What is wrong with this video? Is this put together by AI? What a mess! His name is pronounced three different ways and the editing is all choppy with completely irrelevant images randomly thrown in.
Euler formula is wrong. One side is the exp function which ranges to infinity. Other side is a sum of trig functions each ranging between -1 and 1, ie it's finite. Don't you see the absurdness?
@@msd1531I would say that the concepts that are being conveyed in any discourse of value is more important than a mere mispronounciation of a name or word...nit picking is best done in private....nobody is really interested in the mentality of nit picking...🦧🦧🦧🦧🦧
Statistics was an odd course for me. There were 8 graded papers and tests during the quarter; I flunked the first three, but then I sat down with my dad and the lightbulb came on! I aced the last five tests and rec'd a B in the class.
@@philmanson2991 amazing sir! Mathematics is the only subject where you require passion and dedication, if you understand maths you need nothing else. Thanks to your dad who supported you very well. Keep learning and stay inspired.
A teacher told us abount uncountability. If m and n are 2 real numbers then there are infinite real numbers between them. Since then I was not interested in his classes. While he remained a 'successful' teacher, I soon was to strand in a miserable job, which distanced me away from math. Life is strange.
@@kriscris4001 your teacher wasn't 100% right, which left you in a number mistry. In actual fact, m and n are a real numbers, and in between there may or may not exist some finite integer number but there must be infinite rational number. For eg: 2 and 99 be a m and n, now between them there are 97 integer number, but there are uncountable rational and irrational number i.e 2.5, 87.99, 33.99997, 89.7, 8.99999, 98.88998866644. maths is fun to learn take it easy.
@@kriscris4001 1. rational number are countable, irrational number are uncountable . 2. Between any two integer there are rational as well as irrational number. Above points justifies that between any two integer there are infinite number. There are infinitely many numbers between 2 and 3, including both rational and irrational numbers. Together, the set of rational and irrational numbers between 2 and 3 forms the real numbers in that interval, which is an uncountable infinity.
@Ever_did Yes. That's why I said the teacher had no idea. He said real numbers are uncountable because there are an infinite number of real numbers between any two real numbers. He was wrong.
Terrible music, could not follow the video. Why in a video like this any music at all? Why all these ridiculous film clips of students and teachers which don't have anything to do with Euler and his time?
Is anyone familiar with Euler's work or studying variations of Euler's column studies? ua-cam.com/video/wrBsqiE0vG4/v-deo.htmlsi=waT8lY2iX-wJdjO3 The video and white paper describe the mechanical properties related to my unique variation of Euler's Column studies. They demonstrate how materials (symbolizing fields) naturally react to induced stresses in a "quantized" manner. This process, unlike harmonic oscillators, can lead to the formation of stable structures. The quantized responses closely model the behaviors known as the Quantum Wave Function, as described in modern physics. The effect has been utilized to create lightweight structures and systems for shock mitigation and recoil reduction. The model illustrates the well-known requirement for exponential load increase and the previously unknown collapse of resistance during transition, which leads to a rapid jump to the next energy levels.
@@luamoliveira3467 Actually not, Von Neumann by far most creative, and that is hardest. Creativity is greatest and hardest human intellectual capacity by far. Not to mention great composer who are in my opinion brightest minds of our humanity like Bach, Beethoven, Schubert, Wagner, Brukner, Mahler, etc. Imagine how genius you have to be create works like they did out of nothing! Sit for piano or for paper, and writing musical works like that. My gosh, that talent is another dimension, if God exist he blessed those people with something special, like philosphers too. What type of memory, complex skill, multitasking, knowing theory, and by far hardest creativity you have to have, to be able to write 1200 works like Bach or gigantic and special like Beethoven or Schubert? Schubert wrote 1500 works for just 31 years of age, not to mention what type of masterpieces are those works. Listen just his string quartet no 14. "Death and Maiden" quartet version or Mahler arr. for orchestra. I have great respect for mathematicians because I am a philosopher and many philosophers were great mathematicians themselves, from Thales and Pythagoras, to Leibniz, Descartes, Cantor, Frege, Russell, Quine, Kripke, Patnam and many others, but music, beyond all limits. To quote Nietzsche - "without music, life would be a illusion". Or Beethoven "music is a greater discovery than all philosophy and wisdom combined". All mathematicians, scientists, and artists are sorry, but composers are something special. When you write such contrapuntal masterpieces and so many of them like Bach, or symphonies, sonatas, piano concertos like Beethoven, and others, it is the pinnacle of human intellect. Realistically, every mathematician would rather have been able to write a symphony like 3. 5. 7. not to mention 9. than if he had discovered what he discovered in mathematics. What can you say about Bach, when you listen to his organ works, you feel like a fool. Just learn some of them, it takes you years, not to compose them.
