Answer to the question from a Std 10 student on work and energy

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 сер 2024
  • In lifting an object through a height, the work by the person and by the gravity cancel out. Still the potential energy increases. Discussion on kinetic, potential and internal energy.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 605

  • @AdityaRaj-xo3hn
    @AdityaRaj-xo3hn 9 місяців тому +170

    Respected Sir, your one reply will be moment to remember for a lifetime & will also act as a source of motivation for this young NEET aspirant !

  • @premsagarpremsagar3840
    @premsagarpremsagar3840 9 місяців тому +103

    Kitne log mante hai ki HC sir India ke sabse knowledgeable physics teacher hai ?❤❤❤
    👇

    • @ytg6663
      @ytg6663 9 місяців тому +7

      Me while watching video - 🙂
      Me while seeing your comment - 🙄

    • @premsagarpremsagar3840
      @premsagarpremsagar3840 9 місяців тому

      @@ytg6663 are kahana kya chahte ho?

    • @ytg6663
      @ytg6663 9 місяців тому +8

      @@premsagarpremsagar3840 Yhi ki Likes ki bheek maag kar kya milta hai

    • @premsagarpremsagar3840
      @premsagarpremsagar3840 9 місяців тому

      @@ytg6663 yaar Bhai ek alag hi sukun milta hai 😂

    • @premsagarpremsagar3840
      @premsagarpremsagar3840 9 місяців тому

      @@ytg6663 yaar agar aapko koi dikkat hai to bolo main abhi comment delete kar dunga

  • @gunjanmishra1080
    @gunjanmishra1080 9 місяців тому +698

    A new lesson... No question is a simple question. It depends upon our perspective.

    • @ytg6663
      @ytg6663 9 місяців тому +39

      Depends on Knowledge and experience

    • @hcverma2928
      @hcverma2928  9 місяців тому +273

      yes.

    • @sejalarora2723
      @sejalarora2723 9 місяців тому +14

      So true. Each time we take it easy, he proves us wrong!

    • @user-cah036
      @user-cah036 9 місяців тому

      ​@@hcverma2928Sir ,i am Harshit, - to deal with the problem of Dual nature of light , I discover '' Morse-code model of Light '' ,this model proof "non monochromatic" nature of light. and this model is also explain "Radiation effect" . this model explain clearly ,why does Light "Diffract" . sir please pay attention to my model, it can help in physics.

    • @puneetbajaj786
      @puneetbajaj786 9 місяців тому +9

      ​@@hcverma2928sir i have a question if light is an em wave then it had electric field and as range of electric field is infinite, it should interact with particles at infinite distance from it's line of propagation, but it is not possible with particle nature. Does light do the same or not, if no then why

  • @jmusic5895
    @jmusic5895 9 місяців тому +32

    I wish we had a good teacher like you.
    You are a great teacher.

    • @teamf4xhades379
      @teamf4xhades379 9 місяців тому

      He wrote a book for jee mains

    • @jmusic5895
      @jmusic5895 9 місяців тому

      @@teamf4xhades379 I knew it.physics book of HC Verma sir,,famous book

    • @Some___loner
      @Some___loner 6 місяців тому

      alakh pandey is there for you

  • @m8rtia9
    @m8rtia9 9 місяців тому +22

    In short what I learnt is, PE is stored in a system due to its interactions internally. If the charges are opposite and are left alone, they will expend this energy and accelerate towards each other. And same with block and earth.

    • @youthug6851
      @youthug6851 7 місяців тому +2

      Is it true for elastic potential energy to

  • @Vinod_DeshBhakat
    @Vinod_DeshBhakat 8 місяців тому +27

    I am so blessed that I read HC Verma physics when i prepare for jee mains. 😊😊😊 Thanks 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏 sir you are Kohinoor 😊😊 for us .

  • @salmanhaleem4280
    @salmanhaleem4280 5 місяців тому +3

    If people teach their subjects like Verma Saheb, then every subject would be full of fun and enjoyment. I have never seen someone like him inject so much passion into his work as he did. Mashallah. I watch his lesson like an interesting movie scene. He knows how to convert the most difficult concept into a piece of cake.

