Garland testimony gets heated over Hunter Biden investigation | LiveNOW from FOX

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 3,5 тис.

  • @barbaracrawford6233
    @barbaracrawford6233 Рік тому +36

    You know there's something going on when someone can't answer yes or no and they go into all these descriptions around the question that has nothing to do with the question that was asked. He sure looks like he knows something is wrong,oh man they'll get you in the end,your bridge is collapsing.😂

  • @marleneastorino8998
    @marleneastorino8998 Рік тому

    You should practice what you preach AG Mr. Garland

  • @phyllisromano6186
    @phyllisromano6186 Рік тому

    I am so sick of tbese hearings. They dont answer the questions. They just evade.

  • @frank64409
    @frank64409 10 місяців тому

    Defund the FBI and the DOJ. The FBI has a budget of 11.4 billion, and the DOJ has a 2024 budget of 39.7 billion. That is 51.1 billion dollars for one year. Divide that to the states and see if they could do a better job. If it doesn't work out, we could always start a new FBI and DOJ.

  • @stevenpearse1255
    @stevenpearse1255 Рік тому

    Thank God he was denied the Supreme Court

  • @michaelbailey1352
    @michaelbailey1352 Рік тому +140

    Anytime these clowns don't want to testify they just say it's an ongoing investigation healthy run investigation for five years until the statute of limitations runs out and then the person goes free that's Injustice and that person that allowed that to happen should be in jail himself

    • @martharigby5246
      @martharigby5246 Рік тому +4

      Farmland said he promised the Senate he would not interfere with Weiss’s investigation, not that he wouldn’t comment.

    • @martharigby5246
      @martharigby5246 Рік тому +1

      Garland not Farmland

    • @jaystephens5216
      @jaystephens5216 Рік тому

      What the justice department does is screw the American people

    • @brucenance8013
      @brucenance8013 10 місяців тому

      That's why I have no confidence in Congress anymore it's a jailable offense just to lie to them so why haven't they charged any of these Democratic people with lying to Congress , Macon where lie detectors during them talking to Congress

    • @michaelimbimbo9404
      @michaelimbimbo9404 10 місяців тому

      He’s a criminal like biden

  • @marklinkous9869
    @marklinkous9869 10 місяців тому +14

    He sits there and lies and knows he'll get away with it because nobody has been held accountable for decades

    • @MsBaxter77
      @MsBaxter77 3 місяці тому

      What do all the MEMBERS of CONGRESS and AG MERRICK GARLAND on the left side of the ISLE who are providing POLITICAL COVER for PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN have in COMMON. Namely, JERRY NADLER, CHUCK SCHUMER, DEBBIE WASHERMAN SCHULTZ, JAMIE RASKIN, ERIC SWALWELL, ADAM SCHIFF and DANIEL GOLDMAN. Additionally, what do all the MEMBERS of the FEDERAL RESERVE have in COMMON with AG MERRICK GARALND and JERRY NADLER, CHUCK SCHUMER, DEBBIE WASHERMAN SCHULTZ, JAMIE RASKIN, ERIC SWALWELL, ADAM SCHIFF and DANIEL GOLDMAN. Once you figure that out then you will understand why the MEGA CORPORATIONS like VANGUARD and BLACKROCK want to GUARD and PROTECT the BIDEN CRIME FAMILY SYNDICATE!
      NATIONAL ASSOCIATION for the ADVANCEMENT of WHITE PEOPLE

  • @annmathews8756
    @annmathews8756 Рік тому +114

    Every last one of them needs to be investigated.

    • @t.j.mccowan6584
      @t.j.mccowan6584 Рік тому +2

      And all there cases and the people they have locked away

    • @t.j.mccowan6584
      @t.j.mccowan6584 Рік тому +5

      Clear they arrest for favors and for money

    • @brandon7233
      @brandon7233 Рік тому

      Ann needs to be investigated, Fox News told me that Ann is a communist, trust me y’all 🤡🤡🤡

    • @VIC33-bd6dc
      @VIC33-bd6dc Рік тому +2

      wont do any good...peter roberts owns the 3 LETTER MOB GROUPS

    • @margaretsomerville2510
      @margaretsomerville2510 Рік тому

      To impeach the GOP for lack of knowledge, bullying, and distortion of the facts is an unlikely charge😂

  • @glasman9
    @glasman9 Рік тому +96

    Listening to this makes me sick... When they are directed to appear before a committee, if they don't answer the questions they should be held in contempt of committee and fined 1000.00 per refusal.

    • @jaytmg5228
      @jaytmg5228 Рік тому +1

      to me, contempt of congress is an admirable position

    • @ethanweeter2732
      @ethanweeter2732 Рік тому

      That is not a thing. He could invoke the Fifth Amendment anyhow or Executive Privilege.

    • @wysetech2000
      @wysetech2000 Рік тому +1

      @glasman9 There are certain questions he can't answer or he would be violating the rights of some Americans.

    • @Homesteadturcke
      @Homesteadturcke Рік тому +9

      He dodged literally every question by repeating a handful of memorized lines.

    • @wysetech2000
      @wysetech2000 Рік тому +2

      @@Homesteadturcke No Proof he was hiding anything.

  • @stephanielaur9257
    @stephanielaur9257 Рік тому +15

    I guarantee we are not treated the same. If anyone not associated with the government... These charges would have already served their time.

    • @midnite325
      @midnite325 Рік тому

      Or at least still be serving their many yrs of time.

