DDD & Microservices: At Last, Some Boundaries! • Eric Evans • GOTO 2015

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 45

  • @GOTO-
    @GOTO-  Місяць тому

    Looking for books & other references mentioned in this video?
    Check out the video description for all the links!
    Want early access to videos & exclusive perks?
    Join our channel membership today: ua-cam.com/channels/s_tLP3AiwYKwdUHpltJPuA.htmljoin
    Question for you: What’s your biggest takeaway from this video? Let us know in the comments! ⬇

  • @colinrickels201
    @colinrickels201 3 роки тому +5

    I love how eric doesn't have to be this eccentric other worldly person that we can barely make sense of. Hes one of these architects that leaves the jargon behind and speaks to us as normal people. Great speech !

    • @masoud.alinaghian
      @masoud.alinaghian Рік тому

      yeah I guess "F needs to conform to A" is very human language, lets pretend context map is our everyday language!

  • @sohamjoshi9527
    @sohamjoshi9527 3 роки тому +2

    i have been relistening to this talk year after year and every year i am able to find something very useful applicable to the different things i have done over the years. truly a gem of a talk.

  • @AnitShrestha
    @AnitShrestha 5 років тому +4

    I just love listening how Eric explains.

  • @kerimberdimyradov991
    @kerimberdimyradov991 9 років тому +63

    good talk! very usefull.
    but i recomend to switch the speed of video to 1.5 - Eric is very slow speaker as for me (not native english speaker i mean)

    • @ornous
      @ornous 8 років тому +4

      Great talk, indeed!
      +Ali Horezmi Thanks for the advice. 1.5 felt very natural, indeed!

    • @andypandy6063
      @andypandy6063 8 років тому +2

      Irony is so underestimated. :D

    • @MrAconfee
      @MrAconfee 8 років тому

      I started watching this at 1.5, came back to it a few hours later, forgetting I had sped it up, and it took me about 3 minutes to realize that it was being sped up. haha Thanks for the tip.

    • @iphadkegmail
      @iphadkegmail 8 років тому +5

      This was actually the perfect speed for me, gave me time to go back in my mind and draw similarities from my experience to what Eric was referring to. That really enhanced the experience. This is more of a philosophical discussion requiring lot of introspection rather than a "how-to".

    • @lancerkind
      @lancerkind 8 років тому

      Kerim Berdimyradov How do you adjust speed (iPad)? I just see quality.

  • @lionofjudah61967
    @lionofjudah61967 7 років тому +2

    Brilliant mind comes through shining in this very helpful presentation. Thanks Eric!

  • @truekiba
    @truekiba 6 років тому +9

    I highly recommend watching this in 1.5x speed. It sound surprisingly normal and your done quicker.

  • @diogobr07
    @diogobr07 2 роки тому +5

    1:04 Intro.
    1:45 Why do I like Microservices?
    7:57 Services and Messages
    9:22 Bounded Context
    10:36 Context Map Explanation
    17:35 Models need to be clear not big
    22:44 Not all of a large system will be well designed (Say it three times in the mirror every morning! 😄)

    • @diogobr07
      @diogobr07 2 роки тому +1

      25:43 Interchange Context
      29:19 Why not logical boundaries?
      32:56 Wrap up
      36:26 One more time: "Not all of a large system will be well designed"
      37:22 Some time for questions

  • @diogobr07
    @diogobr07 2 роки тому

    1:04 Intro.
    1:45 Why do I like Microservices?
    7:57 Services and Messages
    9:22 Bounded Context
    10:36 Context Map Explanation
    17:35 Models need to be clear not big
    22:44 Not all of a large system will be well designed (Say it three times in the mirror every morning! 😄)
    25:43 Interchange Context
    29:19 Why not logical boundaries?
    32:56 Wrap up
    36:26 One more time: "Not all of a large system will be well designed"
    37:22 Some time for questions

  • @lancerkind
    @lancerkind 8 років тому +4

    I like how Eric outlines the problem of multi-team software development in the first 25 minutes. Chances are you've seen this happen but weren't conscious of the patterns.

