Frank Schaeffer's Disappointing Testimony

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 9 жов 2024
  • Gary reviews the works of Frank Schaeffer, and how they contradict each other and send mixed signals about Schaeffer's worldview and life.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 84

  • @almanzaalex
    @almanzaalex 6 років тому +18

    No Theocracy. No Dominionism. Thanks Frank!

  • @twitcher73
    @twitcher73 13 років тому +6

    I'm reading Patience With God right now, and I actually agree with much of what Frank says about the current church culture in North America. I struggle with many of the same conclusions he has come up with: It is consumer driven and celebrity populated; it is about entertainment and self aggrandizement; there is far too much of the "us vs them" mentality. While his case resonates with me, I also don't feel that the answer is to essentially attack and "liberalize" the doctrine of the church.

  • @Mojosbigstick
    @Mojosbigstick 13 років тому +5

    Frankie switched? So did Saul.
    It's not possible that a man can (God help us), see the light.

  • @edgwaterprog
    @edgwaterprog 12 років тому +15

    @c42u You people just cannot accept the moral bankruptcy of the religious right. When someone who knows about the problems, they accuse him of being mentally unbalanced. Sounds like he is more like a prophet than Samson to me.

  • @HS-pz3sq
    @HS-pz3sq 3 роки тому +4

    He switched from protestant to orthodox and then to atheist!. This guy doesnt know what he wants.

    • @Journey_of_Abundance
      @Journey_of_Abundance 2 роки тому +2

      He may have "switched" to Orthodox but he clearly never left the relativistic, individualistic protestant mindset.

    • @grimlund
      @grimlund Місяць тому

      He knows. He is were he wants to be now. Once you leave all the religious nonses you cant go back.
      Its impossible. It would be like believing in Santa again.

  • @kulchara
    @kulchara 11 років тому +4

    I disagree with Gary, because he does not respond to any of the key Frank's questions on Historic Church, which are central to what he says and does. However, I can't understand Frank's support for Obama either. How can anyone (especially Orthodox) believe in this pre-arranged 2-party system?

  • @remcbride2008
    @remcbride2008 8 років тому +8

    Gary, you missed the whole point.

  • @edgwaterprog
    @edgwaterprog 12 років тому +3

    @twitcher73 There may be a difference between "liberating" doctrine from the right-wing Christian corporatist leaders that Schaeffer discusses and "libertine" doctrines that the right-wing always accuses the left of supporting.

  • @john2115
    @john2115 9 років тому +9

    A Christian does not believe in a book. We believe in our Lord Jesus Christ. Yet we revere the book deeply. Worldview-The Beatitudes our Lord gave us display this already...while He also left us His Church..and it still stand today--just as He said.

  • @RodneyJohnstone
    @RodneyJohnstone 9 років тому +8

    Yep I have had a complete switch in worldview; it happens! It means I'm honest with myself, admitting that at least I was wrong in what I believed. I wish more fellow Christians would apply "test all things" in their doctrinal beliefs (especially if they are in a particularly weird and modern Protestant faith)

  • @bethcasteel
    @bethcasteel 7 років тому +4

    There are many of us: "Recovering Evangelicals" ...it's ugly out there, people...no wonder Jesus turned over the money tables at the temple. And yes, you can believe in God and not embrace the modern day church...especially the money grubbing campuses across this country. yes, Frank enjoys the fellowship of the Eastern Orthodox Church. It's unchanged...close to the original ...

  • @maajoour
    @maajoour 13 років тому +6

    Maybe Franky made a switch because he saw the truth. What else could he do? So, Gary, you need to allow for the possibility that Franky is right. Or are you afraid of the truth?

  • @TheDebmarci
    @TheDebmarci 7 років тому +7

    I would love to see Frank Schaeffer go up against John MacArthur...

    • @gonzo4996
      @gonzo4996 3 роки тому

      I would like to see John MacArthur go up against the real biblical Jesus Christ!

    • @grimlund
      @grimlund Місяць тому

      Why? MacArthur is a fundamentalist. And a calvinist. He is insane. There is no meaning in having a debate with those kind of people.

  • @bubbatheking9225
    @bubbatheking9225 4 роки тому +1

    He left the deep end in '84.

  • @andrewthomas9598
    @andrewthomas9598 6 років тому +9

    Maybe you should stop judging the man

  • @momijiyamanishi4548
    @momijiyamanishi4548 4 роки тому +2

    I see that it's not about his living in his dad's Shadow. It's Frank seeing the reality and the contrast of a very real condition in America a situation that's extremely frustrating to deal with

  • @archon3363
    @archon3363 9 років тому +8

    How can you judge someone you don't even know? What did Jesus say about judging other people? Frank is genuinely seeking the truth. Unlike some...who think they OWN the Truth. You obviously have never genuinely sought to find the truth and have never even ventured on the path. If you did then you would know that repentance means changing your mind and seeing things more clearly. When I was younger I used to idolize my father, now that I am older I know what a ratbag he really was...Frank went through the exact same thing.

