Was Hamilton really to blame for turn 1 incident in Miami?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 тра 2024
  • F1 Onboard
    Telemetry from MultiViewer for F1
  • Спорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 649

  • @srthebox4946
    @srthebox4946 Місяць тому +737

    When you run so wide that you hit the guy who was already running wide.

    • @Igamelouis
      @Igamelouis Місяць тому +24

      Bro spitting fact

    • @ArifAlAmin0714
      @ArifAlAmin0714 Місяць тому +15

      Bro summarised everything in a statement

    • @kanyobanda1206
      @kanyobanda1206 Місяць тому +2

      I like this 😂

    • @tedfromyt6523
      @tedfromyt6523 Місяць тому +11

      but based on the onboard of stroll when hamilton hit them it looks like it didnt even change so alonso counter steer is more sense

    • @prentertainment7533
      @prentertainment7533 Місяць тому

      Watch McLaren gets podium at silverstone [Onboard Camera] - ua-cam.com/video/pHgZT52SZto/v-deo.html

  • @XolSanctum
    @XolSanctum Місяць тому +248

    Can we see Checo coming in like a torpedo next?
    I wanna see how close he was to actually hitting Max

    • @CockMcBallsddd
      @CockMcBallsddd Місяць тому

      I actually think they may have touched by a few millimeters. I wanna see that one too.

    • @robertdevries2045
      @robertdevries2045 Місяць тому +11

      from what i heard is that max had scratches on his diffuser :P

    • @LDRX44
      @LDRX44 Місяць тому +4

      @@robertdevries2045no shot.

    • @dave007465
      @dave007465 Місяць тому +3

      I saw a report said it was 1cm close from hitting

    • @darenwalchofficial7054
      @darenwalchofficial7054 Місяць тому +3

      it was 1 cm

  • @ChiYoungKC
    @ChiYoungKC Місяць тому +495

    If Alonso turned without watching his mirrors he would have been torpedoed by Hamilton.
    I'm pretty sure him checking the mirror for so long was because he saw the speed at which Hamilton was closing in.

    • @tedfromyt6523
      @tedfromyt6523 Місяць тому +33

      if alonso didnt give a room for hamilton to go in i dont think hamilton will dive since he have haas to his left side watch the drone shot properly

    • @sorinhorvath4680
      @sorinhorvath4680 Місяць тому +78

      @tedfromyt6523 at that point Hamilton was already going for it and Alonso knew it and tried to leave the space, but ultimately had no choice but turn, since he had Stroll to his left turning. Besides that, Hamilton was never going to make it without crashing into someone, as it was 3 wide, even 4 wide at one point. And to add to that, Hamilton's move would be considered a divebomb which is not allowed for a reason, cars ahead were already turning when Hamilton crashed into them. I think Hamilton thought it was clear past Alonso so he could squeeze Alonso to a wider line and get away with it. It was a misjudgement in Hamilton's side

    • @Weezy10580
      @Weezy10580 Місяць тому +16

      He was it’s clear Hamilton bias

    • @tedfromyt6523
      @tedfromyt6523 Місяць тому

      @@sorinhorvath4680 for you being stupid this is easy it is alonso is wrong at the alonso stroll collision no matter what ur saying. it clear no onboard cam he was busy on his side mirror. hamilton is clear at fault on hamilton-alonso collision. BUt on stroll norris collision its not clear if alonso counter steer contribute more on collision as we see here 2:24 even if hamilton didnt hit them alonso left front tyre lining up with stroll rear tyre and with the counter steer to make it worse even if hamilton didnt hit alonso . norris and stroll colllisiion would still exist EASY AS THAT dont care what alonso says clear on the footage

    • @tedfromyt6523
      @tedfromyt6523 Місяць тому +3

      @@Weezy10580 keeep being blind

  • @MyRealName
    @MyRealName Місяць тому +435

    Imagine the outrage if it was Stroll causing any of the incidents this weekend..

    • @ArifAlAmin0714
      @ArifAlAmin0714 Місяць тому +10

      Ah I don't want to imagine that but I know what it would have been 😅

    • @groundedgaming
      @groundedgaming Місяць тому +54

      Stroll does not even need to play a major hand in this incident and people still blame him for it.
      Some people really only see the world from a tunnel.

    • @MeltingRubberZ28
      @MeltingRubberZ28 Місяць тому +25

      The biggest issue is ham wasn't penalized for it. All his fans always cry that he gets penalized for everything but this is yet another classic example of him getting away unscathed.

    • @BostilCensurado
      @BostilCensurado Місяць тому +11

      any collision with Stroll involved, is 100% his fault, dont sweat it

    • @BostilCensurado
      @BostilCensurado Місяць тому

      @@groundedgaming you are defending a rich dumbass that shouldn't even be in the grid, people will always use him as an escape goat, and they rightfully should.
      He wont even care while relaxing on his cruise ship, trust me

  • @TheMiGger
    @TheMiGger Місяць тому +23

    Alonso was clearly avoiding the approaching Hamilton, he did not "misjudge", he avoided a collision. Hamilton should have NEVER launched himself so deep, that was the only possible outcome.

    • @MDgp5dl
      @MDgp5dl Місяць тому +4

      Trying so hard not blame Alonso ha 😂 . Look at 1:08

    • @TheMiGger
      @TheMiGger Місяць тому +3

      ​@@MDgp5dl But at 1:27 it's clear that Hamilton didn't make the corner: he missed the apex by a mile, practically stopped in the middle of the corner to square it off. Also, at 2:00 you see Alonso checking _twice_ the mirror: it wasn't a mistake, he was waiting to initiate the turn because he knew Hamilton wasn't hitting that apex. Had he turned in as normal, Hamilton would have gone straight into its side like a torpedo

    • @andrewwright4195
      @andrewwright4195 28 днів тому +1

      ​​@@MDgp5dlLewis never does anything wrong saint Lewis huh

    • @MDgp5dl
      @MDgp5dl 27 днів тому +1

      @@andrewwright4195 That's not point dummy. Am talking about the crash between Alonso and Stroll which was bound to happen if Hamilton was there or NO

    • @andrewwright4195
      @andrewwright4195 27 днів тому

      @MDgp5dl stroll turned into Alonso and Lewis locked up and turned into Alonso

  • @LilRy95
    @LilRy95 Місяць тому +294

    It can just as easily be said Alonso was waiting to see where Hamilton would appear before turning into the corner rather than he misjudged the turn in to the corner. If Hamilton wasn't flying up the inside, Alonso would've just turned in at the apex,. Hamilton's move caused that whole chain reaction and guaranteed there was gonna be a collision.

