A new look at active vs passive (Michael Green)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 33

  • @chetanshenoy3093
    @chetanshenoy3093 4 роки тому +14

    Under appreciated thesis but highly relevant, as we will see in the future years.

  • @Zlaylowz
    @Zlaylowz 4 роки тому +6

    Thank you Mr. Green. Goddamn brilliant.

  • @Baklau007
    @Baklau007 4 роки тому +13

    "We will encounter some sort of cyclical event during which corporate profitability deteriorates.... *COUGH, COUGH* excuse me"
    Uncanny foreshadowing. 35:20

  • @sejongchun8350
    @sejongchun8350 3 роки тому +1

    Brilliant presentation. Mr. Green has further elaborated his thesis in various interviews.

  • @Foekcisoqnfis13
    @Foekcisoqnfis13 4 роки тому +6

    [14:12]Feb 2018, comovement, # of stocks moving in the same direction hit 100 %.
    It happened again in December.

  • @AgentOffice
    @AgentOffice 4 роки тому +9

    No one's going to be able to do price discovery when you're fighting passive

    • @anonymousAJ
      @anonymousAJ 2 роки тому +1

      Don't fight it. It's value time.

  • @senli9845
    @senli9845 2 роки тому +1

    wonderful insights, but I think, eventually when the active managers can not provide enough liquidity to support the market, central bank is going to swoop in and save the day. So far, the Fed can only hold MBS and Treasuries. Eventually, Fed is going to be able to hold corporate debts.

  • @alexanderalejandre241
    @alexanderalejandre241 4 роки тому +5

    Brilliant.

  • @jacobsteenhuysen7526
    @jacobsteenhuysen7526 4 роки тому +10

    WELL, he was right

  • @ControlTheGuh
    @ControlTheGuh 3 роки тому +2

    Curious to see him update this thesis with the current retail run in the stock market

  • @kaos092
    @kaos092 2 роки тому

    Can anyone explain what he means when he says instead of owning 40% bonds and 60% equities you now own 100% bonds and 100% equities? I understand the part about bonds creating a synthetic put on equities, but the rest is lost on me. Is he saying that people are leveraging their bonds to buy equities?

  • @joseph.bkazmi
    @joseph.bkazmi 3 роки тому +2

    The way Mike so eloquently explained why interest rates don't matter when discounting equities left me with a long pause...

  • @AgentOffice
    @AgentOffice 4 роки тому +3

    Dead on

  • @kennethcaldwell79
    @kennethcaldwell79 3 роки тому

    I don't have evidence but it appears that more and more people are buying individual stocks these days usually platforms like Robin Hood. How does this play into this index fund scare?

    • @moneyobsessed
      @moneyobsessed 3 роки тому +2

      thats pocket money, who has hundreds of grands invest in etfs or mutual funds

  • @fallenangel2123
    @fallenangel2123 4 роки тому +3

    High level GIBBERISH

    • @mkaberli
      @mkaberli 4 роки тому +11

      Really? Please give me one example and explain why you consider it to be gibberish. The onus is on you. Just because you can’t understand the concepts, doesn’t mean they’re gibberish.

    • @fallenangel2123
      @fallenangel2123 4 роки тому

      @@mkaberli
      This is not a "market" - it's actively managed, actively watched etc. Most of what he says is irrelevant

    • @ControlTheGuh
      @ControlTheGuh 3 роки тому +4

      @@fallenangel2123 lol you must be in another market than I am. May want to read up how passive is doing buy and sell decisions

    • @fallenangel2123
      @fallenangel2123 3 роки тому

      @@ControlTheGuh
      I was talking about the "stock market" - NOT the "bond market", "currency..." or "commodity..." (I don't really care about which one is "yours")

    • @fallenangel2123
      @fallenangel2123 3 роки тому

      @@ControlTheGuh
      ... "... buy and sell decisions ..."
      this one is easi - SELL the rallies and BUY the dips