Impressive. Breeder reactor and closing the nuclear uranium fuel cycle is what the world needs to make clean and plentiful energy. However, there was another promovideo on this UA-cam channel, which I like more; it compared the reactor to a stove which was producing new wood, while burning wood. It was more instructive than this video. I used the former one to promote breeder reactors here in EU.
Реакторы БН это скорее экспериментальная серия для отработки технологий. В Северске строится реактор БРЕСТ-ОД-300, где теплоносителем будет безопасный свинец, а не опасный натрий. И работать он будет на МОКС топливе и так же давать обогащенный уран (и еще массу всего полезного), как и реакторы БН. У нас огромное количество отработанного топлива, которое мы получали от многих стран, так что топлива для реакторов на свинце у нас будет на тысячелетия. Но самое главное: В России разрабатывают ядерно-термоядерный реактор. Если проект увенчается успехом, то это будет безграничный источник энергии и для его работы не нужен будет экзотический гелий-3, а вполне обычное и доступное топливо.
@@Mikhail_Utkin Немного поправлю: БРЕСТ ОД 300 -хехе- будет использовать нитридное топливо, а не оксидное. А про "давать обогащенный уран" я не совсем понял. БРЕСТ тоже быстрый, и тоже выдает плутоний, только давать будет больше, чем БН, чтобы для самого себя замкнуть цикл.
@@nedward.7442 Нет, не плутоний, а именно уран. Плутоний он бы выдавал на полном цикле МОКС топлива, но его не будет. Поэтому там и будет завод для МОКС топлива, которое не будет до конца выгорать в реакторе, что бы с него получать уран, а не плутоний.
This truely impressive and makes Russia the most advanced nuclear nation in the world.period. hats off to Russia. I am impressed! Modern controll rooms as well.
Great presentation. Russian nuclear technical proficiency is world class and deserves recognition and employment. It would be good to build more BN-800s also in other countries, to increase familiarity and confidence in fast reactor technology.
@@Yair44 for exchangeable goods/energy (oil, coal) of course - there are plenty of countries taking whatever cheap oil/gas they can get. But Russia showed the world it is willing to use its energy to blackmail countries not acting in the interest of Russia (at least it did so with Europe). Others will think twice, before making commitment like what Germany did with their gas dependency.
@@Linuxhippy2 а что сделала Россия ? Германия и ряд других стран ,забрали деньги у России ,которые она держала в их финансовой системе за продажу газа и нефти . мало того что Германия деньги за газ забрала ,так еще и сделала невозможным будущею торговлю ,заблокировав счета . Германия заблокировала "северный поток 2" ,а США взорвали "северный поток 1" . Германия и ряд других стран ввели эмбарго на поставки Российского газа и нефти . есть еще одна нитка "северного потока 2" ,которую США еще не взорвали ,но Германия запрещает её использовать . вы там сума сошли что-ли ? у вас там есть в голове мозги ? мне правда интересно :) я думал что Шольц пошутил сказав то что ты сказал ,думал это обман такой .но ты повторяешь ,тоже самое ,смешно ,правда смешно :)
I hope Russian gov continuing MKER-800 or MKER-1000 reactor project (RBMK Retrofited) I think that's design is more efficient and cheap than PWR type reactor belong with BN-800.....
1) Yes, it is cheaper, but for now there are only places in the calculations. 2) No, not more effective. Graphite reactors use more fuel (VVER 1000 80 tons of uranium, RBMK 1500 180 tons), despite less enrichment of the 235 isotope there will be more (although now fuel enrichment for VVER is being increased, so it makes no sense). 3) These reactors have problems with disposal due to graphite.
It's still a developmental reactor, there's not a lot of experience with commercial SFR use (unlike the hundreeds of Submarine and commercial LWR), and the Russians use still many Nuclear plants in load following mode, once the tech becomes better understood is likely to get similar load factors to the VVERs that very often surpass 105%
Wait a minute! @ 6:46 "A reactor emergency cool down system where regular air is used." This is a sodium reactor. Sodium reacts with the oxygen to create sodium oxides. This fuel will be hot. Should water vapor be present from the outside... toxic radioactive gases will pressurize the anulus. It's a chain reaction that SHOULDN'T occur in the first place. The emergency environmental air cool down system looks dangerous. Can there be a situation where air makes contact with sodium?
