Physics of Computer Chips - Computerphile

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 сер 2016
  • You can't beat physics. Why the chip manufacturers are heading for a wall. We asked nano-scientist Phil Moriarty Professor of Physics in the School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham
    EXTRA BITS: • EXTRA BITS: More Silic...
    Teaching Physics in Ethiopia: • Teaching Physics in Et...
    Is it the end for Moore's Law: • Is it the End for Moor...
    Password Cracking: • Password Cracking - Co...
    Gamer's Paradise: • Gamer's Paradise - Com...
    / computerphile
    / computer_phile
    This video was filmed and edited by Sean Riley.
    Computer Science at the University of Nottingham: bit.ly/nottscomputer
    Computerphile is a sister project to Brady Haran's Numberphile. More at www.bradyharan.com

КОМЕНТАРІ • 702

  • @SilentControlX
    @SilentControlX 8 років тому +1380

    "You don't understand it, you get used to it" sooo relatable

    • @HeavenEdit
      @HeavenEdit 8 років тому +3

      Yep

    • @caparcher2074
      @caparcher2074 8 років тому +55

      It's not sad, it's just the way it is. No one can fully understand the implications of quantum mechanics (namely entanglement), which is why there are so many interpretations of the same observation. Look up the double-slit experiment and tell us that doesn't blow your mind.

    • @piotrnod6489
      @piotrnod6489 8 років тому +15

      females xD

    • @Kobriks1
      @Kobriks1 8 років тому +18

      Isn't it like that for everything we "know"? Classical physics is just as strange, we are just used to it.

    • @caparcher2074
      @caparcher2074 8 років тому +33

      Not really, quantum physics is very un-intuitive. The fact that an electron doesn't exist in any particular place or time (and is just a probability wave of being somewhere) until it is observed is something spooky that no one really understands. There's nothing like that in classical physics. Or the fact that two entangled protons can be a universe (or any length) apart and still affect each-other (instantaneously, breaking the laws of relativity).

  • @TheGodlikeBlock
    @TheGodlikeBlock 8 років тому +298

    "You don't understand it, you just get used to it"
    Probably one of the best physics quotes ever

    • @matty1756
      @matty1756 4 роки тому +3

      Yeah that is actually very profound , it keeps you going.

    • @carnylaw5872
      @carnylaw5872 3 роки тому +4

      It’s sounds like the food that’s served in US prisons and jails!

    • @sonicmaths8285
      @sonicmaths8285 11 місяців тому

      John von Neumann was the first one to say it. Give him the credits

  • @donaldasayers
    @donaldasayers 6 років тому +486

    How do the individual atoms feel about being manipulated?

  • @ivuldivul
    @ivuldivul 7 років тому +1012

    Phil, aren't you too large to call yourself a nanoscientist?

    • @DevangLiya
      @DevangLiya 5 років тому +84

      Dad, I told you not to make these jokes in UA-cam comments!

    • @Blox117
      @Blox117 5 років тому +30

      its okay, he identifies as a nanoscientist!

    • @morgengabe1
      @morgengabe1 5 років тому +9

      cissized pig

    • @elijahasefa389
      @elijahasefa389 3 роки тому +3

      He was referring to little phil... downstairs.

    • @hjenny
      @hjenny 2 роки тому +4

      If he's a nanoscientist, I hope I never meet even a microscientist, let alone a full scientist!

  • @TrebleWing
    @TrebleWing 4 роки тому +15

    My favorite connection from physics to electronics, is the fact that quantum tunnelling effects are at the heart of how flash memory and EPROMS work.

  • @alentech6091
    @alentech6091 8 років тому +6

    This is one of my all time favorite videos on UA-cam! I have watched this video about 7 times now and I just absolutely love how well Mr. Moriarty explains the semi-transistor manufacturing.

  • @lasagnahog7695
    @lasagnahog7695 8 років тому +97

    I don't always watch computerphile (over my head) but you could put Phil Moriarty in a video about paint drying and I would watch it........oh wait.