    • @ontologicallysteve7765
      @ontologicallysteve7765 5 років тому

      @Archon33 Says not to judge>>>>>>>>proceeds to judge someone's judgment.

    • @surroundsound754
      @surroundsound754 Рік тому

      @@ontologicallysteve7765 Where is @archon33 judgement?🤨

  • @RobertMahoney1969
    @RobertMahoney1969 14 років тому +8

    He beat the drum for the religious right, now he beats it for the religious left. As an Eastern Orthodox Christian I can say that many, many, many of us find him to be an embarassment.

    • @felixdk8727
      @felixdk8727 Місяць тому

      The church is an embarrasment

  • @coachfun1987
    @coachfun1987 6 років тому +13

    Wow...someone who changes his mind, perspective, and beliefs. The horror. 🙄

  • @kulchara
    @kulchara 11 років тому

    I was familiar with Frank's 1990-ies version. Having wached some of his recent interviews I myself see that his views have changed since 1990-ies....

  • @lenztooob
    @lenztooob 9 років тому +6

    Is Schaeffer correct when he says there is no such thing as correct belief? He presents as quite confused and angry!

    • @mjipa6302
      @mjipa6302 7 років тому +3

      +Bob Lenz Nope, he is not right. Orthodoxy is the ancient true belief. He changed since the '90. He is not speaking on a Google stage for no reason. If he was to speak orthodoxy, he wouldn't be there.

    • @lenztooob
      @lenztooob 7 років тому

      My question was really rhetorical. Schaeffer is proposing an oxymoron. If he's right about correct belief, then he's wrong because he would be correct.

    • @ontologicallysteve7765
      @ontologicallysteve7765 5 років тому +2

      If there's no correct belief...then that *must* also include *his* beliefs. Thus, making his own argumentation completely and utterly irrelevant. It's a self-defeating, circular argument. How anyone can come to these conclusions after becoming Orthodox is beyond me.

    • @busylivingnotdying
      @busylivingnotdying 5 років тому +1

      (Is there no such thing as correct belief). My opinion is: there IS such a thing as "truth" but thinking that our little "monkey-brain" is going to separate out the absolute pure correct conclusions about such things - or even be able to fathom ultimate reality, would be self delusion of the highest order!

    • @noaheinstein2369
      @noaheinstein2369 5 років тому +1

      ORTHODOXY- My love, is it possible that you don’t even know what Christian orthodoxy is? There was no orthodoxy until the 4th century AD when Emperor Constantine convened the council of Nicaea. Constantine saw that “unifying” a religious belief system was critical to raising a “Christian Army” to rule and expand the Roman Empire. Hence the 430 bishops at Nicaea we’re tasked with throwing out all prior thoughts and beliefs about the ecclesiastical meaning to be found in the life and teachings of Jesus, and hammering them down to a set of beliefs that would define in rigid terms the Christian religion.
      Unfortunately, the new “orthodox” believers (Roman Church) then confiscated the church buildings and treasuries of all churches and Christians whose beliefs about Jesus differed from this new Orthodox Church (Nicene Creed believers) in Rome. At that point the now unified and powerful Roman Church partnered with Constantine to rob and often kill the “heretics” who disagreed with their Nicene Doctrinal creed.
      But was the new church Orthodoxy actually correct according to the vision and purpose of Jesus Christ? Of course not. It came way too late to reflect the essential beliefs and person of Jesus. Orthodoxy today only means conforming to the 4th century Roman Church, beliefs about Jesus, but it NEVER meant conforming to the beliefs of Jesus himself or his chosen disciples who lived 300 years before the Nicene Creed was even written.

  • @liveacousticsound
    @liveacousticsound Місяць тому

    Nice try Gary! Frank is gifted as you said, but not just in past tense. He clearly runs circles around you!

  • @stevenking6129
    @stevenking6129 2 роки тому +2

    Frank is the truth teller.

  • @felixramos1608
    @felixramos1608 Рік тому

    You're the only one that sounds angry 😅

  • @gonzo4996
    @gonzo4996 3 роки тому +2

    No man ever believes that the Bible means what IT says, he is always convinced that it means what HE says.-George Bernard Shaw

  • @mallit
    @mallit 7 років тому

    What disturbs me with all these issues is :- You are either a follower /disciple of Jesus Christ and want to obey His teachings or NOT... If you are , you could be called a Christian, if you are NOT, then why would you even want to call yourself a Christian.!!!!????? It`s like buying a Jaguar but insisting you drive a Rolls Royce.!!

  • @clicclark9048
    @clicclark9048 7 років тому +2

    It's good that he had jumped out of the frying pan of Evangelicalism ~ but it's bad that he landed into the fire of unbelief!

