Nice! If you actually look at the website and not just the video, it got a good rating, and the Top Safety Pick +. This is an improvement from the 24' model.
@@Claroboy911Tf you whining about?! It received a Top Safety Pick+ award overall. It received “Marginal” for the rear occupants chest in the updated, Moderate Overlap Front test, which scored Acceptable overall in that test.
@@lennygarrison6836 Marginal chest protection but acceptable overall means just that. Its overall assessment is acceptable however, the rear dummies chest recorded moderate injuries. If your loved ones are worth risking for possible chest and organ injuries in the rear seat of your forester be my guest. “It’s acceptable though” is just not enough for MY loved ones.
If you check the rating details, it's the mediocre rear passenger protection that dragged the rating from G to A. Subaru has always been good with its frontal passenger protection. But not so much for rear passengers. And its entire lineup suffers this issue
@@Claroboy911I mean, I’m smart enough to know that IIHS awarded the ‘25 Subaru Forester a Top Safety Pick+. And yet, you’re acting like the Subaru did terrible. Again, you’re dumb! Everyone can see that!
Nice! If you actually look at the website and not just the video, it got a good rating, and the Top Safety Pick +. This is an improvement from the 24' model.
yet others scored good, go home subaru fan boy
The 2024 Impreza crash test results aren't what they NEED TO BE either. Boo Subaru!!
Seeing that the 2025 is an ALL NEW model, I expected it to do better.
at least its better than marginal
Do better in what way? 😂😂😂
It isn't all new, it is just a moderate refresh of the current Forester.
Whats the airbag in the quarter glass for?
Probably an extension
Dog?🐕🐶
why not, prevents broken glass from entering as well
I love seeing comments ranting, nagging, and yapping about Subaru when clearly there are worse performers in this new test that deserve the hate
Improvement? It’s acceptable
@@spelisha Marginal for chest protection. That’s terrible
@@Claroboy911Tf you whining about?! It received a Top Safety Pick+ award overall. It received “Marginal” for the rear occupants chest in the updated, Moderate Overlap Front test, which scored Acceptable overall in that test.
@@lennygarrison6836 Marginal chest protection but acceptable overall means just that.
Its overall assessment is acceptable however, the rear dummies chest recorded moderate injuries. If your loved ones are worth risking for possible chest and organ injuries in the rear seat of your forester be my guest. “It’s acceptable though” is just not enough for MY loved ones.
If you check the rating details, it's the mediocre rear passenger protection that dragged the rating from G to A. Subaru has always been good with its frontal passenger protection. But not so much for rear passengers. And its entire lineup suffers this issue
❤️🔥IIHS❤️🔥
cousin bought!
It looks like a car form 2005
Subaru cars have always looked outdated...
How, To me, it looks like a Ford Explorer. Your exaggerating
And yet this will age better than any of the overstyled hyundai/kias
@@RBLXCT Yeah, one from 2005
Nice improvement Subaru
*subaru
Agree!!
the new honda passport looks good... er, sorry subaru passport.. or honda forester??
Wow that's safe
Yeah, more improvement over the 24 Forester
Yikes, I’m done with Subaru.
Love makes Subaru, Subaru
Lol this dude is dumb! 🤦🏻♂️😂
@@lennygarrison6836 lol, you’re somehow smarter for this😂
@@Claroboy911I mean, I’m smart enough to know that IIHS awarded the ‘25 Subaru Forester a Top Safety Pick+. And yet, you’re acting like the Subaru did terrible. Again, you’re dumb! Everyone can see that!
It earned the highest rating possible from IIHS (Top Safety Pick+).