Who WON The NFL Offseason?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 16 тра 2024
- In this video, we go over our favorite offseason performances this year. That's free agency, re-signings, trades, and the Draft!
Stick along with us throughout the offseason as we try to make entertaining content with no new NFL occurrences!
Follow our Socials!
Gabe - / ftpanderson
Elijah - / ftpjah - Спорт
Vikings offseason is sneaky, if JJ works out it's incredible.
Swapping Hunter for Greenard has to work out, keeping Aaron Jones in the north is a great decision, and the draft may look great on paper but it came at the cost of a LOT of future picks, moving up from the 2nd to 23 and then again from 23 to 17, it’s risky but if it all pays off it’ll be looked back on as a masterclass for sure.
@@FranchiseTagged Hunter for Greenard cost less and they got a younger player. Van Ginkel and Turner provide a pass run rotation. Jones will mentor younger players at the position. Darnold is seasoned from the niner's and only 26. Cashman is a hometown boi who will fill a need. They now have talent at almost all positions and 100+ cap space next year to fill in gaps with veterans.
I’m not disagreeing with you, but their lack of picks hurts a lot especially if ANY of their picks this year don’t pan out how they hope. They paid a big premium to get jj and Turner, if they aren’t instant impact players they’ll be suffering for it for a long time, especially in one of the strongest divisions in football.
@@FranchiseTagged It will be a crazy division now, but they still have their 1st next year. They will get one, if not two comp 3rds with Hunter and Kirk walking. Along with some compensation from the Kirk tampering. The cupboard is far from empty.
@@FranchiseTagged Flores walked into MIN & turned The Worst Defense into a 16th after losing their top-2 defensive players. Yes, the lost Hunter, but got 3 other players. Whatever he's doing seems to work By Committee than by Individual Star. Still, we have to wait & see. But my Vikings' Luck-o-Meter says the defense gets better.
The QB situation on the other hand...
I ask this questions whenever I hear someone say Ridley was an overpay and no1 responds. Everyone quotes that 96mil when in reality it was, 10m, 28, then either cut for 10 or keep for 26. It was a 46mil deal unless he balls out like crazy and they decide to keep him.
What would be a fair deal for him in your opinion?
Edit: titans are still estimated to have 50mil in cap space next year before rollover and the usual more than expected cap bump. Not sure that matters to you but thought I would put it out there.
In my opinion giving a 29 year old WR who is coming off a season where he was easily WR1 in an offense with an elite QB and barely posting 1000 yards 46 million dollars of guaranteed money is an overpay. Face value of 23 a year is a WILD overpay but even if you don’t look at the full contract and you assume that they’re gonna cut him (then why give him that long of a contract) it’s still an overpay because he’ll be 30-31 when his cap hit is 28 million.
If he’s bad it’s an overpay no matter what you give him. If he’s good, you can’t cut him so it’ll be an overpay because you’re giving out that full contract.
I still did mention that I like them putting talent around Levis, I just think that his contract is a bit much for his age and current production.
Edit: whoops forgot the fair deal question, I think Jakobi Meyers is on Ridley’s level, he’s only 27 and was just over 800 yards as the clear 2 in the raiders atrocious offense, he signed a 3 year $33 mil deal last offseason and yes money has changed and cap space has changed but going from 11 a year to 23 a year for the same production just doesn’t seem like a good move.
I understand what the Titans are doing. Both their old GM J-Rob who was running things like he was the son of the owner & Vrabel both seem to have done things that ruined their rep *among players.* So they're trying to change that as well as say "we're willing to spend $ to win."
But Ridley still seems like an overpay. He hasn't returned to form. It's as simple as that for now. They _should_ use him differently than how the Jags who failed him did, but we don't _know_ that yet.
Los Angeles rams baby Lombardi coming back to LA
They did have some great additions this off-season, but Aaron Donald’s retirement is such a impact we couldn’t mention them
@@FranchiseTagged understandable everybody saying this but I think they gonna surprise you guys 👀
My Detroit Lions will be seeing you, Primetime, week 1 👀. May the best team win
@@FranchiseTagged can’t wait rams win
Packers did better than most of those teams🤷🏿♂️
I’d actually argue they had one of the worse offseasons in the league, not the worst, but not great. Kicking Aaron Jones to the curb after all he’s done for them is diabolical, losing savage to add McKinney is a slight step up? But even then, keep the guy who knows the system IMO. Drafted well enough, maybe a slight reach in the first but good picks in the 2nd with cooper and Bullard, but then a RB in the 3rd? After signing Jacobs? In a division that’s undeniably becoming one of the strongest (Vikings gonna Viking) in the NFL, they didn’t do enough to move the needle for me.
If they do well next season and make it further, it’ll be off the back of Jordan Love’s continued breakout and the receiving weapons getting better, not the moves made this offseason.
(Also, Jordan Love needs a new contract and if he keeps this up money will be very tight in the near future)
@@FranchiseTagged Getting off of an oft-injured running back approaching 30 for one 3 years younger and also led the league in rushing just 2 seasons ago is diabolical? Hilarious and you can’t be serious saying that McKinney is a slight step up from savage is joke when darnell has been inconsistent at best his entire career, including a benching a couple of seasons ago. And we got a new coordinator so there’s a gonna be a new system anyway, we’re literally switching from a 3-4 back to a 4-3. And the need for a backup was there considering the fact that we had to rely on AJ Dillon most of the year last year which was an unpleasant experience and offers more versatility to our offense. Through free agency and the draft, we added high impact players and depth to a roster coming off of nail-biting loss to the Super Bowl runner up in the second round putting us in prime position to be a contender next year. To ignore that shows bias on your part considering one of you guys are Lions fans. Also, Jordan’s contract will be taken care of soon, don’t worry about cap space, this front office always knows how to add good players every season whether through the draft and or finding low cost gems such as Rasul Douglas and Devondre Campbell in recent years
@@yannicekonyaole4078Josh Jacobs was not very good last season, certainly not as good as Jones. What’s hilarious is how you gloss over this fact. Jacobs averaged almost a full yard less per carry than the other Raiders RB, White. Maybe Jacobs will rebound but it looked like he lost a step last season. Overall, Packers off-season was mediocre.
Just checked PFF, Jacobs was the 2nd best RB on the Raiders last season.
@@paulieprinceton4550 Funny how you say I’m glossing over facts when you failed to mention that Jones had less yards than Josh even in a down season where opponents were loading the box due to the severe lack of competent quarterback play. Of course Zamir managed to have a higher yards per average, teams weren’t game planning for him and no one in their right mind would say he’s the better running back. It is also hilarious that you could read my previous comment about how well the packers offseason was and still call it mediocre without any legitimate counter arguments. Sounds to me like you’re just a bitter division rival🤷🏿♂️
Go Bears!
I cannot condone this as a lions fan.
@@FranchiseTagged haha Hey, pretty much every fan base was cheering for the Lions last season. Go win a ring.
I take it back, I like this one.