КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @jamiebrotherston2241
    @jamiebrotherston2241 7 місяців тому +201

    Luttig must feel so ashamed as he watches the Judicial branch collapse. He more than anyone knows the whole thing is collapsing. History repeats - circa Germany 1930's.

    • @i.ehrenfest349
      @i.ehrenfest349 7 місяців тому +15

      Yes, and I almost can’t bear to watch it happening.

    • @daydays12
      @daydays12 7 місяців тому

      Exactly so but I thought Luttig agrees with 'Supreme' Court

    • @afh3318
      @afh3318 7 місяців тому +1

      Freisler s Heirs must be so proud. Never thought I'd get this angry.

    • @jimosborne2
      @jimosborne2 7 місяців тому

      @@daydays12most if not all judges are institutionalists- sadly they are the last people to see the corruption and bias in their own system. They are loathe to call it the way it is to outside astute observers. Witness the judges careful admonition that we can interpret anything beyond that 4 justices thought the issue was worthy of review. That’s bull and he knows that the delay coupled with a very delayed briefing schedule plus the fact there’s at least 4 justices placed on the court by the Federalist Society is an unequivocally clear signal that SCOTUS is putting its proverbial thumbs on the scale of justice.

    • @srccde
      @srccde 7 місяців тому +4

      @@afh3318 Perhaps, if we're lucky, they're goint to meet a similar end.

  • @snowrose101
    @snowrose101 7 місяців тому +191

    The Court didn't have to take the case. They could have said the lower court was correct.

    • @philipd8868
      @philipd8868 7 місяців тому +9

      Agreed

    • @dr.g3860
      @dr.g3860 7 місяців тому +12

      But that would mean the former president couldn't delay his trial until after the election.

    • @71suns
      @71suns 7 місяців тому +13

      Because the lower court was correct

    • @jadeh2699
      @jadeh2699 7 місяців тому

      @@dr.g3860 Exactly. SCOTUS is cheering trump on because they are not done taking away the rights of Americans.

    • @gmh471
      @gmh471 7 місяців тому +2

      No different than what they did in the 2000 election. For a conservative court that always bloviated about state's rights, that somehow slipped their minds when they decided Bush v. Gore. Never should have taken that case. And if they hadn't, Gore likely would have won the election and the US would be a very different place. Assuming Gore's re-election, no Roberts or Alito for sure. The big question is whether we would have elected Obama in 2008 or McCain (or perhaps W). I think probably the Republican, but who knows since we don't know if 9-11 still would've happened (but certainly, no wars in Iraq or Afghanistan). But I think on balance there would probably be a 6-3 majority the other way.

  • @ohreally8929
    @ohreally8929 7 місяців тому +425

    America would be much better off today if more people like Luttig, who actually care about our Democracy and upholding the Constitution had been chosen for the Supreme Court instead of people like Thomas, who are only interested in using the position to line their own pockets.

    • @ginagarrison5339
      @ginagarrison5339 7 місяців тому +19

      True

    • @CraftyGrandmaDem
      @CraftyGrandmaDem 7 місяців тому +14

      Thomas ad Trump have a lot in common.

    • @kayfitzgerald309
      @kayfitzgerald309 7 місяців тому

      Yes!! I heard Clarence said, after being seated on the SC, ( and AFTER Anita Hill) " they aint never getting rid of me"
      He is a man with ALOT of hate, for white people, for being born black, and abandoned, for " The Man", and i wouldn't doubt married ginni, just to show "the man" ! He obviously hates AMERICA & DEMOCRACY!!!
      IMPEACH THOMAS!!
      VOTE BLUE ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸

    • @leoplaate1165
      @leoplaate1165 7 місяців тому +6

      This means the end of respect for SCOTUS..... period...!!!!

    • @loisberry-rose5175
      @loisberry-rose5175 7 місяців тому +3

      Exactly!

  • @fisherforrest
    @fisherforrest 7 місяців тому +67

    Corruption at the highest kevels is what we are witnessing

    • @melvinrael4509
      @melvinrael4509 7 місяців тому

      Yea u right Biden and his son and family and all his administration need to be held accountable accountable for Treason!!!!!

    • @MS-ns2pj
      @MS-ns2pj 7 місяців тому

      Yes, but the odds are very good that you will continue to vote for the Democrats, in spite of their anti-USA stance.

    • @tomr6223
      @tomr6223 7 місяців тому

      Supreme Court corruption squared worse than Dead Scott

    • @pjones1403
      @pjones1403 7 місяців тому

      Yep, even the SCOTUS has shown signs of corruption!

  • @rosemariedeangelis9336
    @rosemariedeangelis9336 7 місяців тому +187

    I don’t understand why the people in congress, as well as Ginni is not charged with insurrection years ago even. Charges should have been filed already. Remove those people from congress.

    • @kinkypinkybabaganoush
      @kinkypinkybabaganoush 7 місяців тому +6

      Me neither

    • @frsncisstringer1853
      @frsncisstringer1853 7 місяців тому +7

      Answer Cowardly Garland

    • @j.erickson8571
      @j.erickson8571 7 місяців тому +3

      Everything takes time. They talked about the considerations for charging Gini. A reasonable prosecutor only goes ahead with cases he can win. There were challenges with this one and others; therefore, they decided to exclude it. That doesn't mean they cannot try it later when more critical cases are out of the way.

    • @JackMason-oq8lf
      @JackMason-oq8lf 7 місяців тому +6

      Like a car ashtray full of soldering stench, we are finally relieving ourselves of Old Mitch. That's a beginning.

    • @pamogburn6151
      @pamogburn6151 7 місяців тому +10

      I agree 100%. Ginni should be charged along with so many House Republicans and a handful of Senators.

  • @lovingmylifeasIage6741
    @lovingmylifeasIage6741 7 місяців тому +578

    Americans can not let anyone take our democracy away from us. I swore to uphold and protect the constitution and democracy.

    • @joebruno8785
      @joebruno8785 7 місяців тому +21

      Ditto!

    • @BLACKWOLF-1911
      @BLACKWOLF-1911 7 місяців тому

      Absolutely, protecting our democracy is on the ballot this year. I refuse to let anyone turn the United States into a communist country.

    • @LydellAaron
      @LydellAaron 7 місяців тому +23

      Me too, 🇺🇲 go vote ⚖️

    • @jimaustin6864
      @jimaustin6864 7 місяців тому +11

      Me to

    • @mr.e432
      @mr.e432 7 місяців тому +17

      Democrats: save democracy!
      Also Democrats: the 14th doesn't require a conviction. Let's remove our political opposition from ballots! Let's also only allow biden to be voted for in our primary!

  • @giennefarcais6834
    @giennefarcais6834 7 місяців тому +577

    unless Clarence "buy me a vacation" Thomas recuses himself, the entire procedure is corrupt

    • @quantx6572
      @quantx6572 7 місяців тому

      I agree, but I also think the Supreme Court is already corrupted like our other institutions and branches of goverment. I would bet that more than half this country does not have trust in the Supreme Court anymore. I know I don't.
      Our governent is slowly crumbling apart and nothing can stop it. The corruption and rot are deep. To remove it means major change, not something the United States is ready for. We are eating ourselves from the inside out. It doesn't get any worse than that. Sorry for being so pessimistic, but I'm calling it like I see it.

    • @alswedgin9274
      @alswedgin9274 7 місяців тому +26

      It already is.

    • @lurklingX
      @lurklingX 7 місяців тому +11

      ha. gonna use that name.

    • @starling5188
      @starling5188 7 місяців тому +14

      Unfortunately, he probably won't.

    • @abcxyz1797
      @abcxyz1797 7 місяців тому +40

      Mrs. Thomas, participated in the insurrection!

  • @cinderspaced4257
    @cinderspaced4257 7 місяців тому +46

    I cannot believe what I am seeing/hearing. In America?

    • @d.s.8733
      @d.s.8733 7 місяців тому

      STOP Listening to MSNBC and you will see some truth!

    • @AdelineSmith-g5c
      @AdelineSmith-g5c 29 днів тому

      Me either 😢

    • @AdelineSmith-g5c
      @AdelineSmith-g5c 29 днів тому

      Just what the dictatorship want to be able to say that no country can survive a Democratic Republic😢

  • @sparky7915
    @sparky7915 7 місяців тому +124

    It is ridiculous that SCOTUS even agreed to ponder Trump's claims of immunity. It is even more absurd that it is going to take so long to come to a definitive conclusion.
    Trump is a genius at messing things up and delaying things. Now he has the Supreme Court baffled with his BS.

    • @safaricartvideos
      @safaricartvideos 7 місяців тому +23

      Not "baffled" "bought"

    • @nakedreef
      @nakedreef 7 місяців тому +20

      They aren't baffled though. They are helping him to Delay!!!!!!!!! IMPEACH THEM!

    • @lurklingX
      @lurklingX 7 місяців тому +25

      they aren't baffled. they know exactly what they're doing.

    • @nancytorres5867
      @nancytorres5867 7 місяців тому

      Wonder what would happen if they found in favor of Trump and Biden used these “new powers” to remove judges from the SCOTUS? Call some members of Congress traitors and replace with someone of his choosing. Lock up Trump for treason and declare himself winner of the 2024 presidential election because he has no opponent.

    • @clickrick
      @clickrick 7 місяців тому +6

      As others have already said, they're not baffled.
      "Complicit" is the word I would use.

  • @bradbarnes9241
    @bradbarnes9241 7 місяців тому +388

    Any time I have the Honorable Judge Luttig come up in my feed it is an immediate click. A scholar among scholars and always very informative with anything he has to say. Sir thank you for your pupblic service to our democracy.

    • @alexshatner3907
      @alexshatner3907 7 місяців тому

      Yea the honorable Judge Lutiig will impeded Trump from becoming president in November

    • @B_Bodziak
      @B_Bodziak 7 місяців тому +24

      According to Luttig, he and Bill Barr have been best friends for over 20 years and go to each other's homes for a meal at least once each month. I sure wish Luttig had convinced Barr to do the right thing in 2019 with the Mueller report.

    • @raptango_na6199
      @raptango_na6199 7 місяців тому +1

      @@B_Bodziakwhich is what

    • @lukutsouthwell1696
      @lukutsouthwell1696 7 місяців тому +18

      Can’t AGREE with you more in this. In a democracy NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW. Period!

