I like these ideas. The idea of more courtyards for apartment buildings can provide better communal space, places to have a common garden, play area and such. I like the reasoning behind 4-story buildings being the ideal size. I think that should be adopted by more urban planning departments. I like the general idea of opening suburb yard space to create a better connection to neighbours. However, I do wonder a few things: What about this design in cold climates that get a lot of snow in the winter? Like, where I am from, there can be a LOT of snow on the ground and what would happen to the courtyard space? Would the snow have a good place to drain? Or maybe there is a use for that snow, like collection to a tank for plant watering later in the year? What about people's pets? The fences people have sometimes make it easier for the dogs to be let out in the backyard, do their thing and then come back to the house safely. And what if people still DO want some privacy? I'm a pretty minimalistic person and enjoy a good bit of community time, but once I got to stay in a condo with a small pool in the backyard with my family. It was fenced off and so we used it whenever we wanted. It was really nice and comfortable. It wasn't an extravagant pool/hot tub but it was really nice to just have that bit of privacy and self-control over when and how we used it. So, I'm all for more access for people, because now, back at home, I definitely don't have my own pool, but sometimes it would be nice to know of a close-by pool I could rent out and use sometimes, but with permission. I guess I'd just like to see more acknowledgement of questions and concerns that might be raised from these cool, innovative ideas.
This is not a bad idea. If every block or two was with an inner court where children could play safely while grand parents could sit and read it would be a great idea for all future building projects and for renos of past mistakes.
That would definitely be really cool. There's often a perceived tension between having inexpensive apartments, green space, and quiet. But this is a really elegant solution.
This has much of the original Barcelona superblocks as they were intended. While they are still a great example of communal building, they are not anymore as they were intended, which makes me kinda sad. It looked like a concept where you dont need to change anything but only expand the city if needed. Then again, I'm not a professional when it comes to city planning or architecture.
Born in Romania, I had a childhood and neighborhood exactly as described here. I loved it. Now living in Pasadena, CA, I only know 1 neighbor, but I've never had a meal with any of them. It feels very isolating.
It happened something similar to me when I moved from Seville to Madrid. I always blamed it on the cultural differences but Seville urban structure actually has almost everything the architects were talking about.
That is a big difference and a bummer. I think that times have changed within the US itself, too. When I grew up in the 80s and 90s, we knew most of our neighbors up and down the street, the kids played together, my next door neighbor was the neighborhood babysitter, we looked after each other's houses when one neighbor was out of town, and when developers were planning to ruin the neighborhood, neighbors came together to fight the development. Now, I barely know or talk to any of my neighbors and dislike some of them due to noise, rudeness, etc. I only know one person's name. I live in a different place but I think that's a pretty common experience across the US.
@@tkfg331 I agree. I think it's getting even more extreme and isolating with social media. Or is it anti-social media? Just wait for VR and the metaverse and robots. I think it'll get even worse.
I lived in many neighborhoods like from the video with mid rise buildings and their own inside yards in Eastern Europe but I never knew my neighbors or never saw any collective work in the community so I think you can have a great involved neighborhood with single family houses or dense buildings, tho the US would benefit from building more dense neighborhoods because it would create more affordable housing and take some cars from the road but it doesn’t really change the fact if you know your neighborhoods or not
As a North American who has lived in both Copenhagen and Berlin, I can safely say that a thoughtful, mixed-use, multi-modal, approach to housing is objectively better for residents. It's so sad moving back and seeing endless rows of soulless suburbs.
I've got a friend whose family owned a couple houses next to each other. They joined their back yards and made a gorgeous 'park' which is greater than the sum of its parts. Honestly, I wish more people could do that.
Love seeing people in neighborhoods creating their own spaces in response to a planning layout that ignores, by design, what most would probably prefer. I'm a fan of this type of content, so you've made a subscriber out of me. Thanks for the post.
I LOVE this episode. I just purchased a single family home, but was partially sad that I wouldn't have some connection. I really like that project where the 4 neighbors created a common space in their backyards. I hope to have a similar experience.
that’s why i want to be an urban planner to do things like this. i know it will be hard, because american lawmakers are all paid off by oil/car companies. they don’t want these communities, because it makes them less money.
@@fl0pZ3 You've got an uphill battle because there is pressure to be cut and paste, or like our cityplanner take money under the table to approve really crappy variances.
