Really nice work, David! Sounds perfect from your description, but we are not the arbiters of our own work sometimes in this profession. I have learned over the years that filmmakers have their reasons for things working or not. The thing I do differently now (as opposed to when I first got into this business) is to never submit anything that I am not 100% happy with, so if they're happy, I'm happy; if they're not, I've got a great piece to show off, or use somewhere else. Looks like you did that here. Congratulations!
Actually this is excellent! perfect example of sophisticated minimalism . Gratulations! To judge if the rejection was fair it depends on how it goes with the story. Anyways, considering the description alone i would never reject it. Great end titles
Good composition. But every time a phrase ends, have a feeling that suddenly pulls out of the carried emotion. Not sure if this was the intended result. Regards.
Really nice work, David! Sounds perfect from your description, but we are not the arbiters of our own work sometimes in this profession. I have learned over the years that filmmakers have their reasons for things working or not. The thing I do differently now (as opposed to when I first got into this business) is to never submit anything that I am not 100% happy with, so if they're happy, I'm happy; if they're not, I've got a great piece to show off, or use somewhere else. Looks like you did that here. Congratulations!
"The BEAUTY of a rejected cue! " Alex North
Actually this is excellent! perfect example of sophisticated minimalism . Gratulations!
To judge if the rejection was fair it depends on how it goes with the story. Anyways, considering the description alone i would never reject it. Great end titles
I like this! (Sounds much like something Pat Metheny would write.)
Good composition. But every time a phrase ends, have a feeling that suddenly pulls out of the carried emotion. Not sure if this was the intended result. Regards.