This has to be the best footage I have ever seen of a Space Shuttle period. Discovery Space Shuttle deserved this kind of appreciation. Discovery took care of our astronauts and now we shall take care of her. The music was simply beautiful.
What a dull title for such a brilliant video! Really brilliant compilation of some stunning footage. Discovery was my favorite shuttle and I'm glad her final voyage was so thoroughly cataloged.
It's just unbelievable that there are people inside that magnificent piece of engeneering as it roars through the skies! Just look at the flames coming out of that thing...
I stayed up till 4AM to watch this from my laptop in California! I'm glad I didn't miss it, but literally 5 minutes after it was all over I passed out. Woke up 4 hours later for High School, and only 2 teachers were sympathetic......the 2 teachers I happened to NOT have that year. I passed out in the first 3 classes though, and my teachers let me be too, so that was a bonus!
"And for those watching, get ready to witness the majesty and power of Discovery as she lifts off one final time". I get a lump in my throat every time I hear him say that.
my wife and I had the good fortune to be able to visit her home by Dulles airport, I also had a lump in my throat. sad day when the shuttles stopped flying...
Well Jacob, the problem became public opinion, 2 shuttles lost with 2 crews, visited their memorials at Arlington by the way, it became difficult to justify the loss of lives. Sad but another step in our March toward the stars.
Bro the music and the video editing blew it up even more this video rocks I’m a kind of guy who says turn music off let’s hear engines but this video is awesome
That's your opinion and Inrespect kt, in my opiniok it was very well made a'd enjoued it. If you didn't like it, remember that there are plenty of other videos without music while there only is this one with this music.
Over 90 million horsepower alone for the three SSME, one of the most sophisticated and powerful engine ever made. Each one could be flown more than 50 times. This power will now lift the SLS rocket/Artemis. The engines will be sadly discarded, Space Shuttle Discovery itself has flown over 238 million km and has been a full year in space(all flights combined)
Quite frankly as cool as it was, I'm glad it was retired off. it was a very dangerous craft. Although I am sad that they've not really replaced it with anything else.
What a glorious program and great achievement for our nation. My father in law worked as a contractor for Honeywell who's team worked with several mission control sts missions. He's got an awful lot of shuttle mission patches somewhere.. his team wasn't involved in launch but control of several functions during orbit.. just unbelievable.
Some of the most awesome videos about the Shuttle launches ever: Ascent Imagery Highlights. Whenever and whatever comes next: I hope they'll get coverage as great as this
lol guys, you didnt like the music ? Go watch other launches then, it's not like this is only space shuttle launch on UA-cam... stop complain and go find what you like elsewhere. There are like thousands if not tens of thousands of space shuttle launch videos without music on YT.
Back in may 2002, my brother and I visited NASA Kennedy Space Center and we where lucky enough to see Endeavour on the launch pad ready for it's launch for STS-111. Unfortunently the launch was postponed until June 5th and so we missed the actual launch. However just seeing it on the pad and getting to take my own pictures, and that I wasn't too far away from the shuttle itself on our special NASA tour made the experience one of my greatest so far.
Jon-Terje Bjørnerud, I lived in Lakeland, Florida from 1980 to 1982 and again from 1984 to 2006. I watched the first launch of Columbia on TV and went outside to try to see it, not knowing at that time if it was even possible to see from where I lived. It was excruciating to have to leave the TV long enough to run outside, do a scan of the sky, then run back inside to see if I missed anything. I did it several times because I wasn't sure how long it would take for it to break above the horizon with me being around 80-100 miles away, but I never did get a glimpse of it because of a broken cloud cover between where I was and the Cape that day. The second launch occurred while I was at school and our teacher took the class outside to see it. So, I found out that it was possible to see it from that far away. And it was amazing! Over the years, after that, I saw several others... daytime launches... nighttime launches (REALLY spectacular), but always from half the state away. Sadly, I was outside watching when the Challenger was lost. I saw it happen with my own two eyes. I had no idea what had happened initially because from that distance you couldn't really see and make out any part of the shuttle, tank, or boosters. All you could see was the flame from the boosters and the smoke trail. When the explosion occurred, the fireball was not visible to me. It appeared to just be a huge ball of smoke. Then I saw the individual plumes of the two boosters separate and then cross back in toward each other. Having no idea the severity of what had just happened, I actually chuckled to myself and thought how weird that launch looked compared to the others I'd seen before. It was at that point that my sister came to the door and told me that they announced on the radio that it had exploded. I felt sick. Quite a few years later - I can't remember the exact year (mid to late '90s) or which orbiter it was - a friend of mine and I decided to take off on a spur of the moment trip to the east coast to try to catch a launch they had scheduled for that evening. We had no plan and we weren't worried if they scrubbed the mission. We just decided to go. We found a place once we got over there where a lot of other cars had gotten off the main highway onto one of the causeways that goes to the Cape and had pulled off onto the side of the road to view it. Unfortunately, I didn't look on a map back then to see exactly where we were to get a reference of how far we were from the launch pad, but looking on Google maps now and going based on what I remember, I don't think we were much more than 5-10 miles away. It was an early evening launch (6-7 pm), and it was still daylight, but when the boosters ignited, you could see the sky light up over the trees that were between us and there. The ground was shaking. As soon as it cleared the trees and we could directly see it, the light seemed as intense as the sun and you could feel the heat from the flames. My chest was vibrating from the sound. I could never find the words to describe the sensation of the experience. Nothing that would do it justice, anyway. After reading your comment here, and sensing the enthusiasm you seem to have for it, I can only say that I really wish you had been able to witness it for yourself when you were there. There's one catch to my story, and it's the reason I'm telling you all of this, because of your story. It's that in all those years that I lived in Florida, and I drove a truck for about ten years there delivering for an auto parts chain with stores just a few miles away from the facility, I never once visited the Space Center. Not for a lack of desire... I've always been a major aviation and space enthusiast. For whatever reason, I just never did make it there for a visit of the complex. I would love to see all of that stuff up close and to see the massive vehicle assembly building. One day, perhaps. Your comment rekindled these memories and I just thought I'd share them with you. Have a great day.
