Guido van Rossum on Mojo programming language | Chris Lattner and Lex Fridman

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 102

  • @LexClips
    @LexClips  Рік тому +5

    Full podcast episode: ua-cam.com/video/pdJQ8iVTwj8/v-deo.html
    Lex Fridman podcast channel: ua-cam.com/users/lexfridman
    Guest bio: Chris Lattner is a legendary software and hardware engineer, leading projects at Apple, Tesla, Google, SiFive, and Modular AI, including the development of Swift, LLVM, Clang, MLIR, CIRCT, TPUs, and Mojo.

    • @camy_dev
      @camy_dev Рік тому

      It's about being compatible with pre existing python code basis

  • @Mik1604
    @Mik1604 Рік тому +186

    This language should obviously have been named Monty and it is an unforgivable shame that is isn’t.

  • @_____case
    @_____case Рік тому +27

    Every time Lattner has worked on language infrastructure, he has never missed. Every language ecosystem *needs* an evolution strategy to get better. I'm optimistic that this will be Python's "successor".

  • @-sanket-
    @-sanket- Рік тому +27

    Great I heard some companies are hiring with 10 + years of experience for mojo

    • @xnegusx
      @xnegusx 11 місяців тому

      nah that's cap, I say I guy on LinkedIn who completed his Masters in 2022 or 23 that works at Modular

    • @stanvanillo9831
      @stanvanillo9831 11 місяців тому +1

      HAHA THIS JOKE NEVER GETS OLD

    • @vncstudio
      @vncstudio 6 місяців тому

      😂

  • @tico-k9y
    @tico-k9y Рік тому +9

    Mojo for the win, As soon as it is out, I will go full out on it

  • @pad8941
    @pad8941 9 місяців тому +2

    I always love chris's language design

  • @kikokobayashi
    @kikokobayashi Рік тому +17

    The field of programming languages is constantly evolving, I think.

    • @cammccauley
      @cammccauley Рік тому +1

      It’s at least always uhhh changing

    • @Darles.Chickens.
      @Darles.Chickens. Рік тому +5

      isn’t everything constantly evolving in its own way?

  • @smanzoli
    @smanzoli Рік тому +3

    When will be Mojo fully out? Still in 2023?

  • @javadeveloper9442
    @javadeveloper9442 Рік тому +8

    This may surprise you, i still create ai in java, java 21 is so good, and future releases will be a game changer

    • @guntherss2672
      @guntherss2672 Рік тому +10

      Boomer..lol jk

    • @ultrasound1459
      @ultrasound1459 Рік тому +3

      Java is dead

    • @Brahvim
      @Brahvim Рік тому

      Is this a meme account or real news? I'm interested if it's real news.

    • @Python_in_UA
      @Python_in_UA Рік тому +1

      Any language with OOP paradigm only - has no future. Bc it is not OOP like Alen wanted

    • @Brahvim
      @Brahvim Рік тому

      @@ITSecNEO "Good joke" :|
      _- A 17 year old writing a game engine in Java in 2023._

  • @kevingold1091
    @kevingold1091 Рік тому +8

    2:21: To boldly go where no Python program has ever gone before.

    • @Brahvim
      @Brahvim Рік тому

      I was imagining Python _in_ the kernel.

  • @kalpakHere
    @kalpakHere Рік тому +19

    Mojicians, it is !!

  • @vectoralphaSec
    @vectoralphaSec Рік тому +23

    From Pythonistas to Mojicians. I like it. Plus this has been done multiple times. Its good to move the industry forward by using better improves languages. Like:
    Objective-C -> Swift
    Java -> Kotlin
    JavaScript -> TypeScript
    C -> C++ -> (Carbon, Rust)
    And now Python -> Mojo.

    • @guntherss2672
      @guntherss2672 Рік тому +2

      Exactly! But industries are reluctant to adopting to new technology because they don't wanna recreate the entire framework which sucks

    • @Python_in_UA
      @Python_in_UA Рік тому +1

      Its cool. But do not forget ABC and 1000+ another programming languages. Mojo is one of them.