  • @jaredmeit6127
    @jaredmeit6127 8 років тому +104

    It seemed like the video ended while he was still explaining something.

    • @RoboBoddicker
      @RoboBoddicker 8 років тому +83

      Prof. Moriarty actually never stops talking. The best you can do is turn off the camera just as he changes topics.

    • @AlexOjideagu2
      @AlexOjideagu2 5 років тому +37

      He was about to unify classical and quantum physics

    • @tlz124
      @tlz124 3 роки тому +3

      He was about to show his pee pee

  • @jasonhunter6125
    @jasonhunter6125 8 років тому +436

    I want more of this guy. He could start his own channel and just talk and I think he'd have thousands of subscribers;)

    • @connorjenkins4181
      @connorjenkins4181 8 років тому +13

      He has his own channel. Called Phillip Moriarty.

    • @earfolds
      @earfolds 8 років тому +14

      He does have his own channel! Moriarty2112, or you could follow Sixty Symbols where he has many videos about physics!

    • @lexagon9295
      @lexagon9295 8 років тому +11

      You should watch Sixty Symbols, he features in literally several dozen videos there.

    • @iamjimgroth
      @iamjimgroth 8 років тому

      +Phi6er Aww really? I liked this guy. :/

    • @dosmastrify
      @dosmastrify 8 років тому

      seconded

  • @U014B
    @U014B 8 років тому +427

    Why don't they just download more RAM into the electron beam to make it go faster?

    • @cogwheel42
      @cogwheel42 8 років тому +121

      I'll create a GUI interface using Visual Basic to see if I can track down an IP address for the download.

    • @SparseSparse
      @SparseSparse 8 років тому +6

      CSI?

    • @JustinAlexanderBell
      @JustinAlexanderBell 8 років тому +15

      Usual Hollywood hacker nonsense, that particular excerpt is from CSI:NY.

    • @SparseSparse
      @SparseSparse 8 років тому +2

      Justin Bell I thought so

    • @HunterRodrigez
      @HunterRodrigez 8 років тому +33

      "we need to hack faster !!!"... 3 people typing at once... on the same keyboard

  • @HeavenEdit
    @HeavenEdit 8 років тому +90

    This was a really informative video. Some illustrations/animations to visualize what he said would have made the video even better, although I understand that they take quite some time to make.

    • @cogwheel42
      @cogwheel42 8 років тому

      Check out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photolithography

    • @chrisz5z
      @chrisz5z 8 років тому

      i agree. His experience as a professor really shines through.
      I'm not sure if there's a definite correlation, but all the physics professors I had in college were the best teachers I ever had. Along with their ability to explain things they were passionate/excited about their field

  • @DerekJohn
    @DerekJohn 2 роки тому +1

    I love how excited he gets to answer each question and you can tell it’s genuine too

  • @Pieh0
    @Pieh0 8 років тому +45

    More of this guy please.

  • @JeffOrford
    @JeffOrford 8 років тому +1

    One of my favorite Computerphile videos. Great explanation of concepts I've always wanted to understand. Thank you!

  • @davidwensboposaric5498
    @davidwensboposaric5498 2 роки тому +9

    Being a chemist, just having listened to a physicist, talking about mechanics, for the purpose of computing, I just realized that the electron couldn't care less about how it's manipulated and by whom.

  • @willo7734
    @willo7734 8 місяців тому +1

    Prof Moriarty is one of my favorite guests on any of the “phile” videos. Awesome guy and very good at breaking things down to a level I can understand.

  • @csmith9684
    @csmith9684 6 років тому

    I usually just understand 25% of these talks but just love this channel and will keep coiming back to it again and again. Thank you for this!

  • @callummunro7380
    @callummunro7380 8 років тому +3

    Very good speaker, very well explained, and engaging. This really helped me understand exactly what the subject was about. I'd love to have this guy as a teacher.