    • @positive1061
      @positive1061 5 місяців тому

      Can you explain this to me. I don't understand Hindi

  • @S_sOs_S
    @S_sOs_S 9 місяців тому +7

    and as a realtime case, as the person lifting object is standing on Earth, he lifts the mass from groud to height 'h', so for the 3-body system: person, object and Earth, the net energy of system doesn't change.
    For a two body system (Object and Earth), the energy of this system increases by 'mgh' as the work is done on an external agent on the system. The potential energy of system/object increases to mgh while change in potential energy of Earth is negligible or zero.

  • @v.vishwa800
    @v.vishwa800 9 місяців тому +22

    This type questions are put on that mind those BOYS always feel PHYSICS .
    👍

    • @ritkkumar865
      @ritkkumar865 9 місяців тому +2

      Every simple question in a physics is very complicated 🙂

  • @dataman17
    @dataman17 8 місяців тому +8

    Sir Resoect to you for your books!!! Never made life easier than a simpler language from yours.

  • @AbhishekVerma-bz2kr
    @AbhishekVerma-bz2kr 9 місяців тому +123

    I understood from this video that it is very important to decide the system while applying work energy theorem. Moreover for potential energy which is especially conceptualised for conservative field should also be taken care. Generally people say work done = change in Kinetic energy but work done by whom? Remains unknown unless we specify the force which is responsible for work done. Thank you HC Verma Sir ❤.

    • @hcverma2928
      @hcverma2928  9 місяців тому +38

      good.

    • @user-cah036
      @user-cah036 9 місяців тому +4

      ​@@hcverma2928Sir ,i am Harshit, - to deal with the problem of Dual nature of light , I discover '' Morse-code model of Light '' ,this model proof "non monochromatic" nature of light. and this model is also explain "Radiation effect" . this model explain clearly ,why does Light "Diffract" . sir please pay attention to my model, it can help in physics.

    • @aryanaman7
      @aryanaman7 9 місяців тому +2

      @@user-cah036 whats the radiation effect? and all the properties of light are already well explained, and btw literally everything has dual nature, what will you do to explain dual nature of just light?

    • @sauravhere...
      @sauravhere... 9 місяців тому

      ​@@aryanaman7Sir work done on the system means we can say if work is done on any of the particles of the system and if so still net work done becomes zero , gravity and external force acts on the same block opposite to each other 😅 please explain

    • @pritamyadav17
      @pritamyadav17 9 місяців тому +2

      @@sauravhere... if you have earth and block to be one system then you cannot take gravity as external force albeit it becomes internal force..
      Sir had clearly said in this video .Watch again!

  • @NaveenKashyap-lu9me
    @NaveenKashyap-lu9me 9 місяців тому +3

    Sir main apko apne gurujii manta hu you are vey very excellent teacher of physic.

  • @ayush9224
    @ayush9224 9 місяців тому +82

    sir please take lectures from class 6th to 12th as a lot of people have fear from physics but if you teach them then definately it is so benificial for them

  • @NitishRaj
    @NitishRaj 8 місяців тому +12

    Sir, I remember, in 2003 Deb Mukherjee sir taught me the same in his krishna Apartment basement. Heard you two were collegues in science college. Regards Nitish Raj, Scientist at DRDO

    • @abhinavsaini3512
      @abhinavsaini3512 13 днів тому

      Hello sir what do I have to do to become scientist at DRDO, I am currently in class 11 and studying for JEE

  • @KundanSoni-fz5mq
    @KundanSoni-fz5mq 8 місяців тому +5

    Number 1physics teachers of all time 👍👍

    • @shibhanlalpandita6975
      @shibhanlalpandita6975 8 місяців тому

      Search latest tweets of @lal_shiban
      Click & go to pinned tweet.
      It's a question paper 📜
      No Hindu professor could reply.
      Now ask Sir to solve Q 5 & 11
      Right!

    • @KundanSoni-fz5mq
      @KundanSoni-fz5mq 8 місяців тому

      @@shibhanlalpandita6975 Sir ,ye tweets Mai kaha pe dekhu ??please tell!

  • @uzairhussain4856
    @uzairhussain4856 8 місяців тому +4

    It can be also understood as follows. Positive work done on a particle increases the kinetic energy of particle. Negetive work done removes that kinetic energy and converts it into potential energy.

