It got me thinking about using more or less oil. But I don't bother to change my behavior. Almost every product or service I use, uses oil someway or another
They don't care about the cause they protest nor that they'll antagonise people against their cause by their behaviour. All they care are pats on the back from fellow grifters and supposed activists. Literally all the want is recognition and clout. That's it.
@@twunt2000 It's absolute pain to be uncertain on whether THAT might have been their ACTUAL thought process. Like, the most sane assumption would be that they're reverse shills paid by some oil company to make activists look bad. But apparently we're in a timeline where it's always the most insane assumption to turn out as the correct one.
Van Gogh didn't see his own success in his own life, and died due to his poverty, depression/poor mental health, so I've got a particular soft spot for him and for the works he left behind. Generally, people who don't even like art, tend to admit his paintings in particular are pretty amazing.
Thing is though that it would be just as bad if they threw soup at somebody's Hello Kitty poster: it's not theirs, they have no right to try to wreck it, and they achieved nothing but looking like a bunch of dipshits (and, hopefully, getting significant fines and some actual jail time).
This isn't a form of protesting. This is a form of vandalism. No one is going to support the cause of someone who attempts to destroy rather than build. It's as simple as that.
That's the point. You can't convince me this isn't a psyop, because this group only ever does this kind of shit. It's not about making change, it's about making front-page news.
There are people who support leftism so I believe there will always be people supporting those who only seek to destroy and not build anything, that being said it's actually a win win situation and technically a good thing in the long run that they're doing this because the more they destroy what normies love the more normies will side with us however it's true that this has a completely opposite effect from what is intended
Its actually a form of propaganda thats designed to enable these oil companies. The executives that want too keep oil flowing completely understand your reasoning and are exploiting it. All they do is pay large sums of money to desperate poor people and the mentally unwell. They tell them to act unhinged for a good cause. Record and publicize said craziness they had a hand in. Then boom the general public associates environmental activism with these idiots. You are the target audience and the people with investments in oil production successfully manipulated you.
Cucks and simps. The entire EU (with a couple notable exceptions) has been disarmed, emasculated, and rendered helpless. Once proud nations have all bent the knee. 😢
My wild guess is they were afraid of the insane people hurting them if they tried to stop it. Also wondering if oil companies are secretly supporting these morons so any anti-oil activist can be lumped in with these nutjobs.
I swear the "just stop oil" movement is paid by the actual oil companies who want to make people who speak against oil look ridiculous in the future. Because acting like this is completely moronic in the most literal way possible.
Just so you all know, Phoebe (pink hair) grew up wealthy in a £4m Chelsea townhouse and went to a £45,000 a year private school. I know a few of these activists, they are often from super privileged backgrounds and won't have to worry about jail affecting their prospects
In so many words you have essentially said these people are suffering from privilege guilt and are easily swayed. I may have an investment opportunity in their futures!
they have a short sighted view and are dumb and arrogant to think they are righteous and anything they do is justified as long as its for their cause - like most tyrants in history. they don't understand that their desired out come would result in mass starvation. yes, we need alternative energy sources - no we can't just "stop oil" today.
Ah yes, the "right side of history" types. The types who don't have any intellectual value. They just want to be on the side they think will "win". Because then they can feel good about themselves.
@@ivenstorm which comes in a package made from foil which needs it as well as printed with ink that contains, wearing clothes that required it... I could go on but they can't be taught.
Did they target the Van Gogh pieces because they are OIL PAINTINGS? I said that sarcastically as a joke, but now I've typed it, it kinda sounds like the dumbass justification these guys would use
almost like people forget the natural existence of oil in it's non-synthetic form... Nah, plastic pops into existence the moment man wills it. That's what those fb posts tell me!
I mean her and the guy next to her looked like they escaped a mental institution. Probably still wearing the nice jackets before they walked into that museum.
Yeah true, that's why I say on the internet the same thing I'd say in real life cause too many people are comfortable saying whatever they want and it's just kinda annoying
I remembering watching an interview where the host disrespected Tyson. Tyson did not take it well calling the host a slur of names that were deserved. It got very uncomfortable quickly, just watching it. If Tyson were to go off, the host truly did not have an idea what Tyson could do to him. If he was lucky, Tyson with one blow would have killed him. If Tyson would have been controlled, in his rage, he would of dropped his IQ down to 1... PERMANENTLY. I doubt that anyone would have wanted to intervene. Even at 58, in his current shape, he would decimate 99.9999% of the populace into vegetables. So many sparring partners and fighters have said the first few blows, from Tyson, they knew it was over.
@@ErwinSchrodinger64 Then Tyson would get SUED SUED SUED for all hes worth. One might be able to punch the other in the face out of anger but that anger has legal consequences too. Mike Tyson lost his fortune- around 300million dollars from all his legal lawsuits and it cost him almost everything he earned. Not sure this is the moral story you think it is... 'Have enough money, you can lose it all to punch people who make you mad because you cant control your anger.' is a pretty poor way to say "Its over Anakin, I have the high ground."
These people are trying the ‘shotgun approach’. Just start shit anywhere, it doesn’t even have to be slightly related to their cause. Like the people blocking vegetable oil trucks… They themselves don’t even know what they are doing anymore. Edit: I also notice she wore some sunglasses. I sure hope that plastic doesn’t have oil products in there.
At this point I don't think their real goal is to raise awareness about climate change or whatever. I think they are just being paid to stir sh*t up but I don't know by whom.
I don’t support their actions in the slightest but this comment is so fucking dumb… half of people who comment on asmongold videos should be finishing high school instead of watching yt
I'm increasingly inclined to believe that these people were actually fake environmental activists hired by the oil companies themselves to pose as such and make the whole climate activism look bad. Or they're just shit for brains. They sure act like it.
Van Gogh’s life was marked by unimaginable struggles and heartbreak. He battled severe mental health issues, poverty, and rejection throughout his life. Despite creating some of the most iconic art in history, he sold only one painting while alive and lived in constant despair. His relationship with society was brutal-he was misunderstood, mocked, and even institutionalized. The tragedy of his life culminated in his suicide at 37 where he shot himself in the gut, leaving behind a legacy he never got to see celebrated. Damaging his work disrespects the resilience and pain behind each stroke of his brush. It’s a cruel reminder of the brutality he already endured
"Future generations will see us as being on the right side of history." No, they're going to remember you as a a bunch of dumbasses who think that crime is an acceptable means to justify the end.
civil rights movement, women's rights, general voting rights all used disruptive demonstrations and vandalism to garner attention. Historically you're the ones people look back on poorly.
@richw500 the point is philosophical tough, we care about the safety for the piece of art, but the reasoning behind is this. If the world ends, so does the painting that you so likely want to defend. Let's raise awareness about this subject, creating controversy. Here just to explain and nothing else. Remember that company have better PR teams than those activists. Have a nice day.
@@Aurius.Strangeyou're a moron. I care my private property and will defend it too. That doesn't mean I don't care about the earth. Climate panic isn't really about the climate it's for more control over people.
@boocackeedquackhead8454 it got your attention though didnt it? Yet you've made a conscious decision to be upset over a painting that wasn't damaged. LOL.
Yes, we don't fry chicken in motor oil ...but Petroleum products & derivatives turn up in a surprising amount of places. "Most hair dyes on the market belong to a class called coal-tar. The term coal-tar colors dates to the time when coloring materials were byproducts of the coal industry, though most are now made from petroleum".