The air will cool the heat exchanger. It's not coming into contact with the sodium. The best analogy would be the radiator of your car engine. The air flows over it, cooling the fluid inside which then cools the engine. This works in a similar way.
@@namthieu5906 Corrosion of stainless steel is real. I´m assuming the reactor is build with 316 SS, but even then then the corrosion rate is unknown. Check this research out: reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S1738573321002874
@@AndreasAndu651 The daearator is only part of a water loop as far as i can tell: www.researchgate.net/figure/PFBR-Flow-Sheet-FULL-SCOPE-REPLICA-SIMULATOR-PFBR-Prototype-Fast-Breeder-Reactor_fig4_273636720
@@jooch_exe yes I know, the corrosion between sodium and alloy steel including ASTM A312/TP316 will be occured, due to there are many components in the alloy steel including: Fe, Cr, Ni, Mo, Mn... therefore, the electrochemical reaction between alloy steel and sodium will be happened, But It takes place so slowly, maybe a few micron meter / year. In engineering It can be accepted. In additional, the timelife of reactor is 60 years, maybe more than 60 year the thickness of reactor will be critical. Thank you!
There were already a lot of leaks on the BN 600, including contact between sodium and water. As a result, it is in good health and will eventually work for 60 years. 2) On the BN 800, the fire safety systems are more developed, so there have been no leaks on it yet, they have time to be detected and eliminated.
And looking at that cross section view of the reactor, you can see that there’s no proper protective concrete shell on top the reactor which should be a worldwide safety standard. (This same mistake was made at chernobyl when it was built) making this even more dangerous. You can see that all they put on the roof are metal sheets held by beams.
@@skibididopyesdop 1) On the BN 800 there is a fire safety system; leaks are eliminated even before they grow. 2) Small fast reactors may not have a containment, because cooled with sodium rather than water.
@@nedward.7442 It does not matter if it has a fire protection system, a concrete containment is still a standard that should be enforced worldwide. If the fire prevention fails, then what? On top of that this reactor is super unstable because of the possible condensation. It will just leak in the outside air? They are obviously trying to keep this as cheap as possible by cutting corners everywhere and getting rid of essential safety standards.
@@skibididopyesdop I can partially agree with you. And the point of fire safety is to find small sodium leaks and fix them before they get bigger. But I didn’t really understand about the instability of the reactor. By the way: the future BN 1200 will have a pressurized shell, which is good.
This reactor proves how far ahead Russia is in nuclear power technology than the rest of the world.
It seems you are really proud of Russia, otherwise you would not open 5 posts praising it ;)
I like that FN reactors much! Friiendly greetings from Czechia!
Looks like Russia is the leader in fast reactor technology. I really like the idea of more energy with less fuel and waste. Congratulations.
Impressive. Breeder reactor and closing the nuclear uranium fuel cycle is what the world needs to make clean and plentiful energy. However, there was another promovideo on this UA-cam channel, which I like more; it compared the reactor to a stove which was producing new wood, while burning wood. It was more instructive than this video. I used the former one to promote breeder reactors here in EU.
Реакторы БН это скорее экспериментальная серия для отработки технологий. В Северске строится реактор БРЕСТ-ОД-300, где теплоносителем будет безопасный свинец, а не опасный натрий. И работать он будет на МОКС топливе и так же давать обогащенный уран (и еще массу всего полезного), как и реакторы БН. У нас огромное количество отработанного топлива, которое мы получали от многих стран, так что топлива для реакторов на свинце у нас будет на тысячелетия. Но самое главное: В России разрабатывают ядерно-термоядерный реактор. Если проект увенчается успехом, то это будет безграничный источник энергии и для его работы не нужен будет экзотический гелий-3, а вполне обычное и доступное топливо.
@@Mikhail_Utkin
Немного поправлю: БРЕСТ ОД 300 -хехе- будет использовать нитридное топливо, а не оксидное.