  • @dusasandas5854
    @dusasandas5854 9 місяців тому +1

    Sir your smile makes concepts of physics as a piece of cake. It tastes very sweet after understanding...

  • @AdityaJee-us1pq
    @AdityaJee-us1pq 9 місяців тому +117

    Sir, I thank you very much for this amazing lecture. I still cannot believe that I just met you a few weeks ago when you were in Jaipur, at the Jaipur National University. There, I secured 2nd position in the quiz, and was awarded by you. Sir, thank you for everything. Due to all the hecticness, I was not able to talk to you, but I just want to say, that you and your fellow teachers have again sparked a joy for science and maths, which I had as a child, but lost it due to competition. Thank you sir ❤ 🙏🙏

    • @hcverma2928
      @hcverma2928  9 місяців тому +43

      Very nice. All the best.

    • @AdityaJee-us1pq
      @AdityaJee-us1pq 9 місяців тому +3

      ​@@hcverma2928Thank you sir🙏🙏❤❤🥺

    • @Vlog-tg8bu
      @Vlog-tg8bu 9 місяців тому

      congt bro
      @@AdityaJee-us1pq

  • @man-e9430
    @man-e9430 9 місяців тому +11

    Thank you sir ❤ your teaching your books and everything you have done for us 🙏 helps me so much in studying 😊

  • @butasinghgill3365
    @butasinghgill3365 9 місяців тому +1

    0:03 amit kumar ji........
    Hats off to the God of physics.

  • @Sumit07864
    @Sumit07864 9 місяців тому +6

    Internal energy doesn't shows any change due to not change in temperature of particle
    Kinetic energy doesn't show any changes because velocity of block is same
    Potential get change because we took it up from a position to height H
    Truely Legend of his subject we had honour to have luck to seek guidance of sir @HC Verma
    If we only consider the block change there is no work because mgh + - mgh cancel out each other but if we consider both block and earth potential energy with external force applied by a body the system potential energy will increase with mgh and the work done will happen

  • @aryendrasinghparihar6940
    @aryendrasinghparihar6940 9 місяців тому +12

    Happy Diwali, sir you are the inspiration for youth that being a BSC student you can rock in your life

  • @counterpoint9260
    @counterpoint9260 8 місяців тому

    HC Verma, thanks for making the globe your virtual class audience..cheers to power of internet and youtube

  • @ADITYA77710
    @ADITYA77710 9 місяців тому +3

    happy diwali sir, i will give my JEE exam in 2k25 all i want is blessing from you

  • @yashsoni7825
    @yashsoni7825 9 місяців тому +15

    Sir why voltage remains same and in parallel connection of wires where as current differs why ?

    • @mukulupadhyay4656
      @mukulupadhyay4656 9 місяців тому +5

      Imagine a water pipe with water flowing through it. If there is a section where the pipe is in parallel, the water should split up and flow into the three different pipes in parallel. Similarly, current divides into the three wires in parallel, maintaining a consistent pressure (voltage) across all branches.

    • @devanshverma2948
      @devanshverma2948 9 місяців тому

      Mukul, This is an example. Please give more credible and detailed answer.

    • @Java_Ram_जवा_राम
      @Java_Ram_जवा_राम 9 місяців тому +2

      Because all the branches in the connection have same starting and ending point, so all will have same potential difference and so the voltage

    • @meIanchoIia
      @meIanchoIia 9 місяців тому +2

      Potential difference across the two junction points is same.. irrespective the current diverges or not

    • @IITGuwahati576
      @IITGuwahati576 9 місяців тому +1

      In parallel combination, the end points are same. Hence, the potential difference between the two end points remain same.

  • @Prince.....k
    @Prince.....k 9 місяців тому +4

    I really appreciate your each lessons sir....❤

  • @user-zy5si2nd4z
    @user-zy5si2nd4z 9 місяців тому +3

    This video makes my concept clear
    Thank you sir 🙏🏻🙏🏻

  • @sventuscano8773
    @sventuscano8773 8 місяців тому +4

    Excellent video as always ❤

  • @anubhavjaiswal8955
    @anubhavjaiswal8955 9 місяців тому +4

    Just wow 😮
    What a concept clearty
    Wow wow and wow
    Thank u so much sir

    • @positive1061
      @positive1061 5 місяців тому

      Please explain to me. I don't understand Hindi.