Great video! The balconies in Europe! I remember a meme from early covid during quarantine, after those videos of neighbors playing music together from their balconies, which said, "We get it Europe, you all have balconies!" The Oakland community looks really cool. There's an artist in Fresno who did something similar with her neighbors and it's amazing, a green oasis in the midst of the concrete desert jungle. Anyway, great alternatives and examples in this video. PS Solarpunk
This reminds me of something the video game historian referenced in his tribute to the life of Satoru Iwata, it's an anecdote from the relationship between Shigeru Miyamoto and Iwata wherein the lesson is that if you make something that people don't "get" then it is 100% your fault. I will add to that by saying that we must design better. Not to be admired by fellow designers, or to satisfy our own vanity but for the betterment of both those who will use our creations and those who will be exposed to them. The question must always be, how does this design facilitate the betterment of life for the people who will incorporate it into their lives. Boots on the ground, then pencil to plan.
I think a good experiment for urban planners is to just leave out empty patches of land/ space and allow the people to utilize and shape it in the ways they need and want it - and not design everything to have a predetermined purpose. It's a good alternative if planners cannot have a good involvement of the occupants while a place is still being planned out.
Yea and if the city wants some more developed structure in that space, first let the people do with the land as they please and then get proper builders/construction in to build a "to code" space
That's basically where modern planning is headed toward, at least with regard to land uses. Now we're looking at form-based codes, which covers a lot of what this video brings up: building heights, alleyways, courtyards, balcony requirements, etc. It really emphasizes how people experience the built environment and let's developers and stakeholders fill-in the gaps with what kinds of things the neighborhood (or market) wants.
That's a really cool idea - and isn't far off how cities used to be built (and still are in places like favelas). In many countries, zoning really restricts flexibility and means that places can't adapt to new needs or opportunities that arise after the plan is created. But as @AAA mentions, Japan has a very different approach that has been very successful, allowing more walkable and pleasant communities--with surprisingly reasonable housing costs, as well. urbankchoze.blogspot.com/2014/04/japanese-zoning.html
@@Ccnytro That is not true, modern planning is based on displacement ! how disconnected of real word can you be , cities always have been places of displacement.
I predict in the future we will see more community based efforts to build their neighborhoods into a desirable living space. As architects may have to settle and listen to people on what they want vs the egocentric mindset of the delusion greedy architects. A community based neighborhood is greener, more sustainable and you know your local neighbors.. This is called, micro communities. This often depicts a future of a SolarPunk narrative, a community based effort to help each other rather then competing or fighting against one another.
People need People. Here in America, we have ignored that and promoted isolation. Now, most of the country hates each other, and depression and suicide rates are as high as ever. And to make matters worse, Covid sped that idea of isolation up ever faster.
Great video! Super interesting explanation and cool visuals. The favela like area in Argentina looks very communal and seems like a great space for families
Halfway through I immediately made the connection of getting rid of fences in neighborhoods. It's something I've been thinking about for a while now. It's basically a courtyard for the suburbs. It would work better in more organicly shaped neighborhoods, as opposed to grid like neighborhoods.
These are excellent ideas! The first step, at least in most of the US, will have to be allowing the people who live in a home to have property rights to the home. If people don't have the agency to customize their backyards then its likely due to landlords or corporate powers having the rights to land they don't personally use except for profit.
Mayra Madriz is my hero! Finally someone else speaking up for the ideas and contributions of the regular people and calling out the elitism of central planning. And she's in California, the capital of "Government should decide things for people and no such thing as fees that are too high and bad restrictions"
I think it's important to know how to desingn places to make them lveable, but it's also the key to know WHERE they're going to be and what kind of uses are going to provide. This would give a more holistic vision of human assentments and the way they function, and in this case the role of and architect but also a GEOGRAPHER would be the solution. Traditionally the profession of the geographer has not been recognized beyond teaching, but we deserve a greater weight in decision-making and contribute in other ways to society.
Walking and biking is very difficult in most suburbs of America. My neighborhood is cut off by a large avenue with only 3 cross walks to access the park. It's very dangerous and very uncomfortable to cross. I would love to use my bike more often when going to the market and things like that, but the only sidewalk available connecting my home and the markets is a tiny sidewalk nestled alongside a very congested avenue.
If we could have shared backyards, bigger front porches, community gardens, and community land trusts with and protected sidewalks/ bike lanes to schools and main streets - Our American culture and consciousness could dramatically shift.
So density, and a communion feel is retired for culture to grow, however I feel as though you are missing something out, walk-ability and bike-ability of a city I know it's outside of your control but still I thought to mention it. Both of these will make the streets feel more communal (with density) due to the less cars on the road.
Austin and Atlanta (belt-line neighborhoods) need to be the blueprints but we have to build greener, more unique buildings, higher and more affordable.