    • @peterkenny7810
      @peterkenny7810 7 місяців тому

      I have no doubt of the mans credentials but he called it wrong when he predicted that the supreme court would not go against a bullet proof appeal court decision......

  • @kendrikalexander9916
    @kendrikalexander9916 7 місяців тому +39

    No one is above the law they say, then why are they agreeing to hear this case if thats true?

    • @writerartist5822
      @writerartist5822 7 місяців тому +2

      You must impeach first. Separation of powers.

    • @MS-ns2pj
      @MS-ns2pj 7 місяців тому

      They’re agreeing to hear the case because they believe in freedom, equality, and opportunity.

    • @Mary-gp9qk
      @Mary-gp9qk 7 місяців тому

      tRUMP MUST GO.

    • @Mary-gp9qk
      @Mary-gp9qk 7 місяців тому

      Indict & impeach.
      Get trump out.
      tRUMP FOR PRISON 2024

    • @Beeheezey-2.0
      @Beeheezey-2.0 7 місяців тому

      Like I have said before Donald Trump immunity and we'll go after Biden will go after Obama in any other deep State president we have to

  • @kenairockband
    @kenairockband 7 місяців тому +428

    The gall that they go after Fanni Willis yet Thomas won’t recuse himself.

    • @karonmcgregor4753
      @karonmcgregor4753 7 місяців тому +39

      Exactly - one rule for them, their cronies and their donors , and another for everyone else.

    • @lurklingX
      @lurklingX 7 місяців тому

      right?????? like, they aren't even sure what she did or didn't do. clarence thomas has a LIST of not okay behaviors, bribes, and bullsh*t. clearly a conflict.

    • @kathleenaustin327
      @kathleenaustin327 7 місяців тому +36

      Especially his wife being part of January 6!!! What a disgrace!!!

    • @gotem370
      @gotem370 7 місяців тому

      Trump was smarter enough to get those insane idiots to incriminate themselves along with him, now they are all in bed together

    • @bgo6623
      @bgo6623 7 місяців тому

      @@kathleenaustin327I came here to say the same - Thomas and his wife are both so blatantly arrogant about it too. Him with his smug frown and her with her gleeful grin - they both are traitors to the constitution and to the American people. Despicable

  • @andercoyote4170
    @andercoyote4170 7 місяців тому +134

    Thank you Judge Luttig for your service.🙏🏽
    If only you were the leader of the Court. 🇺🇸

    • @Kawal-s2s
      @Kawal-s2s 7 місяців тому

      That’s exactly why the likes of him can never be trusted with leadership!

    • @alexshatner3907
      @alexshatner3907 7 місяців тому

      Of course you would not be saying that if Judge Luttig was bias towards Trump how ironic and double standard mentality anderwolf

    • @trevoncarter4861
      @trevoncarter4861 7 місяців тому

      Judge Luttig is a political hack. It was great seeing his ashamed face when it became clear SCOTUS was not down with Colorado as he had spewed on air non-stop Hahahaha !

  • @imirim
    @imirim 7 місяців тому +348

    It took 3 days for SCOTUS to take up and hear Bush V. Gore. 16 days for US v Nixon. Two months here is preposterous

    • @CM-vl4wi
      @CM-vl4wi 7 місяців тому +35

      It's the GOP GAME

    • @judyhyland682
      @judyhyland682 7 місяців тому +19

      This is ridiculous

    • @Logan4661
      @Logan4661 7 місяців тому +10

      Imagine you're sitting on death row for a crime you didn't commit, and your case is one of the very few that SCOTUS has agreed to hear. Now imagine that your lawyer walks in and says, sorry, they had to bump your hearing until two weeks after your execution date because a bunch of people that weren't at all concerned about Merrick Garland's delays are suddenly worried about the court's schedule.
      If the case was filed a year earlier, we wouldn't be in this position now.
      Alfred P. Murrah federal building explosion April 19, 1995, Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols indicted on August 10, 1995.

    • @Jerry-up8bk
      @Jerry-up8bk 7 місяців тому

      Clarence Thomas and the S.C members trump appointed SHOULD RECUSE themselves from the case! There DELAYING IT for trump! OBVIOUSLY, ITS A SLAM DUNK ! ANYBODY with 2 brain cells KNOWS IT ! .

    • @daydays12
      @daydays12 7 місяців тому +16

      Trump wants delay The court says Yes Sir Here all the delay you want and we will stay your trial as well Anything we can do for you boss? By the way can you imagine how different ( better) things would be if Gore had been president?

  • @Princelargo
    @Princelargo 7 місяців тому +6

    May justice and truth prevail and may righteousness be upheld

  • @c016smith52
    @c016smith52 7 місяців тому +275

    Always impressed with Judge Luttig.

    • @philster6383
      @philster6383 7 місяців тому +8

      AGREE but had to leave the video because what he is saying is depressing and probably right

    • @emsleywyatt3400
      @emsleywyatt3400 7 місяців тому +7

      Dude knows his.............stuff.

    • @fd9987
      @fd9987 7 місяців тому

      Nothing he said is right. SCOTUS took this case to slow-walk it so Smith can not begin his trial until after the presidential election. He’s gaslighting us. Don’t fall for it.

  • @leoplaate1165
    @leoplaate1165 7 місяців тому +171

    This means the end of respect for SCOTUS..... period...!!!!

    • @davidbaker1918
      @davidbaker1918 7 місяців тому +13

      There was a time when out of the three branches of government, you could always count on the Court being non-partisan, beholden to the law, and that went for Liberal AND Conservative judges.

    • @pamogburn6151
      @pamogburn6151 7 місяців тому +3

      Yes. However, I have read Project 25 and noticed that a few of the Conservative Justices stated that they may leave the court if they don't receive a pay raise within the year, which is a strong indicator that if Trump wins the presidency there will no longer be a Judicial Branch as we know it.

    • @TheTrfrench
      @TheTrfrench 7 місяців тому

      It seems the s.c. are willing to bully the American people into doing what they want everyone to do.

    • @MrRjsnowden
      @MrRjsnowden 7 місяців тому

      You mean the end of respect for SCOTUS because they don't do what you want. Get outta your bubble.

    • @roger8792
      @roger8792 7 місяців тому +4

      This is a yes or no question. It should not take 8 weeks to decide

  • @davidgiles9651
    @davidgiles9651 7 місяців тому +270

    19 WEEKS of delays SO FAR. Add 11 more MINIMUM, and you've got your 2 TIERED JUSTICE SYSTEM staring you in the face.

    • @ganeshiyer9672
      @ganeshiyer9672 7 місяців тому +19

      All these delays do nothing but help Trump. Also, no one seems to be talking about Clarence Thomas should recuse himself since his wife was heavily involved in planning Trump’s J6 coup.

    • @Mary-gp9qk
      @Mary-gp9qk 7 місяців тому

      👀 F CK!

    • @neonmarblerust
      @neonmarblerust 7 місяців тому +9

      Could have been decided by January

    • @nannie2846
      @nannie2846 7 місяців тому +5

      @@ganeshiyer9672 You know that won't happen. Ginni won't let him recuse because Clarence has to be there to protect her boy! Do you think they do three-somes? lol. JK!

    • @Chinesebandits008
      @Chinesebandits008 7 місяців тому

      So, when will they be charging Trump or anyone else for that "coup"? Lol@@ganeshiyer9672

  • @rayray7561
    @rayray7561 7 місяців тому +27

    Four justices thought the appeal case is important enough for SCOTUS to hear the case? Or, simply four justices did not like the appeals court decision.

    • @keefersmotherland1308
      @keefersmotherland1308 7 місяців тому

      Colorado judges are nothing more than brainwashed MSNBC/CNN viewers. And if they were to follow the law, not their partisan narrative, they wouldnt have come to the decision they did. The supreme court just proved to everyone that the justices on the Colorado supreme court arent following the law.

    • @varab6287
      @varab6287 7 місяців тому +3

      I think this has more to do with the federal society and the heritage foundation and their plan to undo the new deal completely.

    • @debbielasalle5472
      @debbielasalle5472 7 місяців тому +1

      Trump 2024

    • @tomr6223
      @tomr6223 7 місяців тому

      plus they kicked the can down the road beyond the election......America is legally like some kind of broken state.....think legally like the bombed out buildings in Ukraine

  • @BrunoG03-Vichy
    @BrunoG03-Vichy 7 місяців тому +549

    It is unbelievable that the court just timed this thing perfectly for trump. No other way to look at it.

    • @kurtwicklund8901
      @kurtwicklund8901 7 місяців тому +24

      Too believable sadly.

    • @Frenchblue8
      @Frenchblue8 7 місяців тому +10

      Like a few other of our friends and legal analysts, I don't think you were wrong but as long as George Conway and a few others are willing to give the benefit of the doubt... At least until we see otherwise affirmatively and unequivocally.... Yeah that's what happened

    • @Mary-gp9qk
      @Mary-gp9qk 7 місяців тому +5

      Precisely. Experts at it.
      "🎶Oh, Canada, with your face
      sketched on it twice..." Joni Mitchell

    • @mikepietrusko5775
      @mikepietrusko5775 7 місяців тому

      Unbelievable they are delaying Trump's trial to hear this nonsense

    • @milycome
      @milycome 7 місяців тому

      Oh, Please. Nothing in politics happens by accident. Everything in politics happens Only by design.
      Don't believe me. Just ask the "puppet masters." Oh, sorry. The puppet masters need to keep the quiet part quiet (hidden).

  • @cpk313
    @cpk313 7 місяців тому +111

    We Can Not Let A Corrupt Court Decide This Matter

    • @andercoyote4170
      @andercoyote4170 7 місяців тому

      They already F’d us in 2000 with Gore v Bush and this court is far more debased.

    • @JOMz778
      @JOMz778 7 місяців тому

      Well it will. That's their job. They agreed to take up the appeal. The justices dont care what you think

    • @goettling
      @goettling 7 місяців тому +1

      Solution?

    • @llahsramavt4097
      @llahsramavt4097 7 місяців тому

      Ha Ha.

    • @nyccowboy7563
      @nyccowboy7563 7 місяців тому

      the court decision has absolutely nothing to do with the election!! Why is anyone at all worried about the people having a choice to vote for their preferred candidate?

  • @romeror7027
    @romeror7027 7 місяців тому +640

    This court should be held accountable for this delay.