  • @mirirshad2022
    @mirirshad2022 8 місяців тому

    This is amazing!!
    Entirely different concept abt. P.E and so precisely explained.

  • @rahil136
    @rahil136 6 місяців тому

    That is why i love professor hc verma even i am doing bsc anaesthesia but still reads concept of physics by hc Verma sir ❤❤ no one is like professor hc verma the way sir has explained michelaon Morley fringe experiment was magnitude hc Verma sir is father of physics ❤

  • @pri012
    @pri012 9 місяців тому +2

    Ye baat baar bhul jaata hu ki potential energy system ke liye defined hai...thnx!😊(class 12)

  • @deoscienceclasses7530
    @deoscienceclasses7530 6 місяців тому

    According to Ohm’s Law, Current is directly proportional to the Potential Difference, but in case of Alternative Current, why the current is inversely proportional to Potential Difference.
    Why there is contradiction between two expressions:-
    (i)Ohm’s Law:- Current(I) directly proportional to Voltage(V)
    But in case of Alternative Current, why the Current is inversely proportional to the Potential difference, due to which energy loss is minimized during the transmission of AC Current at such high voltage(11kV)
    i.e., Power(P) directly proportional to Current(I) and Voltage(V)
    =>P=VI
    =>I=P/V

  • @ghoul5852
    @ghoul5852 9 місяців тому

    we use + and - as directions also like - is opposite direction and + is with the direction{here direction of force applied by you on the body}

  • @Anshi-ub6zy
    @Anshi-ub6zy 9 місяців тому +1

    Thanks sir
    Is video se Kitna concept clear ho gye

  • @Lets_Learn_Together108
    @Lets_Learn_Together108 6 місяців тому

    Potential energy is of a system (earth + mass ). Therefore, the work done by the gravity , which is. Not an external force, is. OT being considered. Thank you sir

  • @ani-sasuke-me_way7.
    @ani-sasuke-me_way7. 8 місяців тому +2

    Thank you so much for amazing and interesting lecture.

  • @arvindkk27989
    @arvindkk27989 7 місяців тому +1

    Separate fan base for professor's smile

  • @mohammadrafee3314
    @mohammadrafee3314 8 місяців тому

    Sir, you are heart of India. You are indigenous physicist.
    🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

  • @rajatpandey4215
    @rajatpandey4215 4 місяці тому

    Respect sr
    Aapka bhut dhanyawad
    Jo aapne utube ke madhyam se apna knowledge share Kiya 😊
    निवेदन h
    Ki आप 9/10/11/12
    क्लास की physics Hindi me
    Btae taki Jo bachhe padhna chahte h
    Aur sahi direction nhi pa rhe h
    Unhe real physics padhne ko mile
    Dhanyawad,,✍️🙏🙏🙏

  • @atgc2370
    @atgc2370 8 місяців тому +1

    Any question's level can be determined when a person with known intellectual prowess is dealing with that question..Simply put, it depends on the person who is dealing with that question.

  • @VinayMore-of5qm
    @VinayMore-of5qm 9 місяців тому +3

    sir I have two questions
    1)if light has no mass then why it is attracted by the blackhole?
    2)std 8th sse padhaya jata hai ki electron nucleus ke around circular orbit me motion krte hai but ek orbit me toh multiple electron hoge ,so internal repulsion ki vajh se circularr motion kaise possible hai and actual motion and path kya hai electron ka??

  • @chandansinghism
    @chandansinghism 9 місяців тому

    Other way to think work done by normal force when you lift the block which will be in direction of movement of the block and we know that since block is not accelerating Normal is equal to mg.

  • @sukanyasinha48
    @sukanyasinha48 9 місяців тому +1

    System 1: When earth and block different systems.
    No net change in energy in the block when we lift it up because work done by gravity and work done by us cancel each out. Potential energy of the block will depend on the square of distance between the centre of block and centre of the earth.
    System 2: When earth and block both are 1 unit. Then net energy of the block is +mgh only (not -ve) because the external force acting on it is acting away from the unit (both earth and block). And work done by gravity is not considered because "resultant (or net) energy of a body is the sum of external forces acting on it." But since we considered earth and block as 1 unit, work done by gravity is an internal force, so we ignore it.
    I hope I can explain it correctly :)

    • @cuterancesama628
      @cuterancesama628 9 місяців тому

      Well if you used " us" then there are 3 bodies total(earth human block) and you forgot to consider normal

    • @sukanyasinha48
      @sukanyasinha48 9 місяців тому

      @@cuterancesama628 "us" means that external force that causes motion in the block.
      What do u mean by "normal" ?