I have lived on the belt line in Atlanta and Austin. The happiest I have ever been in my life was living on a belt line with access to every restaurant, parks, bar, work, etc. no car needed. Just a bike. Tons of community events. Free movie nights and yoga and blues on the greens. Sadly the lowest rent reached 2,000 dollars for a studio and now it’s become less and less realistic.
Until tort laws are changed, sharing one's yard with others is risky for the owners. Any injury opens up a property owner to financial liability. Who has say on use? What if you have an unruly neighbor who is out of control and has little respect for others sharing the common space? There are many questions that have to be addressed. If not, this utopian idea will turn into another failure.
The 20th and 21st centuries have been plagued by the arrogant architect who designs despite the wishes of the community, who creates environments people do not like and sees that as a positive, because they know and the commoner does not.
Subhodayam. "We may impress others through effective speaking. But let us understand the truth. The gist of the truth is good action. Let us have courage to act honestly. Sri Swamy Samarth Ramdas in Sri Manache Shlok (152). In today's media and advertising dominated world, many things masquerade as the absolute truth. Reality is, truth needs no selling! The more the noise, the more the deviation. Be honest, be truthful, be sincere. Whatever be the situation, your conduct makes the difference. Remember, truth eventually prevails! God bless us all.
Marvelous in the simplicity of the concept, incredibly challenging if not nearly impossible in reality. Zoning codes, building codes, fire separations, emergency responders access, disabled access, etc., all of these things need to come together and be resolved to achieve this idea. Can this be done? Certainly it can. However, many of these organic communities where people are allowed to build their own spaces need to be done in such a way to protect the life safety and well-being of all residents, visitors, and the general public need to be carefully considered. If someone, accidentally, starts a fire in their residence what prevents the whole community from going up in flames. Does the neighborhood come together and pay for replacing the lost residence. These are all issues that often take years to resolve. Our laws and codes are their for a reason but they will complicate the spontaneity of creation of these types of communities.
Hmmm disagree.. it's about the person too me. DC made Brand New beautiful public housing that actually has setups similar to this...... You should see it now.
Mf's around the world should learn from cities like barcelona and paris car free or speed limit streets with mid rises and pedestrian friendly architecture Midrises also consume a lot less energy than a single family home and skyscraper they can be built using sustainable and crabon negative materials and if combined with suitable neighborhoods can offer amazing social and quality life for a lot less money as once we are fulfilled from inside are material cravings reduce alot ❤
I think 4 is a luxury that a very sparse country like the US can afford. It’s dense enough to support public transit but not too dense so as to feel crowded or isolating. With city states like singapore and denser countries, you probably want to optimize with more stories, but I don’t think it’s absolutely necessary.
Yeah, i’m not made for the city. I’ll have the house in nature without neighbours/passersby gawking through my windows and where the line between personal and communal space isn’t drawn right at my front door.
As an introvert, I think it would be nice to have a house where one yard (the front or back) is shared and the other half of the yard is fenced-in and private. That way, I can choose when to be outdoors in a quiet, private space, and when to go into a shared outdoor space where I might encounter people. It would be the best of both worlds.
It's shared culture that connects people not architecture. You can have architecture meant to isolate but if the people actually like each other they'll connect and on the other end you can have architecture meant to connect but no one wants to talk to their neighbours.
Missing the whole point. A community of shared culture in an isolated environment is still going to be more disconnected than in one meant for connection. Also I reject the idea that a culturally diverse environment creates isolation.
This year, some Trump types bought one of the homes and have Trumpian meetups, wear those MAGA hats and invite over friends from their 'megachurch'. Now what do you think about the magic?
This video is a soft cell for Agenda 2030's neighborhood unit planning, with the future intent of having neighborhood committees making decisions and providing the minimal needs of families.
To all of you people who are against the idea of living in a dense, shared community because you prefer to have privacy and separation from obnoxious neighbors: That’s just fine, you can keep living in your isolated neighborhoods if that’s what you think is within your interests. But that doesn’t mean shared communities shouldn’t exist for anyone. There should still be a choice between the two. No one is trying to force you to live in a space shared with your neighbors that you don’t want to live in. We are simply trying to make these neighborhoods an option for those who actually want to live in them.
@@ryansmith290 it feels like it's really in the zeitgeist. A lot of cities are re-evaluating how to be more livable, sustainable, affordable. Hopefully people can bring these ideas to cities and towns all over!
Baugruppen. Common in Germany. Multi-family homes cenetered around shared amenities like a communal kitchen and courtyard. My dream. Affordable living close to people in a similar life stage.