    • @BDOMyaccount
      @BDOMyaccount Рік тому +1

      Mojician 😂

    • @Brahvim
      @Brahvim Рік тому

      @@BDOMyaccount ([ 3:20 ]) is where they call them that!

    • @vyyr
      @vyyr Рік тому +1

      idk about the c->c++ part, I also don't know about the c++ -> carbon part.
      If anything it seems like the market of C and C++ successors is going to be dispersed among multiple languages, and even then C is most likely going to perservere for a long time, on the other hand every person that has spent considerable ammount of time with c++ prays to God that some language finally succeeds that piece of bloated garbage

  • @icns01
    @icns01 11 місяців тому +2

    Well if things don't work out, Chris can always get a job as a diplomat!😂
    Great communication skills!👍

  • @pjmoran42
    @pjmoran42 Рік тому +7

    So how does IDEs tool set and debugging work with Mojo?

    • @nakibingestevenadrian6683
      @nakibingestevenadrian6683 Рік тому +1

      It is still under active development.Around 8 Months old so the ecosystem is still developing

    • @vicenzogiuseppe6500
      @vicenzogiuseppe6500 Рік тому

      Amor

    • @seventeeen29
      @seventeeen29 Рік тому +2

      It's llvm based, ide tooling wil be quite easily to get up and running once it's being used in production

    • @DavidRagazzi
      @DavidRagazzi Рік тому

      They provided a plugin for Visual Studio. JetBrains already demonstrated interest in a plugin for PyCharm or even a new IDE for it.

  • @Julian.u7
    @Julian.u7 Місяць тому

    Still waiting for this

  • @danellwein8679
    @danellwein8679 Рік тому

    is there a plug in from Wolfram for Python ..

    • @smarthumanism3221
      @smarthumanism3221 Рік тому

      Wolfram... I encountered it in collge, but it was too expensive to use it. So I moved to Python and am very satisfied...
      But sometimes I miss the consistent rules and systems in Mathematica as it was maintained by one entity.

    • @kevinmcfarlane2752
      @kevinmcfarlane2752 Рік тому

      Ther are WolframAlpha plugins for the Chat AIs so I'm assuming that under the hood these are being called from Python?

    • @jasondads9509
      @jasondads9509 8 місяців тому

      you can just call their api, if not you can call their web api

  • @abudi-channel
    @abudi-channel 7 місяців тому

    I also like python, my first language is javascript but i hate curly braces so i shift to python like language, the coffeescript.

  • @greenfrogcoding
    @greenfrogcoding 6 місяців тому

    C like programming languages forever 🏆

  • @NisseOhlsen
    @NisseOhlsen Рік тому +1

    But Lex, where is your Flying V ?

  • @ashutoshchar940
    @ashutoshchar940 Рік тому +3

    They should have named it python++

    • @omarjimenezromero3463
      @omarjimenezromero3463 6 місяців тому

      it could be more logical and marketing friendly because is the same sht they did with C, so if you know how have been things in the last 20 years, python++ were sure a better name.

    • @nemplayer1776
      @nemplayer1776 8 днів тому

      python+=1

  • @justinfuruness7954
    @justinfuruness7954 Рік тому +4

    Idk, I tried mojo. It significantly slowed down my python code, by about 20%. And was 600% slower than pypy. Maybe it’s good for certain things, but I think their marketing team overhyped it like crazy.

    • @Brahvim
      @Brahvim Рік тому +1

      ...Sorry!?

    • @RJ-or8bw
      @RJ-or8bw 6 місяців тому

      Dictionaries aren't optimized yet. Was it just running your 100% python code slower? Or did you add the static typing and it slowed you down?

    • @justinfuruness7954
      @justinfuruness7954 6 місяців тому +2

      @@RJ-or8bw It was running 100% python code slower, didn't change any static typing. It was moreso that the language claims its a superset of python but it slows down actual python code, and is way slower than pypy code. Maybe there's specific use cases for it where that isn't the case, it just isn't marketed as such imo.

  • @nandoflorestan
    @nandoflorestan 6 місяців тому +1

    Mojo isn't even open source. That's gross.