One of the reasons the sentences are ´high´ is because there was a real chance they would have damaged the painting. There is glass covering the painting, but according to the judge ruling there was a real chance the soup would have seaped into the list and damaged the painting beyond repair. I have no words for the stupidity of these people, this doesn´t help their cause at all.
This is felony vandalism. The value of the painting is literally priceless too. So delicious watching these people screw themselves over and fail to damage the painting.
@@XD-cr3du no, it does not help their cause which is why it’s safe to say they are all industry plants. Which is why you’ll never see these people criticize Saudi Arabia
@@joshuaamado559 not priceless. But I think the price is in the hundreds of millions now, so as far as we paupers are concerned yeah, it might as well be priceless.
@@88Cbtthey got arrested and taught (said info likely went in through one ear and put the other) that the washable paint they used is harmful to and does not come off of the lichien that cover the monument
The kind of people with the arrogance to preemptively declare themselves "on the right side of history" almost always turn out to be on the wrong side in the end.
Even if I agreed with their stance I would think they were on the wrong side of history because they're actively harming their cause with their actions. They make me wanna take my car for a drive to no where in particular just to spite them. It's not even like their cause is something that needs 'awareness' brought to it by any means necessary because we've been hearing about the looming energy crisis since before any of those people were born.
@@thinkhector Yes, of course, but it's not because they care about the art, but because they know they would go to jail for a really long time if they actually destroyed a famous painting.
@@thinkhector Isn’t this the same group of people that was trying to deface statues or monuments or something a couple years ago? And you want me to believe they didn’t mean any harm Not only that even if you’re right, they’re still vandalizing property, negatively impacting a business and impacting people at an event who probably had to pay to be there. I don’t have any respect for this subhuman garbage and I don’t believe any of their claims that care about anything but “their cause” which I also don’t think they care about, they just want to be virtuous crusaders that can pat themselves on the back
@@zephid11 That would be fair is that was there intention, but they have been interviewed several times. They always go beforehand and make sure the paintings is protected by glass. And they have instructions to not proceed if it is not. They actually have no intention of causing damage. Think about it. They have done this more than a dozen times. If they really wanted to do damaged don't you think they use a hammer or saw and not soup? The news told you how to feel about it, and you swallowed it hook, line, sinker.
@@thinkhector Bzzt, wrong. They intended to destroy, the fact they are incompetent should change nothing in terms of punishment. Paintings fine. But if they had their way it wouldn't be. They should be punished and fined as if they had destroyed it as that was their goal. Then saying they don't actually want to destroy the thing they attack is an excuse given after the fact to cover their asses. And you believed them, hook, line and sinker. Why do you trust these people any more than you do the news? Why are you excusing their behaviour as if it is acceptable?
"just stop oil" While wearing clothing that oil helped make. While throwing soup that oil helped make. I bet they got there by some sort of transportation that used oil. Solid 10/10 they played themselves
I doubt these ones are rich kids. Most of them seem like the freaks of school, old ladies and all the dues are older men. Something I noticed with them a while back. And then compounded when I watched them do what they did at Stonehenge. Rich kids won't do something they know they'll go to jail for. They'd only do it in large crowds like Antifa or Palestine riots where they can wear masks.
Employees of the oil industry trying to make critics of the oil industry look like morons. Stop Oil, XR, and all these do-nothings are controlled opposition.
@@nolan_8 I would rather sit at home all day and smugly judge the world than actively vandalize property and make life worse for others. That way at least I'm not a net negative like those idiots who got jail time.
@@nolan_8 Perhaps they are doing something, but all they are doing and accomplishing is angering the people they are claiming to be trying to help. I would prefer them to be at home all day rather than intentionally making other people's lives miserable under the guise of trying to save the world.
@@nolan_8 you're a pro(re)gressive cultist just like these "activists" on the video, same side. These people care enough to do something, just not enough to clean their room or literally groom themselves to not look like a Beetlejuice.
"Activism is a way for useless people to feel important, even if the consequences of their activism are counterproductive for those they claim to be helping and damaging to the fabric of society as a whole." -- Thomas Sowell..
Activism can be good, but only if the cause is good and the way you exercise that activism is not harming/ annoying/ endangering the people you want to get on your side
Yeah, they are bored kids who just want some goal in their life. You very rarely see 30+ people doing this. Unfortunatelly for them they choosed to stop billion dollar bussiness...
Ah yes, to complain about oil let's go to a museum and try to vandalize a painting made a long while ago by a man who's been dead for more than a century. Brillaint.
They target these paintings, and other famous works of art, because they know they'll get attention when doing it, which in turn allows them to get their message out. If they targeted the trucks transporting the oil, no one would care, and it wouldn't make the news.
@@zephid11 You're describing the motive, but I want to add, trying to destroy culturally significant works of art is counter-productive, because majority of people aren't behind an idea of destroying culturally significant past for the future. For many, it's the foundation, and in some aspects, ultimately, art has enabled freedom of expression they're so whelmingly exercising.
Agree. They should just turn off the lights and leave for the night after turning on a camera for everyone to watch them as they realize what they've done.
@TukikoTroy they still damaged the frame, which is original. Also the whole glass excuse doesn't say much, because they still tried to damage the painting. Its like if someone tried to shoot you with a shotgun, but it malfunctions and doesn't shoot you when they pull the trigger. Would you then exempt them of any wrongdoing? No, they would still get arrested for attempted murder.
@@AceofSpades-6728 Sorry no. They didn't try to damage the painting at all. Everybody knows these paintings are very well protected in hermetically sealed cases. The 'attack' on stone henge, it wasn't paint it was a powder that washed of in the first shower of rain. These people know what they are doing. So... no damage, no 'attempted murder' just lots and lots of lovely publicity.
Consider that infant mortality was as high as 60% before oil, and it's dropped to less than 1% today. Those Just Stop OIl are not a joke, they are baby murderers.
Just stop oil is literally funded by oil companies to make activists look like complete morons and thus dismantle the Anti-oil argument Also there are these rich kids that like being famous for 15 minutes who do shit like this
I'll never understand activists who think trying to destroy historical art pieces is somehow going to help their cause, if anything it actively hurts it.
@@thequackashow619 And they actively hindered their own goals. Either by turning people against their cause instead of garnering support for it, or just getting themselves thrown in jail and wasting time that could've been spent doing something productive for the cause.
Why do they never, ever look normal? It's always colored hair, bowl cuts, mullets, shaved heads, black combat boots, nose piercings. They have a *look*
I think you are entirely missing the point on the archetype of people who do these things. It is iconoclasm at its finest. funny enough. TONS of artists, curators and art people came out to support the original two who attempted to destroy the first van gogh. They loved the idea that someone stood for something in a shocking way (which is often what artists want). Art typically has the motive of change and resistance behind it. Also what do you mean by normal? you sound super close-minded by saying that.
"2 years for throwing soup" Throwing soup isnt a crime. They got 2 years for vandalizing a historical artifact. and we can only hope Big Linda and Big Rochelle in the showers, are art lovers
You are aware it costs around $100,000 a year to put someone in prison? Even if you have no empathy for some clearly mentally ill young kids, is the vengence worth half a million of taxpayers money? (remember the painting itself wasn't damaged only the frame)
Interesting Fact: Van Gogh died in extreme poverty. He actually died after an attempted suicide in which he shot himself in the abdomen, convinced he was a failure at art.
The orange paint brigade does some pretty over the top stuff, but this attempted destruction of historical art almost feels like the taliban bombing statues of the buddha. Destroying historic art for the sake of a message, I couldn’t think of a more potent way to turn me off about that message, straight to jail.