1:37 David Sim says the ideal height of a building is 4 stories and proceeds to list out the reasons why but doesn't get into any reason why any multi story building whether it be 2 to 100 stories is a negative to the human experience. But then again, he is an "urban expert". Let's go "first principles" on the concept of a city. buildings whether they are 4 stories or 10 stories will block out the natural landscape and sky. Not great. Also having strangers live above, to the side and above you. Also not great. Overall all lack of privacy. Lots of compromise. Let's also consider the friction that is generated between the different modes of transportation within a city (bike, walking, car, tram). Then again, I have a problem with core fundamental aspects of reality. Primarily the fact that teleportation doesn't exist. This very fact causes so many damn problems.
Yes, I understand this concept as we live in a society that embodies much of this philosophy. But there is a danger if the philosophy is not managed or implemented correct. One example is if the implementation creates a tribal effect, which would create more conflict and less inclusivity.
Do you like this approach to building neighborhoods?
myeah
Yep. A lot.
soviet mikrodistrik vs usa sub urban
1:37 Khrushchyovka have 5 stories building.
7:26 incredible rich
I like these ideas. The idea of more courtyards for apartment buildings can provide better communal space, places to have a common garden, play area and such. I like the reasoning behind 4-story buildings being the ideal size. I think that should be adopted by more urban planning departments. I like the general idea of opening suburb yard space to create a better connection to neighbours.
However, I do wonder a few things: What about this design in cold climates that get a lot of snow in the winter? Like, where I am from, there can be a LOT of snow on the ground and what would happen to the courtyard space? Would the snow have a good place to drain? Or maybe there is a use for that snow, like collection to a tank for plant watering later in the year?
What about people's pets? The fences people have sometimes make it easier for the dogs to be let out in the backyard, do their thing and then come back to the house safely. And what if people still DO want some privacy? I'm a pretty minimalistic person and enjoy a good bit of community time, but once I got to stay in a condo with a small pool in the backyard with my family. It was fenced off and so we used it whenever we wanted. It was really nice and comfortable. It wasn't an extravagant pool/hot tub but it was really nice to just have that bit of privacy and self-control over when and how we used it. So, I'm all for more access for people, because now, back at home, I definitely don't have my own pool, but sometimes it would be nice to know of a close-by pool I could rent out and use sometimes, but with permission.
I guess I'd just like to see more acknowledgement of questions and concerns that might be raised from these cool, innovative ideas.
HELL YEAH I LOVE THIS SERIES
This is not a bad idea. If every block or two was with an inner court where children could play safely while grand parents could sit and read it would be a great idea for all future building projects and for renos of past mistakes.
That would definitely be really cool. There's often a perceived tension between having inexpensive apartments, green space, and quiet. But this is a really elegant solution.
This has much of the original Barcelona superblocks as they were intended. While they are still a great example of communal building, they are not anymore as they were intended, which makes me kinda sad. It looked like a concept where you dont need to change anything but only expand the city if needed. Then again, I'm not a professional when it comes to city planning or architecture.
Well... Welcome to Europe?
Sounds exactly like where I lived in China! Loved our life there! (Edit: obviously except the height! The buildings were much taller than 4 stories!)
@@Gabrong Just came to say this is pretty much the standard in Europe, I see you beat me to it, köszönöm.
Born in Romania, I had a childhood and neighborhood exactly as described here. I loved it.
Now living in Pasadena, CA, I only know 1 neighbor, but I've never had a meal with any of them. It feels very isolating.
It happened something similar to me when I moved from Seville to Madrid. I always blamed it on the cultural differences but Seville urban structure actually has almost everything the architects were talking about.
That is a big difference and a bummer. I think that times have changed within the US itself, too. When I grew up in the 80s and 90s, we knew most of our neighbors up and down the street, the kids played together, my next door neighbor was the neighborhood babysitter, we looked after each other's houses when one neighbor was out of town, and when developers were planning to ruin the neighborhood, neighbors came together to fight the development. Now, I barely know or talk to any of my neighbors and dislike some of them due to noise, rudeness, etc. I only know one person's name. I live in a different place but I think that's a pretty common experience across the US.
@@pongop : What you are saying makes complete sense. I think this is happening perhaps all over the world as video games and TicTok take over.
@@tkfg331 I agree. I think it's getting even more extreme and isolating with social media. Or is it anti-social media? Just wait for VR and the metaverse and robots. I think it'll get even worse.
I lived in many neighborhoods like from the video with mid rise buildings and their own inside yards in Eastern Europe but I never knew my neighbors or never saw any collective work in the community so I think you can have a great involved neighborhood with single family houses or dense buildings, tho the US would benefit from building more dense neighborhoods because it would create more affordable housing and take some cars from the road but it doesn’t really change the fact if you know your neighborhoods or not
As a North American who has lived in both Copenhagen and Berlin, I can safely say that a thoughtful, mixed-use, multi-modal, approach to housing is objectively better for residents. It's so sad moving back and seeing endless rows of soulless suburbs.