    • @cuterancesama628
      @cuterancesama628 9 місяців тому

      @@sukanyasinha48 I meant normal force.
      Let's say a man is holding a block on his hand and here 1. Gravitational force is applied 2. To cancel out that force a normal force from hand is applied to it .
      3. A additional force my man is required to move the block up

    • @AS-fo3ew
      @AS-fo3ew 9 місяців тому

      ​@@cuterancesama628 That system 3 of yours (where you are also taking normal force) will also cancel out.

    • @cuterancesama628
      @cuterancesama628 9 місяців тому

      @@AS-fo3ew I never said what he is saying is wrong. I thought that forces are not adding up, just reminded him

  • @mbfoundation996
    @mbfoundation996 7 місяців тому +1

    Mechanical energy will always remain same
    As we take the block above the ground potential energy increase while kinetic energy decreases
    As, mechanical energy = P. E. + K. N.

  • @jassyrathore8394
    @jassyrathore8394 9 місяців тому +8

    vgerh vgerh vgerh vgerh is more knowledgeable than many so called physics teacher's😂

  • @blackbox330
    @blackbox330 8 місяців тому

    Sir, Great video. Interesting question. Very well explained.

  • @user-tj2fr3zv4j
    @user-tj2fr3zv4j 9 місяців тому +8

    hello sir I m a student of class 11th currently and I really like the theory of the your book sir,thank you so much for sir😇😇

  • @suddhasattasaha4793
    @suddhasattasaha4793 8 місяців тому +1

    My question is " Does a charge undergoing acceleration within a gravitational field emit radiation? " I have been thinking about this situation for quite some time since my 11th grade and could not come up with any possible answer. I have also asked this to many physics teachers and professors but could not get a satisfactory response. According to classical electromagnetism, an accelerating charge emits electromagnetic radiation. However this scenario touches upon the intersection of two fundamental theories in physics-electromagnetism and general relativity.

    • @CoyBoyRoy
      @CoyBoyRoy 3 місяці тому

      yes. it would emit radiation. why do you think it won't?

  • @nitink8148
    @nitink8148 9 місяців тому

    Check all the videos and correct me if you can find a straight forward reply for any question.?

    • @cuterancesama628
      @cuterancesama628 9 місяців тому

      Physics Mai masters bhi karloge toh bhi direct answer nahi de paoge .
      Sir sab cases ko baatake case ke hisab se sabse sahi answer dete hai.

  • @Quotes.G
    @Quotes.G 9 місяців тому +5

    Thank you very much sir for motivating me to study physics in a new way👍🏼
    Sirji please make a video on how to study physics in a good way?

  • @surajgupta7888
    @surajgupta7888 9 місяців тому +9

    Thank you sir for your Lessons on Physics, Sir please upload a course on General Theory Of Relativity for Beginners 🙏🙏

  • @rochakeducation
    @rochakeducation 9 місяців тому

    a message from rochak
    seriously sir love to see your videos Sir ! High Respect Sir

  • @Rk.751
    @Rk.751 9 місяців тому +2

    Beautiful hair style

  • @santoshjha8092
    @santoshjha8092 9 місяців тому

    This is very underated channel

  • @mathsstudy9957
    @mathsstudy9957 9 місяців тому +4

    Fantastic explanation sir please
    Keep uploading this type of videos its really helpful for us ❤

    • @hcverma2928
      @hcverma2928  9 місяців тому +1

      Thank you, I will

    • @dhruvbhola9073
      @dhruvbhola9073 9 місяців тому

      @@hcverma2928 its very inspiring to hear u sir

  • @ytg6663
    @ytg6663 9 місяців тому +2

    बचपन में फिजिक्स में मेरा बहुत इंटरेस्ट था IIT Clear कर सकता था लेकिन अच्छे टीचर न मिलने के कारण मैं कम्पटीशन नहीं निकाल पाया 🙂🙂 और कैमिस्ट्री वाले ट्यूशन के लिए लूटते थे 🙂🙂

