Is Claude 3 OPUS the New King for Academic Research?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 чер 2024
  • Exploring the latest in AI technology really feels like stepping into the future. With tools like Claude 3 OPUS and GPT-4 on the scene, writing and research are hitting a whole new level. When we dive into writing with Claude AI, it’s clear that this isn't just about typing up papers faster. It's about how these tools can think alongside us, offering insights and support that push our projects beyond what we imagined.
    ▼ ▽ Sign up for my FREE newsletter
    Join 19,000+ email subscribers receiving the free tools and academic tips directly from me:
    andrewstapleton.com.au/newsle...
    ▶ Become a Master Academic Writer With AI using my course: academy.academiainsider.com/c...
    ▶ Use my Ultimate PhD Kickstart: 12 Point Success System for Aspiring PhDs to start your PhD strong: academy.academiainsider.com/c...
    ▶ My best UA-cam advice curated into an an easy to follow course, Effortless Academia: academy.academiainsider.com/c...
    ▶ Applying for a PhD? Get my FREE PhD application resource pack to apply with confidence: www.subscribepage.com/freeapp...
    ▶ Learn what I wish I had known before starting my PhD in my ebook bundle: academiainsider.com/ebook-bun...
    Let’s break down Claude 3 OPUS vs GPT 4. Both tools are giants in the AI world, but they each bring something unique to the table. Claude, crafted by Anthropic AI, seems to bring a fresh, maybe even safer approach to AI interaction, which is super important considering all the concerns about AI going rogue. Then there's GPT-4 by OpenAI, which has been a favorite for a while because of its ability to handle a ton of different tasks.
    When we talk about Claude vs Chat GPT, it gets even more interesting. Each AI has its own vibe. Claude might be the new kid on the block, but it’s designed to be really safe and user-friendly, focusing a lot on understanding and responding in ways that seem more human. ChatGPT has been around and has proven itself to be super reliable, especially when you need a variety of responses or creative ideas.
    The involvement of Anthropic AI in developing Claude really highlights their goal to make AI that not only works well but also thinks about how the user wants to use the technology.
    With Claude 3 OPUS and GPT-4, the possibilities for what you can create and discover seem endless. It's like they're not just tools, but partners in the quest for knowledge. This could really shake up how we tackle projects and open up new ways to think about and interact with information.
    ................................................
    ▼ ▽ TIMESTAMPS
    00:00 What Is Claude 3 Opus?
    00:36 Claude Opus 3 Text Generation
    01:21 Can Claude Opus 3 Reccomend Papers?
    03:42 Claude Opus 3 Image Recognition
    05:01 Claude Opus 3 Mass Image Upload
    07:06 Claude Opus 3 AI Image Text Extraction
    08:36 Claude Opus 3 Analytics
    ................................................
    ▼ ▽ RECOMMENDED ACADEMIC TOOLS AND SERVICES
    ▶ Recommended Apps, Books and Courses: academiainsider.com/recommend...
    AI TOOLS
    ▶ Best PhD Writing Tool - Writefull - link.andrewstapleton.com.au/w... (Get 10% off with my link)
    ▶ Chat with PDFs, Websites and more: HeyGPT - heygpt.lemonsqueezy.com/?aff=...
    ▶ Best Literature Search - Litmaps - app.litmaps.co (Get 10% off with code STAPLETON)
    ▶ Best Literature Review Writing Tool - Jenni.ai - jenni.ai/ (Get 20% off with code ANDY20)
    ▼ ▽ RECOMMENDED UA-cam TOOLS AND SERVICES
    ▶ VidIQ - vidiq.com/drandy
    ▶ Camera - Canon EOS 650D amzn.to/3aDOog6
    ▶ On camera mic - amzn.to/3iMTzx0
    ▶ Webcam - amzn.to/43a8YyP
    ▶ Shotgun microphone - amzn.to/34gzcUX
    ▶ Portable recorder - amzn.to/3kUzF53
    ▶ Lighting - amzn.to/2YgbAfv
    ▼ ▽ Socials for shorts and reels
    Instagram: / drandystapleton
    TikTok: / drandystapleton

КОМЕНТАРІ • 63

  • @chunnaiyamspo5062
    @chunnaiyamspo5062 Місяць тому +44

    PLEASE DO A VIDEO ON FULL PROFESSORS WHO TAKE FIRST-AUTHORSHIPS IN PHD STUDENTS' WORK. THIS IS A HUGE SCAM IN ACADEMIA AND RESEARCH WHICH IS TOTALLY HUSHED UP AND UNADDRESSED.

  • @jazzli81
    @jazzli81 Місяць тому +25

    I have been using both AI platform. Personally, I prefer Claude than chat gpt for research purposes. Number of reasons but few things that I like it in most, summarization and the quality of written work. There is no over praising word on Claude for rephrasing sentences. Also better understanding whole document rather than gpt. Anyway I am satisfied with Claude.