Thank you for sharing your story, also with the aweful day of January 26 1986. I can't imagine how terrible it must have been to know you actually witnessed the event live. I did see it as well, but on a broadcast, it sent chills down my spine, and even today I feel it inside when thinking about the event, just as september 11. We also visited ground zero (sept 11) on the same vacation, in april 2002 and it was tough to see all the pictures, letters and flowers on the fences surrounding the area. Just before my brother and I came to Kennedy Space Center we where visiting DC, so of course we had to explore the national space and air museum as well as a trip to Arlington Park to pay our respects at the memorial for the crew of Challenger. (I got some paper pictures that I will try to scan one day from both the Cape, museum and Arlington, and post along with other moments from that vacation) You must take a trip to the Space Center, it is just stunning, and all the memorbilia they got will certainly impact you. If it still excists, do the VIP tour, it is definatly worth it. Just as a curiousity, I used to drive longhaul and local delivery with trucks as well :) Take care, and stay curious :) /regards JT
What a great trip you and your brother took. I've been told by many people that I should visit the national air and space museum in DC. I now live in Tennessee, and I have a cousin that lives fairly close to DC that I could stay with. I just need to make the time. Thanks for the response. From one former trucker to another, take care. :)
I;m in tears that was beautiful! I have been a fan of the Space Shuttle program since I was 7. I'm 32 now and I still have my Space Shuttle articles that I kept in an old photo album. I even have the article when the Hubble Telescope was placed into orbit. This is the first time I have seen an on-board shot of the boosters breaking away. SPECTACULAR!!! Hope to stop by sometime I do live in VA Beach. HOOYAH!
I really miss watching these mammoths take off. They may have been money sponges and not the most practical but they were beautiful in their way. The power!
I wondered that too. According to Wikipedia's article entitled "Space Shuttle", under the "Launch" section: "At T-minus 10 seconds, hydrogen igniters were activated under each engine bell to quell the stagnant gas inside the cones before ignition. Failure to burn these gases could trip the onboard sensors and create the possibility of an overpressure and explosion of the vehicle during the firing phase."
Beautiful! Thank you God for bringing the crew and shuttle 'home' and Thank you for blessing the flight leaders and ground team while they were in orbit.
Motormonkeynl, The reason they do the rollover sequence is the shuttle passes through the " maximum dynamic pressure zone " where the shuttle is under the most stress when it passes through the sound barrier so they roll over to a " heads down " position to reduce pressure on the shuttle. The shuttle will also reduce the throttle down to 65% & when the shuttle has passes through the maximum dynamic pressure zone it will throttle up to 105%. Hope this helps.
Very powerful and moving video. Definitely a wonderful clip. This should be shown in every classroom world wide to show the progress of space travel. Hands up for me.
The tanks outer coating is foam. Long range cameras saw the foam hit the wing. They could not see the leading edge on camera because it was flying away from the camera. Pieces of the panel were recovered that verified it was a hole not a crack.
Absolutely amazing... The shot at 7:40 when the boosters separate and you can see the shuttle and tank fly away is breathtaking. I don't think we as a species ever thought we'd be able to take that shot. Can't wait to see what the future holds.
@MrElSatan they are little paper covers over the OMS Pod nozzles on the orbiter's nose to prevent water and debris from collecting in there while the orbiter is on the launch pad.
The panel piece was lodged in between the RCC panel and the aluminum spar. There is 1/2 meter of space between them. On orbit in microgravity, the panel piece dislodged and floated away. There was no change of aerodynamics because when it happened the atmosphere was to thin to make a difference. A tile was fixed near the hatch. It did not have to be fixed. The orbiter lands with a 100 gouges after re-entry with no issues on heat and aerodynamics. RCC panels are more critical then tiles.