    • @sassygirl9497
      @sassygirl9497 7 місяців тому

      Start investigating the justices. This is getting ridiculous. Some probably should have recused themselves especially Clarence Thomas. His wife was involved in Jan 6th. Start removing them by impeaching them.

    • @Logan4661
      @Logan4661 7 місяців тому +51

      I agree, but Merrick Garland should be held accountable for his delay too.

    • @Mary-gp9qk
      @Mary-gp9qk 7 місяців тому +24

      Clarence & Jen-Jen
      better run for cover.
      SHAME
      ON
      YOU!

    • @boondoggle4820
      @boondoggle4820 7 місяців тому +36

      Unfortunately, there’s no way to hold justices accountable for anything they do once they’re on the bench. Something needs to be done to change that. They should at least have tough ethics standards that they’re held accountable to.

    • @GML_123.
      @GML_123. 7 місяців тому +5

      For what? Seriously! Who cares when the trails are, they are in process. The panic is Off the charts. We have a way of addressing Donald Trump at the ballot box, we all know who he is.. give it a rest, y’all look unhinged.

  • @Claude-s2e
    @Claude-s2e 7 місяців тому +71

    Our federal judicial system is broken and deserves a review from an independent committee. Bottom to top.

    • @d.s.8733
      @d.s.8733 7 місяців тому

      MSNBC, CNN, and All the Elite Media corporations Need to be Reviewed from Bottom to Top! You are constantly being lied to and drink the Cool Aid

    • @rotorheadv8
      @rotorheadv8 7 місяців тому

      Well, the Democrats are certainly working on destroying our system and making one more to your liking. Except I seriously doubt you will like it if it ever comes to pass

    • @georgecarberry9222
      @georgecarberry9222 7 місяців тому +5

      The justices on the SC should be investigated thoroughly before some of them are removed & replaced with justices that aren't corrupted as they are now.

    • @Proton-KB
      @Proton-KB 7 місяців тому +5

      it’s rigged not broken…Americans…

    • @MS-ns2pj
      @MS-ns2pj 7 місяців тому +2

      @@georgecarberry9222 6 of the justices on the SCOTUS will vote according to the U.S. Constitution. The other 3 will obey the Democratic Party.

  • @garyburke7602
    @garyburke7602 7 місяців тому +69

    This is all about delaying justice.

  • @vertigo20001
    @vertigo20001 7 місяців тому +513

    Why can there not be a hearing, just like with Fani Wilis, regarding the conflict of interest in Clarence Thomas and wife Ginni to disqualify Justice Thomas from the case? Let's see some equal justice here.

    • @lindaschaeffer9183
      @lindaschaeffer9183 7 місяців тому +22

      Yes

    • @ChuckWortman
      @ChuckWortman 7 місяців тому

      Because Dems are Boy Scouts while Repubs are Bullies!

    • @MrRjsnowden
      @MrRjsnowden 7 місяців тому +14

      Because there is no conflict from a spouse, and also because just because MSNBC says something does not make it true.

    • @B_Bodziak
      @B_Bodziak 7 місяців тому +5

      That's the Senate's job.

    • @B_Bodziak
      @B_Bodziak 7 місяців тому +21

      ​@@MrRjsnowden If judge McAfee were married to one of the defendants, there would be

  • @EternalEyeofRa
    @EternalEyeofRa 7 місяців тому +231

    Let's stop waiting for these institutions to save us. Come November we need to save ourselves from these institutions.

    • @velmaphillips2701
      @velmaphillips2701 7 місяців тому +11

      EXACTLY

    • @ginagarrison5339
      @ginagarrison5339 7 місяців тому +10

      VOTE BLUE to save American democracy 💙

    • @johnpossible6292
      @johnpossible6292 7 місяців тому +4

      I hope so also but what really worries me are the amount of people who think trump should be President again.

    • @CraftyGrandmaDem
      @CraftyGrandmaDem 7 місяців тому +3

      YES! Vote blue and save our freedom.

    • @nguzoloveinlofi3832
      @nguzoloveinlofi3832 7 місяців тому +1

      Voting is an institution. Furthermore, the legislative branch controls who votes and whether your vote will count or not.

  • @vincentnguyen7385
    @vincentnguyen7385 7 місяців тому +17

    SCOTUS gives Judge Luttig a BIG lost on section 3 in 14th amendment.

    • @MS-ns2pj
      @MS-ns2pj 7 місяців тому +1

      Since there was never an insurrection on January 6th, the 14th Amendment, Section 3 does not apply.

    • @MossyMozart
      @MossyMozart 7 місяців тому

      @vincentnguyen7385 - Not just Judge Luttig, but all the American people lost as well.

    • @tomr6223
      @tomr6223 7 місяців тому +1

      The court is incompetent so what do any on its rulings mean"

  • @rjlchristie
    @rjlchristie 7 місяців тому +308

    It is grossly reprehensible that firstly Garland and then the Courts have and are continuing to put the nation through such interminable delay. It's disgusting.

    • @user-gl5ux5xk3k
      @user-gl5ux5xk3k 7 місяців тому +12

      Garland should have been fired

    • @postergmail6202
      @postergmail6202 7 місяців тому

      Garland was terrified. SCOTUS is generally biased. If we do happen to have another Biden administration we should get a new Attorney General. SCOTUS will take some time to fix, of course.

    • @ginihood7696
      @ginihood7696 7 місяців тому +8

      Reminder: Merrick Garland has ZERO to do with the court's scheduling....
      Also.. You would prefer that Presidents be allowed criminal behaviors?

    • @HOPE.TheresNoPlaceLikeHomeClub
      @HOPE.TheresNoPlaceLikeHomeClub 7 місяців тому +9

      Re what's scarier still is the SCJ could be throwing our nation to the wolves.

    • @ginihood7696
      @ginihood7696 7 місяців тому +4

      ​@@user-gl5ux5xk3k Fired for what exactly? You object to him wanting to "make the inadequate laws immutable?... he is the first in a very long time to care enough to do the job of shoring up the loopholes that wormy political opportunists can slip through to their own ill gotten gains against We the People".... ?

  • @susanw2869
    @susanw2869 7 місяців тому +154

    Time to take the Senate. House, and Presidency and FIX all this BS, including SCOTUS!

    • @liberalshaveitallbackwards4667
      @liberalshaveitallbackwards4667 7 місяців тому

      Yes! Democrats have ruined so much

    • @twilightzone-ex-hostage1997
      @twilightzone-ex-hostage1997 7 місяців тому +18

      Dems need a healthy majority, so VOTE BLUE

    • @dorabolick9275
      @dorabolick9275 7 місяців тому +4

      @@twilightzone-ex-hostage1997 Highest inflation in 40 years, open border! Yeah everything is great! HELLO!

    • @chadstephens3640
      @chadstephens3640 7 місяців тому

      Biden has been in government 40 years but somehow Trump ruined everything in the last year of his presidency huh 😂

    • @queenslander954
      @queenslander954 7 місяців тому

      @@dorabolick9275. Ooooh .. have a little cry mate ,
      open your eyes , inflation is high all around the world …
      But sure go back to Trumps $8 trillion deficit when he slithered out of office ,
      sure go back to a leader who slags off dead soldiers & steals money from his own cancer charity.
      Wake up Eugene

  • @donellaraye6830
    @donellaraye6830 7 місяців тому +16

    It’s always great to hear judge Luttig speak about the legal issues impacting citizen DJT! It will get interesting to see how the SCOTUS deal with this important case!

    • @MS-ns2pj
      @MS-ns2pj 7 місяців тому

      The odds are very good that 6 of the justices will rule according to the U.S. Constitution and the other 3 will obey the Democratic Party.

    • @tomr6223
      @tomr6223 7 місяців тому +1

      Delay delay delay.....no other coherent thoughts...just like Trump

  • @superkunk2
    @superkunk2 7 місяців тому +364

    There’s nothing to decide. No one is above the law. Period

    • @Sanzen
      @Sanzen 7 місяців тому

      the fact that a large portion of Americans on the right genuinely think a spoiled rich kid like DJT should be above the law is absolutely wild. i guess if he says the right things, nothing else matters. scary stuff.

    • @whiskyjames4200
      @whiskyjames4200 7 місяців тому +14

      Yes! As a layman, this is plain and simple!
      "NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW IN AMERICA."
      SCOTUS IS WRONG. 🇺🇲💯

    • @henryc1000
      @henryc1000 7 місяців тому

      Even Joe biden having classified documents in his possession when he shouldn’t have?

    • @MrRjsnowden
      @MrRjsnowden 7 місяців тому +7

      There is a process to prosecute a president while in office. Its called impeachment and then conviction in the senate. All of this gaslighting about this putting the president above the law is just crazy. The constitution is pretty clear here. Also, everyone in the comments is presuming guilt. That's not very American as well.

    • @ChuckWortman
      @ChuckWortman 7 місяців тому

      Agreed! It feel like an ego thing like I am a Supreme Court Justice and I must be the decider! Or they're doing it to help Trump. All roads lead to the latter because they had a chance to accept this case and refused!The fact that this is tgexonly time a president tried to interfere with the elections shows you hiw uncommon it is so no reason not to let the lower court ruling stand. They had their chance and passed on it

  • @myleschilton3473
    @myleschilton3473 7 місяців тому +73

    The question as to whether or not the Supreme Court is a political body has been answered.

    • @daydays12
      @daydays12 7 місяців тому +3

      Yes indeed

    • @MrRjsnowden
      @MrRjsnowden 7 місяців тому

      You mean weather or not they do what you want??

    • @sarahblade676
      @sarahblade676 7 місяців тому

      Pretty much. Grease Money Talks

  • @melissaverduin3693
    @melissaverduin3693 7 місяців тому +224

    Thank you Ali & Judge Luttig! True patriots.🇺🇸

    • @alexshatner3907
      @alexshatner3907 7 місяців тому +4

      Yea the honorable Judge Lutiig will impede Trump from becoming president in November

    • @eddriver7815
      @eddriver7815 7 місяців тому

      hes a drumpfer you fool

    • @bryanhill1406
      @bryanhill1406 7 місяців тому +2

      💯%

    • @emma1166
      @emma1166 7 місяців тому

      The best!

  • @yvonneschimmel453
    @yvonneschimmel453 7 місяців тому +17

    This is ridiculous!!!!! He has to be held accountable, period!!!!

