The Polish-Russian Wars
Вставка
- Опубліковано 22 бер 2019
- This video shows the whole series of Polish-Russian wars that have ever occured to this day.
Even if not mentionned in the video, the white stars are representing the capitals of both countries : Cracow/Warsaw for Poland and Moscow/St-Petersburg for Russia.
------------------------------------------------------
Musics :
Kevin Macleod - Intermission
Kevin Macleod - Act Three
Kevin Macleod - Satiate (only percussions) - Розваги
I'm confused since Russia isn't green and Sweden isn't blue.
man of culture :D
*EU4 intensifies*
Maybe its because both where drunk and sweden was being a russia and russia was being sweden
Wut Russians flag never been green on it
@@anunciacionibanez1365 its an eu4 referance, polands territory color is red, russia is green and sweden is blue
Fun fact: if the Polish king became Orthodox, we would have commonwealth of 3 nations
It was the biggest Polish chance of luck. If the Polish king had become Orthodox, he would have been chosen to reign in Moscow. Then there would be a Polish-Russian state from the Baltic to the Pacific ocean. but the king refused, the chance was lost.
With Ivan the Ugly on the throne. ))
@@kotemura9090 Did you say about Ivan the Terrible? But it was because of Ivan the Terrible that this confusion began. Ivan the Terrible died in 1584. He left no heirs (the first son he himself killed with a blow to the head with a staff, the second-died in an accident). In Russia, there was no dynasty left, so the idea came to call the Polish king. But as you know, the Polish king refused to become Orthodox, as a result, the boyar Romanov became the king, which marked the beginning of the Romanov dynasty
@@mrOL100 Пасибо за просвещение, мужик. )))
@@mrOL100 actually, he was Ivan the Fearsome.
Hello to my Polish brothers and sisters. I’m from Russia, and I don’t want any more wars with you. Let’s go and drink vodka (yes, even here we’re complaining about who created it first and which one is the best, but anyways...) together instead and make a toast for peace!🇵🇱🇷🇺
:D
Tell this to Mr.Putin
What about comunism in Poland? From 1945 to 1989?
Lorakovaty It’s not my problem. I hate communism, so why would we unite together against leftist thoughts?
Arkar of Eyran I will:)
Listen, Russians. We've already had too many wars. Now let's get vodka and have fun together.
Yeah, greetings from Russia🇷🇺✌
@lastone oh my goodness why are so angry?
Polish and Russians are true Christians and Europeans, westerns lost their pride
Too sad politicians drive us to war everytime, Slavs should not fight slavs, slava to all Slavs!
@Mateusz Wilk who?
Next: French-German Wars?
150% discipline
Was going to write that. Let's do this!
Abi sen Yunanlılara özel yüzme dersi veren değil miydin ? Kralllll
@@sputnik7243 😂😂😂😂😂
Evet
@@statue1128 abi senin Instagram in yok mu birşeyler sormak istiyorum
1500-1700 Poland attacking Russia
1700-1939 Russia attacking Poland
1489 Poland tried to support Golden Horde to reoccupy Moscowy
@Hubert Turski Who exactly took half of Rus prior to 1492?
@Hubert Turski after the Mongol invasion, Rus was split into 2 parts, one of them was under a Golden horde, and the other fell under the influence of Lithuania. All wars in the territory of the Commonwealth or Lithuania were part of the unification of Ancient Rus lands. Only under Ivan Grozny did the expansion of the state begin. These processes are normal for any state at that time. There is no one to apologize to. And there is no one to excuses. In addition, Poland showed aggression against Russia.
@Hubert Turski
The desire of Ivan the third to conquer the Principality was dictated not only by his personality, but also by the desire of the Moscow principality to unite those lands that were part of Rus, but were subjugated either by Lithuania or the Horde.The population of these Principalities and their language were almost the same.
There was no Russia under Ivan the Third. There was only a Moscow principality, which annexed the territory through military capture or diplomacy.
In addition, Lithuania did not conquer the Russian principalities by any means in a peaceful way. For this reason, this side cannot be called any good or bad. Imperialism is inherent in many European states - Russia, Poland, England, Kaiser Germany, France and many others. T
urkey too.Or do you think that in these countries imperialism arose also because of the Mongols?
@Hubert Turski I think that when you take into account the “important” facts, you miss the real reasons for the conflicts between Moscow (later Russia) and Lithuania. Lithuania fought with the Old Russian state until the collapse of the latter. And just after the defeat of the Vladimir-Suzdal principality from the Mongols, Lithuania was successful and was able to capture a number of Old Russian lands in the 13-14 centuries. This fact is also important. Russian principalities were torn apart by the war with the Horde and could not resist Lithuania. Therefore, it is wrong to consider the Moscow principality the instigator of the war with Lithuania, and then with Poland. The fact that Russia had imperialism in more or less than that of other countries is just sophistry and subjective perception.
Mongolian influence takes place in the philosophy of Russian tsars, but this influence is not the prevalent. Any state can develop and conquer land, as long as it has the resources and centralizations for expansion and holding positions. The state of Poland and Lithuania, which had 2 different armies, two financial flows, and 2 cultural centers, could not be effective. In addition, he had too many strong neighbors and no allies. Sad but true.
Interesting fact: if you read the slogans of the Bolsheviks, you will see that they were directed against imperialism in Russia and around the world. Therefore, the crimes of Soviet goverment are not connected with imperialism.
To say that the Moscow Principality and the Russian Empire committed crimes more than other states is strange. This position applies only to the USSR. German Reich and Turkey are on the same line thanks to the genocide of Armenians and Jews
Nobody:
Poland: we controled over Moscow for nearly 3 years
@@loma_pl1931 shhhhhh
@@loma_pl1931 only part of poland, and only for 150 years max.
Always 50/50 with the Germans
@@IGNACY-fp8zo
Not always.
@@IGNACY-fp8zo More like 50% of Poland don't wish to be Slavic
what a great and informative video
These videos are awesome and so welll made, greetings from Chile!
2:51
Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth: I can into Moscow!
Tsardom of Russia: no
12:55
CCCP: I can into Warsa-
Poland: no
it’s part of the slavic genes
USSR*
Jewish bolsheviks
@@orrismate139 CCCP means USSR
That thin land of occupation was similar to that of Napoleons but shorter
Love and respect to Poland from Turkey. Despite the fact that we had fought for some time, we had and have a good relationship between us. We never recognized the partition of Poland, always had a place for your deputy.
+Where is the deputy from Lehistan?
-Your Excellency, the deputy of Lehistan could not make it because of vital impediments.
I heard that in school. Big love from Poland.
Turkey has my respect. Powerful and honorable. Greetings from Poland.
tbh I guess only the fact that Ottoman empire was declining itself led them not to recognize the partition.
A hundred or so years before that would not be the case.
So your Turkish, well this joke will make you laugh like hell. Vienna, did you get it?
You are 100% correct. That is why we will always respect Turkey. You were a formidable oponent and now a great friend. Respect to Turkey from Poland!!!
I'm from Russia. Love Poland ❤
Let's not fight anymore, please :3
Russia doesnt want more war,problem is putin.
@@basementkidd6818 For westerners problem is any good Russian leader.
@@Pravover good lider focuses on providing economic growth, and Putin = Stagnation. Crimea already cost Russian economy 10-11% of GDP poossible growth, due to sanctions and new taxation imployed to combat them.
@@MaycroftCholmsky I am adult man. And I remember the life in Russia in 1980-90 BEFORE Putin. And I can compare with life now. I have to said - Russians never lives as good as with Putin in rule. The Life is really BETTER than was before. Understood?
@@MaycroftCholmsky You're forgetting that before those sanctions, under Putin Russia's economy was booming.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_history_of_the_Russian_Federation#2000%E2%80%932007
"Under the presidency of Vladimir Putin Russia's economy saw the nominal Gross Domestic Product (GDP) double, climbing from 22nd to 11th largest in the world. The economy made real gains of an average 7% per year (2000: 10%, 2001: 5.1%, 2002: 4.7%, 2003: 7.3%, 2004: 7.2%, 2005: 6.4%, 2006: 8.2%, 2007: 8.5%, 2008: 5.6%), making it the 6th largest economy in the world in GDP(PPP)...During Putin's eight years in office, industry grew by 75%, investments increased by 125%,[9] and agricultural production and construction increased as well. Real incomes more than doubled and the average salary increased eightfold from $80 to $640.[10][11][12] The volume of consumer credit between 2000-2006 increased 45 times,[13][14] and during that same time period, the middle class grew from 8 million to 55 million, an increase of 7 times. The number of people living below the poverty line also decreased from 30% in 2000 to 14% in 2008."
Great job !
Thank you !
And a like from Germany... Poland really DESERVES to be a country like now. And come on.. East Germans are partly Slavic too (remember the assimilated tribes of Heveller, Spreewanen, Obodriten, Redarier, we still have the Sorben tribe). The border between us ist just fortuitously drawn by useless wars, it's not genetically.
2:24 poland can into moskow
Yes, that were times of starvation, crisis and civil war in Russia, this is only one reason why polish forces were in Moscow.
@Oskar Rosa shit is you.
@Flatearth XXI russians is mongols? The same i seen in ukrainian TV programmes...
@@arty5876 dude, don't fight the entire troll army of the Internet :)
Btw Poland in 1795 fell for the same reason. The difference was Poland in 1612 acted alone.
@Flatearth XXI in russian territory lives 210 + nations. Nents, Chucks, Buryats, Don cassacks , Yaits cassacks, tatars( european mongols), ingushes, ugrs, and 200 more. This is not mongols, they were occupied by Mongolia, and as a result of russo-mongolian wars became part of Russia. Only 15% of russian territories is territories of Golden Horde, this is all South Russia from Baikal to Caspia (Siberian khanate, Kazan' Khanate) .
Slavic people should not fight any more.
It's in our blood.
@Anoli Suteim There is nothing better than war.
@@gamergrill4933 give Israel to Palestinian and alotta other countries sh it needs to be fixed
But this is what slavic people do
@@gamergrill4933 Why should the give kosovo and albanian country since ever to Serbia?
And albanians are not slawic tribe wtf
Thank you for enlightening me on my polish ancestors. Much love from Canada
You could also show Napoleons invasion on Russia, as polish state - Duchy of Warsaw - was involved in it. Anyway I hope you will create extended version of this video including Russian-Lithuanian Wars and maybe polish wars with Rus' (981, 1018, 1022, 1031, 1074, 1077, 1340-1392, 1487-94, 1500 - 1503, 1507 - 1508, 1512 - 1522, 1534 - 1537, this is the most important, se en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_Poland for all). This looks like it is many wars, but majority of them would last something like 20s on screen + text before.
Great video! Please make also : Polish-German wars, British colonial wars, French-German wars and Mongol wars.
About Poland, actually the only wars with united Germany were ww1 and 2. That is it
@@Ponanoix And few wars with Holy Roman Empire in X and XI century.
@@Ponanoix Poles fought against germans for a very short time in 1918 but in ww1 most of them were fighting in German army
@@bakers2366 poland didn't exist in ww1
@@ByzantineBall after germany defeated Russia they established a puppet government in Poland (it could have been free I don't remember exaxtly)
France and Germany: WE'LL OCCUPY MOSCOW AND RUSSIA WILL SURRENDER
Poland: been there, didn't work
@SursumCordaVivatRzplita Tak czy owak miał to być rodzaj federacji. Gdyby wtedy się udało, to mielibyśmy pewnie do dziś federację polsko-rosyjską i niepodległe kraje azjatyckiej części Rosji. Prawdopodobnie Rosjanie w naturalny sposób by się częściowo polonizowali, podobnie jak działo się to ze sporą częścią Litwinów. No i byłby spokój, bo nie byłoby światowego gangstera.
