Martingale Strategy for Roulette

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 136

  • @froyocrew
    @froyocrew Рік тому +407

    if only I had infinite money, oh wait if I did I wouldn't be gambling lol

    • @h2t26
      @h2t26 Рік тому +3

      Casinos make 60-80 9f their profit from richest 20% of players. These are very wealthy pl. So idk if I could say that if I had so much money that it's like monopoly money to me that I wouldn't use it to play games for entertainment. It's pl who don't have money to throw away that should stay away.

    • @Pikopika10191
      @Pikopika10191 Місяць тому

      😂😂😂😂

    • @isshiki1782
      @isshiki1782 19 днів тому

      😂😂😂😂😂

    • @sportsdunfun3530
      @sportsdunfun3530 8 днів тому

      If I had infinite money I would only be gambling

    • @abbadox315
      @abbadox315 7 днів тому

      @@h2t26 They said, "infinite." Very stark difference there if thought about.

  • @chessandmathguy
    @chessandmathguy Рік тому +189

    If a single losing streak in many many years is enough to ruin you, it's not worth it.

    • @brianlevesque7822
      @brianlevesque7822 Рік тому +4

      There is a way of beating both streaks and chops as they occur. Keep studying.
      I haven't loss once.

    • @yelbegen1975
      @yelbegen1975 Рік тому

      ​@@brianlevesque7822 Me too, this strategy not for addicts. This is for patients.

    • @ramiendaniez34
      @ramiendaniez34 Рік тому

      @@brianlevesque7822 how???

    • @regedya
      @regedya Рік тому

      @@brianlevesque7822elaborate

    • @CinemaXperts555
      @CinemaXperts555 Рік тому

      @@brianlevesque7822please ive been researching a lot explain. do you have a stop loss?

  • @soulsnail2495
    @soulsnail2495 Місяць тому +15

    I’m a vip at my local casino nustar, been playing for well over 8 years, you’d be surprised how many 11 in a rows come up, i would say on average 2x a night. 7x in a row is even more common to the point u see it happen almost within every 2 hrs. The longest i’ve witnessed was 23x red in a row. The odds may say one thing but believe me it does happen more than you think, gamble with what you can comfortably lose.

    • @johnnyboychess
      @johnnyboychess 19 днів тому

      I have also experienced multiple suspect sessions… have lost 10 in a row and 13 in a row while betting on 2/3rds of the board. I also didn’t play much roulette before then and quit soon after

    • @cribasile3402
      @cribasile3402 3 дні тому

      E non ti è mai venuto in mente di cambiare la puntata mentre accade?🤔

  • @stayinghyped3378
    @stayinghyped3378 3 місяці тому +10

    Ill be honest ive done a math system for the most part, put together 1 50% where its mixed with a 66% with a jackpot at 42% respectfully on each turn. Without clanging anything i lost all my profit back on 10 major loses i realized the biggest reason i lost was
    1. Chasing without proper betting strategy
    2. Emotions that i was certain to win but the % doesnt change
    3. Now im back winning after figuring out my issues 😅

  • @5gearz
    @5gearz 4 дні тому +1

    Andy casually teaching us how to gamble

  • @jovan2550
    @jovan2550 16 днів тому +1

    Let it spin for couple times, when it gives 4/5 of same kind then you place the bet on opposite and continue doubling if you lose. That way you have more chances if you can afford 8/9 spins.
    Only bet money that you can lose.
    Sorry for my English.

  • @ulpinight5665
    @ulpinight5665 6 днів тому +5

    How can I increase my chances in russian roulette?

  • @slobiden.2593
    @slobiden.2593 4 місяці тому +1

    I would love to see an experiment, where people are given a fixed amount of cash in a casino and the odds are slightly in their favour and see if they can win. I still think people will lose their cash.
    Even if the odds were perfectly fair and balanced. Most people want to triple or even 10x their money. That’s a 10 percent chance at best. So even if the games had a player advantage, I think most casual players or drunks would lose all their money too. But professionals would work the system.

  • @gangsta8929
    @gangsta8929 16 днів тому +1

    A 0.16% chance of losing $5k with a 99%+ chance of winning $10 is still a negative expected value. There’s no point where you have an edge in this strategy

  • @qazwsx6340
    @qazwsx6340 7 місяців тому +17

    the problem is if you do $1 bets (as an example) and you have $10 total to play with, your max win is $1 and your max loss is $10. same as if you have $1 million. you have a tiny chance of losing, but if you lose it's -$1million, and if you it's just $1. the expected change in money is the same as with a standard betting strategy. over infinite games you still lose more money than you win

    • @ccubsfan94
      @ccubsfan94 Місяць тому

      Your not playing for a single play, you're hedging the losses over multiple plays. Its a statistical anomaly to not land on a color over 9 plays, you're hedging for that.
      So, the bankroll is big for the loss, but a small gain. Overtime you'll gather a bit, if the table limits allow

  • @cloudedBeats
    @cloudedBeats 5 місяців тому +11

    You can increase your chances by starting right after a long streak as well a limit your play time. Set a realistic goal not too far off your starting bankroll and walk away when you hit it same for losing

    • @carebear2883
      @carebear2883 4 місяці тому +10

      Long streaks don’t change a thing, roulette has no memory.