    • @Dominik-lc4pl
      @Dominik-lc4pl Місяць тому +1

      How does Claude compare with Gemini on rephrasing text?

    • @jazzli81
      @jazzli81 Місяць тому +1

      @Dominik-lc4pl still Claude is better. Also, I am using a Gemini advance as well. Gemini is good at suggesting a better idea. However, written work or rephrasing quality is less than Claude. There were a lot of over praising word and unnecessary summarise the sentnece. Also, if you want to have a longer word count, gpt and Gemini create inappropriate content in order to fulfill count, but I found Claude was doing well for it too.

    • @Dominik-lc4pl
      @Dominik-lc4pl Місяць тому +1

      I recently used up my Gemini Advanced free trial while I had to finish up my thesis

    • @blackgptinfo
      @blackgptinfo Місяць тому +1

      Absolutely the flowery wording in gpt sucks even when asking not to do it

    • @user-rd2gu3xg7e
      @user-rd2gu3xg7e Місяць тому

      Definitely agree

  • @TaofiqAdeyemo-uq5no
    @TaofiqAdeyemo-uq5no Місяць тому +4

    Hi, that issue can be resolved by giving the affected papers a shorter name. It will work. Then try to remove any special characters.

  • @lc2c177
    @lc2c177 Місяць тому +2

    Leónidas from 300 would be jealous of that beard. Majestic.

  • @SaaSLTDDeals
    @SaaSLTDDeals Місяць тому +1

    Wow, the comparison between Claude and chat GPT is so thorough! It's fascinating to see the strengths and weaknesses of each platform for research purposes.

  • @FoxOkinawa
    @FoxOkinawa Місяць тому +8

    Claude is still responding with fictitious sources/references!

    • @lokidoki471
      @lokidoki471 Місяць тому +1

      i find it best when you supply it with your own research that you've gathered.

    • @anitadancs6278
      @anitadancs6278 14 днів тому +1

      In late May, I found three out of the five requested articles were hallucinations. I wish he would address that issue more. He's giving the impression that you can believe the articles exist.

  • @vugar_ibrahimov
    @vugar_ibrahimov Місяць тому +5

    Great tutorial as usual and Game Over ChatGPT ???
    Even free version of Claude is now my favourite tool now, it is better than Gemini too.
    The answers it gives sounds more natural and human.

  • @tedtan2754
    @tedtan2754 Місяць тому +2

    It works best when subscribed. Worth the money so far.

  • @africanscholarcorner6072
    @africanscholarcorner6072 Місяць тому

    Andy, you are simply awesome!

  • @whatisrokosbasilisk80
    @whatisrokosbasilisk80 Місяць тому +1

    Honestly kinda funny how well its memorized certain papers - sometimes can even reproduce the DOI, WITHOUT internet access

  • @ferfromla
    @ferfromla Місяць тому +2

    Tried to use it but it was impossible for me to use it as the registration process didn't work. It sent me a code on my phone but the code never worked.

  • @pavloshevchuk2454
    @pavloshevchuk2454 Місяць тому +1

    Andy, thank you for keeping me up with AI technologies.

  • @jamalnuman
    @jamalnuman Місяць тому

    Thank you for the very informative content. It would be great if your time allows to explaisn the following two queries:
    - When the following terms are synonyms and when are they distinct?
    1) Purpose, aim
    2) Objective, goals, scope,
    3) Justification, motivation, importance
    4) Problem statement, gap, rationale, hypothesis
    5) Problem, issue, challenge, obstacle,
    6) Drawback, pitfall, drawbacks, shortcomings, disadvantages, cons, limitations, weaknesses,
    7) Contribution, significance, novelty, originality, innovation
    8) Theoretical framework, conceptual framework, study framework, study flowchart, etc.
    9) Thesis\dissertation
    10) Preface, background, overview, context, executive summary,
    11) Conclusion, summary, etc.
    - What is the most common sequence of sections in the the dissertation\thesis structure in the introduction chapter?
    1) Overview (context\preface\etc.)
    2) Problem statement
    3) Aim
    4) Objective
    5) Questions
    6) Scope
    7) Contribution
    8) Thesis structure

  • @chrisb.1621
    @chrisb.1621 Місяць тому +1

    Please do a video about Meta-Analysis and KI. Thank you.