  • @LoanwordEggcorn
    @LoanwordEggcorn 8 років тому +1

    That was a brilliantly clear and energetic overview of modern chipmaking. Professor Moriarty explained how a Silicon transistor works, but didn't label it as such. The Silicon substrate is formed into the transistors by adding impurities (doping).

  • @blackoak4978
    @blackoak4978 8 років тому +1

    Wow, that was was barely within what I could follow all the way through. The few times I started to get lost he stopped and explained it a bit more. Very well done, and I even picked up a few new things.

  • @saltysandwiches3554
    @saltysandwiches3554 8 років тому +1

    This is brilliant! I would be really glad if you made more videos on this topic

  • @JakeDownsWuzHere
    @JakeDownsWuzHere 2 роки тому +1

    these videos are like the best thing in my life sometimes. thanks for continuing to make them. :)

  • @JhonPereda
    @JhonPereda 7 років тому

    This material is way over my head, but this video was fascinating. Thanks for putting it together.

  • @vinkbram
    @vinkbram 8 років тому

    I really admire Phil Moriarty's ability to talk around naming concepts like quantum tunneling, and keep his talk on track even with tangential questions.

  • @hamilpatel4025
    @hamilpatel4025 8 років тому

    Really like how you explain things, hope you do more videos in the immediate future!

  • @gdibble
    @gdibble 8 років тому +1

    Great video; thanks Computerphile and Dr. Moriarty :)

  • @chris24hdez
    @chris24hdez 8 років тому +6

    Moriarty is one of my favorite science communicators

  • @yoav116
    @yoav116 8 років тому +204

    hi there camera man!

    • @Computerphile
      @Computerphile  8 років тому +101

      Hello!

    • @TheAAMoy
      @TheAAMoy 8 років тому +16

      Was the camera man sitting on a basketball?

    • @yoav116
      @yoav116 8 років тому +2

      not enough giggles for that to be the case.

    • @sugarfrosted2005
      @sugarfrosted2005 8 років тому +4

      And this why movies tend not to use real mirrors!

    • @error.418
      @error.418 8 років тому +5

      movies use real mirrors, they just don't have the camera face on with the mirror

  • @xaosikk
    @xaosikk 8 років тому +4

    this was incredible to watch. the passion and conviction he showed was amazing

  • @chadleyb79
    @chadleyb79 6 років тому +2

    This is a great effing interview.. awesome enthusiasm and passion.

  • @HeiligerGrimmnir
    @HeiligerGrimmnir 7 років тому +1

    I learned SO much from this. Thank you.
    I also love his passion. It excited me to learn this.

  • @andyandybobandy
    @andyandybobandy 8 років тому

    This is probably my favorite video on the channel.

  • @RogerBarraud
    @RogerBarraud 4 роки тому +25

    2019 update: 5nm in the works, 7nm in production (AMD Ryzen 3000 series, e.g.)

    • @quangho8120
      @quangho8120 4 роки тому +3

      So if 14nm = 50 atoms, 7nm = 25 atoms, 5nm = 17 atoms. Getting there

    • @nickharrison3748
      @nickharrison3748 4 роки тому +4

      3nm in lab

    • @gs-nq6mw
      @gs-nq6mw 4 роки тому

      yet they are too inneficient

    •  4 роки тому +3

      Thats not the case there. 5nm isn’t exactly 5nm. It does not represent a geometrical shape on transistor. It’s just the technology’s name. You can call it “marketing”. The real limitation for geometrical shape of transistor is 7nm. Nothing more than that.

    •  4 роки тому

      For silicon ^^

  • @jspeed04
    @jspeed04 8 років тому

    This man is brilliant and captivating. Would definitely enjoy more videos featuring him.

  • @igorvieira344
    @igorvieira344 8 років тому

    please, more on the physics of computer hardware! there's been so many amazing inventions and discoveries through the years in the semiconductor industry so we can use computers as we know it...