I've got a friend whose family owned a couple houses next to each other. They joined their back yards and made a gorgeous 'park' which is greater than the sum of its parts. Honestly, I wish more people could do that.
Why is it greater? Says who?
@@topsuperseven7910 says me. And because the larger area allows for paths structures and water features too large to fit in one yard.
@@limbodog "Its bigger space for single bigger stuff.
wow you're a real genius. we may need your advice on terraforming mars or organizing cupboards.
@@topsuperseven7910 I don't knew what you were expecting. But you sound like a petulant child
@@topsuperseven7910 wow, how unnecessarily unpleasant
I like how the dude is called David Sim. He is basically designing a real Sim City.
Lol. "You merely adopted Sim City, I was born into it"
He wrote the book called Soft City, which is like the Bible for urban planners.
@@tonysoviet3692 The title of his book is a bit flaccid in my opinion, but I can see where he was going with it. 😅
Love seeing people in neighborhoods creating their own spaces in response to a planning layout that ignores, by design, what most would probably prefer. I'm a fan of this type of content, so you've made a subscriber out of me. Thanks for the post.
Can i recommend you funny Science-UA-camrs?
Or is that offer too random?
I LOVE this episode. I just purchased a single family home, but was partially sad that I wouldn't have some connection. I really like that project where the 4 neighbors created a common space in their backyards. I hope to have a similar experience.
I prefer townhouses for that reason
I’m with ya!!! We bought a SF detached at the beginning of lock-down and I love the quiet…but I hate being so far away from places and people.
7:00 wtf how does that CGI look so good
It’s probably Unreal Engine 4 or 5.
Right?! I thought it was part of the yard at first!
Yes, that stumped me for a bit. Like "Why do they have that giant sign in their yard?" Ahhh.
This is great. You guys should check out what Culdesac is doing in Arizona. Great startup, similar spirit and mission.
Thanks for the rec! Really interesting to see all the creative efforts going on in this space right now.
Why live in neighborhoods we dislike? Because we are told by government planners this is what we must do it.
that’s why i want to be an urban planner to do things like this. i know it will be hard, because american lawmakers are all paid off by oil/car companies. they don’t want these communities, because it makes them less money.
@@fl0pZ3
You've got an uphill battle because there is pressure to be cut and paste, or like our cityplanner take money under the table to approve really crappy variances.
No, that's just all there is, because rich people looking to make a quick buck have their grubby fingers all over the real estate market
Too bad NIMBYs in the US would shut these ideas all the way down
And HOAs
Great video! The balconies in Europe! I remember a meme from early covid during quarantine, after those videos of neighbors playing music together from their balconies, which said, "We get it Europe, you all have balconies!" The Oakland community looks really cool. There's an artist in Fresno who did something similar with her neighbors and it's amazing, a green oasis in the midst of the concrete desert jungle. Anyway, great alternatives and examples in this video. PS Solarpunk
In short : quiet court yards behind buildings.
No one is talking about how nice the narrators voice is. Another wonderful video from freethink
I say something about him pretty much every video his in, probably my favorite narrator from freethink.
The narrator sounds almost like the guy running ‘Not just bikes’ channel.
@@carthick1000 I can see that a little bit
The community park the neighbours created in Oakland looks amazing.
Good. Cities need to enhance social bonds and sense of freedom for people.
People build places they don’t want to live in because the people building them (as in, funding the building of them) don’t live there.
love how the oakland dudes had an idea and made something so amazing happen.
Yes it's awesome, although I think it could be a little more orderly and organized
@@greenmachine5600 "you think" maybe to me them its organized and orderly, ever thought about that?
This reminds me of something the video game historian referenced in his tribute to the life of Satoru Iwata, it's an anecdote from the relationship between
Shigeru Miyamoto and Iwata wherein the lesson is that if you make something that people don't "get" then it is 100% your fault. I will add to that by saying that we must design better. Not to be admired by fellow designers, or to satisfy our own vanity but for the betterment of both those who will use our creations and those who will be exposed to them. The question must always be, how does this design facilitate the betterment of life for the people who will incorporate it into their lives. Boots on the ground, then pencil to plan.
I think a good experiment for urban planners is to just leave out empty patches of land/ space and allow the people to utilize and shape it in the ways they need and want it - and not design everything to have a predetermined purpose. It's a good alternative if planners cannot have a good involvement of the occupants while a place is still being planned out.