@@iverbrnstad791 the intention is also what matters, besides there WAS serious damage. They damaged the original frame of the painting. So they did damage to a priceless historical artifact. Besides to attempt to destroy a peoples art and history is a VERY serious crime. I'd prefer my people's art to not be damaged on account of political activism. I think by now the group should be labeled as terrorists. Because they are intentionally seeking to harm nations with a political motive in mind.
Reminds me of Balaam and his ass. I'm paraphrasing here but the angel said to him. "Stop beating that donkey and thank him. That donkey saved your life, because he knew if he would have kept walking down this road, I would have taken out my sword, and killed you, Balaam, and I would have spared that donkey you ride on."
After a while, one might start to think that's the whole point. Get a bunch of rich kids who desperately want to be part of some historical movement to commit crimes in the name of some cause that's hurting your business. You make sure they have camera crews and plenty of journalists willing to cover their "Activism" so it always makes headlines.
@@RWhite_ alright but the real world where the rest of us genuinely don't care what some oil tycoon's son did on his tuesday brunch will still continue to purchase what we need to purchase to go about our daily lives. Like if you genuinely get influenced by someone who's train of thought is "how do we stop oil consumption.. oh I KNOW throw SOUP at a PAINTING".... then you deserve whatever stupidity heads your way, you know?
@@austincavalier1760 I believe you sorely misunderstood my comment. The point of this advocacy is not to convince anyone to stop using oil or anything like that, it's to poison the well so that all such advocacy gets painted with the same poisoned brush. They get people who want to feel like they a difference, but are too isolated from consequences to understand what they're actually doing.
They all have a distinctive look, how commonly those exact people are the ones leading charge behind this wild crap. It's like what MadMax would see in a fever dream.
????? you do know the oil used for energy and the oil used in personal products are vastly different things right? even if they were putting gasoline in their hair, it wouldn't be getting burned.
Erm... Tattoo inks are water based and have been for many years..... And the oil in hair products is veg oil... But like those idiots you dont seem to have the facts.
@calibursatsujin3112 Cause hair dye just falls off of trees? Oil is used in the production of everything, the factory that made the dye uses oil to heat it. Or the utility company that provides electricity to that factory uses oil to produce that power. Vehicles use fuel to ship it. plus hair dye will come in a package more than likely plastic once again oil.
@calibursatsujin3112 Being a hypocrite is the problem. Using oil based products but insisting the world stop production is a problem. Destroying property to get her way is a problem. Especially considering she is clueless on how to substitute oil.
If i were witnessing that, I wouldn't be able to control myself, if you're destroying culture you're rejecting humanity and don't deserve any protection humanity gives
@@jackbubby3893 It's both the representation of what it is and also who knows if it actually covers it completely. In this case the Original Frame was ruined, which while not as bad as the painting itself was still a huge chunk of cash and kinda rare on it's own even disconnected from the painting given it's from 1600s. Also sure sounded like the crowd wasn't sure if it was protected. Honestly if someone actually loves art / likes the artist this kind of spitting in their face would naturally warrant a... heated reaction.
@@Orrissan These paintings are completely isolated, it's not even breakable glass. Nobody here even cares about those paintings, just pretending to care.
Yep no crime should be more severe then intentionally destroying priceless original works we can never remake. Destroying history is a crime where the entire world is a victim. If it was an accident 3 years might be alright but when you Intend to destroy 200 year old painting... they didn't get enough should have been 25 years or 30 repeats are unacceptable.
@@jackbubby3893 i deeply care about art and the respect that such historical paintings possess. The value of art is subjective but art can invoke feelings and are timeless enjoyments for people who see value in them. For some art fanatics, the attempt at destroying these paintings is akin to assassinating Keanu Reeves. Some people pretend to care but not all of them do. And not all of them know that the art is protected by glass.
Why, they're not saying "just stop food". /s All kidding aside; that is also another thing these things want. They *hate* industrialized food production keeping so many people alive. Look up "golden rice", and see what the eco-loons did to that scientific breakthrough. They have the money; the power, and the social influence... They'd very much like to keep it that way too. These "activists" can't enjoy their yachts and trust funds fully, with all us poors around. They want to redistribute wealth; as long as it's somebody else's.
Ion know about that one chief. food would just mean some of those starving humans dies while oil might make the earth uninhabitable in the long run. Wasting food is still dumb af but ion think it holds up to the consequences of drilling oil and stuff
@@mattpet7913 And yet here you are on either a computer or mobile device that was created using materials dug out of the earth and likely powered by a combination of fossil fuels. Doesn't seem like your convictions are as strong as your opinions...
@@BowlCrossy I never said my convictions were that we should stop drilling oil right now. A report was already shared that this is not possible atm with the current energy network. I'm a cancer researcher by profession I use incredible amounts of plastics which are made from oil and even directly use oil in certain micrcscopic assays. All I was saying was that the original comment is a stupid comparison. Just because u have certain world view and a perceived enemy doesn't mean u should start seeing that enemy in anyone who u disagree with.
as someone with dyed hair, it's disgraceful honestly. instead of doing it because it's a colour that suits or a proper reflection on how you're feeling, these people just do it so more people look at them. that's all it is.
Wearing most likely a polyester top and clothes which would not exist without crude oil residue. Two of them wearing glasses made with plastic frames made from crude oil residue. Carrying a plastic coffee cup, and with carry bags most likely again made from polyester. Staying indoors is a good idea nowadays... Crazy fuckers everywhere.
I don’t know if any group has done more harm to a cause than these people. They are masters of making people want nothing to do with what they stand for.
i know right! they are so absolutely terrible and hatred inducing, I genuinely started to consider if the whole Just Stop Oil thing wasn't just some sort of 5D chess psy-op by "Big Oil" to discredit environmentalists in general by making people think they are all like these idiots.
Pardon me, but how is it terrorism? It's vandalism, not terrorism. Please don't make words meaningless by misusing bad words for shock value, like the far-left already does.
@@wuuwbduiqwgbdI apologize I know how intimidation can work outside of murder and physical violence..you know like destroying a priceless form of property plus I can see things outside my personal viewpoint…That’s my bad I’m not that simple.
Oh those paintings aren’t worth a single million. That first on alone is worth 83,7 million. They couldn’t pay this. Litteraly selling everything they owned couldn’t even get them close
How to stop oil:
1. Make everyone hate you
2. ???
3. Enjoy jail
It got me thinking about using more or less oil. But I don't bother to change my behavior. Almost every product or service I use, uses oil someway or another
Just stop oil has to be funded and organised by the oil companies to get people to hate the climate movement.
How to stop oil: Try to destroy famous artwork. Makes perfect sense
@@trevorharris400 jail time😂
4. Rock a dirty mullet
Nothing screams "support our cause," like vandalizing something monumental or historical. Just the way MLK envisioned.
We HAVE to be in an alternate timeline where his speech was "I Had A Nightmare" instead of "I Have A Dream"
seriously
financed by the owner of the oil company. 2 + 2 = ?
@@staskozak8118 Its his daughter, but you knew that.
They don't care about the cause they protest nor that they'll antagonise people against their cause by their behaviour.
All they care are pats on the back from fellow grifters and supposed activists. Literally all the want is recognition and clout. That's it.
Ah yes, Van Gogh, the famous oil tycoon. That's why they go after his paintings, right?
They are indeed *oil paintings.*
@@twunt2000 lol
@@twunt2000 It's absolute pain to be uncertain on whether THAT might have been their ACTUAL thought process. Like, the most sane assumption would be that they're reverse shills paid by some oil company to make activists look bad. But apparently we're in a timeline where it's always the most insane assumption to turn out as the correct one.