    • @mattifolks
      @mattifolks 3 місяці тому

      Yes, if Diaper Donny T was not a former President, he would have been put in jail years ago.

  • @wendyspencer3786
    @wendyspencer3786 Рік тому +289

    Wonder why Weiss isnt there answering the question of why he didnt do anything of Hunter investigation in the allotted time . I would love to hear the answer coming out of his mouth under oath.

    • @timm8263
      @timm8263 Рік тому +9

      Simple, Weiss is not the AG.

    • @CoryKlim
      @CoryKlim Рік тому

      Because there is nothing there. Weiss is a lifelong republican and was Trump appointed. If he couldn't charge him its because there was nothing to charge him for obviously.

    • @McMinderbinder
      @McMinderbinder Рік тому +19

      They will eventually get to Weiss.

    • @natecarte6807
      @natecarte6807 Рік тому +25

      Because Weiss is currently prosecuting the case against Hunter, he's not going to divulge details in an ongoing case.

    • @WhyHandleYouTube
      @WhyHandleYouTube Рік тому +27

      ​@@timm8263"I'm sitting here with my father waiting..."
      FJB's Crackhead Adult Offspring

  • @lindadiaz3268
    @lindadiaz3268 Рік тому +19

    Slap that man up side his head, how hard is it to say yes or no

    • @mattifolks
      @mattifolks 3 місяці тому

      Well, when cult members who happen to be serving in the House are asking questions based on conspiracy theories and nonsense, then he responsibly answers the questions with context, instead of a simple yes or no that would be twisted and bastardized by the right wing nut jobs that are asking the questions.

  • @drlobomalo
    @drlobomalo Рік тому +8

    Why is it important that Weiss was appointed by Trump when we know the nomination would have gone nowhere without the OK of the two Democrat Senators from Delaware? That's the long standing practice in the Senate. And since they're not only Democrats, but also from Delaware, we know they're practically members of Biden's family.

    • @gottagoforit6574
      @gottagoforit6574 Рік тому +1

      ..."two Democratic Senators from Delaware..." FIFY So are you also claiming that the R senators are practically members of the former guy's family?

    • @wysetech2000
      @wysetech2000 Рік тому

      The reason Garland appointed Weise was to make it not look political since Trump hired him. It looks like that's not good enough.

  • @stevenorosz1518
    @stevenorosz1518 Рік тому +150

    Everyone should be treated equally under the law. Regardless of political standing

    • @stevenorosz1518
      @stevenorosz1518 Рік тому +14

      Everyone is treated alike except democrat elitist

    • @timm8263
      @timm8263 Рік тому

      Hunter Biden's crimes do not rise to the level of the U.S. Attorney General. No other fully cooperative U.S. citizen would have been indicted.

    • @TIM1948
      @TIM1948 Рік тому +10

      MAGA doesn't want that; they want a president's lawyer like Jeffrey Clark or BARR.

    • @Robert-er5wq
      @Robert-er5wq Рік тому +8

      @@stevenorosz1518 Or Trump. Any other defendant tweeting similar things about investigators and courts would wait in jail for their court date

    • @vas-87
      @vas-87 Рік тому

      Lol. Leftists are and believed they are above the law.

  • @OscyJack-
    @OscyJack- Рік тому +123

    What happened to the people of courage who used to hold the positions. Bunch of cowards up there these days.

    • @foshat777
      @foshat777 Рік тому +3

      Their power has been taken from them in one way or another

    • @OscyJack-
      @OscyJack- Рік тому +3

      @@foshat777 I think you mean freely given...

    • @foshat777
      @foshat777 Рік тому

      @@OscyJack- freely given by whom?

    • @krasavam1625
      @krasavam1625 Рік тому +2

      I don't understand why Wiess ask to be a special counsel and garland made him a special counsel, I thought gov officials and AG CHOOSE who to appoint not go with a flow of someone asking for favors to prosecute someone else

    • @dixiecroft6662
      @dixiecroft6662 Рік тому +2

      Captured, more likely.

  • @captmrgn7040
    @captmrgn7040 Рік тому +17

    When they refuse to answer simple questions, then you know they're guilty.

    • @gottagoforit6574
      @gottagoforit6574 Рік тому

      When they refuse to allow the witness to answer their questions, then you they're lying.

    • @captmrgn7040
      @captmrgn7040 Рік тому

      @@gottagoforit6574 When they try to exhaust all the time for questions by giving a wordy non-answer, then you know they’re guilty.

  • @danielwalker7269
    @danielwalker7269 Рік тому +42

    I wonder sometimes if we are indeed run by competing aliens. The chasm between parties feels like it sometimes it’s unbelievable

    • @ГришаФэша
      @ГришаФэша Рік тому +4

      It's more like Righteous Republicans vs Demonic Democrats.

    • @CoryKlim
      @CoryKlim Рік тому

      @@ГришаФэша There is not one single thing that is righteous about Republicans. Your Cult leader is about to go down for 81 federal charges. So more like Criminally Insane MAGA supporters vs. Fed-up Democrats trying to take our country back from aspiring fascist dictators!
      Trump will certainly rot in jail and then burn in the deepest pits of hell for all of eternity! How you like them apples?

    • @Invisible910
      @Invisible910 Рік тому

      @@ГришаФэша Russian

    • @jonathangumra1661
      @jonathangumra1661 Рік тому +1

      D.C is a swamp 😂😮😅

  • @williamdurant9875
    @williamdurant9875 Рік тому +182

    We don't need to defend them we need to get rid of the bad actors in liars

    • @darlin5167
      @darlin5167 Рік тому

      Yes let's get rid of these Republican phonies who are trying to drum up bogus charges just to get the Democratic presidential contender.