    • @theprotagonist8988
      @theprotagonist8988 Місяць тому +15

      yes

    • @timbuktu4235
      @timbuktu4235 Місяць тому +12

      Spot on

    • @MathewBT81
      @MathewBT81 Місяць тому +15

      I agree, Alonso saw Hammy and left him as much room as possible then stroll (Mr unawares lol) just turned in. He's known to do this type of thing 😂

    • @mmanolo
      @mmanolo Місяць тому +11

      We can apply here the same as In Australia with Russel and Alonso. Hamilton creates all. Hamilton's fault 100%.

    • @tedfromyt6523
      @tedfromyt6523 Місяць тому +2

      but the position of hamilton 1.5 car length and based on the drone shot it is blind side of alonso car therefore that haas is more can be seen on side mirror

  • @cf5914
    @cf5914 Місяць тому +72

    It looks more to me that Alonso was aware of Hamilton bombing down on the inside and left room for that and then Stroll clumsily turned in on him. In a first corner like that you have to expect that you're going to go in several cars wide...

    • @pauladam4158
      @pauladam4158 Місяць тому +7

      Did Lance Stroll prepare the commentary in this video? Stroll clearly changed lanes in the corner, I guess hoping that Alonso would evaporate, so they collided. And then Hamilton torpedoed the corner, I guess hoping everybody would evaporate. Poor Lando on the outside leaving space, never saw this coming.

    • @jurekgadzinowski2895
      @jurekgadzinowski2895 Місяць тому +2

      @@pauladam4158 Excactly. Seems like stroll wanted to take a switcheroo like line, enter wide and late and exit near the inside. But it wasnt possible at any moment, since Alonso was alongside, he was there even before the inside white line starts to turn, so Stroll had no right to cut him off like if Alonso wasnt there. Racing incident. If there is anyone who was clearly at fault it was Lewis who colided with Alonso, but their contact wasnt the prime reason of this whole pileup.

    • @ImReverseGiraffe
      @ImReverseGiraffe Місяць тому

      It's exactly this. If you watch Alonso's onboard you can see him spot Lewis in the mirror

    • @l3gionmusic814
      @l3gionmusic814 Місяць тому +5

      I don't know how out of all of this you still find a way to blame it on Stroll. Stroll did nothing wrong here, left more than enough room for Alonso, he's just not telepathic and knew Hamilton would come from 2 cars back on the other side of Alonso.
      I like Hamilton so it's not just hate, but he did cause this. Alonso got caught out by - probably - predicting Hamilton would go into the side of him so didn't turn in on a normal line, but Stroll did absolutely nothing wrong.

    • @cf5914
      @cf5914 Місяць тому

      @@l3gionmusic814 Because Lance has consistently demonstrated that he has the racer IQ to be aware of multiple cars on the track at once and anticipating their moves and Alonso doesn't...
      OK.

  • @TheAtsumito
    @TheAtsumito Місяць тому +8

    I like to look at it from another perspective. If Alonso had not been in that position, if we made him disappear, would Hamilton have collided with Stroll? Most likely yes, and would Stroll then have collided with Norris? I'm not so sure. To me, it's clear that Alonso sees Hamilton coming in fast from the inside and tries to make space, ending up colliding with Stroll who is unaware that Alonso is going to encroach on him to make room.
    If Hamilton had not come in too fast from the inside, would Alonso have collided with Stroll? Probably not

  • @lbbc33
    @lbbc33 Місяць тому +181

    British: No
    Rest of the world: YES

    • @carsismyaddiction6919
      @carsismyaddiction6919 Місяць тому +24

      british bias

    • @andrewmelton2686
      @andrewmelton2686 Місяць тому +35

      Hamilton pulls a "yield or we crash" move, widely regarded as verstappens signature wheel to wheel tactic
      F1 fans cry

    • @tedfromyt6523
      @tedfromyt6523 Місяць тому

      ur dumb lol keep being delusional its clear on the video 3:30 based on the onboard cam hamilton hitting alonso isn’t really contribute to stroll and norris crashed

    • @CockMcBallsddd
      @CockMcBallsddd Місяць тому

      Seriously. Isn't it time they moved on to Lando or George at this point? Lol. The fanboi types are the worst.

    • @CockMcBallsddd
      @CockMcBallsddd Місяць тому

      @@andrewmelton2686 Another dimwit defending piss poor driving standards - because someone else did it. If your only justification for something is "yea well someone else did it too" - then you're wrong. (and it makes you sound like a child)

  • @f1_onboardsAC
    @f1_onboardsAC Місяць тому +24

    I do not agree with you this time. In 2:02 Hamilton was already ahead of Hulk and Fernando was clearly paying attention to Hamilton coming too fast, he already knew what was happening. This can be confirmed in the aerial camera. Look at the exact moment where the McLaren moves to the left in Fernando's onboard and then pay attention to that moment in the aerial camera. Hamilton is already ahead of Hulk and Fernando clearly watching him into his mirrors, and keeps checking the mirrors for a certain time after that moment while he knows that he can´t turn yet. Delays the steering input to give Hamilton as much space as possible to avoid a potential crash, and Stroll's sudden turn-in makes the crash unavoidable. I think that is unfair to say that Fernando crashed on his own because he was already reacting to Hamilton, who ultimately still crashed into him even if ALO went super wide into his teammate.
    In my opinion, Fernando KNEW he had nowhere to go, he was clearly watching Hamilton come way too fast. This is a great example of Fernando's awareness and the video shows the inverse thing.

  • @agostinodauria5455
    @agostinodauria5455 Місяць тому +78

    When the analisys about Norris safety car entry?
    If safety entered in front of Norris, had him the time to pit and rejoin first?

    • @laribeyre
      @laribeyre Місяць тому +23

      If I can help, I rechecked the timing after the race.
      When the SC is decided to be out by race director, Norris is on the finish line (or very close to)
      Norris is 11.415s in front of Max
      In the same time, Tsunoda is 11.984s in front of Lewis
      Tsunoda pits (in 2.4s) and remains in front of Lewis for 1.166s
      For me with those information, the SC can't be in front of Norris (and he must lets pass everyone and it's a shame that it didn't happen like this)
      Even if the SC was not in front of Max, I think Norris could keep the 1st position (or maybe in worst case be 2nd but with new tyres)

    • @agostinodauria5455
      @agostinodauria5455 Місяць тому +6

      @@laribeyre thanks a lot!
      I still wait for a Yelistener video 😅

    • @Marc98338
      @Marc98338 Місяць тому +7

      Of course he wouldnt because by the time they would be at the pit entrance again, most of the grid would already be in a train. Upto Perez was already in a train when the SC crossed the pit entrance. So most likely Norris wouldve come out behind Lewis in p8 or p9.