@@twunt2000beat me to it 😂
@@twunt2000good one
1:05 the guy's absolutely right
Van Gogh didn't see his own success in his own life, and died due to his poverty, depression/poor mental health, so I've got a particular soft spot for him and for the works he left behind. Generally, people who don't even like art, tend to admit his paintings in particular are pretty amazing.
That one Doctor Who episode about Van Gogh affected me a lot, watching this saddens me
Thing is though that it would be just as bad if they threw soup at somebody's Hello Kitty poster: it's not theirs, they have no right to try to wreck it, and they achieved nothing but looking like a bunch of dipshits (and, hopefully, getting significant fines and some actual jail time).
the fact that they did to van goghs work makes me extra sad.
life wasnt kind to him but he was kind to the world even till his last breathe
@@jic1 Don't be silly, it would not be 'just as bad' if this were a mass-produced Hello Kitty poster.
Double down on these protesters by saying, "Actually it looks better now."
This isn't a form of protesting. This is a form of vandalism. No one is going to support the cause of someone who attempts to destroy rather than build. It's as simple as that.
There are makers and there are takers. Follow the makers, ditch the takers. 🙃
That's the point. You can't convince me this isn't a psyop, because this group only ever does this kind of shit. It's not about making change, it's about making front-page news.
There are people who support leftism so I believe there will always be people supporting those who only seek to destroy and not build anything, that being said it's actually a win win situation and technically a good thing in the long run that they're doing this because the more they destroy what normies love the more normies will side with us however it's true that this has a completely opposite effect from what is intended
Its actually a form of propaganda thats designed to enable these oil companies. The executives that want too keep oil flowing completely understand your reasoning and are exploiting it.
All they do is pay large sums of money to desperate poor people and the mentally unwell. They tell them to act unhinged for a good cause. Record and publicize said craziness they had a hand in. Then boom the general public associates environmental activism with these idiots.
You are the target audience and the people with investments in oil production successfully manipulated you.
You are right, they are not activist, only vandals!
a prime example of people who never been punched
one of Iron Mike's best comments.
@@shandorunia “I could feel his muscle tissues collapse under my force. It’s ludicrous these mortals even attempt to enter my realm”
Idk, that dude's barely holding his jaw up XD
Hopefully that will change in prison
They’re being paid
I still cannot believe the normal patrons allowed this without immediate and extreme consequences.
Cucks and simps. The entire EU (with a couple notable exceptions) has been disarmed, emasculated, and rendered helpless. Once proud nations have all bent the knee. 😢
I was thinking the same thing, but it wouldn't be worth going to jail for assault because of these types of people
society is absolutely cuckolded. it cannot police itself. it is dying.
My wild guess is they were afraid of the insane people hurting them if they tried to stop it.
Also wondering if oil companies are secretly supporting these morons so any anti-oil activist can be lumped in with these nutjobs.
the patrons aren't brown, so it's pretty believable that they would use the rule of law instead of savagery.
If they want to stop oil, why don't they go try that shit in Saudi Arabia?
Or China...
lol they wouldn’t make it out the airport tbh
I swear the "just stop oil" movement is paid by the actual oil companies who want to make people who speak against oil look ridiculous in the future. Because acting like this is completely moronic in the most literal way possible.
usa makes more oil so that makes no sense
@@MaxG-jk8tyCause they would never be seen aga...Oooh, gotcha.
Just so you all know, Phoebe (pink hair) grew up wealthy in a £4m Chelsea townhouse and went to a £45,000 a year private school. I know a few of these activists, they are often from super privileged backgrounds and won't have to worry about jail affecting their prospects
That actually explains a lot, just in general too probably somewhat with activist like people and woke mob etc.
Typical Champagne Socialist- they think that the louder they squawk, the more virtuous it makes them....
This means she's not mentally prepared for what happens in jail 😂
In so many words you have essentially said these people are suffering from privilege guilt and are easily swayed. I may have an investment opportunity in their futures!
Should have been 5yea4s
Anyone else notice how people who talk about "The right side of history" are ALWAYS on the WRONG side?!
Gotta find some way to cope with their objectively wrong behavior
Oy vey! Stop noticing things!
it is just like how classic cartoon villains claim they are the rightful rulers of the world
Hopefully in a few years these people will just be remembered as lunatics, cause otherwise we are doomed.
its called projection. Blame everyone else for what you your self are very guilty of. Its the sign of a Democrat these days...
"Seek and ye shall find" - Soap MacTavish
I'm so sick of "right side of history." It's beyond arrogance.
they have a short sighted view and are dumb and arrogant to think they are righteous and anything they do is justified as long as its for their cause - like most tyrants in history. they don't understand that their desired out come would result in mass starvation. yes, we need alternative energy sources - no we can't just "stop oil" today.
It just means "we think we'll win".
Main character syndrome is a bitch for teens with an identity crisis
A claim shared by them, and most genocidal tyrants.
Ah yes, the "right side of history" types.
The types who don't have any intellectual value. They just want to be on the side they think will "win". Because then they can feel good about themselves.
They destroyed the frame. The painting was protected by glass but not the frame. An it was 13000£ to repair as it was original.
ow
Damn that’s a lot of money.
@@happi_galaxy5147 the frame is from the 1600s, its expensive on its own even is nowhere close to the value of the painting
how does soup destroy a frame? just clean it
@@Samtheman91 ..
1. Arrested.
2. Charged.
3. Fined & Jailed.
4. Made to pay for damages.
Give them 3 years hard labor and they will truly understand Van Gogh’s suffering.
What about losing a ear ? 🤔😬🙄
@@rhettcorbett3346lol yeah if not turn on the subtitle
Bro they're super wealthy it doesn't matter to them
Actually them being in jail will save the environment from 2 cars.
As far as I'm aware they actually did do damage with the soup to the frame which was also antique and liable for part of their sentence to jail.
How the F did she manage to dye her hair pink without petroleum based chemicals?
You're trying to expect logic from illogicals
By lacking enough braincells to understand the hypocrisy if it,
@@ivenstorm which comes in a package made from foil which needs it as well as printed with ink that contains, wearing clothes that required it... I could go on but they can't be taught.
@@ivenstorm I doubt she went through the effort. She probably even drove to the art gallery.
@@user-xv9kb2vs5f her parents chauffeur did.
Did they target the Van Gogh pieces because they are OIL PAINTINGS?
I said that sarcastically as a joke, but now I've typed it, it kinda sounds like the dumbass justification these guys would use
They already blocked trucks transporting cooking oil. You think you're joking, but they're not joking.
pretty sure that's the exact reason, yeah
9/10 joke made me smirk.
almost like people forget the natural existence of oil in it's non-synthetic form... Nah, plastic pops into existence the moment man wills it. That's what those fb posts tell me!
@@dkosmari when i saw that news i laugh so hard
The soup they threw is more valuable than the 2-3 years of the lives they threw.
😂😂😂
Their methodology works. I watched what they did and decided to bury my car and move into an igloo.
Throwing soup ❌
Vandalism ✅
Judge not the color of a person skin, but judge them by the color of their hair - Ghandi 2077
Especially if it's a colour that never occurs in nature.
Based Gandhi.
Or the colour of their paint, rofl
😂
Lmao
they all look like kotaku journalists lmao
looks like sweet baby inc squad😂
They got brainwashed by the same ideology, which apparently has the same clothes and makeup store
"That side" always look a certain way, huh
That protein deficient vegan dude on the right does not look like he's gonna do well in prison.
looool facts.