    • @jasonwebb6885
      @jasonwebb6885 Рік тому +2

      If by “fire” you mean “imprison,” then yes.

    • @Robert-er5wq
      @Robert-er5wq Рік тому

      Well let's hope Fani Willis is victorious, then. Giuliani already admitted to have lied when he claimed 'the election was stolen'.

    • @Jacob-ml5bp
      @Jacob-ml5bp Рік тому

      the bad actors are inside of the liars? via which orifice?

    • @CoryKlim
      @CoryKlim Рік тому

      You mean all the MAGA supportering Republicans? Most of them are being imprisoned thankfully for their acts of seditious conspiracy/ insurrection/ attempted coup after being a bunch of sore pu$$y losers.

  • @justine2520
    @justine2520 Рік тому +27

    He refuses to discuss because hes better than all of us😂

    • @rondawalker8285
      @rondawalker8285 Рік тому

      Know he's supposed to say the hell out of it you freaking *ing *ongs that's the whole idea of a special counsel woohoo 🥴

  • @davidhavens745
    @davidhavens745 Рік тому +14

    What about the threats from a senior senator toward two Supreme Court Justices?

    • @macsmith2013
      @macsmith2013 Рік тому

      You mean the two corrupt, billionaire sponsored ones?

  • @Torgo-and-the-Lucifer-Cat
    @Torgo-and-the-Lucifer-Cat Рік тому +130

    They are able to avoid any responsibility by either saying that it is sensitive information or pointing the finger at somebody that isn't there, what a disgrace🎉

    • @ethanweeter2732
      @ethanweeter2732 Рік тому

      Hunter’s private tax returns were private. He did not work for the US Government. Trump technically did not have turn over tax records, though he did in one year as POTUS and failed to do so.

    • @macsmith2013
      @macsmith2013 Рік тому +2

      You DO know how special investigators are supposed to work, don't you?

    • @Torgo-and-the-Lucifer-Cat
      @Torgo-and-the-Lucifer-Cat Рік тому +10

      @@macsmith2013 yeah they screw around waste our tax dollars and at the end of it all nothing happens to anybody so yes I do understand

    • @michaelhoffman2007
      @michaelhoffman2007 Рік тому

      Pretty simple, somebody is lying, either Garland or Weiss? It's not that tough! WTF! No more farming around, bring in both Weiss and Garland. Obvious stone walling that every American can see. We're not blind!😮

    • @topchief777
      @topchief777 Рік тому +3

      @macsmith2013 What’s the reason they call it a “special investigation” if there isn’t a two tiered system? Wake up.

  • @GritsAndGameplay
    @GritsAndGameplay Рік тому +31

    They should put them in a lie detector and under oath and ask direct yes or no questions to them. See how fast the laws start to get followed in the country without fail when accountability becomes a thing again.

    • @joebright4607
      @joebright4607 Рік тому

      There must be reprisals.

    • @margaretsomerville2510
      @margaretsomerville2510 Рік тому

      The GOP would then be required to ask fact based questions. UNLIKELY

    • @danielsmit11
      @danielsmit11 Рік тому +2

      ​@@margaretsomerville2510you have to be pretty blind to dismiss all of the evidence that's been easily available for nearly a decade now.

    • @wysetech2000
      @wysetech2000 Рік тому

      They no longer use lie detectors. 1960s technology.

    • @climatechangelumber5480
      @climatechangelumber5480 9 місяців тому

      ....asking regular normal questions rather than crap questions would help the most.

  • @kennethmiller6936
    @kennethmiller6936 Рік тому +30

    Why is Weiss not there? Nothing was accomplished without him.

    • @carrieporter3401
      @carrieporter3401 Рік тому +2

      😂😂😂Thats why he wasn't there.

    • @macsmith2013
      @macsmith2013 Рік тому

      Because he isn't the AG maybe? Just guessing.
      Not to mention you apparently do not know how a special investigator/projecutor is supposed to work.

  • @garyleetillman6772
    @garyleetillman6772 Рік тому +11

    Republicans and their committees wow!!!

    • @Gabbyness41
      @Gabbyness41 Рік тому

      They’re morons, alright! 🙈

    • @wysetech2000
      @wysetech2000 Рік тому +4

      @garyleetillman6772 The sick part is that HB is being dragged through hell for buying a gun while supposedly on drugs. There was no ammo in it and had never been fired. If Trump had not been indicted none of this would have mattered to these crazies. I sure am happy I don't live there but the entertainment value is great. I'm sure the whole world thinks the same thing.

  • @rogermoses4212
    @rogermoses4212 Рік тому +20

    When they don't want to answer a yes or no question with a speech, shows me they're guilty!

    • @SandraLocke-o2w
      @SandraLocke-o2w 9 місяців тому

      He keeps acting like he can't hear or maybe he's confused about the question.

    • @climatechangelumber5480
      @climatechangelumber5480 9 місяців тому

      ...shows me that the question is bogus . Crap questions are maliscious.

  • @tapout73
    @tapout73 Рік тому +26

    Funny how garland can answer the questions from dems, but not from reps.

    • @alexn8767
      @alexn8767 Рік тому

      Republicans are asking for privileged information they aren’t entitled to.