    • @elpatosilva
      @elpatosilva Місяць тому +1

      If I remember correctly, SC waits for the cars at the exit of pit lane, SC lane number 2. If SC deployed too late and caught Verstappen but not Norris, that means Norris started before Verstappen.

    • @BrandoN-ie1np
      @BrandoN-ie1np Місяць тому +3

      When the safety car was called Lando just passed the pit entry and not even crossed the last corner before the straight but he is Bristish so we all know what happened

  • @djdrastic1
    @djdrastic1 Місяць тому +116

    The infamous Ham "understeer" on display.

    • @olischwarz2912
      @olischwarz2912 Місяць тому +8

      There was no understeer. He was too deep into the corner, that's the end of it. Not that his car wouldn't turn.

    • @Shifftee
      @Shifftee Місяць тому +24

      Nah, that’s the infamous Senna “I went for a gap” moment

    • @olischwarz2912
      @olischwarz2912 Місяць тому

      @@Shifftee ahah yeah fr tho, but we saw how Perez had zero grip on that line as well

    • @olischwarz2912
      @olischwarz2912 Місяць тому +2

      @@Urgrannytranny I mean you can discuss all of these tiny little things about the moment but, in the end, the driver is the only one that knows what really went on. Either way, I doubt Lewis intended to try and take out 3 cars at once.

    • @BaronXOfficial
      @BaronXOfficial 22 дні тому

      No one said that was his intention. However, as a seven time WDC he should have known this could happen so he still willingly tried a move anyone with that level of experience would have known was dangerous. He was carrying too much speed and drove dangerously. Just look at his trajectory before the collision, he was not even close to staying on his own line.

  • @rubenssz
    @rubenssz Місяць тому +56

    I love Hamilton but he was clearly faster than his tires temp and understeered into Alonso. It's pretty clear for the ignorant me.

  • @CringeLord0119
    @CringeLord0119 Місяць тому +26

    You can see Alonso reacting to Hamilton torpedoing, he could tell it was gonna be an accident and went into stroll as a result

  • @ThePeisithanatos
    @ThePeisithanatos Місяць тому +4

    🔴 List of accidents investigated on first lap (or stopped restart) penalized in 2022, 2023 and 2024:
    2022
    🔴 E. OCON 🇫🇷 (Bahrain, start): 5 seconds penalty, 2 superlicense points.
    🔴 G. RUSSELL 🇬🇧 (Austria, start): 5 seconds penalty, 2 superlicense points.
    “We have not considered this as a ‘first lap incident’ as it was a battle between two cars that was not affected by the other cars.”
    🔴 E. OCON 🇫🇷 (France, start): 5 seconds penalty, 2 superlicense points.
    🔴 D. RICCIARDO 🇦🇺 (Brazil, start): 3 penalty places for the next race, 2 superlicense points.
    “The Stewards recognized that the incident was not reckless. Anyway, they determined that the incident was between two cars and was not influenced by other cars, so it is not a 'first lap incident'”
    2023
    🔴 C. SAINZ 🇪🇸 (Australia, highlight): 5 second penalty, 2 superlicense points.
    “Despite the fact that it was a first lap incident, we considered that the 55 car had enough space to avoid the collision.”
    🔴 N. HÜLKENBERG 🇩🇪 (Monaco, start): 5 seconds penalty, 2 superlicense points.
    “The Stewards consider that he dived and was unable to control the car (...), he does not have the ‘benefit of the doubt’ as it was a first lap incident.”
    🔴 G. ZHOU 🇨🇳 (Hungary, start): 5 seconds penalty, 2 superlicense points.
    “Despite the fact that it was a first-lap incident, where some leeway is given to drivers who find themselves in the middle of a lot of cars, this particular incident is not one of those.”
    -
    🟢 List of investigated first-lap (or standing restart) accidents not penalized in 2022, 2023 and 2024:
    2022
    🟢 L. HAMILTON 🇬🇧 (Belgium, start): no penalty.
    “The Stewards considered this to be a first-lap incident with a lot of movement relative to other cars in the first few corners.”
    2023
    🟢 L. HAMILTON 🇬🇧 (Qatar, start): no penalty.
    “Despite the fact that it can be argued that Car 44 was predominantly at fault, the Stewards, taking into account that the incident happened at Turn 1 with several cars involved, have determined that the incident is considered to be a typical Turn 1’ incident.”
    2024
    🟢 L. HAMILTON 🇬🇧 (Miami, start): no penalty.
    Thanks: Victor Abad

  • @MikkelL03
    @MikkelL03 Місяць тому +7

    3:42 I think it was option nr B. A reason why i think that is because we saw earlier that Alonso was checking his mirrors, probably seeing Lewis coming in very hot which i think made Alonso not steer in time which lead to hitting stroll at first and later when Lewis hit him i think he countersteered in a effort not to crash out completely.

  • @adriangaleron3293
    @adriangaleron3293 Місяць тому +149

    First, I like this channel, but this video is all wrong. Alonso was checking his mirrors and went wide BECAUSE Hamilton was coming so fast and he already judged that it was impossible that lewis did the corner. He touched stroll, not crashed. Hamilton, despite having more than enough room for his car, crashed into alonso.
    If you play both onboards simultaneously you will see.

    • @a.a.6542
      @a.a.6542 Місяць тому +15

      Exactly this. Totally agree.