@@LewicowyPatriotanie bądź głupi, spójrz na każdy duży kraj w historii, z wielką Polską, Polska po prostu zastąpiłaby Rosję jako globalny gangstera
No brother wars anymore, respect to Poland from Russia! )
@@kenjijor зачем за всех говорить? Тут разные поляки пишут. Не заостряйте внимания только на дерьме. Нам нужно поучиться у Польши национализму
Spierdalaj
@@Kris-vh1ck no u
@@kenjijor я тоже русский дарова
So stop fighting your Ukrainian "brothers". Disrespect from Poland.
can you make Austro-Turkish wars ?
There was just 3 of them
@Cool Yellow Guy yes
Onu yapan bi Türk mapper vardı yapım aşamasında
Poland-Lithuania help them
Poland-Lithuania saved Austria and Europe from the Turks
It would be interesting if you could add Napoleon the man that took Poland from Prussia and show how Prussia lost this land but still have some other territories that where apart of Poland
We have Napoleon in Polish anthem and we conquered moscow togeather in 1812
But then the Russians revolted because they don’t want and occupied holy city by catholic ones
Actually a good video but there are some mistakes. When Poland conquered Moscow in the war of 1609-1618, the son of the Polish king became Tsar of Russia. Therefore, on the map at that time, the territory of Russia should have been marked as the territory ruled by Poland. A large part of the Russian nobility wanted to submit to the new tsar from Poland. Unfortunately, because of the king's incompetence mainly religious intolerance , Poland lost control of Russia. Despite losing control of Russia, the Polish Empire was able to conquer important areas such as the city of Smolensk.
Which is also a mistake to mention the Polish Bolshevik War in the list of Polish-Russian wars. Because the Polish-Bolshevik War was not a Polish-Russian war, since the enemy were international communists and not just Russian communists. Many important Bolshevik officials were not Russian. Lazar Kaganovich was a Jew! He was the head of the bolshevik government of Tashkent! Solomon Lozovsky was Jewish! He was the executive of Communist International. Semyon Dimanstein was Jewish! He played a central role in the work of the People's Commissariat of Nationalities. Adolph Joffe was a Crimean Tatar! He was People's Commissar (minister) of State Control of the Ukrainian. Lazar Kaganowitsch was Jewish! He was the First Secretary of the Communist Party of Ukraine. Grigory Sokolnikov was Jewish! He was posted to Central Asia as chairman of the government of Turkestan and commander of the Turkestan army! Yakov Sverdlov was Jewish! He worked to consolidate Bolshevik control of newly conquered territories and coordinated there the Red Terror campaigns. He also played a major role in authorising the execution of the Romanov royal family in July 1918. Lev Kamenev was Jewish! He was President of the Council of People's Commissars and Politburo chairman. Yakov Yurovsky was Jewish! He was Chief of the Gold Department of the State Treasury. The commanders of the Red Army were also international! Leon Trotsky was Jewish. He headed the Red Army as People's Commissar for Military and Naval Affairs. Sergey Kamenev was Ukrainian! He was commander in chief of the red army and the most important man in the red army after Trotsky. Joseph Stalin was Georgian! Commander of the Southwest Front! Mikhail Alafuso was Ukrainian! He was Chief of Staff of the 3 Army. August Kork was an Estonian! He was the commander of the 6th Army. Hayk Bzhishkyan was Armenian! He was commander of the III Cavalry Corps. Nikolai Sollogub was Belarusian! Commander of the 16th Army! Ivar Smilga was a Latvian! He headed the Revolutionary Military Council of the Western Front. By the way, apart from the fact that they were all international Bolsheviks, they had something else in common! They were all defeated by the Poles in the 1919-21 war. In any case, I could go on and on with the list of international Bolshevik officials and officers showing that this was not a fight against Russia, but against international Communism. Which is why this war of 1919-21 should properly be called the Polish Bolshevik War and not the Polish Russian War.
I continue the comment below!
Another mistake in the video is that the wrong term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was used. Which unfortunately is a standard error. The use of this term is incorrect for two reasons! The first reason why the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is incorrect is the fact that the incorrect use of the term Commonwealth gives the impression that the Polish state has some kind of legal basis for the equality and equal status of Poles and Lithuanians as the incorrect term Commonwealth would suggest. But this state was not a kind of legal basis for the equality and equal status of Poles and Lithuanians as the wrong term Commonwealth suggests. So the Rzeczpospolita was not a kind of legal basis for the equality and equal status of Poles and Lithuanians. Because that was a Polish Empire and not a Polish Lithuanian Empire. Poles dominated all peoples of the empire. Because the Poles completely dominated this state and were imperial ruling ethnic group. The Poles dominated the entire state! So also Lithuania. There was no equality whatsoever as the wrong term "common wealth" suggests. Polish wealth was always crucial. So if anything then Polishwealth and not Commonwealth. The state took over the Polish constitution Nihil Novi in1505 and not a Lithuanian constitution. Thi imperial constitution of 1505 was the actual founding of the Rzeczpospolita. Determined by the Polish Parliament Sejm! That the Poles dominated the state is also clearly shown by the name of the state. The ruling Poles have also determined what the state should be called Polisch Rzeczpospolita! But even before the establishment of the Rzeczpospolita Poland was an empire and then during the time of the Rzeczpospolita, Poland continued to be an empire! That was actually just the founding of the Polish noble Republic democracy by the Polish nobility. Which, amazingly, was nevertheless a monarchy with a king elected by the nobility!So the founding of the Polish monarchical noble republic as an elective monarchy. It was revolutionary at that time, because 10%-15% of the population, which was the Polish nobility at that time, had the power for the internal affairs of the state. In the rest of Europe, the proportion of the population of the nobility was 1% of the population and not 10-15% as in Poland. In the rest of Europe, with the exception of England and some Italian republics, monarchs ruled despotically. So otherwise despots rule everywhere! The revolutionary constitution Nihil Novi in 1505 passed by the Polish parliament applied to the entire Polish Empire as well as to Lithuania. Through this revolutionary constitution Nihil Novi in 1505, Poland became the Rzeczpospolita Nobles' Democracy! The state was no longer called the Kingdom of Poland, but the most serene (most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland. The constitution was the primary element of the democratic governance in the Polish kingdom which granted Parliament extensive powers. The Parliament (Sejm) was a powerful political institution and the king could not pass most of laws without the approval of that body.
The second reason why the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is wrong is the fact that it is a mistranslation of the Polish term Rzeczpospolita as I mentioned. So this term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is wrong! This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern, nonsensical invention by 20th century historians that does not correspond to reality. This state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. NEVER! Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. The correct translation for Rzeczpospolita is Republic and certainly not Commonwealth. In other languages it is also correctly translated as a republic, but in English it is always translated incorrectly as Commonwealth. The wrong translation is used again and again. But even today, Poland calls itself Rzeczpospolita Polska, which is actually the official Polish name of the state! Lithuania doesn't call itself that way. Because in reality, Poland was the Rzeczpospolita in earlier times and is that still today! Not Polish Lithuanian Rzeczpospolita but the Polska Rzeczpospolita! Would anyone call Poland today Commonwealth because Poland today is Rzeczpospolita? Of course not, because it is wrong today as it was wrong in the past to call this Polish state Commonwealth! Today Rzeczpospolita Polska is also correctly translated in English as the Republic of Poland and not wrong Commonwealth Poland! Why is that then wrongly translated with Commonwealth for the earlier times. Actually absurd! Incidentally, the first documented with the use of the term Rzeczpospolit as a designation of the Polish state can be found in Maćka Borkowica's act of allegiance, for the Polish king Kazimierz the Great on 16. February 1358 in the town of Sieradz. At that time Lithuania was not yet united with Poland at all! So the Polisch term Rzeczpospolit was the name for Poland even then. Because even then the Polish nobility took the first steps towards becoming a noble republic! By the way, the state from back then is generally referred to in Poland as the 1st Polish Republic so the 1st Polish Rzeczpospolita in Polish I Polska Rzeczpospolita. Then in Polish, II Polska Rzeczpospolita is called the Polish Republic between the wars. The III Polska Rzeczpospolita is then the republic for the Poles from 1989 after the liberation from the soviet occupation. The by the communist henchmen so-called Polish People's Republic (in Polish Polska Rzeczpospolita Ludowa) to which Poland was forced by the Soviets, is not recognized by the Poles as a Polish Rzeczpospolita and therefore there are 3 Rzeczpospolitas and not 4. However generally in Poland the first Polish republic is recognized as the I Polska Rzeczpospolita from the 16th century. This republic is not called in Poland Polish Lithuanian Rzeczpospolita but only Polish Rzeczpospolita (republic). Because that was above all a Polish state and a Polish empire! Before that it was also a Polish Kingdom and Empire!
The term Rzeczpospolita seems difficult to pronounce for non-Poles. But that is not the case at all. With a little practice, anyone can pronounce the term correctly, even you. A little help: Rz is pronounced like the "isi" in vision. So virzon sounds like vision. Cz sounds like the "ch" in church. So Czurcz sounds like church. But if one just use "sh" instead of "rz", that sounds close to Polish. "Ch" can be used instead of "cz". With these clues, everyone can probably read the term Rzeczpospolita. The Anglicized term Shechpospolita could also be used as an alternative. So Shechpospolita would be written in English, which could be pronounced without problems. So there is no reason not to use this correct term Rzeczpospolita or Shechpospolita.
By the way, the Polish Empire could also be used as an alternative to Rzeczpospolita for this state if one wants to use a modern term. Because that was a Polish Empire and not a Polish Lithuanian Empire. Because the Poles completely dominated this state and were the rulers.
So just a wrong translation and the false claim about equality and equal status of Poland and Lithuania that didn't exist! Because that was a Polish empire controlled by Poles.
Stephen Báthory (or Báthory István) is one of my favourite rulers. Too bad that because of his wars with Russia as a Polish-Lithuanian king he didn't have the opportunity to accomplish his dream: to liberate Hungary from the Turkish occupation with the strenght of the united army of his Polish-Lithuanian-Transylvanian dominions. Nice video.
I was just wondering myself if "Batory" (spelling in this video) was "Bathory" .. and if there was a relation to Elizabeth Bathory, AKA "the Blood Countess".
@@thememoryhole9355 stephan Bathory is her brother
Stefan Batory, not Stephen Bathory
@@drcasualties I don't know if your realize, but "Stefan Batory" is a polonized name of the Hungarian "Báthory István" (English: Stephen Báthory), and since Batory wasn't Polish it's not right for you to correct him in that matter. I'm Polish too by the way.
@@filipkogut8533 jesli jestes Polakiem to pisz do mnie po polsku. Batory był był królem Polski i książęciem siedmiogrodu, nie brytyjskim monarchą, wiec proszę nie pisać, ze nazywał się „Stephen”. Tyle w temacie.
Anglo-French/Franco-British Wars? Anglo-Scottish Wars would be nice to see as well!