А про "давать обогащенный уран" я не совсем понял. БРЕСТ тоже быстрый, и тоже выдает плутоний, только давать будет больше, чем БН, чтобы для самого себя замкнуть цикл.
@@nedward.7442 Нет, не плутоний, а именно уран. Плутоний он бы выдавал на полном цикле МОКС топлива, но его не будет. Поэтому там и будет завод для МОКС топлива, которое не будет до конца выгорать в реакторе, что бы с него получать уран, а не плутоний.
This truely impressive and makes Russia the most advanced nuclear nation in the world.period. hats off to Russia. I am impressed! Modern controll rooms as well.
Great presentation. Russian nuclear technical proficiency is world class and deserves recognition and employment. It would be good to build more BN-800s also in other countries, to increase familiarity and confidence in fast reactor technology.
well other countries will think twice before selecting russia as a "partner" now.
@@Linuxhippy2 "countries think" is wrong. One ugly country is trying to think, the others obey its stupid decisions, for now.
@@Linuxhippy2 Nah, maybe 20% of the countries.
@@Yair44 for exchangeable goods/energy (oil, coal) of course - there are plenty of countries taking whatever cheap oil/gas they can get. But Russia showed the world it is willing to use its energy to blackmail countries not acting in the interest of Russia (at least it did so with Europe). Others will think twice, before making commitment like what Germany did with their gas dependency.
@@Linuxhippy2
а что сделала Россия ?
Германия и ряд других стран ,забрали деньги у России ,которые она держала в их финансовой системе за продажу газа и нефти .
мало того что Германия деньги за газ забрала ,так еще и сделала невозможным будущею торговлю ,заблокировав счета .
Германия заблокировала "северный поток 2" ,а США взорвали "северный поток 1" .
Германия и ряд других стран ввели эмбарго на поставки Российского газа и нефти .
есть еще одна нитка "северного потока 2" ,которую США еще не взорвали ,но Германия запрещает её использовать .
вы там сума сошли что-ли ? у вас там есть в голове мозги ? мне правда интересно :)
я думал что Шольц пошутил сказав то что ты сказал ,думал это обман такой .но ты повторяешь ,тоже самое ,смешно ,правда смешно :)
I hope Russian gov continuing MKER-800 or MKER-1000 reactor project (RBMK Retrofited) I think that's design is more efficient and cheap than PWR type reactor belong with BN-800.....
They won't continue with old second generation reactors, now it's VVER and BN
1) Yes, it is cheaper, but for now there are only places in the calculations.
2) No, not more effective. Graphite reactors use more fuel (VVER 1000 80 tons of uranium, RBMK 1500 180 tons), despite less enrichment of the 235 isotope there will be more (although now fuel enrichment for VVER is being increased, so it makes no sense).
3) These reactors have problems with disposal due to graphite.
Truely impressive!
Is it possible to get the 3D models of the reactor used for the animations in this video for a school project?
Would be nice if y'all could work more on this kind of stuff, and less on launching missiles at other nations.
Нет, мы будем пускать ракеты пока враги не закончатся
@@BogdanDotPy Then maybe fire them at Kremlin, because that's where your enemies are. Asshole.
Russia is the world leader in nuclear technology
why did it say media offline?
sorry! I posted this working version for agreement. 😊 and forgot to post the finished version.)
An editing program will show a media offline error when a part from their timeline is moved or renamed, and then rendered. It happens.
Beautiful video Thank you. Such an amazing and complicated structure.
Oh they are building a breeder reactor
Love from 🇮🇳to this Nuclear Power plant ❤️👍👌
The availability of ~70% is not astonishing at all.... What's the reason?
It's still a developmental reactor, there's not a lot of experience with commercial SFR use (unlike the hundreeds of Submarine and commercial LWR), and the Russians use still many Nuclear plants in load following mode, once the tech becomes better understood is likely to get similar load factors to the VVERs that very often surpass 105%
Wow
this is so cool
What the integral fast reactor should have been
Wait a minute! @ 6:46 "A reactor emergency cool down system where regular air is used." This is a sodium reactor. Sodium reacts with the oxygen to create sodium oxides. This fuel will be hot. Should water vapor be present from the outside... toxic radioactive gases will pressurize the anulus. It's a chain reaction that SHOULDN'T occur in the first place. The emergency environmental air cool down system looks dangerous. Can there be a situation where air makes contact with sodium?
