NM7 5 Gauss Quadrature

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 33

  • @evanjones8049
    @evanjones8049 4 роки тому +5

    I have been trying to learn this for hours now and this is the only video that I was able to understand. Thank you so much!

  • @juniorcyans2988
    @juniorcyans2988 Місяць тому

    We just did this in class today, but I didn't understand. Now I feel good! Thank you so much!

  • @rahmaakareem3955
    @rahmaakareem3955 Рік тому

    I tried to learn this concept from the text book.. it took me an hour but was nothing in ma head.. but this video... worth every sec i listen..

  • @lentil68
    @lentil68 3 роки тому

    This is the best video i think i've ever seen. Ty!

  • @yeratret8010
    @yeratret8010 Рік тому

    U are the best!

  • @patrickmoore6351
    @patrickmoore6351 2 роки тому

    That was extremely helpful. Thank you for the explanation!

  • @johannschonwald2304
    @johannschonwald2304 2 роки тому +6

    does anybody know how to solve those nonlinear equations for four variables ?? nobody explains that, and it is very confusing that in the scripts from university it is only written: "one can solve those and see, that..." also in this video there is no concrete algorithm, maybe newton/banach?? im confused

    • @craighalpin1917
      @craighalpin1917 Рік тому

      Have you figured it out... if so I'm trying to figure it out right now...

    • @DeckerCreek
      @DeckerCreek 2 місяці тому

      ua-cam.com/video/3jilhl2zp9A/v-deo.htmlsi=8A8EA6nho00_qiUX

    • @rozangangsar340
      @rozangangsar340 6 днів тому

      @@craighalpin1917 so... have you figured it out too?

  • @itinerantscientist8502
    @itinerantscientist8502 6 місяців тому

    Thanks! Great video for engineers. I'm currently trying to understand how do they apply Gauss Quadrature to estimate the composition of hydrocarbon mixture based on TBP curve.

  • @empty7990
    @empty7990 3 роки тому +2

    But how these constant values u find

  • @eduardofabris8523
    @eduardofabris8523 3 роки тому

    Thank you so so much! It helped a lot

  • @DanaWebb2017
    @DanaWebb2017 6 років тому

    Thats pretty clever method.

  • @andres111999
    @andres111999 7 років тому

    muy buena explicación. se entendió todo.

  • @byronohene-adu5104
    @byronohene-adu5104 8 років тому

    Great explanation. Thanks!

  • @abelhecker
    @abelhecker 4 роки тому

    Awesome explanation, thanks a lot :)

  • @Amr-hb2wh
    @Amr-hb2wh 8 років тому +1

    Hey Thanks a lot for this explanation but when you say plug that function in Gauss Leg. @ 14:44 what do you mean by that as it seems my only problem to get ahead on this problem, thanks again for the help.

    • @31337flamer
      @31337flamer 8 років тому

      u cant use the function inside the integral from start (2x + 3/x)^2 .. u need to use the shifted version to get your result
      he uses the new term inside the new integral for I to use it as f.
      he is shifting the boundaries so u need the new values for x in your starting function. thats what its all about .. shift to (-1, 1) -> calculate shifted x for your function and "plug it in" use it as your f to get the approximated result.

    • @Amr-hb2wh
      @Amr-hb2wh 8 років тому

      It's never too late,as a matter of fact you replied just in time for my test tomorrow, Thank You.

    • @shudidesai
      @shudidesai 7 років тому +4

      I mean it sometimes is too late, like if he replied the day after your test? ;?

  • @WithASideOfFries
    @WithASideOfFries 8 років тому +2

    Watching the introduction, I'm a bit confused. Why not use optimization to find critical points that represent the most optimal x-values to produce a trapezoid that best approximates the area under the function?

    • @numericalmethodsguy
      @numericalmethodsguy 6 років тому +3

      If we do that, then we will have computationally inefficient algorithm as the critical points would vary from function to function. Moreover finding them would be itself a challenge.

  • @huzash6977
    @huzash6977 6 років тому +1

    You are a god

  • @ivanluthfi8832
    @ivanluthfi8832 7 років тому +1

    thank you for the explanation, very useful

  • @wil8538
    @wil8538 Рік тому

    15:18 i calculated this and result is I=25,8322, but difference between I and true I is 0,0011 and in video its 0,0012 so its almost the same, interesting...

  • @solomontamirat1355
    @solomontamirat1355 5 років тому

    how to calculate 20 node brick element in finite element method

  • @michaelcastrillon6372
    @michaelcastrillon6372 7 років тому

    Gracias

  • @GundoganFatih
    @GundoganFatih 4 роки тому

    Thank you, very nice explanation.

  • @sandlouis5046
    @sandlouis5046 4 роки тому

    Thanks!!!!!!!!

  • @abelhecker
    @abelhecker 4 роки тому

    thanks !!!!

  • @kepler_22b83
    @kepler_22b83 Рік тому

    Thnx

  • @ninakoch1799
    @ninakoch1799 6 років тому

    thank youuuuuu😍❤️