    • @MS-ns2pj
      @MS-ns2pj 7 місяців тому

      What do you believe that Trump has to be held accountable for?

  • @paulfikslin7595
    @paulfikslin7595 7 місяців тому +258

    SCOTUS Never should have taken this case!!!

    • @josephcampanelli6427
      @josephcampanelli6427 7 місяців тому

      If you can’t question an election then you will have what Putin enjoys in Russia. The fact that it can be questioned is pure democracy. Btw- Clinton denied the election results in 2016 remember? The next thing you know they will try to imprison their political opponent like they did in Ukraine, Russia, Congo, Egypt, Uganda, Iran, Venezuela and Panama. Actions like this should worry you.

    • @daydays12
      @daydays12 7 місяців тому +18

      Of course not. I agree

    • @sammenter1
      @sammenter1 7 місяців тому +9

      Agreed

    • @kig57
      @kig57 7 місяців тому +3

      @oh_my-ge3eu Appeals are done until AFTER a verdict! Not before even going to trial!

    • @danieltheal
      @danieltheal 7 місяців тому

      The Court is corrupt

  • @nakedreef
    @nakedreef 7 місяців тому +192

    Thank you judge. Please keep talking to the American people. Thanks Ali for this report.

  • @moonstoneway2694
    @moonstoneway2694 7 місяців тому +198

    Thank you Judge Luttig! I wish you were on the Supreme Court.

    • @bumpsy2358
      @bumpsy2358 7 місяців тому

      Why, he is one of them.

    • @marianlincoln9008
      @marianlincoln9008 7 місяців тому

      Where did you get that idea...​@@bumpsy2358

    • @oldrrocr
      @oldrrocr 7 місяців тому +5

      trump will get his time in court, no matter what they try.

    • @carolinematusevich889
      @carolinematusevich889 7 місяців тому +3

      His name has come up several times, yet never selected. I think we know why. Over the last 25 years, every president selected a Justice based on their personal interests. Sadly, even Obama.
      Luttig will always stay firm with traditional Republican beliefs, which once involved interpreting cases based solely on Constitutional laws, and former Judicial decisions, and not influenced by political party agenda, nor injection of personal beliefs.
      And Obama had his chance to nominate him as CJ.

    • @carolinematusevich889
      @carolinematusevich889 7 місяців тому +3

      @bumpsy2358 No. He's actually not. He's never been compromised. There's people who are just like that. IMO, justices who are being considered for the Court should be required to take the Briggs-Myers personality test. Out of 16 personality types, only 3-4 would be capable of not injecting their political and personal beliefs in their courtroom decision making. All the others are too prone for becoming compromised.

  • @jEdwinJames9675
    @jEdwinJames9675 7 місяців тому +45

    Our country has been already hijacked by a wannabe dictator. We have a bunch of Judges who are cowards and are bending to this mentally messed up man. I mean come on what's there to make a decision of. You can't just take people's vote. The impending danger is tump gets in this time he's never leaving. The dude loves himself so much, and the power that he can have feeds his personal ego.

    • @birbluv9595
      @birbluv9595 7 місяців тому

      We should all send tRump daily “Care” packages of the most fatty, sugary, unhealthy foods that he prefers. And hope nature takes its course.

    • @josephgriffin2388
      @josephgriffin2388 7 місяців тому

      Edwin...the court clearly sees, as do Biden's supporters THAT Y'ALL VOTED A MAN WITH DEMENTIA INTO THE PRESIDENCY!!!
      ....you're NOT to be trusted!!

    • @Summalogicae
      @Summalogicae 7 місяців тому

      Why does SCOTUS do what it does?
      Fascists do what fascists do-support one another for the sake of power and control.
      Stop pretending there is legitimacy to their decisions.

  • @petehurley2889
    @petehurley2889 7 місяців тому +38

    NO COO-COOS, NO COUPS!!!! WE NEED A REAL LEADER~~~ NOT A CHEATER!

  • @loisberry-rose5175
    @loisberry-rose5175 7 місяців тому +59

    I thought no one was above the law!🙄🤬

    • @daydays12
      @daydays12 7 місяців тому

      Not if you are Trump say the Supreme Court of the might USA if you are rich white, loved by the fascist christian nationalists and have millions of violent armed supporters. In that case , in the US say these justices , we will help you to do whatever you like.

    • @alexshatner3907
      @alexshatner3907 7 місяців тому

      You thought is right , Trump is above the law live with it

  • @BLACKWOLF-1911
    @BLACKWOLF-1911 7 місяців тому +297

    Justice delayed is Justice denied.

    • @MrBreeze66
      @MrBreeze66 7 місяців тому +3

      Speedy trial is for the defendant not the government. Why would we want the government to be able railroad someone with a speedy trial?

    • @chriscoughlin9289
      @chriscoughlin9289 7 місяців тому

      @@MrBreeze66 Really? I don't recall Trump - or any of his most vocal defenders to date have ANY reservations about that with the fate of the Central Park Five hanging in the balance more than 3 decades ago.
      Not even NOW - with more than 20 years worth of hindsight to help them disavow their glee at the heinous injustice of it.
      In fact, DJT took out some, er, um, passionate media buys to goose public sentiment along in favor of the very kind of 'railroading' that apparently has got your panties so twisted here today - if I recall.
      But, hey - HALLELUJAH!!!
      Yer HEEEEEALED - NOW AND FOREVER MORE!!!
      Right?

    • @marydurham5976
      @marydurham5976 7 місяців тому +3

      @@MrBreeze66… Please read my comment above!!🙏☝️

    • @tomr6223
      @tomr6223 7 місяців тому +3

      There is no justce with these hand picket and paid off justices

    • @vronquille7078
      @vronquille7078 7 місяців тому +1

      That is what happened to j6 protestors no civil rights whild held prisoner either

  • @everettcalhoun8197
    @everettcalhoun8197 7 місяців тому +165

    Delaying the trial until after the election would be a political stunt. The idea that this immunity case would take months is ridiculous it should take no more than a few weeks to decide. And that is giving time for Thomas to go on vacation.

    • @nyccowboy7563
      @nyccowboy7563 7 місяців тому

      @ever...you obviously have no clue as to how complicated the preparation for this trial is.

    • @davidjenkins1347
      @davidjenkins1347 7 місяців тому +14

      @@nyccowboy7563 It's already been through the preparatory process on the DC court.

    • @catbb1000
      @catbb1000 7 місяців тому

      How long does and how hard is it to tell Stinky he doesn't have absolute immunity. A bunch of 1st year law students could probably figure that out. It's just another delay.​@@nyccowboy7563

    • @JustForFun-mt9og
      @JustForFun-mt9og 7 місяців тому +5

      The case is so ridiculous, it should be decided in no more than a few minutes. No one can be absolutely immune from prosecution.

    • @KC73
      @KC73 7 місяців тому +5

      @@nyccowboy7563they didn’t need to even take this dumb case.

  • @willmitchell6521
    @willmitchell6521 7 місяців тому +8

    I usually know when corporate media comes on when I hear the gas lighting

  • @leef8063
    @leef8063 7 місяців тому +73

    Hey, I am an old white guy. I am set for the rest of my life, maybe 10 years left. So, you young people should start thinking about what your life will look like in 40 years. I am a democrat and proud of helping people like me build the American dream. God Bless America.

    • @lesleyphillips8146
      @lesleyphillips8146 7 місяців тому +7

      Thank You 💙💙

    • @catpaladin1
      @catpaladin1 7 місяців тому +4

      And your kids kids. Your neighborhoods, schools, institutions. Vote like your life depends on it. Because it does.

    • @robertmarmaduke186
      @robertmarmaduke186 7 місяців тому

      Focus on 4 years. America is dead busted hillbilly broke. Biden has dragged America into a proxy war MegaSlush dark ops. They can't account for $100Bs looted at this point. His minions are poised to crush natural gas and oil out of production, *rendering food, utilities, and commute into UnObtainium.* You will eat black fly maggots, and praise Klimate Jeebus.

    • @bunnycox1046
      @bunnycox1046 7 місяців тому +2

      GOD BLESS YOU AND YOUR PATRIOTISM SIR

  • @andrewstevenson118
    @andrewstevenson118 7 місяців тому +190

    SCOTUS have the best judges that money can buy.

    • @MightyJustice
      @MightyJustice 7 місяців тому +9

      *worst

    • @Ricky-g6i
      @Ricky-g6i 7 місяців тому

      Don’t be jealous

    • @mccauley2023
      @mccauley2023 7 місяців тому

      @@Ricky-g6i grow up dude

    • @mile_high_topher
      @mile_high_topher 7 місяців тому +10

      @@Ricky-g6i Yeah, I wish I had enough money to pay the government to break the law...

    • @andrewstevenson118
      @andrewstevenson118 7 місяців тому +3

      @@Ricky-g6i Do you mean envious? No.

  • @patrickmurphy7485
    @patrickmurphy7485 7 місяців тому +160

    It’s a criminal act that this judge was not put on the scotus before it became the church bench

  • @leovr13
    @leovr13 7 місяців тому +7

    With Great power, comes Great Responsibility" "Action speaks louder than Words" ❤

  • @lydiaaguayo3178
    @lydiaaguayo3178 7 місяців тому +621

    Keep Russia and dictatorship out of America! Vote Blue 2024!!!💙💙💙

    • @sandyd3686
      @sandyd3686 7 місяців тому +52

      Blue NOVEMBER 💙 🥰💙💪💙👍💙🎉

    • @Fatdog-Dakind
      @Fatdog-Dakind 7 місяців тому

      Grump gave those Top Secret Doc.s to the Saudi Prince for the $3 billion in cold cash that Jarad and Evangut brought back to him!

    • @patrickmurphy7485
      @patrickmurphy7485 7 місяців тому +1

      A super majority in both the senate and House by going VERO in November and forevermore
      Never vote for red Russia republicans

    • @RobertSilva-n5w
      @RobertSilva-n5w 7 місяців тому +9

      Never Blue !!!

    • @j_117
      @j_117 7 місяців тому +18

      @@sandyd3686 🌊🌊🌊🌊

  • @janetlinden837
    @janetlinden837 7 місяців тому +173

    We need to insist, put pressure on SCOTUS. It is that IMPORTANT to take this case asap. Bush vs Gore took 3 DAYS!!!!!!!!