Plasma did destroy the wing during re-entry. On launch there is no plasma because they are not going fast enough. The hole is suggested by pieces of the panel recovered and by a large piece that floated away from the wing on orbit on day two.
@iMensah81 Well then is there a DVD in the works. I would still like to have it for my collection without the crappy youtube compression? I've been flying HD cameras on my rockets for a couple of years now.
I remember STS-1 launch and how brave I thought Commander Young and copilot Crippen were to sit astride those SRBs and that huge fuel tank for the FIRST time. What a ride into the unknown! John Young was the obvious man for the task at the time (very much akin to Armstrong in Apollo 11), a *very* capable and totally cool test pilot and, indeed, Chief of the Astronaut Office.
20yrs ago, I was working NASA QA, and got the opportunity to see everything you're seeing here up close on the service gantry, then 2 weeks later, a nighttime launch of Discovery {STS-82). Of all the things I have seen and done in my life, seeing Discovery in that way, and then the launch at night, ranks near the top of my "Cool" list.
It was not the only thing that made it unsafe. Shuttle was the most dangerous manned vehicle ever created. The fact that the crew cabin was inline with the main fuel tank, the fact that it was winged and not a lifting body (winged craft make bad space vehicles because they require Atmospheric orientation). The use of Solid fuel (which can NOT be turned off once started) on a manned rocket and also the cause of the strong vibrations on Shuttle AKA shook of the foam that brought Columbia down.
@Sibs1990 the rockets are the kind of engines wich can run without any external oxidizer (i.e. oxygen): indeed they are used for the space missions because of this capability. The rockets you see at 7:53 are the Solid Rocket Boosters, wich use a solid propellant, while the shuttle's main engines (the three engines at the bottom of the shuttle) use oxygen and hydrogen, both in a liquid state.
This is the best of the best, the most sincere, the 1st person view of what it takes to launch a space vehicle with over a MILLION MOVING PARTS, and they did it over and over again. THERE IS NOTHING MORE BEAUTIFUL than the STS Missions....PERIOD!!!!!!!
The Soviets did build and launch the Buran shuttle. The difference between that and the US version is that the Soviet shuttle was completely automated and could operate and land without a crew. It was launched only once due to the collapse of the Soviet Union.
@TheBayourat A lot of the cameras used for these shots aren't HD cameras as they're too expensive or too weighty to be launched like this. You can get some HD from ground-based cameras and still photos, but that's about it.
the shuttle was unsafe because there was no way for the crew to eject from the craft in the event of an emergency. Unlike the apollo rockets, where there was a launch escape system to eject the capsule to safety. likewise in space the LEM served as a lifeboat for the crew of apollo 13, granted it was never designed to do so, but at the end of the day, the only way a shuttle crew could be saved in an emergency would be to have another shuttle dock and transfer the crew, which takes time.
@@thomaskofod992 read somewhere that they were placed into engines nozzles to prevent birds, incects and other debris getting inside while waiting for launch. After launch pressure change would simply make them inflate and pop out.
@7:44 such a rare view of just the shuttle and the fuel tank heading off towards space without it's SRB's, and i just love the sound the explosive bolts when they release - it's that sound that u know the tank is empty
I ment, even aerodynamic at launch.. They finally punched a hole. Did they shoot each time in lab on the new element? If not, they might made few cracks and then punch a hole along them. Plasma would destroy wing internal structure through a hole (not crack) almost immediately. Yaw deviation on reentry would big before plasma, Shuttle control surfaces were not effective enough, and crew detect that even not on manual. There is no sign of this on cockpit docu. Hole is suggested by the test video.
Folded escape space capsule for eight in cargo bay is affordable, cause it weight much less than conventional. It has nothing more than retrorockets (if you desire to leave shuttle on orbit), heat shield, full-sized or small dragchute and maybe spare breathing oxigen. Anything else is provided by EVA space suit. In an emergency it's possible to launch this separately by small-size rocket in proximity. Or use even few modified ICBM warheads. Apollo LM took Lunar Geminy sleds as a backup,attached.
If you put that in perspective, then nothing is safe. Be it the 747 you are riding, or the car that you're driving anything could go wrong. Fun fact: More people died on car accidents annually than air accidents or space shuttle accidents combined.
+Ken Rick was connected to 2 contacts inside the shuttle and next to the 2 hoses from the tank to the shuttle, when they disconnect, the doors slam shut and make a flat surface. for the front strut is a Bolt that is driven into The shuttle. and explosive charge breaks the bolt flush.