  • @paulbell337
    @paulbell337 5 років тому +72

    Watching this in 2019, they are now manufacturing 7nm microprocessors, how things move on.

    • @humorss
      @humorss 4 роки тому +4

      intel 14nm have 8nm wide fins in a finfet transistor, I think they are making features bit smaller than 7nm in the absolute sense.

    • @soraaoixxthebluesky
      @soraaoixxthebluesky 4 роки тому +3

      And on what he call Extreme UV (EUV)

    • @forloop7713
      @forloop7713 3 роки тому +10

      @SuperTanner But how can they go smaller than atoms

    • @funposting8912
      @funposting8912 3 роки тому +4

      And tomorrow morning a 5nm machine’s getting delivered to my home.
      Let’s come back in a year, see where we’re at

    • @tamil-ml
      @tamil-ml 3 роки тому +4

      we are in 5nm stage now

  • @gregoroque
    @gregoroque 6 років тому +12

    "If you find that confusing.. Good" - soo funny and soo true

  • @IndividualBean
    @IndividualBean 8 років тому +17

    I can never get enough of Professor Moriarty. Such a fantastic and interesting person!

    • @ivanpuentes711
      @ivanpuentes711 2 роки тому

      You should have seen him in Sherlock Holmes

  • @dermeister1957
    @dermeister1957 7 років тому +7

    God, I love how professor Moriarty explains stuff !

  • @mfaizsyahmi
    @mfaizsyahmi 8 років тому

    Nice to see you again Dr Phil!

  • @aonoymousandy7467
    @aonoymousandy7467 5 років тому +1

    this is great info, since I come from a physical science background this shows the application of what I learned, wish they had a class on the physics of computers

  • @PokeDude1995
    @PokeDude1995 8 років тому +4

    Physics AND computer science, all with Professor Moriarty. Great combo, I really enjoyed this episode. Thanks guys!

  • @colmtesticles
    @colmtesticles 8 років тому

    The physics and technology in making the 13.5nm light that is talked about here is some of the most advanced applied physics in industial RnD going on im the world today. Primarily this work is done close by to you, in The Netherlands. I would love to see you or Brady make a video on it. great job on videos. From another Irish physicist.

  • @JakeeBoss
    @JakeeBoss 4 роки тому

    I love how you can see how passionate this man is about what he does.

  • @architectinth
    @architectinth 2 роки тому

    This interview elevated my understanding of how we're able to manipulate atoms. Thank you.

  • @gg0x6767
    @gg0x6767 8 років тому

    This is my favorite video in a while.

  • @AndrewMurrell
    @AndrewMurrell 8 років тому

    I brought up the fact that Chemistry and Physics and ultimately everything that follows is a seamless whole just divided into digestible parts to a chemistry instructor once, and he almost flipped his lid. It was almost the same reaction from the physics department, yet they worked together constantly on things, though the chemists tend to be more reserved and the physicists tended to let their reservations go a bit, especially on things that went "boom". Nice to hear the Professor say nearly the same thing, about the relationship.

  • @mitchumsport
    @mitchumsport 8 років тому

    great stuff, hoping for more stuff about chip manufacturing and such :)

  • @CheapSushi
    @CheapSushi 7 років тому

    Love this guy and his energy. Great talk as well.

  • @cogwheel42
    @cogwheel42 8 років тому

    To elaborate on the "Layers" question, yes, it's very much done in layers. In fact, even the first layer wasn't fully described here. After the exposed (or unexposed, depending on the process) areas of the polymer are washed away, another layer of some material is applied. Then the places where the polymer remained are washed away, leaving the new material only in the gaps. The material can be dopants for the underlying silicon, metal layers to connect components, insulating layers to separate things, etc. It can even be exposed to etchants, rather than a new material, to remove whatever layer is showing.

  • @anything525
    @anything525 8 років тому

    I really liked this sort of unplanned interview

  • @richardrisner921
    @richardrisner921 3 роки тому

    Really cool to see semiconductor fab processing explained here!

