Hmmm...someone grabs you. They choose to take one of their weapons out of the fight. Why would you also choose to take one of your weapons out of the fight? Why would you not use your two against their one?
If you start punching him with two hands faster than he can punch while grabbing you, he can back off (and that's ok, if it's your objective). But by grabbing you, it opens an opportunity to attack his articulation, incapacitating or immobilizing the opponent and maybe ending the fight sooner (again, that's just an option of many).
Many thanks
Thank you Master!
Always functional
What is Akban? Is it name or something
Duh.
done.
Hmmm...someone grabs you. They choose to take one of their weapons out of the fight. Why would you also choose to take one of your weapons out of the fight? Why would you not use your two against their one?
Controlling the opponents grab is essential, even before any ballistic moves with the hand or legs.
If you start punching him with two hands faster than he can punch while grabbing you, he can back off (and that's ok, if it's your objective).
But by grabbing you, it opens an opportunity to attack his articulation, incapacitating or immobilizing the opponent and maybe ending the fight sooner (again, that's just an option of many).
Exactly. That’s a possibility.