    • @Andrew_Sherman
      @Andrew_Sherman 7 місяців тому +44

      That case was beneficial for republicans to decide early and a specific way.
      This case is beneficial for republican judges to drag their feet and decide differently.

    • @tammyclark4618
      @tammyclark4618 7 місяців тому +30

      @Andrew_Sherman and that's the most sickening part!

    • @josephtortona824
      @josephtortona824 7 місяців тому

      no pressure will sway the SCOTUS because they are UNTOUCHABLE just like what TRUMP thinks he is and the SCOTUS is EXTENDING that UNTOUCHABILITY to Trump! Outrageous it may seem but that is what the action of the SCOTUS decision is pointing and insinuating to! About time to limit the terms of the SCOTUS via Constitutional Amendment and be deemed CO-TERMINUS with the Office of the POTUS who appoints them by the way!

    • @playedout148
      @playedout148 7 місяців тому +12

      Minority rule.

    • @rickemail3950
      @rickemail3950 7 місяців тому

      Stop the Supreme Court from delaying the trial so it won't be completed until after the election. They are all about delaying this ruling. Consider that the Supreme Court will not rule for absolute immunity while Biden is still President. They won't rule for absolute immunity if President Biden is re-elected. They won't rule for absolute immunity if defendant trump wins the election, because dictators already have absolute immunity.
      So the corrupt CONSERVATIVE justices on the $upreme Court will not ever rule for absolute immunity. This delay tactic is their only play. We need to find leverage to force them to rule immediately.

  • @yettaloyd507
    @yettaloyd507 7 місяців тому +89

    God bless Judge Luttig🙏

  • @Miastrong930
    @Miastrong930 7 місяців тому +3

    Judge Luttig is a genius. His grasp of the complexities of Co stitutional Law is materful.

    • @writerartist5822
      @writerartist5822 7 місяців тому

      Colorado-wrong. 9-0 wrong. Only thing won, was defending Bush's war crimes.

  • @tomasrosa5358
    @tomasrosa5358 7 місяців тому +318

    God bless you Judge Luttig.

    • @lynnspins1
      @lynnspins1 7 місяців тому +14

      Kinda need to remember he, up until trump attempted a couple, was onboard with all the other stuff these justices did for his republican party. The only thing good I can say about this man is, at least, he has a line when it comes to an all out dictatorship.

    • @Freeyourmind-y4g
      @Freeyourmind-y4g 7 місяців тому

      I’m guessing you had never heard of him and his views before Trump tried to reverse the ‘20 election results. Look him up.

    • @daydays12
      @daydays12 7 місяців тому

      God is busy blessing Mikey "purity balls" "Moses" Johnson who hears voices in his head

    • @daydays12
      @daydays12 7 місяців тому

      I agree This Luttig fellow is complicit with these corrupt political justices@@lynnspins1

    • @daydays12
      @daydays12 7 місяців тому

      Indeed @@reidpinchback8850

  • @j_117
    @j_117 7 місяців тому +381

    Take the senate, EXPAND THE COURT!

    • @JF-iq1yx
      @JF-iq1yx 7 місяців тому +25

      Take the Senate and impeach the court.

    • @robfalter2522
      @robfalter2522 7 місяців тому +1

      thats exactly what trump is going to do next year😎

    • @jakeoo7tupperware
      @jakeoo7tupperware 7 місяців тому +1

      Do you know a way we can win 60+ Senate seats? Let alone keep the narrow majority we already have.

    • @Ricky-g6i
      @Ricky-g6i 7 місяців тому

      Stop crying already.

    • @seanj3667
      @seanj3667 7 місяців тому

      The Dems have the Senate. They need the House. And they need to hold the White House.

  • @dwightmcfee9521
    @dwightmcfee9521 7 місяців тому +110

    There is no constitutional bar to having a trial during the election. Lock Him Up.

    • @TimT2-uw8td
      @TimT2-uw8td 7 місяців тому

      You Democrats are like Putin. So sick.

    • @outdoorqrandma
      @outdoorqrandma 7 місяців тому

      See if someone doesn't come up with a memo saying that he can't be prosecuted during the election.
      Remember Individual #1 in the Comey Case? Barr had this memo stating a sitting president couldn't be prosecuted while in office. That president is not in office now! Charges have already been investigated and proven to be true and yet that has been forgotten somehow.

    • @suehowie152
      @suehowie152 7 місяців тому

      Will the SC allow that?

  • @d.gjochimsen9725
    @d.gjochimsen9725 7 місяців тому +6

    I always appreciate Judge Luttig. He knows what he’s talking about.

  • @mikehill3764
    @mikehill3764 7 місяців тому +461

    Can’t believe I am witnessing a circus like this in my lifetime.

    • @jenniferzoch3309
      @jenniferzoch3309 7 місяців тому

      I know, the democrats are all clowns.

    • @shaney8275
      @shaney8275 7 місяців тому +17

      Believe it. We should keep in mind the question as to who is responsible for it,

    • @toomanydonuts
      @toomanydonuts 7 місяців тому +9

      evil is never very smart

    • @bsmith5304
      @bsmith5304 7 місяців тому +4

      Most of us can believe this is happening

    • @dwainmcwilliams2043
      @dwainmcwilliams2043 7 місяців тому +13

      It will get progressively worse. Uncle Clarence and Ginni will guarantee it does.

  • @muggstugs
    @muggstugs 7 місяців тому +169

    We need Luttig on THE SUPREME COURT!!!

    • @jonmartin88
      @jonmartin88 7 місяців тому +4

      On the constitutional issues related to Trump, he is very good. Otherwise, he is very conservative. Not sure a Democrat would ever nominate him and a MAGA Republican would never appoint him

    • @janetmcclellen733
      @janetmcclellen733 7 місяців тому

      I don't know he's very far right

    • @gmh471
      @gmh471 7 місяців тому +2

      No, Judge Luttig is principled and has integrity, but he also has some draconian beliefs and is just as conservative as the sitting conservative justices. He used to always appear on short lists and I am sure he is not happy that there are people he thinks were less qualified than he who were selected by presidents Bush and Trump.

    • @lisariggs5688
      @lisariggs5688 7 місяців тому +1

      Mugg…sadly Trump will prob get 2 more nominations… maybe even another liberal replacement

    • @Mary-gp9qk
      @Mary-gp9qk 7 місяців тому

      A.en!

  • @kennethquintini658
    @kennethquintini658 7 місяців тому +403

    No one is above the law in America, vote Biden/Harris for American democracy and freedom in November 🇺🇲☮️

    • @TimT2-uw8td
      @TimT2-uw8td 7 місяців тому

      Democrats are above the law

    • @alisonquinto2630
      @alisonquinto2630 7 місяців тому

      That is just it , It is not about our constitution and our freedoms and rights. The democracy is about a global world order that will control everything including you and your freedoms and destroy America and our constitution which gives us our rights. these people are out to destroy you and take everything from you!

    • @shawngraham1481
      @shawngraham1481 7 місяців тому +5

      Gross

    • @andrewordog4397
      @andrewordog4397 7 місяців тому

      If no one is above the law, that means Biden and Harris should be in prison.

    • @flipflopski2951
      @flipflopski2951 7 місяців тому +3

      trump is above the law or he'd have been locked up a long time ago...

  • @susiemalphurs5212
    @susiemalphurs5212 7 місяців тому +4

    Judge Luttig is the smartest Construction scholar I've ever heard. Rep Raskin is also extremely versed in the Constitution.❤

  • @Stitcher_in_MD
    @Stitcher_in_MD 7 місяців тому +92

    The Supreme Court nominations process should be changed. As it stands, the justices are nominated on a partisan basis by whoever is in office, with the understanding that bias would not exist in rulings. That has obviously not worked for many years. It is starkly evident in the past several rulings made by the present justices. It is no wonder why people do not have confidence in the highest court in our country. Previous justices were possibly less easily swayed. Considering those retired from judicial service have weighed in heavily in opposition to Trump, it seems that some of the present justices are lacking in knowledge of Constitutional law. There should be better way to avoid bias.

    • @ginihood7696
      @ginihood7696 7 місяців тому +7

      Agree... But tricky to overcome when money talks....so very loudly $$$$$...

    • @sylviagoodman6008
      @sylviagoodman6008 7 місяців тому +2

      Likely other issues at play here!

    • @Summalogicae
      @Summalogicae 7 місяців тому

      Let’s not forget that Biden has refused to do anything about SCOTUS

    • @RevDrMalamaRobinson
      @RevDrMalamaRobinson 7 місяців тому

      They have never ruled in his favor yet. It's no secret that the justices should be extremely cautious about there personal safety...

    • @joestone776
      @joestone776 7 місяців тому

      It is a clear conflict of interest!

  • @Andrew_Sherman
    @Andrew_Sherman 7 місяців тому +343

    Who here has “0” confidence that they will get it right….

    • @sylviagoodman6008
      @sylviagoodman6008 7 місяців тому +25

      Their delay is the issue!

    • @terrancestodolka4829
      @terrancestodolka4829 7 місяців тому +13

      You are giving them a high rating...

    • @happyprogressivepoop1422
      @happyprogressivepoop1422 7 місяців тому +9

      "Get it right" you mean how you want it.

    • @icin4d
      @icin4d 7 місяців тому +34

      @@happyprogressivepoop1422 So you believe a president should be aloud to commit crimes with no reverence to criminal accountability?

    • @Summalogicae
      @Summalogicae 7 місяців тому +27

      @@happyprogressivepoop1422So you’re implying that getting it right could include the decision that a president can be above all laws and not held accountable for any crimes?
      Real genius, this one.

  • @heik8275
    @heik8275 7 місяців тому +240

    Thank you Judge Lutig , this is making me sick I can’t believe this . I’ve lived my life believing in the American way truth justice & honor this is nuts

    • @naycoll9784
      @naycoll9784 7 місяців тому +11

      You've been living a lie.

    • @sipthewater
      @sipthewater 7 місяців тому

      Yes. I pray that the truth reveals that Poo-a-ton and tchrump are masterminds of deception and work from the same playbook. Running scared from his crimes, the con don is ruining our good America.

    • @amarketing8749
      @amarketing8749 7 місяців тому

      Republican Fanatics have Destroyed the Supreme Court.
      Supreme Court = ZERO CREDIBILITY!!

    • @bierstick
      @bierstick 7 місяців тому +17

      We feel your pain around the world. We hope to see common sense and rationality return to U.S. politics. Any stable world order depends on it.