    • @stewbeef8808
      @stewbeef8808 4 місяці тому +2

      Quitting ahead only works if you never ever ever play again.
      If you go back on a regular basis, some days you will win and some days you will lose and over time...that will work out to a net loss.
      Casinos exist *because* this logic doesn't work. If it did, everyone would do it and casinos wouldn't be a viable business.

    • @carebear2883
      @carebear2883 4 місяці тому

      @@stewbeef8808 so simple yet impossible to understand for so many people.

    • @aethere4l
      @aethere4l Місяць тому

      Streaks of 10 straight black are rare because it's rare to get 9 in a row.
      Once 9 in a row has already happened, though, the chance of the 10th is 1/2 as the chance of the first 9 being black are already 100% (they've already been resolved).

  • @superbear617
    @superbear617 4 місяці тому +1

    Table minimums reduce the number of consecutive losing spins before a wipe out, making a wipe out more probable than you show.

  • @boomstories
    @boomstories 17 днів тому

    a bet of 10$ multiplied by it's probability is 9.984$
    all of the bets added together (10 230$) multiplied by the probability of not winning a single time is 16.368$
    Meaning if you have your theoritical infinite amount of money, you will lose 6.384$ over a period of x, which I do not know is how long, because I don't really work with statistics so I don't know how to count that out.

  • @jangrygiel9934
    @jangrygiel9934 4 місяці тому +15

    Casinos don't just give away money. There's no way to earn anything without first losing someone/yours money

  • @jonathanzavala6806
    @jonathanzavala6806 6 місяців тому +3

    Yeah, the fact that it makes your odds almost 99% is meaningless. You were losing money along the way, the casino is only giving back what you already gave them. Basically, 98.7% chance you win $10, 1.3% chance house wins $5k, and they only need to win once. They’ll play that game any day of the week.

  • @chrisglover2697
    @chrisglover2697 7 місяців тому +2

    The odds 36/1 ensure the casino wins over the lifespan of the wheel as the casino has a extra number on the board they don’t give odds for number 0 if they gave 37/1 then it would be a different story but there a business after all

  • @froyocrew
    @froyocrew Рік тому +4

    expected value still negative though, so doesn't really matter

  • @boskinspace4263
    @boskinspace4263 14 днів тому

    I think you oversimplified this. You're talking about bets on red or black but there are still one or two zeros depending on which type of roulette boards you are playing on.
    Furthermore doubling your bet is not required if you're using a smaller bet against larger odds. For example if you bet on the 12 numbers 1 to 12 you win 3 to 1 so you can make 3, $1 bets and still break even before you have to increase your bet. The roulette board has several different ways to bet with payouts That Vary all the way up to 36 to 1 conceivably you could bet on a single number 35 times, lose all 35 times, then increase your wager to $2. Continue making $2 bets until your total expenditure exceeds $70 then switch to $3 bets. You can continue this pattern until you reach the table maximum of $10,000. Since every bet you make will cover all of your losses you will always come out ahead unless you exceed the allowed streak length at which point you lose everything and that will happen so never play with money you cannot afford to lose.

  • @NotBot-420
    @NotBot-420 6 днів тому

    Most tables have a spread which means the amount you can change your bet, for this reason. If the min bet is 100, the max bet is not going to be 10,000. If the max bet is 10,000 the min bets is going to be like 1,000. Probably not factoring the green's either.
    If you want to give yourself higher chances gambling learn how to play texas holdem where you don't play the house.

  • @BT.70
    @BT.70 11 місяців тому +3

    want to make 200x minimum? first look for a robotic table or a table that keeps throwing red numbers back to back to back, join the table (if u buy in with 100 start with 10$ bets) if it lands on black you double and double like normal, if you land on red you keep the 20$ or 40$ bet even $60 is fine if ur above 200, the goal is to hit back to backs which happens a lot, casinos win when people see 4 reds in a row and bet on black, but just gamble with the casino, be the water, bet on red, even though you hit 10 reds in a row you dont go to black, dont be a cheater nobody likes someone who switches teams not even when it gets rough and you have to bet half your networth. its all worth it when you then 1.5x your net worth and keep on going because never back down never what?