0:14 Of all the versions of the mullet she could have gone with she chose the mental ward version.
She went classic Die Antwoord insane
I think the mental ward chose her.
I mean her and the guy next to her looked like they escaped a mental institution. Probably still wearing the nice jackets before they walked into that museum.
Omagaaad, i mean, what is she?
Stop 😂
Punishment for exceptionally terrible vandalism and blocking national roads while harassing motorists should be a minimum of 5 years.
Social media made y'all way too comfortable with disrespecting people and not getting punched in the face for it.-Mike Tyson
Yeah true, that's why I say on the internet the same thing I'd say in real life cause too many people are comfortable saying whatever they want and it's just kinda annoying
I remembering watching an interview where the host disrespected Tyson. Tyson did not take it well calling the host a slur of names that were deserved. It got very uncomfortable quickly, just watching it. If Tyson were to go off, the host truly did not have an idea what Tyson could do to him. If he was lucky, Tyson with one blow would have killed him. If Tyson would have been controlled, in his rage, he would of dropped his IQ down to 1... PERMANENTLY. I doubt that anyone would have wanted to intervene. Even at 58, in his current shape, he would decimate 99.9999% of the populace into vegetables. So many sparring partners and fighters have said the first few blows, from Tyson, they knew it was over.
@@ErwinSchrodinger64 Then Tyson would get SUED SUED SUED for all hes worth. One might be able to punch the other in the face out of anger but that anger has legal consequences too.
Mike Tyson lost his fortune- around 300million dollars from all his legal lawsuits and it cost him almost everything he earned.
Not sure this is the moral story you think it is... 'Have enough money, you can lose it all to punch people who make you mad because you cant control your anger.' is a pretty poor way to say "Its over Anakin, I have the high ground."
Wrong use of quote, but i get the gist of what youre trying to say
And they said the games will make boys a psychopaths. How the turntables...
These sorts of protests make me ignore whatever they're trying to get attention to. Very counterproductive IMO
make asylums great again
These people are trying the ‘shotgun approach’. Just start shit anywhere, it doesn’t even have to be slightly related to their cause.
Like the people blocking vegetable oil trucks… They themselves don’t even know what they are doing anymore.
Edit: I also notice she wore some sunglasses. I sure hope that plastic doesn’t have oil products in there.
At this point I don't think their real goal is to raise awareness about climate change or whatever. I think they are just being paid to stir sh*t up but I don't know by whom.
In fact, might actually make me NOT be on your side if it was something I was neutral about before. I'm petty like that.
thats the oil companies plan, to make you hate protest
those activists have phones, clothes and shoes all made from oil. lol
The hypocrisy of all eco terrorists
I don’t support their actions in the slightest but this comment is so fucking dumb… half of people who comment on asmongold videos should be finishing high school instead of watching yt
and leather belt for sure
I'm increasingly inclined to believe that these people were actually fake environmental activists hired by the oil companies themselves to pose as such and make the whole climate activism look bad.
Or they're just shit for brains. They sure act like it.
@@carlosmiraballes9192 4 str, 4 stam
Van Gogh’s life was marked by unimaginable struggles and heartbreak. He battled severe mental health issues, poverty, and rejection throughout his life. Despite creating some of the most iconic art in history, he sold only one painting while alive and lived in constant despair. His relationship with society was brutal-he was misunderstood, mocked, and even institutionalized. The tragedy of his life culminated in his suicide at 37 where he shot himself in the gut, leaving behind a legacy he never got to see celebrated. Damaging his work disrespects the resilience and pain behind each stroke of his brush. It’s a cruel reminder of the brutality he already endured
"Future generations will see us as being on the right side of history."
No, they're going to remember you as a a bunch of dumbasses who think that crime is an acceptable means to justify the end.
civil rights movement, women's rights, general voting rights all used disruptive demonstrations and vandalism to garner attention. Historically you're the ones people look back on poorly.
Not really. They won't be remembered at all.
@richw500 the point is philosophical tough, we care about the safety for the piece of art, but the reasoning behind is this. If the world ends, so does the painting that you so likely want to defend. Let's raise awareness about this subject, creating controversy. Here just to explain and nothing else. Remember that company have better PR teams than those activists. Have a nice day.
We won't have future generations thanks to them
@@Aurius.Strangeyou're a moron. I care my private property and will defend it too. That doesn't mean I don't care about the earth.
Climate panic isn't really about the climate it's for more control over people.
0:11 idk why it's so hilarious to me the way the camera pans over and the grandma is in the back ruining the other painting but no one sees it lmao
lol I would NOT have noticed that if you hadn't pointed it out!
I didn’t notice until I went back!
YOOOO SHE SOUPING TOO
Why do these people always look the same?
The funny thing in my country is, they even are the same. That group is not as big and/or supported as our shilling press claims.
Plants, false flags, crisis actors, sleeper cells....whatever you want to call them😊
Communism 😂 There isn't much merit there.
It's part of their identitiy. They want to show everyone how special they are.
They're brainwashed to think they look "diverse" by doing that
People that were sheltered their entire lives and thought life's always sunshine and rainbows
If you see a snake and a pink hair, pick the snake up and run away from the pink hair
Yea, save the snake from the dangerous animal
Heck yeah!
after spending my last 2 weeks playing Space Marine 2, I have a few ideas on what to do with that snake
Would you rather be in the art gallery with a snake or a pink hair?
'Right side of history" Lol, these people are really legends in their own minds.
They're essentially Rosa Parks
@@Deeptunester don't compare these clowns to Rosa Parks.
@@cannedend8915 Having to put a /s really ruins the point of sarcasm in the first place
idk wo that is
@@r30413 I hope you're not American
Her dyed hair has oil......
the i know very little about the topic response
@@dzilo Oil doesn't just come from petroleum
You don't fry your chicken in motor oil
@boocackeedquackhead8454 it got your attention though didnt it? Yet you've made a conscious decision to be upset over a painting that wasn't damaged. LOL.
Yes, we don't fry chicken in motor oil ...but Petroleum products & derivatives turn up in a surprising amount of places.
"Most hair dyes on the market belong to a class called coal-tar. The term coal-tar colors dates to the time when coloring materials were byproducts of the coal industry, though most are now made from petroleum".
@boocackeedquackhead8454 it appears it's you with infantile brain who doesn't actually know what just stops oils aims are either. LOL.
Committing a crime makes us repulse in what you’re fighting for
One of the reasons the sentences are ´high´ is because there was a real chance they would have damaged the painting. There is glass covering the painting, but according to the judge ruling there was a real chance the soup would have seaped into the list and damaged the painting beyond repair.
I have no words for the stupidity of these people, this doesn´t help their cause at all.
This is felony vandalism. The value of the painting is literally priceless too. So delicious watching these people screw themselves over and fail to damage the painting.
Why did everyone stand around and watch them do it?
@@XD-cr3du no, it does not help their cause which is why it’s safe to say they are all industry plants. Which is why you’ll never see these people criticize Saudi Arabia
@@alphagt62 Because they wanna post it online for clout, and you can't get that by stopping them.
@@joshuaamado559 not priceless. But I think the price is in the hundreds of millions now, so as far as we paupers are concerned yeah, it might as well be priceless.
it's funny how they look like exactly how you expect them to look like.
Arent they all?
they'd all get top jobs at the BBC
This is what Sweet Baby Inc employees are doing now? Makes sense
Yup
Timeline wise, this is what they did before.
Don't be dissin my Sweet Baby Rays now.