  • @alternateaccount4868
    @alternateaccount4868 9 місяців тому

    Wish you were on UA-cam back when I was in school

  • @chotku
    @chotku 9 місяців тому +1

    गुरुजी प्रणाम स्वीकार करें 🙏🙏

  • @user-or2cf2eb5d
    @user-or2cf2eb5d 9 місяців тому +1

    I understand by this video that we should not take Questions simply we should try to answer that question . I depends on how we do

  • @user-kf5lj1rp9r
    @user-kf5lj1rp9r 7 місяців тому +1

    Genious

  • @dsaxena91
    @dsaxena91 9 місяців тому

    Kya anand mein hain sir. I wish our maths and physics teachers were like you.

    • @the_escapeder1129
      @the_escapeder1129 9 місяців тому

      Bhai paper Aisa conceptual ayega pass hona bhi mushkil hojeyga fir school bhi😅

  • @Awadhesh16
    @Awadhesh16 9 місяців тому +21

    Sir I wanna ask a question
    Does current depends on frame of reference ?
    According to formula
    I=neAVd
    Vd is drift velocity
    so let's take a hypothetical situation where a particle is placed near a current carrying wire which is moving such that relative velocity of particle relative to e+( for this situation consider that positron moves because I'm not able to explain this with electron) is zero so in the frame of reference of particle current(according to this formula) should be zero
    so there is a confusion for me sir please reply
    We didn't talk talk about this in 11th & 12th currently I'm in my drop year

    • @govindprajapat5261
      @govindprajapat5261 9 місяців тому +8

      No, if electron from one frame of reference is at rest then kernels (positive ion of metal, which is actually at rest as seen from ground) will be seemed to move in backward direction so that's why in that frame kernels will create current. Hope I answered what you asked.

    • @Awadhesh16
      @Awadhesh16 9 місяців тому +2

      ​@@govindprajapat5261ya I got that thanks😊

    • @govindprajapat5261
      @govindprajapat5261 9 місяців тому

      @@Awadhesh16 My pleasure!

    • @Awadhesh16
      @Awadhesh16 9 місяців тому

      @@govindprajapat5261 aap konsi class mein hai?

    • @govindprajapat5261
      @govindprajapat5261 9 місяців тому +1

      @@Awadhesh16 I am also in drop year

  • @arpitadarsh5856
    @arpitadarsh5856 9 місяців тому +1

    your smile is awsome sir

  • @UrmilaDevi-pp6yi
    @UrmilaDevi-pp6yi 9 місяців тому

    Sir you are best I wish I would have got teachers like you In class 10

  • @_your_dad_thor
    @_your_dad_thor 7 місяців тому

    Sir Goodreads... This is Abhishek Chaturvedi, student of class 10th ICSE.... There is a confusion that, when a stone tied with a string is spin. What force acts on hand ... Some says Centripetal force even my physics teacher and senior teaches.. but I think it's reaction of Tension in string only.. please concer my request and clear the doubt

  • @sarfarazsarkar7551
    @sarfarazsarkar7551 5 місяців тому

    oh sir i have no shame to say that never thought why its +mgh when net work on the body is zero but today as u explained i got it thank you sirrr and when we say it has mgh its when we are ext agent and earth and body is system and when if we only see body then no change in its KE and net work is also zero and potential has not yet came into picture got a new lesson thnx lot

  • @DeepakParmar-th2gw
    @DeepakParmar-th2gw 7 місяців тому +1

    Namashkar sir
    I am Deepak ,(class 11th)
    Sir jab hum ik ball ko horizontally ghumate hai apne upar jo ki string se bandhi hue hai to jab wo Puri tarah straight ho jati hai tab tention ko to mrw²balance kar leta hai lekin us samay gravitational force ko konsa force balance karta hai jisse wo ball niche nahi aati

  • @yashinmars
    @yashinmars 9 місяців тому +1

    Sir i have a doubt
    We know that work done by magnetic is always zero as the displacement is perpendicular to force by magnetic field, we can say it doesn't depends on the path it moved on which shows conservative nature
    So, why do we say magnetic field is non conservative in nature.
    Sir pls pick my question, u r my inspiration in life and thank you.