    • @dachjohnson8084
      @dachjohnson8084 Рік тому +5

      Funny how you can't see he answered the questions...and you just don't like hearing the truth

    • @mattifolks
      @mattifolks 3 місяці тому

      Dems are reps, so he is answering questions from reps. He is also answering questions from cult members on the other side. That you don't like the answers is irrelevant.

  • @suziepickett7313
    @suziepickett7313 Рік тому +27

    Do it right, but clean this evil swamp. We the people have no chance if swamp has its way

    • @TIM1948
      @TIM1948 Рік тому

      The evil swamp was the Trump administration...Do you even stay informed with current events?

    • @Murchad99
      @Murchad99 Рік тому +1

      The moment you made "swamp" into a partisan term, you lost the argument. And that moment occurred before you even started.

    • @t.j.mccowan6584
      @t.j.mccowan6584 Рік тому

      Ur wrong the swomp needs drained stop acting as if ur the ruler of are speach i know what he means iamd i agree fully drain the swomp if not it will be over ran by blood sucking sketters how about that there mister dictater of words

  • @victorialopez6446
    @victorialopez6446 Рік тому +9

    Get Weiss and Garland under oath together!!!

  • @Adam-gg7ps
    @Adam-gg7ps Рік тому +64

    The FBI should not be disbanded. The FBI agents who broke the law should be prosecuted and imprisoned.

    • @agapelove2853
      @agapelove2853 Рік тому +3

      Yes I agree …

    • @ronniestobbart4759
      @ronniestobbart4759 Рік тому +2

      ​@@CrayTommaybe you could get JFK jr or one of those other undead people Q is talking about.

    • @vas-87
      @vas-87 Рік тому

      ​​@@CrayTomFor now demented biden/Beijing.😂😂

    • @ethanweeter2732
      @ethanweeter2732 Рік тому

      I actually agree. But Republicans seem to think a few bad apples makes the whole bunch rotten and are calling for the FBI To be defunded, in their own words.

    • @johnnybarfield4402
      @johnnybarfield4402 10 місяців тому

      Bring in the U S Marshall's to take their place.

  • @tdw5933
    @tdw5933 Рік тому +17

    STONEWALLING!!

    • @ronbrown2542
      @ronbrown2542 Рік тому

      He's saying what he's legally allowed to say and these professional republican liers are trying to use that against him to get sound bites

  • @reginabasilio8456
    @reginabasilio8456 10 місяців тому +2

    Defunding the FBI should be done ASAP!!!!

  • @patrickmcbrewhouse
    @patrickmcbrewhouse Рік тому +48

    Sounds like Weiss needed to answer questions with this guy.

    • @timm8263
      @timm8263 Рік тому

      Simple, Weiss is not the AG.

    • @Gabbyness41
      @Gabbyness41 Рік тому +1

      @@timm8263 but he is the special prosecutor, now.

    • @Murchad99
      @Murchad99 Рік тому

      Why? Does Congress, or more specifically Republican weaponized committees within Congress, dictate the manner in which professional federal prosecutors prosecute a case? No, not really. That's called interference, not oversight.
      There'll be plenty of time once the trial is over for Republicans to whine and gnash over why Weiss didn't charge Hunter Biden with treason for his vastly-overblown low-grade crimes involving improper ownership of firearms and tax fraud, at the bequest of a Republican voter base who demands unfettered firearm ownership and celebrates and glorifies politicians who are caught and convicted of tax fraud.

  • @Troll_Spanker
    @Troll_Spanker Рік тому +32

    Has Jerry Nadler ever asked a real question😢

    • @douglashedricks4803
      @douglashedricks4803 Рік тому +8

      Jerry Nadler s*** himself during that interview

    • @craiggearhart6413
      @craiggearhart6413 Рік тому

      He can't talk with that hoagie stuck in his throat.

    • @hitthecouch
      @hitthecouch Рік тому +2

      No, he spends half his time falling asleep; the other half being woken up by his aides 😂

    • @williamwheatley1604
      @williamwheatley1604 Рік тому +1

      Well, filling his depends up at least…

  • @1969nitsuga
    @1969nitsuga 9 місяців тому +2

    "I promise..." Garland somehow thinks his word at this point is worth something!

  • @TheCollective-th420
    @TheCollective-th420 Рік тому +6

    are these guys aware that tough talk doesn't cover for nonsensical questions? lmao

  • @checkerscat
    @checkerscat Рік тому +18

    Like all hearings....We learn NOTHING! It's all a big joke!'

    • @Robert-er5wq
      @Robert-er5wq Рік тому

      Yeah. All the 'we know something, we have proof, but no one is allowed to see it'. Even Fox hosts are loosing their patience now: "So where is that smoking gun?' 'Later! But it's UNBELIEVABLE!!!'

    • @FriedChairs
      @FriedChairs Рік тому

      Any hearing in the House which is run by Republicans will be a clown show just like this one. You can bank on it.

  • @Juliepenrod
    @Juliepenrod 10 місяців тому +1

    They are breaking down...Getting weak ..lying takes so much energy..They are loosing 🤔🤔

  • @stephenmitchell9024
    @stephenmitchell9024 Рік тому +26

    They should have them both there at the same time.

  • @createlove-Diana
    @createlove-Diana Рік тому +21

    This is absolutely ridiculous

    • @heavyd777
      @heavyd777 Рік тому +5

      Why, because he's a Democrat?