@@fadfsdfasfsa After reading your argument, I realized that you demonstrated a total lack of analytical capacity and in-depth knowledge regarding the works and prolific work done by Gauss during his lifetime. I have read Neumann's entire biography and works, and he probably stands out as the greatest mathematician of the 20th century based on his natural talent, his abilities, and the relevance of his discoveries to the scientific community. However, his mathematical work did not come close to the authentic eccentricity, rigor, depth, capacity for abstraction, and natural talent of Carl Friedrich Gauss in dealing with the treatment of mathematics. His discoveries and his mathematical creation were a true ultimatum of everything more complex that could be unraveled in terms of creativity and depth in the history of mathematics. Most modern experts consider Gauss the most brilliant mathematician of all time based on his achievements.
@@luamoliveira3467 No one changed mathematics in that way, he creates a whole new branch who didnt ever existed before him. Not to mention that actually he createst most important component for our modern computer, and literary made this conversation between us possible, and whole contemporary third revolution. Which is more useful than all discoveries of modern physicists put together. Not to mention that nuclear bomb also could not be made without him, wide knowledge, guy is literary crazy, like Russell or Lebniz, a truth polymath, which is for mathematicians so rare, especially in that capacity, that is not ordinary wide knowledge, he is crazy. Suffice it to say that the professor of Byzantium from Princeton, after a long conversation with him about history, said that Professor Neumann knows more about the history of Byzantium than he who teaches it. What if he hadn't wasted time on everything else and had called more. Some sources say that by the age of nine, he had read most of the books from his father's library, of which only 45 volumes of world history, he has an incredible power of memory, and knows at least eight languages, at the age of 6 he could already speak to his father in ancient Greek, and at the age of 9 he knew German and French as well. Not to mention that he earned his doctorate in parallel with mathematics and chemistry along the way, becoming the youngest private docent in the history of the University of Berlin. No problem, Neumann is a miracle in every sense. And so was the philosopher and logician Saul Kripke, also a Jew, who changed philosophy forever, he proved the completeness theorem for modal logic in his 17th year before entering Harvard. He was also a wunderkind, he started reading Leibniz and Descartes very early, at the age of 13, like Neumann, he was already at the level of a post-doctoral student in mathematics. Also a briliant genius, I recommend his book "Naming and Necessity" which is a collection of three lectures he gave at Princeton in the 70's. He changed philosophy forever, he showed that there are necessary truths a posteriori and contingent truths a priori, which is one of the juice discoveries, since philosophers believed for over two millennia that all a priori truths were necessary, and a posteriori contingent, and no one proved that in the question, which is rare in philosophy. With modal logic, Kripke made a revolution. A true successor to Leibniz.
@@mehdizangiabadi-iw6tn No curve for such equation unless we make one of the constants in the equation an integreable dynamic variable [you can take it from zero (0) to ♾
@@keithdubose2150 nope ( o̴̶̷᷄ ·̫ o̴̶̷̥᷅ ) Leonhard Euler was a Swiss mathematician, physicist, astronomer, geographer, logician, and engineer who founded the studies of graph theory and topology and made pioneering and influential discoveries in many other branches of mathematics such as analytic number theory, complex analysis, and infinitesimal calculus
I apologise for confusion. Actually here says that according to "the female historian" means the writer of history is female not the Leonhard euler. The historian who wrote about Leonhard euler is female. This is because wrongly cited, sorry for same!