    • @VarioLover
      @VarioLover Місяць тому +4

      Pure, Alonso fault. He too scare for Hamilton. 😂😂

    • @cyancut21
      @cyancut21 Місяць тому +15

      Moreover, the countersteer moment Alonso had after touching Stroll most likely was due to oversteer
      Because when you touch someone with the fronts, it suddenly turns them, the rears can’t keep with that turning and lose grip

    • @VarioLover
      @VarioLover Місяць тому +1

      @@cyancut21 nice. Smart review

  • @idontlikemakingthis
    @idontlikemakingthis Місяць тому +28

    For me, this is a racing incident. Stroll shouldn’t turn in like he does and should have better awareness, Alonso doesn’t turn in as much because he saw Hamilton coming (when he checked his mirrors) and actually could’ve come in more, and Hamilton took a clumsy late dive only because Alonso left so much space. Clumsy driving on a track where everyone had a hard time finding grip

    • @robertdevries2045
      @robertdevries2045 Місяць тому +2

      luckily you're completely neutral lollllllllllllllll

    • @alpd7638
      @alpd7638 Місяць тому +4

      Stroll does absolutely nothing wrong. He's following piastri's line. Hes got vast majority of his car ahead of Alonso and has no idea Hamilton is coming.
      Stroll has zero blame

    • @Aletonsi
      @Aletonsi Місяць тому

      @@alpd7638 but piastri had all the room for taking that line as he came from the mid right side of the track with no cars near him giving him the chance of tightening the corner as he did but stroll went from the far left side of the track having alonso's car at his back right side. Also stroll's intended line is even tighter than piastri if you watch it a bit closely (at least is what it seems for me).

    • @pramitpratimdas8198
      @pramitpratimdas8198 Місяць тому +1

      Stroll is blameless but I agree with rest. That's probably what the fia officials decided as well

  • @lucasabdo4260
    @lucasabdo4260 Місяць тому +54

    I was under the impression that Stroll just turned in without realizing Alonso was there, but watching you explain it has changed my mind. Good video, informative as always!

    • @ArifAlAmin0714
      @ArifAlAmin0714 Місяць тому +1

      Matt needs to watch this

    • @albertopinoblanco
      @albertopinoblanco Місяць тому +5

      But it contains misjudged info, as Alonso was seeing Hamilton coming. If he didn't ran wide Hamilton would have passed above Alonso

    • @andrewwright4195
      @andrewwright4195 28 днів тому

      ​@@albertopinoblanconever Lewis falut is it saint Lewis

  • @kilierloop
    @kilierloop Місяць тому +13

    I really doubt Alonso had a misjudgement because he was checking the mirror... he check the mirror much before and also brake much before of where you paused the image. He was just trying to open the inside because he already noticed HAM on the inside. But he knows that if he don't open the door he will suffer much more damage... the answer is B but both times, on the braking and on the apex... he open the line to avoid get hit from the inside from a car comming too fast... Others drivers probably didn't realize HAM on the inside and the end is a classic torpedo like Romain Grosjean hitting everyone in front...

  • @OPEK.
    @OPEK. Місяць тому +4

    watching all of these different angles, the only who looks like they werent trying to avoid a collision was stroll, granted he has the clearest road around him out of all of them. It looks like he has no idea at all there are even cars around him

  • @baddoer
    @baddoer Місяць тому +171

    Even if Alonso turned 1 meter earlier Hamilton would still hit him and send into Stroll. Case closed.

    • @tedfromyt6523
      @tedfromyt6523 Місяць тому

      hamilton only hit him because of the crashed lol u stpid

    • @omsingh3982
      @omsingh3982 Місяць тому +41

      Case closed, but you are refusing to see the whole picture. If you shoot a guy and his body gets hit by lightning later, did you kill the guy or did the lightning kill him?

    • @Winnight.
      @Winnight. Місяць тому +11

      While, if Alonso turned in 1 meter earlier then I'll bet my entire savings that Ham will not dive down the inside in that corner.

    • @Truelink41
      @Truelink41 Місяць тому +7

      he had contact with stroll before lewis was even there, alonso just went wide in the inside

    • @TheAtsumito
      @TheAtsumito Місяць тому +10

      @@Winnight. I'll bet with you, the answer is simple, it's physics, Hamilton couldn't go anywhere else

  • @nanakixd7436
    @nanakixd7436 Місяць тому +5

    Alonso did his best to avoid contact with Hamilton. He looked at him twice coming like a bull from the mirror. If there's anyone to blame for the mayhem caused, it's Hamilton. What Alonso is not going to do is close the door on Hamilton and get wrecked. Hamilton even had a small lockup coming into the turn. in this case it's Reason 2, 100% sure of it

    • @dariusdragomirescu17
      @dariusdragomirescu17 Місяць тому

      Because Alonso had collisions with Hamilton, that's why he has phobia of Hamilton, he knows that Hamilton is very dangerous

  • @AndyFromBeaverton
    @AndyFromBeaverton Місяць тому +42

    If Alonso didn't kept the inside open for Lewis, the Merc would have plowed into him and destroyed multiple cars.
    If Lance hadn't changed to a tighter arc in the middle of the corner, the contact with Fernando would have been minimal.

    • @maxbrandt1324
      @maxbrandt1324 Місяць тому +6

      How tf do you expect Stroll to see all of what happened behind him?

    • @profacecreator3810
      @profacecreator3810 Місяць тому +5

      @@maxbrandt1324 mirrors.

    • @MadelnOahu
      @MadelnOahu Місяць тому +5

      @@maxbrandt1324 The same way Alonso saw all the cars around him

    • @maxbrandt1324
      @maxbrandt1324 Місяць тому +1

      @@MadelnOahu Hamilton was right behind Alonso... Stroll was on the outside and 3 or 4 cars between he and Hamilton, it's impossible to see or expect that

    • @JoeYork202
      @JoeYork202 Місяць тому +2

      @@maxbrandt1324 F1 is supposed to be the pinnacle of motorsport, expecting the drivers to check their mirrors and have situational awareness is the bare minimum

  • @user-li7xc5ol9b
    @user-li7xc5ol9b Місяць тому +94

    its clear enough!! Hamilton came like a torpedo just like Perez in the race missjudged his breaks understeered into Alonso completely missing the apex.Thats a penalty for sure!! The contact between Stroll and Alonso is more like first lap incident.

    • @tedfromyt6523
      @tedfromyt6523 Місяць тому +18

      bro watch the video properly

    • @hamzterix
      @hamzterix Місяць тому +26

      Lewis literally pushed both of them to Lando, TF you talking about re-watching?

    • @tedfromyt6523
      @tedfromyt6523 Місяць тому +6

      @@hamzterix 3:30 if hamilton really contributed then the onboard cam would felt more impact not smooth alonso counter steer is more likely contributed to the push since its smooth but since stewards can’t just decide whether just because smooth or not

    • @tedfromyt6523
      @tedfromyt6523 Місяць тому

      @@hamzterix 3:30

    • @hamzterix
      @hamzterix Місяць тому +3

      @tedfromyt6523 0:41 the moment Lewis really boosted them into Lando. Yes there was contact before Lewis hit (Alonso anticipating the missile's arrival) but it would have been "first lap/T1" kind of "no further investigation" light incident. Also, watch the heli shot.