These videos are awsome you should deffinently cover the Byzantine-Bulgarian or the Byzantine-Persian wars
The Roman-Persian wars could be indeed a great idea. :)
What about Bulgaria we are ancient country with a tons of history ? Come on we are older state than greece
@@-unionforhelptothepoorpeople you're not. Your country exists since medieval times while Greece is ancient.
@@unknown12367 Greece exist since 1830. Everything in your history is faked!!! You are black African colonisator from Ethiopia. Germany and Russia (Muscov!y). Bulgaria is the oldest country in the world. We have created the human civilization!!!
It is not bad at all, but it could be better. You tried to concentrate on two states, but you ignored lots of the important context (f.ex., cosak uprising or dynastic quarters), so it is hard to understand all this map changes.
I didn't know that Polish people were lucky because the Russians didn't wipe out their race like what the Turks did to Armenians, Greeks, Assyrians and Kurds.
They partially did. 1.5 million Polish citizens were sent to Gulags after 1939 invasion. Most of them perished
@@SSPanzee Что за бред?) Столько примерно было отправлено в ГУЛАГ только за все существование СССР... О каких 1,5 миллионах поляков ты говоришь? Там были и русские, украинцы, литовцы, беларусы и другие. Все пострадали от репрессий, это нельзя отрицать, но и преувеличивать тоже не надо. Мне конечно стыдно говорить это, но множество поляков отправили немцам...
@@SSPanzee kind of lesser, and it was social genocide, not total like what had happened to christian population of Eastern Anatolia
USSR was never polonophobic, since every soviet policeman had a portrait of polish person in his cabinet
Щас бы СССР считать русским государством)
I think you should cover Ottoman-Persian wars or Russian-Persian wars after this
What about the battles during Euro 2012 and other sport events? Pretty inaccurate, man!
xD
xddd
Let’s settle matters in the Eurovision Song Contest
@@stolzerpfalzer768Too bad Russia was given the boot
We wait for Ger2024, chujowo że was Nie ma ;(
As a Polish history maniac (Mostly the world wars rather than medieval and ancient stuff) it honestly really pisses me off how dumb our kings were, Poland literally lost only because of the idiotism of our kings and rulers and i could count good rulers on the fingers of my left hand.
Middle Ages honestly is so much more interesting, arguably the strongest country in Europe during that time
Lithuania had most the strength and land though! Not Poland!
@@tarashery You do realize you dumb fuck that Lithuania is literally a Polish colony and you guys would never even fucking dream of independence without us? Lithuania is such a weak nation that literally Polish government could snap their fingers and send our military to Lithuania and literally make it dissapear from the face of earth.
@@tarashery poland was stronger economicly and militarly.
@V Turkey is cool, despite our countries fighting in the history we still respected each other as good enemies.
Greetings from Turkey to Poland . Two brave Nations . We Love you so much Poland 🇹🇷❤️🇵🇱
Нехорошо так, они сами оккупировали Русь после распада в 1132 году а мы лишь вновь объединяли русский народ, турки нам не враги, зачем же так!?
@@user-ur9ru5iy3s они и не друзья. С такими друзьями.. как говорится.
My guy made a positive comment man just take a fucking compliment
And both was fuck by Russia
lol
Ah yes from poland love to turkey too 🇵🇱♥️🇹🇷
Powerful nations. Respect to both from Turkey
Poland powerful ? LMAO.
@@battlehelicopter914 Haven't you watched the video? They had the upper hand against the Russians before partitions, and remember Russia was not alone in partitions of Poland. Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was surely one of the strongest nations of Europe at its peak.
@@sleros8646 Prussia, Russian empire, Austrian empire, Soviet Union, Russian tsardom, British empire, France, German empire, Third reic, Holy roman empire and Roman empire its createst European countries.
@@battlehelicopter914 They were all strong. What is your point? Poland-Lithuania was very strong until 18th century.
@Oskar Rosa For Russia and Prussia its free territories.
I think it is necessary to mention the Duchy of Warsaw, which existed in 1807-1813. His troops participated in the campaign of Napoleon in Russia in 1812, therefore this war is also partly Polish-Russian. If this is not done, it will be unclear, what a way the part of Poland, which was conquered in 1794 by Prussia, in 1830 became part of the Russian Empire.
Napoleon even called his campaign second polish war or something
Pretty sure that was a French puppet state
Actually a good video but there are some mistakes. When Poland conquered Moscow in the war of 1609-1618, the son of the Polish king became Tsar of Russia. Therefore, on the map at that time, the territory of Russia should have been marked as the territory ruled by Poland. A large part of the Russian nobility wanted to submit to the new tsar from Poland. Unfortunately, because of the king's incompetence mainly religious intolerance , Poland lost control of Russia. Despite losing control of Russia, the Polish Empire was able to conquer important areas such as the city of Smolensk.
Which is also a mistake to mention the Polish Bolshevik War in the list of Polish-Russian wars. Because the Polish-Bolshevik War was not a Polish-Russian war, since the enemy were international communists and not just Russian communists. Many important Bolshevik officials were not Russian. Lazar Kaganovich was a Jew! He was the head of the bolshevik government of Tashkent! Solomon Lozovsky was Jewish! He was the executive of Communist International. Semyon Dimanstein was Jewish! He played a central role in the work of the People's Commissariat of Nationalities. Adolph Joffe was a Crimean Tatar! He was People's Commissar (minister) of State Control of the Ukrainian. Lazar Kaganowitsch was Jewish! He was the First Secretary of the Communist Party of Ukraine. Grigory Sokolnikov was Jewish! He was posted to Central Asia as chairman of the government of Turkestan and commander of the Turkestan army! Yakov Sverdlov was Jewish! He worked to consolidate Bolshevik control of newly conquered territories and coordinated there the Red Terror campaigns. He also played a major role in authorising the execution of the Romanov royal family in July 1918. Lev Kamenev was Jewish! He was President of the Council of People's Commissars and Politburo chairman. Yakov Yurovsky was Jewish! He was Chief of the Gold Department of the State Treasury. The commanders of the Red Army were also international! Leon Trotsky was Jewish. He headed the Red Army as People's Commissar for Military and Naval Affairs. Sergey Kamenev was Ukrainian! He was commander in chief of the red army and the most important man in the red army after Trotsky. Joseph Stalin was Georgian! Commander of the Southwest Front! Mikhail Alafuso was Ukrainian! He was Chief of Staff of the 3 Army. August Kork was an Estonian! He was the commander of the 6th Army. Hayk Bzhishkyan was Armenian! He was commander of the III Cavalry Corps. Nikolai Sollogub was Belarusian! Commander of the 16th Army! Ivar Smilga was a Latvian! He headed the Revolutionary Military Council of the Western Front. By the way, apart from the fact that they were all international Bolsheviks, they had something else in common! They were all defeated by the Poles in the 1919-21 war. In any case, I could go on and on with the list of international Bolshevik officials and officers showing that this was not a fight against Russia, but against international Communism. Which is why this war of 1919-21 should properly be called the Polish Bolshevik War and not the Polish Russian War.
I continue the comment below!
Another mistake in the video is that the wrong term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was used. Which unfortunately is a standard error. The use of this term is incorrect for two reasons! The first reason why the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is incorrect is the fact that the incorrect use of the term Commonwealth gives the impression that the Polish state has some kind of legal basis for the equality and equal status of Poles and Lithuanians as the incorrect term Commonwealth would suggest. But this state was not a kind of legal basis for the equality and equal status of Poles and Lithuanians as the wrong term Commonwealth suggests. So the Rzeczpospolita was not a kind of legal basis for the equality and equal status of Poles and Lithuanians. Because that was a Polish Empire and not a Polish Lithuanian Empire. Poles dominated all peoples of the empire. Because the Poles completely dominated this state and were imperial ruling ethnic group. The Poles dominated the entire state! So also Lithuania. There was no equality whatsoever as the wrong term "common wealth" suggests. Polish wealth was always crucial. So if anything then Polishwealth and not Commonwealth. The state took over the Polish constitution Nihil Novi in1505 and not a Lithuanian constitution. Thi imperial constitution of 1505 was the actual founding of the Rzeczpospolita. Determined by the Polish Parliament Sejm! That the Poles dominated the state is also clearly shown by the name of the state. The ruling Poles have also determined what the state should be called Polisch Rzeczpospolita! But even before the establishment of the Rzeczpospolita Poland was an empire and then during the time of the Rzeczpospolita, Poland continued to be an empire! That was actually just the founding of the Polish noble Republic democracy by the Polish nobility. Which, amazingly, was nevertheless a monarchy with a king elected by the nobility!So the founding of the Polish monarchical noble republic as an elective monarchy. It was revolutionary at that time, because 10%-15% of the population, which was the Polish nobility at that time, had the power for the internal affairs of the state. In the rest of Europe, the proportion of the population of the nobility was 1% of the population and not 10-15% as in Poland. In the rest of Europe, with the exception of England and some Italian republics, monarchs ruled despotically. So otherwise despots rule everywhere! The revolutionary constitution Nihil Novi in 1505 passed by the Polish parliament applied to the entire Polish Empire as well as to Lithuania. Through this revolutionary constitution Nihil Novi in 1505, Poland became the Rzeczpospolita Nobles' Democracy! The state was no longer called the Kingdom of Poland, but the most serene (most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland. The constitution was the primary element of the democratic governance in the Polish kingdom which granted Parliament extensive powers. The Parliament (Sejm) was a powerful political institution and the king could not pass most of laws without the approval of that body.
The second reason why the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is wrong is the fact that it is a mistranslation of the Polish term Rzeczpospolita as I mentioned. So this term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is wrong! This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern, nonsensical invention by 20th century historians that does not correspond to reality. This state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. NEVER! Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. The correct translation for Rzeczpospolita is Republic and certainly not Commonwealth. In other languages it is also correctly translated as a republic, but in English it is always translated incorrectly as Commonwealth. The wrong translation is used again and again. But even today, Poland calls itself Rzeczpospolita Polska, which is actually the official Polish name of the state! Lithuania doesn't call itself that way. Because in reality, Poland was the Rzeczpospolita in earlier times and is that still today! Not Polish Lithuanian Rzeczpospolita but the Polska Rzeczpospolita! Would anyone call Poland today Commonwealth because Poland today is Rzeczpospolita? Of course not, because it is wrong today as it was wrong in the past to call this Polish state Commonwealth! Today Rzeczpospolita Polska is also correctly translated in English as the Republic of Poland and not wrong Commonwealth Poland! Why is that then wrongly translated with Commonwealth for the earlier times. Actually absurd! Incidentally, the first documented with the use of the term Rzeczpospolit as a designation of the Polish state can be found in Maćka Borkowica's act of allegiance, for the Polish king Kazimierz the Great on 16. February 1358 in the town of Sieradz. At that time Lithuania was not yet united with Poland at all! So the Polisch term Rzeczpospolit was the name for Poland even then. Because even then the Polish nobility took the first steps towards becoming a noble republic! By the way, the state from back then is generally referred to in Poland as the 1st Polish Republic so the 1st Polish Rzeczpospolita in Polish I Polska Rzeczpospolita. Then in Polish, II Polska Rzeczpospolita is called the Polish Republic between the wars. The III Polska Rzeczpospolita is then the republic for the Poles from 1989 after the liberation from the soviet occupation. The by the communist henchmen so-called Polish People's Republic (in Polish Polska Rzeczpospolita Ludowa) to which Poland was forced by the Soviets, is not recognized by the Poles as a Polish Rzeczpospolita and therefore there are 3 Rzeczpospolitas and not 4. However generally in Poland the first Polish republic is recognized as the I Polska Rzeczpospolita from the 16th century. This republic is not called in Poland Polish Lithuanian Rzeczpospolita but only Polish Rzeczpospolita (republic). Because that was above all a Polish state and a Polish empire! Before that it was also a Polish Kingdom and Empire!
