Basic Storm Spotter Training

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 жов 2024
  • Basic storm spotter training... recorded at the Pelham Civic Complex before a big crowd in March 2019. The trainer is Brian Peters, former WCM (Warning Coordination Meteorologist) for NWS Birmingham, now on the ABC 33/40 Weather Team.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 30

  • @Scovilletech
    @Scovilletech 4 роки тому +5

    Very Informative!!! I took storm spotter class in Macon, GA back in 2001. This was a great refresher with lots of better imagery. Just wish you could see his laser pointer on UA-cam.

  • @thetechiesworld
    @thetechiesworld 5 років тому +5

    Brian: "Does anybody have an idea what happened right about here?"
    Audience member: "The internet."
    James: "Doppler radar!"
    Brian: (To James) "You're not supposed to answer!"
    😂😂😂

  • @utej.k.bemsel3199
    @utej.k.bemsel3199 4 роки тому +3

    I live in Germany, we don't have many tornadoes around here, but in my youth i was interested in all kinds of natural phenomena, i read lots of books about it...one day we had a dirt devil in our area. At this time i was sitting on the roof of our garden shack, the thing came right in my direction...and believe it or not, i was so freaked out i jumped down 3yards down from the roof to the ground and ran as fast as my feet would carry me away...i thought it was a real tornado and that it would blow me away... :D

  • @swayjaayy5495
    @swayjaayy5495 2 роки тому +1

    Fantastic video!!! Man I wish I would have became a meteorologist. I'm a little too old to do it now. But if you are thinking about doing it and you're young, DO IT! Just go and do it. It's such a fascinating field.

  • @manda60
    @manda60 5 років тому +4

    This is sooo cool! I love you guys down there at 33/40! Here in Holland we do get supercell storms, though they're much smaller and low-topped. Great program here.

    • @alishamillican809
      @alishamillican809 4 роки тому

      I would have gotten a lot more from this if I could have seen where he was indicating with his pointer when describing the photos and diagrams.

  • @germanstorms2785
    @germanstorms2785 3 роки тому

    This is a really good presentation even for German spotters

    • @swayjaayy5495
      @swayjaayy5495 2 роки тому

      How often do you guys get tornadoes in Germany?

  • @peachxtaehyung
    @peachxtaehyung 3 роки тому +1

    I've never heard of supercells going in a circle or a supercell being truly stationary... I think that the slowest I've heard of in a supercell is like 6mph and that was the jarrell tx tornado. And I'm in the southern plains in Texas lol... I guess they're VERY rare as I've never here for just over 12yrs and been a weather geek for 2-3yrs now or so but even before I would watch weather coverage whenever we were expecting bad weather here

    • @swayjaayy5495
      @swayjaayy5495 2 роки тому

      I don't know about the supercell being stationary but yes , the Barrel, TX tornado was stationary. So I'd say the storm front stayed stationary. The supercell was most likely moving.

  • @marlertv8977
    @marlertv8977 5 років тому +3

    First time heard from Brian in a while good to see him

  • @maxmyzer9172
    @maxmyzer9172 4 роки тому +2

    12:38 it could be argued the very, very early tornadogenesis has the tornado spin up from the ground but ok

    • @pprophet
      @pprophet 4 роки тому +4

      thats way too complex of an idea to introduce in basic spotter training, especially considering thats still a very controversial subject in that we still are basically just guessing how tornadogenesis works,

    • @jaredpatterson1701
      @jaredpatterson1701 3 роки тому +2

      They DO form from the ground. All tornadoes are miniature versions of low pressure systems

    • @swayjaayy5495
      @swayjaayy5495 2 роки тому

      There's been theories of this but I'm most cases, hasn't been able to be backed in data. Though it appears that way in some cases visually, that's not necessarily what's happening. I mean think of it. That would mean dust devils could turn into tornadoes or that the wind is so strong that it swirls all the way up to the storm? No

  • @wrw0284
    @wrw0284 3 роки тому +1

    This video is awesome and James Spann is a national treasure!

  • @richardtaylor8165
    @richardtaylor8165 4 роки тому +1

    1:04:53 - are we sure that's not the tornado down already rather than just a FC? Pretty sure I see some ground debris under it, or am I seeing things?!

  • @DeniseLaFranceCDNpainter
    @DeniseLaFranceCDNpainter 2 роки тому

    Thanks for the helpful tornado info!

  • @waynestewart1919
    @waynestewart1919 2 роки тому

    I've had the honor of meeting this man a few times. James Spann is an Alabama icon. And very fun man to be around.

  • @coreyboothe4113
    @coreyboothe4113 5 років тому

    This is very interesting to me James tank you for posting

  • @schnitzelschnizel9448
    @schnitzelschnizel9448 4 роки тому +1

    Where is he mainly pointing to? Nobody knows what he is pointing to.

    • @peachxtaehyung
      @peachxtaehyung 3 роки тому

      Because the graphics on what we are seeing on youtube doesn't show it. But to the people in that room what they're seeing is a bright pointer kind of like a laser pointer you use for cats but instead of green it's like a white or something like that

  • @bodombeastmode
    @bodombeastmode 2 роки тому

    "heighth" isn't a word. You would think a meteorologist would know that.

    • @swayjaayy5495
      @swayjaayy5495 2 роки тому

      Actually it is. Look it up in the Webster dictionary. Think or know before you make claims like that.

    • @swayjaayy5495
      @swayjaayy5495 2 роки тому

      Heighth : is part that rises or extends upward the greatest distance i.e.- the highest part or summit. It's called a colloquial variant.

    • @bodombeastmode
      @bodombeastmode 2 роки тому

      @@swayjaayy5495 Colloquial variant, aka a bullshit word.
      You cherry-picked one example to prove your point. Everything else I can find says it's not a word.

  • @rogerwilco2
    @rogerwilco2 3 роки тому

    Why do they have so much very old photographs?
    Most of their stuff seems to be 20+ years old.
    That makes me think that what they are telling might be outdated knowledge as well.

    • @troopcom
      @troopcom 3 роки тому

      A tornado from the 1800’s formed the same way they do today. So the age of the photos is irrelevant.

    • @swayjaayy5495
      @swayjaayy5495 2 роки тому

      No it's not. Where are you getting that notion or information?