  • @ayochill9716
    @ayochill9716 11 днів тому

    I think I just found my new favorite channel, the way that information is presented is very clear and educated, I look forward to seeing more of this analysis as this season unfolds!

  • @900108Chale
    @900108Chale Місяць тому +2

    1:21 *You forgot something: **_"Always live die eSpaze"_* ALO in 2010 and something.
    Nando kept his word.

  • @adamneradilek4444
    @adamneradilek4444 Місяць тому +44

    The thing is, Alonso has literally nowhere to go. Stroll turned in and Hamilton dove his inside. The reason Alonso collided with Stroll in the first place, was because he knew he can't turn because he has Hamilton coming down the inside. I don't see how this is anywhere close to Alonso's fault since he basically got sandwiched into turn 1.

    • @santhoshrangit02
      @santhoshrangit02 Місяць тому +5

      try watching the video maybe ur alonso bias will see the light XDDD

    • @adamneradilek4444
      @adamneradilek4444 Місяць тому +14

      @@santhoshrangit02 Watched the video. Now please again tell me where was Alonso supposed to go.

    • @Shifftee
      @Shifftee Місяць тому +4

      It doesn’t work like that.
      You are responsible for where your car is going, not for what’s happening behind you. It doesn’t matter who was coming behind you - you cause an accident, that’s your fault.

    • @slimstrait780
      @slimstrait780 Місяць тому +7

      @@Shifftee nah broski. It's multiple scenarios happening simultaneously. That is such narrow minded thinking.
      If ALonso focused on Stroll inside of Lewis, he would have been washed off the track and into the barrier with the torpedo coming through the inside line. You as a driver in racing or on the consumer road do the best to avoid unnecessary collisions.

    • @Shifftee
      @Shifftee Місяць тому

      @@slimstrait780 Unless you got driven into, you cannot blame someone that was behind or alongside you for crashing into someone in front of you.
      It’s not another driver’s responsibility for your overreaction. So saying Hamilton is at fault for the first collision because Alonso saw him in his mirrors is totally absurd.

  • @robertvermaat8949
    @robertvermaat8949 27 днів тому +1

    Sprintrace:
    Lewis: "I saw a gap on the inside so I went for it"
    Race:
    Kevin: "I saw a gap on the inside so I went for it"
    Lewis: "Magnussen drove into me"
    :)

  • @andrexmillan
    @andrexmillan Місяць тому +2

    Saw several cars cornering that wide actually, I think most "responsible" drivers use to keep the actual position across the wide of the track for turn and counter turn tracks. Also, right side of the track was completely dirty.

  • @michaczarnocki181
    @michaczarnocki181 29 днів тому

    this song is whats playing on every chemistry experiment

  • @Agarwaen087
    @Agarwaen087 Місяць тому +23

    The first collision is Hamilton's fault too. Put yourself into Alonso's shoes: You watch your side mirror and see Hamilton NOT SLOWING down, you HAVE to leave space or he'll ram into you... If Alonso would have turned earlier, the collison with Hamilton would have been far more serious and dangerous...

    • @Weijierr
      @Weijierr Місяць тому +2

      Alonso was checking for Niko in his mirrors he was not watching 3 cars behind to see Lewis what are u talking about ? xDDDD

    • @PauliesWalnuts
      @PauliesWalnuts Місяць тому +5

      @@Weijierr Hamilton was fully alongside Hulkenberg by the time Alonso decided to stay away from the inside, he absolutely did react to Hamilton's dive for T1

    • @dariusdragomirescu17
      @dariusdragomirescu17 Місяць тому +1

      ​@@WeijierrYeah man, that's was bad comment, you didnt saw at Hamilton coming too fast like bull?

  • @Johannes788
    @Johannes788 Місяць тому +17

    I think Stroll turned in very early considering he was on the outside. Just compare his line with the cars directly in front or behind him. I think Alsonso didn't expect that und was also looking in his right mirror, where Hamilton was flying in, that why he crashed into Stroll

  • @shadowgtf1570
    @shadowgtf1570 Місяць тому +15

    First comment? Jk I really don't care, i'm not those kind of idiots.
    I'm being serious, I really do love these videos. Provides a bunch of different perspectives without any sort of bias whatsoever. This is hard to find nowadays, so keep cooking on those videos.

    • @eanfran
      @eanfran Місяць тому

      2024 and still mad about first comments, lmao. Yeah dude really sounds like you don't care

    • @shadowgtf1570
      @shadowgtf1570 Місяць тому

      @@eanfran Calm down, bro. Trust I really don't care at all. I just noted that because i clicked on the video and there were no comments. I'd prefer not to get mad at you man, but don't test it

  • @vsr5169
    @vsr5169 Місяць тому +1

    I think you have reason, but Stroll drove in to the corner maybe a bit agressive to the apex like if anybody could be there in the first corner of first lap.

  • @crowntug
    @crowntug Місяць тому

    I’ve been waiting for you to make this video ever since the sprint race, thank you!

  • @winniewinner4545
    @winniewinner4545 Місяць тому +7

    Great analysis once again. Love your content!

  • @user-ts7ey2dm4h
    @user-ts7ey2dm4h Місяць тому

    Where I can found exaust mic sound?

  • @Saundo_225
    @Saundo_225 28 днів тому

    I would say alonsos countersteer mid contact was not voluntary at all. The forces going through the wheels and steering column from wheel to wheel contact is much higher than could be achieved by any steering input.

  • @puertoricanvtec
    @puertoricanvtec Місяць тому

    👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽 love this videos man great job just showing the footage, giving your take, then letting viewers decide. 👏🏽👏🏽

  • @ytwos1
    @ytwos1 Місяць тому +23

    “It is quite unlikely” Alonso left space for Hamilton? He said himself he saw Hamilton coming in like a bull and therefor left him the space as otherwise it would have been end of race. That stroll as usual has no situational awareness and just drives into Alonso makes no difference. It is not only not unlikely, it is for sure Alonso did leave space to try and keep alive.

    • @tedfromyt6523
      @tedfromyt6523 Місяць тому +5

      well drivers can lie thats why stewards base on the footage itself hamilton have a 1.5 car length thats basicly almos two cars side by side if you look into the drone shot

    • @gauravmalltarlok5354
      @gauravmalltarlok5354 Місяць тому +3

      Yeah, Alonso said it, therefore it must be true.