  • @Sheepyhead
    @Sheepyhead 8 років тому

    It's very interesting to dive into the physics and chemistry of electronic computing, it's not a subject I've explored much as a computer scientist.

  • @sansthepungeonmaster5864
    @sansthepungeonmaster5864 7 років тому +1

    I was wondering, what is the limiting factor in hard drive size, both physical and storage related? if you could do a video explaining, that would be appreciated.

  • @dimbulb23
    @dimbulb23 8 років тому +25

    Videos like this immunize me from the Kruger-Dunning Effect.

    • @miladbassil2730
      @miladbassil2730 8 років тому +1

      same here my friend. i hqd to look up the effect so im even more ignorant ;-)

    • @LJdaentertainer
      @LJdaentertainer 8 років тому +3

      putting you in your place is a simpler way of saying it

    • @sugarfrosted2005
      @sugarfrosted2005 8 років тому +10

      If you think it did that, you should be worried.

    • @dimbulb23
      @dimbulb23 8 років тому +1

      sugarfrosted Okay... it was just a booster.

    • @VenturiLife
      @VenturiLife 8 років тому +4

      Or even the Dunning-Kruger Effect.

  • @themoogman7522
    @themoogman7522 6 років тому

    Great video, I'd love to see more like this

  • @mandaloin
    @mandaloin 8 років тому

    This guy is awesome! It's very obvious he's gushing with knowledge and enthusiasm of his subject.

  • @NotRealNamesAgain
    @NotRealNamesAgain 8 років тому +2

    Watched extra bits, still want more.

  • @Rompopful
    @Rompopful 8 років тому +60

    I don't know why but he reminds me of Roy from The IT Crowd
    Just of course more intelligent than, "Hello IT, have you tried turning it off and on again?"

    • @Killluha
      @Killluha 8 років тому +16

      Similar accent

    • @TheGenericNerd
      @TheGenericNerd 8 років тому +9

      He's also got the Roy-esque quality of talking about intricate stuff in a non-jargon way

    • @enricorov
      @enricorov 8 років тому +2

      Was about to comment this, brilliant.

    • @EgoShredder
      @EgoShredder 8 років тому

      ...and gestures.

    • @MrTombombadilla
      @MrTombombadilla 8 років тому +1

      I was wondering who he reminded me of!

  • @Jeff121456
    @Jeff121456 8 років тому

    Welcome back professor. I had wondered about your absence.

  • @sproga_265
    @sproga_265 6 років тому

    I love how excited he got for the silicon question.

  • @jubeh
    @jubeh 8 років тому

    great video, we need more low level hardware videos like this

  • @danway60
    @danway60 8 років тому

    This was a really good video. Lots of detail.
    Could you do a video about error checking/handling in chips (CPU's). I read a few years ago that now CPU's are becoming smaller, there are more errors in the calculations. I would love to know how manufacturers get around the errors.

  • @paulanzel5980
    @paulanzel5980 8 років тому

    I'd love to hear Prof Moriarty talk about spintronics and photonics if you have him on again.

  • @StankyPickle1
    @StankyPickle1 8 років тому

    This is awesome! More videos like this please!

  • @davidpike766
    @davidpike766 8 років тому +2

    This guy is magic, and clearly loves his stuff. Excellent.

  • @leonardoveras1
    @leonardoveras1 8 років тому +34

    Just a silly question: doesn't diffraction screw up with the lithographic process considering that light has to go through such tiny apertures?

    • @evilakah1
      @evilakah1 8 років тому +4

      Yes, which is why you use light of very small wavelengths.

    • @Sakkura1
      @Sakkura1 8 років тому +10

      The wavelengths they're using in mass production today are not that small. I believe 193nm is still standard, even though they're making features as little as ~14nm in size (actually many parts of a "14nm" process are not 14nm, but it's all pretty much to scale compared to older process nodes like 22nm).
      The next step is (supposed to be) EUV, where they do drop to very short wavelengths and high energies, as discussed in the video. They are having a lot of issues getting that to work for mass production though.