    • @doiin4667
      @doiin4667 Рік тому

      More ridiculous than trump pleading the 5th 😂😂😂

    • @Republicanismisadisease
      @Republicanismisadisease Рік тому +4

      @@heavyd777. No, Sparky, because it’s all to get out the GQP’s talking points, and avoid doing their jobs.

    • @riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiip
      @riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiip Рік тому +2

      It's a waste of millions of dollars of taxpayer money to get a couple of sound bites.

    • @createlove-Diana
      @createlove-Diana Рік тому

      @@heavyd777 because it's a waste of our tax dollars, just my opinion

  • @AndresMartinez-xd8eh
    @AndresMartinez-xd8eh 9 місяців тому +1

    When Trump comes back he will fired you Garland

  • @josephreis2274
    @josephreis2274 Рік тому +15

    The next time you are charged with something ask for the best lawyer that money can buy then you may have equal justice if they are willing to pay for it that is equal justice.

    • @lisastotler9413
      @lisastotler9413 Рік тому

      If they keep defending the police no one gets charged. No need for lawyers anymore. Because they'll be no justice. like New york, California, Minnesota, just ask Shavanthi Sathanandan,chairwoman who was attacked in front of her kids. But she asked to defund the police. It's scary, but they don't care

    • @lukasgia
      @lukasgia Рік тому

      Lol Right!!! Just need the Bribe-den s money printing machine...

  • @naykidd14420
    @naykidd14420 Рік тому +36

    I understand the need for water boarding in the pursuit of truth.

  • @ken.matinale
    @ken.matinale Рік тому +2

    Does Weiss report directly to Garland? Weiss must have an immediate supervisor. Wouldn't that supervisor monitor and evaluate the performance of Weiss? Did Weiss get a performance review after Garland became Attorney General?

    • @wysetech2000
      @wysetech2000 Рік тому

      He does not answer to Garland, EVER.

  • @artbris16
    @artbris16 Рік тому +10

    Impeach him and proscute him for lying to congress

  • @Projectpat0589
    @Projectpat0589 Рік тому +4

    I made promises I wouldn’t talk to you sorry I can’t

  • @chrisislas1838
    @chrisislas1838 Рік тому +1

    Unbelievable. Example-Here is a question: Is your last name Garland?
    Answer: Well my mother bore me as a child when she was with my father whose was or is a man who worked for...
    It's a direction question not a rhetorical one. Yes or no is all that is required. Man, I guess when your AZZ is on the line, being evasive and lying seem to be the only recourse. Just tell the truth!

  • @sulongsavage900
    @sulongsavage900 Рік тому +79

    “Whether or not to let the statute of limitations expire”… why is that an option? Let law breakers… break the law? What prosecutor would do that? (The last response Garland gave)

    • @darlin5167
      @darlin5167 Рік тому +7

      I don't think you understand what they mean by the statute of limitations expiring.

    • @randbarrett8706
      @randbarrett8706 Рік тому

      We let you break the law, don’t we?
      Maybe next time you exceed the speed limit on a roadway a cop should kill you on the side of the street, the way we treat black people

    • @timbyrd4894
      @timbyrd4894 Рік тому +4

      There are many possibilities, all of which fall under prosecutorial discretion. Two of such possibilities are: (1) the prosecutor determined that the evidence was insufficient to bring charges; and (2) those facts fit the elements of a different crime with a longer statue of limitations and the prosecutor intends to bring those charges for whatever reason (easier to prove, harsher punishment, etc). Every time a prosecutor chooses not to bring charges, the statute of limitations eventually expires.

    • @sulongsavage900
      @sulongsavage900 Рік тому

      @@timbyrd4894 I understand that for normal cases and normal circumstances, but I mean google ‘Hunter Biden underage hookers crack pipes’ and hit images for me. Then look up IRS whistleblowers and their claims of so many red flags he should have been forced to hand over records himself! Any non-rich, non-politically connected American would be instantly audited and looked over with just one!!!

    • @andrew5207
      @andrew5207 Рік тому +1

      @@timbyrd4894 great response.

  • @abdallaha92
    @abdallaha92 Рік тому +80

    The Senate: Don't say anything about the investigation
    The House: Why won't you say anything about the investigation

    • @AllFascistsCanSuckIt
      @AllFascistsCanSuckIt Рік тому +1

      That’s the Nazi-Republican Party for ya!

    • @Republicanismisadisease
      @Republicanismisadisease Рік тому

      The Senate: Let’s investigate Trump’s crimes in office.
      The House: Why don’t we focus on making up phony crimes committed by Biden?

    • @WhyHandleYouTube
      @WhyHandleYouTube Рік тому +6

      ​@@RepublicanismisadiseaseYou sound vaccinated.

    • @WhyHandleYouTube
      @WhyHandleYouTube Рік тому +13

      ​@@Republicanismisadisease"I'm sitting here with my father waiting..."
      FJB's Crackhead Adult Offspring

    • @isaacvarela667
      @isaacvarela667 Рік тому +5

      ⁠@@WhyHandleUA-cam”So go home. We love you, you’re very special” Trump to the people who tried to overthrow your government. Or what about

  • @Machino
    @Machino Рік тому +1

    Why did Nadler ask a hypothetical question? This is the oversight committee, not the fortune teller committee. Such a waste of time.