  • @RamSingh-zs8ne
    @RamSingh-zs8ne 9 місяців тому

    I like physics just like your hairstyle sir❤

  • @ajaygujjar3498
    @ajaygujjar3498 9 місяців тому +1

    When we Put the water in the vacuum or in the space the water is not boil according to the definition of boiling point the vapour pressure of a liquid is equal to the atmospheric pressure so liquid will boil so in the vacuum atmosphere pressure is zero and liquid vapour pressure is also zero when we put the liquid or water in the vacuum why water is not boil ?

    • @pri012
      @pri012 9 місяців тому +1

      Because vacuum has no temperature.

  • @eduworld547
    @eduworld547 9 місяців тому +1

    Guruji, Pranam Nepal se. 🇳🇵 ❤

  • @KaranSirInfoTech
    @KaranSirInfoTech 8 місяців тому

    Great Explanation Guruji...

  • @ShivanandkMagadum-th9uh
    @ShivanandkMagadum-th9uh 7 місяців тому

    ∆U=Work done by conservative force
    From alakh sir

  • @anisrahamn160
    @anisrahamn160 9 місяців тому +2

    Would be a great advisor in astrophysics field.

  • @rishikeshvibhute8222
    @rishikeshvibhute8222 9 місяців тому +8

    Wonderful as always

    • @hcverma2928
      @hcverma2928  9 місяців тому +3

      Thank you so much 😀

  • @surajgupta7888
    @surajgupta7888 9 місяців тому +1

    Sir aapki kahani ka part-28 bhi upload krdijiye😊

  • @vijayrohilla9991
    @vijayrohilla9991 9 місяців тому +1

    Sir 🙏🙏
    Naman h apko

  • @ThePoliticalHistorian
    @ThePoliticalHistorian 9 місяців тому +5

    Pranam Sir🙏🙏

  • @vaishnavisoni4106
    @vaishnavisoni4106 9 місяців тому +4

    Very nicely explain this question sir
    Thankyou sir🙏🏻

    • @hcverma2928
      @hcverma2928  9 місяців тому +2

      Most welcome

    • @user-cah036
      @user-cah036 9 місяців тому

      ​@@hcverma2928Sir ,i am Harshit, - to deal with the problem of Dual nature of light , I discover '' Morse-code model of Light '' ,this model proof "non monochromatic" nature of light. and this model is also explain "Radiation effect" . this model explain clearly ,why does Light "Diffract" . sir please pay attention to my model, it can help in physics.

  • @Monojeetroy04
    @Monojeetroy04 9 місяців тому +3

    Happy Diwali sir ☺
    Amazing video😇❤

  • @Nitinrathore001
    @Nitinrathore001 9 місяців тому +1

    Sir agar koi mass earth per ho to bo mg force nice ki oor aggta h to use force ko balance karne earth mass per Normal force lagati to jab hum mass to uotayege to mg force ko balance karne ke liyehum ko mg force lgana padega kyuki mass earth ke contect me nhi h and upper legane ke liye exta force lagana padega na❤ explain kardigiye na sir please

  • @user-ml6fz8ds7e
    @user-ml6fz8ds7e 9 місяців тому +1

    Thanking you sir for this wonderful concept ❤
    Your teaching is wonderful as always

  • @DeepakKumar-ih8cf
    @DeepakKumar-ih8cf 7 місяців тому

    Living legend. Hcv sir❤

  • @user-si8ts8cm9y
    @user-si8ts8cm9y 8 місяців тому +1

    Why does an object moves upwards when it is rotated with acceleration relative to the vertical line?