Yea and if the city wants some more developed structure in that space, first let the people do with the land as they please and then get proper builders/construction in to build a "to code" space
That's basically where modern planning is headed toward, at least with regard to land uses. Now we're looking at form-based codes, which covers a lot of what this video brings up: building heights, alleyways, courtyards, balcony requirements, etc. It really emphasizes how people experience the built environment and let's developers and stakeholders fill-in the gaps with what kinds of things the neighborhood (or market) wants.
That's basically what Tokyo is, and I love it
That's a really cool idea - and isn't far off how cities used to be built (and still are in places like favelas). In many countries, zoning really restricts flexibility and means that places can't adapt to new needs or opportunities that arise after the plan is created. But as @AAA mentions, Japan has a very different approach that has been very successful, allowing more walkable and pleasant communities--with surprisingly reasonable housing costs, as well. urbankchoze.blogspot.com/2014/04/japanese-zoning.html
@@Ccnytro That is not true, modern planning is based on displacement ! how disconnected of real word can you be , cities always have been places of displacement.
I predict in the future we will see more community based efforts to build their neighborhoods into a desirable living space.
As architects may have to settle and listen to people on what they want vs the egocentric mindset of the delusion greedy architects.
A community based neighborhood is greener, more sustainable and you know your local neighbors..
This is called, micro communities.
This often depicts a future of a SolarPunk narrative, a community based effort to help each other rather then competing or fighting against one another.
People need People. Here in America, we have ignored that and promoted isolation. Now, most of the country hates each other, and depression and suicide rates are as high as ever. And to make matters worse, Covid sped that idea of isolation up ever faster.
Great video! Super interesting explanation and cool visuals. The favela like area in Argentina looks very communal and seems like a great space for families
Halfway through I immediately made the connection of getting rid of fences in neighborhoods. It's something I've been thinking about for a while now. It's basically a courtyard for the suburbs. It would work better in more organicly shaped neighborhoods, as opposed to grid like neighborhoods.
Is the interviewee okay? Almost sounds in distress.
These are excellent ideas! The first step, at least in most of the US, will have to be allowing the people who live in a home to have property rights to the home. If people don't have the agency to customize their backyards then its likely due to landlords or corporate powers having the rights to land they don't personally use except for profit.
ideal architecture would be such that is equally beneficial to nature as it is to us
Mayra Madriz is my hero! Finally someone else speaking up for the ideas and contributions of the regular people and calling out the elitism of central planning. And she's in California, the capital of "Government should decide things for people and no such thing as fees that are too high and bad restrictions"
That guy has the same voice as crying Jordan Peterson
I think it's important to know how to desingn places to make them lveable, but it's also the key to know WHERE they're going to be and what kind of uses are going to provide. This would give a more holistic vision of human assentments and the way they function, and in this case the role of and architect but also a GEOGRAPHER would be the solution.
Traditionally the profession of the geographer has not been recognized beyond teaching, but we deserve a greater weight in decision-making and contribute in other ways to society.
Walking and biking is very difficult in most suburbs of America. My neighborhood is cut off by a large avenue with only 3 cross walks to access the park. It's very dangerous and very uncomfortable to cross. I would love to use my bike more often when going to the market and things like that, but the only sidewalk available connecting my home and the markets is a tiny sidewalk nestled alongside a very congested avenue.
i live in an apartment. i don't like people.... i would be glad to live on the 9th floor where the road noise isn't that loud as here in the 4th floor
Those urban planners completely forgot about introverted people. I guess their city isn't for everyone like they say it is.
Your misanthropy is most likely a product of our dysfunctional, disconnected world. Something to be solved, not accepted.
@@user-xi4nz3be1x you can't force people to "solve" problems you've diagnosed them with. live and let live.
@@snowcloudshinobiNot liking people as a whole is not normal human behavior. We are social creatures.
@@user-xi4nz3be1x not all people are "normal" and just want to be left alone.
If we could have shared backyards, bigger front porches, community gardens, and community land trusts with and protected sidewalks/ bike lanes to schools and main streets - Our American culture and consciousness could dramatically shift.
We totally agree.
love this, so inspiring
It's called mixed-use zoning
great channel, im subbed before 1mil subs
Balconies are so important. It's a bit of extra freedom. Space to dream, but not your bed.
So density, and a communion feel is retired for culture to grow, however I feel as though you are missing something out, walk-ability and bike-ability of a city I know it's outside of your control but still I thought to mention it.
Both of these will make the streets feel more communal (with density) due to the less cars on the road.
