VÄLGATUSED ⟩ Leo Kunnas teeb taas kokkuvõtte olukorrast Ukraina sõjas
Вставка
- Опубліковано 12 тра 2022
- Vestlussaadete sarja "Välgatused" uues episoodis annab riigikogu liige, riigikaitsekomisjoni aseesimees ja reservkolonelleitnant Leo Kunnas ülevaate olukorrast Ukraina sõjas. Saatejuht on Indrek Petersoo.
Portaali Objektiiv videoproduktsioon. Vaata lisaks objektiiv.ee.
Leo Kunnas , Tänan
Hea ülevaade taaskord! Leo Aitäh!
❤ Suur aitäh jagamast ja aitäh Austatud Härra Kunnasele.On hea teada mis tegelikult toimub ja ka Eesti peaks sellest õppima .
Panen kõvasti mööda, vabandust! Ukraine’s on praegu väljaõppes 1,5 mil Joni this meets. Rääkimatta US tankidest ja erirühmadest, instruktoritest ja vabatahtlikest. Tahtsin minna a kui eriväljaõpet pole sis’s riiki ei lasta
Leod on väga hea kuulata ... nagu David Vseviovi või Aleksei Turovskit või omal ajal Raivo Järvit. Lisaks eriala tundmisele, väga rahulik, väga asjalik jutustamine, ei ole rapsimist, ei ole demagoogiat jms ega huupi üle pakutud juttu.
Be ye not deceived nor do not end up misreading the gospel. I received an agreement to use someone's comment that i find useful to use as an example of how people misread the gospel. If one read the bible like that - then one misreads the gospel. This is the comment i was allowed to use: Hello there! I appreciate your input from the perspective you come. There are a few things I'd like to run by you, that may clear up some misunderstandings. First, if I understand you correctly, you are saying that sex and gender are the same thing, and that because God says no one has ever hated their own flesh, the reason for people who claim they are transgender hate the bodies they are in is because they have been deceived by outside forces. If I have understood you properly (and please correct me if I have not), I have these points: By definition, gender and sex are not the same thing. Gender as we currently have it defined in the dictionary is a bit confusing because of how broad it is, but the difference is still major between the words "sex" and "gender". The vast majority of people who actually benefit from transitioning- what most people call transgender- do not actually believe that they are changing their sex, or their gender; they're simply aligning themselves with what they feel is the best outward expression of themselves. They're all born with this particular set of characteristics, of which some are refined or influenced in context of culture or social norms, but not dictated by them. Those who are fooled by society are not experiencing the medical version of transgenderism, so while you may be talking about people who ultimately end up detransitioning because yes, they were fooled, you are not talking about those who were born with the feeling of discrepancy within their body. It's interesting to me though that in Genesis 5:1-2, "When God created mankind, he made them in the likeness of God. He created them male and female..." If you read the literal words and do not take an interpretation, as is often used to manipulate a point someone is trying to make, if God created males and females in his likeness, then God is both male and female, and to be more Godly would mean to be both male and female. The Bible forbids man to exalt himself in this way ("Thou shalt have no other Gods before me"), and makes achieving that status in that way impossible to all but hermaphrodites, to which he then also calls them unworthy of being Priests, Leviticus 21:16-23, "For the generations to come none of your descendants who has a defect may come near to offer the food of his God. No man who has any defect may come near: no man who is blind or lame, disfigured or deformed; no man with a crippled foot or hand, or who is a hunchback or a dwarf, or who has any eye defect, or who has festering or running sores or damaged testicles." This creates a very specific hierarchy which discludes the vast majority of people from being worthy as God's chosen people, lowering many to a status less than desirable, stripping away their percieved power. That doesn't sound very loving or inspiring for improvement, does it? And if you were to say that Leviticus is part of the Old Testament and no longer in the new Christian teachings, and therefore irrelevant, who decided that they were worthy to edit the word of God, exactly? Especially since according to the Bible, none of us are Gods. While the Ephesians quote you gave me says that "no man ever yet hated his own flesh", and instructs us to love ourselves, in the New Testament we have Luke 14:26 which says "If anyone comes to me without hating his father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters, *and even his own life*, he can not be my disciple." It's a precondition to coming to the Lord to hate yourself, seemingly, and to find salvation by accepting Him only. Seems a bit like railroading to me. Why not find comfort in being able simply just to love yourself, without needing to outsource the work to an omnipotent being to do that for you? It seems to me that the danger in giving someone that permission is that perhaps they will use this God-like feeling to do "evil" things, but evil things are often done in the name of God anyway; humans will choose to do what they will, and justify it in the name of whatever they please. Removing self-empowerment is as poor an answer to curbing "evil" as allowing someone of poor conscience to act as they please with no consequence. Those who feel powerless can and often feel motivated to action by resentment and oppression to get justice. That's what victimhood mentality produces, too. Perhaps on the theoretical judgement day, when all is restored as you say, people will stand in front of God as he created them in his likeness: as a being that is both male and female, instead of either or, and we will realize that we are all God.
