Really adore the way you explain and teach, very concise and clear, with your own characteristics. Hope someday you can share some teaching experience for the aspect of being a successful tutor/teacher. lol~
There is a problem: there are too many inequality signs instead of equality signs, for example (k^2)*2 - (k+1)^2 > 2*(k^2) - (k^2 + 2k + 1) -> they are equal. The remaining signs follow.
@6:20 "I know that two to the k is bigger than k squared." Do you? Isn't that what you set out to prove? (There was no assumption of truth for 'Method 2'.) 🍌🤔
2 years late, but when using the principle of induction you assume what you want to prove is correct. After assuming it's correct (which it is for the base case), we prove it's true for the next term (creating a domino effect). The reason we do this, is if we know atleast one case is correct (base case), the next must be correct, so is the next (that's what I meant by a domino effect)
These are delightful, professor! Thank you.
new subscriber... dont stop teaching sir! You are helping people
Like the caveats at the end of video. Great job! So many interesting problems out there
Really adore the way you explain and teach, very concise and clear, with your own characteristics. Hope someday you can share some teaching experience for the aspect of being a successful tutor/teacher. lol~
What graphic tablet do u use for teaching? Please reply
I feel like we get hyped up for these videos much more than the students who need them. Or just me?
+me
:( i just did my discrete math :( i needed this
There is a problem: there are too many inequality signs instead of equality signs, for example (k^2)*2 - (k+1)^2 > 2*(k^2) - (k^2 + 2k + 1) -> they are equal. The remaining signs follow.
2^n lớn nhanh hơn n^2 khi n lớn hơn 4.
@6:20 "I know that two to the k is bigger than k squared."
Do you? Isn't that what you set out to prove? (There was no assumption of truth for 'Method 2'.)
🍌🤔
2 years late, but when using the principle of induction you assume what you want to prove is correct. After assuming it's correct (which it is for the base case), we prove it's true for the next term (creating a domino effect). The reason we do this, is if we know atleast one case is correct (base case), the next must be correct, so is the next (that's what I meant by a domino effect)