    • @Selendeki
      @Selendeki Місяць тому +4

      @@gauravmalltarlok5354 We can weigh what he said with what we watch on the video as well. I watch the video and my impression is strongly that Alonso was telling the truth. The more I watch it the clearer it becomes that he was in a tight squeeze and an accident was inevitable no matter what he did. I think the reason for that is mostly because of Hamilton going for that gap.

    • @tedfromyt6523
      @tedfromyt6523 Місяць тому

      @@gauravmalltarlok5354 stpid

    • @omsingh3982
      @omsingh3982 Місяць тому +2

      Yeah, Alonso has never been clever in these situations, right?

  • @SDRaygon
    @SDRaygon Місяць тому +2

    Do this with the Kevin Logan incident please

  • @JanMiclat_sWorld0504
    @JanMiclat_sWorld0504 Місяць тому

    man this type of F1 analysis with soothing music gives me relaxation in the middle of an action

  • @jaaptendijk7192
    @jaaptendijk7192 Місяць тому +7

    Hamilton dive bombing the Haas was already slightly optimistic. Let alone Alonso ahead.

  • @aventusV33
    @aventusV33 Місяць тому +6

    When you go wide and hit a guy, who's already gone wide and hit another guy, surely you don't just get away scot free

    • @groundedgaming
      @groundedgaming Місяць тому

      Watch the video, please. He was a passenger in this event.

    • @tedfromyt6523
      @tedfromyt6523 Місяць тому

      look at this delusional guy what u dont understand on the video so i could explain how stupid u are

    • @aventusV33
      @aventusV33 Місяць тому +3

      @@groundedgaming how was he a passenger when he was the one braking ?

    • @tanishqsagar3440
      @tanishqsagar3440 Місяць тому

      @@groundedgaming LMAO!

    • @andrewwright4195
      @andrewwright4195 28 днів тому

      ​@@aventusV33for the corner he was breaking for it stroll and Lewis locked up

  • @michaelg2394
    @michaelg2394 Місяць тому +15

    If Alonso wasn't there Hamilton still would of caused a collision with Stroll coming in that fast.

  • @hugo46
    @hugo46 Місяць тому

    I might disagree with some parts of the analysis but this channel is gold! Thanks for sharing this. Professional, well explained, good footage. Keep going!

  • @ryansedgwick-londoncycling9007
    @ryansedgwick-londoncycling9007 Місяць тому +1

    This was a teammate battle. I think Alonso was running Stroll wide to ensure Stroll wouldn’t sweep around the outside of him in T1 and get the position.
    Hamilton then saw the gap and took it, only late on did Alonso spot that threat and he got caught in no man’s land between the two of them. 3 into 1 never works in F1.

  • @mkganya6013
    @mkganya6013 Місяць тому +7

    I think Lance turned in too much and too early trying to get closer to the apex without bothering about Fernando. Look at the trajectory of Oscar who was inside of Lance and still turned conservatively compared to the sharp turn of Lance - can be seen 1:01 onwards and also from 2:12 onwards. Fernando cannot complain about Lance for obvious reasons, so he pinned all the blame on Lewis, whereas Lewis was nowhere in the picture in collision 1.

    • @KnightRiderOfVoid
      @KnightRiderOfVoid Місяць тому +1

      This!
      Crash 1 it could be argued that it was a T1 incident because Alonso went a bit wide but still, Stroll had enough room and he also turned in early. If any of them were to get a penalty it would be Stroll for turning in early with enough space on the outside but, being T1 and so tricky I think most people would be OK with no further investigation, it was not fatal but obviously being both Astons they would not complain about it.
      As for crash 2, you can clearly see that at that point Alonso was sandwiched so he had nowhere to go, HAM came like a torpedo and right there Alonso was trying to minimize contact with Stroll (at least to avoid more damage bc they already touched 1 time at that point). Sure ALO and STR had already touched but they were mostly ok with minimal damage, HAM coming into the inside caused ALO to not have space and crashed again with STR, this time it was way more impactful because of the crash severity itself but also because by that point STR was also in a tough spot, trying to recover from the previous contact with ALO and being hit from the inside, he was forced into NOR.
      As you said, ALO can't just publicly blame STR so he shifted the full blame to HAM but, had HAM not dive bombed the inside, the 1st contact between ALO would have been mostly ok. On the other hand, had ALO and STR not touched, HAM would still have crashed with ALO or someone else, there's now way he gets off without a penalty if it were another less "popular" driver.

  • @jithu7573
    @jithu7573 Місяць тому +1

    I don't think it was a misjudgement. Mans looked twice to comprehend wtf was coming at him from that far and having flashbacks of most of his unlucky race start crashes.

  • @LeorixSP
    @LeorixSP 29 днів тому

    Its Stroll turning tighter for no reason. And then Hamilton to be so optimistic with fresh tyres.

  • @joseesequias4142
    @joseesequias4142 26 днів тому

    eu amo esse canal!
    i love this channel!!

  • @brunoriva2949
    @brunoriva2949 27 днів тому

    Your analysis is superb....really impressive...as always..... really really good ..outstanding!!!!

  • @iampierrelouis
    @iampierrelouis Місяць тому +6

    1) the first contact between the two AM has been caused by Alonso constantly checking his mirrors because of Hamilton.
    2) the Norris DNF has been caused by the second contact in which Hamilton is at fault.
    The conclusion is: if you hide Alonso from that, Hamilton would have collided with stroll. If you hide Hamilton, Alonso could have turned right earlier making, in the worse scenario, a wheel to wheel contact with stroll

  • @keonxd8918
    @keonxd8918 Місяць тому +8

    F1 fans trying to make a balanced judgement, impossible.