The term Rzeczpospolita seems difficult to pronounce for non-Poles. But that is not the case at all. With a little practice, anyone can pronounce the term correctly, even you. A little help: Rz is pronounced like the "isi" in vision. So virzon sounds like vision. Cz sounds like the "ch" in church. So Czurcz sounds like church. But if one just use "sh" instead of "rz", that sounds close to Polish. "Ch" can be used instead of "cz". With these clues, everyone can probably read the term Rzeczpospolita. The Anglicized term Shechpospolita could also be used as an alternative. So Shechpospolita would be written in English, which could be pronounced without problems. So there is no reason not to use this correct term Rzeczpospolita or Shechpospolita.
By the way, the Polish Empire could also be used as an alternative to Rzeczpospolita for this state if one wants to use a modern term. Because that was a Polish Empire and not a Polish Lithuanian Empire. Because the Poles completely dominated this state and were the rulers.
So just a wrong translation and the false claim about equality and equal status of Poland and Lithuania that didn't exist! Because that was a Polish empire controlled by Poles.
@@GreatPolishWingedHussarshe was never been tsar of Russia
Poland ❤️ from Turkey 🇹🇷
Go back to mongloia Colonizer, anatolia belongs to greeks and armenians,
Güzel Ataroach no :) anatolia belongs to turkish people
Thank you , have a nice day.
@@SillyUwUBilly 🇹🇷❤️🇵🇱
@@guzelataroach4450 sende türksün kes sesini
Poland: Kurwa!!!
Russia: Cyka Blyat!!!
Вот сука! Ты прав.
Blya!
Kovi: Koi
And what?
@mateusz w I am Polish but I rather Germans than Russians
Très bonne video de qualité et un travail bien fourni! Il autait été en ore mieux en bonus que soient montrés les territoires contrôlés par le Tsar Faux Dmitri II en 1609-10; ainsi que la république socialiste de Lithuanie-Biélorussie soit coloriée en bleu, comme tu l'avais fait pour la RSS ukrainienne (dont les frontières bougeaient beaucoup plus au sud à cause des combats contre l'Ukraine et les Blancs) mais c'est un excellent travail!
Советско - польская война неправильно показано, в то время был открыт еще крымский и кавказский фронт, и у советов тех земель еще не было даже и близко
Can you make the Polish-Turkish Wars???
In fact, until polish aristocrats didn’t rise up, Tsardom of Poland had a lot of autonomy.
Kingdom of Poland *
@@Tuskoid88 in russian it was called Polish Tsardom or Tsardom of Poland...
In 1794 the leader of the uprising was called Tadeusz Kościuszko 9:21
In 1863 the leaders of the uprising were called: Romuald Traugutt, Marian Langiewicz etc... it's honestly hard to say who was the real leader of the whole uprising because Polish Insurgents didn't had any regular army and generals were leading their army in their own way. 11:21
Well done! Good to remember these Polish heroes! By the way, that is actually a good video but there are some mistakes. When Poland conquered Moscow in the war of 1609-1618, the son of the Polish king became Tsar of Russia. Therefore, on the map at that time, the territory of Russia should have been marked as the territory ruled by Poland. A large part of the Russian nobility wanted to submit to the new tsar from Poland. Unfortunately, because of the king's incompetence mainly religious intolerance , Poland lost control of Russia. Despite losing control of Russia, the Polish Empire was able to conquer important areas such as the city of Smolensk.
Which is also a mistake to mention the Polish Bolshevik War in the list of Polish-Russian wars. Because the Polish-Bolshevik War was not a Polish-Russian war, since the enemy were international communists and not just Russian communists. Many important Bolshevik officials were not Russian. Lazar Kaganovich was a Jew! He was the head of the bolshevik government of Tashkent! Solomon Lozovsky was Jewish! He was the executive of Communist International. Semyon Dimanstein was Jewish! He played a central role in the work of the People's Commissariat of Nationalities. Adolph Joffe was a Crimean Tatar! He was People's Commissar (minister) of State Control of the Ukrainian. Lazar Kaganowitsch was Jewish! He was the First Secretary of the Communist Party of Ukraine. Grigory Sokolnikov was Jewish! He was posted to Central Asia as chairman of the government of Turkestan and commander of the Turkestan army! Yakov Sverdlov was Jewish! He worked to consolidate Bolshevik control of newly conquered territories and coordinated there the Red Terror campaigns. He also played a major role in authorising the execution of the Romanov royal family in July 1918. Lev Kamenev was Jewish! He was President of the Council of People's Commissars and Politburo chairman. Yakov Yurovsky was Jewish! He was Chief of the Gold Department of the State Treasury. The commanders of the Red Army were also international! Leon Trotsky was Jewish. He headed the Red Army as People's Commissar for Military and Naval Affairs. Sergey Kamenev was Ukrainian! He was commander in chief of the red army and the most important man in the red army after Trotsky. Joseph Stalin was Georgian! Commander of the Southwest Front! Mikhail Alafuso was Ukrainian! He was Chief of Staff of the 3 Army. August Kork was an Estonian! He was the commander of the 6th Army. Hayk Bzhishkyan was Armenian! He was commander of the III Cavalry Corps. Nikolai Sollogub was Belarusian! Commander of the 16th Army! Ivar Smilga was a Latvian! He headed the Revolutionary Military Council of the Western Front. By the way, apart from the fact that they were all international Bolsheviks, they had something else in common! They were all defeated by the Poles in the 1919-21 war. In any case, I could go on and on with the list of international Bolshevik officials and officers showing that this was not a fight against Russia, but against international Communism. Which is why this war of 1919-21 should properly be called the Polish Bolshevik War and not the Polish Russian War.
I continue the comment below!
Another mistake in the video is that the wrong term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was used. Which unfortunately is a standard error. The use of this term is incorrect for two reasons! The first reason why the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is incorrect is the fact that the incorrect use of the term Commonwealth gives the impression that the Polish state has some kind of legal basis for the equality and equal status of Poles and Lithuanians as the incorrect term Commonwealth would suggest. But this state was not a kind of legal basis for the equality and equal status of Poles and Lithuanians as the wrong term Commonwealth suggests. So the Rzeczpospolita was not a kind of legal basis for the equality and equal status of Poles and Lithuanians. Because that was a Polish Empire and not a Polish Lithuanian Empire. Poles dominated all peoples of the empire. Because the Poles completely dominated this state and were imperial ruling ethnic group. The Poles dominated the entire state! So also Lithuania. There was no equality whatsoever as the wrong term "common wealth" suggests. Polish wealth was always crucial. So if anything then Polishwealth and not Commonwealth. The state took over the Polish constitution Nihil Novi in1505 and not a Lithuanian constitution. Thi imperial constitution of 1505 was the actual founding of the Rzeczpospolita. Determined by the Polish Parliament Sejm! That the Poles dominated the state is also clearly shown by the name of the state. The ruling Poles have also determined what the state should be called Polisch Rzeczpospolita! But even before the establishment of the Rzeczpospolita Poland was an empire and then during the time of the Rzeczpospolita, Poland continued to be an empire! That was actually just the founding of the Polish noble Republic democracy by the Polish nobility. Which, amazingly, was nevertheless a monarchy with a king elected by the nobility!So the founding of the Polish monarchical noble republic as an elective monarchy. It was revolutionary at that time, because 10%-15% of the population, which was the Polish nobility at that time, had the power for the internal affairs of the state. In the rest of Europe, the proportion of the population of the nobility was 1% of the population and not 10-15% as in Poland. In the rest of Europe, with the exception of England and some Italian republics, monarchs ruled despotically. So otherwise despots rule everywhere! The revolutionary constitution Nihil Novi in 1505 passed by the Polish parliament applied to the entire Polish Empire as well as to Lithuania. Through this revolutionary constitution Nihil Novi in 1505, Poland became the Rzeczpospolita Nobles' Democracy! The state was no longer called the Kingdom of Poland, but the most serene (most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland. The constitution was the primary element of the democratic governance in the Polish kingdom which granted Parliament extensive powers. The Parliament (Sejm) was a powerful political institution and the king could not pass most of laws without the approval of that body.
The second reason why the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is wrong is the fact that it is a mistranslation of the Polish term Rzeczpospolita as I mentioned. So this term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is wrong! This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern, nonsensical invention by 20th century historians that does not correspond to reality. This state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. NEVER! Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. The correct translation for Rzeczpospolita is Republic and certainly not Commonwealth. In other languages it is also correctly translated as a republic, but in English it is always translated incorrectly as Commonwealth. The wrong translation is used again and again. But even today, Poland calls itself Rzeczpospolita Polska, which is actually the official Polish name of the state! Lithuania doesn't call itself that way. Because in reality, Poland was the Rzeczpospolita in earlier times and is that still today! Not Polish Lithuanian Rzeczpospolita but the Polska Rzeczpospolita! Would anyone call Poland today Commonwealth because Poland today is Rzeczpospolita? Of course not, because it is wrong today as it was wrong in the past to call this Polish state Commonwealth! Today Rzeczpospolita Polska is also correctly translated in English as the Republic of Poland and not wrong Commonwealth Poland! Why is that then wrongly translated with Commonwealth for the earlier times. Actually absurd! Incidentally, the first documented with the use of the term Rzeczpospolit as a designation of the Polish state can be found in Maćka Borkowica's act of allegiance, for the Polish king Kazimierz the Great on 16. February 1358 in the town of Sieradz. At that time Lithuania was not yet united with Poland at all! So the Polisch term Rzeczpospolit was the name for Poland even then. Because even then the Polish nobility took the first steps towards becoming a noble republic! By the way, the state from back then is generally referred to in Poland as the 1st Polish Republic so the 1st Polish Rzeczpospolita in Polish I Polska Rzeczpospolita. Then in Polish, II Polska Rzeczpospolita is called the Polish Republic between the wars. The III Polska Rzeczpospolita is then the republic for the Poles from 1989 after the liberation from the soviet occupation. The by the communist henchmen so-called Polish People's Republic (in Polish Polska Rzeczpospolita Ludowa) to which Poland was forced by the Soviets, is not recognized by the Poles as a Polish Rzeczpospolita and therefore there are 3 Rzeczpospolitas and not 4. However generally in Poland the first Polish republic is recognized as the I Polska Rzeczpospolita from the 16th century. This republic is not called in Poland Polish Lithuanian Rzeczpospolita but only Polish Rzeczpospolita (republic). Because that was above all a Polish state and a Polish empire! Before that it was also a Polish Kingdom and Empire!
The term Rzeczpospolita seems difficult to pronounce for non-Poles. But that is not the case at all. With a little practice, anyone can pronounce the term correctly, even you. A little help: Rz is pronounced like the "isi" in vision. So virzon sounds like vision. Cz sounds like the "ch" in church. So Czurcz sounds like church. But if one just use "sh" instead of "rz", that sounds close to Polish. "Ch" can be used instead of "cz". With these clues, everyone can probably read the term Rzeczpospolita. The Anglicized term Shechpospolita could also be used as an alternative. So Shechpospolita would be written in English, which could be pronounced without problems. So there is no reason not to use this correct term Rzeczpospolita or Shechpospolita.