  • @Contraction1205
    @Contraction1205 Місяць тому

    Hit piece.

  • @HanYhak
    @HanYhak 8 років тому

    Great post, brother.

  • @pelorix4969
    @pelorix4969 10 років тому +4

    Why is this video even a thing? Haha

  • @almanzaalex
    @almanzaalex 7 років тому +2

    NO THEOCRACY

    • @gch8810
      @gch8810 2 роки тому

      No secular theocracy.

  • @1integrity
    @1integrity 10 років тому

    Thanks for exposing Franky's hypocrisy as you read of Franky's own positive testimony of his parents' love when he wrote 'A Time for Anger'!

  • @lueffee
    @lueffee 12 років тому +1

    guess what!!!! Christianity is not the only religion, Frank who maintains his christian beliefs, he just shed the light on the judging nature of what Christianity has become. This was not Jesus' aim to judge, and condemn like so many Christian do. Jesus loves us ALL, God loves us all, the only ones who can judge would be God him/herself. The Christian Right would like to control you, and make you give up you freedoms. Frank is just now making an act of contrition. Yes, he is sorry.

    • @gch8810
      @gch8810 2 роки тому +1

      He isn't a Christian now.

    • @Journey_of_Abundance
      @Journey_of_Abundance 2 роки тому +1

      When you become more concerned with the people speaking out against sin rather than concerned with the sin itself, I'm sorry but I really don't believe egomaniacs like Frank.

    • @ChocolateHabanero22
      @ChocolateHabanero22 4 місяці тому

      You sound like a universalist, is that what you hold too?

  • @michaelvout7813
    @michaelvout7813 4 роки тому +2

    A very depressing, hypocritical attack on a man of great integrity.

  • @digginyourscene4058
    @digginyourscene4058 5 років тому +1

    Spurgeon suffered of depression. Rich Mullins was an alcoholic. Thomas was a doubter. Peter, a liar. Frank-- honest.

    • @Journey_of_Abundance
      @Journey_of_Abundance 2 роки тому

      Clearly, he is not an honest person. His narrative has changed drastically multiple times throughout his life. Dude is an egomaniac

    • @surroundsound754
      @surroundsound754 Рік тому

      @@Journey_of_Abundance Why egomaniac?

  • @edgwaterprog
    @edgwaterprog 12 років тому

    @taosimplicity Great point.

  • @niarlatotepbasset
    @niarlatotepbasset 8 років тому +5

    ...Frank Schaeffer is a true Christian...

  • @argirisargi1221
    @argirisargi1221 8 років тому

    he is an orthodox, so he has to hit the brake stop, regret,and ask for forgiveness,no speaking or write books but pray and God will show the way,AGAIN

    • @Journey_of_Abundance
      @Journey_of_Abundance 2 роки тому

      This egomaniac is in no way representative of Orthodoxy. Most Orthodox are far more right wing than evangelicals.

    • @surroundsound754
      @surroundsound754 Рік тому

      Egomaniac? Have you done any research on him and his beliefs? He comes across as a very humble man! Let's not judge him like the Pharisee. Let's' rather be the publican. God wants our heart and judging Frank is judging the Lord openly since we're on the internet. Why worry about another man's garden when you and I, both, have our own gardens to tend to. As a devoted Orthodox Christian of over 10 years, I would say certain views appear to differ slightly from what Orthodoxy teaches however I dont know him and we must not take all these small videos so seriously and out of context.... Do you know HOW many Christians believe differently than what they are taught? All of them... Just look at how we all live our lives...Where is the love? Compassion? Giving others the benefit of the doubt? Humility? For example... If you're a Christian, you've just showed what you believe by calling him a derogatory name but is it my place to judge whether you're a good representation of Christianity? You know only God can judge Zach. With all the evil happening in our world, we honestly dont have time to judge but to love. God bless us and have mercy on us all.🙏💕☦

  • @ChiroMan61
    @ChiroMan61 5 років тому +1

    I guess this means Gary here has sold his soul for Trump.

  • @panzermarche
    @panzermarche 12 років тому

    Liberalisim is dead : All hail Progressivism.

  • @sergiosatelite467
    @sergiosatelite467 6 років тому

    I wonder if Gary is into children. He’s got that look.

    • @carlosidelone8064
      @carlosidelone8064 6 років тому +1

      Uhhh . . . what in the hell look is that ?

    • @scottcarter1689
      @scottcarter1689 5 років тому +2

      @@carlosidelone8064
      Apparently the look Sergio sees in the mirror. What else can one surmise?.

  • @momijiyamanishi4548
    @momijiyamanishi4548 4 роки тому +1

    I see that it's not about his living in his dad's Shadow. It's Frank seeing the reality and the contrast of a very real condition in America a situation that's extremely frustrating to deal with