    • @BT.70
      @BT.70 11 місяців тому

      also might want to add. when a dealer shit talks u bet 10-40$ on green because being able to say you just made his week salary will make the win sweeter and therefore you have an edge over the casino because if you dont f* the casino the casino will f* you

    • @ryanx9777
      @ryanx9777 Місяць тому

      Does not work everytime

  • @willoughbykrenzteinburg
    @willoughbykrenzteinburg 13 днів тому

    I would suspect this is a large reason why they have limits at these tables. While you might win in the long run, youre only winning $10 per win at a $10,000 maximum bet table. From their perspective, they are wagering a mere $10 a hand with the potential to win $10,000+ on the last one.
    Id like to see a mathematical/statistical breakdown of that if you could do it. Supposing the player has a rule that they MUST play the maximum bet at least once if it ever gets there. What would be the expected winnings of the casino given a $10,000 minimum bet and the player must double their bet on every loss and play the maximum bet at least once?

  • @jovan3847
    @jovan3847 Рік тому +6

    but if you reduce base bet to 5$ you will have more trys

    • @ThatSweeperGuy
      @ThatSweeperGuy Рік тому +1

      Minimum bet is $10…. And $5 would give you only one more try. I’m not going to do the math for you

    • @h2t26
      @h2t26 Рік тому +2

      If table min is lower so is the table max.

    • @sonjaschellevis188
      @sonjaschellevis188 10 місяців тому +1

      I use online which allows for 10 cents bets, do the math ive been using it for days in a row and made up to 1 euro per minute

    • @carebear2883
      @carebear2883 4 місяці тому

      @@sonjaschellevis188someone has done the math already. Plenty of people, plenty of times. Keep playing and you’ll lose money. Then you can tell the casino is cheating like every other loser out there who doesn’t understand roulette is a losing game.

  • @kyleburke1886
    @kyleburke1886 18 годин тому

    why cant you just lower your initial bet to a point where even if you win 10 or even 11 times in a row it doesnt pass the table limit?

  • @amoghkshirsagar8687
    @amoghkshirsagar8687 7 місяців тому +4

    you heard it lets go

  • @mech0p
    @mech0p 5 днів тому

    this is what ive been thinking for awhile a nd tried it on fake roulette and it does work.

  • @ganesh8495
    @ganesh8495 28 днів тому

    This will occur in 1000 spins....
    Instead use 321 units when winning
    Start with 3 plus 1 if loss minus 1 if win

  • @xeldao
    @xeldao 4 місяці тому +2

    oh they know, that's why you can lose 50 times in a row.

  • @Carlos1618033
    @Carlos1618033 7 місяців тому +1

    Hey Einstein, do you know any casinos that allow chase betting? Cuz i dont 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

  • @richardseed8253
    @richardseed8253 28 днів тому

    It misses the existence of zero and double zero. There is a house percentage built in.

  • @nohandle8008
    @nohandle8008 Місяць тому

    dont like this system, you end up risking too much money for a small win the farther down the scale you go. and 11 in a row happens much more often than the calculated odds make you think. I think the Fibonacci system on a 2 to 1 spot is a much better system; the farther down the betting table you go you risk more to win more.

  • @rossparsons5077
    @rossparsons5077 3 місяці тому +1

    This doesn’t decrease house edge. This is misleading

    • @thomato494
      @thomato494 Місяць тому

      Watch the full video, he literally says its a bad strategy, are you stupid?

  • @3000shifty
    @3000shifty 7 місяців тому

    The house always wins, no matter the odds.

  • @asailijhijr
    @asailijhijr Місяць тому

    Just always bet the minimum on 00.

  • @ZeEvulFirefox
    @ZeEvulFirefox 8 днів тому

    when i was young and dumb I tried it on an online casino went well for awhile... were up around 6k Euro from 10 Euro start. then i had a losing streak, the doubling became impossible, thought f***... still have more money left and and went for all in because it surely cant be black 16 times in a row don't remember actual number. At the time i got a severe panic attack and massive regrets from having lost 6k although I only lost 10 but at the time I struggled to see it that way. Since then I have never gambled again.