    • @Prometheus_Alt
      @Prometheus_Alt 3 місяці тому

      Not yet, they have plans to do so in the future once everything stabilises

  • @thegoru0106
    @thegoru0106 Рік тому +25

    Doesn't Julia solves this exact problem? I don't get it.

    • @alejandroenriquez8508
      @alejandroenriquez8508 Рік тому +1

      Well, jack of all trades, master of none.

    • @alexshaykevich509
      @alexshaykevich509 Рік тому +4

      @@tseclassestseclasses4955 The industry is learn new things for the sake of learning new things though. I heard all these things already when he created Swift. Now, apparently, we need yet another new language. The truth is that these decisions are driven by personality not engineering.

    • @davidh00
      @davidh00 Рік тому

      ​@alexshaykevich509 Agreed. High levels of egoism and sense of legacy with tech movers and shakers.

    • @ハェフィシェフ
      @ハェフィシェフ Рік тому +13

      Julia has shit libraries and it doesn't have the exact same syntax as python as a subset. The documentation is awful and there were/(and probably) are bugs in for instance zygote

    • @joelmanning249
      @joelmanning249 Рік тому +8

      Python is popular and known by a larger pool of people. Mojo also possesses features that are utilised in abundance in C++ and Java for example both of which have high exposure and usage in the world. It’s not complicated take the best of both worlds and put them into one as opposed to learning a brand new language

  • @gorojo1
    @gorojo1 Рік тому +4

    "So...package ported to Mojo, then a Python interface." This is why Lex is the Feynman of computer science.

  • @53nat0r
    @53nat0r Рік тому +2

    All my colleagues have moved away from python to golang. My friends in other companies are migrating to golang too. Too fast and easy to learn

    • @chamber3593
      @chamber3593 Рік тому +1

      Golang is not for AI.

    • @armincal9834
      @armincal9834 Рік тому

      Why golang and not rust?

    • @smanzoli
      @smanzoli Рік тому

      @@armincal9834 easy and fast enough vs difficult...

  • @naninano8813
    @naninano8813 8 місяців тому +2

    this python craze must end. what an awful, awful thing to look at. hard to read hard to reason about. disguising. language design peaked at java

    • @AlexRodriguez-gb9ez
      @AlexRodriguez-gb9ez 6 місяців тому

      Smalltalk, Lisp(homoiconocity, macros, quote), also maybe the algebraic effect type languages seem much better designed than modern languages

  • @Python_in_UA
    @Python_in_UA Рік тому +3

    Sorry but as fo me Mojo is a girl and boy in one body. Interesting? Yes. Wanna to be - not yet.

    • @omarjimenezromero3463
      @omarjimenezromero3463 6 місяців тому

      anime futanaries sound interesting, but you sure want girls and boys around anyway XD

  • @ehsankhorasani_
    @ehsankhorasani_ Рік тому +2

    I wish it didn't have python syntax, not a fun of those indentations

  • @just_A_doctor
    @just_A_doctor Рік тому

    Python 4 is coming soon the game will change on u soon 🔜
    No need to new Lang . We are good with py

    • @arthurpenndragon6434
      @arthurpenndragon6434 Рік тому +3

      guido himself said python 4 might not even happen.

    • @fenixfve2613
      @fenixfve2613 Рік тому +3

      There will be no python 4, there will be python 3.13, 3.14... 3.99, 3.100... 3.1488

    • @just_A_doctor
      @just_A_doctor Рік тому +1

      @@arthurpenndragon6434 he said not on 2023 or even 2024 he didn't said it is not coming but next 2025 the new update is coming and when that happens every system made with py 3 is gonna be outdate like the py 2

    • @chamber3593
      @chamber3593 Рік тому

      After 3 years maybe because GIL is under removal with the help of meta engineer.

    • @alxjones
      @alxjones 6 місяців тому

      You definitely don't speak for the entirely of the Python user base. Being able to easily get features like SIMD/vectorization and a borrow checker while keeping the simplicity of Python's syntax, _and_ being compatible with all existing Python code, that has a lot of appeal to many.

  • @atultripathi9166
    @atultripathi9166 Рік тому +1

    He is lying