I'm not an expert in any way but, it seems to me that because contradictions do not exist in nature, contradictions should not exist in abstract concepts. A tree that exists and not exist at the same time does not occur in nature. The _laws of logic_ is a set of human-made rules to engage in discourse about any given topic. Even the abstract concept of god presupposes the laws of logic where a god can't both exist and not exist at the same time.
@@jobuschicken By observation. If written/spoken language and abstract concepts did not exist, _contradictions_ wouldn't be a thing. And if this were the case, the _Laws of Logic_ would be nonsensical.
@@icypirate11 this is an illogical hypothetical as you have to presuppose transcendental things like language and logic to to even deem it as nonsensical and then to communicate it.
![Lp. Последняя Реальность #107 РОДНОЙ ДОМ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IK3QKzKUlHM/mqdefault.jpg)
I'm not an expert in any way but, it seems to me that because contradictions do not exist in nature, contradictions should not exist in abstract concepts. A tree that exists and not exist at the same time does not occur in nature. The _laws of logic_ is a set of human-made rules to engage in discourse about any given topic. Even the abstract concept of god presupposes the laws of logic where a god can't both exist and not exist at the same time.
How did you come to the conclusion that contradictions don’t occur in nature? Did you use logic?
@@jobuschicken By observation. If written/spoken language and abstract concepts did not exist, _contradictions_ wouldn't be a thing. And if this were the case, the _Laws of Logic_ would be nonsensical.
@@icypirate11 this is an illogical hypothetical as you have to presuppose transcendental things like language and logic to to even deem it as nonsensical and then to communicate it.