  • @pedrofranck6014
    @pedrofranck6014 Місяць тому

    I'm a gambling adict now, thanks

  • @Krmpfpks
    @Krmpfpks Місяць тому

    I went to a casino once, more for the experience than because I thought I could win. I was willing to lose €100. I tried this, started with €1. Got into an argument with my wife why I didn’t change colors when the other color always was falling and kept betting on the same color, because I thought switching colors would change the probabilities but wasn’t sure.
    Lost all I was willing to gamble that night, and still don’t know if switching colors midway through does change this strategy or not …

  • @user-ct9zm5fq7l
    @user-ct9zm5fq7l Місяць тому

    A sucker really is born every minute

  • @Conflict-v8w
    @Conflict-v8w Місяць тому

    Hear me out… the smart guy said something

  • @kiantuhiwai344
    @kiantuhiwai344 5 днів тому

    Ow wow 10 wack until you walk home while my systems allows me to have 150 wacks with a bankroll of 6k 😂😂😂

  • @wukang3140
    @wukang3140 17 днів тому

    once had a guy i hated doing this on the outside... huge fleabag... betting 2 dozens... i hit the first dozen every time. He lost over 15k quick... was tearing up $100s
    crying that it's impossible... i'm like it's not impossible just highly improbable... you just watched it happen. how many more can u lose?
    shift change happened... then he signed himself out later, and declared bankruptcy that week :)

  • @bradensorensen966
    @bradensorensen966 8 днів тому

    98.7% to win $10 sounds good. But you have a 1.3% chance to loose $10k.
    If you played enough times you would need to win 333 times for a 1.3% chance of winning… $3.3k!
    Even your max winnings at the same odds as the houses’ 10k win is a third of their winnings and it takes significantly more wins for you to get LESS money!

  • @AviatorZone2958
    @AviatorZone2958 Місяць тому

    I only keep 3 back ups. 10 -20-40 dollar.
    Play the game 3 time in a day.
    If it work 2 days so my money double

  • @civil_leuthie
    @civil_leuthie 25 днів тому

    99.84% chance of winning $10. 0.16% chance of losing $5,120. Sounds good!

    • @jiyongjung8495
      @jiyongjung8495 7 днів тому

      No. You should see the accumulated loss = 10 + 20 + 40 + 80 + 160 + 320 + 640 + 1,280 + 2,560 + 5,120 = 10,230. So it's 99,84% chance of winning net $10 vs 0.16% chance of losing $10,230. So expected value is around negative 6.

  • @CatCrewSC
    @CatCrewSC 12 днів тому

    Lol, this is how I would get currency on twitch gambles. Using this strategy

  • @mathprofii7877
    @mathprofii7877 3 місяці тому +1

    Do NOT take this advice!
    With the martingale, you must double your bet each time you lose. If you lose 5 spins in a row, you will more than likely be at the table max.
    Roulette is a negative EV game.

    • @thomato494
      @thomato494 Місяць тому

      Yes.. that's what the guy in the video says you moron. Watch the full video next time before monkeying out

  • @JohnWalker-e6y
    @JohnWalker-e6y 7 місяців тому

    So what you’re saying is…I’ve got a chance!

    • @carebear2883
      @carebear2883 4 місяці тому

      Yes ! 100% chances of losing over time. Some chance of winning a small amount once, while risking a big amount.

  • @connor9024
    @connor9024 4 місяці тому

    I’m calling gamblers fallacy here

  • @fabianmendez1661
    @fabianmendez1661 Місяць тому

    Casino in fact know about this, that is why probabilities are not the same in real time, roulettes are 100% manipulated, i have a strategy that gives you 9.9999% of winning man, a way lot that your 99.84% but even there you lose because again, probabilities doesn't work as it should because roulettes are manipulated, when you add that manipulation to your strat to use it in your favor, then and only then you have a real winner strategy.

  • @nandisaand5287
    @nandisaand5287 Місяць тому

    The one guaranteed way to win at roulette is to not play it. Craps too. NOBODY put their kids thru college throwing dice.

  • @pokeball976
    @pokeball976 Рік тому +13

    The casino knows
    Then they activate the magnet to zeroes

    • @sonjaschellevis188
      @sonjaschellevis188 10 місяців тому +1

      Yeah but if you only bet on unevens the 0 counts

    • @squidward3907
      @squidward3907 8 місяців тому

      @@sonjaschellevis188lol no

    • @atulpandey145
      @atulpandey145 7 місяців тому

      Yes bro fu**k them

    • @abhikalla01
      @abhikalla01 3 місяці тому

      ​@@sonjaschellevis1880 or 00 are not counted in Unevens.

  • @Ladybird27
    @Ladybird27 4 місяці тому +1

    i'm gambling right now!

  • @shaq238
    @shaq238 6 днів тому

    So the answer is no then?

  • @maba8442
    @maba8442 Рік тому

    so you win 990 but lose 10K, probability is...?