  • @Jorgerally35
    @Jorgerally35 28 днів тому

    Imagine having a youtube channel and being Hamilton's fan. The fan who has a channel:

  • @luisbalderrama8145
    @luisbalderrama8145 Місяць тому

    Thank you for this analysis. At first glance, I could not understand the ruling. This clarifies it a bit more. Thank you!
    Best,
    -Luis

  • @calado92
    @calado92 28 днів тому

    This was a really strange weekend for Nando, he was behind Stroll most part of it, and than this on sprint

    • @jimmyjow27
      @jimmyjow27 25 днів тому

      Hes had wrist injuries since the quali australia crash with alpine. Hes had ups and downs with this issue and its said that this weekend his wrist condition worsened

  • @tjfransman1112
    @tjfransman1112 Місяць тому +3

    Yo can clearly see all the space from Stroll side driving into Alonso. This unsettles him as he sees Hamilton coming like a bull colliding with his front wing while stroll and Alonso tangle pushes Norris off. But ja Hamiltons Fault becoz 4 into that corner doesn’t go but he had control of the car even with the lock up

    • @minivelrey
      @minivelrey Місяць тому

      still Ham was bowling with STR if you erase ALO so, yeah better calcs into turn 1 please

    • @andrewwright4195
      @andrewwright4195 28 днів тому

      ​@@minivelreynever Lewis falut is it huh 😂 saint Lewis

  • @user-tz2gq6ck4r
    @user-tz2gq6ck4r Місяць тому

    That line Hamilton actual gives the car zero grip judge from Perez lap 1 dive bomb during the main race

  • @MrLekatt
    @MrLekatt Місяць тому

    I believe we could all have been happy if Stroll had watched his mirrors and not trying to take a 'sort of apex' line. All had possibly have come trough although not all on track but without colliding. Norris would have been pushed off track... Interesting question though; how had Hamilton's lockup have ended - we'll never know.

  • @harrodharrod5239
    @harrodharrod5239 Місяць тому +1

    Yes, he was. He divebombed the turn from different area code, locked up pretty much immediately and for the entire duration of the braking. The only reason he didn't end up with Alonso on top of his halo is, that Alonso saw him and gave him space.

  • @beats4all914
    @beats4all914 Місяць тому

    You have the best F1 analisys videos!

  • @irishRocker1
    @irishRocker1 Місяць тому

    I dont think Alonso was leaving space for Hamilton, I think he was leaving space for Hulk and Hamilton. Hulk might have torpedo'd as well and Alsonso basically slotted in his rear wheel just in front of Hulk's nose. He was probably trying to slot in ahead of Hulk and be careful in case those two tangled.

  • @Zzzlol94
    @Zzzlol94 Місяць тому +1

    Stroll just turned as he normally does and causes a collision, Hamilton also avoids another clear penalty by divebombing uncontrollably. Case closed.

  • @memolano100
    @memolano100 Місяць тому +13

    It’s amazing how Hamilton always gets away with no penalties, or penalties that are so low that they don’t even change his race.

    • @djdrastic1
      @djdrastic1 Місяць тому +5

      Helps being British and a minority

    • @vijy9980
      @vijy9980 Місяць тому

      brazil 2021 you freaking goldfish

    • @quigglyz
      @quigglyz Місяць тому

      @@djdrastic1 Whites are the minority globally. I know what you mean, but the word "minority" is a misnomer.

    • @user-iu2om5mm6y
      @user-iu2om5mm6y 23 дні тому

      Nah. He got 10 seconds or something for going 15km/h faster accidentally in the pit stop. That was few race ago.

  • @noobednatherium4082
    @noobednatherium4082 Місяць тому

    Alonso likely was ensuring he didn't get hit by Ham

  • @Wither255
    @Wither255 Місяць тому

    "All the time you have to leave the space"

  • @m6isme
    @m6isme Місяць тому

    Typos at 2:56

  • @BananaPeeler-ot9vs
    @BananaPeeler-ot9vs Місяць тому +2

    Why is everyone blaming Stroll? Like what was he supposed to do???????

    • @justinburley8659
      @justinburley8659 Місяць тому +2

      Apparently people expect him to go straight at a right-hander

    • @dariusdragomirescu17
      @dariusdragomirescu17 Місяць тому

      Hamilton admitted already his fault, he came like bull

    • @andrewwright4195
      @andrewwright4195 28 днів тому

      ​@@justinburley8659he turned into Alonso

  • @wildtigers25
    @wildtigers25 Місяць тому

    Loving your analysis videos.

  • @marcello6810
    @marcello6810 Місяць тому +2

    the goat of winning championships with a rocketship

  • @celsomh909
    @celsomh909 Місяць тому

    Nice evaluation man!

  • @Tzomthekliafafanboy
    @Tzomthekliafafanboy 23 дні тому

    Alonso just saw Hamilton divebomving him and tried to save it, at least that’s my theory. What’s crazy is that people try to blame Stroll

  • @Dracxeno
    @Dracxeno 21 день тому +1

    Well, now we know it's a British channel since it's 1000% Hamilton's fault, for people who doesn't know, Alonso was checking his mirrors during all the straight line and he understood that Hamilton would have torpedo him if he turned normally, so he waited to turn (that caused him to touch Stroll) to avoid the crash

  • @DhavidSetiawanKilluaDhavid
    @DhavidSetiawanKilluaDhavid Місяць тому

    It's a classic turn 1 no one blame issue.
    - I know Alonso got sandwich
    - Stroll didn't know where to turn because stuck with both McLaren
    - Norris got room for just avoid but out of luck
    - Lewis just sling out of nowhere with a lock up

  • @TOMO-pe4fu
    @TOMO-pe4fu Місяць тому

    I think just alonso turned to late into stroll or stroll leave him no space

  • @lukedanielgalon1596
    @lukedanielgalon1596 28 днів тому

    Honestly this is is like almost the same case with WEC in SPA 2024
    Almost since to me that’s a racing incident

  • @johnmorris7815
    @johnmorris7815 Місяць тому +1

    I think the best thing to do is just blame Stroll for turning and for being there. That about covers it.

  • @joemercedeschannel196
    @joemercedeschannel196 Місяць тому +6

    Hamiltons fault? Yes without a doubt. I also felt like Stroll did turn in a bit later than Alonso but I do not think this is his fault but it's pretty complicated to see if it was his own fault or not. I would say 50/50 with the Stroll and Alonso contact but Hamilton was full to blame with that divebomb.

    • @KnightRiderOfVoid
      @KnightRiderOfVoid Місяць тому +2

      You are part of the few objective and sensible people here, this is the right analysis. STR v ALO crash 1, possibly a lap 1 t1 incident with no further investigation, crash 2? HAM's fault any day!
      That dive bomb from HAM is not acceptable.

