Super excited about what is to come! I love the great history of Omega that they continue to draw upon. Classy, technical and beautiful…triple threat!!!
Omega; probably the most significant watchmaker in history. I’m hoping they produce the Seamaster Planet Ocean Ultra Deep Professional in a usable size for the public.
They did, it is called the Planet Ocean. When you scale down the Ultra Deep it becomes the Planet Ocean. The public does not need an ultra deep any more than anyone else.
This is a great video. And It underlines the fact that this watch was made 20years(!) before those pieces we recognize as modern dive watches (fifty fathoms, sub, etc). As for the reason to make this video now: I think the planet ocean is up next for a makeover. And this is part of a multitude of videos up until the release of the new PO. I hope I am right, looking forward to it.
Omega should start a Heritage line, producing modern re-imaginings of classic watches. They’ve already had a few like the Seamaster 1948 or 300, and the Speedmaster ‘57. A modern take on the Seamaster 200 or some of the 80’s Seamaster Automatics would be great (in a larger size 40mm). And a square watch to rival the Cartier Santos or Tag Heuer Monaco.
@@BrittPearceWatches me too! Let’s see it! I’m assuming it’s related to the record breaking deep dive a few years back. That titanium beauty. I saw it live at their museum in Bienne.
Omega has such a great history and back catalog, would love to see them continue to pull from their heritage. Not slavish tributes with fauxtina but pieces that capture the spirit of the historic models.
@@bboooobbyy True. But I have also seen some brands distance themselves from their heritage for the sake of appeasing a new demographic. Engineering and innovation is important but combining that innovation with heritage is a perfect balance.
Dear Omega, Great presentation ,on a part of your history.I believe that myself and other Omega collectors, and fellow Omega owners, would greatly appreciate the re release of your iconic military issue Omega Seamaster 300 ST 165.024 from 1967," Big Triangle". This watch in its modern day re issue, would keep the Matte Black dial, and indices and hands as in the original. Please NO FAUX PATINA.but with modern lumen. A full lumed Bezel,, made of Aluminum,, treated for scratch resistance. A sapphire crystal and a master Co axial movement, for accuracy and anti magnetism. This watch, would have great appeal, due to its military heritage, rugged simplicity, and most importantly ,because there is a interest, in military inspired watches, as seen by releases of other top tier brand.We remain hopeful, and thankful , that you consider this suggestion. With humility, Thank you !
@@almac9203 Uhh... it's a bit of a long story I'm a fan of telephone soundboard prank calls, and an old bail bondsman called Fred Gordon Herbert from California is a pretty famous prank call victim known as the Bail Bondshman (the bearded guy on my pic) He was baited in a call to bail out someone from Diamond Bar Walnut Jail, and "Walnuts" became his favorite food in prank call (they spliced lines where he breaks his tooth on a walnut, asks shops for pumpkin spice walnuts, etc. etc.) and in another call, he talks about beastiality So I chose these two words as an homage to the old guy 😁 Rest in Peace, Fred (2018)
I have a SMP from 1998. Mine had the movement (quartz was an alternative at the time) and the much lesser common steel bezel which was the precursor to ceramic bezels. Serviced only once, it’s never missed a beat in the nearly quarter century that I’ve owned it! I love that watch and it still looks brand new! And oh yeah, I have a family tie to James Bond. My great uncle was the sound producer from Dr. No through Octopussy and was close personal friends with Sean Connery.
Dear Omega , Great presentation,on a part of your significant history .I as a Omega collector, would appreciate the re release of the 1967 MOD Omega Seamaster 300ST 165.024 .I truly believe this watch would be a success, given the interest with military inspired watches.A modern re issue, would have a aluminum bezel, that isfully lumed, and treated for scratch reristance.The dial wouldbe matte black, like original. The lumed indices and numbers, and " big triangle, " would be as origina.lThe movement, would be a master Co axial .Thank you for considering this proposal .
Refreshing to see omega running adverts that don’t bore on about the moon landing. Dive watches are dominated by one brand I’m afraid. And it’s as tight as their gas escape value.
Sorry, guys but the guy in the bathysphere was at one atmosphere of pressure inside of it. So the Omega watch that he was wearing was at no more pressure than walking in the park on a Sunday afternoon. That whole little drama was meaningless in terms of water leakage or a pressure rating of that watch. I also seriously doubt if the Diver in heavy gear was wearing that watch, not that he needed it for anything. The platform that he used to ascend was controlled from the surface by a crane operator and a diving Supervisor with a watch of his own and using a pneumofathometer tied to the Divers umbilical to tell his depth.
That's some big gonads on the two fellows who weaseled into the cast iron bathysphere, and went so deep! Especially back then. What happens if the cables snap? How would they retrieve them back then? 923 meters! Hell no!
And yet my new speedmaster (saphire sandwich) couldnt survive standard humidity... im just playing thats what warrenties are for things happen. But man get that quality under control swatch group come on.
Sounds about right. I get my watches wet in the shower, or maybe washing dishes, or a dog! I do take them off for washing my cars and bikes, but that is only in deference to the paint on the vehicles!