  • @madmaxwoman2023
    @madmaxwoman2023 Рік тому +11

    Avoiding the answer not answering the question is actually answering the question

    • @iamwell5654
      @iamwell5654 Рік тому +1

      Noooooo! Really? You graduated top of the class in law school I’m sure

  • @skippybiscuit275
    @skippybiscuit275 Рік тому +22

    Their whistle blowers! Lmao

    • @t.j.mccowan6584
      @t.j.mccowan6584 Рік тому

      You find somthing funny about making mockery of this great nastion cause that funny we have plenty doors you can leave threw

  • @nanny1413
    @nanny1413 Рік тому +1

    Garland should be removed from his position. He must answer their questions because they are over his department.

  • @paulanelson1629
    @paulanelson1629 Рік тому +12

    See how they state things in hopes of giving a misinformation.😅

  • @earlrivera76
    @earlrivera76 Рік тому +4

    Garland for the win 😂😂😂😂

  • @xxakli
    @xxakli 9 місяців тому +1

    What’s with this ‘promise’ crap
    He sounds like he’s in junior high
    ‘Grown-up’s’ don’t make promises they just do what they say they’re going to do and say what they’re going to do
    If you feel like you got to make promises, that means you’re a freaking liar

  • @samesryals6952
    @samesryals6952 Рік тому +7

    Why can't he just answer a question without some spin behind it

    • @t.j.mccowan6584
      @t.j.mccowan6584 Рік тому

      Because he a lieing sack of ....crimanal and for ever he will be knows as such

    • @eojabac7123
      @eojabac7123 Рік тому +1

      Why can't questions without political spin be asked the the clown committee? Lead clown Jordan.

  • @foshat777
    @foshat777 Рік тому +6

    He exposed himself as being part of the prosecution

  • @rickmcmhan2296
    @rickmcmhan2296 9 місяців тому +1

    I'm a registered Independent and past democrat supporter but Garland should be fired

  • @077533
    @077533 Рік тому +8

    Overseeing the investigator is not interfering with the investigation

    • @Robert-er5wq
      @Robert-er5wq Рік тому

      Well, it would mean to make certain calls. For example the statute of limitations decision. Weiss may have wanted to save his breath on that. Garland saying he should investigate it would have been misconstrued as sending Weiss on a wild goose chase. So I don't think the answer is that easy.
      I think Garland as someone appointed by Biden did well to erect some kind of wall of governance. Weiss is not a rookie. If he doesn't want to pursue certain avenues, that's his prerogative.
      I find it however interesting, that wherever we look: Trump appointees are just not cutting it. Weiss is the latest example

    • @077533
      @077533 Рік тому

      @@Robert-er5wq Weiss is doing the same thing Muller did. Run up time & come up with nothing but lying on a gun application for a charge.
      Cocaine in the WH? It belongs to no one?
      Hunter admitted to the laptop bc he's suing the repair guy for giving it to the police after seeking legal advice. FBI took the device & have been sitting on it for how long? Yet during the same time FBI was involved in creating a "Let's kidnap the governor coup" during Trumps Admin. 3 men were charged & acquitted recently (all the others were FBI or FBI Affiliated)

  • @tyboogie343
    @tyboogie343 Рік тому +20

    Keep speaking about Hunter Biden like he's the president😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @1yetae
      @1yetae Рік тому

      🤣🤣🤣

  • @jayrich1977
    @jayrich1977 Рік тому +1

    Garland excuse over and over is Mr weis is Trump appointed. Trump didn’t pick him specifically, he was recommended to Trump so stop trying to act like because he was selected by the Trump administration he has some allegiance to Trump and so his actions are all above board

  • @kimberleestovall9519
    @kimberleestovall9519 Рік тому +13

    These people work for us!!! I am so tired of hearing that they cannot answer anything!! 🤬

    • @mattalibozek7258
      @mattalibozek7258 Рік тому +5

      Stop asking about ongoing investigations then…

    • @austinorino9503
      @austinorino9503 Рік тому +2

      “Please provide all privileged information and your attorney work product regarding an ongoing prosecution.”
      “I legally can’t”
      “Then you’re hiding something!!!”
      This is basically what’s happened.

  • @DJRaid76
    @DJRaid76 Рік тому +9

    Garland, why did you make him special council if Mr. Weiss had all that power?

    • @Robert-er5wq
      @Robert-er5wq Рік тому +4

      Because Weiss applied to be special council. But why did Weiss apply so late? Is he a rookie who needs handholding? Another of those Trump appointees who have no qualifications whatsoever, like Judge Aileen Cannon in Florida? Trump made abysmal choices when it came to personnel

    • @t.j.mccowan6584
      @t.j.mccowan6584 Рік тому

      Thsnk you cause he new what he was doing

  • @fredbarrett5581
    @fredbarrett5581 9 місяців тому +1

    If this was you or I we’d be charged and jailed immediately.

  • @kramsemaj7869
    @kramsemaj7869 Рік тому +17

    I wasn't aware that the US had so many sharp judicial minds as evidenced by the comments.

    • @monsterwatchtruecrime
      @monsterwatchtruecrime Рік тому +3

      Doesn’t take a genius to smell bs.

    • @arap8844
      @arap8844 Рік тому

      Well, now you know.

    • @DaveG-kb2sr
      @DaveG-kb2sr Рік тому +1

      Wasn't aware the US had so many sharp minds willing to look the other way when their political faction is on the hot seat.

    • @monsterwatchtruecrime
      @monsterwatchtruecrime Рік тому +1

      @@DaveG-kb2sr the team sports mentality is killing this country. What happened to people thinking all politicians are trash?

    • @Robert-er5wq
      @Robert-er5wq Рік тому

      @@DaveG-kb2sr Yeah, they really need to deliver now the evidence since they started the impeachment... but they have none.