I've heard about ice. Why foam did? Isn't external tank blanketed? It was a documented test when they shot in lab and punched a hole. In reality this hole would be visible on launch by ground camera and sufficiently change aerodynamic. Must be crack, eroded then by plasma. Nearly as it was with SRB gap on STS-51-L
Shuttle EVA suits are not tethered to the ship with breathing air like the early EVA's. They are independent. Columbia never had a docking module installed. She was too heavy to go to the ISS. If a rescue was to take place 2 shuttles would face each other payload bay to payload bay. The rescue shuttle would have a robot arm that the crew would use to move other crewman up and back using EVA suits. This would take time to get in and out of suits and pre-breathing to go outside.
@Sibs1990 The engines get liquid Oxygen pumped in with the liquid Hydrogen, which is ignited and pushes the Shuttle on its way. In fact because there is no air in space, rockets work more efficiently than in-atmosphere because the gases can expand very rapidly without opposing pressure.
Those main engines look so whimsical compared to the thundering SRBs. How much thrust do they provide and how much thrust is provided by the SRBs, does anyone know?
Quite a production, I must say. The first 3 minutes, I was in the mood for, especially. The middle was so full of overbearing march music, a bit too much in the music department, to me. Liked the mix of real sound though. Anyway, thanks for posting this. I enjoy videos of the Shuttle and other space vehicles. Would love to take that trip into space, myself.
Werner Von Braun?, He deserves alot of credit but remember that Germany had people visit Goddard's research HQ and they learned some things that definitetly helped to speed-along their rocket program.
I'll never forget the first Sonic Book I ever heard , which was from Discovery actually. She set of SO many car/house alarms in our neighborhood when she was coming home. It was great :)
This has to be the best footage I have ever seen of a Space Shuttle period. Discovery Space Shuttle deserved this kind of appreciation. Discovery took care of our astronauts and now we shall take care of her. The music was simply beautiful.
What a dull title for such a brilliant video! Really brilliant compilation of some stunning footage. Discovery was my favorite shuttle and I'm glad her final voyage was so thoroughly cataloged.
Nice.
I can't understand any difference between all those shuttles made🙄😭!!
Im from the future in 2021, Starship prototype exist here😃
ه ز م ح اه
@@justevencurangcurang5232 covid
4:18 for the start of the interesting stuff.
4:45 is also epic
I love that you chose to pair a metal song with the launch. The song compliments the epicness and badassness of the launch.
It's just unbelievable that there are people inside that magnificent piece of engeneering as it roars through the skies! Just look at the flames coming out of that thing...
I stayed up till 4AM to watch this from my laptop in California! I'm glad I didn't miss it, but literally 5 minutes after it was all over I passed out. Woke up 4 hours later for High School, and only 2 teachers were sympathetic......the 2 teachers I happened to NOT have that year. I passed out in the first 3 classes though, and my teachers let me be too, so that was a bonus!
"And for those watching, get ready to witness the majesty and power of Discovery as she lifts off one final time". I get a lump in my throat every time I hear him say that.
Cannikin as do I
my wife and I had the good fortune to be able to visit her home by Dulles airport, I also had a lump in my throat. sad day when the shuttles stopped flying...
John Evans why'd they stop flying shuttles?
Well Jacob, the problem became public opinion, 2 shuttles lost with 2 crews, visited their memorials at Arlington by the way, it became difficult to justify the loss of lives. Sad but another step in our March toward the stars.
cost.
HELLO FROM COSTA RICA!
Beautiful Beautiful video
Absolutely breath taking. I can't begin to imagine what it must feel like to be sitting in that cockpit when they light it off.
This amazing video footage fully stands on its own without the need for
adding strobe-effect cuts, reflective imagery and a bizarre music track.
Azure Horizon nasa made it
@@r4ndom7000 10 years ago
Bro the music and the video editing blew it up even more this video rocks I’m a kind of guy who says turn music off let’s hear engines but this video is awesome
The power of those initial boosters is just insane.
Is the type of fuel that make them so powerful. Is 10 times powerful than uranium. Close to antimatter.
Daniel Jimenez
You realize that what you said makes no sense, right?
Ski Sandown? Thrown, visit long, grow
I think it ammonium perchlorate. Check out the u tube video of that plant blowing up in Nevada. Wow
@@dougb6239 Its PBAN
this just makes me want to play Kerbal Space Program
I'm playing KSP right now!
good idea :P
Yay, KSP rocks !
Try out KoS mod, link here: forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/68429-0-23-5-Kerbin-Shuttle-Orbiter-System-v2-08-aka-Kerbin-Mini-Shuttle
creeper man thats awesome man thanks :D
Ruined it with that horrible loud music. I'd rather listen to raw audio and coms
Ben Robertson ....yep. Totally agree. The shuttle is it's own soundtrack.
This sends into space that the concept of being intelligent automatically credits someone to work at NASA
That's your opinion and Inrespect kt, in my opiniok it was very well made a'd enjoued it.
If you didn't like it, remember that there are plenty of other videos without music while there only is this one with this music.