By the way, the Polish Empire could also be used as an alternative to Rzeczpospolita for this state if one wants to use a modern term. Because that was a Polish Empire and not a Polish Lithuanian Empire. Because the Poles completely dominated this state and were the rulers.
So just a wrong translation and the false claim about equality and equal status of Poland and Lithuania that didn't exist! Because that was a Polish empire controlled by Poles.
@@GreatPolishWingedHussars nah, it was called rzeczpospolita obojga narodow, which translates literally to commonthing of both nations. thus polish-lithuanian commonwealth is a good translation.
@@wilhelmu Your claim does not correspond to historical reality! The term of the Rzeczpospolita of two nations was used very rarely. Because that was just an empty phrase that had nothing to do with reality. The term with the two nations was also not used as the name of the state. Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. In the document establishing the Rzeczpospolita it is stated that "by this agreement the Kingdom of Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania are an inseparable, undivided entity and a common republic that united both states and nations into one people" So that contradicts this term with both nations.
Incidentally, you don't use the wrong translation Commonwealth yourself and instead use "commonthing of both nations"! Why? Because Commonwealth is the wrong translation of Polish term Rzeczpospolita. Incidentally, Poland is still called Rzeczpospolita Polska in Poland today, which is translated into the English Republic of Poland and not wrong Commonwealth Poland. Republic not Commonwealth! By the way, Lithuania doesn't call itself Rzeczpospolita, just Poland calls itself Rzeczpospolita. Because that was always Poland and the name of the Polish Empire and State. So with the arguments I listed above and these additional arguments, you should then have understood that the term Commonwealth is wrong and that the term with both nations does not correspond to historical reality either.
@@GreatPolishWingedHussars Jakie zle tlumaczenie, "rzecz" i "pospolita", rozumiesz co ja do ciebie mowie czy nie
Could you do Spanish-Portuguese wars, franco-Spanish wars or Greco-persian wars?
Yes do the Persian Wars
Greco-persian oh yes
Bora lá
Não és o único bracarense por aqui. Hehe
@@silvasilva2696 Só há espaço para um...(wild west theme plays)
respect to Poland from persia
Iliya Dadgar We almost went to war with you, from California.
@@linkven9196 idgas tbh
Iliya Dadgar Nor should you because we’re just civilians and we’re not at war, and due to the fact neither of us are directly involved with either regimes
Respect Persia 💪 I Love Persia 😊
Persia helped Poland in WW2 WORLD WAR. THANK YOU PERSIA ❤️
Brytyjczycy pomogli A nie jakas Persja nieuku.
this is not 100% well done. for example, Polish troops reached Kiev in 1920.
Sure, 20,000 made it to the Katyan forrest as well - they did not show that either
@@PeterSodhi wow You're so funny hahaha
-_-
Poland took Kiev in 1018 as well.
@@PeterSodhi i guess they did pretty well. What bout 20 k russians in polish camps?
Very nice! I'd suggest you to do the video about Sviatoslav I of Rus campaigns in 964-971, he did really large and successful campaigns which I think can be compared to Alexander the Great's success.
Yes, Sviatoslav I's achievements were impressive! But the comparison with Alexander the Great is an exaggeration. Because Sviatoslav I did not have such a powerful and actually superior enemy as Alexander the Great had with the Persian Empire. By the way, actually a good video but there are some mistakes. When Poland conquered Moscow in the war of 1609-1618, the son of the Polish king became Tsar of Russia. Therefore, on the map at that time, the territory of Russia should have been marked as the territory ruled by Poland. A large part of the Russian nobility wanted to submit to the new tsar from Poland. Unfortunately, because of the king's incompetence mainly religious intolerance , Poland lost control of Russia. Despite losing control of Russia, the Polish Empire was able to conquer important areas such as the city of Smolensk.
Which is also a mistake to mention the Polish Bolshevik War in the list of Polish-Russian wars. Because the Polish-Bolshevik War was not a Polish-Russian war, since the enemy were international communists and not just Russian communists. Many important Bolshevik officials were not Russian. Lazar Kaganovich was a Jew! He was the head of the bolshevik government of Tashkent! Solomon Lozovsky was Jewish! He was the executive of Communist International. Semyon Dimanstein was Jewish! He played a central role in the work of the People's Commissariat of Nationalities. Adolph Joffe was a Crimean Tatar! He was People's Commissar (minister) of State Control of the Ukrainian. Lazar Kaganowitsch was Jewish! He was the First Secretary of the Communist Party of Ukraine. Grigory Sokolnikov was Jewish! He was posted to Central Asia as chairman of the government of Turkestan and commander of the Turkestan army! Yakov Sverdlov was Jewish! He worked to consolidate Bolshevik control of newly conquered territories and coordinated there the Red Terror campaigns. He also played a major role in authorising the execution of the Romanov royal family in July 1918. Lev Kamenev was Jewish! He was President of the Council of People's Commissars and Politburo chairman. Yakov Yurovsky was Jewish! He was Chief of the Gold Department of the State Treasury. The commanders of the Red Army were also international! Leon Trotsky was Jewish. He headed the Red Army as People's Commissar for Military and Naval Affairs. Sergey Kamenev was Ukrainian! He was commander in chief of the red army and the most important man in the red army after Trotsky. Joseph Stalin was Georgian! Commander of the Southwest Front! Mikhail Alafuso was Ukrainian! He was Chief of Staff of the 3 Army. August Kork was an Estonian! He was the commander of the 6th Army. Hayk Bzhishkyan was Armenian! He was commander of the III Cavalry Corps. Nikolai Sollogub was Belarusian! Commander of the 16th Army! Ivar Smilga was a Latvian! He headed the Revolutionary Military Council of the Western Front. By the way, apart from the fact that they were all international Bolsheviks, they had something else in common! They were all defeated by the Poles in the 1919-21 war. In any case, I could go on and on with the list of international Bolshevik officials and officers showing that this was not a fight against Russia, but against international Communism. Which is why this war of 1919-21 should properly be called the Polish Bolshevik War and not the Polish Russian War.
I continue the comment below!
Another mistake in the video is that the wrong term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was used. Which unfortunately is a standard error. The use of this term is incorrect for two reasons! The first reason why the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is incorrect is the fact that the incorrect use of the term Commonwealth gives the impression that the Polish state has some kind of legal basis for the equality and equal status of Poles and Lithuanians as the incorrect term Commonwealth would suggest. But this state was not a kind of legal basis for the equality and equal status of Poles and Lithuanians as the wrong term Commonwealth suggests. So the Rzeczpospolita was not a kind of legal basis for the equality and equal status of Poles and Lithuanians. Because that was a Polish Empire and not a Polish Lithuanian Empire. Poles dominated all peoples of the empire. Because the Poles completely dominated this state and were imperial ruling ethnic group. The Poles dominated the entire state! So also Lithuania. There was no equality whatsoever as the wrong term "common wealth" suggests. Polish wealth was always crucial. So if anything then Polishwealth and not Commonwealth. The state took over the Polish constitution Nihil Novi in1505 and not a Lithuanian constitution. Thi imperial constitution of 1505 was the actual founding of the Rzeczpospolita. Determined by the Polish Parliament Sejm! That the Poles dominated the state is also clearly shown by the name of the state. The ruling Poles have also determined what the state should be called Polisch Rzeczpospolita! But even before the establishment of the Rzeczpospolita Poland was an empire and then during the time of the Rzeczpospolita, Poland continued to be an empire! That was actually just the founding of the Polish noble Republic democracy by the Polish nobility. Which, amazingly, was nevertheless a monarchy with a king elected by the nobility!So the founding of the Polish monarchical noble republic as an elective monarchy. It was revolutionary at that time, because 10%-15% of the population, which was the Polish nobility at that time, had the power for the internal affairs of the state. In the rest of Europe, the proportion of the population of the nobility was 1% of the population and not 10-15% as in Poland. In the rest of Europe, with the exception of England and some Italian republics, monarchs ruled despotically. So otherwise despots rule everywhere! The revolutionary constitution Nihil Novi in 1505 passed by the Polish parliament applied to the entire Polish Empire as well as to Lithuania. Through this revolutionary constitution Nihil Novi in 1505, Poland became the Rzeczpospolita Nobles' Democracy! The state was no longer called the Kingdom of Poland, but the most serene (most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland. The constitution was the primary element of the democratic governance in the Polish kingdom which granted Parliament extensive powers. The Parliament (Sejm) was a powerful political institution and the king could not pass most of laws without the approval of that body.
The second reason why the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is wrong is the fact that it is a mistranslation of the Polish term Rzeczpospolita as I mentioned. So this term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is wrong! This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern, nonsensical invention by 20th century historians that does not correspond to reality. This state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. NEVER! Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. The correct translation for Rzeczpospolita is Republic and certainly not Commonwealth. In other languages it is also correctly translated as a republic, but in English it is always translated incorrectly as Commonwealth. The wrong translation is used again and again. But even today, Poland calls itself Rzeczpospolita Polska, which is actually the official Polish name of the state! Lithuania doesn't call itself that way. Because in reality, Poland was the Rzeczpospolita in earlier times and is that still today! Not Polish Lithuanian Rzeczpospolita but the Polska Rzeczpospolita! Would anyone call Poland today Commonwealth because Poland today is Rzeczpospolita? Of course not, because it is wrong today as it was wrong in the past to call this Polish state Commonwealth! Today Rzeczpospolita Polska is also correctly translated in English as the Republic of Poland and not wrong Commonwealth Poland! Why is that then wrongly translated with Commonwealth for the earlier times. Actually absurd! Incidentally, the first documented with the use of the term Rzeczpospolit as a designation of the Polish state can be found in Maćka Borkowica's act of allegiance, for the Polish king Kazimierz the Great on 16. February 1358 in the town of Sieradz. At that time Lithuania was not yet united with Poland at all! So the Polisch term Rzeczpospolit was the name for Poland even then. Because even then the Polish nobility took the first steps towards becoming a noble republic! By the way, the state from back then is generally referred to in Poland as the 1st Polish Republic so the 1st Polish Rzeczpospolita in Polish I Polska Rzeczpospolita. Then in Polish, II Polska Rzeczpospolita is called the Polish Republic between the wars. The III Polska Rzeczpospolita is then the republic for the Poles from 1989 after the liberation from the soviet occupation. The by the communist henchmen so-called Polish People's Republic (in Polish Polska Rzeczpospolita Ludowa) to which Poland was forced by the Soviets, is not recognized by the Poles as a Polish Rzeczpospolita and therefore there are 3 Rzeczpospolitas and not 4. However generally in Poland the first Polish republic is recognized as the I Polska Rzeczpospolita from the 16th century. This republic is not called in Poland Polish Lithuanian Rzeczpospolita but only Polish Rzeczpospolita (republic). Because that was above all a Polish state and a Polish empire! Before that it was also a Polish Kingdom and Empire!