  • @GiGiGoesShopping
    @GiGiGoesShopping Рік тому +4

    Like an oily eel, slippery

  • @mikee3997
    @mikee3997 Рік тому +1

    If you or I did that on a gun form they find out right away and WE GET PROSECUTED fast

  • @shapeach
    @shapeach Рік тому +4

    Garland needs to recuse himself and stand trial for obstruction of justice under the Constitution.

    • @iamwell5654
      @iamwell5654 Рік тому +2

      😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
      Lol the constitution?? Ohhh that document that says if you so much as even support an insurrectionist you’re blocked from running for and holding ANY office in the land; yet here we are

    • @ethanweeter2732
      @ethanweeter2732 Рік тому +1

      He already refused by not getting involved. That is why you stay out of cases like that, so you cannot be accused of political interference or wrongdoing if you were not involved really.

    • @FriedChairs
      @FriedChairs Рік тому

      He’s said over and over he didn’t interfere with Weiss and Weiss said the same. Man, you guys are DENSE.

  • @artlessons6772
    @artlessons6772 Рік тому +6

    This man is amazing. He never answers a question and seems to get upset and really search for his words. The fact that Trump appointed him should have no bearing on this investigation.

  • @Arclight1988
    @Arclight1988 10 місяців тому +1

    Why do we have committee’s hearing? No one ever answers questions!

  • @RobbieStephenson-l3h
    @RobbieStephenson-l3h Рік тому +5

    Garland Knew the questions Nadler was asking. You could tell by the facial expressions. He was hard of hearing on the Republican Questions! Back it up and look at his face,

  • @timrussert1534
    @timrussert1534 Рік тому +8

    Is that really that heated? Clickbait article of the day.

    • @timm8263
      @timm8263 Рік тому +3

      Typical for fox spews.

  • @notadumbblond3
    @notadumbblond3 Рік тому +15

    They hide behind saying they can't discuss what they discussed if they discussed anything, but all they're asking for is, did you speak to him, and he won't answer that.
    They need to start saying we don't care what you discussed, but we need to know if you had any discussions with him. Yes, or no.

  • @romainebrown7249
    @romainebrown7249 9 місяців тому +1

    They sure didn't have any problem answering questions regarding Trump or anyone related to his administration and if they did answer questions they were held in contempt

  • @dundada7316
    @dundada7316 Рік тому +5

    You all wasted your time 😂, you will not get anything out of this guy. He knows the games 😂.

  • @ChynaSanto
    @ChynaSanto Рік тому +8

    How any time he has to go over that he had nothing to do with the attorney,'s discission

  • @TomCullen-wy4hb
    @TomCullen-wy4hb Рік тому +1

    Republican party especially the house need to start using the power of the purse it's that simple or we need to kick you out of office

  • @twwap294
    @twwap294 Рік тому +13

    Garland just perjured himself again to gonad ler.

  • @lisamanrique1770
    @lisamanrique1770 Рік тому +7

    Garland will weasel his way out of anything just to not give a direct answer!

    • @wysetech2000
      @wysetech2000 Рік тому

      He gave the answers several times. They were just trying to catch him in a lie.

  • @taylorstillman7932
    @taylorstillman7932 Рік тому +5

    "Trump appointed him"...no need to answer any questions from there... lol. Like everyone McDonald's hires is blindly aligned to everything McDonald's believes...
    Nadler playing bodyguard for Garland throughout the hearing was gross.

    • @joebright4607
      @joebright4607 Рік тому

      They neglected to mention that he was an associate of Bo Biden. Trump appointed people on recommendation from others, who were working against him from day one.

  • @ralts6464
    @ralts6464 Рік тому +17

    When you get asked question that in a court of law can be rejected lmao

    • @ethanweeter2732
      @ethanweeter2732 Рік тому

      Garland could invoke Executive Privilege or the Fifth Amendment if he wants.

    • @macsmith2013
      @macsmith2013 Рік тому

      @@ethanweeter2732 "Only the mob pleads the 5th" - Donald Trump

    • @FriedChairs
      @FriedChairs Рік тому

      @@macsmith2013 And yet Trump has plead the 5th dozens of times recently. I guess we know who is mob and who isn’t.

  • @mojo5571
    @mojo5571 10 місяців тому +1

    Tune in now for more Merrick Garland lies n cover ups !!!

  • @KaiserBlade
    @KaiserBlade Рік тому +5

    He makes believe he doesn't have to answer certain questions. He is obligated to answer Congress.

    • @rowell669
      @rowell669 Рік тому

      Jim Jordan is just as obligated and he refused a congressional subpeona and so did other republicans. At least Garland showed up which is more than republicans have done. They don’t even have real whistleblowers. They have disgruntled employees. This is just a joke. This is all they have! It’s nothing! Trump has 91 charges. Real charges. He lied every day he was in office, not to me, I knew he was lying. He lied to YOU! He makes a fool out of y’all. He thinks you’re a bunch of dopes he can exploit.

    • @nancygaffney8071
      @nancygaffney8071 Рік тому +1

      If they need to talk true security behind closed doors all Representatives present

    • @t.j.mccowan6584
      @t.j.mccowan6584 Рік тому

      Yet he didnt so he will pay one way or they other you think whin his job done he wont have gard time out public f.the fbi they clearly dishonest no honer and no integrity

  • @markferiole4749
    @markferiole4749 9 місяців тому +1

    MIKE JUST LOCK HIM UP....HIS BODY TELL THE HOLE STORY

  • @donovanbullock1785
    @donovanbullock1785 Рік тому +13

    Possible deniability it's how government works at its finest

  • @dreamwell2020
    @dreamwell2020 Рік тому +3

    When the inquisitors are this deranged, the exchange is bound to get heated.