  • @davidfiggs9806
    @davidfiggs9806 Місяць тому

    I have lost 11 in a row once no joke. Don’t assume your safe with this

  • @Kcasstevens94
    @Kcasstevens94 7 місяців тому

    I do a modified martingale in sports betting. Instead of just betting enough to recover my losses from the previous bet, I bet enough to still make my money when I do win. Just gotta keep the unit sizes in check.

  • @christhorne116
    @christhorne116 6 днів тому

    So you're gonna drop $5k to get $10 back?

    • @arush99561
      @arush99561 3 дні тому +1

      No.....u bet 5k to get back ur 5k

  • @Doom-5L
    @Doom-5L 8 місяців тому +5

    Some basic math:
    You are definitely not gonna play this only one time,
    Assuming P(W)=99.9 P(L)=0.1
    Lets assume you play 1000 times in your lifetime,
    Money won: 999*10 - 1*10000 = 10 ~ 0$
    Total waste of time, money and energy

  • @codyx8273
    @codyx8273 4 місяці тому

    hey, i created this strat 15years ago. whelp nvm...18th century trumps me lol.

  • @RobCantonJr
    @RobCantonJr 18 днів тому

    Aahhh yes the classic gamblers fallacy

  • @eyadkourdi2325
    @eyadkourdi2325 Рік тому +3

    Just yolo 13, trust me guys 😝

  • @themanhshsh
    @themanhshsh 3 місяці тому

    I start with 0,10

  • @kammelo569
    @kammelo569 Місяць тому

    So its basically the classic it doesn't matter how much i lose because when i win the next game I'll make it all back. 😂😂 That's gambling 101

  • @RobCantonJr
    @RobCantonJr 18 днів тому

    Bet $10k to win $10 😂

  • @ImranJagdat
    @ImranJagdat 6 місяців тому +2

    Bro I tried this system two times and lost 10 times in a row both times

    • @carebear2883
      @carebear2883 4 місяці тому

      Good for you, the lesson was expensive but hopefully it was learned. You won’t lose any more money, because you won’t do it again.
      Try winning your money back and it’ll ruin you.

  • @MatejVelican
    @MatejVelican 7 місяців тому

    They will kick you out if you do this. Ask me how I know.

    • @carebear2883
      @carebear2883 4 місяці тому

      You don’t know because they wouldn’t kick you out for that. This is a losing strat. Ask me how I know (spoiler : I simply used to be a dealer and I can tell you no one bats an eye about martingales).

  • @alexatedw
    @alexatedw 4 дні тому

    You can. But not by the math

  • @Zer0CraftGaming
    @Zer0CraftGaming 6 днів тому

    Risk vs reward says hell no

  • @adamgrimsley2900
    @adamgrimsley2900 5 місяців тому

    Nice

  • @danny5327
    @danny5327 7 місяців тому

    Ya used it did not win more than minimum wage.

  • @Nyruami
    @Nyruami 14 днів тому

    That´s mathematically incorrect, your chances just went from bad to worse. Let´s say one round is as many spins as it takes until you win 10$. You need 1024 winning rounds to make up for a single loss. Unfortunately, due to zero and double zero, your chance of losing 10 rounds in a row is 1 in 613. So, while your chance of putting 10.000$ on red and walking away with 20.000$ after a single spin is 47.368%, your chance of running this stupidity successfully 1000 times in a row is only 19.546%

  • @Herecules
    @Herecules Місяць тому

    You start after multiple times red or black hit, would save your money

  • @AussieAlex4
    @AussieAlex4 28 днів тому

    The problem is that casinos know this and will tell you that you can't play roulette anymore if they see you doing it.

  • @JohnSimons0314
    @JohnSimons0314 Місяць тому

    I have noticed that when I do this and start having success with it, zeros will start hitting more frequently. That can't be a coincidence.

  • @truckingeveryday5703
    @truckingeveryday5703 11 місяців тому

    Just sports bet with martingale there are no limits

    • @Hottylatina
      @Hottylatina 10 місяців тому

      Yess...

    • @fyfoh
      @fyfoh 7 місяців тому

      @@Hottylatina There's a limit to how many times you can double your bets, unless you have infinite money. Thus, you're likely to get wiped out eventually.

  • @h2t26
    @h2t26 Рік тому

    U improved possibility not odds. Yoir odds are the same no matter what. The payout which is less then odd also same no matter what. 10 spins can last a few min. If u struggled to to save 10k, you'd risk everything to get 10 bucks? If you didn't invest save, even bad interest will get u more then 10 bucks and u keep the 10k.

  • @vizzino777
    @vizzino777 8 місяців тому

    I thought everyone who create video is smart and also who comment bad about the martingale system are not smart too
    Think deep