The soul, who has written that comment, says that baphomet - who is satan - the old devil is the god.
Well, the soul is correct in one thing: for satan is also knowns as god (with little g) and with a kingdom - this fallen earth is satan`s kingdom that has but a short time and will burn up and will be no more.
This is my reply:
Thanks for bothering to write back. BUT: Genesis 5:1-2, - you are misreading in here: Do read that verse with understanding means: GOD created us/humans in 3, (in short: Spirit created SPIRITS) SPIRIT = Me SOUL = consciousness = being creates as an conscious being BODY =clothing (something to dwell in) The way you read that verse, dose proof that satan has messed up or proofs that - that one reads bible without understanding. For the BIBLE is a book from SPIRIT to SPIRITS aka FROM GOD TO HUMANS. And being created as male or female meaning: being able to multiply. The word : multiply means: to create new generations. Luke 14:26 - the real meaning, meaning of the verse: you cant serve CHRIST/GOD while hanging out with unsaved/ still wicked sinners. = you`ll be still found as a wicked sinner and not a saved soul. And to love GOD 1st - He give us our existence. He created us in spirit 1st - then give us a body (carnal for now but spiritual later). Why shouldn`t i love GOD 1st and not my parents? - For i`m GOD`S creation and not my parents (earthly parents). - GOD is the Father of the whole mankind. (Therefore a parent/Heavenly Father to me as i`m a born again soul who`s sins are forgiven and to never again remembered). let`s put it that way (maybe help better to understand) - There is unsaved souls - unrepented souls who haven`t get things right with GOD (sins forgiven) and there is saved souls - saints - the true Christ followers. Luke 13:5 | View whole chapter | See verse in context I tell you, Nay: but, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish. Luke 13:3 | View whole chapter | See verse in context I tell you, Nay: but, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish. And there`s also 3 verse that i didn´t find but the wording goes like that: GOD HAS CALLED EVERY MAN EVERYWHERE TO REPENENCE. The questions i ask here is: Why are leaving satan - the old devil - the serpent out of the life picture? The reason for you to misread the gospel is: you are missing the helper and the comforter : THE HOLY SPIRIT who: John 14:16 | View whole chapter | See verse in context And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever; John 15:26 | View whole chapter | See verse in context But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me: John 14:26 | View whole chapter | See verse in context But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you. The way you read the gospel now is the way satan wants us to read. Receive the helper: THE HOLY GHOST and say to satan: get behind me satan, never tempt me again.
Leo,kas sa mingil moel Ukraina kindralstaapi saad nõustada?
Kas siis ukraina ei ole ida-euroopast lennukeid juurde saanudki?
Koguja 8:8 Ei ole inimene tuule valitseja, et ta tuult võiks peatada, ja
kellelgi pole meelevalda surmapäeva üle; sõjast ei ole pääsu ja
ülekohus ei päästa seda, kes ülekohut teeb.
9 Seda kõike ma nägin, kui ma tähele panin kõike tööd, mida tehakse
päikese all: on aeg, mil inimene valitseb inimese üle, et temale
11 Kui otsust kuriteo kohta kiiresti ei tehta, siis kasvab inimlaste
julgus kurja teha.
12 Ehk küll patune teeb sada korda kurja ja pikendab oma päevi,
tean ma siiski, et neil, kes Jumalat kardavad, käib käsi hästi,
sellepärast et nad tema palet kardavad,
13 kuna õela käsi ei käi hästi ja tema ei pikenda oma
varjusarnaseid päevi, sellepärast et ta Jumala palet ei karda.
Ei saa leppida selle miinimum eesmärgiga! See on pikemas perspektiivis uus sõda või sõja jätk.
Venelastel siis platsdarm olemas,võivad seal käia täismundris
miks peab olema eesi ukraina prioriteet keele ja riigi võimuüleandmine kes sellest rikkaks saab.?++
Tasing juuutuubis Ukraine keelseid site jälgida. Muidugi tore varrukamärke vaadata😉
Vale hurt! Ma just rääkisin üle eile Ukraine asüülidega. Öeldi et Ukrainian on reservis 1.5miljonit ja kõike hoitakse varuks. Et pole vaja ise hakka Nd vabatahtlike aga Ukraine ei suds proffesionaale vastu võtta kui riiki tormab
Pool
ukrainlasre palk on kaks korda kõrgem kuid r4iik oli ikka eesti mitte ukraina, see veel riiki ei tee kui keegi magab pagulasega 7 korda päevas?
kumb kunnase arvates võidab? ma pakuks ,et ukraina. venemaa lootis et kahurilihaga võetakse ukraina ära
Sa valetad, Slovjansk voiti juba eile ara :)