    • @AM93000
      @AM93000 Місяць тому

      I agree. Stroll was at fault too

    • @dariusdragomirescu17
      @dariusdragomirescu17 Місяць тому

      ​@@AM93000Stroll is not fault, how he can be able to see Hamilton coming too fast like bull? Are you dumb? Hamilton is fault as clear as day

    • @dariusdragomirescu17
      @dariusdragomirescu17 Місяць тому

      ​@@AM93000Alonso did saw Hamilton coming too fast like bull, that's was inacceptable from Hamilton to make dive bomb, he went it for gap, he admitted it clear he went it that for gap, he admitted already his fault

  • @joeyc8546
    @joeyc8546 18 днів тому

    Alonso was following the McLaren line through the corner of wide in, tight out. Stroll cut in from the wide line to about middle of the track before the apex, closing the space he and Alonso had and was different to the drivers ahead who gave others room on the inside. Alonso didnt really have time to react to Stroll while following his planned line choice and distracted himself from blaming Stroll by saying Hamilton was the cause. Yes Hamilton was too quick into the corner but you expect that sort of driver error and Alonso could have accounted for it but not Stroll at the same time. It looks more like a Stroll, then Hamilton incident, Alonso and Norris are the innocent ones.

  • @yubakadi217
    @yubakadi217 27 днів тому

    Lulu when his car isnt 1 sec faster than the rest!

  • @alessiobaruzzo1679
    @alessiobaruzzo1679 Місяць тому

    Now I pretend Alphamaxnova1's analysis of the "slightly suboptimal" turn 1 by Perez.

  • @RyanJSmith
    @RyanJSmith Місяць тому +12

    So you think Alonso just forgot about the corner he was also looking at while watching Hamilton coming at him out of control? If Alonso turned in, the crash is far more severe. The fact this "analysis" has no consideration of what happens if Alonso took the corner normally is a joke. Hamilton is responsible for the entire incident forcing Alonso to take avoiding action.

    • @andrewwright4195
      @andrewwright4195 28 днів тому

      Never Lewis falut is it crashed into him at least 3 or 4 times this season and last season

  • @alejandrogarays16
    @alejandrogarays16 Місяць тому +13

    Great video, but I think one thing is wrong. Alonso turned too late and collided with stroll because he saw Hamilton arriving like a bull in his mirror.

  • @toodoo44
    @toodoo44 Місяць тому

    I think Alonso saw ham torpedo and wanted to save the car for quali

  • @Cpr1234
    @Cpr1234 Місяць тому

    Does anyone know a reason behind Lewis's placement of his left hand during a race start? Look at any race in recent times (I'd say since 2021 preferably) and you'll almost always see that same hand placement.

    • @nitelast
      @nitelast Місяць тому

      Either for comfort, or something to do with launch control

    • @byanymeansnecessary9329
      @byanymeansnecessary9329 Місяць тому

      better control of the clutch paddle for him, he started doing it after a rule change regarding the design of the clutch paddle

  • @danydeezy3243
    @danydeezy3243 Місяць тому

    I think we need this guy on the FIA❤❤❤

  • @sulfurique78
    @sulfurique78 24 дні тому

    at 1:03 Stoll is already turning in trying to hit the apex. even Piastri hasn't started turning as much as him... I think it was stroll's fault for turning in too early while still having at least one car on the inside. True Hamilton wasn't fully in control of his car but he's on the outside so he's not the one dictating when to turn in at that point but Alonso. At 1:25 he's has 1/2 the track on the outside he could of used with Noris. Daddy's money doesn't buy you race craft.

  • @knarfxd4071
    @knarfxd4071 Місяць тому

    Colision nr1 is not on Alonso... That is Stroll doing a Stroll and just going for the apex at the race start... Just because you're ahead doesn't mean you get to drive through someone else... Legit, check the movement of Stroll relative to Piastry, braking zone Stroll is further to the outside than piastry, but then when the turning starts, Stroll turns in a lot more than everyone else around. Stroll is the only one not realising that he is not alone in the corner, in T1, of lap 1...

  • @SkullGamingShorts
    @SkullGamingShorts Місяць тому

    It's called racing. Remember that. The gap was wide open, it's definitely a combination of all of this ;)

  • @Rodrinki
    @Rodrinki 28 днів тому

    Not even a question.

  • @panutathamrin6799
    @panutathamrin6799 Місяць тому

    The thing is, Alonso saw hamilton but he couldnt do anything about it cause stroll with 10000 sec penalty already was ramming him from the other side

  • @madam94
    @madam94 29 днів тому +1

    Pretty interesting the amount of blame toward Hamilton here in the comments. By the rules of F1 he was not to blame and it was a racing incident. You can't penalize someone for someone else watching their mirror too long and colliding with their teammate who turned in with not much awareness of possible cars on his inside. As yelistener says. collision n1 is on Alonso, and n2 is on Hamilton. Side effect, Stroll/Norris.
    For the record, I agree with you yelistener, I feel that your read of the situation here is unbiased and relies solely on the facts of what happened.

  • @obr_
    @obr_ Місяць тому

    I think if Alonso had covered the inside, Hamilton wouldn't have went for a move, plus even if he did, he would have made a bigger contact with the cars ahead, also it was very dusty on the inside as we saw with Perez almost taking his teammate out. For this incident, i'd argue it's a racing incident, or we could blame Hamilton and Alonso.

  • @user-ez6uo7lv6m
    @user-ez6uo7lv6m Місяць тому

    yes stroll braked later and aloson braked earlier, ham dog would still cause collision

  • @martinoriz7524
    @martinoriz7524 Місяць тому

    The three of them are guilty. Alonso being too cautious about what he saw coming on his right but forgetting the outside. Stroll turning as if nobody was on the inside. And Hamilton thinking he could brake and turn as if nobody was ahead on the turn.

  • @oxonomy2372
    @oxonomy2372 Місяць тому

    Hamilton isn’t to blame for Alonso and Strolls crashing into each other, he’s to blame for pushing that crash into Lando

  • @qvor1996
    @qvor1996 Місяць тому +1

    TL;DR Stroll is also to blame here
    My take is:
    Alonso was expecting Lewis at the apex, so he left a car width between himself and the apex.
    in Alonso's head it looked something like - [STR] [ALO] [HAM]
    Stroll did not realize Lewis was flying in and expected Alonso to attack/to be at the apex so he turned in.
    so in Stroll's head it looked like - [NOR] [STR] [ALO]
    and as we know, in reality it was looking like - [NOR]*[STR]*[ALO]*[HAM]

    • @KnightRiderOfVoid
      @KnightRiderOfVoid Місяць тому +1

      This is the only right analysis

    • @qvor1996
      @qvor1996 Місяць тому

      @@KnightRiderOfVoid thank you

  • @chrissdevano
    @chrissdevano Місяць тому

    People actually tried to blame Stroll for this 🤦‍♂️