    • @davesextraneousinformation9807
      @davesextraneousinformation9807 8 років тому +6

      The diffraction of light really is a limitinig factor when reducing the size of features. One of the ways semiconductor manufacturers get around this is phase shift masking, which Prof. Moriarty explained as two masks just slightly offset from each other.

    • @miladbassil2730
      @miladbassil2730 8 років тому +1

      i didnt get how shifting the two templates helps

    • @davesextraneousinformation9807
      @davesextraneousinformation9807 8 років тому +6

      +sewer renegade There are actually several ways of masking phase shift masks. I think Professor Moriarty is portraying the general concept of setting up having the edges of the photomask phase shift the light passing by so that when the light reaches the photoresist on the wafer, the edges of the patterns are being enhanced by constructive and destructive interference of the light waves, thus making features smaller than the wavelength of light possible.

  • @KarnKaul
    @KarnKaul 8 років тому

    It is so amazing to see Prof Moriarty talk about computer science. *beaming* :D

  • @Satscape
    @Satscape 8 років тому

    Great video... More of Professor Moriarty!

  • @peterbonnema8913
    @peterbonnema8913 8 років тому +1

    I thought that the wave interference of the photons (as in, interference you see with the double split experiment) would be come a problem. But instead you could create a mask that actually utilizes this phenomenon to create interference patterns that match the target pattern on your silicon sheet.

  • @leonjones7120
    @leonjones7120 4 роки тому

    You're a gifted explainer of these topics.

  • @Rasecz
    @Rasecz 7 років тому

    I could listen to this guy for hours

  • @biggSHNDO
    @biggSHNDO 2 роки тому

    I freaking love this video, man.

  • @LowLightVideos
    @LowLightVideos 4 роки тому +5

    Three years ago they were talking about 14 nm, today we're talking about 5 nm; so this video becomes history in less time than it would take to study Electronics.

    • @aravindpallippara1577
      @aravindpallippara1577 2 роки тому

      Unfortunately the 5nm and 7nm are really brand names than actual sizes of features - they are usually much more refined 10nm process which are capable of higher densities by eliminating issues with previous 10nm and 14nm processes.
      Essentially we are right up at the limits of manipulatable sizes when it comes to computing - most every improvement now comes from extremely complex and well designed architecture - cache for instance which is what amd rides on for their superior processing of late with 5000 and coming 6000 series chips

    • @LowLightVideos
      @LowLightVideos 2 роки тому

      @@aravindpallippara1577 You need to search before replying, and address what was written.
      Plants are being constructed in Arizona, Tainan, etc. with 2 nm coming in 2025 - call it creative naming or fudging on the numbers - each new plant builds a smaller process.
      People don't invest and they don't spend over a hundred billion to convince you, you are not convinced.
      Instead the money is spent to place billions of transistors in the space previously occupied by one transistor, decades ago.
      They really are getting smaller.

  • @SenneChristiaens
    @SenneChristiaens 8 років тому

    Amazing video. Learned a lot.

  • @pokecon14
    @pokecon14 7 років тому +3

    8:43 ish - How do they make the masks with features that small?

  • @steinarne79
    @steinarne79 8 років тому

    The energy of his explanations.... HE should be duplicated in the kindergarten, school, high school... NOBODY cannot be energized and curious the way he is talk and explain things! His energy in language would make me a damn poet!!

  • @Nam3Iess
    @Nam3Iess 8 років тому

    I loved this! So informative :)

  • @VR_Wizard
    @VR_Wizard 6 років тому +1

    You said the wavelength is a limit but the nobel prize last year was for the invention of microscopes which overcome this wavelength barrier. I think they used the light emitted by proteins and blocked the light emitted by neighbouring proteins so that the resolution was down to one protein. There might be a way to use that for making smaller chips.