I'm really sorry, but your voice is making me cry
Great video and great ideas
Austin and Atlanta (belt-line neighborhoods) need to be the blueprints but we have to build greener, more unique buildings, higher and more affordable.
I have lived on the belt line in Atlanta and Austin. The happiest I have ever been in my life was living on a belt line with access to every restaurant, parks, bar, work, etc. no car needed. Just a bike. Tons of community events. Free movie nights and yoga and blues on the greens. Sadly the lowest rent reached 2,000 dollars for a studio and now it’s become less and less realistic.
You should have waited with the interview until he is well again :-) It is very hard listening to him... Amazing information, but bad voice.
Until tort laws are changed, sharing one's yard with others is risky for the owners. Any injury opens up a property owner to financial liability. Who has say on use? What if you have an unruly neighbor who is out of control and has little respect for others sharing the common space? There are many questions that have to be addressed. If not, this utopian idea will turn into another failure.
we need balconies because everyone needs to have access to outdoor spaces
Yes, it’s a human right....
Is it not legally required?
I was honestly hoping to hear the person who was interviewed say “oh bother” or “Christopher Robin”
The 20th and 21st centuries have been plagued by the arrogant architect who designs despite the wishes of the community, who creates environments people do not like and sees that as a positive, because they know and the commoner does not.
Always Great Content 👨🌾
Appreciate that!
We need to build more places where people want to be
I have made sure to always rent an apartment with a balcony
this is so good. love it
I love that someone actually made a fusion backyard with their neighbors.
Man was a screamo fan in his youth
Subhodayam.
"We may impress others through effective speaking. But let us understand the truth. The gist of the truth is good action. Let us have courage to act honestly. Sri Swamy Samarth Ramdas in Sri Manache Shlok (152).
In today's media and advertising dominated world, many things masquerade as the absolute truth. Reality is, truth needs no selling! The more the noise, the more the deviation.
Be honest, be truthful, be sincere. Whatever be the situation, your conduct makes the difference. Remember, truth eventually prevails!
God bless us all.
Marvelous in the simplicity of the concept, incredibly challenging if not nearly impossible in reality. Zoning codes, building codes, fire separations, emergency responders access, disabled access, etc., all of these things need to come together and be resolved to achieve this idea. Can this be done? Certainly it can. However, many of these organic communities where people are allowed to build their own spaces need to be done in such a way to protect the life safety and well-being of all residents, visitors, and the general public need to be carefully considered. If someone, accidentally, starts a fire in their residence what prevents the whole community from going up in flames. Does the neighborhood come together and pay for replacing the lost residence. These are all issues that often take years to resolve. Our laws and codes are their for a reason but they will complicate the spontaneity of creation of these types of communities.
Great video on the impact your neighbourhood has on the quality of life of individuals and the community.
Hmmm disagree.. it's about the person too me. DC made Brand New beautiful public housing that actually has setups similar to this...... You should see it now.
Where does Jan Gehl live? Does he live in a single family home or in one of his multi-family projects?
Where’s Chuck Marohn and Nassim Taleb?
Why Taleb? To my knowledge he hasn't written about city planning.
@@yeetdeets He’s the one behind Chuck’s thinking and his thinking is actually pretty cool. Jeff Speck is also an obvious choice.
I think 4 stories is a bit too tall. Rowhouses of 3 stories would be great instead of apartments
Because the people who build where the 99% have to live, DON'T HAVE TO LIVE THERE.
That David dude has an annoying voice! Outside of that, he's doing amazing work👍
Mf's around the world should learn from cities like barcelona and paris car free or speed limit streets with mid rises and pedestrian friendly architecture
Midrises also consume a lot less energy than a single family home and skyscraper they can be built using sustainable and crabon negative materials and if combined with suitable neighborhoods can offer amazing social and quality life for a lot less money as once we are fulfilled from inside are material cravings reduce alot ❤
Still think 4 stories is too low. I think higher would be accommodate more people and leave more space for nature and shared amenities, like Singapore
It definitely depends on the area! For an American suburb, 4 is good. But for a big city like Singapore, 8-12 stories works better.
I think 4 is a luxury that a very sparse country like the US can afford. It’s dense enough to support public transit but not too dense so as to feel crowded or isolating. With city states like singapore and denser countries, you probably want to optimize with more stories, but I don’t think it’s absolutely necessary.
The guy sounds like death warmed over... Hope he's ok
i dont see demerits of not seeing my neighborhoods everyday
Yeah, i’m not made for the city.
I’ll have the house in nature without neighbours/passersby gawking through my windows and where the line between personal and communal space isn’t drawn right at my front door.
Way to go!