The term Rzeczpospolita seems difficult to pronounce for non-Poles. But that is not the case at all. With a little practice, anyone can pronounce the term correctly, even you. A little help: Rz is pronounced like the "isi" in vision. So virzon sounds like vision. Cz sounds like the "ch" in church. So Czurcz sounds like church. But if one just use "sh" instead of "rz", that sounds close to Polish. "Ch" can be used instead of "cz". With these clues, everyone can probably read the term Rzeczpospolita. The Anglicized term Shechpospolita could also be used as an alternative. So Shechpospolita would be written in English, which could be pronounced without problems. So there is no reason not to use this correct term Rzeczpospolita or Shechpospolita.
By the way, the Polish Empire could also be used as an alternative to Rzeczpospolita for this state if one wants to use a modern term. Because that was a Polish Empire and not a Polish Lithuanian Empire. Because the Poles completely dominated this state and were the rulers.
So just a wrong translation and the false claim about equality and equal status of Poland and Lithuania that didn't exist! Because that was a Polish empire controlled by Poles.
🤣🤣🤣 in your dreams kid
@@salafimujahid He exaggerated, but your reaction is also an exaggeration!
@@GreatPolishWingedHussars how
You forgot about the Kiev campaign in 1920 when Poles captured Kiev. It's an important part of the Polish-Soviet war.
Was the movement of the front line of the Kiev campaign in 1920 really not shown? In any case, the Polish Ukranian War was not shown from November 1918 to July 1919! This war was in fact the forerunner of the Polish Bolshevik War. By the way, that is actually a good video but there are some mistakes. When Poland conquered Moscow in the war of 1609-1618, the son of the Polish king became Tsar of Russia. Therefore, on the map at that time, the territory of Russia should have been marked as the territory ruled by Poland. A large part of the Russian nobility wanted to submit to the new tsar from Poland. Unfortunately, because of the king's incompetence mainly religious intolerance , Poland lost control of Russia. Despite losing control of Russia, the Polish Empire was able to conquer important areas such as the city of Smolensk.
Which is also a mistake to mention the Polish Bolshevik War in the list of Polish-Russian wars. Because the Polish-Bolshevik War was not a Polish-Russian war, since the enemy were international communists and not just Russian communists. Many important Bolshevik officials were not Russian. Lazar Kaganovich was a Jew! He was the head of the bolshevik government of Tashkent! Solomon Lozovsky was Jewish! He was the executive of Communist International. Semyon Dimanstein was Jewish! He played a central role in the work of the People's Commissariat of Nationalities. Adolph Joffe was a Crimean Tatar! He was People's Commissar (minister) of State Control of the Ukrainian. Lazar Kaganowitsch was Jewish! He was the First Secretary of the Communist Party of Ukraine. Grigory Sokolnikov was Jewish! He was posted to Central Asia as chairman of the government of Turkestan and commander of the Turkestan army! Yakov Sverdlov was Jewish! He worked to consolidate Bolshevik control of newly conquered territories and coordinated there the Red Terror campaigns. He also played a major role in authorising the execution of the Romanov royal family in July 1918. Lev Kamenev was Jewish! He was President of the Council of People's Commissars and Politburo chairman. Yakov Yurovsky was Jewish! He was Chief of the Gold Department of the State Treasury. The commanders of the Red Army were also international! Leon Trotsky was Jewish. He headed the Red Army as People's Commissar for Military and Naval Affairs. Sergey Kamenev was Ukrainian! He was commander in chief of the red army and the most important man in the red army after Trotsky. Joseph Stalin was Georgian! Commander of the Southwest Front! Mikhail Alafuso was Ukrainian! He was Chief of Staff of the 3 Army. August Kork was an Estonian! He was the commander of the 6th Army. Hayk Bzhishkyan was Armenian! He was commander of the III Cavalry Corps. Nikolai Sollogub was Belarusian! Commander of the 16th Army! Ivar Smilga was a Latvian! He headed the Revolutionary Military Council of the Western Front. By the way, apart from the fact that they were all international Bolsheviks, they had something else in common! They were all defeated by the Poles in the 1919-21 war. In any case, I could go on and on with the list of international Bolshevik officials and officers showing that this was not a fight against Russia, but against international Communism. Which is why this war of 1919-21 should properly be called the Polish Bolshevik War and not the Polish Russian War.
I continue the comment below!
Another mistake in the video is that the wrong term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was used. Which unfortunately is a standard error. The use of this term is incorrect for two reasons! The first reason why the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is incorrect is the fact that the incorrect use of the term Commonwealth gives the impression that the Polish state has some kind of legal basis for the equality and equal status of Poles and Lithuanians as the incorrect term Commonwealth would suggest. But this state was not a kind of legal basis for the equality and equal status of Poles and Lithuanians as the wrong term Commonwealth suggests. So the Rzeczpospolita was not a kind of legal basis for the equality and equal status of Poles and Lithuanians. Because that was a Polish Empire and not a Polish Lithuanian Empire. Poles dominated all peoples of the empire. Because the Poles completely dominated this state and were imperial ruling ethnic group. The Poles dominated the entire state! So also Lithuania. There was no equality whatsoever as the wrong term "common wealth" suggests. Polish wealth was always crucial. So if anything then Polishwealth and not Commonwealth. The state took over the Polish constitution Nihil Novi in1505 and not a Lithuanian constitution. Thi imperial constitution of 1505 was the actual founding of the Rzeczpospolita. Determined by the Polish Parliament Sejm! That the Poles dominated the state is also clearly shown by the name of the state. The ruling Poles have also determined what the state should be called Polisch Rzeczpospolita! But even before the establishment of the Rzeczpospolita Poland was an empire and then during the time of the Rzeczpospolita, Poland continued to be an empire! That was actually just the founding of the Polish noble Republic democracy by the Polish nobility. Which, amazingly, was nevertheless a monarchy with a king elected by the nobility!So the founding of the Polish monarchical noble republic as an elective monarchy. It was revolutionary at that time, because 10%-15% of the population, which was the Polish nobility at that time, had the power for the internal affairs of the state. In the rest of Europe, the proportion of the population of the nobility was 1% of the population and not 10-15% as in Poland. In the rest of Europe, with the exception of England and some Italian republics, monarchs ruled despotically. So otherwise despots rule everywhere! The revolutionary constitution Nihil Novi in 1505 passed by the Polish parliament applied to the entire Polish Empire as well as to Lithuania. Through this revolutionary constitution Nihil Novi in 1505, Poland became the Rzeczpospolita Nobles' Democracy! The state was no longer called the Kingdom of Poland, but the most serene (most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland. The constitution was the primary element of the democratic governance in the Polish kingdom which granted Parliament extensive powers. The Parliament (Sejm) was a powerful political institution and the king could not pass most of laws without the approval of that body.
The second reason why the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is wrong is the fact that it is a mistranslation of the Polish term Rzeczpospolita as I mentioned. So this term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is wrong! This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern, nonsensical invention by 20th century historians that does not correspond to reality. This state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. NEVER! Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. The correct translation for Rzeczpospolita is Republic and certainly not Commonwealth. In other languages it is also correctly translated as a republic, but in English it is always translated incorrectly as Commonwealth. The wrong translation is used again and again. But even today, Poland calls itself Rzeczpospolita Polska, which is actually the official Polish name of the state! Lithuania doesn't call itself that way. Because in reality, Poland was the Rzeczpospolita in earlier times and is that still today! Not Polish Lithuanian Rzeczpospolita but the Polska Rzeczpospolita! Would anyone call Poland today Commonwealth because Poland today is Rzeczpospolita? Of course not, because it is wrong today as it was wrong in the past to call this Polish state Commonwealth! Today Rzeczpospolita Polska is also correctly translated in English as the Republic of Poland and not wrong Commonwealth Poland! Why is that then wrongly translated with Commonwealth for the earlier times. Actually absurd! Incidentally, the first documented with the use of the term Rzeczpospolit as a designation of the Polish state can be found in Maćka Borkowica's act of allegiance, for the Polish king Kazimierz the Great on 16. February 1358 in the town of Sieradz. At that time Lithuania was not yet united with Poland at all! So the Polisch term Rzeczpospolit was the name for Poland even then. Because even then the Polish nobility took the first steps towards becoming a noble republic! By the way, the state from back then is generally referred to in Poland as the 1st Polish Republic so the 1st Polish Rzeczpospolita in Polish I Polska Rzeczpospolita. Then in Polish, II Polska Rzeczpospolita is called the Polish Republic between the wars. The III Polska Rzeczpospolita is then the republic for the Poles from 1989 after the liberation from the soviet occupation. The by the communist henchmen so-called Polish People's Republic (in Polish Polska Rzeczpospolita Ludowa) to which Poland was forced by the Soviets, is not recognized by the Poles as a Polish Rzeczpospolita and therefore there are 3 Rzeczpospolitas and not 4. However generally in Poland the first Polish republic is recognized as the I Polska Rzeczpospolita from the 16th century. This republic is not called in Poland Polish Lithuanian Rzeczpospolita but only Polish Rzeczpospolita (republic). Because that was above all a Polish state and a Polish empire! Before that it was also a Polish Kingdom and Empire!
The term Rzeczpospolita seems difficult to pronounce for non-Poles. But that is not the case at all. With a little practice, anyone can pronounce the term correctly, even you. A little help: Rz is pronounced like the "isi" in vision. So virzon sounds like vision. Cz sounds like the "ch" in church. So Czurcz sounds like church. But if one just use "sh" instead of "rz", that sounds close to Polish. "Ch" can be used instead of "cz". With these clues, everyone can probably read the term Rzeczpospolita. The Anglicized term Shechpospolita could also be used as an alternative. So Shechpospolita would be written in English, which could be pronounced without problems. So there is no reason not to use this correct term Rzeczpospolita or Shechpospolita.
By the way, the Polish Empire could also be used as an alternative to Rzeczpospolita for this state if one wants to use a modern term. Because that was a Polish Empire and not a Polish Lithuanian Empire. Because the Poles completely dominated this state and were the rulers.
So just a wrong translation and the false claim about equality and equal status of Poland and Lithuania that didn't exist! Because that was a Polish empire controlled by Poles.
Фига сколько комплексующих поляков в комментариях, видимо злые такие потому что в Англии случились массовые увольнения, просто поняли, что африканцы чистят толчки так же, а просят в разы меньше.
@SursumCordaVivatRzplita польская курва, иди в европу туалеты чистить
@SursumCordaVivatRzplita За такие слова будешь гореть, зачем угрожать?
bruh
ruskie już nie mają miejsca do prostytucji bo nikt nie chce używanego przez 30 innych osób
@@hohloebuTeL at least we have toilets in Europe, russian peasants are still trying to steal toilet paper technology...the only whores on this planet are russian after Mongols made you slaves!!!!!!!!!
If you include The Duchy of Moscow, you also have:
Muscovite-Lithuanian Wars
Livonian War
Northern Seven Years' War
Include invasions you have:
The Russian invasion of Livonia
is there a video about Polish-Russian cooperation? that would be nice to watch
Keep going with the great work!
Can you do next videos:
The Islamic conquest of the Persian and the Roman lands, Crusades wars against Muslims, Turko-Persian Wars, German-French wars, History of the Arabian Peninsula and the Levant, History of the Italian Peninsula.. Please (if you can)
ربـيـع Kings and generals has some intresting documentaries on early muslim conquests.
@@supremelordoftheauspicious2928 Yeah, I watched all of his videos about it
why Tsar Alexis I(Aleksey I) looks like asian if his fully Russian??? wtf the propaganda?
ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%90%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%B9_%D0%9C%D0%B8%D1%85%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87
عفوا لدي سؤال هل انت عربي او مسلم?
Sorry I have question are you arbic or Muslim ?
@@manafhadi8743
أنا عربي و مسلم.
Next German/Austrian-Hungarian wars, Or Turkish-Hungarian wars?
Poland: *exists*
Catherine: this is offensive
I remember when I was a kid and was so surprised when I learned how big Poland was in the past.
Poland is a lot bigger now than it was through most of its time. And I dont really know if we should include Poland-Lithuania in this, since it was not just poland?
@@TheBarser by the latter stage of the union Poland ennexed most of the Lithuanuans lands past Belarus and became dominant. Also it's still smaller or at most similar now compared to how it was throughout its time.
Lithuania was much bigger until they combined
Lithuania was much bigger however handed half its land to poland in union
The drum beat made me think that an OH WAH AH AH AH was coming any moment.
Video starts with huge mistake. Until beginning of 18th century Russia didn’t have access to Baltic Sea.
дружище ,ты ошибаешься,россия с новгородом захватила ингерманландию,и лишь в 1617 потеряла ее в войне со шведами
The Ottoman state did not accept the sharing of the Kingdom of Lehistan for many years. When the sultan accepted the foreign ambassadors, he always asked the Polish ambassador, where the grand vizier approached quietly, as if the sultan whispered in his ear, but with the intention to announce to everyone who was there, he said: "The Polish ambassador is on the way, but it is delayed by the traffic on the roads". In some works, in the annual invitations accepted by the Ottoman Grand Viziers to the Russian embassies, the Russian, Austrian and Prussian ambassadors said, "Where is your Polish colleague? I can not see among you!" It is stated that the question is directed.
Turkey know what horrible can be Russia if eats to many countries. Russians in head wants invade Istambul becose they ortodox religigion comes from Konstantinopol. Turkey however have good relationships with Ukraine special some citizens of Ukraine got Tatar Turic roots. We both knows if Ukraine and other falls Russia some day can watch evil eye on Turkey.
It's pretty amazing at how in 1656 Poland was backed into a corner, yet managed to come back from it.
The map of 1919 is total fantasy. Most of 1919 (between spring and late autumn) Ukraine was under control of general Denikin forces, not under Soviets. Moreover, in October 1919 his troops were between Orel and Tula and threatened Moscow.
Не совсем так.На 1919-20 год в Крыму,да и в Одессе были русские войска,чего здесь не показано,конечно же...
it's considered Poland vs Russia in the video, Poland wasn't real ally with Denikin because of his Imperialism and disability to talk with " just a part of Russian empire" so they merged it
@@motorola4075 война же была,можно было вообще двумя цветами разделить)
@@motorola4075 белые же там наобещали же украинцам и т д,что выпустят их самостоятельно)
там была война,гражданская,почему вы ни учитываете сговор?
Poland has a terrible defensive position of the country - Hello Great Poles, and Lithuanians from Russia
О, да. Зато русские oxyeнна чувствовали себя рядом с Сибирским ханством, Крымским ханством, Астраханским ханством, Золотой ордой, Швецией, а потом с 1,3 млн Индией и 1,5 млн Китаем. В 1700-х годах русская территория была размером с теперешнюю Федерацию, а население всего составляло около 7-9 млн человек. Как ты думаешь, таким населением легко было удерживать такую огромную территорию?
they didn't have too because they would crush anything with the cavalry. Polish forces despised any forms of fortifications and kept focus on open battles. They were helpless when fire got more important and Sejm wasn't working properly.
@@user-Victoria44I77 It wasn't bad because India and China were behind in tech, exiles and small forces were enough to keep these snowy and useless (in these times, who would know that they will give that much profit now) lands
It is the worst position ever - between two superpowers who want to shar common border :/ it is a miracle Poland is still on the map
Martin Z lets hope Russia won’t try and destroy Poland in the future since in the next decade or two Russia might annex Belarus so it will have a big border with Poland again
what are you gonna do next? the history of akkad, israel, hittites, assyria, sea people, argos, babylon, persia, or athens?
Во первых, когда Русские и Поляки воевали, мы Украинцы копали черное море!
Иди лечись😅😅😅
Что еще скажешь? Белорусы картошку сажали?
найс отсылка
И пирамиды строили
@@hazanchikpetechkin4250
И Америку открывали
the Lithuanian involvement in the wars is greatly undermined so it should be called Polish-Lithuanian-Russian wars
It would be an interesting alternative to see - Lithuania not being a junior partner in commonwealth. But even without Poland lithuanians were a minority in their own country. May be it could work if duchy was united in one religion.
@@sodinc they were never a junior partner. This was a Union
@@moinsen3906 do you want to say that lithuanian language was used as often as polish, lithuanian economy wasn`t significantly smaller than polish, there was as many lithuanians as poles, and Lithuania had not given their rulership over Ukraine to polish crown?
Or that they had equal rights de jure? I can agree only with the last part.
@@sodinc Lithuania was stronger and bigger then Poland, but Poland made Lithuania weaker in PLC
@@moinsen3906 exactly what i mean
Stephen Báthory: Hungarian (Transilvanian) prince, Polish king
Respect from Hungary
12:18 the timing was perfect for that corridor to come up
10:35 fun fact: Adam Jerzy Czartoryski was born in the same day and month as me. 14 january.
Polish-Bolsheviks war wasn't between Russia and Poland. Russian Empire was fighting against Bolsheviks. It wasn't Russia or USSR which was created years later. It was Bolsheviks revolution
Bolsheviks were Russians too.
it was also russia. Civil wars are "pretty normal"
@@michamarkiewicz1642 No
Bolsheviks was united Ukrainian Belarusian Baltics and Russian people which had communist ideas but wasn't official country
They didn't had goverment or professional generals
It was just marching people into Europe to spread communist ideas and it wasn't Russia
Russian goverment wanted monarchy and to fight Bolsheviks that's why Bolsheviks killed the tsar
@@Kenzi2731 both in tsarist and bolshevik movements there were members of other nation. Russia was a great empire, it was natural that people form other nations than russian adopted russian culture and became the members of russian elite. Even now: for example Sergei Shoigu is Tuvinian. Lavrov has armenian roots from one side etc etc
@@michamarkiewicz1642 I used Belarussian SSFR Ukrainian and more just for example
And Bolsheviks wasn't a country
To be named a country u need to be recognized by other world nations and USSR wasn't recognized until civil war ended fully and war with Poland
USSR was formally created in 1922 or 1924 and war between Poland was in 1920
So Bolsheviks was just random people making a revolution but it wasn't ruled by Russian goverment so it wasn't Russia
Russia and USSR isn't the same country
Russia and Russian Empire is the same country
We need a contract . Poles don't capture to Moscow again, and we don't share Poland anymore .
We went to Moscow once and no one else did. That't enough for a trophy XD
@@user-dn5gn1it8y Я ведь о смутном времени не читал и видео не смотрел , а ты мне открыл глаза , спасибо .
@@user-hc4xz6js7hРофл. ?
I am confused. In 1611 and forward I see a gray area expanding. In the previous war I understood this to mean the Swedes. But I thought this war was declared on the premise that Russia had allied Sweden? So who is the gray area? Wikipedia indicates Sweden fought alongside Russia.
Love Poland from Russia.
Niet brackim wojnam
Too bad your imperialistic elites and our USA puppet regime think otherwise. Regards from Poland.
Love Russia from Poland too.
yikes
Future we will friends !!!!!!!!!
Poland Respect Russia and Russia Poland !
@@nicsmiesznego4726 No chyba jednak usa i nasze marionetki są bardziej agresywne.
In the Soviet invasion of Poland you forgot that the base on helium (this long thing far to the north of Poland) capitulated after capitulation of Warsaw, not before.
The name Hel is not translated though
Helium to pierwiastek xddd
No wars between Brothers! Love to Poland from Russia
@Jan Kowalski 68 jprld
@Jan Kowalski 68 co ty masz do Żydów xd
@Jan Kowalski 68 Xd
Jak wymordowali miliony Słowian?
@Jan Kowalski 68 Xd
@Jan Kowalski 68 te mordy to dyktatura rosyjska
I think you forgot about Lisowczycy advance in Southern Russia.
He captures Kursk and defeated Russian forces at Bolkhov, in 1617. And even more Polish army with a Cossack hetman, Petro Sahaidachny attacked South and resulted in sacks numerous forts such as Putivl, Kursk, Yelets.
Yes, there were some mistakes in the video! For example when Poland conquered Moscow in the war of 1609-1618, the son of the Polish king became Tsar of Russia. Therefore, on the map at that time, the territory of Russia should have been marked as the territory ruled by Poland. A large part of the Russian nobility wanted to submit to the new tsar from Poland. Unfortunately, because of the king's incompetence mainly religious intolerance , Poland lost control of Russia. Despite losing control of Russia, the Polish Empire was able to conquer important areas such as the city of Smolensk.
Which is also a mistake to mention the Polish Bolshevik War in the list of Polish-Russian wars. Because the Polish-Bolshevik War was not a Polish-Russian war, since the enemy were international communists and not just Russian communists. Many important Bolshevik officials were not Russian. Lazar Kaganovich was a Jew! He was the head of the bolshevik government of Tashkent! Solomon Lozovsky was Jewish! He was the executive of Communist International. Semyon Dimanstein was Jewish! He played a central role in the work of the People's Commissariat of Nationalities. Adolph Joffe was a Crimean Tatar! He was People's Commissar (minister) of State Control of the Ukrainian. Lazar Kaganowitsch was Jewish! He was the First Secretary of the Communist Party of Ukraine. Grigory Sokolnikov was Jewish! He was posted to Central Asia as chairman of the government of Turkestan and commander of the Turkestan army! Yakov Sverdlov was Jewish! He worked to consolidate Bolshevik control of newly conquered territories and coordinated there the Red Terror campaigns. He also played a major role in authorising the execution of the Romanov royal family in July 1918. Lev Kamenev was Jewish! He was President of the Council of People's Commissars and Politburo chairman. Yakov Yurovsky was Jewish! He was Chief of the Gold Department of the State Treasury. The commanders of the Red Army were also international! Leon Trotsky was Jewish. He headed the Red Army as People's Commissar for Military and Naval Affairs. Sergey Kamenev was Ukrainian! He was commander in chief of the red army and the most important man in the red army after Trotsky. Joseph Stalin was Georgian! Commander of the Southwest Front! Mikhail Alafuso was Ukrainian! He was Chief of Staff of the 3 Army. August Kork was an Estonian! He was the commander of the 6th Army. Hayk Bzhishkyan was Armenian! He was commander of the III Cavalry Corps. Nikolai Sollogub was Belarusian! Commander of the 16th Army! Ivar Smilga was a Latvian! He headed the Revolutionary Military Council of the Western Front. By the way, apart from the fact that they were all international Bolsheviks, they had something else in common! They were all defeated by the Poles in the 1919-21 war. In any case, I could go on and on with the list of international Bolshevik officials and officers showing that this was not a fight against Russia, but against international Communism. Which is why this war of 1919-21 should properly be called the Polish Bolshevik War and not the Polish Russian War.
I continue the comment below!