  • @aidenwinter1117
    @aidenwinter1117 2 роки тому

    Big man working on small stuff, respect

  • @t3silver
    @t3silver 7 років тому

    Great video, thanks!

  • @LastofAvari
    @LastofAvari 8 років тому

    Nice to see Phil again. :3

  • @puellanivis
    @puellanivis 8 років тому +1

    My fiancé worked for Intel, he was sent around to various clean rooms and such to work on the computers that were running the electron scanning microscopes that they were using for debugging chips.
    The whole process is pretty cool to me, as I just stopped learning the abstractions of the CPU at the logic gates, and VHDL design.
    A curious wonder, what kind of feature size would a hobbyist be able to achieve? I mean, there's that guy who built a macro-computer by using full chips for his transistors, and I know most of us are better off using FPGAs anyways. But say someone wanted to get into etching their own silicon, what do you think would be the range of quality that they could get to?

  • @jarednorton6350
    @jarednorton6350 2 роки тому

    Please do an updated one of these about the current physics of the newest chips

  • @stevehallam0850
    @stevehallam0850 8 років тому

    Fascinating stuff!

  • @eddiemattia1245
    @eddiemattia1245 6 років тому

    Amazing video! I have a question about Professor Moriarty's explanation of how the semiconductor industry is able to create such precise patterns on transistors. When the two offset masks are placed over the silicon wafer and light is shown, how is it that the light is able to deterministically etch a pattern? Why would it not behave like a wave/particle in the double slit experiment and defract into a probabilistic wave pattern on the wafer?

  • @factsverse9957
    @factsverse9957 8 років тому

    I have been searching for this video. Thanks! UA-cam! For putting it into Recommendation.

  • @naami2004
    @naami2004 7 років тому

    I can listen to this man for hours ...

  • @radioham2387
    @radioham2387 8 років тому

    Will you please carry on with this it was brilliant !!,

  • @matthewnorman7507
    @matthewnorman7507 8 років тому

    so.. a moving electron creates a magnetic wave/wake in it's passing that expands radially. can you take advantage of these wakes and layer the silicone wafers and their circuitry in a way that layer two could be providing power to layers 1 and 3 as well of course with less amps/volts but still enough to open or close gates... perhaps even have currents passing through the wafers laterally connecting circuits on all layers at differing voltages and the gates be three way and open differently due to the differing currents being direct or eddie currents... etc.
    would these methods improve or be inovative to the industry or are they already in use?

  • @miladbassil2730
    @miladbassil2730 8 років тому +2

    i love this guy he explains so well.get him on the show more often plz

  • @joelamoako6778
    @joelamoako6778 5 років тому

    best video i'm seen on computer chips

  • @scabbynack
    @scabbynack 8 років тому +89

    "Quantum Mindset" #bandname

    • @jackismname
      @jackismname 8 років тому +2

      +MaxPower ^ rofl

    • @MephLeo
      @MephLeo 8 років тому +17

      But damn if you try to find the location and time of any given concert in particular.

    • @nicadi2005
      @nicadi2005 8 років тому +6

      +scabbynacker "Are you thinking with quanta yet?" #tagline

  • @steinmar2
    @steinmar2 7 років тому

    We missed you!

  • @-kenik9629
    @-kenik9629 8 років тому

    Hm, I heard that there are directions that light moves in with its waves, and some crystals can eliminate some of those directions. Would it be possible to use properties like that to carve chips?

  • @TeganBurns
    @TeganBurns 8 років тому

    This makes me so excited/happy!! :D

  • @CCSABCD
    @CCSABCD 8 років тому

    I'll follow you anywhere Phil

  • @tvvsgaming6062
    @tvvsgaming6062 8 років тому

    So is it possible to make computer what uses light insted of copperwires or is this a thing allredy?

  • @TaxPayingContributor
    @TaxPayingContributor 8 років тому +11

    This guy won't shut up. I love it!!!!

  • @HerrLavett
    @HerrLavett 8 років тому

    Congratulations! A very successful comback.