St ,. Sigh give me ,. Is my record report
youre right that music is terrible and only the launch sound had to be heard
Over 90 million horsepower alone for the three SSME, one of the most sophisticated and powerful engine ever made. Each one could be flown more than 50 times. This power will now lift the SLS rocket/Artemis. The engines will be sadly discarded, Space Shuttle Discovery itself has flown over 238 million km and has been a full year in space(all flights combined)
I'm still really, really sad that the space shuttle has retired. I salute you both Discovery and Atlantis 😢
As well as Challenger and Endeavour
And Columbia...
Azure Horizon Bush ended it.
Quite frankly as cool as it was, I'm glad it was retired off. it was a very dangerous craft. Although I am sad that they've not really replaced it with anything else.
What a glorious program and great achievement for our nation.
My father in law worked as a contractor for Honeywell who's team worked with several mission control sts missions. He's got an awful lot of shuttle mission patches somewhere.. his team wasn't involved in launch but control of several functions during orbit.. just unbelievable.
The level flight look and the inverted flight look the engines rumble and the rock music omg blew my Mind turn up the volume
Some of the most awesome videos about the Shuttle launches ever: Ascent Imagery Highlights. Whenever and whatever comes next: I hope they'll get coverage as great as this
Gotta love the shuttle program but what spacex. Is doing now is definitely the future of American space flight
Could have done without the music
Ever heard of clicking off the sound?
Mike .R. But then there’s no cool rocket sounds
lol guys, you didnt like the music ? Go watch other launches then, it's not like this is only space shuttle launch on UA-cam...
stop complain and go find what you like elsewhere.
There are like thousands if not tens of thousands of space shuttle launch videos without music on YT.
@@SnaxDesAvions yes
Back in may 2002, my brother and I visited NASA Kennedy Space Center and we where lucky enough to see Endeavour on the launch pad ready for it's launch for STS-111. Unfortunently the launch was postponed until June 5th and so we missed the actual launch. However just seeing it on the pad and getting to take my own pictures, and that I wasn't too far away from the shuttle itself on our special NASA tour made the experience one of my greatest so far.
Jon-Terje Bjørnerud, I lived in Lakeland, Florida from 1980 to 1982 and again from 1984 to 2006. I watched the first launch of Columbia on TV and went outside to try to see it, not knowing at that time if it was even possible to see from where I lived. It was excruciating to have to leave the TV long enough to run outside, do a scan of the sky, then run back inside to see if I missed anything. I did it several times because I wasn't sure how long it would take for it to break above the horizon with me being around 80-100 miles away, but I never did get a glimpse of it because of a broken cloud cover between where I was and the Cape that day. The second launch occurred while I was at school and our teacher took the class outside to see it. So, I found out that it was possible to see it from that far away. And it was amazing!
Over the years, after that, I saw several others... daytime launches... nighttime launches (REALLY spectacular), but always from half the state away. Sadly, I was outside watching when the Challenger was lost. I saw it happen with my own two eyes. I had no idea what had happened initially because from that distance you couldn't really see and make out any part of the shuttle, tank, or boosters. All you could see was the flame from the boosters and the smoke trail. When the explosion occurred, the fireball was not visible to me. It appeared to just be a huge ball of smoke. Then I saw the individual plumes of the two boosters separate and then cross back in toward each other. Having no idea the severity of what had just happened, I actually chuckled to myself and thought how weird that launch looked compared to the others I'd seen before. It was at that point that my sister came to the door and told me that they announced on the radio that it had exploded. I felt sick.
Quite a few years later - I can't remember the exact year (mid to late '90s) or which orbiter it was - a friend of mine and I decided to take off on a spur of the moment trip to the east coast to try to catch a launch they had scheduled for that evening. We had no plan and we weren't worried if they scrubbed the mission. We just decided to go. We found a place once we got over there where a lot of other cars had gotten off the main highway onto one of the causeways that goes to the Cape and had pulled off onto the side of the road to view it. Unfortunately, I didn't look on a map back then to see exactly where we were to get a reference of how far we were from the launch pad, but looking on Google maps now and going based on what I remember, I don't think we were much more than 5-10 miles away.
It was an early evening launch (6-7 pm), and it was still daylight, but when the boosters ignited, you could see the sky light up over the trees that were between us and there. The ground was shaking. As soon as it cleared the trees and we could directly see it, the light seemed as intense as the sun and you could feel the heat from the flames. My chest was vibrating from the sound. I could never find the words to describe the sensation of the experience. Nothing that would do it justice, anyway. After reading your comment here, and sensing the enthusiasm you seem to have for it, I can only say that I really wish you had been able to witness it for yourself when you were there.
There's one catch to my story, and it's the reason I'm telling you all of this, because of your story. It's that in all those years that I lived in Florida, and I drove a truck for about ten years there delivering for an auto parts chain with stores just a few miles away from the facility, I never once visited the Space Center. Not for a lack of desire... I've always been a major aviation and space enthusiast. For whatever reason, I just never did make it there for a visit of the complex. I would love to see all of that stuff up close and to see the massive vehicle assembly building. One day, perhaps.