    • @kizzmiaz
      @kizzmiaz 7 місяців тому

      A wake up call if ever one was needed. Law enforcement in the US has been corrupt for decades. Justice does not matter as much as being rich and famous, not even as much as being friendly with local DA, Police Chief and Mayor.
      If Trump has achieved anything it's to bring this corruption into crystal clear focus, for the whole world to see.

  • @CharlieFlask
    @CharlieFlask 7 місяців тому +11

    I have never seen so much effort to Protect the Guilty.

    • @keefersmotherland1308
      @keefersmotherland1308 7 місяців тому

      Guilty of what? The Capitol videos prove that it wasnt even close to a "insurrection" like the democrat liars were claiming it was. How does t he QAnon shaman walk through a dozen doors without ever touching a door, and somehow this insurrection is "worse than 9/11 and pearl harbor" according to Kamala Harris. Everything we have been told about Trump is always distorted, to where it isnt the truth anymore, but a highly edited version to push a narrative. Thats FACT ! But Trump isnt guilty.

    • @ClassicFIHD
      @ClassicFIHD 7 місяців тому +1

      Hunter and Hillary totally agree.

    • @CharlieFlask
      @CharlieFlask 7 місяців тому

      @@ClassicFIHD yep, ..hunter, Hillary and ever other Democrat just witnessed the Republican crime wave in action..

    • @orangecheetoisababy6277
      @orangecheetoisababy6277 7 місяців тому

      And Trump will get rid of the Supreme Court too.
      When he tries to become KING.

  • @terrencekane8203
    @terrencekane8203 7 місяців тому +110

    RNC Headquarters should fly the flag of the Russian Federation. 🇷🇺

    • @LivingtheDream67
      @LivingtheDream67 7 місяців тому

      And the DNC should fly the China flag at their headquarters.

    • @daydays12
      @daydays12 7 місяців тому

      Truly They already do

    • @vincentgraham9451
      @vincentgraham9451 7 місяців тому +1

      The Biden administration is already flying that flag and the Chinese government flag.

  • @leeschillinger4020
    @leeschillinger4020 7 місяців тому +377

    Interview with retired judge Luttig was extremely informative as he always is. Clear, concise, and even handed. He puts everything in perspective and is not alarmist. Thank you for having him on.

    • @brementmark
      @brementmark 7 місяців тому +5

      Why bother?

    • @goodtroublemaker143
      @goodtroublemaker143 7 місяців тому +10

      @@brementmarkwhy are you here?

    • @mrmacq-jk4td
      @mrmacq-jk4td 7 місяців тому

      so that maybe you buggers would learn something?@@brementmark

    • @Rafael57YT
      @Rafael57YT 7 місяців тому +6

      ​@@brementmarkbecause this is history in the making.

    • @kimbybean001
      @kimbybean001 7 місяців тому

      @@brementmark I agree. Nobody with any power to do anything is listening to him. Trump should have been wiped from the ballot already. He is clearly an insurrectionist.

  • @YYY-GUY
    @YYY-GUY 7 місяців тому +50

    The case boils down to where to draw the line in the sand on defining boundaries of Presidential duties.
    That is IRRELEVANT because Chump's actions are so absurdly beyond that line, no matter where it gets drawn.

    • @terrancestodolka4829
      @terrancestodolka4829 7 місяців тому +4

      Even that wiseguy knows better than the stooges on the somewhat high Court.

    • @icin4d
      @icin4d 7 місяців тому

      Exactly. Dump wasn't acting as a president. He was acting as a candidate. His officials told him there was no fraud - US AG, WH counsel, etc. Only his personal lawyers told him he could do this illegal scheme.

  • @jimaustin6864
    @jimaustin6864 7 місяців тому +776

    The Supreme Court has lost all credibility

    • @mile_high_topher
      @mile_high_topher 7 місяців тому

      A completely illegitimate court.

    • @mile_high_topher
      @mile_high_topher 7 місяців тому +4

      @@robfalter2522 The smartest MAGA, ladies and gents.

    • @larryscarr3897
      @larryscarr3897 7 місяців тому

      ​@@dixonmopar2129could you lend a guy like 600 million, I'm a bit short.

    • @danhood1443
      @danhood1443 7 місяців тому +2

      @@robfalter2522MSDNC seems angry? LOL

    • @AugieRockero
      @AugieRockero 7 місяців тому +10

      @@dixonmopar2129 but yet losing in Ukraine, comrade colonel 😂😂😂

  • @Jeremy-vb6tv
    @Jeremy-vb6tv 7 місяців тому +228

    This case is absurd! and now so is the SCOTUS.

    • @nigelcairns6203
      @nigelcairns6203 7 місяців тому +5

      I think everyone is unhappy and so will do ANYTHING for money, from janitors to judges, and from crooks to christians.

    • @ln8116
      @ln8116 7 місяців тому

      I can’t believe that the SC is so corrupt. But money can buy anything in America.

    • @TDS_ExistMaga4ever
      @TDS_ExistMaga4ever 7 місяців тому

      This whole 7 or 8 years of attacks on Trump is what is truly ridiculous and disgusting and so unwarranted

    • @georgewilson4245
      @georgewilson4245 7 місяців тому +14

      @@nigelcairns6203 And we can start with the BOUGHT Clarence Thomas and his wife by the 1% Republican Donor Class.

    • @kerritrouble3473
      @kerritrouble3473 7 місяців тому +14

      Vote blue in every election, even school boards and get your friends and family and neighbors to all do the same. Join the Democratic National Committee and find out how they need you to help get the word out to as many voters as possible! Help people to register to vote, offer rides to the polls. There’s so many ways we can all help to save America and our Democracy from this tyrant and his corrupt cult members that maybe able to listen to the truth, have conversations with anyone and everyone. Most importantly vote Blue 🇺🇸💙🙏🏻

  • @davidgoldberg1219
    @davidgoldberg1219 7 місяців тому +25

    This is precisely why 4! Supreme Court Justices should be recusing themselves. Thomas and the 3 appointments by Trump. Isn't this obvious???

    • @jadeh2699
      @jadeh2699 7 місяців тому

      Yes, it's obvious but they don't care about the law, justice, or the American people. Corrupt SCOTUS.

    • @MrRjsnowden
      @MrRjsnowden 7 місяців тому

      So should the 2 justices from the lower court recuse themselves. They are both Biden appointees. Oh wait no, they did what you wanted so there all good.

  • @darksoul479
    @darksoul479 7 місяців тому +5

    If the people in the private sector worked as slow as the Supreme Court does we would all get fired.

  • @sebbya8328
    @sebbya8328 7 місяців тому +72

    Should not have even taken it up in what world would that ever be acceptable and the fact that four of them even gave it that much credibility is despicable

    • @MrRjsnowden
      @MrRjsnowden 7 місяців тому

      Have you read the constitution lately?? Its all layed out there.

    • @playedout148
      @playedout148 7 місяців тому +8

      Only reason is to benefit trumpism. Clear as crystal.

    • @Summalogicae
      @Summalogicae 7 місяців тому

      You seem to think that an extreme right-wing dominated SCOTUS is taking this up in good faith, as if they think it’s a really interesting issue.
      Fascist do what fascists do; namely, seek power and control. This is a mere means for furthering that goal.
      And you are thinking about process and institutional integrity-a true liberal.

    • @MrRjsnowden
      @MrRjsnowden 7 місяців тому

      @playedout148 What is Trumpism?

  • @SharonKitchen-eu7bb
    @SharonKitchen-eu7bb 7 місяців тому +84

    We will soon learn if the supreme court wants a democracy or a dictator.

    • @daydays12
      @daydays12 7 місяців тому

      The answer is clear - at least 5 of them are corrupt and or facist Christian Nationalists.

    • @LydiaStarz
      @LydiaStarz 7 місяців тому

      I think we now know. For whatever reason, our Democracy is over. We are already under dictatorship. And I feel sick to my stomach. Never saw it coming til it was already too late. The vote won't matter in November because Trump Cult will force their way in the same as they tried in 2020. They won't fail next time. The law is on the side of trump.

    • @danieltheal
      @danieltheal 7 місяців тому +8

      I think we already know that

    • @MrMome1612
      @MrMome1612 7 місяців тому +8

      Well, the first thing a dictator gets rid of is the supreme court, so that would be rather silly!

    • @RickMcGuire-bl2vs
      @RickMcGuire-bl2vs 7 місяців тому

      Orrrrr a Constitutional republic...

  • @patriciainderkum6675
    @patriciainderkum6675 7 місяців тому +1

    This judge should be on the Supreme Court!

  • @michaelratcliffe7559
    @michaelratcliffe7559 7 місяців тому +68

    SCOTUS is very close to the line, if not over it, between being good men who do nothing and bad men who have taken action by placing their thumb on the scale.

    • @TomTeriffic
      @TomTeriffic 7 місяців тому

      They are corrupt. This is what happens when the most unethical, partisan and corrupt congress and president in US history appoint political hacks to the highest court. We should be electing the brightest, most experienced, morally and ethically sound politicians. Politicians who will nominate and appoint the most ethical, intelligent, qualified and experienced legal minds in the country.

    • @prarieborn6458
      @prarieborn6458 7 місяців тому

      ver occur to anyone watching and. worried, that the SCOTUSJustices do not have immunity from the wrath and revenge of trump? is it out of the realm of possibilty that their lives and their families’ lives are on the line ?

    • @playedout148
      @playedout148 7 місяців тому +11

      Overturning Roe was it. Turning a right into a crime for women.

    • @josephgriffin2388
      @josephgriffin2388 7 місяців тому +1

      ...and the women on the court?
      ...free pass....because they ALWAYS SIDE WITH YOU!!
      And if they don't, they should be removed.
      ...it's called bias for a reason.

    • @sylviagoodman6008
      @sylviagoodman6008 7 місяців тому +3

      Excuse me! What are you talking about?

  • @brownasianity
    @brownasianity 7 місяців тому +20

    Nobody is above the law.
    Until someone offers All Expense paid Vacation 😅

  • @CarolynJacksonBrown
    @CarolynJacksonBrown 7 місяців тому +27

    Good afternoon Judge Luttig, and thank you for calling out SCOTUS

    • @alexshatner3907
      @alexshatner3907 7 місяців тому

      Yea the honorable Judge Lutiig will impede Trump from becoming president in November

  • @niahoward1920
    @niahoward1920 7 місяців тому +6

    Any time, and every time, is a good time, to dispense Justice.