I liked it good beginning
@@PORYGON9001 thank you
What is wrong with this video? Is this put together by AI? What a mess! His name is pronounced three different ways and the editing is all choppy with completely irrelevant images randomly thrown in.
But, you know...the diversity!
It is Gauss!!
Absolutely Gauss contribution is more fundamental and deeper than that of Euler
Thanks for the info and sorry for the stupid AI script and production that hasn’t been reviewed and corrected to remove the idiocies. Blessings.
I never knew Euler was trans... You learn something every day.
A mathematician that is expert in tanscendental equations and functions! lol
Euler formula is wrong. One side is the exp function which ranges to infinity. Other side is a sum of trig functions each ranging between -1 and 1, ie it's finite. Don't you see the absurdness?
Narrator cannot pronounce Euler's name consistently (it's "Oiler").
I know today we pronounce it that way, but I actually think the narrator is correct.
@@benjaminvalenzuela3948
ua-cam.com/video/SjWSFBoCCwo/v-deo.html
I stopped watching the video after the first MISpronounced name of the subject (< 30 sec.).
@@msd1531I would say that the concepts that are being conveyed in any discourse of value is more important than a mere mispronounciation of a name or word...nit picking is best done in private....nobody is really interested in the mentality of nit picking...🦧🦧🦧🦧🦧
I have the book
Statistics was an odd course for me. There were 8 graded papers and tests during the quarter; I flunked the first three, but then I sat down with my dad and the lightbulb came on! I aced the last five tests and rec'd a B in the class.
@@philmanson2991 amazing sir!
Mathematics is the only subject where you require passion and dedication, if you understand maths you need nothing else. Thanks to your dad who supported you very well. Keep learning and stay inspired.
The music is too loud.
Thanks for reviewing.
Your review makes us better. We will improve in future videos.
PLEASE! I watched 10 seconds of this nonsense. It is obviously narrated by a machine.
Music is terrible and too loud.
It's almost impossible to listen to over the loud music.
@@jimsimpson1006 apologize for inconvenience
@@Ever_did _ I turned it off after 20 seconds -
I couldn't hear the narrator over the noisy stupid music.
Why do you wreck a good video with music?
@@alpal2002 my bad!
We will do our best in further videos
@@Ever_did - good - how about if you repost this video without the music?
The Riemann zeta function wasn't known to Euler, who was the first to study the zeta function, with only the real numbers.
A teacher told us abount uncountability. If m and n are 2 real numbers then there are infinite real numbers between them. Since then I was not interested in his classes. While he remained a 'successful' teacher, I soon was to strand in a miserable job, which distanced me away from math.
Life is strange.
@@kriscris4001 your teacher wasn't 100% right, which left you in a number mistry. In actual fact, m and n are a real numbers, and in between there may or may not exist some finite integer number but there must be infinite rational number.
For eg: 2 and 99 be a m and n, now between them there are 97 integer number, but there are uncountable rational and irrational number i.e 2.5, 87.99, 33.99997, 89.7, 8.99999, 98.88998866644. maths is fun to learn take it easy.
@Ever_did
Rational numbers are still countable
@@kriscris4001 1. rational number are countable, irrational number are uncountable .
2. Between any two integer there are rational as well as irrational number.
Above points justifies that between any two integer there are infinite number.
There are infinitely many numbers between 2 and 3, including both rational and irrational numbers.
Together, the set of rational and irrational numbers between 2 and 3 forms the real numbers in that interval, which is an uncountable infinity.
@Ever_did Yes. That's why I said the teacher had no idea. He said real numbers are uncountable because there are an infinite number of real numbers between any two real numbers. He was wrong.
@@kriscris4001 in that case he was wrong.
OYE-ler! Not you-ler. And the music is intolerable.