Your comment rekindled these memories and I just thought I'd share them with you. Have a great day.
Thank you for sharing your story, also with the aweful day of January 26 1986. I can't imagine how terrible it must have been to know you actually witnessed the event live. I did see it as well, but on a broadcast, it sent chills down my spine, and even today I feel it inside when thinking about the event, just as september 11. We also visited ground zero (sept 11) on the same vacation, in april 2002 and it was tough to see all the pictures, letters and flowers on the fences surrounding the area.
Just before my brother and I came to Kennedy Space Center we where visiting DC, so of course we had to explore the national space and air museum as well as a trip to Arlington Park to pay our respects at the memorial for the crew of Challenger. (I got some paper pictures that I will try to scan one day from both the Cape, museum and Arlington, and post along with other moments from that vacation)
You must take a trip to the Space Center, it is just stunning, and all the memorbilia they got will certainly impact you. If it still excists, do the VIP tour, it is definatly worth it.
Just as a curiousity, I used to drive longhaul and local delivery with trucks as well :)
Take care, and stay curious :)
/regards JT
What a great trip you and your brother took. I've been told by many people that I should visit the national air and space museum in DC. I now live in Tennessee, and I have a cousin that lives fairly close to DC that I could stay with. I just need to make the time.
Thanks for the response. From one former trucker to another, take care. :)
I had the privilege to visit in sept 02 and watch Atlantis launch. I met some of the Columbia crew too.... forever in my heart
Nobody mentioned that this is a great vid. So I will...... great vid.
it really is a great vid..
djent shred The music and video are a perfect match.
the earth is flat :D
Mike Patton cause you’re the only one with the sentiment..
George Boyd both trash??
I'm here after sls launch yesterday..bring back old memories 🥰🥰
I;m in tears that was beautiful! I have been a fan of the Space Shuttle program since I was 7. I'm 32 now and I still have my Space Shuttle articles that I kept in an old photo album. I even have the article when the Hubble Telescope was placed into orbit.
This is the first time I have seen an on-board shot of the boosters breaking away. SPECTACULAR!!! Hope to stop by sometime I do live in VA Beach.
HOOYAH!
I really miss watching these mammoths take off. They may have been money sponges and not the most practical but they were beautiful in their way. The power!
I wondered that too. According to Wikipedia's article entitled "Space Shuttle", under the "Launch" section:
"At T-minus 10 seconds, hydrogen igniters were activated under each engine bell to quell the stagnant gas inside the cones before ignition. Failure to burn these gases could trip the onboard sensors and create the possibility of an overpressure and explosion of the vehicle during the firing phase."
This is a masterpiece of shuttle launch videos
If they did all the launch vides like that the government would never retire shuttle
R.I.P Discovery
Beautiful! Thank you God for bringing the crew and shuttle 'home' and Thank you for blessing the flight leaders and ground team while they were in orbit.
Hey NASA you certainly posess a HD version of this gorgeous vid.
Yeah wonder if 4k Camera exist in the 90s XD
@@user-bo1ej5im9t good joke man but they used sophisticated 35 and 16 mm flim camera systems which yielded HD Videos in our days.
Motormonkeynl,
The reason they do the rollover sequence is the shuttle passes through the " maximum dynamic pressure zone " where the shuttle is under the most stress when it passes through the sound barrier so they roll over to a " heads down " position to reduce pressure on the shuttle. The shuttle will also reduce the throttle down to 65% & when the shuttle has passes through the maximum dynamic pressure zone it will throttle up to 105%. Hope this helps.
Why is the video quality from 1960's footage so much better?
It almost looks like the srbs are in technical outer space, but their not. There is still enough atmosphere to carry sound.
Very powerful and moving video. Definitely a wonderful clip. This should be shown in every classroom world wide to show the progress of space travel. Hands up for me.
NASA rocks! Thank you for sharing with us your great engineering these past 50 years, my hat goes off to you fellas, job well done!
The tanks outer coating is foam. Long range cameras saw the foam hit the wing. They could not see the leading edge on camera because it was flying away from the camera. Pieces of the panel were recovered that verified it was a hole not a crack.
The space shuttle was the best and worst launch vehicle 😂
What's the first song called? Not sure if it's space walk but I can't find it anywhere.
Sorry, "pilots cabin" is cockpit on english, we just call cockpit slightly different thing (its forward part)
Why did youtube recommend me this 9 years later
Absolutely amazing... The shot at 7:40 when the boosters separate and you can see the shuttle and tank fly away is breathtaking. I don't think we as a species ever thought we'd be able to take that shot. Can't wait to see what the future holds.
@MrElSatan they are little paper covers over the OMS Pod nozzles on the orbiter's nose to prevent water and debris from collecting in there while the orbiter is on the launch pad.