  • @riceexperiment
    @riceexperiment 7 місяців тому +322

    How can citizens further show their disgust with injustice thomas? Thank you Judge Luttig for a clear explanation.

    • @DwynRoberts
      @DwynRoberts 7 місяців тому +20

      Protest!!!!! Write letters. Vote. Donate.

    • @John-x9x2q
      @John-x9x2q 7 місяців тому +3

      How to get some therapy

    • @TrillReese
      @TrillReese 7 місяців тому +4

      Thomas has never broke or have been shaken by the powers who never wanted him there in first place.

    • @starletsatori8933
      @starletsatori8933 7 місяців тому +2

      Justice Thomas is honorable. No SCOTUS should ever be swayed by "feelings" or public opinion.

    • @naimcgrath1401
      @naimcgrath1401 7 місяців тому +2

      Don't bother, he ain't going nowhere,

  • @janus1363
    @janus1363 7 місяців тому +27

    But Trump is charged with acts that are OUTSIDE official Acts!!! So how does this enquiry answer that?

    • @terrodar19
      @terrodar19 7 місяців тому

      Anyone can charge you with anything, the prosecution power in this country is a joke.

    • @Darbobski
      @Darbobski 7 місяців тому +4

      @@terrodar19 Tell us more about how little you know about what a Grand Jury is.

    • @carolynwilken7421
      @carolynwilken7421 7 місяців тому

      Something called due process will be in order...two sides to every story...innocent until proven Guilty... he can take it to the top...Trump 2024!!

    • @christophpaessler8444
      @christophpaessler8444 7 місяців тому

      that s part of the question bc ur cruel wannabe tyrant t* and his helpers think that all was part of his official work and therefore immunity.
      In the doc case t* goes even further declaring immunity even for things done later, bc he took the docs with him while being prez

    • @Darbobski
      @Darbobski 7 місяців тому

      @@carolynwilken7421 That would be great if we could get to that point without Trump constantly manipulating delays. The innocent welcome their day in court, that should tell ya something about your "innocent until proven guilty" stance. I also don't pay much attention to MAGA supporters when they say stuff like that thanks to their constant "Hunter" nonsense.

  • @user-vs7pk2er4u
    @user-vs7pk2er4u 7 місяців тому +365

    Judge Michael Luttig should be on SCOTUS!

    • @eddriver7815
      @eddriver7815 7 місяців тому +6

      theres enough criminals already on it

    • @1247.cccccc
      @1247.cccccc 7 місяців тому +4

      So ask Sotomayor to retire.

    • @fifermcgee5971
      @fifermcgee5971 7 місяців тому +16

      Agree, he is a national treasure.

    • @EdwardBarnes-z4w
      @EdwardBarnes-z4w 7 місяців тому +2

      No way !

    • @Sunny-il1xm
      @Sunny-il1xm 7 місяців тому +26

      "Donald Trump is a clear and present danger" Judge Michael Luttig..

  • @-Gramps
    @-Gramps 7 місяців тому +6

    Nice interview, Ali! Clear, concise questions- which elicited clear, concise answers from this superbly qualified constitutional expert! No political spin, just the facts- my thanks to both of you.

    • @keefersmotherland1308
      @keefersmotherland1308 7 місяців тому

      all those so called facts ... and yet the supreme court proved they know nothing. 9-0 and you think MSNBC/CNN are telling you the truth???

    • @shalomkibby4702
      @shalomkibby4702 7 місяців тому

      Judge Luttig has always been a reliable voice. Dependably nonpartisan. It is unfortunate that you don't see that. His answer was very concise.

    • @writerartist5822
      @writerartist5822 7 місяців тому

      @@shalomkibby4702 Bought and paid for. Did you love him when he said Bush could not be prosecuted for an illegal war?

  • @Kerry-nc5ci
    @Kerry-nc5ci 7 місяців тому +151

    Let's not be stupidly naive. If the Supreme Court did not intend to overrule the Appeals court decision, it would have simply refused to hear the case.

    • @marymccluer1630
      @marymccluer1630 7 місяців тому +12

      Not necessarily. They might think the question of presidential immunity is too important for an Appellate Court to decide, and they want to put their stamp as the final word on the matter.

    • @Auguur
      @Auguur 7 місяців тому

      Biden needs to declare himself emperor and throw all MAGA morons in jail. Because he can do whatever he wants, according to those fools.

    • @Lostinathens
      @Lostinathens 7 місяців тому

      That's being naive. I like you optimism but still, naive. ​@@marymccluer1630

    • @Durufle68
      @Durufle68 7 місяців тому +2

      that's not totally true.

    • @ejnichols05
      @ejnichols05 7 місяців тому +11

      Exactly!! And for them to take up the case of whether or not a president has immunity is just plain dumb when it's already written in the constitution that they are NOT above the law. I'm planning my exit strategy NOW bc you never know with these "for sale" judges.

  • @johntillotson4254
    @johntillotson4254 7 місяців тому +20

    Thank you Judge Luttig

  • @toradog5719
    @toradog5719 7 місяців тому +29

    So we need the SC to tell us water is wet.

    • @alexshatner3907
      @alexshatner3907 7 місяців тому

      I tell you Briden is sitting on dry waters

  • @ceciliaw8576
    @ceciliaw8576 7 місяців тому +4

    Thank you gentlemen for all the information very interesting.

  • @annsmith7207
    @annsmith7207 7 місяців тому +40

    Full respect. Once again, Judge Luttig brings clear, concise and reasoned thought and everyone can understand. I am a huge fan and have been since the J6 Committee hearings. I first heard Judge Luttig testify and stopped everything I was doing, sat down and was transfixed that he told the absolute unvarnished truth…and was a Republican to boot ! A true American patriot.

  • @donnacox1354
    @donnacox1354 7 місяців тому +26

    I think the thought is too make it clear for all time that any former President, any sitting President does not have immunity for all time. If they do not decide it now, there will be the same delay tactic by trump in the FL documents case.

    • @marymccluer1630
      @marymccluer1630 7 місяців тому

      I'm wondering if Judge Cannon won't postpone setting a trial date until after SCOTUS has ruled on Trump's total immunity claim. We probably won't get a decision until the end of June. Really, the Supreme Court's delay in hearing Trump's immunity claim will likely mean neither of the federal trials happen until next year, if at all. It is DOJ policy not to try a presidential candidate close to an election. It's too bad for voters, because having verdicts in these cases might help voters decide.

    • @MarkLRandall
      @MarkLRandall 7 місяців тому

      Sure, but why does it take 6 months, particularly since the answer is quite obvious?

  • @DarkRoomAmbience
    @DarkRoomAmbience 7 місяців тому +67

    The charges against Trump don't "involve official acts" of his Presidency but from actions outside those responsibilities. Attempts to manipulate election outcomes and unlawfully maintain power are not "official acts" of the Presidency. Why did SCOTUS frame the question in an ultra specific, yet irrelevant way that doesnt even have anything to do with Trump's situation, either ruling by SCOTUS will not resolve the issue. If they affirm the President is immune "from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office", thats great, now what about acts outside of the President's responsibilities? Such as attempts to influence the outcome of an election and illegally retain power? When do we get a ruling on that question?

    • @josephgriffin2388
      @josephgriffin2388 7 місяців тому

      AFTER we get a ruling on WHY the Obama Administration put a CIA mole into Trump's 2016 campaign...AND NOT BEFORE!!
      ....there's your ACTUAL treason.

    • @MrRjsnowden
      @MrRjsnowden 7 місяців тому

      The dribble you just posted is an accusation and just to clear things up for you investigating fraud in an election is a function of the executive.

    • @jenniferzoch3309
      @jenniferzoch3309 7 місяців тому +1

      cope more leftist

    • @keefersmotherland1308
      @keefersmotherland1308 7 місяців тому

      Who do you think is responsible for questioning election fraud/interference? The President and everyone below him. He represents EVERY American, so if there are questions that need to be asked, then his position as president and leader is an official act. The fact is, many on the left are ignoring simple facts to dispute the immunity claim. But thats not surprising considering all the left judges lately seem to have common sense missing from their rulings.
      - E.Jean Carroll lied during her testimony, deleted evidence, and somehow the judge thinks she deserves millions ... for lying??? Thats not how the law works, you dont reward a liar with millions.
      - Judge Engoron valued Mar-a-lago at 18 million, which is between 1 and 2% of the value that another judge in the same court building said Mar-a-lago is worth $1.5 billion. Now this case is centered on the fraud, that Trump over valued his assets. You show me one person in the entire world that undervalues their own property, under market value. There isnt one. Thats how you know this is politically motivated. The ONLY fraud here is the case against Trump ... clear as day to anyone with a brain.
      - So the same people a few years ago were saying that Trump was in cognitive decline right? So that same year they were saying that Biden was sharp as a tack. And yet Biden is in such a state of cognitive delusion (as per the report released Feb 2024) "elderly man with a poor memory" so they arent going to prosecute??? Clearly Politically biased.
      - In ever case ... clear common sense is ignored by judges that are already biased, with some even stating that "Trump committed insurrection" but they had to change the definition of Insurrection in order for it to fit. Years ago, before January 6th, the online dictionaries had the same wording as the hard copy dictionaries, that include words like especially violent, and other such descriptive words that have been deleted recently so the word insurrection can be used to describe what happened on January 6th. Which proves that this isnt actual justice, but manipulated circumstances to create a false narrative against a political opponent.
      Not really hard to figure out ... unless you are a democrat ... then you think January 6th is worse than pearl harbor and 9/11. What a joke, and an insult to those that died.
      If you still somehow think January 6th is worse than pearl harbor or 9/11 ... you are in the cult. History denial is a mental illness ... just like Trump Derangement Syndrome.

  • @racquelwallace9003
    @racquelwallace9003 7 місяців тому +5

    So Biden should have Seal Team Six ready, right?

  • @danielgriffy2170
    @danielgriffy2170 7 місяців тому +38

    It’s disgusting that the scotus put the case so far away.. this should be decided and done BEFORE the election.. the American people deserve that!!

    • @Stickey14
      @Stickey14 7 місяців тому

      They like trump because he ignores the gifts and trips they get from the federalists!

