Dayi 6x17 Panorama Back
Вставка
- Опубліковано 20 жов 2024
- In this video, I discuss my experience using the Dayi 6x17 panorama back over the course of 11 years. Additionally, I briefly review some of my images taken with this back on my 2023 fall trip to Zion National Park.
My original 6x17 video: • 6x17 Roll Film Holder ...
Making a wooden frame for a Graflok back: • Large Format Photograp...
Niko Nikkor 150mm SW lens review: • Nikon Nikkor 150mm SW ...
Zion on Expired Film: • Fall Colors on Expired...
/ @chrisdarnell
/ @nickcarverphoto
Filmed on the Canon R5C.
By clicking the links below, I may earn commission on any products that you purchase.
Film Stocks:
35mm Kodak E100: amzn.to/3J9L8Lw
4x5 Kodak E100: amzn.to/49lMptH
35mm Kodak Ektar: amzn.to/3U65StR
4x5 Kodak Ektar: amzn.to/4apyXGf
8x10 Kodak Portra 160: amzn.to/4cOHHY4
120 Kodak Portra: amzn.to/3vyTnxE
35mm Kodak Portra 400: amzn.to/4aGxlb2
35mm Kodak Portra 800: amzn.to/4aDRgYJ
35mm Kodak Gold 200: amzn.to/3PPinr2
35mm Ilford Delta 100: amzn.to/4aofGFm
120 Ilford Delta 100: amzn.to/4cLslnc
4x5 Ilford Delta 100: amzn.to/3xqQi34
8x10 Ilford Delta 100: amzn.to/3U7bnsb
Travel Gear:
Labels: amzn.to/3vJuY8t
Pelican 1615 case: amzn.to/4ahT3Cf
Pelican 1510 case: amzn.to/3PMa9A5
8x10 Film Changing Tent: amzn.to/441I2D7
4x5/5x7 Film Changing Tent: amzn.to/3U4FgcE
Film Changing Bag: amzn.to/3VP5cu7
Digital Alternative:
Fujifilm GFX 100II: amzn.to/4aKgDYo
Fujifilm GF100-200mm: amzn.to/3TQmd4J
Fujifilm GF80mm: amzn.to/3PQulRk
Fujifilm GF45-100mm: amzn.to/3xov5ab
Fujifilm GF20-35mm: amzn.to/43RCvPo
Camera Gear I use in my videos:
Camera Body: amzn.to/3PrFg3Z
85mm Lens: amzn.to/3v0Z0Ef
50mm Lens: amzn.to/3SWnzKJ
Camera Power Supply: amzn.to/3SZZmmD
Wireless Lav mic: amzn.to/3Imi2Iq
Shotgun mic: amzn.to/3ThkA0M
Video Main Light: amzn.to/3uTw1SV
Video Light Modifier: amzn.to/3V4tC2n
Video Background Light: amzn.to/3PrFBnh
Light Stand: amzn.to/42YWA5I
Backdrop: amzn.to/3TksBB1
5-in-1 Reflector: amzn.to/49SRtq3
Tripod: amzn.to/3SYUcaG
Tripod Head: amzn.to/49Sr0ZC
Travel Tripod: amzn.to/3wCZ8KH
Tripod Mounting Plate: amzn.to/3Irbd8h
Teleprompter: amzn.to/3YNA5jZ
Film Scanning Gear
Wet Mounting Tray: amzn.to/3VAUeIr
Hi Tony, Thanks for another informative and entertaining video. I routinely print 20 inch X 60 inch archival pigment prints with good result. My experience is that biggest factor relating to apparent sharpness is the viewing distance. Since my large images are viewed from 5 to 6 feet away, they appear tack sharp. This of course won't apply to other photographers who will invariably view your ridiculously large print from several inches away!
Awesome! There's something special to seeing your work printed. I appreciate your support and encouragement of "ridiculous" humor! 😂
What a nice idea: 11-year review, none of those reviews after one photo session. Interesting to see, I'v been considering one for years but the drawbacks.. I've been so happy with my 15 or so yrs old DaYi 6x12 back. If I had a 5x7 camera I'd probably have got one as 6x17 back for 5x7 camera uses normal ground glass and can use any focal length.
One often overlooked method for panos is a dark slide that has been cut in half. I got one ready made such for my 4x5 allowing me to shoot 2x5 panos, two shots per sheet. Not quite 6x17 but wider than my 6x12 back gets me. Easy to make one yourself too and weights nothing. Easy to carry with just in case too. Cuts film cost by 50% too when you get 2 panos per sheet instead of one crop.
The drawback of cur darkslide is funky viewing angle as you need to use rise/fall heavily. That makes viewing ground glass not as nice.
A half cut darkslide would allow using 8x10 for more resolusion too with 4x10 panos and should cost nothing but a piece of plastic to cut.
Yes, this is my preference: 6x17 flat back from DaYi on 5x7 camera, technically clean.
That's a very good point! The 5x7 wouldn't limit you like the 4x5. Thanks for your support!😃
There is also a decent economical 6x17 camera system Chroma Six17 from Steve Lloyd. Lee Pengelly is sharing his experience with the camera here. I bought one even been charged with VAT from UK export.
@@RadovanFaltus There are couple of those, I think some other brand had rise too (that I find very useful). They have pretty large drawbacks like large lens cones you need per lens and if you shoot with other large format cameras, you cannot share lenses like with lens boards.
@@hoggif That is right, limitations are there. I am sticked with 90mm lens, if I wanted to switch between focal lengths, i would carry another lens plus a cone combo. Still however you do have focusing on screen precision and exchangable film backs, cool for the price.