Terrible music, could not follow the video. Why in a video like this any music at all? Why all these ridiculous film clips of students and teachers which don't have anything to do with Euler and his time?
There's some evidence of willful political correctness in those film clips, seemingly in the form of DEI
cant hear the words so I stopped at '36
loving the essential diversity
Agree with other commenters. Terrible concept & production. Content as well seems verbatim from a standard biographical encyclopedia or some such.
I've been thinking (often) that what on earth is that head wear called which Euler has in the picture of him. Does anyone know? Funny looking thing.
It's a dew rag.
How to pronounce Euler sonds like "Oyla":
ua-cam.com/video/SjWSFBoCCwo/v-deo.htmlsi=pV6jchLUTbkYLPce
Female historian? 😮 What is this
@@subhranshushekharpatra7198 narration mistake, it should be that 'according to female historian.....'
This video is very strange!
1^πi
-1=0
Thanks for "trying".
I was wondering if he was female. Soon the narrator described him in masculine pronoun.
😮
"Female historian...."?
If Eu-ler is Oil-er, then why isn't Euclid pronounced Oi-clid !
Because Euler is German, but Euclid is Greek.
Is anyone familiar with Euler's work or studying variations of Euler's column studies?
ua-cam.com/video/wrBsqiE0vG4/v-deo.htmlsi=waT8lY2iX-wJdjO3
The video and white paper describe the mechanical properties related to my unique variation of Euler's Column studies.
They demonstrate how materials (symbolizing fields) naturally react to induced stresses in a "quantized" manner.
This process, unlike harmonic oscillators, can lead to the formation of stable structures.
The quantized responses closely model the behaviors known as the Quantum Wave Function, as described in modern physics.
The effect has been utilized to create lightweight structures and systems for shock mitigation and recoil reduction.
The model illustrates the well-known requirement for exponential load increase and the previously unknown collapse of resistance during transition, which leads to a rapid jump to the next energy levels.
Looks like an ad for DEI.
Random stock images.
Only Gauss .
Von Neumann better then both
@@fadfsdfasfsaGauss is another level, better than Neumann and most impressive.
@@luamoliveira3467 Actually not, Von Neumann by far most creative, and that is hardest. Creativity is greatest and hardest human intellectual capacity by far. Not to mention great composer who are in my opinion brightest minds of our humanity like Bach, Beethoven, Schubert, Wagner, Brukner, Mahler, etc. Imagine how genius you have to be create works like they did out of nothing! Sit for piano or for paper, and writing musical works like that. My gosh, that talent is another dimension, if God exist he blessed those people with something special, like philosphers too.
What type of memory, complex skill, multitasking, knowing theory, and by far hardest creativity you have to have, to be able to write 1200 works like Bach or gigantic and special like Beethoven or Schubert? Schubert wrote 1500 works for just 31 years of age, not to mention what type of masterpieces are those works. Listen just his string quartet no 14. "Death and Maiden" quartet version or Mahler arr. for orchestra.
I have great respect for mathematicians because I am a philosopher and many philosophers were great mathematicians themselves, from Thales and Pythagoras, to Leibniz, Descartes, Cantor, Frege, Russell, Quine, Kripke, Patnam and many others, but music, beyond all limits. To quote Nietzsche - "without music, life would be a illusion". Or Beethoven "music is a greater discovery than all philosophy and wisdom combined".
All mathematicians, scientists, and artists are sorry, but composers are something special. When you write such contrapuntal masterpieces and so many of them like Bach, or symphonies, sonatas, piano concertos like Beethoven, and others, it is the pinnacle of human intellect. Realistically, every mathematician would rather have been able to write a symphony like 3. 5. 7. not to mention 9. than if he had discovered what he discovered in mathematics. What can you say about Bach, when you listen to his organ works, you feel like a fool. Just learn some of them, it takes you years, not to compose them.