  • @gokuljadhav.g8556
    @gokuljadhav.g8556 4 роки тому +1

    Awesome talk. Very helpful !!
    I like the analogy about Car engine and Very big ACL for engine. Great imagination.

  • @marcm3623
    @marcm3623 5 місяців тому

    8:20 how do Services understamd Messages?
    7:57 wpwhats a Service?
    9:20 understamding Messages requires a context

  • @flashflexpro
    @flashflexpro 6 років тому +1

    "Sometimes you know that you need a wall ...", that's absolutely right!!!

  • @javierolazaran7227
    @javierolazaran7227 5 років тому +1

    Great mind in the body of the actor from Sledge Hammer. Good stuff!

  • @burhanotour2049
    @burhanotour2049 5 років тому +3

    Speed up the video to 1.25x ! It will be best

  • @bhimraogornale6024
    @bhimraogornale6024 6 років тому +1

    very enlightening

  • @ndenkha
    @ndenkha 6 років тому +2

    I always thought of this that a service owns its repository (DB), but what if I have a legacy monolithic system with a big DB, and instead of having one service that does everything why can't we have different micro services that deal with the same DB?

    • @imaginarynoise3218
      @imaginarynoise3218 6 років тому +1

      It depends on the database system. Conflicts with the data updating, how it is used, having "multiple sources of truth" determining what is correct data; this can get complicated. It is technically do-able, but it is usually beneficial to wrap the raw data functionality in some logic to control and verify and prevent whatever problems might otherwise crop up.

    • @georgesmith3022
      @georgesmith3022 5 років тому

      Because if you have a single monolithic db performance will suck, bcoz it will be a bottleneck. The bottleneck is usually io operations

    • @mohamedfouad2304
      @mohamedfouad2304 5 років тому

      keep the old system, and keep building new microservices with their own datastores, slowly making the old absolute

  • @significantfrank
    @significantfrank 7 років тому

    Aside from AC which D used to conform A, to accommodate A's change. it could also be a chance to evolve our Domain Model when change comes.

  • @tonydark123
    @tonydark123 3 місяці тому

    Does anyone understand the difference between the generic language of the Interchange Context and the Published Language? Are the in essence the same?

  • @felixdPL
    @felixdPL 7 років тому +11

    x1.25 works best ;)

  • @paulfrischknecht3999
    @paulfrischknecht3999 4 роки тому

    All of digital electronics has an anti corruption layer at each logic gate, each transistor: they interpret and clean up a noisy continuous signal to a 0 or 1. Cannot interpret data more simply than in two ways.

  • @kylemacarthur9863
    @kylemacarthur9863 4 роки тому +1

    2x. I was looking for 3x

  • @smonkey001
    @smonkey001 8 років тому +1

    AC = write validations !

  • @Ramkumar-uj9fo
    @Ramkumar-uj9fo 3 місяці тому

    Microservices were named after the electro-mechanical industry.

  • @sweetphilly2
    @sweetphilly2 Рік тому

    Dang I'm listening on 1.25x and not noticing a difference lol I kinda appreciate that though

  • @MDrivenOfficial
    @MDrivenOfficial 6 років тому

    Hey Evans - what is your reaction to this ua-cam.com/video/TX2lF5doZP0/v-deo.html - if we apply your DDD strategies with model execution will that not be very much faster than what you suggest?

  • @리준-m3u
    @리준-m3u 8 років тому

    안녕하세여

  • @andypandy6063
    @andypandy6063 8 років тому

    Always be in the domain of what you develop. Don't develop a washingmaschine while being in the domain of lawnmowers. Pretty Obvious right?

  • @owaisabbasi955
    @owaisabbasi955 6 років тому

    why why why.???????

  • @adammarek8822
    @adammarek8822 6 років тому +1

    This talk is a waste of time. Sadly, Eric, is a very mediocre speaker. The whole talk can summerized in 3 sentenses.