Bro sounds like someone trying to do a Gary Vee impression
The courtyard is dying in Denmark though.
Sounds kinda like Barcelona super blocks
nice vid but that voice bra i cabt stabd listen to this
why is his voice like that? no offense
As an introvert, I think it would be nice to have a house where one yard (the front or back) is shared and the other half of the yard is fenced-in and private. That way, I can choose when to be outdoors in a quiet, private space, and when to go into a shared outdoor space where I might encounter people. It would be the best of both worlds.
Private rooftops or terraces could also help
Yes humans like having enough land to walk around.
I love this!
That was a great video that I would have never thought about!!
And where is this apartment located?
It's shared culture that connects people not architecture. You can have architecture meant to isolate but if the people actually like each other they'll connect and on the other end you can have architecture meant to connect but no one wants to talk to their neighbours.
Culture is flexible and naturaly changing, no?
@@gunjfur8633Emphasis on naturally. It's extremely difficult, slow and painful to successfully change culture artificially.
@@zinjanthropus322
Artificially?
@@gunjfur8633 Yes, top down attempts at cultural change like through architectural projects.
Missing the whole point. A community of shared culture in an isolated environment is still going to be more disconnected than in one meant for connection. Also I reject the idea that a culturally diverse environment creates isolation.
common shared areas are great except that they invite HOAs. HOAs are a red line and can not be part of the solution.
I absolutely love the place in CA where 4 neighbors combined their backyards and created a magical common space.
This year, some Trump types bought one of the homes and have Trumpian meetups, wear those MAGA hats and invite over friends from their 'megachurch'. Now what do you think about the magic?
This video is a soft cell for Agenda 2030's neighborhood unit planning, with the future intent of having neighborhood committees making decisions and providing the minimal needs of families.
To all of you people who are against the idea of living in a dense, shared community because you prefer to have privacy and separation from obnoxious neighbors:
That’s just fine, you can keep living in your isolated neighborhoods if that’s what you think is within your interests. But that doesn’t mean shared communities shouldn’t exist for anyone. There should still be a choice between the two.
No one is trying to force you to live in a space shared with your neighbors that you don’t want to live in. We are simply trying to make these neighborhoods an option for those who actually want to live in them.
that man needs to drink some water
I think the dude's got strep thropat or somethin.
damn im so early. its only been uploaded 10 minutes ago
I was just thinking about this earlier this week on what makes an ideal community and what amenities people wanted
@@ryansmith290 it feels like it's really in the zeitgeist. A lot of cities are re-evaluating how to be more livable, sustainable, affordable. Hopefully people can bring these ideas to cities and towns all over!
because it's not humans designing it, it's profit.
Please do more videos from Gehl!
The look of the buildings is very weighty. We cannot have ugly modernist buildings anymore. We need traditional White architecture.
Baugruppen. Common in Germany. Multi-family homes cenetered around shared amenities like a communal kitchen and courtyard.
My dream. Affordable living close to people in a similar life stage.
Jan Gehl, Jane Jacobs, Strong Towns, Front Porch Republic. You know, if you're looking for some additional reading.
Governments and wealthy developers have built these buildings and cities that are "unhealthy ".
It would also help if the buildings didn’t look like fucking shoeboxes.
Europe is an environment people want to live in. Copy Madrid, Paris, London, St. Petersburg.
1:37 David Sim says the ideal height of a building is 4 stories and proceeds to list out the reasons why but doesn't get into any reason why any multi story building whether it be 2 to 100 stories is a negative to the human experience. But then again, he is an "urban expert".
Let's go "first principles" on the concept of a city. buildings whether they are 4 stories or 10 stories will block out the natural landscape and sky. Not great. Also having strangers live above, to the side and above you. Also not great. Overall all lack of privacy. Lots of compromise. Let's also consider the friction that is generated between the different modes of transportation within a city (bike, walking, car, tram).
Then again, I have a problem with core fundamental aspects of reality. Primarily the fact that teleportation doesn't exist. This very fact causes so many damn problems.
Any guy who likes a Japanese maple is a winner in my book. Dwarf Japanese maple is a plus.
Funny, people fight like hell to keep their suburbs the way they are. Sounds like they really like them the way they are.
Am I the only one here who's getting a little distracted by the fact that David Sim sounds like a habitual smoker constantly on the edge of crying.
Yes, I understand this concept as we live in a society that embodies much of this philosophy.
But there is a danger if the philosophy is not managed or implemented correct. One example is if the implementation creates a tribal effect, which would create more conflict and less inclusivity.
this had to made up by people who never lived in an apartment with annoyin neighbours
It depends on the people, if you remove the basketballers, then you remove the problem