  • @patriot1952-os6mh
    @patriot1952-os6mh 3 місяці тому +1

    ❤ BISHOP IS GETTING DOWN TO THE CORRUPTION, UNDER OATTH! ❤

  • @travisboatright7384
    @travisboatright7384 Рік тому +5

    All the things he listed would be better than what we have now with the FBI

  • @nosheeple2751
    @nosheeple2751 Рік тому +7

    IMPEACH, LOCK HIM UP

    • @sunnyramsey2753
      @sunnyramsey2753 Рік тому

      I agree tRump was impeached twice and should be LOCKED UP

    • @FriedChairs
      @FriedChairs Рік тому +2

      What did he say that was a lie?

  • @Gravesba8
    @Gravesba8 Рік тому +1

    any individual in a government position incapable of answering simple straight forward questions should be immediately removed from their office and face criminal charges for obstruction! too many people in important positions are only causing harm to the American people and should be removed accordingly! The military taught me best that "There is no such thing as an excuse!"

    • @wysetech2000
      @wysetech2000 Рік тому

      The military should have sent you for a mental exam.

  • @majesticmagnificfantastic4406
    @majesticmagnificfantastic4406 Рік тому +4

    Damn it , Garland!A simple Yes or No!

  • @terencegumbs2478
    @terencegumbs2478 Рік тому +4

    Why were potential crimes timed out? What a fool.

  • @dailyvictory6656
    @dailyvictory6656 Рік тому +5

    He promised not to snitch. Cool

  • @terencegumbs2478
    @terencegumbs2478 Рік тому +7

    Garland, you do not give Special Counsel status to the incompetent.

    • @mattalibozek7258
      @mattalibozek7258 Рік тому +4

      Trump hired the guy in the first place… 😂

    • @terencegumbs2478
      @terencegumbs2478 Рік тому +1

      @@mattalibozek7258 Trump hired many swamp creatures, it doesn't change the fact that they are hopeless.

    • @Gabbyness41
      @Gabbyness41 Рік тому

      AND, it was he who asked Garland to be special prosecutor and Garland approved. But, oh, what a horribly complicit man in the DOJ because he didn’t hire his own investigators when he could’ve. Biden could’ve taken Weiss off the case AND DIDN’T!

  • @stayclean777
    @stayclean777 Рік тому +4

    The GOP needs to change its shorts.

  • @marissaville9392
    @marissaville9392 Рік тому +10

    He said he promised to the senators. Who are those senators??? DemocrTs? Republican?

  • @richardgodfrey5593
    @richardgodfrey5593 Рік тому +1

    Garland believes in his own legendary tale.

  • @adudedisguisedasadudeplayi8491
    @adudedisguisedasadudeplayi8491 Рік тому +21

    What happened to yes and no?

    • @karenwaddell9396
      @karenwaddell9396 Рік тому +6

      Yes and no cannot answer these questions in full.

    • @adudedisguisedasadudeplayi8491
      @adudedisguisedasadudeplayi8491 Рік тому +2

      @@karenwaddell9396 when the question was leading to answer yes and no?

    • @Geewasright
      @Geewasright Рік тому +8

      He could’ve just pled the 5th 400 times like Trump.

    • @adudedisguisedasadudeplayi8491
      @adudedisguisedasadudeplayi8491 Рік тому +2

      @@Geewasright that’s court questions? that’s questions being questioned by Congress for not doing your job? obviously someone in court that is not guilty would of plead the fifth?

    • @geelee1977
      @geelee1977 Рік тому +4

      "What happened to yes and no?" --> The complex question fallacy from the G0P happened. It is committed when someone asks a question that touches upon more than one issue, yet allows only for one answer. Garland is too smart to fall for that, as any attorney worth their bar exam would be.

  • @lukhese8974
    @lukhese8974 Рік тому +10

    Garland likes to answer only certain selective questions, he trying to use weiss by not answering anything, i bet when they speak to weiss he will bring up garlands name

    • @peaceloveharmony7213
      @peaceloveharmony7213 Рік тому +6

      Did you even watch this video? He answered everything, even with explanation. Maybe you don’t understand words. Poor comprehension skills?

    • @lukhese8974
      @lukhese8974 Рік тому

      @@peaceloveharmony7213 did you watch the video , did he answer the questions, he dodged most of them and only answers the easy ones

    • @Murchad99
      @Murchad99 Рік тому

      @@lukhese8974 Did YOU watch the video? He explained why he wasn't answering questions that required him to discuss internal workings of an ongoing investigation, or make judgments or critical statements about said investigation, both of which would be interference... which he committed to avoiding.
      If Weiss was trying to put Hunter Biden in jail for life for minor crimes and Democrats called him to discuss the case, you'd be F-F-F-F-F-FURIOUS!

  • @DJ-jl5tn
    @DJ-jl5tn Рік тому +2

    Supreme Court would have been a life time appointment

    • @paulthomas5860
      @paulthomas5860 Рік тому

      Every time I hear anything about dee OHJ, C YI Yay…P0t0US senate, … any fed action or anything inaction (border) election, … I think of that…

    • @paulthomas5860
      @paulthomas5860 Рік тому

      Scary….