I've been very happy with 1/2 dark slide from interpid on a 4x5 camera. Gives you around 125x45mm negatives (1:2.78). No lens limitations. 4 shots per 4x5 sheet film holder seems like a great alternative to 6x17 and is in fact a much more compact setup than my horseman 6x12 roll film holder.
Good idea. Thank you for sharing with all of us!😎
I love the Pro 400H image that you mentioned had light glow reflecting within the park. Especially that bottom image - just wow, beautiful. I also think that magenta hue of the expired film looks great!
Thank you Jay! I appreciate your support! 😃
As always thanks for the tips, great video
Thanks James! I appreciate your ongoing support. 😃
So nice follow up!
Thank you my friend! 😎
As always, super informative and entertaining.
Thank you my friend! I appreciate your support! 😃
A word on the 75mm lens for 6x17: It works pretty well with this back (I have used it for a while) and is pretty much the lower end of the focal length range you can use with these backs. Maybe the 72mm lenses will work, too. Only thing is: You need a camera which can handle these lenses, I used it on a Wista with a wide angle bellows. I eventually sold my back because I didn't like the handling, although I love panoramic images. Using a 5x7" camera with such a back is probably a good alternative way to go. I never thought about it.
I bought one of these backs for my 4X5 Crown Graphic back in 2017. I took the setup to the Alabama Hills in the Eastern Sierras (California) to capture the sunrise in the boulders. I did get some stunning results but have not used the combo since. My issues are these, I don't have the wall space for 4-6ft wide print to give it proper justice and secondly, social media is just not the right place to show off the results effectively and finally, I don't want or need the hassle of selling prints. However there is hope, enough time has passed that I'm feeling the need to give it another try just for the challenge. Thanks for the video.
Thank you for sharing your story with us. Having a purpose for the photographs we take is a challenge I’ve grappled with. It definitely has made me more selective. I appreciate your support. 😎
4x5, 8x10? Many years ago I purchased a 5x7 Korona built in the 1920's with full front and rear movements. Film choices are limited, but my 4 3/8" (111mm) Dagor provides perfect coverage and gives me full 17 width. I just crop the top and bottom as appropriate to compose the image. Strange, but I also like the 450mm Nikkor on the 5x7. Very interesting perspective. Because it is a 5x7 there is no rear standard interference. Also the 5x7 is much lighter than the 8x10. Thanks once again for the GREAT video.
Very interesting! Thanks for sharing with all of us! I appreciate your support.
It's a great video~!
Thanks very much! I appreciate your support!
There's hum underlying the audio track (I'm listening with good headphones); easy to fix in post, but YT doesn't provide the option to just exchange the video. Regarding an alternative to a 6x17 back on a 4x5 camera - a 5x7 camera, since it gives the full 17 cm, even with longer focal lengths. The format is a bit "exotic", though, and film stocks in this format are limited. Still something to consider (smaller and more light-weight than 8x10, but larger than 4x5). An interesting side note on 5x7: its ratio of 1.4 resembles the ISO A formats (1.414, the square root of 2).
I’ve been trying to figure out why I have that hum. It’s been happening since I switched to a shotgun mic. Any suggestions welcome. Thanks for your support.😎
@@tonysantophotography Sounds like shielding or grounding issues (not uncommon). Depends on how you connect the microphone, and your AD converter (microphone input box or whatever you use). Hard to explain, because I'm German and do have problems with the US terminology in this field (I studied electrical engineering in the early 80s, and it was all German at this point ;-)). First step could be to just use another cable. A quick fix is to just use the appropriate filter in your audio processing (a 60 Hz notch for the US, I'd say, but most software has a specialized hum filter; since your voice does not contain such low frequencies, it should be a viable solution).
@@c.augustin Thanks for the suggestions. I've tried different cables at varying price points but they all perform the same. I'll look into a filter. Thanks again! Tony
I started with this back but then I liked the format so much that I have purchased a Shen Hao SH617 which is easier to work with. Expensive, yes
So cool! Thank you for sharing your experience with us. I appreciate your support! 😀
I've had the Dayi 617 back for about a year now and I've had two real problems with it. One is it can get a light leak through the dark slide slit. I just don't remove it all the way now. The other is I have not been able to leave a roll in the back for any length of time as the roll gets loose and fat rolls on me. I've adjusted the metal tabs inside but it doesn't really help. I wish it had some kind of ratchet system so the roll could not roll backwards and loosen up or at least a knob on the left side so I could tension the film. My favorite lenses are my 135 Nikkor and 90mm Rodenstock. I have to use a recessed lens board on the 90mm to achieve infinity focus but it works and I also have the center filter for it. BTW if you have a 5x7 camera laying around they do make a 617 back for that and you will not have issues with the frame getting cut off by the rear standard on any lens.
Jason, That's an excellent point! I often forget about the 5x7 format because I don't own one but that would definitely be a good solution to the back limiting the exposure of the film. I appreciate you taking the time to share with us. 😃
The Shen Hao 6x17 is an amazing camera. I did consider buying a panel back to go on my 4x5, but had the money to get the real thing. I don't have a single regret because it rapidly became my default field camera, so my 4x5 has increasingly been left at home. It helps that 120 film is cheaper and I can buy a much wider variety of stocks. I do need to buy a different lens, either a 115 or 90mm, but I'm not sure which to get. I'm in no rush though.
Awesome! That's a tough decision to choose between those lenses. I appreciate you taking the time to share with us. 😃
I guess I do not see an advantage to the 6x17 back over just cropping a 4x5. The High start up cost would over ride any roll film cost savings and then you have to pack the thing around. More bulk and weight is not great.