Rich kids cosplaying as revolutionaries, acting out in a museum so that daddy will notice them.
Remember when they did this to Stonehenge?
Add in a Les Misérables production?
SO it was the same fuckers!
What happened to those ppl?
Man it pissed me off the only person who really tried to stop them was a single japanese woman
@@88Cbtthey got arrested and taught (said info likely went in through one ear and put the other) that the washable paint they used is harmful to and does not come off of the lichien that cover the monument
The kind of people with the arrogance to preemptively declare themselves "on the right side of history" almost always turn out to be on the wrong side in the end.
They'll just be forgotten and not part of any history.
just like communists did
Even if I agreed with their stance I would think they were on the wrong side of history because they're actively harming their cause with their actions. They make me wanna take my car for a drive to no where in particular just to spite them. It's not even like their cause is something that needs 'awareness' brought to it by any means necessary because we've been hearing about the looming energy crisis since before any of those people were born.
@Agent-mb1xx They are communists.
0:36 but it’s not like they would have stopped if it wasn’t behind glass, they’d still throw soup.
No they wouldn't. You obviously don't listen to any of their interviews. They make sure the paintings are protected beforehand.
@@thinkhector Yes, of course, but it's not because they care about the art, but because they know they would go to jail for a really long time if they actually destroyed a famous painting.
@@thinkhector Isn’t this the same group of people that was trying to deface statues or monuments or something a couple years ago? And you want me to believe they didn’t mean any harm
Not only that even if you’re right, they’re still vandalizing property, negatively impacting a business and impacting people at an event who probably had to pay to be there. I don’t have any respect for this subhuman garbage and I don’t believe any of their claims that care about anything but “their cause” which I also don’t think they care about, they just want to be virtuous crusaders that can pat themselves on the back
@@zephid11 That would be fair is that was there intention, but they have been interviewed several times. They always go beforehand and make sure the paintings is protected by glass. And they have instructions to not proceed if it is not. They actually have no intention of causing damage.
Think about it. They have done this more than a dozen times. If they really wanted to do damaged don't you think they use a hammer or saw and not soup? The news told you how to feel about it, and you swallowed it hook, line, sinker.
@@thinkhector Bzzt, wrong. They intended to destroy, the fact they are incompetent should change nothing in terms of punishment.
Paintings fine. But if they had their way it wouldn't be. They should be punished and fined as if they had destroyed it as that was their goal.
Then saying they don't actually want to destroy the thing they attack is an excuse given after the fact to cover their asses. And you believed them, hook, line and sinker.
Why do you trust these people any more than you do the news? Why are you excusing their behaviour as if it is acceptable?
"just stop oil" While wearing clothing that oil helped make.
While throwing soup that oil helped make.
I bet they got there by some sort of transportation that used oil.
Solid 10/10 they played themselves
bunch of spoilt little rich kids who have no understanding of what they are trying to stand up for.
I doubt these ones are rich kids. Most of them seem like the freaks of school, old ladies and all the dues are older men. Something I noticed with them a while back. And then compounded when I watched them do what they did at Stonehenge.
Rich kids won't do something they know they'll go to jail for. They'd only do it in large crowds like Antifa or Palestine riots where they can wear masks.
Employees of the oil industry trying to make critics of the oil industry look like morons. Stop Oil, XR, and all these do-nothings are controlled opposition.
@@nolan_8 I would rather sit at home all day and smugly judge the world than actively vandalize property and make life worse for others. That way at least I'm not a net negative like those idiots who got jail time.
@@nolan_8 Perhaps they are doing something, but all they are doing and accomplishing is angering the people they are claiming to be trying to help. I would prefer them to be at home all day rather than intentionally making other people's lives miserable under the guise of trying to save the world.
@@nolan_8 you're a pro(re)gressive cultist just like these "activists" on the video, same side.
These people care enough to do something, just not enough to clean their room or literally groom themselves to not look like a Beetlejuice.
I'm glad actions still have consequences.
Not nearly as often as they should have, but I do agree with you. We need to bring back shame and consequences in a big fucking way.
not if your rich enough
Made me feel better a little but the timeline is still fkd
Consequences need to be harsher
not in France, you can do anything without repercutions and it's getting out of hands
'member when Van Gogh was making oil rigs all over the world, those were the times
Sounds like a cool althistory story.
I loved it when Van Gogh said, "It's drilling time!" and drilled all over the place.
@@TheLurker1647 🤣😅
Van Gogh founded Exxon...or something.
Kek
Van Gogh painting an oil rig as an art piece would provide more value to humanity than all of these oilstop simps combined would ever be able to.
I’m more shocked that someone pre planned for a soup attack with an enclosed frame 😂😂
"Activism is a way for useless people to feel important, even if the consequences of their activism are counterproductive for those they claim to be helping and damaging to the fabric of society as a whole." -- Thomas Sowell..
"[They use activism] as an excuse to express their own hostility and frustrated need for power." - Theodore Kaczynski
Yup
Activism is for some an outlet for their narcissism
@@akosv96 wait, did he really say that?
Activism can be good, but only if the cause is good and the way you exercise that activism is not harming/ annoying/ endangering the people you want to get on your side
"The only thing they destroyed is their lives" . . . . But I say "What lives?"
Exactly. People with happy lives don't take part in this madness, these are miserable people who have nothing better in their lives.
The souping man seems to have some evidence of domestic ab*se on his face😗
Yeah, they are bored kids who just want some goal in their life. You very rarely see 30+ people doing this. Unfortunatelly for them they choosed to stop billion dollar bussiness...
Ah yes, to complain about oil let's go to a museum and try to vandalize a painting made a long while ago by a man who's been dead for more than a century.
Brillaint.
They target these paintings, and other famous works of art, because they know they'll get attention when doing it, which in turn allows them to get their message out. If they targeted the trucks transporting the oil, no one would care, and it wouldn't make the news.
☝️
@@zephid11 Fair when it comes to trying to harness attention but rather uninspired when it comes to actually sending the message with any impact.
It was a Oil Painting!!! /s
@@zephid11 You're describing the motive, but I want to add, trying to destroy culturally significant works of art is counter-productive, because majority of people aren't behind an idea of destroying culturally significant past for the future. For many, it's the foundation, and in some aspects, ultimately, art has enabled freedom of expression they're so whelmingly exercising.
SOOOOO GLAD the painting had a glass panel! God that freaked me out! 😭😂
"What are you in here for?"
"I souped a Van Gough."
3 prisoners plus the guard beat them up
They better pray that they don't meet an Austrian Painter in there 😏
@@beastmaster6943Being dutch myself I don't get the joke....
Also to the OP it's Van Gogh.
sounds like something straight out of seinfeld
"You don't soup a van Gogh, Jerry! You don't soup a van Gogh!"
@@dankfarrik8376 Adolf H
Any fool that superglues their hand to the lenolium-floor, deserves to stay there for 2 days ...🤨
And get p'ssed on
now they can superglue themselves to the jail cell they'll be in
Agree. They should just turn off the lights and leave for the night after turning on a camera for everyone to watch them as they realize what they've done.
Porsche Museum style imprisonment
I'll see your 2 days and raise you 3 more!
Van Goghs work is of such global import that it transcends his Dutch culture. This is a world treasure . This belongs to the world and is barbarism.
Erm, the painting wasn't even touched because it is well protected.
@TukikoTroy they still damaged the frame, which is original.
Also the whole glass excuse doesn't say much, because they still tried to damage the painting.