@@fadfsdfasfsa After reading your argument, I realized that you demonstrated a total lack of analytical capacity and in-depth knowledge regarding the works and prolific work done by Gauss during his lifetime. I have read Neumann's entire biography and works, and he probably stands out as the greatest mathematician of the 20th century based on his natural talent, his abilities, and the relevance of his discoveries to the scientific community. However, his mathematical work did not come close to the authentic eccentricity, rigor, depth, capacity for abstraction, and natural talent of Carl Friedrich Gauss in dealing with the treatment of mathematics. His discoveries and his mathematical creation were a true ultimatum of everything more complex that could be unraveled in terms of creativity and depth in the history of mathematics. Most modern experts consider Gauss the most brilliant mathematician of all time based on his achievements.
@@luamoliveira3467 No one changed mathematics in that way, he creates a whole new branch who didnt ever existed before him. Not to mention that actually he createst most important component for our modern computer, and literary made this conversation between us possible, and whole contemporary third revolution. Which is more useful than all discoveries of modern physicists put together. Not to mention that nuclear bomb also could not be made without him, wide knowledge, guy is literary crazy, like Russell or Lebniz, a truth polymath, which is for mathematicians so rare, especially in that capacity, that is not ordinary wide knowledge, he is crazy.
Suffice it to say that the professor of Byzantium from Princeton, after a long conversation with him about history, said that Professor Neumann knows more about the history of Byzantium than he who teaches it. What if he hadn't wasted time on everything else and had called more.
Some sources say that by the age of nine, he had read most of the books from his father's library, of which only 45 volumes of world history, he has an incredible power of memory, and knows at least eight languages, at the age of 6 he could already speak to his father in ancient Greek, and at the age of 9 he knew German and French as well. Not to mention that he earned his doctorate in parallel with mathematics and chemistry along the way, becoming the youngest private docent in the history of the University of Berlin. No problem, Neumann is a miracle in every sense. And so was the philosopher and logician Saul Kripke, also a Jew, who changed philosophy forever, he proved the completeness theorem for modal logic in his 17th year before entering Harvard. He was also a wunderkind, he started reading Leibniz and Descartes very early, at the age of 13, like Neumann, he was already at the level of a post-doctoral student in mathematics. Also a briliant genius, I recommend his book "Naming and Necessity" which is a collection of three lectures he gave at Princeton in the 70's. He changed philosophy forever, he showed that there are necessary truths a posteriori and contingent truths a priori, which is one of the juice discoveries, since philosophers believed for over two millennia that all a priori truths were necessary, and a posteriori contingent, and no one proved that in the question, which is rare in philosophy. With modal logic, Kripke made a revolution. A true successor to Leibniz.
Let pi = u , ||e^(iu) + 1 = 0, note i^2 = -1 || e^(iu) = -1 || e^(iu) = i^2 || -1 = -1 || f(i) = e^(iu) - i^2 || f'(i) = u*e^(iu) - 2i || f"(i) = u^2*e^(iu) - 2 || u^2 *e^(iu) - 2 = 0 || u^2 - 2 = 0 || u^2 = 2 || u = 2^(1/2) || (2^(1/2))^2 * e^(i*[2^(1/2)]^2) - 2 = 0 || r_1^(2)* e^(i*r_1^(2)) - 2 = 0
What's curve e^-(πi)+1 ,e, 0,e
@@mehdizangiabadi-iw6tn No curve for such equation unless we make one of the constants in the equation an integreable dynamic variable [you can take it from zero (0) to ♾
Female historian?
@@keithdubose2150 nope ( o̴̶̷᷄ ·̫ o̴̶̷̥᷅ )
Leonhard Euler was a Swiss mathematician, physicist, astronomer, geographer, logician, and engineer who founded the studies of graph theory and topology and made pioneering and influential discoveries in many other branches of mathematics such as analytic number theory, complex analysis, and infinitesimal calculus
@@Ever_did I know... the voice keeps saying female historian? Some failed to check the narration.. dislike and unfollow
I apologise for confusion.
Actually here says that according to "the female historian" means the writer of history is female not the Leonhard euler. The historian who wrote about Leonhard euler is female.
This is because wrongly cited, sorry for same!
Do not waste your time with this mess!