Rec diving limit is 42m not 12m. Furthermore Barton and Beebes bathysphere was kept the occupant at atmospheric pressure negating the need for a dive watch. Really omega? If you’re gonna promote a dive watch line as a serious tool watch then this doesn’t help.
It's a shame that any of them are able to get as much for their watches. Based on the actual cost of materials, research and development, and manufacturing/sales, none of them are worth what they command. We pay the exorbitant costs to finance all of the adventures/teams/celebrities that these companies sponsor. I hate it because when I stare close up at some Rolex models, and some Omega watches as well, I get lost in all of the fine detail, and think about the manufacturing techniques that these outfits have developed.
Guys, buy a seiko, use it for three years, then get another one. I never want to be looking at the same face for that long anyway. People won't think any less off you. Off to get the new car next week. .bored of the last one.
If there's a new square diver coming from Omega... I AM FREAKING HEREEEE FOR IT
fancy seeing you here Watch Gringa!n😂 and same rocking my Seamaster 300M 😁
I sure hope so. I would appreciate the stirring of the stale divers market
I thought you hated Omega?
I hope this is a teaser video for a new Omega Marine re-release or modern version.
I KNOW RIGHT?! WHERE THE FUCK IS THE RELEASE?!
Super excited about what is to come! I love the great history of Omega that they continue to draw upon. Classy, technical and beautiful…triple threat!!!
Right up my alley, a Reverso lover - come on Omega, don't let me down.
Wow.. Beautiful music! These are now tales of legends ...
Genius. I’ve thought long and hard about the crown problem. This simple approach is brilliant.
Omega; probably the most significant watchmaker in history. I’m hoping they produce the Seamaster Planet Ocean Ultra Deep Professional in a usable size for the public.
They did, it is called the Planet Ocean. When you scale down the Ultra Deep it becomes the Planet Ocean. The public does not need an ultra deep any more than anyone else.
This is a great video. And It underlines the fact that this watch was made 20years(!) before those pieces we recognize as modern dive watches (fifty fathoms, sub, etc). As for the reason to make this video now: I think the planet ocean is up next for a makeover. And this is part of a multitude of videos up until the release of the new PO. I hope I am right, looking forward to it.
Proud to wear my Seamaster!
Omega should start a Heritage line, producing modern re-imaginings of classic watches. They’ve already had a few like the Seamaster 1948 or 300, and the Speedmaster ‘57. A modern take on the Seamaster 200 or some of the 80’s Seamaster Automatics would be great (in a larger size 40mm). And a square watch to rival the Cartier Santos or Tag Heuer Monaco.
Yeah I would love to see them re release the U.K Air Ministry watches.
Omega is about to announce a new deep diver. I can feel it! 🔥 🔥 🔥
They have to be! And I am HERE FOR IT!
@@BrittPearceWatches me too! Let’s see it! I’m assuming it’s related to the record breaking deep dive a few years back. That titanium beauty. I saw it live at their museum in Bienne.
That's why I own a Seamaster. There the very best 👌
Omega has such a great history and back catalog, would love to see them continue to pull from their heritage. Not slavish tributes with fauxtina but pieces that capture the spirit of the historic models.
Love the video and the presentation of these historical achievements! Now make another video unveiling the new version of this watch!!!! PLEASE
Finally!!! A brand that actually leans into their heritage rather than turn away from it.
what?? 😅 Almost all historical brands trade on their heritage through reissues and legacy models. Very common
@@bboooobbyy True. But I have also seen some brands distance themselves from their heritage for the sake of appeasing a new demographic. Engineering and innovation is important but combining that innovation with heritage is a perfect balance.
You should re-release this EXACT watch, only with a co-axial movement. Do that and I'll buy it.
Probabilmente riesciro a essere lì un giorno
Rolflex is just an imitation of The Omega brand! More history, more innovation no playing games with the consumers!
Dear Omega, Great presentation ,on a part of your history.I believe that myself and other Omega collectors, and fellow Omega owners, would greatly appreciate the re release of your iconic military issue Omega Seamaster 300 ST 165.024 from 1967," Big Triangle". This watch in its modern day re issue, would keep the Matte Black dial, and indices and hands as in the original. Please NO FAUX PATINA.but with modern lumen. A full lumed Bezel,, made of Aluminum,, treated for scratch resistance. A sapphire crystal and a master Co axial movement, for accuracy and anti magnetism. This watch, would have great appeal, due to its military heritage, rugged simplicity, and most importantly ,because there is a interest, in military inspired watches, as seen by releases of other top tier brand.We remain hopeful, and thankful , that you consider this suggestion. With humility, Thank you !
I'd also love to see the re-release of a different "big triangle, sword hand" Seamaster, namely the Seamaster Diver 300M "2254.50.00"
@@walnutsandbeastiality866 I have to ask what is with your username?
