and be friends.

  • @AlcyoneSong
    @AlcyoneSong 3 роки тому

    Hmmmm maybe syfy

  • @Sniperk1ng187
    @Sniperk1ng187 2 роки тому +1

    Dorthory's Bizzare Adventures IS THAT A JOJO REFERENCE??

  • @dannierichie5084
    @dannierichie5084 3 роки тому

    He as drunk when he wrote it huh

  • @TheNashNetwork
    @TheNashNetwork 10 місяців тому

    Fetish for turning people into knick knacks? 😳

  • @ANGEL_BOB_YT
    @ANGEL_BOB_YT Рік тому

    There's no democracy anyway here

  • @jennifercalkins9223
    @jennifercalkins9223 7 років тому +1

    ha ha

  • @grimlyfiendish5579
    @grimlyfiendish5579 5 років тому +1

    Tim Burton is such a thief.

    • @jonathanmarkoff4469
      @jonathanmarkoff4469 Рік тому

      @@Gundam79 Tim Burton said that Jack Skellington is based on Jack Pumpkinhead.

  • @Montork
    @Montork 4 роки тому +1

    Only 14
    Hahahaha
    There where 40

    • @crushedscouter9522
      @crushedscouter9522 2 роки тому

      Are you slow?

    • @Montork
      @Montork 2 роки тому

      @@crushedscouter9522 ?????
      there are 40 canon oz books.

    • @Montork
      @Montork 2 роки тому

      @Noah Scheid i suppose?

    • @charlesarnold1953
      @charlesarnold1953 Рік тому

      Some only want to accept Baum's 14 books as the only truly Oz books.He is the original creator & father of Oz,but in organizations,for example,i.e.,The International Wizard of Oz club,they consider the "Famous Forty" to be canon.What I say is read them & just enjoy the amazing fantasy world.

    • @Montork
      @Montork Рік тому

      @@charlesarnold1953 .... he didn't write all of those 14 though.. so....
      if peeps are going by what baulm wrote only.. might as well include queen ix of zix and that sort..