    • @rochellestarr9538
      @rochellestarr9538 7 місяців тому

      WHY????IT WONT CHANGE MAGA minds and it wont change the fact that we outnumber Maga by a landslide!!!

    • @kingforaday8725
      @kingforaday8725 7 місяців тому

      But they did and aint nuttn you are gonna do about it. MAGA

    • @rotorheadv8
      @rotorheadv8 7 місяців тому

      I doubt you will like their ruling when it comes.

  • @brandonandrewdad
    @brandonandrewdad 7 місяців тому +24

    I'm in agreement. We need many more like Judge Luttig.

    • @Jess-kz2wn
      @Jess-kz2wn 7 місяців тому

      Reasoning with this group on the Supreme Court which was attempted makes it clear that they are just oppositonal as the GOP congress and the GOP governors in this country. It is dispicable. I for one do not want fascism in this country.

    • @alexshatner3907
      @alexshatner3907 7 місяців тому

      Yea me too the honorable Judge Lutiig will impede Trump from becoming president in November

    • @MrRjsnowden
      @MrRjsnowden 7 місяців тому

      Judge Luttig has been wrong so many times I've lost count. You really should look outside your bubble from time to time.

    • @BassBoyVA
      @BassBoyVA 7 місяців тому

      ​@@MrRjsnowdenyou really believe everyone actually cares about your One sided opinions you drop on ea thread.
      The mind of a broken record.

  • @teresajohansen2589
    @teresajohansen2589 7 місяців тому +66

    Thank you that’s why MNSBC is my go to place

    • @Torchriver67
      @Torchriver67 7 місяців тому

      Question is why hasn’t NBC parent company call out this Fascist/MAGA Supreme Court?

    • @rosybean
      @rosybean 7 місяців тому

      MSNBS! 🦬💩😂

    • @Fabio-ew3sh
      @Fabio-ew3sh 7 місяців тому

      I literally LOL'd

    • @alexshatner3907
      @alexshatner3907 7 місяців тому

      MSNBC will not be your savior for Trump's Victory in November, talk to me after super Tuesday three days from now

  • @LordOfLight
    @LordOfLight 7 місяців тому +45

    I'm no lawyer, so perhaps that's why I can't think of one legitimate reason for not throwing this case out, and for not penalising the lawyers who have had the temerity to bring a case that can have no other purpose than to simply delay court proceedings until after the election.
    In more robust times Trump and his crew would have had their heads removed.

    • @kudr66
      @kudr66 7 місяців тому +1

      Ther are several reasons. I.e.:
      - right of defendant to have due process
      - errors in judgement of lower courts
      - letting it be would have devastating impact on the country in the future (on the ability of executive branch to act swiftly and fearlessly)
      - it may result in questioning immunity of top officers in other 2 branches in the future which would have catastrophic impact on the country

    • @LordOfLight
      @LordOfLight 7 місяців тому +5

      @@kudr66 - "Due process" does not include the right to have your case brought before SCOTUS.
      - Any court can make mistakes. Does this mean that every case must go to the Supreme Court? (Hint: no). Is there any good reason to believe they did in this case? (Ditto)
      - "Letting it be", in this case, means not hearing a frivolous suit brought only to delay and, worse, aiding in said delay by putting the hearing date TWO MONTHD in the future. Whatever happened to "justice delayed is justice denied"? The American people need to know if the candidate is a criminal.
      - "It may result in.........." is purest conjecture of the silliest kind. No former President has ever complained that lack of immunity has held him back because it never has. This is why Presidents have WH lawyers. You didn't know this?
      Only a Trumper could propound such drivel. Be ashamed.

    • @kudr66
      @kudr66 7 місяців тому +1

      @@LordOfLight _"Any court can make mistakes."_
      This is why they took it. They review arguments from both sides and then they decide if there is a chance that the lower court made a mistake. This is their duty and you hate them for doing their job.

    • @LordOfLight
      @LordOfLight 7 місяців тому +4

      @@kudr66 That sentence was followed by a question - a crucial question - and one which you declined to answer.
      You're a natural Trumper alright. Never tell the truth, never acknowledge uncongenial reality. It hurts and you're too delicate. Now go away, I'm already tired of you. You can have the last word. You're the kind that must have it.

    • @kudr66
      @kudr66 7 місяців тому

      @@LordOfLight Stop blabbing and as one question per comment. I am not a trumper. Never voted for him. I just happen to have a brain.

  • @billpii6314
    @billpii6314 7 місяців тому +149

    IT'S SO FU$KING OBVIOUS!! NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW!

    • @italianknight78
      @italianknight78 7 місяців тому +10

      Unless the DOJ says you're too incompetent to stand trial for your crimes.

    • @companyheroes8120
      @companyheroes8120 7 місяців тому

      until Biden is not indicted for his stealing classified document when he was a senator...

    • @simplelogic9090
      @simplelogic9090 7 місяців тому +12

      *Cough cough* Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, Eric Holder, Hunter Biden, Bill Clinton.... want me to keep going?

    • @dennisball4699
      @dennisball4699 7 місяців тому

      SCOTUS know that nobody is above the law. They just want to delay the proceedings.

    • @kerritrouble3473
      @kerritrouble3473 7 місяців тому

      @@italianknight78That was the personal opinion of the Republican writing that report. Go read it and you’ll find out the real reasons behind Biden’s not being charged!

  • @berniesbend
    @berniesbend 7 місяців тому +165

    We need to hold him accountable regardless of what a bunch of corrupt partisan hacks say!

    • @Summalogicae
      @Summalogicae 7 місяців тому +2

      Well, I hope you realize that will require violence. Are you suggesting that?

    • @dianagale581
      @dianagale581 7 місяців тому

      @@Summalogicae you must be a republican since violence is your answer.

    • @joestone776
      @joestone776 7 місяців тому +3

      Agree, its time we take care of business if they wont.!

    • @chiphill4856
      @chiphill4856 7 місяців тому +8

      Please grow up

    • @kerritrouble3473
      @kerritrouble3473 7 місяців тому

      Vote blue in every election, even school boards and get your friends and family and neighbors to all do the same. Join the Democratic National Committee and find out how they need you to help get the word out to as many voters as possible! Help people to register to vote, offer rides to the polls. There’s so many ways we can all help to save America and our Democracy from this tyrant and his corrupt cult members that maybe able to listen to the truth, have conversations with anyone and everyone. Most importantly vote Blue 🇺🇸💙🙏🏻 God Bless America and our troops!

  • @uweinhamburg
    @uweinhamburg 7 місяців тому +29

    Many people do not understand that the old term 'may you live in interesting times' isn't a friendly wish but a curse!

  • @mmp-k6u
    @mmp-k6u 7 місяців тому +3

    Thank you both for the update

  • @MrWascalwabbit
    @MrWascalwabbit 7 місяців тому +155

    How is attempting to overthrow the vote of the people an official act? That is ludicrous.

    • @spatulaboy1
      @spatulaboy1 7 місяців тому +10

      Trump’s logic: I believe only I can save America. Therefore, anything goes to re-elect me. I officially declare that the Sec of State should “find” me 11,780 votes, so I can officially keep saving this country from itself.

    • @MechaTrader
      @MechaTrader 7 місяців тому +13

      He never tried to "over throw" the vote.

    • @benugdsen75
      @benugdsen75 7 місяців тому +8

      @@MechaTrader but he tried to order SC to ”find more votes” even though he knew there were none.

    • @jp13119
      @jp13119 7 місяців тому +16

      @@MechaTraderYes he did. FFS

    • @MisterMick113
      @MisterMick113 7 місяців тому

      I dont see anytime where he suggested anything like that. But anyone with common sense knows that brandon getting more votes than JFK is fishy. If you dont think thays suspicious then you clearly dont have a functioning brain

  • @aulii11
    @aulii11 7 місяців тому +110

    The most aggravating aspect of the SC's delay in hearing arguments and rendering a decision is that I firmly believe they could accomplish all of this a lot sooner than they have decided to. It certainly smacks of blatant partisanship.

    • @kellir.747
      @kellir.747 7 місяців тому +5

      On the other hand, their decision needs to be carefully written and that should not be rushed.

    • @aulii11
      @aulii11 7 місяців тому +14

      @@kellir.747 Agreed, but, really, I believe this could all be resolved in a much more timely fashion than it appears it will be.

    • @roscoemuttley
      @roscoemuttley 7 місяців тому +5

      Its Thomas' district.

    • @aulii11
      @aulii11 7 місяців тому +3

      @@roscoemuttley Does that matter in cases like this?

    • @icin4d
      @icin4d 7 місяців тому +22

      @@kellir.747 "their decision needs to be carefully written"
      The appellate court's ruling was quite sufficient.

  • @nanettemurray1000
    @nanettemurray1000 7 місяців тому +45

    Help us Judge Luttig. What can we do about this? America is in a dangerous position. Please help. How is the court getting away with this, and what can we do about this shameful situation? I’m scared to death. Vote 💙🇺🇸💙💙💙

    • @marshcreek4355
      @marshcreek4355 7 місяців тому +3

      You should read legal author and frequent NSNBC guest Eli Mystal's most recent piece on Scotus in the Nation Magazine for an answer to your lamentation. It's one of the best I've ever read on how we got to this point on our Supreme Court and what we need to do about it. As much as I admire Judge Luttig he's a product of and a system insider and would never criticize the SC he was once being considered for. He'll never come foward with a critique of how they are breaking democracy like Eli does in his writings.

    • @foxysil52
      @foxysil52 7 місяців тому

      We SHOULD CONTACT OUR DEMOCRATIC LEADERS, ALL OF THEM AND INSIST THAT PRESIDENT BIDEN INSTALL 5 TO 6 LIBERAL DEMOCRATIC JUDGES, TO MAKE SURE THE CONSERVATIVE RIGHT LEANING JUDGES, DO NOT PARDON AND KEEP TRUMP IN OUR WHITE HOUSE, THATS WHAT THE DEMS SHOULD DO..FAST TRACK THE DEMOCRATIC JUDGES THROUGH CAUSE BIDEN HAS EXECUTIVE AND PRESIDENTIAL POWER TO DO SO..TRUMP DID IT?

    • @tylerchapman9234
      @tylerchapman9234 7 місяців тому +1

      You're one of those people that would say "In order to save democracy we must not allow the leading candidate on the ballot. " With a straight face.

    • @mommamomma3607
      @mommamomma3607 7 місяців тому

      😆