“Back to the Future: ZANUPF’s Succession Battles”.

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 11

  • @israelrangarirai9543
    @israelrangarirai9543 6 місяців тому +1

    That Muleya has some stuff ❤

  • @JonathanZwane-y4b
    @JonathanZwane-y4b 6 місяців тому

    Zanu PF killed people and the economy of Zim and Even today they keep on milking the resources of Zim through corrupt ways.Zim must forget about Zim if want to fix all their problems,even these former Zanu PF members (G40) still want to eat as everyone can see.

  • @chikovobell6520
    @chikovobell6520 6 місяців тому

    Muleya's assessment is not far from the flow of events....

  • @ivychigonga3366
    @ivychigonga3366 6 місяців тому +1

    Kasukuwere still defending Mugabe this day and edge , you started this vamugabe wacharamba wachingotonga.

  • @chikovobell6520
    @chikovobell6520 6 місяців тому

    Cde Tyson, you guys (G40s), blundered by tying your fortunes to Bob's wife in the succession issue... It was a blow below the belt... No matter, be that as it may your clear route to the 🇿🇼 presidency is through returning to the chimurenga party ZPF...

  • @chikovobell6520
    @chikovobell6520 6 місяців тому +3

    My assessment is that this is a confederacy of ZPF haters bcoz:
    1. New projects - why personalise govt projects to RGM? Did you expect the ED govt to dump all beneficial projects becoz they were started by Bob...
    2. Unconstitutional stay in power: Why call it unconstitutional when there are clear methods of amending it... If these constitutional steps are taken, what's the problem...
    You can dislike /hate him or his chimurenga party but try to use factual information to advance your argument....

    • @Blackmoses2
      @Blackmoses2 6 місяців тому +1

      You are having a stinker on the comment section.

  • @chikovobell6520
    @chikovobell6520 6 місяців тому

    But Cde Tyson do you not see how you're defending Bob's unconstitutional approach to use his wife to choose the successor yet you're attacking ED for doing exactly the same thing.... what's going on?