"School is not where you are there to learn all the time, its more like a social place", this type of thought make some miracle..... Hats off to her confidence, smartness and intellect......
Playing chess back in 2003 was amazing and it was fun competing against young players, like myself, and even having the occasion of teaching a young girl how to play. I would consider myself to be one of the strongest players in my age group, but certainly not the best. I confess I have cheated without realizing before (only once against someone who could play but wasn't an expert), but then after learning one of my lesson from him which is similar to the one I'd probably have learned from my brother, I played normally and gained more experience so that I would become stronger.
Kasparov , Carson , Fisher , Tal etc. You can argue about who is "King of Chess " but when it comes to the "Queen of Chess " there is only one JUDIT POLGAR
Daaym you can see the intelligence sparkling in her eyes. Also the interviewer asking some stupid questions. This idea that rational thinking is a male trait - wtf? Taking me back to 1800s
It is a male trait, women tend to think more emotionally than men. Evolutionary Psychologists have long shown via studies that the male and female brains are different. This is an overall difference though and individuals can run counter to this, you can get women with more male brains and vice versa. Also it wasn't the interviewer that brought it up, she voluntarily said that it's been said that she has a male brain.
The only thing that astounds me about Judit Polgar as far as chess is her calculation for the senseless immolation of her pieces and (somewhat) of her knowledge on positional chess which is probably as much as my knowledge on positional chess as a FIDE master for her 99% knowledge on tactical motifs. Though, I sometimes deliberate over why I sometimes draw against super grandmasters when I go over positional chess in my head or in my erudition before a match or super tournament.
+M Andrews I have. Well, not super grandmasters (sorry), but grandmasters. I think I did exagerrate. It's been so long since I've posted this comment. Nice mordant humor, which I didn't exactly get when I'd first read your comment. Judit Polgar even mentioned in one of her chess books that her positional knowledge was not so elaborate. I've studied so much about positional chess that I know very well that my chess intuition is nothing compared to her's. Though, she is more logical and aggressive, like Kasparov, but I'm more "careful" (how IGM Mihai Suba would put it) and restrictive. My positional knowledge is very elaborate. She's read more books on chess than I probably ever will, but I was (I think ^_^) comparing my chess style with her's. I have to admit, I did exagerrate, or did not make myself in such fanfaronade.
But school is also a good place to find what you like to do, your passion. You try a lot of different sports, math, art and so on. Specializing in one thing might be good but you need to know what you want first. Judit might be very talented in chess but what she is passionate about is football for example. Then it wouldn't be right to make your child into a chess master if she would be happier as a footballer.
Was there no council of ethics that opposed the father's experiment on his future children? I mean, it feels like today this would be considered a crime. No? I might be wrong.
If you think about it, every mother and father is, willing or not, doing an experiment on the child development. Judit's "experiment" was quite harmless and eventually fruitful compared to many others...
Piaget is the biggest criminal then. As long as you don;t force the mother to keep producing children and the children to do whatever you want and whenever you want.
Mike Beta Yes and the same time no. Polgar's ELO (peak) listing is 2735.Yifan's listing is 2686. Polgar was effectively No1 female player for 25 years. Very few people (man or woman) can even remotely pretend something like this. Yifan still has the time to achieve this kind of excellency. Polgar already did it.
Kramnik is a former world champion, a 2800 Super Grandmaster who dethroned Kasparov and one of the two or three greatest positional players of all time. There's no shame in losing to him.
"School is not where you are there to learn all the time, its more like a social place", this type of thought make some miracle.....
Hats off to her confidence, smartness and intellect......
Judit Polgar has the best laughter on the face of the earth. Contagious.
Judit is one of the.mosf charming world class geniuses ever.
I like when she say "...hunt for the king..."
Judith Polgar has the most wonderful personality. Makes me proud to be Hungarian.
100%
Lovely interview! Thanks!
Im a big fan because of her confidence in herself..
Judith Polgar is such a class act. Her interview made me remember how Kasparov cheated during one of their games when she was young.
you are a fucking idiot
@@Co6521es That would be you.
Playing chess back in 2003 was amazing and it was fun competing against young players, like myself, and even having the occasion of teaching a young girl how to play. I would consider myself to be one of the strongest players in my age group, but certainly not the best. I confess I have cheated without realizing before (only once against someone who could play but wasn't an expert), but then after learning one of my lesson from him which is similar to the one I'd probably have learned from my brother, I played normally and gained more experience so that I would become stronger.
Very smart father and like father like daughter :)
I love her
She is a genious beautiful And Sweet lady
This is a lowkey insult to her and her family's work.
It is true
@@mathieup.corbeil894 How?
Was she on the Jay Leno show in 1992 along with Brandon Lee?