Its like if someone tried to shoot you with a shotgun, but it malfunctions and doesn't shoot you when they pull the trigger. Would you then exempt them of any wrongdoing? No, they would still get arrested for attempted murder.
@@AceofSpades-6728 Sorry no. They didn't try to damage the painting at all. Everybody knows these paintings are very well protected in hermetically sealed cases. The 'attack' on stone henge, it wasn't paint it was a powder that washed of in the first shower of rain. These people know what they are doing. So... no damage, no 'attempted murder' just lots and lots of lovely publicity.
@@TukikoTroy Its the symbol not the fact that there is glass
@@TukikoTroybut still, they're tempering with historical artifacts and disturbing the public. It ensues jail time
That is why EVERY piece of art needs to be encased.
the whole organization just seems like some stupid south park plot 😭😭
Consider that infant mortality was as high as 60% before oil, and it's dropped to less than 1% today.
Those Just Stop OIl are not a joke, they are baby murderers.
George Soros is paying them to be a nuisance.
Eric Cartman’s silly hate crime (on oil paintings)
Makes you think about how much in South Park is satire, sadly enough
Just stop oil is literally funded by oil companies to make activists look like complete morons and thus dismantle the Anti-oil argument
Also there are these rich kids that like being famous for 15 minutes who do shit like this
Vincent never hurt anyone.
He hurt himself pretty substantially.
I hEAR ya! 😂
Van Gogh’s ear: “Am I a joke to you?”
Vincent's ear begs to differ!
ear ear
wow, these people don't learn.
"guys"
"wow"
This guy are sick
This guys man
these*
This warms my heart. I hope they learn a valuable lesson.
1:10 Can we take a moment to look at the dude in the middle?
😂
Literally 🫤
I am usually not violent but doesn't that guys face scream "beat me to death?"
@@chrisschwarzinger2561 nope
He's lower than that
probably had a stroke before
I'll never understand activists who think trying to destroy historical art pieces is somehow going to help their cause, if anything it actively hurts it.
Its coz they se other ppl doing it, and are like... "thats so cool, i wanna do that too".
;D
They do it for clout and pats on the back among their peers, not some "cause".
@Steir12 there goal was to stop the expansion of the North Sea Oil fields
@@thequackashow619 And they actively hindered their own goals. Either by turning people against their cause instead of garnering support for it, or just getting themselves thrown in jail and wasting time that could've been spent doing something productive for the cause.
How?
Why do they never, ever look normal? It's always colored hair, bowl cuts, mullets, shaved heads, black combat boots, nose piercings. They have a *look*
In other news, grass is green and the sky is still blue.
It's about attention. It's always been about attention.
Because they want to be different and not conform by looking the same and conforming.
They’re defeating the patriarchy that way.
I think you are entirely missing the point on the archetype of people who do these things. It is iconoclasm at its finest. funny enough. TONS of artists, curators and art people came out to support the original two who attempted to destroy the first van gogh. They loved the idea that someone stood for something in a shocking way (which is often what artists want). Art typically has the motive of change and resistance behind it. Also what do you mean by normal? you sound super close-minded by saying that.
I would give them 10 years. This was a crime against humanity.
"2 years for throwing soup"
Throwing soup isnt a crime.
They got 2 years for vandalizing a historical artifact.
and we can only hope Big Linda and Big Rochelle in the showers, are art lovers
they got 2 years for doing 13k British pounds worth of damage
*historical
@@Grassdia you can obviously tell that was a typo... if you look at the keyboard, the "a" and "s" keys are next to each other
@@Dustpetro what no way I’m just letting them know so that they could if they want correct it. Thanks for stating the obvious though 😉
Don't forget Big Nancy, whose name before going to prison was Steven.
Holy crap! British justice system actually delivering some justice? This is one of a life time event!
I'm not the only one shocked then?
@@HappyCynic Make that three.
eh, still more effective than the american justice system
@@VOLDGAMER1no it isn't. Our "justice" system is a joke
The Dutch would have lost their shit if there was nothing handed down.
As is, this is what I would consider the bare minimum.
2 years?? that's ridiculous!
it should be 10 years
You are aware it costs around $100,000 a year to put someone in prison?
Even if you have no empathy for some clearly mentally ill young kids, is the vengence worth half a million of taxpayers money? (remember the painting itself wasn't damaged only the frame)
@@theqaz1828jail for the intent, not the result. Taxpayers pay the same shit regardless of the amount of people in jail
2 years is enough because she is likely getting her ass handed to her since her parents obviously didn’t raise her right.
@@AdulAhmad68 this is why taxes are so high.......
So jail them longer than actual rapists and robbers?
Sunflowers is my favourite painting by Vincent Van Gogh. The painting symbolizes gratitude...
Interesting Fact: Van Gogh died in extreme poverty. He actually died after an attempted suicide in which he shot himself in the abdomen, convinced he was a failure at art.
Don’t forget that he cut his ear off and gave it to his crush professing his love to her.
This makes me want to become an oil conglomerate
The kind that provides the most environmental damage too
The orange paint brigade does some pretty over the top stuff, but this attempted destruction of historical art almost feels like the taliban bombing statues of the buddha. Destroying historic art for the sake of a message, I couldn’t think of a more potent way to turn me off about that message, straight to jail.
No one attempted to stop them. What a pathetic spineless crowd just gawking with cell phones in hand, unwilling to take action
This is not enough punishment
They should also have to pay 10% the value of the pieces. It it actually got damaged, 100%
It’s extremely harsh by Uk standards
Two years is a significant punishment, especially given there was no serious damage.
@@iverbrnstad791 the intention is also what matters, besides there WAS serious damage. They damaged the original frame of the painting. So they did damage to a priceless historical artifact. Besides to attempt to destroy a peoples art and history is a VERY serious crime. I'd prefer my people's art to not be damaged on account of political activism. I think by now the group should be labeled as terrorists. Because they are intentionally seeking to harm nations with a political motive in mind.
@@dittodemo123 Nothing was damaged, you people are so dramatic. Stonehenge wasn't damaged either, it was washable paint.
It's going to get to the point where you have to go through security checkpoints to get inside the museums
Not a bad idea, actually. It would definitely stop most of this garbage.
its a great idea - seriously
Starts with soup ends with acid....
A man that understands how slippery slopes work....
I love the Beardy smug right at the end the best.
that soup was worth more then their lives.
easily
Soup Lives Matter!
and the cans were lined with plastic
Reminds me of Balaam and his ass. I'm paraphrasing here but the angel said to him.
"Stop beating that donkey and thank him. That donkey saved your life, because he knew if he would have kept walking down this road, I would have taken out my sword, and killed you, Balaam, and I would have spared that donkey you ride on."
"Stop oil" the more you do these -1000IQ things the more I want to use oil
After a while, one might start to think that's the whole point. Get a bunch of rich kids who desperately want to be part of some historical movement to commit crimes in the name of some cause that's hurting your business. You make sure they have camera crews and plenty of journalists willing to cover their "Activism" so it always makes headlines.
@@RWhite_ alright but the real world where the rest of us genuinely don't care what some oil tycoon's son did on his tuesday brunch will still continue to purchase what we need to purchase to go about our daily lives. Like if you genuinely get influenced by someone who's train of thought is "how do we stop oil consumption.. oh I KNOW throw SOUP at a PAINTING".... then you deserve whatever stupidity heads your way, you know?
@@austincavalier1760 I believe you sorely misunderstood my comment. The point of this advocacy is not to convince anyone to stop using oil or anything like that, it's to poison the well so that all such advocacy gets painted with the same poisoned brush.