  • @pasgaming5276
    @pasgaming5276 9 місяців тому

    Thnx sir mera doubt bhi tha ab solve hua

  • @devanshsaxena7072
    @devanshsaxena7072 9 місяців тому +1

    QUESTION --->Assume a normal circuit, if we increase the voltage in the circuit, would the energy carried by each mobile electron increase or rate of no of electrons flowing through a cross section at an instance increase?
    (Also if one is correct then why the other is wrong)

    • @nikhilhadbe271
      @nikhilhadbe271 9 місяців тому

      Second is correct, as due to ohm's law , don't know about 1st one

    • @bones1252
      @bones1252 9 місяців тому

      V=IR,R= constant,
      V depend on I
      I=Q/T,if t=constant,
      I depend on Q
      Q=ne
      V directly proportional to n(no. of electron)

    • @nikhilhadbe271
      @nikhilhadbe271 9 місяців тому

      Oh yeah I remembered current= neAV so yeah velocity also increases

  • @basically-ky2rp
    @basically-ky2rp 9 місяців тому

    Thank you from deep of my heart ❤️

  • @amarnathbhar9529
    @amarnathbhar9529 2 місяці тому

    Sir, please make a video on different forces and torque on a moving cycle

  • @Amiteen
    @Amiteen 4 місяці тому

    Sir I am this student amit Kumar.

  • @tecnologygyan1830
    @tecnologygyan1830 9 місяців тому +1

    If a man is at rest and he saw that moving charge creates the magnetic field and women with same speed as the moving charge is travelling then for the man there is magnetic field and for women there is no magnetic field. As the moving charges create a magnetic field is a fundamental phenomenon of electromagnetism .
    So sir what will be your conclusion on it plz explain me

  • @manjul525
    @manjul525 9 місяців тому +1

    Nicely explained ❤❤

  • @rounak958
    @rounak958 9 місяців тому +1

    Sir apsee request hai aaap.plzzz ek baar 10 aur 12 ke saree chpterr ke videos bana deen plzz sirr bachoo ki sari problmm solve hojye plzz sir🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @srinidhiananth2524
    @srinidhiananth2524 9 місяців тому

    Sir please explain this paragraph
    magnetic field never
    does any work on charges as magnetic force acts in direction
    normal to their motion. We can modify this statement as net
    work done by magnetic force on moving charges is always zero
    but it is possible that there are work done involved by magnetic
    forces in a system but equal positive and negative work causes
    Ano net work done. In the phenomenon of electromagnetic
    induction magnetic force does negative work on mechanical
    agents who are displacing a body which contains charges and
    extract energy from mechanical work and does positive work on
    charges in inducing EMF in the conducting bodies which may
    cause induced current to flow if circuit is closed. Always total
    work by magnetic forces is zero in system but it acts as a
    mediator in transformation of mechanical energy to electrical energy

  • @984rohitkumar6
    @984rohitkumar6 9 місяців тому +4

    Sir, in 'light' chapter I learnt that after passing through a mirror or lens if parallel rays are emerged they can meet at infinity.
    But how is this possible to meet two parallel rays???

    • @milli3leven377
      @milli3leven377 8 місяців тому +1

      When something is meeting at infinity, it means that it is never going to meet because infinity is infinite
      For easy explanation:
      Imagine 2 parallel railway lines, when you will look into the distance, the tracks will appear to meet at a point on the horizon.This meeting point is 'infinity'. The tracks never meet but the way we percieve distant parallel line makes it look like its meeting at infinity

  • @premkumarmalhotra7473
    @premkumarmalhotra7473 9 місяців тому +3

    This same doubt troubled me for a week and I kept searching for answer until i went through the lectures of nv sir and physics galaxy book , I wish this video had been uploaded earlier

    • @positive1061
      @positive1061 5 місяців тому

      Please explain to me. I don't understand Hindi.

  • @vedantv.khairnar1181
    @vedantv.khairnar1181 9 місяців тому +24

    #question can we explain VBT theory in chemistry about bonding and antibonding by using interference of waves ?

  • @DarthVader-it4iz
    @DarthVader-it4iz 9 місяців тому

    hail the man with no haters

  • @ashutoshraj8483
    @ashutoshraj8483 8 місяців тому +1

    Can someone explain why we don't count the kinetic energy?

  • @jayantachoudhury4397
    @jayantachoudhury4397 9 місяців тому +6

    Sir ...I don't know how to say.... I'm just a dropper after class 12... I've attained your every course...from the Newtonian mechanics to the last one magnetostatic. I've interest in Physics and Mathematics. Sir some days ago I got an offer from University of Leeds in the department theoretical physics. Sir , should i join? As you're one of the greatest Physicists , if I get your guidance, it will means a lot to me...
    Pranam Sir,