No
The air will cool the heat exchanger. It's not coming into contact with the sodium. The best analogy would be the radiator of your car engine. The air flows over it, cooling the fluid inside which then cools the engine. This works in a similar way.
How much heat are they dumping into the Enviroment or is this conected to a district heating system?
They aint warming the globe
What happens if the sodium comes in contact with water .
This will never ever happen, top world class russian security technology prevents this ;)
How do they deal with the corrosion of the sodium?
Daearator
The corrossion by sodium occurs only with aluminium. The piping and reactor shell are mostly made of alloy steel so no occur here.
@@namthieu5906 Corrosion of stainless steel is real. I´m assuming the reactor is build with 316 SS, but even then then the corrosion rate is unknown. Check this research out: reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S1738573321002874
@@AndreasAndu651 The daearator is only part of a water loop as far as i can tell:
www.researchgate.net/figure/PFBR-Flow-Sheet-FULL-SCOPE-REPLICA-SIMULATOR-PFBR-Prototype-Fast-Breeder-Reactor_fig4_273636720
@@jooch_exe yes I know, the corrosion between sodium and alloy steel including ASTM A312/TP316 will be occured, due to there are many components in the alloy steel including: Fe, Cr, Ni, Mo, Mn... therefore, the electrochemical reaction between alloy steel and sodium will be happened, But It takes place so slowly, maybe a few micron meter / year. In engineering It can be accepted. In additional, the timelife of reactor is 60 years, maybe more than 60 year the thickness of reactor will be critical. Thank you!
so könnte man daß Atommüllproblem wunderbar lösen
Greifswald Kernkraftwerk.
@@jyotirmayamohanty5723 Wird stillgelegt und abgerissen.
I say if sodium comes in contact with water it will go 💥
Do you actually know what a heat exchanger is?
@@Exodus199 do you know what a leaking heat exchanger is?
There were already a lot of leaks on the BN 600, including contact between sodium and water. As a result, it is in good health and will eventually work for 60 years.
2) On the BN 800, the fire safety systems are more developed, so there have been no leaks on it yet, they have time to be detected and eliminated.
🇺🇦🇺🇦
А на русском есть?
Конечно. Наверно на канале Белоярский есть.
@@stranavfx хорошо, спасибо
Which software they used for this animation?
Your reactor go 🤯💥
Puck Futin.
🤨
Condensation could set that bomb 💣 off . You built a bomb 🤣 it might as well be Chernobyl.
And looking at that cross section view of the reactor, you can see that there’s no proper protective concrete shell on top the reactor which should be a worldwide safety standard. (This same mistake was made at chernobyl when it was built) making this even more dangerous. You can see that all they put on the roof are metal sheets held by beams.
@@skibididopyesdop
1) On the BN 800 there is a fire safety system; leaks are eliminated even before they grow.
2) Small fast reactors may not have a containment, because cooled with sodium rather than water.
@@nedward.7442 It does not matter if it has a fire protection system, a concrete containment is still a standard that should be enforced worldwide. If the fire prevention fails, then what? On top of that this reactor is super unstable because of the possible condensation. It will just leak in the outside air? They are obviously trying to keep this as cheap as possible by cutting corners everywhere and getting rid of essential safety standards.
@@skibididopyesdop
I can partially agree with you. And the point of fire safety is to find small sodium leaks and fix them before they get bigger. But I didn’t really understand about the instability of the reactor.
By the way: the future BN 1200 will have a pressurized shell, which is good.
А я понял буржуи строят , значит продали технологию разработчиков СССР и модернизируют ее уже не русские и так везде и во всем
НЕ надо врать. Вообще-то именно российский Атомстрой, как подразделение Росатома строит АЭС. Разработчики - проектные научные институты все из России.