They get people who want to feel like they a difference, but are too isolated from consequences to understand what they're actually doing.
This is the reason why wokeness is hated too....
@@JaneDark94 forcing allegiance on something your not into is worse rather live by the Third Reich instead if this is how's gonna go
They all have a distinctive look, how commonly those exact people are the ones leading charge behind this wild crap. It's like what MadMax would see in a fever dream.
intention goes a long way
Liberal Logic 101
- Hates Oil.
- Tattoos body and dyes hair with oil based products.
????? you do know the oil used for energy and the oil used in personal products are vastly different things right? even if they were putting gasoline in their hair, it wouldn't be getting burned.
Erm... Tattoo inks are water based and have been for many years..... And the oil in hair products is veg oil... But like those idiots you dont seem to have the facts.
@calibursatsujin3112 Cause hair dye just falls off of trees? Oil is used in the production of everything, the factory that made the dye uses oil to heat it. Or the utility company that provides electricity to that factory uses oil to produce that power. Vehicles use fuel to ship it. plus hair dye will come in a package more than likely plastic once again oil.
@@theo21021 and if hair dye didn’t exist those would still be true. Hair dye itself is not the problem
@calibursatsujin3112 Being a hypocrite is the problem. Using oil based products but insisting the world stop production is a problem. Destroying property to get her way is a problem. Especially considering she is clueless on how to substitute oil.
If i were witnessing that, I wouldn't be able to control myself, if you're destroying culture you're rejecting humanity and don't deserve any protection humanity gives
Bro it was just glass. Maybe you're the one who needs help.
@@jackbubby3893 It's both the representation of what it is and also who knows if it actually covers it completely. In this case the Original Frame was ruined, which while not as bad as the painting itself was still a huge chunk of cash and kinda rare on it's own even disconnected from the painting given it's from 1600s.
Also sure sounded like the crowd wasn't sure if it was protected. Honestly if someone actually loves art / likes the artist this kind of spitting in their face would naturally warrant a... heated reaction.
@@Orrissan These paintings are completely isolated, it's not even breakable glass. Nobody here even cares about those paintings, just pretending to care.
Yep no crime should be more severe then intentionally destroying priceless original works we can never remake. Destroying history is a crime where the entire world is a victim. If it was an accident 3 years might be alright but when you Intend to destroy 200 year old painting... they didn't get enough should have been 25 years or 30 repeats are unacceptable.
@@jackbubby3893 i deeply care about art and the respect that such historical paintings possess. The value of art is subjective but art can invoke feelings and are timeless enjoyments for people who see value in them. For some art fanatics, the attempt at destroying these paintings is akin to assassinating Keanu Reeves. Some people pretend to care but not all of them do. And not all of them know that the art is protected by glass.
the sun is hot. let's throw soup at priceless paintings.
monkey fling poo ooga booga me stwong me on big side of history ook ook
Three cheers for glass frame. The vandalizers probably knew too.
I can't describe the rage I felt watching this.. and then you mentioned it was covered with a glass case, and I just started laughing.
They destroyed the original frame, which was worth over $30,000.
"just stop oil" meanwhile you wasted your food, your energy, your time..
Wasting food on glass while saying stop using oil is pretty hypocritical.
Why, they're not saying "just stop food". /s
All kidding aside; that is also another thing these things want. They *hate* industrialized food production keeping so many people alive.
Look up "golden rice", and see what the eco-loons did to that scientific breakthrough. They have the money; the power, and the social influence...
They'd very much like to keep it that way too. These "activists" can't enjoy their yachts and trust funds fully, with all us poors around.
They want to redistribute wealth; as long as it's somebody else's.
Ion know about that one chief. food would just mean some of those starving humans dies while oil might make the earth uninhabitable in the long run. Wasting food is still dumb af but ion think it holds up to the consequences of drilling oil and stuff
@@mattpet7913 And yet here you are on either a computer or mobile device that was created using materials dug out of the earth and likely powered by a combination of fossil fuels. Doesn't seem like your convictions are as strong as your opinions...
@@BowlCrossy I never said my convictions were that we should stop drilling oil right now. A report was already shared that this is not possible atm with the current energy network. I'm a cancer researcher by profession I use incredible amounts of plastics which are made from oil and even directly use oil in certain micrcscopic assays. All I was saying was that the original comment is a stupid comparison.
Just because u have certain world view and a perceived enemy doesn't mean u should start seeing that enemy in anyone who u disagree with.
@@mattpet7913 Oil is literally apart of the earth already son, it takes a long time but its some thing that eventually heals itself.
Haha loved it. For a split second I almost thought you were gonna vouch for these girls freedom. Youre funny.
Thank God there was a glass frame. I hope it was produced in a factory that runs on oil. Like everything else.
Hey, you might enjoy Baumgartner Restoration. His expertise in restoring and repairing old paintings is next-level.
It's always the ones with dyed hair.
as someone with dyed hair, it's disgraceful honestly. instead of doing it because it's a colour that suits or a proper reflection on how you're feeling, these people just do it so more people look at them. that's all it is.
Danger hair 😂
@@Dragonfire-486 I remember when it was just people thinking It looked cool but certain "Communities" have made it all about attention seeking.
@@Dragonfire-486 Yea my friend has always had dyed hair , usually purple , he hates all the insane people have it now.
@@pilouuuuPoison Dart Frogs I tell ya
Wearing most likely a polyester top and clothes which would not exist without crude oil residue.
Two of them wearing glasses made with plastic frames made from crude oil residue.
Carrying a plastic coffee cup, and with carry bags most likely again made from polyester.
Staying indoors is a good idea nowadays... Crazy fuckers everywhere.
The museum was 3 steps ahead for stuff like this.
Those printed shirts required oil to make them
you can’t currently live in our society without using oil… that’s like, the entire problem…
I don’t know if any group has done more harm to a cause than these people. They are masters of making people want nothing to do with what they stand for.
Publicity. Simples.
i know right! they are so absolutely terrible and hatred inducing, I genuinely started to consider if the whole Just Stop Oil thing wasn't just some sort of 5D chess psy-op by "Big Oil" to discredit environmentalists in general by making people think they are all like these idiots.
Needs to be in jail for that mullet-thing alone.
It’s not jail it’s prison. VERY different
Ruining historical pieces of art should be judged as terrorism. This was attempted terrorism.
This isn’t inaccurate this is a form of physical force to intimidate for political aims.
It is terrorism. Agreed.
Pardon me, but how is it terrorism? It's vandalism, not terrorism. Please don't make words meaningless by misusing bad words for shock value, like the far-left already does.
@@88walkaThrowing soup on a painting is a form of intimidation? Softest man alive.
@@wuuwbduiqwgbdI apologize I know how intimidation can work outside of murder and physical violence..you know like destroying a priceless form of property plus I can see things outside my personal viewpoint…That’s my bad I’m not that simple.
The punishment should be paying the worth of the painting. I'm sure people will learn the lesson after losing a million.
or work it off
The paintings aren't harmed, they're behind glass. All they're accomplishing is making some poor janitor clean up their mess.
These are fire and heatproof, some soup on the multilayered laminated glass won't harm it. Some of the paintings are reproductions too!
@@COMMANDandConquer199 The first one shown in this video doesn't look like it's behind glass. The second one, yes.
Oh those paintings aren’t worth a single million. That first on alone is worth 83,7 million. They couldn’t pay this. Litteraly selling everything they owned couldn’t even get them close
It's thankful it wasn't destroyed! And yeah, they should have gotten the longer sentences!
Tomato soup stocks during this time: 📈