4:44 is truly amazing jaw dropping power. Great music. Best Launch video I have ever seen in my life.
This is amazing!
You mean 4:44
The panel piece was lodged in between the RCC panel and the aluminum spar. There is 1/2 meter of space between them. On orbit in microgravity, the panel piece dislodged and floated away. There was no change of aerodynamics because when it happened the atmosphere was to thin to make a difference.
A tile was fixed near the hatch. It did not have to be fixed. The orbiter lands with a 100 gouges after re-entry with no issues on heat and aerodynamics.
RCC panels are more critical then tiles.
Plasma did destroy the wing during re-entry. On launch there is no plasma because they are not going fast enough. The hole is suggested by pieces of the panel recovered and by a large piece that floated away from the wing on orbit on day two.
@iMensah81 Well then is there a DVD in the works. I would still like to have it for my collection without the crappy youtube compression? I've been flying HD cameras on my rockets for a couple of years now.
I remember STS-1 launch and how brave I thought Commander Young and copilot Crippen were to sit astride those SRBs and that huge fuel tank for the FIRST time. What a ride into the unknown! John Young was the obvious man for the task at the time (very much akin to Armstrong in Apollo 11), a *very* capable and totally cool test pilot and, indeed, Chief of the Astronaut Office.
20yrs ago, I was working NASA QA, and got the opportunity to see everything you're seeing here up close on the service gantry, then 2 weeks later, a nighttime launch of Discovery {STS-82). Of all the things I have seen and done in my life, seeing Discovery in that way, and then the launch at night, ranks near the top of my "Cool" list.
It was always Amazing to me how those brackets on the shuttle to get external tag
It was not the only thing that made it unsafe. Shuttle was the most dangerous manned vehicle ever created. The fact that the crew cabin was inline with the main fuel tank, the fact that it was winged and not a lifting body (winged craft make bad space vehicles because they require Atmospheric orientation). The use of Solid fuel (which can NOT be turned off once started) on a manned rocket and also the cause of the strong vibrations on Shuttle AKA shook of the foam that brought Columbia down.
Great video shame it’s not in hd
4:46 Can’t spell Rocket without Rock
God bless all those who rode the shuttle
She was a good ship...
+Adam Allman She still is. You can see her at the NASM's Udvar-Hazy Center annex at Dulles Airport in Chantilly, VA.
For some reason this was my favorite girl in the fleet.
SOU6900 same here
@@JeffroNoNothing QLQQQLLQLLQLLQLLPLPLPP00L00PL0LL0L0LLL0LLLPPL0LLLQ⁰
@@taivouc7462 what
One small step for man, one giant leap back for mankind.
@Sibs1990 the rockets are the kind of engines wich can run without any external oxidizer (i.e. oxygen): indeed they are used for the space missions because of this capability.
The rockets you see at 7:53 are the Solid Rocket Boosters, wich use a solid propellant, while the shuttle's main engines (the three engines at the bottom of the shuttle) use oxygen and hydrogen, both in a liquid state.
This is the best of the best, the most sincere, the 1st person view of what it takes to launch a space vehicle with over a MILLION MOVING PARTS, and they did it over and over again. THERE IS NOTHING MORE BEAUTIFUL than the STS Missions....PERIOD!!!!!!!
The Soviets did build and launch the Buran shuttle. The difference between that and the US version is that the Soviet shuttle was completely automated and could operate and land without a crew. It was launched only once due to the collapse of the Soviet Union.
I can't believe it's over for good old Disco ...
First comment 10 years ago
We have to show everything to the American people the way it really is, and this is one of the reasons gun whole videos
@TheBayourat A lot of the cameras used for these shots aren't HD cameras as they're too expensive or too weighty to be launched like this. You can get some HD from ground-based cameras and still photos, but that's about it.
I get chills every time I watch a shuttle launch.
Does anybody know what those black circles are at 1:59.
the shuttle was unsafe because there was no way for the crew to eject from the craft in the event of an emergency. Unlike the apollo rockets, where there was a launch escape system to eject the capsule to safety. likewise in space the LEM served as a lifeboat for the crew of apollo 13, granted it was never designed to do so, but at the end of the day, the only way a shuttle crew could be saved in an emergency would be to have another shuttle dock and transfer the crew, which takes time.
What were the tiny air bags? They seemed useless since they blew off in seconds.
@5:01 yeah would love to know what they are for
@@thomaskofod992 read somewhere that they were placed into engines nozzles to prevent birds, incects and other debris getting inside while waiting for launch. After launch pressure change would simply make them inflate and pop out.
@7:44 such a rare view of just the shuttle and the fuel tank heading off towards space without it's SRB's, and i just love the sound the explosive bolts when they release - it's that sound that u know the tank is empty
Applicable for a dream solid type of thing the opportunity is humbly collateral volatile importance of an object.