  • @hodhod9069
    @hodhod9069 Місяць тому +5

    Hi Andy, Just wanted to give you a solution to get rid of pop up massage after uploading a pdf. It is all about the name of the pdf. If it consists of " -, _, " this massage will show up if you change it to a simple name it will be fixed. :)

  • @rajanvk939
    @rajanvk939 Місяць тому

    Thank you 🙏 Andy for this wonderful content. Can you also make a comparison video of Gemini Advanced with chatGPT-4 for Research Context

  • @olivesostetrica3453
    @olivesostetrica3453 22 дні тому

    I'd absolutely love to have you as my lit review supervisor!
    I'm doing my first undergrad lit review on human factors in maternity care and haven't got a scooby where to start, we keep getting conflicting and confusing advice. Our supervision has been a major let-down regarding quality at my uni. We only get to submit two pieces of 500 words for assessment. I understand they have many other students to look at, but how it's set up/organised will inevitably let the students down. I think either AI programs or the links you've kindly provided are justified in this instance, but I will try chatGPT, so thank you for your review! 🙂

  • @bgill7475
    @bgill7475 Місяць тому +2

    I’ve been using Claude since last year, it’s amazing what they’ve managed to accomplish in this short amount of time.

  • @jackmaxwell3134
    @jackmaxwell3134 Місяць тому +2

    Other disadvantages of Claude compared to chatGPT:
    - the message limit: you'll hit very frequently. And it will ask you to wait for 5 hours (!) to ask again
    - the chat is really basic: you can't cancel an ongoing text generation, you can't quote part of its answer, LaTeX NOT SUPPORTED !!! etc...

    • @tar-yy3ub
      @tar-yy3ub Місяць тому +1

      the message limit changes literally hour by hour for different users based on how much people are using Claude, so often better than you describe but sometimes worse!

    • @citizen3000
      @citizen3000 Місяць тому

      They really need to match the features of CHAT GPT as soon as possible.

  • @ChristiaanRoest79
    @ChristiaanRoest79 2 дні тому

    I love Claude opus. I prefer it for my legal work over chatgpt

  • @mansoor.ashraf
    @mansoor.ashraf Місяць тому +1

    I have found Claude to be much better at chatting with pdfs. Though it does not have access to the web.

  • @sakibhossen00
    @sakibhossen00 Місяць тому

    How can I upload files in Chatgpt??

  • @jeremiasrobinson
    @jeremiasrobinson Місяць тому +1

    I asked Claude to recommend sources and provide citations too, but it did hallucinate. It gave me the names of real authors of similar papers, but with made up titles and dates.

    • @jeremiasrobinson
      @jeremiasrobinson Місяць тому

      Claude also told me it didn't have the ability to read PDFs. I told it that its webpage claims it can. It apologized, but still refused to read my PDFs.

  • @michen25
    @michen25 Місяць тому +1

    1:35 😂 crazy!

  • @i.aliende2088
    @i.aliende2088 Місяць тому

    Are you comparing with the 4 version of ChatGPT?

  • @blackgptinfo
    @blackgptinfo Місяць тому

    By the way i am talking about claude opus it is dope

  • @michen25
    @michen25 Місяць тому +1

    5:43 😂

  • @Vlr-nn2bk
    @Vlr-nn2bk Місяць тому +2

    Unfortunately not available for many countries

  • @mzahmed6533
    @mzahmed6533 Місяць тому

    Any AI that creates research model?

  • @davidvalencia6256
    @davidvalencia6256 Місяць тому +5

    Claude is much better with long pdfs, and he writes in a more objective way. I hate chatgpt's pompous way of writing.

  • @kolarek
    @kolarek Місяць тому

    Dear sir, you are my hero!

  • @blackgptinfo
    @blackgptinfo Місяць тому +1

    It absolutely is for qualitative. I created a structure prompt system for theme coding of transcripts. I also created a method for cross checking with snap assessments from humans and theme consistency with chat gpt

  • @tedtan2754
    @tedtan2754 Місяць тому +1

    Also, in what AI universe is Andy in that have chatgpt allowing the upload of images and documents? Is he comparing the paid versions or the free ones? Also, most of these tools allow you to reprompt them to give more detailed answers or to retry a different style of answering. Maybe he should have a disclaimer that the comparison he performs are based on the first/initial prompts. Because he uses an entertaining format of presentation, such nuance could be lost to audience with 3 min attention span.

    • @emileigh6524
      @emileigh6524 Місяць тому

      In the paid version you can upload files etc. I do it lol.

  • @ahmedmostafa247
    @ahmedmostafa247 Місяць тому +1

    Chatgpt and it's plugin ❤
    Game over

  • @TT-xg7qd
    @TT-xg7qd Місяць тому +1

    How to bypass plagairism?? Please need of it

  • @andresvillalpando3776
    @andresvillalpando3776 Місяць тому

    Difference in buying ChatGPT 4 vs AI free tools.

  • @rediffusion7996
    @rediffusion7996 Місяць тому +1

    You've good teeth. Is it veneers?
    Can you provide the link to your dentist?

  • @sajida5310
    @sajida5310 Місяць тому

    Hahaha 😂 heary ear 👂🤣

  • @citizen3000
    @citizen3000 Місяць тому

    Why are you shouting at us?

  • @fpgaguy
    @fpgaguy Місяць тому

    You're papers are too complicated, lol