@@almac9203 Uhh... it's a bit of a long story
I'm a fan of telephone soundboard prank calls, and an old bail bondsman called Fred Gordon Herbert from California is a pretty famous prank call victim known as the Bail Bondshman (the bearded guy on my pic)
He was baited in a call to bail out someone from Diamond Bar Walnut Jail, and "Walnuts" became his favorite food in prank call (they spliced lines where he breaks his tooth on a walnut, asks shops for pumpkin spice walnuts, etc. etc.) and in another call, he talks about beastiality
So I chose these two words as an homage to the old guy 😁
Rest in Peace, Fred (2018)
Omega! Please for the love of all that is Holy, make a Seamaster 300M Diver, in a smaller size! 39.5mm would be amazeballz!!
Would buy in a heartbeat!
I have a SMP from 1998. Mine had the movement (quartz was an alternative at the time) and the much lesser common steel bezel which was the precursor to ceramic bezels. Serviced only once, it’s never missed a beat in the nearly quarter century that I’ve owned it! I love that watch and it still looks brand new!
And oh yeah, I have a family tie to James Bond. My great uncle was the sound producer from Dr. No through Octopussy and was close personal friends with Sean Connery.
If it’s quartz, I’m in.
More like this please
Bring back the big triangle!
Very nice video. Maybe an Omega dive watch coming soon? Competition for the Submariner!
i strongly want this one a remake is a request to omega
great video
Yeah is good 👍
But my Favorite Brand was Breitling … 🥰
Next video: Introducing the 2022 Omega Marine.
👍🤣
Rolex catalog: The same watches every year
Omega catalog:
Dear Omega , Great presentation,on a part of your significant history .I as a Omega collector, would appreciate the re release of the 1967 MOD Omega Seamaster 300ST 165.024 .I truly believe this watch would be a success, given the interest with military inspired watches.A modern re issue, would have a aluminum bezel, that isfully lumed, and treated for scratch reristance.The dial wouldbe matte black, like original. The lumed indices and numbers, and " big triangle, " would be as origina.lThe movement, would be a master Co axial .Thank you for considering this proposal .
Refreshing to see omega running adverts that don’t bore on about the moon landing. Dive watches are dominated by one brand I’m afraid. And it’s as tight as their gas escape value.
A square dive watch? I’m in.
Love this video!
Omega you need to reissue the Dinosaure watch.
do one with the ploprof please!
Sorry, guys but the guy in the bathysphere was at one atmosphere of pressure inside of it. So the Omega watch that he was wearing was at no more pressure than walking in the park on a Sunday afternoon. That whole little drama was meaningless in terms of water leakage or a pressure rating of that watch. I also seriously doubt if the Diver in heavy gear was wearing that watch, not that he needed it for anything. The platform that he used to ascend was controlled from the surface by a crane operator and a diving Supervisor with a watch of his own and using a pneumofathometer tied to the Divers umbilical to tell his depth.
That's some big gonads on the two fellows who weaseled into the cast iron bathysphere, and went so deep! Especially back then. What happens if the cables snap? How would they retrieve them back then? 923 meters! Hell no!
They really should make a modern reissue of this!!
I prefer Omega over Rolex, when you consider history, innovation and price Omega outperforms Rolex.
And without the stupid hype that surrounds Rolex, Omega make great watches, long may that continue.
This is true, I’d give Rolex the design award though, and the branding. But omega is technically better for sure
Lucky, coz you can’t buy a Rolex
@@bentennyson6009 Yes you can and from an authorised dealer, you just need to understand how to do it.
@@martinjn2920 I understand you have no hope of buying a sports Rolex from an AD without spending a lot of money on lesser brands.
❣️❣️❣️
Excellent video, thank you 👍🏻👍🏻
Oh my god I would love an art deco reverso style watch from omega!
And yet my new speedmaster (saphire sandwich) couldnt survive standard humidity... im just playing thats what warrenties are for things happen. But man get that quality under control swatch group come on.
Reissue the watch already haha
WOW, 太美了
cutenes overloaded
I would like to see Omega add more gold to some watches. Precious metal options. White and yellow rose.
.0000000000001 % of those who buy a divers watch actually use it for diving. ( I made that number up ).
Sounds about right. I get my watches wet in the shower, or maybe washing dishes, or a dog! I do take them off for washing my cars and bikes, but that is only in deference to the paint on the vehicles!
@@hugejohnson5011 Your honesty is admirable.
Rec diving limit is 42m not 12m. Furthermore Barton and Beebes bathysphere was kept the occupant at atmospheric pressure negating the need for a dive watch. Really omega? If you’re gonna promote a dive watch line as a serious tool watch then this doesn’t help.
Take my money…
I Hope omega bring back peter blake 2254.50
Marine release please…..
Omega is not Rolex, don’t copy Rolex’s price strategy. please on your way.
It's a shame that any of them are able to get as much for their watches. Based on the actual cost of materials, research and development, and manufacturing/sales, none of them are worth what they command. We pay the exorbitant costs to finance all of the adventures/teams/celebrities that these companies sponsor. I hate it because when I stare close up at some Rolex models, and some Omega watches as well, I get lost in all of the fine detail, and think about the manufacturing techniques that these outfits have developed.
Rusty
A
Another watch that nobody will care about and that will sell at 40% under retail within 6 months.
You are sad.
Guys, buy a seiko, use it for three years, then get another one. I never want to be looking at the same face for that long anyway. People won't think any less off you. Off to get the new car next week. .bored of the last one.