Another mistake in the video is that the wrong term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was used. Which unfortunately is a standard error. The use of this term is incorrect for two reasons! The first reason why the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is incorrect is the fact that the incorrect use of the term Commonwealth gives the impression that the Polish state has some kind of legal basis for the equality and equal status of Poles and Lithuanians as the incorrect term Commonwealth would suggest. But this state was not a kind of legal basis for the equality and equal status of Poles and Lithuanians as the wrong term Commonwealth suggests. So the Rzeczpospolita was not a kind of legal basis for the equality and equal status of Poles and Lithuanians. Because that was a Polish Empire and not a Polish Lithuanian Empire. Poles dominated all peoples of the empire. Because the Poles completely dominated this state and were imperial ruling ethnic group. The Poles dominated the entire state! So also Lithuania. There was no equality whatsoever as the wrong term "common wealth" suggests. Polish wealth was always crucial. So if anything then Polishwealth and not Commonwealth. The state took over the Polish constitution Nihil Novi in1505 and not a Lithuanian constitution. Thi imperial constitution of 1505 was the actual founding of the Rzeczpospolita. Determined by the Polish Parliament Sejm! That the Poles dominated the state is also clearly shown by the name of the state. The ruling Poles have also determined what the state should be called Polisch Rzeczpospolita! But even before the establishment of the Rzeczpospolita Poland was an empire and then during the time of the Rzeczpospolita, Poland continued to be an empire! That was actually just the founding of the Polish noble Republic democracy by the Polish nobility. Which, amazingly, was nevertheless a monarchy with a king elected by the nobility!So the founding of the Polish monarchical noble republic as an elective monarchy. It was revolutionary at that time, because 10%-15% of the population, which was the Polish nobility at that time, had the power for the internal affairs of the state. In the rest of Europe, the proportion of the population of the nobility was 1% of the population and not 10-15% as in Poland. In the rest of Europe, with the exception of England and some Italian republics, monarchs ruled despotically. So otherwise despots rule everywhere! The revolutionary constitution Nihil Novi in 1505 passed by the Polish parliament applied to the entire Polish Empire as well as to Lithuania. Through this revolutionary constitution Nihil Novi in 1505, Poland became the Rzeczpospolita Nobles' Democracy! The state was no longer called the Kingdom of Poland, but the most serene (most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland. The constitution was the primary element of the democratic governance in the Polish kingdom which granted Parliament extensive powers. The Parliament (Sejm) was a powerful political institution and the king could not pass most of laws without the approval of that body.
The second reason why the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is wrong is the fact that it is a mistranslation of the Polish term Rzeczpospolita as I mentioned. So this term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is wrong! This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern, nonsensical invention by 20th century historians that does not correspond to reality. This state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. NEVER! Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. The correct translation for Rzeczpospolita is Republic and certainly not Commonwealth. In other languages it is also correctly translated as a republic, but in English it is always translated incorrectly as Commonwealth. The wrong translation is used again and again. But even today, Poland calls itself Rzeczpospolita Polska, which is actually the official Polish name of the state! Lithuania doesn't call itself that way. Because in reality, Poland was the Rzeczpospolita in earlier times and is that still today! Not Polish Lithuanian Rzeczpospolita but the Polska Rzeczpospolita! Would anyone call Poland today Commonwealth because Poland today is Rzeczpospolita? Of course not, because it is wrong today as it was wrong in the past to call this Polish state Commonwealth! Today Rzeczpospolita Polska is also correctly translated in English as the Republic of Poland and not wrong Commonwealth Poland! Why is that then wrongly translated with Commonwealth for the earlier times. Actually absurd! Incidentally, the first documented with the use of the term Rzeczpospolit as a designation of the Polish state can be found in Maćka Borkowica's act of allegiance, for the Polish king Kazimierz the Great on 16. February 1358 in the town of Sieradz. At that time Lithuania was not yet united with Poland at all! So the Polisch term Rzeczpospolit was the name for Poland even then. Because even then the Polish nobility took the first steps towards becoming a noble republic! By the way, the state from back then is generally referred to in Poland as the 1st Polish Republic so the 1st Polish Rzeczpospolita in Polish I Polska Rzeczpospolita. Then in Polish, II Polska Rzeczpospolita is called the Polish Republic between the wars. The III Polska Rzeczpospolita is then the republic for the Poles from 1989 after the liberation from the soviet occupation. The by the communist henchmen so-called Polish People's Republic (in Polish Polska Rzeczpospolita Ludowa) to which Poland was forced by the Soviets, is not recognized by the Poles as a Polish Rzeczpospolita and therefore there are 3 Rzeczpospolitas and not 4. However generally in Poland the first Polish republic is recognized as the I Polska Rzeczpospolita from the 16th century. This republic is not called in Poland Polish Lithuanian Rzeczpospolita but only Polish Rzeczpospolita (republic). Because that was above all a Polish state and a Polish empire! Before that it was also a Polish Kingdom and Empire!
The term Rzeczpospolita seems difficult to pronounce for non-Poles. But that is not the case at all. With a little practice, anyone can pronounce the term correctly, even you. A little help: Rz is pronounced like the "isi" in vision. So virzon sounds like vision. Cz sounds like the "ch" in church. So Czurcz sounds like church. But if one just use "sh" instead of "rz", that sounds close to Polish. "Ch" can be used instead of "cz". With these clues, everyone can probably read the term Rzeczpospolita. The Anglicized term Shechpospolita could also be used as an alternative. So Shechpospolita would be written in English, which could be pronounced without problems. So there is no reason not to use this correct term Rzeczpospolita or Shechpospolita.
By the way, the Polish Empire could also be used as an alternative to Rzeczpospolita for this state if one wants to use a modern term. Because that was a Polish Empire and not a Polish Lithuanian Empire. Because the Poles completely dominated this state and were the rulers.
So just a wrong translation and the false claim about equality and equal status of Poland and Lithuania that didn't exist! Because that was a Polish empire controlled by Poles.
Antworten
@@GreatPolishWingedHussars Are you okay?
@@Leantenant Is this an attempt to provoke? The attempt failed!
@@GreatPolishWingedHussars Nope
But it's not okay write a whole book in UA-cam comments.
Poland: I have so many wars with Russia!
Turkey: **laughs in ottoman**
@Venomus
Turkey and Poland already in NATO
We fight more with Poles than sosmans)))
@Venomus мне пох!
No more Brother Wars!
so there is just four of us who think the same way - that's sad
Stolen comment
You started
wdym by brothers? if you personally think that poles are your brothers than ok, but don't be saying for the whole Russia
Bro we are no brothers, we have only similar language.
We are respecting international rules-you are not,
we are respecting our borders - you are not (Ukraine War, Belarusian case)
we have demokracy- you dont
we dont have oligarchs- you do
we want peace and grow with our EU friends - you dont
I've had informations that in 1612 Polish-Lithuanian forces occupied territory north to Vologda but were halted during siege of Yaroslavl.
They were up to Kostroma, when Ivan Susanin, the local guy they toke to show the way, lead them right into a deadly swamp. They killed him of course but very few made it back.
With what programms do you do that animations,bro?)
11:18 is there any historical evidence of that flag being used? I'm not talking about the coat of arms of January Uprising, but the white-red-blue flag.
12:38 Lenin Looks like a boss
NathAndFriends he looks like fisherman lol
female wouldnt be Tsar but Tsaricha
So, russian talk "Tsaritsa"
@@deliberately9753 yeah
Imperatritsa
Tsar', Tsaritsa, Imperator, Imperatritsa
@@deliberately9753 Yeaa
Fun fact: Ivan the terrible was actually a relative to Vytautus and Jogaila, so technically he and Stefan had a claim to each other's thrones
May I ask where are the wars of 4th and 6th coalitions as well as the great patriotic war of 1812?
Love both from Mexico
2:42 Sad moment
best*
@@lordpolish2727 Но мы вас победили всё равно :)
@@user-dw1yy8fp5k Is the USSR still a thing? Poland is
@Alex Surname no pole is seriously advocating to retake The Kresy, the Soviets deported most poles from the area
@Alex Surname Poland already took in like 2 million Ukrainians for work
I have looked up in your channel description. Never've before I cringed that badly.
Probably ironic
Probably a joke lol just look at their pfp
As a polish person, i wished poland lithuania would never would fall, but oh well. Empires have to fall sometimes.
Polish-Lithuanian, Russian wars; can't leave my boy Lithuania without representation :3
OK, Can we can talk about that Poland and Russia NEVER were friends in entire history?
Yes
We were freinds 1945-1989
And the rest of history we were enemies
@@PatrikVolkov1994 Fake friends, puppets don't count
@@jarogniewtheconqueror2804 yeah Poland is a nato puppet
@@jarogniewtheconqueror2804 kinda make sense anyway because we don't need those coward polish as our freind
Poland vs Russia is like the Slavic version of England vs Ireland!
Yeah poland is england russian is ireland
@@Slownerer russia is greenlaand
@@jackfrost901 poland is congo 💩
@@agorbogytr13 and thats why people from other countries coming here to work )
@@jackfrost901 🤣, Poles are fleeing to get to the UK.
If poland will stop su**king american d(*)k, we all know, poland is going to become congo of europe.
🇷🇺☦💪💪
Вы рассказали не о всех конфликтах между Россией и Польшей, вы не упомянули поход Владимира Святославича на червенские земли 981 год, о киевском походе Болеслава 1 1018 год, о походе Ярослава Мудрого на Польшу 1030 1031 года, о киевском походе Болеслава 2 1068 - 1069 года, о битве при завихосте 1205 год, о войне за объединение галицко волынского княжества 1205 - 1245, о Краковском походе Льва Даниловича 1280 год
Next : German - Franco Wars. Everyone are waiting this 🔥🔥🔥
So with the exception of the first world war you just want a compilation of france getting it's ass kicked?
@@delta2372 30 Year War , Napoleonic Wars , WW 1 ?
@@bokuto3350 prussians and germans are two different things
@@delta2372 As example , Friedrich the Great or Von Blücher aren't Germanic ?
@@bokuto3350 germanic and german are 2 different things moron
**Moscow getts pillaged 4 times since foundation**
I sleep.
**Russia invades Poland 2 times**
Wait, that's illegal!
Moscow got pillaged around ten times if you count the 5+ crimean invasions
Russia invaded Poland 7 times...
Good vid
10:45 OH GOD KILL IT KILL IT WITH FIRE also 13:05 Lenin is so relaxed
10:19 Chopin has left the chat
Love to both from India.🐯
What do you use to make these videos?
My youtube fucked up and a thumbnail on that video was a polish comentary channel exposing actually happened (russian channel) and it was fitting pretty well
pls do ancient greece-grate alexander-byzantium and greece history
History should always remain truthful, good , bad , does not matter, what maters is truth. Let all Slavs from every Slavic lands, we are, and always be family, and families do fight. we must never forget history, but we must forgive eachother. It has always been my dream to once and for all, unite our Slavic tribes under one umbrella of freedom and respect for eachother, through this, we can become the most powerful force on earth and live the best, wealthiest , and most powerful family on the planet, the powers that be fear this the most, im willing to fight and die for my slavic families, are you my Slavic brothers and sisters willing to join me
@POLAK LACH so you think it is better to remain divided so that we can fall to western ideology.....
@POLAK LACH LOL, what does that mean...
13:40 One tiny correction: Mościcki resigned and was raplaced by Raczkiewicz on September 30th 1939
8:50 holly shit, that's fast