Very nicely put together video
What song is that they using
I ment, even aerodynamic at launch.. They finally punched a hole. Did they shoot each time in lab on the new element? If not, they might made few cracks and then punch a hole along them.
Plasma would destroy wing internal structure through a hole (not crack) almost immediately. Yaw deviation on reentry would big before plasma, Shuttle control surfaces were not effective enough, and crew detect that even not on manual. There is no sign of this on cockpit docu.
Hole is suggested by the test video.
Music is an absolute shocker
MiG-105 cabin was an integrated to airframe space capsule. XB-58 had the same but w/o ablatives being just supersonic.
I love the pictures but that music is so annoying! I kept forwarding hoping it would stop but then it's back and really distracts from the video.
I'd love to read these studies. Where did you find them? Do you have a link you can post? Thanks.
Folded escape space capsule for eight in cargo bay is affordable, cause it weight much less than conventional. It has nothing more than retrorockets (if you desire to leave shuttle on orbit), heat shield, full-sized or small dragchute and maybe spare breathing oxigen. Anything else is provided by EVA space suit. In an emergency it's possible to launch this separately by small-size rocket in proximity. Or use even few modified ICBM warheads.
Apollo LM took Lunar Geminy sleds as a backup,attached.
i can't wait for Starship launches coming up! the Space Shuttle was flawed for many reasons, hopefully Starship doesn't fail us.
Wenn wir ein Paar wären, wäre das Risiko zu hoch, da wir kein eigenes Umfeld haben.
I miss shuttle launches 🥺
How did they steer this thing, since SRBs don't have gymbals?
Both the SRB's and the orbiters engines gimbal.
Amazing. You can only imagine the true power of the space shuttle form inside the cockpit. This is why i still have the launch om my DVR.
Oh my gosh thank you so much for sharing this.
Do they ever use the duck tail flap
If you put that in perspective, then nothing is safe.
Be it the 747 you are riding, or the car that you're driving anything could go wrong.
Fun fact: More people died on car accidents annually than air accidents or space shuttle accidents combined.
I love Reid Gregory Wiseman and his Family. His Father is beautiful
You're probably really happy now that he was chosen to go on Artemis 2
At 10:29 What was the strut connected to? Because when separated, the surface of the shuttle looked flat...
+Ken Rick was connected to 2 contacts inside the shuttle and next to the 2 hoses from the tank to the shuttle, when they disconnect, the doors slam shut and make a flat surface. for the front strut is a Bolt that is driven into The shuttle. and explosive charge breaks the bolt flush.
Exactly. Excellent explanation.
I've heard about ice. Why foam did? Isn't external tank blanketed?
It was a documented test when they shot in lab and punched a hole. In reality this hole would be visible on launch by ground camera and sufficiently change aerodynamic. Must be crack, eroded then by plasma. Nearly as it was with SRB gap on STS-51-L
Not that I don't believe you, but can you link to these studies? This is a very interesting piece of information.
Shuttle EVA suits are not tethered to the ship with breathing air like the early EVA's. They are independent. Columbia never had a docking module installed. She was too heavy to go to the ISS. If a rescue was to take place 2 shuttles would face each other payload bay to payload bay. The rescue shuttle would have a robot arm that the crew would use to move other crewman up and back using EVA suits. This would take time to get in and out of suits and pre-breathing to go outside.
I miss the Shuttle Era. But I'm looking forward to the next Era with the Commercial Crew Program and Artemis.
@Sibs1990 The engines get liquid Oxygen pumped in with the liquid Hydrogen, which is ignited and pushes the Shuttle on its way. In fact because there is no air in space, rockets work more efficiently than in-atmosphere because the gases can expand very rapidly without opposing pressure.
The ignition of the SRB's is essentially a very controlled explosion, once they ignite they cannot be shut down
This video is so badass!
Two more launches to go after this one.
Those main engines look so whimsical compared to the thundering SRBs. How much thrust do they provide and how much thrust is provided by the SRBs, does anyone know?
Quite a production, I must say.
The first 3 minutes, I was in the mood for, especially.
The middle was so full of overbearing march music, a bit too much in the music department, to me.
Liked the mix of real sound though.
Anyway, thanks for posting this.
I enjoy videos of the Shuttle and other space vehicles.
Would love to take that trip into space, myself.
Werner Von Braun?, He deserves alot of credit but remember that Germany had people visit Goddard's research HQ and they learned some things that definitetly helped to speed-along their rocket program.
The foam doesnt accelerate. The orbiter runs into it. The gouge fixed was on tile.
Earth is SO beautiful looking down at it from space! I’d literally give years off my life to see it from that perspective!!!
Found this in the recommendation section after crew dragon touch down. 😌
Me to
Farewell Discovery, what a incredible machine. You and the space shuttle program will not be forgotten. What a amazing human achievement.
I'll never forget the first Sonic Book I ever heard , which was from Discovery actually. She set of SO many car/house alarms in our neighborhood when she was coming home. It was great :)