Very beautiful
"Chunt for Kingh" Man- the essens of chess has never been descirbed so simple and so sexy!
😅
where can I read the book 《how to educate the genius》in English? Who can help me ?
Kasparov , Carson , Fisher , Tal etc.
You can argue about who is
"King of Chess "
but when it comes to the
"Queen of Chess "
there is only one
JUDIT POLGAR
great lady- the best
could someone tell me who were the other guests in this show besides Judit ? Thanks.
One of them is now the president of Finland
Maravilla guapa Judith polgar
She’s beautiful
If she has a male way of thinking perhaps men should think more like her.
+John Toth Toth Everyone should think more like her.
girls are girls males are males 1 cant have the each other's propeties.
Daaym you can see the intelligence sparkling in her eyes. Also the interviewer asking some stupid questions. This idea that rational thinking is a male trait - wtf? Taking me back to 1800s
It is a male trait, women tend to think more emotionally than men. Evolutionary Psychologists have long shown via studies that the male and female brains are different. This is an overall difference though and individuals can run counter to this, you can get women with more male brains and vice versa.
Also it wasn't the interviewer that brought it up, she voluntarily said that it's been said that she has a male brain.
feminists are very happy with her but they forget that she is the only women in the all time top 100 chess players
great
The only thing that astounds me about Judit Polgar as far as chess is her calculation for the senseless immolation of her pieces and (somewhat) of her knowledge on positional chess which is probably as much as my knowledge on positional chess as a FIDE master for her 99% knowledge on tactical motifs. Though, I sometimes deliberate over why I sometimes draw against super grandmasters when I go over positional chess in my head or in my erudition before a match or super tournament.
A FIDE Master whose positional knowledge is the equal of a 2700+ Super Grandmaster and former number #8 in the world? Riiiiiiiiiiiight.
+M Andrews I have. Well, not super grandmasters (sorry), but grandmasters. I think I did exagerrate. It's been so long since I've posted this comment. Nice mordant humor, which I didn't exactly get when I'd first read your comment. Judit Polgar even mentioned in one of her chess books that her positional knowledge was not so elaborate. I've studied so much about positional chess that I know very well that my chess intuition is nothing compared to her's. Though, she is more logical and aggressive, like Kasparov, but I'm more "careful" (how IGM Mihai Suba would put it) and restrictive. My positional knowledge is very elaborate. She's read more books on chess than I probably ever will, but I was (I think ^_^) comparing my chess style with her's. I have to admit, I did exagerrate, or did not make myself in such fanfaronade.
+Daniel Acosta *did not make myself clear
anda laar jeputa
But school is also a good place to find what you like to do, your passion. You try a lot of different sports, math, art and so on. Specializing in one thing might be good but you need to know what you want first. Judit might be very talented in chess but what she is passionate about is football for example. Then it wouldn't be right to make your child into a chess master if she would be happier as a footballer.
Wonderfull lady
Judit you are a killer chess player you beat the best in a male dominant game You are a lovely lady but you put aggressive on the 64 squares
This is why she isn't at the top. No one else trying to share the burden of the mother.
I want her to be the boss of me 😍
Was there no council of ethics that opposed the father's experiment on his future children?
I mean, it feels like today this would be considered a crime. No? I might be wrong.
Syeal7, Yes, there was but the passed every exam without going to school every day.
If you think about it, every mother and father is, willing or not, doing an experiment on the child development. Judit's "experiment" was quite harmless and eventually fruitful compared to many others...
Piaget is the biggest criminal then. As long as you don;t force the mother to keep producing children and the children to do whatever you want and whenever you want.
Magnus was probably just being nice calling her “dangerous.” Secretly he sees her as a pushover.
Tbf, so is everyone else in the world for Magnus
Красивая и умная! Опасная смесь!
Не красавица, но очень женственная и сексуальная , очень притягательная внешность и голос приятный.
IQ of 170 She has. I scored it to.
Mines 79
How do you know that she has a iq of 170 ?
Mines is 80 . lulz
I think someone with an IQ of 179 would be able to spell "too" 🤣
I bet your IQ is closer to room temperature.
yifan hou,,is the best
Mike Beta Yes and the same time no. Polgar's ELO (peak) listing is 2735.Yifan's listing is 2686. Polgar was effectively No1 female player
for 25 years. Very few people (man or woman) can even remotely pretend something like this. Yifan still has the time to achieve this kind of excellency. Polgar already did it.
Why don't you ask her about her score against Kramnik ? loss loss loss every single time..
Kramnik is a former world champion, a 2800 Super Grandmaster who dethroned Kasparov and one of the two or three greatest positional players of all time. There's no shame in losing to him.